Wendy Lecker, civil rights attorney, takes Connecticut’s Governor Dannel Malloy to task for his empty rhetoric about testing. He has consistently been a fervent support of standardized, high-stakes testing. Yet now he wants to roll back one test, in the 11th grade. Who is he fooling?
Throughout his administration, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s education policies have been characterized by a disdain for evidence of what helps children learn, and a refusal to listen to those closest to students — parents and teachers. While it has been proven that test-based accountability has done nothing to help learning, and has increased stress in children of all ages, Malloy callously maintained, “I’ll settle for teaching to the test if it means raising test scores.”
Now, weeks before the gubernatorial election, the governor has suddenly declared an interest in the welfare of children — or some children. In a self-congratulatory news release, the governor announced that he wrote to U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan to begin a “dialogue” about how to reduce one standardized test for 11th graders.
Malloy’s newly discovered concern for over-testing for one grade must be understood against his record on standardized testing. Just two years ago, the Malloy administration rushed through an application for an NCLB “waiver,” which exchanged some of NCLB’s mandates for many other mandates — including massively increasing standardized testing. The waiver obligated the state to administer the Common Core tests, including moving the high school test from 10th to 11th grade, and to use the widely discredited method of including standardized test scores in teacher evaluations.
Recognizing the potential for an explosion in standardized testing, parents, school board members and teachers implored the Malloy administration not to apply for the NCLB waiver until it assessed the impact on our children and the cost to taxpayers. Yet, the Malloy administration ignored these warnings and submitted the application….
Though Malloy professes concern about over-testing 11th graders, in reality he plans to increase testing for everyone. In May, his PEAC commission announced a plan to use multiple standardized tests in teacher evaluations going forward. Not only does this plan double down on the flawed practice of using standardized tests to measure a teacher’s performance, it also vastly increases testing for children. The SBAC interim tests, which the Malloy administration recommends, will likely double the standardized testing that already exists.
Against the reality of his policies, Malloy’s letter to Duncan proves to be nothing more than political posturing.

Off-topic, but this is a must-read: http://www.thenation.com/article/181762/venture-capitalists-are-poised-disrupt-everything-about-education-market
LikeLike
Wonder why they are not allowing comments?
LikeLike
What I want to know is, where is the script coming from? This same dialogue is coming from officials all over the country, including my own state’s Deborah Gist (amusingly just a few weeks after legislation passed that pushed use of standardized tests as a barrier to graduation back by three years).
Has the public noticed yet that there IS a script?
LikeLike
WereBat, there IS A script. You hear same rhetoric everywhere. Who is master?
LikeLike
Based on Wendy Lecker’s reporting, can she explain whether there are sufficient facts to file a colorable claim in federal court that the state has denied minority students substantive due process and equal [protection under the 14th Amendment?
LikeLike
Hi John:
If you would like to discuss your questions, maybe we can take this offline? You can email me at wendylecker@aol.com
LikeLike
Just checked Real Clear Politics to see what the polling was for Foley vs. Malloy, and Malloy is behind by 4 percentage points. He’s getting desperate and with desperation the lies will sprout like weeds in spring.
LikeLike
Unfortunately for those of us living in Connecticut, Tom Foley’s platform on education is market-driven and does not bode well for the state should he defeat Governor Malloy in this fall’s election. The following quotes were taken from an article written by Jenny Wilson in the 9/24/14/ issue of the Hartford Courant.
http://www.courant.com/politics/elections/hc-campaign-education-20140924-story.html
“At the core of Foley’s education plan is in-district school choice and “money follows the child” — two policies that, combined, will result in students leaving low-performing schools and then those schools being stripped of per-pupil funding. Foley has proposed implementing an A-through-F grading system for schools that would allow parents, whom he has described as “the best decision-makers” to choose where they want to send their children.”
“What I’m hoping is … the marketplace starts to exert pressure on schools,” Foley said. “Right away schools are on notice that if I’m governor, I’m going to make sure that this gets passed and implemented — so they should start being better schools right away.”
“Institutions that aren’t performing lose — that’s kind of the way the private sector works, and it ought to be the way the school works, too.”
Voters in Connecticut are faced with the prospect of having to choose between the “lesser of two weevils.”
LikeLike
That’s what I was thinking. But I disagree. This isn’t the lesser of two weevils. The choice is between what evil they want to live with as the state’s governor, because there is no real choice here. It looks like the public schools will lose either way.
I think this is the way the oligarchs work. They are controlling the candidate selection process so no matter who wins, they still get one of their puppets to do their bidding. The deck is stacked, and the corporate fake education reformers are dealing off the bottom and slipping cards out of their sleeves to win.
LikeLike
Yes, Foley is as bad as Malloy on education. But if Malloy wins, he will think he has a mandate for all the destructive education policies he has inflicted on our children, teachers, and schools. If he loses, it can be seen as a rejection of those policies. And all those so-called Democrats in the state legislature will have to rethink their behavior in blindly supporting Malloys deforms over the past 4 years.
LikeLike
If Foley “is as bad ad Malloy on education”, is it a case of the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know? If Foley wins, how do you know that he will not be more destructive than Malloy. Even if Malloy loses, you are assuming that he Democrats will “rethink their behavior…in supporting Malloy…”). If Foley is as bad as Malloy, might not the Democrats line up behind Foley, as Foley’s views on education are as vile as Malloy’s; as is said, where is the “cognitive dissonance”? The Democrats could easily fall in line behind Foley based on shared positions on education. Moreover, it will be politically smart not to alienate the new governor and pay the prices inherent in such opposition. The Ct voters are left with a Hobson’s choice and I don’t admire their position. Perhaps, the best choice is for voters who strongly disagree with both candidates on educational issues to stay away from the polls. In my mind Foley over Malloy could be worse than Malloy. In reality there is no choice at all. A damned shame and continued harm to kids,
LikeLike
He probably is getting a kick back from Pearson, and political donations form charter schools.
LikeLike
“Low Expectations”
Empty words
From empty suits
Chirps from birds
And quiet from mutes
On a more serious note, James Brown (a math teacher for 21 years), who is running against DeLauro in CT’s 3rd Congressional district wouldditch common core
DeLauro, some may recall, called for Pelto to drop out of the Democratic nomination race for governor while Pelto was still trying to get the signatures to be on the ballot. He failed, thanks to “democratic” folks like DeLauro.
DeLauro won’t debate Brown, of course. He’s obviously beneath her, being a teacher and all.
LikeLike
Jon Pelto has an interesting take on Foley’s education platform that supports Lloyd Lofthouse’s observation above especially the last sentence taken from the following excerpt!
“I think this is the way the oligarchs work. They are controlling the candidate selection process so no matter who wins, they still get one of their puppets to do their bidding. The deck is stacked, and the corporate fake education reformers are dealing off the bottom and slipping cards out of their sleeves to win.”
http://jonathanpelto.com/2014/09/26/tom-foleys-bizarre-move-education-policy-potential-impact-cea-endorsement/
From Jon Pelto’s blog:
“In what appears to be an ongoing effort to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory, Tom Foley, the Republican candidate for governor, has proposed an education policy that looks eerily similar to Governor Dannel “Dan” Malloy’s corporate education reform initiatives.”
“However, instead of providing Connecticut’s teachers, parents and public school advocates with appropriate policies that would support and strengthen public education,
Tom Foley has proposed an education plan that appears to be designed by the very same corporate education reform industry groupies that are behind Malloy’s ill-conceived education initiatives.”
LikeLike