Paul Thomas here reviews the persistent efforts to persuade the public that American public education is a failure, starting with the Reagan-era report “A Nation at Risk.” Never mind that none of its dire predictions about our economy came true (except for the outsourcing of jobs–not to countries with higher test scores but to countries with lower wages).
The Common Core is the latest iteration of the Nation-at-Risk narrative that our country needs higher standards and harder tests or we are doomed.
He writes that “Common Core is the problem, not the solution, because it is the source of a powerful drain on public resources in education that are not now invested in conditions related to racial and class inequity in our public schools.”
Where I disagree with Thomas is that he thinks it is a distraction to fight against Common Core and a waste of time. No, it is not a waste of time. Common Core and the tests connected to it will artificially cause test scores to collapse. It will label children as “failures” who are not failures at all. Most students, whatever their color, will be stigmatized by tests aligned with an absurd standard of proficiency (aligned with NAEP proficiency, which is equivalent to an A, in my view). Common Core, as Thomas notes, will bring about the transfer of billions of dollars to testing corporations and additional billions to technology companies and consultants. These billions will be drained from the budgets of public schools, meaning less money for essential and necessary educational opportunities.
The fight over Common Core brings to a head the confrontation between the accountability policies unleashed by Nation at Risk and policies that are based on the needs of children and concepts of education untainted by standardized testing.

Just to clarify: It is a distraction and flawed to fight against CC *as if CC is UNIQUELY the problem* and not acknowledging that CC is a continuation of the failed accountability paradigm. Thanks
LikeLike
Paul,
The quotes from Baldwin are succinct. I tried to cut and paste them but was unable. Can you do so, por favor!!!
Thanks,
Duane
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Texas Education.
LikeLike
“Accountability” should always be in quotes, at least when we’re talking about the rephormers’ version of “accountability”. Let’s stop pretending that they actually care about anything other than squashing teachers’ unions and privatizing (and profiting from) education.
LikeLike
It’s not a waste of time to fight against common core if you have children or grandchildren in the system.
LikeLike
True; this is not a philosophical debate for those taking their children to school each day. It’s very real like what will we eat today.
LikeLike
I hope Thomas’ comment cleared up any concerns you had. I think he meant to just stress that we needed to be aware that this “reform” push has a long history and that CC is just the latest iteration of a push to privatization. Knowing the history reminds us that the battle will not be won by the defeat of CC but will required continued vigilance.
LikeLike
2old2teach – what you say is true, we do need to be vigilant, but the fight against CC transcends any battle we’ve ever fought. This isn’t a local skirmish, it’s a revolution.
LikeLike
If you were referring to the corporate funded and supported fake public education reform movement, I want to suggest that a “coup” might be more accurate than a “rebellion”.
I think the term “rebellion” might make the corporate supported fake education reformers seem more reputable than they are. After all, the U.S. was born from a rebellion.
What the these fake reformers are doing is more lie what Saddam Hussein or Hitler did to gain power in their countries. In both cases, they murdered the opposition and then changed the law to make their act of murder legal.
Coup: a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government
Rebellion: an act of violent or open resistance to an established government or ruler
I argue that Bill Gates and the other billionaire oligarch have illegally seized power from the government, and that the supporters of public education are resisting these oligarchs who came by their power illegally.
LikeLike
Question:
Going back to the mid-90s in NC it is obvious through the speeches of our governors (Martin, a Republican, and then Hunt, a Democrat) that “increasing accountability” was the magic buzz phrase to maintain the support of skeptical conservatives (or anyone suspect that teachers weren’t working hard enough). So now that accountability has sort of been run into the ground, I wonder if we can get away from that language and actually work towards another focus, or will this “30 years of failed accountability” just make conservatives (true conservatives) want to give up on public school?
LikeLike
A ready to copy and paste Tweet that leads back to this post:
Paul Thomas explains why Thirty Years of Failed Public School Accountability Deserves an F
#EdBlogNet
LikeLike
“Accountability”= blame
LikeLike
It seems that “A Nation At Risk”‘s purple prose always winds up being cited, but it’s absolutely clear that that document was generated to incite panic, not to reflect reality. Diane, is it really productive to keep using it as a “hook” when the subsequent reanalysis in the follow-up Sandia Report reveals ANAR as the tripe it is?
LikeLike