Laurel M. Sturt, education activist, explains here why she is voting for the Green Party this November. In New York, where she lives, the two major parties have become indistinguishable.
She writes:
“In the last decade, the Democratic party has become increasingly indistinct from the Republican, both parties in virtually impervious thrall to the siren of money. As exacerbated by the Citizens United and McCutcheon Supreme Court decisions, the–for all intents and purposes–wholesale prostitution of both parties to special interests has forced the true agenda of today’s elected officials into the light: the sacred civic duty supposedly embodied in a position called, after all, “public service,” has been exposed to be less motivational than the perks and influence inherent in a position of power. While we watch, haplessly marginalized on the sidelines of integrity, these unworthies blithely ply their incompetence–via obstructionism (McConnell), corruption (Rangel), or any number of ignominious affronts to decency, or democracy. This laser-focused drive to maintain a privileged position, moreover, comes with the most flagrant, arrogant dismissal of accountability. We came very close, after all, to electing a president with the hubris to trumpet the slogan “Country First” while simultaneously exposing us to the possibility of governance by Sarah Palin–and Rod Serling wasn’t even in the room when that decision was made! Indeed, her very choice as a running mate was a perfectly indicting metaphor for a system whose morality has gone AWOL, in a scenario increasingly where an elected official is not a bonafide public servant but simply playing one on tv. As such, our national script has abandoned the dignified legacy of John Adams, alas, in favor of The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas.
“The convergence of the two political parties in a shared embrace to protect the power status quo–enabled by money overriding principle–has been nowhere more evident than in the attack on public education. No Child Left Behind, despite its feel-good soundbite of education as a civil right, has been revealed to be a privatizing agenda from conservatives not compassionate but impassioned, in fact, by the prospect of public dollars pouring into private coffers. Indeed, the tools for this, among them a pervasive culture of high-stakes testing, have had the added bonus of busting teacher unions, the last inhibition to fully exploiting the education cash cow, a trillion dollar business opportunity here and abroad. Yet far from coming to the rescue of public education, Obama and likeminded Democrats such as New York’s Governor Cuomo have taken up their own torch and pitchfork with alarming alacrity: Race to the Top, and its proponents, have seized on the malevolent premise–and promise–of NCLB, simply ramping it up with steroids. Between the Common Core and other elements designed to privatize a public good, our education system is on the verge of devastation; incredibly, both parties have proven to be equal opportunity plunderers not just of any resource but that most precious of all, our children, the very future of our nation. We could use a Patriot Act, alright, one expressly for education.”
Let’s face it. Andrew Cuomo doesn’t like public schools. He sneers at teachers. If he is re-elected, expect the attacks on public education and teachers to escalate.
Don’t vote for the lesser of two evils. In this race, there is no lesser.
Vote Green.

I’d vote for the Green Party if I thought it would get the most votes. I am not so sure third parties stand a chance!
LikeLike
Even Teddy Roosevelt, who had name recognition, couldn’t pull it off in 1912.
LikeLike
Ms. Sturt, the Republicans LOVE hearing this sort of argument. This approach works fine in a primary race, but it’s downright dangerous in a general election or midterm. (Just ask President Nader.)
Please remember, the governor appoints a new U.S. Senator, should a sitting one die or resign. This can shift the balance of the U.S. Senate, creating repercussions down the line for our children that are far worse than the school reforms we despise.
Most Democrats are at least open to science and statistics, unlike Republicans. If you want the reform madness to end, keep Democrats in office and use facts to make your case. You’re much more likely to win in the end.
LikeLike
I don’t see how anyone who cares about public education can vote for Cuomo.
LikeLike
Cuomo does not like public schools and their teachers. He loves charter schools. He went into another rant about the public school monopoly today
http://www.longislandpress.com/2014/10/29/backlash-over-cuomo-monopoly-remarks-intensifies/
LikeLike
Diane, I can’t vote in NY, so I don’t have to make the choice, thank goodness.
But if I did, I’d hold my nose and vote for Cuomo in hopes he’ll see the light when confronted with overwhelming data that reforms are failing. (I’m hoping Obama will see the light soon as well.)
Astorino opposes Common Core not on principle but simply because Cuomo and Obama are for it, and he knows this position will play well with his Republican base. Beware of what he’d replace it with!
LikeLike
Cuomo won’t even campaign for the Democrats running for the State Senate, which would establish Democratic control of that body. He promised the Working Families Party to support members of his own party (!) but he broke his promise.
LikeLike
allinittogether,
There is a far greater chance that you may see the light than either Cuomo or Obama.
LikeLike
NJ Teacher, I’m well aware of how vital it is to push back on this destructive school reform and on other issues where many Dems have gone over to the dark side. If I could make Bernie Sanders president, I would. My two young children would have a better future because of it.
But I’m also a pragmatist who realizes we’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater if we vote third party and end up with more Republicans.
LikeLike
Agreed, allinittogether.
LikeLike
They do not stand a chance until people start voting their consciences. There was a study recently by social scientists at Rensselaer Polytechnic that showed that for the tipping point for social causes to occur, one needs to convince 10 to 12 percent of the populous to become vocal and active on behalf of the cause. The rest then go along.
People will not, in large numbers, abandon the corrupt parties until that 10 to 12 percent defects. People know of the corruption. Congress now has almost the lowest approval rating in its history. And yet they are afraid to vote their consciences because they do not understand the social dynamic I have just described–the network leader effect, one might call it.
Here’s another important point. Most elections are decided on margins of 3 percent or less. Politicians know this. If something starts happening because of defections to third parties, they will respond.
And what have we to lose? The Democrats and the Republicans have become, in many cases, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable.
LikeLike
I have voted third party several times. It has never accomplished what I hoped. The ones I liked least always won. I had been an Independent all my life.
LikeLike
You are, then, what is known as an “early adopter” of the change. Again, one has to reach the tipping point–10 to 12 percent–perhaps less in this case given how close elections generally are. Think of the suffrage movement. It was over 70 years after the Seneca Falls Convention that the 19th Amendment was passed by Congress. Things did not change until the magic number of vocal supporters was reached. The same has occurred recently in the U.S. with regard to gay marriage. The same happened with opposition to the Vietnam War. For a long time, there was stagnation. Then, when the magic number was reached, people jumped on the bandwagon.
LikeLike
Congress has the lowest approval rating in its history because of the GOP. The GOP has been incredibly obstructionist and has caused incredible delays in legislation and the functioning of government. We don’t have a surgeon general because of the GOP. The GOP has become the crazy party that is determined to throw a roadblock at every available opportunity. The GOP thinks that climate change is a hoax, is working overtime to limit the vote and wants to lower taxes on the rich. Voting Green in NY is OK because a GOP governor can only screw up NY state, not the whole country. Education is a big issue but there are many other issues at stake nationally. Thus, I voted for Obama the 2nd time because I wanted to block Romney from winning because he’s so regressive on other non-educational issues.
LikeLike
Here’s a report on the study:
http://news.rpi.edu/luwakkey/2902
LikeLike
There are many Democratic politicians trying to fix the problems brought by Citizens United, but they don’t have enough votes. Zero Republicans want to change it.
If good people vote third party, then Republicans win, and campaign financing will never get fixed.
People who claim the parties are just alike are grossly misinformed — and that’s just how the Republicans like them.
LikeLike
How is Rahm Emanuel different from a Republican? How is Cuomo? He won’t even keep his promise to Working Families Party to help Dems gain control of State Senate.
LikeLike
You got that right.
LikeLike
Diane, yes, Rahm Emanuel and Cuomo are horrible on a host of issues — and especially on the issue you care about most (school reform).
But they aren’t nearly as bad as Republicans on many other important issues, such as gun control, marriage equality, reproductive choice, climate change, etc.
Why vote third party and, in effect, elect a Republican who would be bad on school reform AND all the other issues?
If Dems lose teachers, it will only shift the party to the right. They’ll learn the wrong lesson. It’s better to create change from WITHIN a political party — by getting involved at the primary level (and earlier).
LikeLike
I wish you were right. I don’t see how re-electing a DINO who listens only to Wall Street pushes the party to its roots and its base. How did Wall Street become the Dem base?
LikeLike
How did Wall Street become the Dem base? Respectfully, I reject the premise of your question.
Yes, Cuomo is particularly bad on this issue, but there are Dems across the nation speaking out against the campaign-financing rules that force them to raise money constantly in order to stay politically viable. As I said elsewhere, they WANT to change the system, but they don’t have the votes, so they’re trapped in it.
The lesson should be to elect MORE of them, not fewer, so there are enough of them to finally change the campaign-finance laws.
LikeLike
His financial advisers have all been Wall Street insiders. He runs the largest citizen surveillance program that the world has ever seen: http://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/
Perhaps there is a difference between him and Bush. Perhaps one wears boxers and the other briefs.
LikeLike
allinittogether, do I really have to outline the extremely right-wing positions of the Obama administration? The long and egregious list is obvious enough. Even on the issues where he eventually came down on the non-troglodyte side, he had to be pushed to do so. What was his position on DOMA? Well, his Justice Dept argued case after case FOR DOMA, and in speeches, he took the position that states should decide–the same position taken by pro-slavery advocates before the Civil War. Noam Chomsky has described Obama has the worst president for Civil Rights in our history. He has trampled upon fundamental liberties, including habeas corpus and posse comitatus–shocking from a man who taught Constitutional Law. His health care plan was the Romney plan before it was Obamacare. He has continued to prosecute, vigorously, the disastrous military adventurism of the Bush administration–policies that have, according to the Cost of War Project, cost the country between 4 and 6 trillion dollars–to what end? He has deported more aliens than did any previous president, spreading terror through our Hispanic communities. He has waged a war on legal medical marijuana dispensaries. He has made assassination, again, into national policy and championed a policy that makes him the sole arbiter of life and death for the individuals targeted. He has championed the creation of a national Common Core Curriculum Commissariat and Ministry of Truth and testing, testing, testing, testing, testing. He bailed out the banks and let homeowners lose their homes. His administration issues phony unemployment statistics that do not begin to show the true extent of the problem–the millions who are no longer eligible for unemployment because their benefits have run out.
The Republicans should have made him their candidate.
LikeLike
Bob, I’m well aware of President Obama’s faults. He’s a politician, and politicians often have to take hardline positions in order to get elected and unpleasant compromise positions to get anything done.
At least he is CAPABLE of coming to more enlightened positions, and he has done so on many occasions. Your list is a bit stale.
Do you really think President McCain or President Romney would have been better on ANY of the issues you mentioned?
*We’d still be in the depths of an economic depression.
*We’d be in the middle of World War III.
*Marriage equality would still be a pipe dream.
*Pot users and dealers in legal-weed states would be in jail.
*We’d have fewer, not more, people insured.
*Dreamers would continue getting deported.
*Unemployment benefits would be cut off earlier (and do you really think it’s fair to blame Obama for things congress is in charge of and he opposed).
*And education reform, I promise you, would have been far worse.
And those are only the issues you mentioned. Here are some others where President Obama and most Dems are FAR better than any Republican:
*Social Security privatization
*Medicare vouchers
*Reproductive rights
*Climate change (remember “Drill, Baby, Drill!”?)
*Guns
*Tax rates for the wealthy
*Equal pay
*Voting rights
. . . and lots more.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Work early from within the party to change it for the better. Don’t sabotage it later by voting third party, or we’ll all suffer the fallout.
LikeLike
I agree with you, allinittogether.
LikeLike
Really Deb. You only vote for people who “stand a chance”? Did you know that some major Republican players who were ahead in the polls recently lost to people with little financial backing? It’s because people are voting their conscience.
LikeLike
Oh I know that! I have voted for third party candidates many times. But it was always a throw away.
I know there have been “surprises” but, truly, if I think my third party vote will help take votes from the less horrible choice, I won’t do it.
LikeLike
Schoolgal, the upsets happened in the primary.
It’s a different story when you get to the end, and your “vote of conscience” centered around one issue ends up electing someone who is horrible on ALL issues!
LikeLike
With all respect to the other commenters, I address myself to Bob Shepherd—“tipping point.”
Yes!
People often look back and see the end results of big movements for social change, not what it took to get there. For example, could people possibly have forgotten how long the civil rights movement and the anti-war in Vietnam movement were marginalized and ridiculed and defamed?
Yes, and they forget how often people [I think often with good intentions] were waiting for those activists to just “grow up” and “be mature” and “work through the system” for “real change.”
I would only add to your comments: change is hard, and the bigger the change and the challenge to entrenched interests, the harder it is.
Let’s keep in mind what a true American hero wrote:
“Those who profess freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the land.” [Frederick Douglass]
But isn’t that just rhetorical hot air? Nope. And all the plowing that pro-public education advocates have done, and are doing, is slowly [painfully slow, true] but surely bearing fruit. The tide is turning.
Perspective. The owner of this blog has featured this before:
“First they ignore, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” [Mahatma Gandhi]
A “better education for all” has come from far back on the judges’ scorecards to start pulling ahead of the self-styled “education reformers.” The fight isn’t over, but they’re beginning to bleat and whine.
That’s the canary in the mine.
Just my dos centavitos worth…
😎
LikeLike
Thanks KrazyTA for this very astute assessment. Believe me, as an active member of the Green Party for almost 15 years now, I can tell you that we are the poster children for the famous Mahatma Gandhi quote, “First they ignore, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” I mean, our Presidential candidate Jill Stein was actually arrested and held for many hours just for attempting to attend the debate she should have been participating in! So, I think we are somewhere between fighting and winning right about now 🙂 – Geez, what would have happened if the Civil Rights movement activists listened to the people who told them, “you should give up. You can’t win. White supremacy is just too intrenched.”?? My goodness, what kind of cynicism have we come to when people advise that we vote for the “evil of two lessers” (yes, they are both evil!) just because they think the hero can’t win? As I stated in another post, Greens ARE winning and this time with Howie Hawkins, we are taking a huge giant leap forward. But in the meantime, here is another quote for you from Eugene Debbs, “I would rather vote for what I want and NOT get it, than vote for what I DON’T want and get it”. — But we DO get something. We will get a huge piece of the conversation back, a growth in the movement, and ROW C!! That is nothing to sneeze at!
LikeLike
You don’t vote for them because you think they’ll win; you vote to protest the Democratic Party candidate Cuomo, and to eventually increase our voting choice by making other-party candidates increasingly likely and possible. (It has to start somewhere.)
The next step is for teachers to push for more choice on our ballots.
Don’t vote for terrible people. It’s that simple.
A
LikeLike
How true, how true. I hpe the AFT & NEA recognize this and refuse to ride the bus with the lesser of 2 evils in 2016. Look at who is sharing the stage with Jeb Bush? http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/24/jeb-bush-hillary-clinton-together-again-to-talk-education/
Clinton and Bush exemplify the corrupt status-quo. Both are signaling to their respective donors that nothing will change re: education policy if either one is elected as president. A fly on the wall might hear them in the backroom talking to a bankster: “So pony up. You boys can count on me to crush the teacher’s union.
Could it be any clearer that privatizing K-12 and higher education is the final solution for the Dems to capture Wall St?
LikeLike
My circle of close friends are teachers…a few teach in private Catholic School and one teaches in public school. NO ONE is discussing any of this. Not common core, accountabilty regimentation, charters, Cuomo, the democratic process, and, of course, the most disturbing issues associated with these catalysts, this acceleration of an Ayn Randian, social Darwinistic society disconnected and devoid of empathy. I do try, though, to enlighten, yet the resistance is palpable and my own isolation is despairing. You see, so much is normalized in our society, now…the blatant disdain for the public, especially directed at those individuals who struggle with making ends meet with minimal resources, is verbalized daily by politicians (public servants???), and the wealthy elite. We have accepted deceit and scandals and amoral behavior while the specter of encroaching power and domination by the 1 or 2% hovers over our shoulders. Overwheling, all of this, and very difficult to explain to people without fervor, frustration, and appearing, well, off my rocker.
We are a vulnerable populace now; so many are ragged and weary from the stubborn effects of the malingering economic meltdown and, in the east, Hurricane Sandy, and so, many of us are occupied with just surving. How convenient.
I think of a quote by Simone Weil, “Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity.” It is time to be attentive, it is time to reach that “tipping point.”
Vote Green
LikeLike
You perfectly described how I feel………there is little to no empathy for those who struggle. My colleagues also seem disconnected and accepting these new norms. I am hopeful that more people are finding the Green Party. Please consider this event in NY
http://www.theeconomicsofhappiness.org/economics-of-happiness-nyc
LikeLike
We have exactly the same situation occurring in Rhode Island. Both candidates for Governor are pro charter schools. When Obama and Chris Christy come to support both candidates, you know we are in for some difficult times.
LikeLike
To The Reading Professor –
You could replace Rhode Island with Connecticut as our gubernatorial candidates are exactly the same as yours.
As for “the two major parties have become indistinguishable”, I would add undesirable.
Truly, “The Lesser of Two Weevils”.
LikeLike
Add Illinois to that list.
LikeLike
Dienne, Illinois is a hot mess. If Quinn is elected, you will see a mass exodus from IL just like CA. People will be taxed to death. We are taxed enough already and for what?
LikeLike
And they forced the green candidate for governor out of the race in Illinois with a bogus challenge to his petitions. All we have left is a choice between two evils or perhaps three if you include the libertarians. The Republicans didn’t manage to eliminate them. Rahm has two serious challengers who both represent the chance for positive change.
LikeLike
“The More Effective Evil”
The “Evil more effective”
Is better than the lesser
If evil’s your objective
Then vote for wolf sheep-dresser
LikeLike
One of your best. And that’s saying a lot.
LikeLike
Dienne: what you said.
😃
And I recommend Laurel M. Sturt’s book, DAVONTE’S INFERNO: TEN YEARS IN THE NEW YORK PUBLIC SCHOOL GULAG (2013).
😎
LikeLike
LOVE IT and so right on, too. Big money talks BIG.
LikeLike
Nice one.
LikeLike
Diane, here in NJ some are writing in former congressperson Rush Holt (or another name of their choice) for Senator because neither the Republican nor Democratic candidates offer a positive alternative. This blog has posted about NJ Senator and candidate Cory Booker’s role in the growing privatization of schools in NJ.
For the first time in my voting life I will also be following this alternative path. I can’t bear not to vote, but want to vote for someone I believe in. Political parties do not own our votes. They have to start understanding that.
LikeLike
It’s safe to vote third party or write in Rush Holt, it’s safe to make a protest vote against Booker because he will most likely win. His GOP opponent is a wacky libertarianish regressive who wants to return the US to the gold standard which is nuts. Booker is a pro corporate Democrat who’s all for privatizing the schools but he’s more liberal on social issues and he certainly does not want to criminalize abortions. All that being said, if the GOP gains control of the Senate, things will be much worse because the GOP is the crack pot party that has gone far right wing with strong tinges of Ayn Randianism.
LikeLike
What do you mean “safe”?
That it’s OK to vote for a third party candidate only when the odious Democrat will win anyways, knowing that the Republican cannot win in any event – and that’s fine because how could you live with a Republican in that office?
I’m sorry, that kind of political calculation is in my opinion one of the causes of the current state of politics.
If you vote for the lesser of evils, you end up with evil.
if you vote for someone you dislike a bit less than the other person, you get who you voted for – someone you don’t like.
I used to think like you years ago, but gave it up. Now I vote my conscience, my values, my ethics. My candidates seldom win. That’s OK, because I can live with that. My votes add to the total that in time will have an impact on the Democratic Party. As stated above, once it reaches the tipping point the pendulum will start to swing back to traditional values and politics.
Now the Green Party and Hawkins don’t track perfectly with me, but that seldom happens with the Democrats either. Will Howie win? No, but I will have fulfilled my civic duty, voted for someone who would represent me better than any other candidate in the field, and that’s what it’s all about.
Perhaps if we had proportional representation of parties like in the European parliamentary tradition things would be different. I don’t know. But I will not give up the fight to change things by only voting for that change when it’s “safe” to do so.
LikeLike
By all means, don’t vote or vote for someone who doesn’t even stand a chance in hell of winning in a million years. By the way, the reason why so much money is flooding and corrupting our political system is in large part due to the move rightward in this country orchestrated mostly by the GOP which stacked the Supreme court with right wing ideologues. If Gore had won instead of Bush, maybe we would not be quite as bad off as we are presently. But you know, that right wing supreme court selected Bush and it made a huge difference……Bush, the eviler evil by a huge margin. At least Obama, who is indeed horrific on education, appointed two moderates to the supreme court as opposed to two rabid pro corporate right wingers whom Romney would have chosen.
LikeLike
Dear Joe,
I used to think like that–lesser of two evils, so I sincerely empathize with your point.
But not anymore. Now I think as long as we keep voting for these guys they will keep selling us out to monied interests and we will have only ourselves to thank.
I also think if the greater evil wins, so be it. At least then issues become clear to the public and can be defended against–the public can see what they are up against and people will be motivated to take a stand. In the case of Booker/NJ, for e.g., they won’t be lulled into a false sense that this guy, b/c he aligns with democrats, will uphold and fight to protect things like public education, while he is right at the center of taking it apart a la Newark and his reported connections to E3, whose President just informed a sponsored common core conference that the plan is to end public ed in Camden. (Really, you can watch the video.)
We won’t be asleep, as we all were, thinking a democrat like Obama would give relief from NCLB test and punish, only to see the installation of a guy like Duncan and the horrible policies that have flown forth since. I often think if Romney had made the same moves, he would have been called out early and hard. Perhaps democracy would have had a chance to work and things would not have escalated so furiously.
Anyway Joe, perhaps, we will just have to disagree on this point.
I will be voting to preserve public education for my children.
LikeLike
Joe, I take offense to your views on conservatives. Crack-pot? Really? You have to resort to name calling. What happened to ‘leaning forward’ and being tolerant? You prove with all your statements that the left are most intolerant. Obama is horrific on more than education. I guess you are more comfortable with Bill Ayers communist tinge.
LikeLike
You sir are absent of any type of logical cognitive abilities whatsoever. Returning to the gold standard is nuts? So you would rather have the fed print money continuously to the point where a meal at McDonald’s now cost over $15? Let me get this straight, you think that voting for one candidate over another is a great idea because the first thief is more liberal on meaningless issues such as gay marriage than the other crook. Guess what buddy at the end of the day you will still end up with a thief in office. But hey, at least he will let gay people whom make up less than 1% of the entire population get married. What kind of ass backwards thinking is that? Way to go there; that vote of yours is really going to accomplish something and that something is letting the Dems and Repub’s know just how stupid the American populace is. No wonder these immoral bastards do whatever the hell they want in such brazen fashion without any fear of repercussion at the polls. Hell, why not when there are bone heads out there whom think just like you just dying to line up and vote for a stiff. It is attitudes such as yours that have our Country in the deplorable state that it is in. Man I hope there aren’t too many more people out there adhering to your way of thinking because if there are we haven’t even seen the beginning of the worst. By the way, I would rather “throw away a vote” as you so ignorantly state on a Green Party member any day of the week than vote for ANY Democrat or Republican. Then again what do you know you voted for Obama twice and think that says a ton about your knowledge when it pertains to politics or lack thereof.
LikeLike
Funny how Democrats and the union in Florida pulled away from Nan Rich and went with Charlie Crist (Yuk!!) trying to sell him as a friend of education (Lie!!). People thought he would defeat Scott, but now the polls are running in favor of Scott. The WFP screwed Teachout and now we are stuck with an egomaniac who has the blessing of the AFT and UFT. In fact the AFT statement on Cuomo’s recent attack was lame to say the least.
LikeLike
Smart girl! Your screen name suits you. Charlie used to be Jeb’s best friend nuff said. He was pro vouchers now he is not. He was pro life now he is not. He was against gay marriage now he is for it. He was pro Charter schools and now he is pro public schools. He was a strong supporter of merit pay for teachers now he is against it. Empty suit Charlie is about one peanut and corn fragment away from being the full fledged turd that Rick Scott is. But hey you gotta give Scott some credit, at least he let’s you know that he is a POS and a crook up front unlike that Chameleon slickster Charlie Crist. Any teacher in Florida resting their hopes in Charlie Crist has simply been asleep at the wheel for quite some time.
LikeLike
It’s impossible to imagine voting for Andrew Cuomo. I don’t know who his Republican opponent is, and as I don’t live in NYC any more (left for Michigan in ’92 fully expecting to return to Brooklyn by ’94 but. . . stuff happened), I am not carefully checking. I supported Zephyr Teachout’s run at the Democratic nomination and would certainly write her name in without hesitation, barring the tiny possibility that the GOP candidate deserved my vote. But I am not a fan of the Green Party for a host of reasons, going back to at least the 2000 presidential election, when Ralph Nader helped give us 8 years of GWB, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, ad nauseam. Al Gore wasn’t the lesser of two evils, but rather the far better candidate. Doesn’t mean he would have been a dream president. But he’s not Andrew Cuomo, and I don’t think he was a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Eli Broad School of Public Education Policy (though given that he was from Tennessee. . . maybe so). Point is, the Greens are not my cup of coffee either, but if they ran someone I respected, that person might get my vote. I voted for John Anderson in 1980 (remember him?) and while I feel I was wrong about Jimmy Carter (and probably about Ted Kennedy, whose defeat in the primaries and at the Democratic Convention was likely a good thing), I don’t regret that particular 3rd party vote. It still comes down to the individual. I always blanch when I get an email that reads “We need more women” or “gays” or whatever category is being touted for public office without consideration of individuals. Who’s running for the Green Party? What education policies are being promoted? And what are the chances that, if elected, the candidate will really commit to them? Absent that on the table, just voting 3rd party seems like a pretty empty gesture.
LikeLike
Bravo Michael P. G.
I completely agree with you 110%.
It is worth to be carefully aware of:
“I always blanch when I get an email that reads “We need more women” or “gays” or whatever category is being touted for public office – without consideration of individuals.
Who’s running for the Green Party?
What education policies are being promoted?
And what are the chances that, if elected, the candidate will really commit to them?
Absent that on the table, just voting 3rd party seems like a pretty empty gesture.”
Whoever is running for a public servant position, must have honesty and integrity besides intelligence and a logical mind, NOT popular EMOTION like gay, or women, or black, or any minority reason. Back2basic
LikeLike
“But I am not a fan of the Green Party for a host of reasons, going back to at least the 2000 presidential election, when Ralph Nader helped give us 8 years of GWB, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, ad nauseam.”
Yep, that’s what the Dims and Rethugs want you to think.
That line has been completely debunked many many times. Hell, Gore didn’t even win his home state. If Gore wins that then he wins the presidency even with Georgie Porgie “winning” (sic) Florida when Gore pussed out on contesting that state’s election.
The line of thought blaming Nader and the Green Party is pure bullshit.
Just wait until the Jebster runs in 16. All the shenanigans will make 2000’s, and 2004’s electoral “discrepencies” seem like child’s play. I’d bet Michael Connell would agree with that.
LikeLike
Right on Sir. If you can’t win your own home state where the people who are voting are the ones who know you the best then I think that says a ton about you as a candidate. Furthermore, what in Al Gore’s career would lead any one to assert that he would have made for a great President? I’m sorry but i have a hard time believing that the imbecile who supposedly invented the Internet would have been the leader that this Country so desperately needed at that particular time in history.
LikeLike
Tell everyone who died in Iraq or lost someone there that Bush and Gore were interchangeable.
LikeLike
Come on Michael, you can do better than some cheesy strawman argument. I said nothing about them being interchangeable, only that the Nader and Greens gave the election to Georgie Porgie meme is bullshit.
LikeLike
Thought this might be of interest. The Commissioner in Texas is putting vouchers in his application for federal preK funds.
http://www.tasanet.org/site/default.aspx?PageType=3&DomainID=4&ModuleInstanceID=71&ViewID=047E6BE3-6D87-4130-8424-D8E4E9ED6C2A&RenderLoc=0&FlexDataID=1389&PageID=1
O.K.(Buddy) Wolfenbarger III
Superintendent
Comstock ISD
Ph. 432-292-4444
Fax 432-292-4436
Expecting Excellence Everyday!
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email (including any attachments to it) may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Please notify me (by return email or otherwise) immediately if you have received this email in error and delete it from your system.
LikeLike
To all conscientious educators:
It is quite puzzling in the election and voters’ emotion. I wonder where the true law of conscience from candidates is.
To me, I must be a dreamer and I am not the only one (in John Lennon’s Imagine song).
Honesty and integrity must be the utmost required conditions for any candidate to be public servant.
All voters should DEMAND each candidate’s written pledge in which their promises must be honored within a deadline and reasonable conditions to carry out their promises regardless of what party they belong to. Whenever the majority of public outcries, the elected official must declare his/her resignation, followed by the designated interim in their written pledge until the next available election is taken place.
Most importantly, if the public servant betrays to his/her voters’trust, (s)he will be banned from running any position in the public service FOR LIFE. It is very simple solution, only if the Green party spearheads this honorable execution as an example for future reference.
Am I a dreamer? Back2basic
LikeLike
I thank Ms. Sturt for telling it like it is (and DIane for posting it). Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones are running for Governor and Lt. Governor as the Green Party candidates in New York. The slate also includes Ramon Jimenez for Attorney General and Theresa Portelli for Comptroller. I hope everyone saw Howie in the televised Debate. He showed without a doubt why he is the most qualified to be Governor. The Green Party has been pointing out for many years how the influence of money has corrupted both parties to the point of no return. Finally more people are seeing the (Green) light! To those who think voting Green Party is a waste of time or that Greens can’t win, I want to let you know that despite the incredibly corrupt and unfair electoral system in the US (which Greens have been railing against and trying to change) the Green Party CAN and DOES win elections. We have almost 150 elected officials all over the country and several in NY state. And when Greens are elected, amazing things happen! New Paltz, NY Mayor Jason West and Deputy Mayor, Rebecca Rotzler made headlines interpreting New York State’s marriage law as too vague to specify gender and married legions of same sex couples. They then greened New Paltz’s sewer system by replacing a chemical treatment system with natural reed beds that do the job cheaper and greener! Gayle Mclauglin, Green Party Mayor of Richmond, CA has also been in the news for negotiating with banks to have the city buy off mortgages that are defaulting. She has also become creative using eminent domain to keep families in their homes. How do you like them apples!? But of course the media fails to mention that they are GP elected officials. Hummm? Greens are getting closer and closer to a much bigger win. Howie Hawkins ran for City Council in his home of Syracuse and lost by only 100 votes. Unfortunately the Working Families Party actually campaigned AGAINST Howie for a conservative candidate in that election and that may have caused him to loose (no comment). — Howie is currently breaking records by polling higher than any third party candidate has EVER polled in NY. This means that the Green Party is poised to become the third ranking party in the state and will then occupy ROW C on the state wide ballot. It is likely that the Green Party could even become the SECOND highest vote getters in many regions upstate where the GP is polling at 25%. This is BIG news folks! It will make headlines all over the country and will help the GP win more and more elections in NY as people will actually see us up at the top of the ballot and more likely vote for us in the future. – Howie is breaking records all over the place! Five Democratic clubs in NY have broken ranks with their party and endorsed Howie. More and more Democrats are seeing red….I mean Green 🙂 Be part of history and vote for Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones for Governor on Tuesday Nov. 4 (and please tell all your family and friends to do the same). You have nothing to loose, and only our Democracy and the earth to save.
Dani Liebling
Public School Parent and
Green Party Activist in Brooklyn, NY
LikeLike
Hi Dani:
Please convince Mr. Howie Hawkins to SPEARHEAD in a written pledge of who he is, what he will do within his term, and a guarantee of his resignation with the reliable interim (whom public trusts and endorses) whenever the majority of public outcries for his resignation and NEVER run for any position in public service.
He will execute his pledge as a permanent law so that American society will be guaranteed to have excellent public servants from any party without any corruption in the future.
If this happens, I am not the ONLY one who dreams about integrity from public servant.
Back2basic
LikeLike
Thank you, Dani, for an excellent post on why voting Green in NY is the right way to go now. Major media ignore the Greens, but not the pro-corporate Tea Party. The discontent left of center now is enormous. All us discontented progressives can make a difference by denying our votes to the Dems. It’s very, very hard to break the corporate stranglehold on elections, so it’s now surprise that the Greens advance slowly. Once the Dems finally lose the progressives who they constantly ignore, there will be an electoral thaw favoring faster growth of an independent party on the left. Help that happen by staying away from the Dems and their agents at the head of the teacher unions.
LikeLike
The tea party is not pro corporate. It stands for small central government, individual rights and liberties.
LikeLike
Doesn’t matter what the Tea Party thinks they stand for. They vote republican. Voting republican is voting for corporate control and authoritarianism.
…. when you have a weak central government you end up with corporate control with only company CEOs having individual rights and liberties. Civic responsibilities and the democratic process depend on a strong government that can stop the worst abuses of corporate power.
LikeLike
True. Very true. So many think they are voting for a set if values when they vote for the Tea Party. It is all a smoke screen. Ridiculous bunch of loud mouths who seem to be more about self but think they are about America…if it is their own vision of America. They do not understand the words “for all”.
LikeLike
A wonderful exposé of the Democrats (Obama, Cuomo, Booker) and Republicans (Walker, Christie) and the criminality that they espouse in their hidden agendas to sell out our children and our democracy)…Please post this to social media websites to alert caring Americans across our nation, of the dangers we face. Individuals such as these hold no moral compass, they are destroying our great nation because of their inhumanity and greed, they sell the souls of the people they falsely claim to represent…My family on Long Island will be voting Green….Hawkins for Governor.
LikeLike
For those of you arguing on the basis that you must vote Dem to keep out the Republicans, consider this: http://www.bsidneysmith.com/writings/Essay/Voting_Green_in_a_Swing_State
LikeLike
I’ve been a registered Green Party member for many years now, and have voted accordingly.
As Ms. Sturt has stated, I haven’t seen any difference between the Democrats and the Republicans at any level for years. People have told me that I’m “wasting my vote” by voting for Green Party candidates, but I don’t feel that this is so. How I really view “wasting my vote” is by voting for the “lesser of two evils” at the polls.
If enough people started to vote for third party candidates, instead of the entrenched political parties, at the very least, a message will be sent that the voters are NOT happy with the policies espoused by Democrats/Republicans.
This Tuesday, I plan to vote a straight Green ticket. Perhaps those of you that read this blog might consider voting third party, as well, instead of buying into the old self defeating rhetoric that you’re “wasting your vote”.
LikeLike
I like Tennyson’s advice
“Tis better to have voted third party and lost than never to have voted third party at all”
LikeLike
DON’T WASTE YOUR VOTE BY NOT CASTING IT, even if you have no faith in the system. Too much of America has been brow beaten and bullied into a stupor by campaign ads and even more so by the venal stupidity of politicians that it has all but forgotten that it can write in any candidate it chooses, including inanimate objects. I would love to see a protest movement where the “Silent Majority” who typically do not vote hear the message that they can and should write in anyone or anything they like and then do so as a protest. Imagine the panic among the political class and the lame stream media commentary when Bart Simpson or the mailbox on the corner gets enough votes to be impossible to ignore. What would absolutely burst their blood vessels would be if the “Silent Majority” decided on the ultimate protest vote and wrote in third party candidates. If you are totally disgusted by the system and think your vote matters not, being silent is the worst solution. At the very least, use the ballot box to express your righteous indignation at the fact that politicians of the two major parties don’t work for the people at all any more. Vote, but not for them.
LikeLike
I am with you. Green Party it is. No Cuomo. No Astorino. Period.
LikeLike
Exactly. New Yorkers who value education and integrity will wear green and vote Green for governor on Tuesday.
LikeLike
Eugene Debs said “It is better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don’t want and get it.” I completely agree with Ms. Sturt that both parties, at least on the national level, have sold out to the corporations and no longer serve the public’s interest. If I were in New York my vote would easily be for the Green Party because, as Debs said, you get no where and only dishonor your self, when you give your support to those who don’t deserve it. The movement will never get started if we keep on the same path of accommodation. The system is broken – voting to sustain what has become a farce is contrary to democratic values, IMO.
I loved Ms. Sturt’s reference to Rod Serling. Are we teachers not living in the Twilight Zone or what?
Lastly, where teachers have a real choice between the two major parties, as in Pennsylvania, where I live and teach, then I will vote accordingly. So it will be Tom Wolf, the Democrat, next week, and in 2016, Bernie Sanders or whoever the Green Party runs.
LikeLike
The historian Christopher Lasch wrote this over 20 years ago:
“‘We need to press the point more vigorously and to ask whether the left and right have not come to share so many of the same underlying convictions, including a belief in the inevitability and desirability of technical and economic development, that the conflict between them, shrill and acrimonious as it is, no longer speaks to the central issues of American politics.” –The True and Only Heaven, p. 23
I agree with Ms. Sturt. The democratic party doesn’t own my vote. They need to earn it, and if they don’t and a Republican gets into office as a result, it’s their fault.
LikeLike
“Convictions”
They rarely share conviction
The pols on left and right
For criminal interdiction
They’re seldom in the sight
LikeLike
I cannot say what I think of any teacher who would vote for Cuomo.
LikeLike
As far as I’m concerned, any teacher who votes for Cuomo will get what she deserves.
Unfortunately, so will all those who did not vote for him.
It is stunning to imagine that any teacher would vote for this so-called man.
LikeLike
Promote election CHOICE by voting third party, and then putting it on your radar.
WE NEED MORE CHOICE IN ELECTIONS. This is a huge push that teachers need to start making at a grassroots level. We need more candidates on the ballots.
Teachout should be on the ballot. In some other countries (I’m not sure about any states here-), she would have been, due to her good showing in the primary.
State-by-state policies matter. I didn’t even have the voice for Green in my state during the last presidential elections.
Push NY to more CHOICE at the polls by voting third party and promoting changes in laws pertaining to candidacies and very different campaign financing.
LikeLike
Hello justateacher.
FYI, WE DO HAVE A TEACHER ON THE BALLOT FOR GOVERNOR IN NY!!! He is Brian Jones and he is running as the Lt. Governor candidate with Howie Hawkins. They are the team like no other! – So, a vote for Howie Hawkins and Brian Jones on Tuesday in New York is a the biggest vote for teachers anyone could possibly make! Tell all you family and friends in NY to vote Hawkins/Jones! Vote Green Party!
LikeLike
Any teacher who votes for Cuomo might as well start wearing around a “KICK ME” sign and be done with it.
LikeLike
I don’t like much of what Astorino believes, but I can’t vote for Cuomo and a third party vote while philosophically it could sense a message, is in reality a waste of time. Cuomo will probably win because too many Democrats can’t begin to think about crossing party lines. We need to start thinking as educators first and forget theses party affiliations…I’m voting for Astorino.
LikeLike