A teacher from North Carolina wrote the comments below. I don’t agree with his conclusion that unions are responsible for teachers’ loss of control over their work. What he describes can be found in states that never had unions, that were always “right to work.” Who is the villain of the piece? Testing companies? NCLB? I would put the blame on the accountability movement, which now belongs to Congress and legislatures. They want to know “are we getting our money’s worth?” Can’t trust teachers to tell you, must trust standardized tests.
Mr. Worley of North Carolina writes:
There was a day when teaching was considered a profession. As a profession, those who taught were trusted with the education and the evaluation of the student. I grew up in schools that worked that way. Many of you did as well.
My first few years in teaching, it was still pretty much that way. While I dreaded the work of creating fair final exams and then grading them, there was satisfaction in knowing that my kids were doing the same kind of work they had done all year, and that I was the one doing the grading of it.
What has happened?
In my 18th year of teaching now, I no longer write any finals – the state writes them all. I no longer grade any finals – a bubble reading machine does that. I no longer have to consider whether and how to set a curve on their final exam – the state does that. I no longer am even allowed to administer the final to the students I have spent a whole semester with – a teacher outside of my content area must do that. I can’t even proctor the exam.
I spend months building a relationship with my students, slowly but surely getting to know each of them, and them getting to know me. We laugh together, we struggle together, we get mad at each other sometimes. Some days are hard, some not so much, but all of them are interesting.
My favorite comment from my kids remains, “Mr. Worley, you don’t understand. I so look forward to coming to your class each day.” It doesn’t matter whether they like math or not, whether they are particularly good at math or not. In our class, we are united in the notion that our day can be better as a result of having been in math class that day. For whatever reason.
What has happened?
It’s easy to point the finger at politicians and power-wielders who have precious little understanding of just what K-12 education looks like on a daily basis. And certainly these people continue to harm public education for what appear to be selfish reasons.
But we in the education camp have to take some responsibility as well. For far too many years we allowed union representatives to dig in their heels on issues related to rethinking education. We tolerated teachers who should have been quickly removed, protecting with union rights instead of taking a stand for a high level of professionalism. And with every story in the news, trust deteriorated.
Don’t misunderstand me. I have belonged to the teachers union. I was a building representative and believe strongly in the value of collective bargaining rights.
What I’m saying is, we allowed the union to take our voice. And, as a result, we lost our place at the discussion table. Now that sentiment is generally anti-union across the country, teachers are no longer welcome to have a voice, because they don’t feel they need to welcome us. Here in North Carolina we see a state General Assembly passing one piece of vicious attack legislation after the other against educators.
At some point we, the teachers, the ones who love this profession and who are passionate about the kids we serve, need to rise up and reclaim our rightful place as professionals. I’m not sure how. I’m not sure who can or will lead such a rising. But I am certain it needs to happen soon, before public education is dismantled and turned in to a private sector business.
Because education will be dead then…

“I no longer have to consider whether and how to set a curve on their final exam….”
Why would you ever have considered that? Why must kids be ranked against each other? If all kids score well, why can’t they all be considered excellent? Is “excellence” some scarce commodity that must be parceled out only to a small handful, to be determined by one or two points difference?
LikeLike
Dienne, not all kids DO score well. Where I taught, your “failure rate” better be below a certain percentage or you go on a growth plan. Never mind the quality of students in you class; never mind the socioeconomic status of the students; never mind your that the students don’t study and those that do bust that curve. I have never had a homogenous classroom in my life; so I never presumed to NOT consider a curve for my students.
LikeLike
So other than the administration telling you you have to, what exactly are the benefits of ranking students against each other?
LikeLike
It also doesn’t help when your teacher’s union is taking money from Bill Gates. How much are they really representing the educators?
LikeLike
In the mid-seventies when I taught special education, I use to think that the powers that be did not want all children to receive a quality education. Several of my students were misdiagnosed and did not really belong in my classroom and I could not convince the psychologists of this. To me it seemed that those at the top believed that if all children got a fair shot at learning that there would be too much competition for the jobs that were out there. Now the so called “reformers” seem to take that idea even further and ensure that all children do not get a quality education through standardized testing that affects the children and teachers and pouring tons of money into private charters that only accept and maintain a small percentage of children. I left teaching when I was convinced that the teachers were to be robots and that their input was not wanted.
LikeLike
quoting: “For far too many years we allowed union representatives to dig in their heels…We tolerated teachers who should have been quickly removed, protecting with union rights instead of taking a stand for a high level of professionalism.”
In response, I would ask, did we as teachers join the professional organizations (not just the unions?) I worked about 10 years before unions came into the state but we had a professional standards committee even then …. and we were encouraged to join the IRA — International reading association, or the CEC Council for Exceptional Children not just to pay the dues but to find out what the best practices were as recommended by these professionals and not just reading their journal once a month but actually seeking out (which my principal encouraged). Unions serve a more narrow purpose but we did have a professional standards group – it could have been more active (at least during my tenure I would say that). There were some forward thinking superintendents who actually created staff development in cities to work on these issues… I met Dick Wallace in the City of Fitchburg MA (one of the least affluent cities in the state) and he later went on to Pittsburg and created staff development functions as part of the teacher evaluation system…. some cities were able to do this if they had enough R&D money even if states fell behind and became more regulatory. One of the original intents for Regional Service Centers (RESAs) in the states was to offer the staff development on a regional level especially where the universities and colleges were not available but this worked out differently in each state…. and not to the best of standards in every location. The “National Practice File” was an early attempt to share across states through a diffusion network and later the What Works Clearinghouse but this needs to be a dual function not just top down but bottom up (enervated by active teaching force with some support for the R&D needed)
LikeLike
Whatever happened to the role of the Regional Education Labs? Have the ALL sold out EVERYTHING??
LikeLike
Regional labs survive only if they do the bidding of the Gates/Obama Administration filtered through Duncan (USDE) and with the approval of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) one of the major PR agencies for amplifying on and helping to implement the mandates in legislation such as ESEA, and initiative such as the Teacher Incentive Grant Program (pay-for-performance), and RttT legislation.
In addition to supporting the administrative agenda and legacy legislation such as ESEA, the IES and some of the labs are co-opted into doing research and reviews of research only because the topic (often dubious) has been been given a high press profile through a great PR campaign.
For example, I have just finished a review of three reports from regional labs that address SLOs (student learning objectives) as the alternative means of choice for evaluating teachers of “untested subjects” where VAM are not calculated. SLOs are a version of the business practice known as MBO for management-by-objectives, intended to increase the productivity of workers. The use of SLOs is promoted through the Reform Support Network (RSN) established to help states and districts implement RttT on a national scale.
These reports do not question publications and other resources designed to promote SLOs. The reports from the labs are supposed to “inform policy makers” about the current use of SLOs in teacher evaluation and “lessons learned.” One report–a review of the literature–says there is NO peer-reviewed research to support the use of SLOs for teacher evaluation. Even so, the policy is not really questioned except through a few suggestions for tweaking it.
All three reports are actually promoting pay-for-performance as well as the philosophy of education that SLOs affirms; namely direct instruction tailored to achieve predetermined, inflexible, and measurable goals. Teachers are assumed to be untrustworthy, inefficient, and ineffective in producing gains in student achievement at the rate needed to “Race to the Top.” SLOs reinforce the concept that resources and contexts have no bearing on what student and teachers can accomplish.
Bottom line, many reports from the regional labs are designed to provide a gloss of academic respectability to policies already decided.
LikeLike
Laura: thanks for the information
Ies. ed.gov has a state by state report on how these are being implemented. and they list these references
anything that has Hanushek name attached gives me the “creeps” because of his particular ideology.
references:
References
Community Training and Assistance Center. (2013). It’s more than money: Teacher Incen- tive Fund—Leadership for educators’ advanced performance. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Boston: Author.
Hanuschek, E., and Rivkin, S. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2): 267–271.
Kane, T., and Staiger, D. (2008). Estimating impacts on student achievement: An experimen- tal evaluation. NBER Working Paper No. 14607. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED503840
Race to the Top Technical Assistance Network. (2010). Measuring student growth for teach- ers in non-tested grades and subjects: A primer. Washington, DC: ICF International. Retrieved October 28, 2013, from http://nassauboces.org/cms/lib5/NY18000988/ Centricity/Domain/156/NTS__PRIMER_FINAL.pdf
Tyler, J. (2011). Designing high quality evaluation systems for high school teachers: Challeng- es and potential solutions. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. http://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED535653
LikeLike
Laura has provided insight into the top down strategy of A. Duncan’s policies. be prepared for more of the same because the A. duncan policy for special education has money set aside for a technical assistance network (just like the technical assistance network to preach “SLO’s” as Laura described above.
quote: ”
Scott Joftus
Scott Joftus is president of the education policy consulting firm Cross & Joftus, LLC. Joftus is also the senior strategic advisor and technical assistance provider of the Race to the Top Technical Assistance Network, a $43 million initiative funded by the U.S. Department of Education to help states implement major reforms and achieve dramatic improvements in student outcomes. Joftus also serves as an adjunct professor at The George Washington University’s Graduate School of Education and Human Development, where he teaches leadership, program evaluation, and education policy.”
so some firm will pick up 50 million to create a technical assistance center in special education to preach the same old, same old about these objectives that Laura cites…….. we’ve had that approach in special education for decades….
LikeLike
Reform Support Network
ICF was selected by the U.S. Department of Education to manage the Reform Support Network, which was designed to help states implement sweeping reforms in education policy and practice.
The RSN TA Network aims to build capacity to implement and sustain these reform efforts and achieve dramatic improvements in educational outcomes for all students. ICF will assist grantees in the four RSN targeted areas for improvement: adopting high-quality standards and assessments, developing effective data systems, recruiting and retaining great teachers and leaders, and turning around the lowest-performing schools.
The RSN TA Network works with states to build capacity to implement and sustain reform efforts and achieve dramatic improvements in educational outcomes for all students. The work of the RSN TA Network also identifies and shares promising and effective practices with the field, as well as facilitates collaboration across states and among the many education stakeholders implementing and supporting state reform efforts.
Over the course of the four-year contract, the RSN TA Network team will conduct the following major tasks:”
———————————–
looks like more and more of these coming down the pike…. millions of dollars$$$$$
another award to be given for special education technical assistance (to continue to do more of what Laura describes above)
LikeLike
And the award goes to:
quoting news release: “ICF International Awarded New $32.8 Million Contract with U.S. Department of Education
Fairfax, Virginia, January 11, 2012 –
ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI), a leading provider of consulting services and technology solutions to government and commercial clients, has been awarded a new contract by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences (IES) to operate the Regional Education Laboratory (REL) Mid-Atlantic. In addition, ICF has been named to lead the Coordinating Entity for the REL program. The combined contract has a value of $32.8 million and a term of five years.”
—————————————————-
I didn’t realize how the Labs and centers had been diverted into these channels until Laura pointed it out………
These contracts are really designed to “clean up”$$$$$ with high overhead, expensive consultants, a lot of airline travel $$$$ etc.
LikeLike
Ironically, the Regional Labs have a lot more options than they’ve used, and it’s indicative of their failure to lead that they’ve ignored them. For one, sterling, example, there are a lot more foundations than the Gates circle, and MacArthur, Ford, Barr, and several locals have invested substantial resources in ePortfolios as good, if not better, measures of student achievement than the Pearson exchange. Part of the problem is that not enough of those Labs bothered to look, and, with the insight of most tunnel-visioned bureaucrats, stayed with Duncan and the initial-obsessed mendacious metricians and tests when exploring better ways to describe students learning or teachers teaching. In Massachusetts, in spite of the local obsession with PARCC and the state Commissioner’s overt conflict of interest as national Chair, the same Education Reform act (of 1994 or so) that called for state testing (the MCAS), also called for portfolios. Back then these were seen as ways around too narrow a testing corridor for graduating bilingual and disabled students (which still does work, incidentally), but the law is … as Duncan would say … still the law, and computerizing those portfolios involves students and teachers in much more useful mutual and collegial assessment activities than the bubble tests.
So, I really do wonder what’s wrong with the EDC’s and the IES agencies beyond this kind of tunnel vision. If funders fund it, and academics (from Harvard and Johns Hopkins for that example) publish it, why don’t the researchers bother researching it? Or are they all such superficial whores that they only pick up low lying (lying nonetheless) fruit?
LikeLike
Joe: thanks for the insight and for bringing me up to date…. I am on the 15% left/left liberal side and am having trouble picking a governor…. I think you are accurate about the “i smell mendacity here” …..
LikeLike
Very poignant. However I also disagree with this statement:
“We tolerated teachers who should have been quickly removed, protecting with union rights instead of taking a stand for a high level of professionalism.”
It’s very sad that this teacher has fallen victim to the same misinformation about unions that has caused the public to be less than sympathetic to them.
Unions are not responsible for hiring or firing their members. That is the job and the right of the administration. I’m not sure how protecting the rights of an individual to have his day in court goes against “taking a stand for a high level of professionalism.”
The thing is, people in groups are not “all in” on every single topic. That is the problem with levels of government, and unions–as democratic republics–are not exempt. If an individual is unhappy with his union, he needs to speak up, but he also needs to understand how processes work. The union isn’t going to hold his hand every step of the way–he needs to do his part, too. By getting involved, asking questions, learning about the differences between legislative and regulatory policies, etc. he is doing his part to represent and be represented.
LikeLike
Nevertheless NC doesn’t have a teacher’s union and likely won’t (not one with bargaining rights). So we gain the perspective we by do watching unions from the outside. It’s a nonissue in NC. NCAE tried to become a union and it failed.
LikeLike
I disagree with the basic premise that WE teachers allowed this to happen. The corporate world has been strategizing for a very long time on how to ensure that their reforms are definitively put through via large resources of money and political buy off sponsored by our very own Supreme Court. I would hardly start blaming public school teachers. But I read something the other day and it made me think… I was reading an article on minimum wage laws. Apparently, anyone who has no control over what they do at the work place under federal law is required to overtime. Professionals have not fallen under this category because they are given titles which operate as overtime pay escape clauses within the law. Teachers used to be professionals and used to have control over many of the things you rightly point out in your article – creating tests, finals, etc.. But now, teachers have absolutely no control over any of this at all – not even what or how or when anything is taught! So, maybe public school teachers have the right to overtime! Wow, if I logged in all the hours outside of the classroom that I put into my job…. I would have one heck of a paycheck! Should we teachers on a national level start keeping a daily log (as lawyers in law firms do) of billable hours and make a request for overtime? Would that not be something! I only suggest this as it might highlight that teachers want professional autonomy to be restored to public education. I would choose autonomy over overtime. I would not be wasting valuable time on nonsensical required stuff! Teachers want the dialogue to address the real issues that hamper education… POVERTY. I am not asking for heaps of money. I am asking to be treated like a professional who is always self reflecting on my practice (and “thanks” without the help of Charlotte Danielson). I want to use my expertise in my area of specialization as I see fit before my students. I don’t want to perform like a robot following top-down dictates that do not work with my way of doing things or the students before me. And I certainly do not want to be penalized for not following top down directives that do not help me to be the best teacher I can be! Public school teachers perhaps now fall into the category of non professionals who have no autonomy in the classroom… pay us overtime according to our logged billable hours or give us autonomy! Hmmm food for thought.
LikeLike
Speaking of Danielson, I view evaluation reform like a strong, synthetic pharmaceutical that is being forced down everyone’s throat regardless of whether or not a person is “sick” or “healthy.”
I have never seen a process that was so time-consuming, convoluted and nerve-wracking as the new evaluation model. The irony is that my administrator comes to the same conclusions about my performance as he did before this. Apart from the hours of work and the funds needed for its implementation, the stress the new evaluation model causes is very unnecessary.
LikeLike
It’s funny I just went to a Danielson professional development and the instructor (from the Danielson headquarters) did NOT use the Danielson method to teach us. hmmmm does it only work with children, or doesn’t it work at all?
LikeLike
How many times have we seen professional development modeling exactly what teachers should not do. I’ve even seen it in a presentation on using manipulative a in a math class. Geesh!
LikeLike
Yup– very common phenomenon that those why try to educate educators cannot teach themselves out of a paper bag.
LikeLike
LG indeed! And responding to cary444 who states…”How many times have we seen professional development modeling exactly what teachers should not do…”
As a matter of fact I went to the Teaching and Learning Conference in DC and none other than Danielson herself did what every teacher knows not to do for her session. She gave a powerpoint which was a virtual read of everything on each of the powerpoint frames. Well, she interjected a canned attempt to add humor here and there. Then to make matters worse she was plugging revisions to her new edition which was to be forthcoming. Then she casually mentioned that she would only have time for one or two questions! Fortunately the first person who stood up was from NYC and asked her why she stood silent when NYC teachers were being ranked erroneously and some even fired using her model of evaluation. She feigned ignorance and said, “I never intend my evaluation to part of ranking…” So all I could think (and I sure most of the audience) .. why don’t you speak out forcefully against the abuse of your evaluation. My guess is she is too busy touring the country with her “product”. I sat in a a large auditorium where Duncan spoke. She came in late and sat in a row right in front of me. She was texting the whole time. Way to go Danielson – not exactly a role model to anyone.
LikeLike
So much for teacher driven paradigms.
LikeLike
You tell em, Rene! Lenny rants that a lot… that we teachers ran… you bet we did for our sanity and our lives because there was no one organizing us in 50 states and 15,588 districts. It was a carefully planned vast conspiracy of monied interests and great power, and teachers,like doctors, never expected such an attack.
Now, 2 decades later, this blog reveals how clueless the teachers out there NOW are of the debacle tha came before in NYC and LAUSD to mention just two. On this page, is my response and the links to the truth, but I bet few teachers actually go to the links which I embedded, to see the reality… that this is OLD stuff… it happened to me 20 years ago, and ended my career 16 years ago when I was a famous teacher at the apex of my success… but then you know this dear…
keep on fighting for us, Rene…
LikeLike
I’m sure glad he teaches math and not social studies. The basic organization of all teachers unions has been professional associations – which the NEA was long before – after some serious resistance – it got into only in response to highly politicized education policies. If he thinks it’s a failure of unions he ought to work within his local to change.
It’s money – “greed is good” is really bad policy. And teachers, school boards, universities, publishers, or the internet are all only as good as their mission beyond the dollar.
LikeLike
Absolutely. My state association has a website that includes an extensive array of teacher and para-professional support articles. As well, the organization provides professional development as a requirement of its county offices.
I suppose it’s just easier to blame unions for all the things they cannot do than to actually learn about all the services they provide.
LikeLike
LG: I have enjoyed and learned from all of your comments here… thank you. In my experience the staff development or inservice and even college courses for graduate professionals when aimed at elementary teachers were always “double down on phonics” as it became more and more of a “fetish”…. there are cults that are in the coursework, and fads. Other offerings would concentrate on “applied behavior analysis ABA ” and such… which get carried to extreme. Only through exposure at conferences that were well attended by secondary teachers did I learn about the concepts embedded in the curriculum from an AP social studies teacher who told me to read Cows, Pigs and Witches ; or another secondary teacher who would tell me to learn more about Jeremy Bentham instead of just classical republicanism and it was at these conferences that I learned about Howard Zinn and the People’s History ….. one state governor even banned books by Zinn in the schools. You will tell me thiss is a lie but maybe you have met it in your union work? A superintendent , when he would want to excoriate the women for some perceived fault, would take them down to the little girls’ room and sit them on primary chairs to give his lecture. I see a lot of union work that needs to be done on the social justice issues still in terms of awareness of elementary teachers… now I will probably hear from a lot of the women who think this perspective is not accurate and Ii know it is not part of everyone’s experience but I do see education as “liberating” a person if not offering a more liberal or tolerant viewpoint for life.
LikeLike
Yes–a union is only as good as its members. Active members make a strong local, active locals influence the national.
LikeLike
A very passionate plea. I think teachers have developed a kind of learned helplessness over time. It doesn’t feel like we really can change anything, that if we do speak up about it we may be targeted.I do think if we had some kind of grassroots campaign, we might be able to wake people up a bit. It’s like the mom’s groups that are shaking up the NRA right now-no one else has been able to do that. We need to organize something like that for teachers who seek change.
LikeLike
Texas Teacher: that is the purpose of unions. To fight for working people, to stand up for you because you will be fired if you stand up alone, to amass resources to elect people who are on the side of the working people, not the 1%.
LikeLike
Diane, but when those unions do not work for the teachers, what’s the point? Listening to many across the country in union states, many have stated that unions have sold out and are believers in Common Core (Randy Weingarten), are taking money from education reformers, all in addition to shutting out the rank and file. So how can they be working for the people?
LikeLike
Diane.
You are correct in theory. As our political theater plays out in LA, we can see how Weingarten easily manipulates the rank and file through her iron fist control of the UFT. As a Newark teacher, I am painfully aware of the consequences of compromise with the devil.
LikeLike
Texasteacher presents precisely my reason to live in Massachusetts.
LikeLike
I don’t agree that we are feeling helpless, but I agree with you that, at least here in Texas, we would be “targeted” if we spoke up.
We are non union here, and we have very little day here: it is frightening how little.
I spoke up this year when they wanted to take out a bunch of my lower level readers and stick them on an awful blended learning program for 1/2 my class period, WHILE telling me that I could somehow make sure that we caught up privately on the teaching (50%) that they would miss. Some of these children were socially promoted and I used stats to substantiate my opinion that they would be better off in class with me.
I got my way, and some of them improved a ton with my “antiquated” teaching, but I have earned the ire of a higher up at the Ed Center. She was not happy with being resisted, and I am sure that she was hoping that I would fail.
I am not an advanced degrees professional who is going to let my kids sit in my class on a glorified video game, “shooting” synonyms, when we could be learning rich vocabulary while reading Dickens, in scaffolded reading if great texts!
Hear. Me. Roar.:)
LikeLike
IF he really does teach I’m not sure what he’s talking about, teaching in NC. Some parts of this letter are based on 1st hand experiences so I’m not sure why he talks about unions and difficulties getting rid of bad teachers. None of those job protections exist in NC.
LikeLike
Pardon errors. Auto correct.
LikeLike
Umm .. North Carolina, like my state, South Carolina, is a right to work state. There is no no teachers union. There are associations affiliated with NEA as well as stand alone groups, but no unions. No bargaining.
What I hear is this ingrained antipathy toward “unions” that is so prevalent in the South, despite lower wages and working conditions, where so many vote against their own interests.
I wonder if this teacher has joined educators and others in Raleigh for Moral Mondays?
LikeLike
You are right it is ingrained and it is antipathy…. and it is not just in the south; it is everywhere. I try to support my young family members who are members of machinist’s union etc (in Seattle, CA, TX, OK) …. their fathers, my brothers saw their unions devastated and their pensions eroded …. one of my friends who is 75 had her house “bugged” by the previous version of FBI/NSA because her mom organized dock workers and they were called every name in the book….. My father was gassed in World War I when he was an ambulance driver in France and the men who “marched” on Washington were turned back by their own government….
It is ingrained and it has become part of the divisive rhetoric to split off the middle class from the other “working” members of the public with all kinds of hateful , mean-spirited intentions. Do you ever look at the teaching materials that come out of the Howard Zinn institute? I have a current article I am reading about a younger couple who met at the “Howard Zinn” door and married and she is now a Rabbi and he is an advocate for solar energy in Israel…. Howard Zinn’s books were ripped out of the schools in one state and then the state governor went on to president of University where he had appointed his own board…. this is crony capitalism. He was the one who wanted all the Howard zinn books burned (nb… you can tell I am a Bernie Sanders follower… and I am in that 15% of the ultra left – left but that’s where i want to be) Thanks for your comment…!!!!!
What I hear is this ingrained antipathy toward “unions” that is so prevalent in the South, despite lower wages and working conditions, where so many vote against their own interests.
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
LikeLike
Perhaps the AFT and NEA could have been quicker to respond and stronger in their responses in defense of state and local control of education and more vocal in their criticism of and opposition to NCLB, RTT and CCSs. But as long as states can threaten individual teachers that they will rescind their teaching credentials / certification, I would not place the blame on teachers not having spoken out on the corporate “reform” that is occurring.
LikeLike
Again…understanding the difference between legislation and regulation is essential here. When state agencies force policy down the throats of the professional masses, unions have no say. Governmental departments do not listen to unions and state board members do not listen to unions. That would be against the law. Only individuals can lobby the state boards of education.
In regard to opposition of the aforementioned policies, I agree that it is about time that the organizations speak out. I think there is plenty of evidence now to take an informed position.
LikeLike
LG, in your attempted defense of the unions you are making a very poor case for membership.
Why should anyone expend hard-earned money for dues when the unions can’t do anything, as you’ve so helpfully pointed out?
There is precious little I can offer new teachers as an incentive to join now other than a very minor discount on life insurance, which isn’t exactly a must-have to 20-year olds. Outside of that and a few other discounts offered here and there, I’m left empty-handed.
The union can’t protect you from VAM, the Danielson abomination, vindictive principals, rude and hateful state and district walk-throughs, ever-rising costs of increasingly worthless benefits, attacks on your future pension fund or even your eligibility to be a part of the pension plan (ended this year in FL, replaced by a worthless 401K plan), persecution over taking sick leave and personal days (a pet project of our new ex-military superintendent), constant testing with no time to teach, pay cuts for 8 straight years, loss of due process and ‘tenure’ so that we are all at-will employees now, unfair labor practices such as taking away your planning or lunch time for mandated meetings, trainings, testing, etc.
BUT you should spend a big chunk of your measly check every two weeks to join the union because . . . because . . . because . . . Randi Weingarten and Dennis Van Roekel support CCSS and VAM and are ant-militancy of unions!
Yeah, that’s the ticket! Join us and pay us to destroy your profession, watch helplessly as you lose your job and your teaching credentials and your education degrees are rendered worthless, and we will occasionally write a letter to a minor government functionary asking if they will pretty please leave office a little bit early? Maybe?
It’s not working any more. And not all of us live in strong union states yet the Unity caucus is controlling the AFT convention and Chicago, Los Angeles, and MA are the only players anyone cares about.
The unions are not beneficial to the rank and file anymore and I am working to change that. I’m getting lots of private support and I’ll see how far that goes in changing the paradigm entirely. It’s time to let go of the useless old and welcome in the changing new.
LikeLike
Chris,
Are you forming a new organization?
LikeLike
“Why should anyone expend hard-earned money for dues when the unions can’t do anything, as you’ve so helpfully pointed out?”
Unions cannot lobby government departments, but they can lobby law-makers to make informed decisions on legislation that can shape future regulations. There was no public discourse for the Common Core–these “standards” were adopted by governor-appointed state departments which, again, unions cannot lobby. Nobody knew what the CC was until it started doing the damage. The CC needed to be tested and studied, which did not start to happen until after the fact.
This is a huge battle in the war, but it is not over yet.
“There is precious little I can offer new teachers as an incentive to join now other than a very minor discount on life insurance, which isn’t exactly a must-have to 20-year olds. Outside of that and a few other discounts offered here and there, I’m left empty-handed.”
Your union is only as strong as its membership allows it to be. There is no magic bullet. To believe that the union is going to cure all that ails you is to oversimplify the purpose of a collective unit. Unions play many roles for their members. Two of the most important areas of advocacy are assisting members with due process and offering professional support. If you cannot make a case for how important it is to have an organization willing to help its members when they have no power to help themselves, you are setting unions back.
Because of the diversity of needs, not every member is going to understand this, especially those who are just setting out in the world. Getting support from those early in their careers has always been difficult. You need to find ways to connect with these younger professionals. Building member relations is of utmost importance. Building community support through positive presence at events is also key. Not everyone understands the big picture–it’s important to build your membership by putting a face on the representation.
“It’s not working any more. And not all of us live in strong union states yet the Unity caucus is controlling the AFT convention and Chicago, Los Angeles, and MA are the only players anyone cares about.
The unions are not beneficial to the rank and file anymore and I am working to change that. I’m getting lots of private support and I’ll see how far that goes in changing the paradigm entirely. It’s time to let go of the useless old and welcome in the changing new.”
I cannot and will not speak for the AFT as I have never been a member of any AFT affiliate. From all reports, the AFT is in turmoil. I can only speak for my state NEA-affiliated organization which is strong because it strives to work within the best interests of its members. No union is perfect, but it is a democratic organization. Its power is in its membership–if the power has shifted, it is up to the members to take it back instead of work against it. The CTU did this.
I realize that you are bitter, but I implore you to stand in solidarity with the concept of unity. If it requires you to enact changes within your organization, then work toward that goal. Unions are very complicated organizations, but above all, they are necessary to advocate for their membership.
You don’t cultivate the trees by destroying the forest. The collective voice is a necessity in this line of work, and we all need to be advocates for the rights to organize.
LikeLike
LG, how can I stand in solidarity with someone who dismisses my concerns, ignores my critiques, and calls me “bitter”?
I’m not bitter. I’m mad as hell and I’m not taking it anymore.
I’m tired of being told by my fellow rank and file members that I should just “work harder” or through some magical wishing become them and have the good union support they claim to have. I’ve been working for a long time and I am working within the accepted channels and basically treading water.
The AFT and NEA are broken, seemingly beyond repair.
Yes, NJ Teacher, I am thinking about forming a new organization that will serve as an alternative to the NEA and AFT.
Since LG and other old guard union members like to tell me, a 20+ year veteran of union work, that I need to work democratically to bring about the change I want that’s exactly what I’m doing.
I’m still in the classroom and plan to stay as long as I can so this is not something that is going to happen overnight but I am devoting a lot of time to researching what is working in other parts of the world right now.
LikeLike
Read my comment above and for goodness sakes go to the links I put there.
LikeLike
How am I ignoring your concerns?
LikeLike
Read my response WAY BACK ON THIS PAGE, and GO TO THE LINKS…. IT IS ALL THERE… the reality…the truth… mot MY truth….THE truth.
LikeLike
Oh, and LG I have no idea what you mean when you say “unions can’t lobby”. ?
http://hechingerreport.org/content/unions-lobby-power-remains-unmatched_11399/
LikeLike
LG, I just received a check from my local for being the recruiter of the semester (from Jan. to June). Thanks for the lesson in “how to recruit” though.
Florida is the 4th largest school district in the country, after NY, CA, and TX.
Our union is an amalgamation of the AFT and NEA.
My members were and are extremely nervous, angry, and confused about VAM and the fact that our state law removes your teaching credential if you have 2 low ratings. There are many, many teachers approaching that threshold this year and they face termination, loss of license, and will be unable to reenter the teaching profession in this state by law.
We don’t have time to play the games of Randi’s Unity caucus preventing Chicago from passing an anti-common core resolution or the NEA’s assembly silencing anyone who makes the higher-ups uncomfortable.
Our state unions strategy was to sue in court on behalf of the teachers whose low VAM ratings were a farce because they were based upon students the teachers had never even taught.
We lost. The judge agreed with everything we said about unfairness and absurdity but the FEA chose to go after the constitutionality of the law and the judge, a Bush appointee, said the law was constitutional.
Our next step? A few more years of appeals.
In the meantime hundreds, if not thousands, of teachers will receive their 2nd low VAM rating based upon the political yoyo of the FCAT cut scores and they will no longer be teachers in FL come next June/July.
Several hundred more schools received D and F grades this year and 300 now face mandatory longer school days and state control.
We are a sinking ship.
Not bitter.
Desperate for help.
As is Newark. And Camden. And Philly. And New Orleans. And North Carolina. And Detroit. And several other Michigan districts. And Indiana. And Colorado. And I could go on and on and on.
Tell me, LG, how much of this has been on the agenda of the NEA or AFT national assemblies?
We have the NEA calling for Duncan to resign. We have the AFT maybe allowing a vote which the UFT Unity Caucus is expected to veto.
What is the plan for helping us? What is the strategy? What were/are the resolutions? They are not there. And they won’t be. We will fade silently into the past as the band plays on at the NEA and AFT.
Or so they think.
LikeLike
Chris:
I never asserted that “unions can’t lobby” legislatures. They cannot lobby governor-appointed departments of education. That is the difference between legislative and regulatory issues.
Regulations are the department-crafted rules–the details–of how the legislation is to be put into use. Legislators across the country have been putting out bill after bill of “reform concepts” without actually having a plan on how these changes will be enacted. It is mighty convenient that the devil is in the regulatory details and unions cannot influence government agencies to make the regulations that are friendly to them. Actually, it is a good thing that laws prohibit any organization from lobbying or influencing state departments.
Our biggest enemy is the network of private and political interests who are controlling the messages that “inform” our state school board members in policy. In my state, our SBO members are appointed volunteers, the majority of whom have zero experience in education. We cannot collectively lobby them, but we can contact them as individuals. My state union facilitates this contact but cannot provide any kind of support to them in exchange for their support of the organization’s issues. That is against the law, as it should be.
I apologize if you felt my comment about you being “bitter” seemed insulting. It was meant to commiserate, not instigate. Your experience is vital to this message, however, for every complaint about the unions I have heard, there is the looming spectre of “life without unions” hanging over our heads in other comments here. People seem to forget their own roles in what has happened to education in so many states. Shooting themselves in the foot by bashing their organizations is not the way to fix things. Infiltrating the leadership as the CTU did is a great way to take back your organization. Get involved and go deeper if you want to see a change.
Although others can certainly make their case, I strongly feel that my union has not abandoned me. I only wish that it can expedite its positions and actions on the issues that are affecting all of us. Countering bad policies is a process that takes time and careful action. Unions are damned if they sit back and damned if they come off as too aggressive. Slow and steady seems to always be the mantra, but for some people, it’s not the way they think unions should proceed. No organization is going to be all things to its members.
I feel that leadership in my state association has gotten a bit more savvy as of late. The union is watching what is unfolding in other states very closely. We have actions on a weekly basis now. I have decided to get more involved during this critical time. I have and will continue to volunteer for committees that aid in supporting the organization–I have no problem going to headquarters and voicing my dissent. I have on several occasions. I choose to work with the organization instead of against it.
The truth is that you do have a voice, and if you feel you do not, what can you do within the organization to change the organization? We all were blind-sided a few years ago by a lot of the changes, but we know better now. So finding your role in this fight is vital. However, if you feel your organization is too far gone and that you are helpless, it makes no sense to figure out where it went wrong if you are going to abandon it. The damage has been done. If your union is no longer representing you, by all means, organize your own, but I cannot, will not, allow this country to dissolve its unions–I will fight until I expire before I let that happen.
LikeLike
Well there’s our point of agreement, LG. I will fight to retain the right to unionize and work in solidarity for the betterment of all.
I’m very sad that the NEA and UFT are standing by and watching huge school districts like Florida and Louisiana and Michigan and North Carolina sink beneath the waves while they debate how great the CCSS are.
If nothing else, I hope the threat of an alternative makes them wake up to the reality that their days are numbered. On an earlier thread there are articles that show that Randi Weingarten served on at the Broad Superintendent’s Academy faculty and sat on the board of the Green Dot Charter Management Corp.
That kind of selling out is what makes my blood boil. Randi will experience no harm when my colleagues see their careers and their lives destroyed over VAM.
As I said earlier, and the band plays on . . . .
LikeLike
Again…read my long response on this page and DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GO TO THE LINKS… see what they did in NYC a decade ago it’s the process they took around the country… and the UNIONS WERE COMPLICIT…we need the u noons, but we the teachers need to send the bums who let his happen out the door so the unions represent us… too much chatter and not enough cation here.
GRASSROOTS AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH WAITING FOR SUPERMAN
LikeLike
Chris, can your union appeal the VAM ruling?
Are there any education-friendly state candidates or community organizers who can put pressure on the legislature to amend the laws? In my state’s legislature, we have a bill in the works to slow down the PARCC and its ties to teacher evaluation for two years while a task force examines its propriety. It has garnered the support of the legislatures on both sides of the aisle. It’s most certain that our governor will veto it, but we won’t stop trying to get it out there. My state union lobbied heavily to get education-friendly candidates elected last year. We learned our lesson of four years ago when all of the reform nonsense began unfolding. I see my union as formerly behind the eight-ball but currently chomping at the bit. I cannot imagine abandoning it now.
LikeLike
After what I have seen in NYC, Chicago and Newark, I have little respect for the AFT under Weingarten. “Repurposing” veteran educators as day-to-day substitutes? Crafting a contract for merit-pay? All bad ideas.
Was the AFT’s position on these matters based in incompetence, the folly of underestimating the “reformers,” or pure, un-adulterated politics? I cannot say, nor will I defend the actions of the AFT toward their members in these locals. It is despicable. The cancer needs to be cut out, but the patient (collective bargaining units) needn’t die in the process.
Part of the reason I am here on this blog is because of a news article in the NYT that showed a picture of the VAM equation used to “evaluate” teachers in NY. I was horrified.
LikeLike
Yes, Susan I am in agreement with you, also, in regard to what happened in NY. I have been following that story since this blog started.
It seemed like the now ATRs were “taken into custody” and forced to work as temps like sheep being led to live in deplorable conditions. I talk about this with my fellow members when they appear complacent about what’s going on. It can happen to any of us, but so many of us live in our own little worlds.
What happened to the veterans was beyond wrong, and the membership needs to correct this. How has the UFT decided to proceed? schoolgal who posts regularly on here is understandably very passionate about this. I haven’t heard about any mass overhaul of the UFT since then, but then again, the AFT is not my union so I don’t get regular updates short of anything posted here.
Still, I cannot and will not abandon the principals of collective bargaining. The alternative would lay waste to public education and the middle class but quick.
LikeLike
My niece is a principal in San Francisco. There are wonderful administrators int hs country. Th issue is accountability to the law… Due process cannot be obliterated by a principal with an agenda if the union enforced grievance procedures.
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LAWLESS BEHAVIOR IS THE ONLY WAY A CULTURE, ANY CULTURE THRIVES. The administrative culture in the schools in NYC is ‘anything goes’. Principals from hell are legendary in The NY Teacher. The union let it happen! period.
LikeLike
That is very interesting Chris. Watching the AFT circus from the sidelines has been upsetting to me. I am ready to throw in the towel. Constant disrespect of my knowledge and for me personally is taking an emotional toll on me. Unfortunately, there are bills to be paid and my options are limited.
LikeLike
Sorry for the wrong spelling. I should have typed “principles” before and not “principals.”
“ACCOUNTABILITY FOR LAWLESS BEHAVIOR IS THE ONLY WAY A CULTURE, ANY CULTURE THRIVES.”
Agreed. However this also depends on who is making the laws. Perhaps accountability for unjust behavior is the only way a culture thrives.
“The administrative culture in the schools in NYC is ‘anything goes’. Principals from hell are legendary in The NY Teacher.”
Did this happen overnight or was it a situation that was progressively getting worse? Giuliani was the first more recent enemy of the teachers. I remember my ex’s uncle talking about how terrible he was treating educators during his tenure as mayor. We all know that Bloomberg was even worse. I’m curious as to how the UFT members responded to the efforts to take down their profession at the onset. The mistreatment of NYC teachers by the mayor’s office is long and storied–so how did it get this far without the accountability you mentioned above?
“The union let it happen! period.”
I’m assuming you mean “the union leadership” and not the actual union itself. You can argue semantics here, but I don’t think it serves the right purpose. The union is its members. Leadership is chosen by and always under the scrutiny of the organization’s members. Therefore one needs to be specific as to who did what and let what happen. As well the union has a responsibility to police itself. How many years have passed since schools began to close putting veterans into the ATR “substitute” pool and what has the membership done to hold the leaders accountable for not taking appropriate and effective action on the issue?
I have often wondered how things could have gotten so bad in NYC.
So let me ask you a few direct questions that don’t require links–person to person. Do you believe that leaders were naively negotiating in good faith and failed to see the harm that the admins’ “anything goes” mentality could do? Or do you truly believe that the union leaders decided to “screw the membership” by making back room deals? If you believe the latter, who is profiting from these deals, and why haven’t they been held accountable in a court of law?
As observers, NYC’s neighbors have learned that responsibility runs wide and deep. Hopefully, no other locals will make the same mistakes, but apathy runs wider and deeper…all the more reason for people to get heavily involved in their unions.
LikeLike
. You said: I’m curious as to how the UFT members responded to the efforts to take down their profession at the onset. The mistreatment of NYC teachers by the mayor’s office is long and storied–so how did it get this far without the accountability you mentioned above?”
Curious? R U kidding?
You imagine that any of us knew what was happening? The media did not report it. The union reps never reported the attacks. Are you that naive? I think you enjoy hearing yourself and imagine that you are the smartest one in the room.
You waste our time here.
I think curious is the wrong adjective… ignorant, confused or just plain argumentative comes to mind.
LikeLike
I think ed reform capitalists along with govt were very strategically systematic and wanted to find a way to weaken unions. So.. what better way than to completely starve school districts for funds (such that we have situations like Philly) and to dangle funding from a RTTT/common core carrot. So then many union bosses (who regrettably lack moral courage) do “bad things” – put simply. – to get this money. They are willing to sell out teacher protections that should also be noted in the end are helpful to students and what for… for scraps of money here and there that are left over from RTTT once all the consultants, common core materials etc are paid out. Fortunately there are still some union heads (far and few) who actually represent the teachers and fight this tooth and nail – Karen Lewis is among them and let us hope the newly elected MA person..
LikeLike
If the teacher union doesn’t speak for teachers, whom do you think they represent? My union is front and center against the Kansas legislature’s attacks on public school teachers. The union is not opposed to ineffective teachers being replaced. The union does support due process for teachers. What teachers should be removed quickly? How many ineffective teachers do you work with? At my district, 99% of the teachers are hard-working professionals who take great pride in what they do. I’m proud to be a union member and proud of the work that the teachers in the union are doing on my behalf.
LikeLike
The locals are where the action takes place, because that’s where working classroom teachers are actually in charge. It’s at the state, and more so for the national level, that leadership often gets out of touch of what’s happening among the troops.
It seems that the power at the state and national level corrupts the thinking of union leaders so they stop representing the membership and start pushing their own biased agendas—and maybe lobbyists play a roll in that corrupt, wrong headed thinking.
I’m currently reading an advanced galley proof of “The Teacher Wars, A History of America’s Most Embattled Profession” by Dana Goldstein—the book will be released this September—and this has happened before, the disconnect between leadership at the state and national levels, and this is because those leaders become to chummy with the enemy in addition to using their bully pulpit at the top to often push personal agendas that may be wrong headed thinking. I’m on page 188 of 274.
The only heroes in this book that covers 175 years of public education in the U.S. are the classroom teachers and some of the parents. Nothing the teachers, as a group, do is their fault. Anything that goes wrong in public education was because of state and national leaders in government, the private sector and the teacher unions, and it is a complex history rife with back stabbing and manipulation as an endless string of gurus jump into the pot and cause even more problems with their wrong-headed thinking.
LikeLike
I am an educator in a “Right to Work” state, Louisiana. We don’t have unions and we have fallen to the same ALEC driven Deforms as everyone else. I have often commented here that we public school teachers are rule followers. My coworkers here will complain, but rarely actually do anything. Some of us tried protesting at the state capital at the beginning, but to no avail. The reality is, that there was no way we were going to stop this train. The agenda was set in motion by powerful people long before we ever saw it coming. Some of us saw the signs, but no one could imagine it would get this bad. When Diane first started this blog, there were a few of us who found refuge here. Now the numbers have grown rapidly and the word is spreading like wildfire. I agree that as professionals, we have allowed the Deformers to treat us with disrespect. No other educated profession is treated as we have been in recent times. Many of us have multiple degrees/certifications, and/ or advanced degrees. Yet here in Louisiana we have Boy Wonder, John White, just out of the playpen, making ridiculous decisions that make no sense. It is all a greedy money grab that has nothing to do with the education of our children. A Faustian Bargain of grand design? The same scenario is playing out across the nation. I hope the tide is turning, but the damage has been done to a whole generation of children. This generation will become the leaders of our nation soon. How will history judge us?
LikeLike
“There was a day when teaching was considered a profession. As a profession, those who taught were trusted with the education and the evaluation of the student. I grew up in schools that worked that way. Many of you did as well.”
Actually, this is a myth that has never existed in the United States. It may have existed in pockets—as the teacher in North Caroline shares from their own personal experience—but overall, it never existed across the United States.
I suggest that the teacher from North Carolina read “The Teacher Wars, A History of America’s Most Embattled Profession” by Dana Goldstein, when the book comes out this September to learn what I’m talking about. While the teacher unions are not innocent, they are not the cause of what is happening today.
I think when this teacher has read that book, they will have no choice but to agree with what Ravtich says. This issue is complex and the “accountability movement” based on test scores is the evil demon that’s always been lurking in the shadows of public education wanting its day in the sun to devour teachers and children in mass.
Blaming what happen on teacher unions is exactly what the fake education reformers want as they pit us against each other by manufacturing a false crises that never would have existed without them pushing it.
What I have already learned from “The Teacher Wars” (with 106 pages left to read) is that the true advocates of children are mostly parents and teachers and not the nation’s religious, corporate or public leaders who are often driven by other forces than the best interests of children and the future of the United States as a democracy.
And once parents and teachers unite with a common cause to save public education and stupor teachers in the classroom, we will drive these devils back int the shadows where they belong—hopefully behind bars.
LikeLike
I agree. Parents are the key to winning this war and taking back public education. Once they begin to understand, first hand, the harm that is being done to their children, they will begin to speak up. When it finally hits home with the middle class, and soccer moms, they will show their strength. The problem is that children growing up in poverty rarely have a voice. Public school educators would be wise to partner with the parents and form their own army to put public education back in the hands of the community tax payers…where it belongs. We have allowed powerful corporate money to talk for us for too long.
LikeLike
Bridget, I think parents are a key, but not the only one. It’s the community, the voters. Of course, if parents and educators voted together to get the right people in, they could make a difference.x
But let’s face it, rarely has education been he issue that has won or lost elections. So no matter who gets elected, they are still susceptible to the corporate and other lobbying pressures.
LikeLike
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and argument that is civil and intelligent as is yours, is what makes this site so valuable…. but you are missing a point because you are unaware of the devastation the union allowed to happen int the BIGGEST of the fifteen thousand, almost 16 thousand districts in the country.
I write this, and have been saying this for years, because the ONLY way for teachers to regain the voice –that they MUST HAVE in order for real learning to occur in their practice (yes professional practice) — will be when the CRUX of the problem is identified and fixed… when teachers get ACTIVE and vote out the complicit, corrupted people in the union, so that the union becomes their legal representative for the law of DUE PROCESS, as the contract spells out.
The unions across America looked the other way. Because it is too expensive and too lengthy for teachers to sue in the courts.
http://blog.ebosswatch.com/2013/05/one-womans-legal-fight-against-workplace-bullying/
The UNION is the LAW for teachers my dear, and the top-down administrators that run th show NOW are lawless because they are unaccountable for the most egregious behavior… not unlike the banisters who brought down the nations wealth.
It IS the UNION”S corruption that spelled the end of the Institution of Education in America, and with the help of the media that they owned in full, enabled Gates/Broad/Walton/Koch/Rhee/Klein and clones to end the practice of pedagogy by silencing the voice of those dedicated and talented Americans who just happened to chose teaching as a career.
Judge for yourself by reading the stories of all those the teachers in the past decade who learned there was NO ACCESS TO THE LAW OF THE LAND FOR AMERICANS WHO HAPPEN TO BE TEACHERS: go to
http://www.endteacherabuse.org or read how it was done in NYC, the template for the national debacle that is playing out in Illinois, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio etc, etc ad nauseum!
http://parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7534
or
2009/03/gotcha-squad-and-new-york-city-rubber.html
In NYC the largest in the country, and in LAUSD the second largest, the PROCESS plays out under the noses of nation at large.
In 1998, I discovered that all the awards and success, all the student and parents delighted in my best practice could not prevent the superintendent from subverting the education law for corporal punishment, which by definition meant physical, as the attorney who cost me 25k pointed out when we filed a lawsuit BECAUSE THE UNION HACK –the HEAD HONCHO for all of MANHATTAN, sat there at a meeting and allowed this administrator to find me guilty of corporal punishment,— mind you, with NO charges put out, no investigation and no hearing.
He said and I quote, what the union should have said: “even if Mrs Schartz had said the alleged remarks, it is not corporal punishment, discipline her or return her to the school.”
I was returned, but not to the curriculum I wrote and which The National Standards teams studied and celebrated. While in the teacher jail for 6 MONTHS as the union did nothing, they re-distributed 1000 books that I bought for an independent liberty, trashed my research with Harvard, threw out all the materials I gathered for 8 years to create my now-famous best practice and turned the room into a math classroom… while the union allowed them to put me in a closet to teach 6 skids a period, instead of the ENTIRE SEVENTH GRADE… as parents howled in distress (having chosen the school , in no small part, because of the phenomenal success of my students.
MY husband heard the superintendent of this silk-stocking NYC school district say to the principal who was savaging my reputation while I was teaching in a closet with no materials, “Don’t worry, the principal is always believed.” And, she was…MY union rep at the school site, and she LIED, because when I was gone, she got all my art materials and became the full-time art teacher– no longer a part=time art teacher… because I had integrated the Full state mandated, genuine, actual art curricula in my Communication Arts class.
Why not go to my author’s page, and see my resume:
http://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
and read “Bamboozle Them”
http://www.opednews.com/articles/BAMBOOZLE-THEM-where-tea-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-110524-511.html
and read the other essays I wrote about the subversion of the national conversation…years before GATES did his thing.
or read this one, which I wrote in 2004, describing the debacle and the Constitutional Scandal that happens when the union looks the other way…
http://www.speakingasateacher.com/SPEAKING_AS_A_TEACHER/No_Constitutional_Rights-_A_hidden_scandal_of_National_Proportion.html
or read these incredible and true pieces about LAUSD’s union and grasp what the unions have done to undermine the 5th and 6th Amendment:
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/03/lausd-and-utla–connecting-the-dots-of-blattant-corruption.html
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/lausd-and-utla-collude-to-end-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-teachers-part-2.html
http://www.perdaily.com/2013/10/why-does-utla-continue-to-support-lausds-violation-of-california-teacher-dismissal-process.html
Or watch this and count your lucky stars that you were not set up by your principal to be assaulted.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfNxj-O1DiI
LikeLike
Oh, the proverbial rug got pulled out from under while everyone, excepting the reformers, was asleep. In the beginning, all of their crafty double speak sounded good. Now, we’re all waking up and hopefully it is not too late to reverse the tide.
LikeLike
Unfortunately claiming that this sprang out of nowhere without warning is a rewrite of history.
There was a fairly large group of people trying to sound the alarm for years. Gerald Bracey. Susan Ohanian. Alfie Kohn. Stephen Krashen. That’s just a very few of the top Cassandras who were ignored, laughed at, and generally thought to be crackpot conspiracy theorists as they sounded the alarms a couple of decades ago, predicting that things would end up exactly as they have now.
Some were barred from speaking at national conventions, just like the NEA and AFT are doing now. Some were barred from publishing out of fear they might offend the big money boys. Some were persistent prophets of public education, refusing to relent in their attempts to make known what was happening, while being ridiculed and run out of town by the education establishment.
I first encountered Diane on EDDRA ( Education Disinformation Detection and Reporting Agency) when Gerry Bracey was deflating the reformist balloons every year in the Kappan and she was just starting her turnaround. I’m so sorry that Gerry died before we were done with his wit, his brilliance, and his ability to deflate the reformsters but Diane has proven a worthy successor in many ways.
I still read Susan Ohanian regularly and her website is a living history of the reformist movement and how it began.
LikeLike
The attack on unions (not just teacher unions but all unions) is the classic “divide and conquer” strategy.
You know the propaganda campaign has been successful when even teachers start blaming themselves and their unions and other professional organizations for the demolition of their profession.
When the self-blame is genuine, that is.
I think one has to be careful in simply assuming comments like those of “Mr. Worley” are genuine. As others have pointed out above, his complaints about the teacher’s union actually rings a bit hollow coming from someone in NC.
While that certainly does not mean that “Mr. Worley” is being untruthful or insincere, it is cause for pause.
“Concern trolling” is very real and, unfortunately, all too often a tactic used by propagandists (eg, as part of well coordinated, targeted letter writing campaigns) .
LikeLike
“concern trolling”
thanks for your post …. I had to look it up
“In the 2006 election, an aide to Congressman Charlie Bass (R-NH) was caught concern trolling the opposition on local blogs. While pretending to support Bass’s opponent, Paul Hodes, the aide argued that Hodes couldn’t win because Bass was an unbeatable candidate. Hodes won the election.”
LikeLike
I entered teaching at 40 as a special education teacher after a wonderful career as an RN. My husband traveled, I needed better hours and already had a Health Ed. Degree. I am now retired and a member of our local,school board. I remember when neither profession, neither Nursing nor education, had a union. There were long hours, low pay and no collective bargaining, no due process and no voice whatsoever.
I viewed myself as a professional and wasn’t sure why we needed a union, thinking as professionals we’d be treated to a place at the table and our voice not just heard but valued. This illusion crashed with the first contract negotiation after I started teaching. Even with a union, which was all new to me, it was contentious and hard to be heard much less treated as a professional. For two decades I felt like a professional most of the time but then it became clear that the tide was changing. Suddenly teachers were overpaid, only worked ten months, were inefficient and mostly ineffective. This was not reality for me or my colleagues during my 21 year tenure.
Now I sit on the board of education and realize my new colleagues view teachers as employees not professionals. From this prospective teachers need unions more than ever as well as tenure. Without those protections corporatization, age discrimination will result in the end of professional public education. The experienced will be let go, not because they are ineffective but because a new hire is cheaper. Experience will not be valued and pensions will disappear.
If there ever was a time to stand united and strong it is now. If we do not charters, vouchers and tax credits will over take all public education.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx “For two decades I felt like a professional most of the time but then it became clear that the tide was changing. Suddenly teachers were overpaid, only worked ten months, were inefficient and mostly ineffective. This was not reality for me or my colleagues during my 21 year tenure.”
I wonder if that turning point started for you (as it did for us) in the mid-90’s? That was when my husband, an engr in electric utility work, & son of a career union man, lost his pension (along w/most in that & related industries). White-collar workers in other once-heavily-regulated industries like ours were being laid off R & L; health benefits had been swiftly eroding for a decade.
But canceling pensions broke a very long tradition. Only then did I begin hearing him & other white-collar workers making bitter remarks about teachers, whom they viewed as living off our [very high] RE taxes while enjoying far superior benefits. The fact that teacher salaries were half theirs seemed not to matter; many had engaged in these travel- & long-hrs-heavy careers solely for the security, which had disappeared.
LikeLike
I left a long comment with links on this page. please read it, so you can see how the top-down takeover of the schools changed everything… go to the links and do not mis this one if you wish to see how long ago what is happening to you now, happened to us in the largest district in the country… the first one that they tested the process for ending the profession of pedagogy and silencing the voice of the classroom practitioner… so Duncan could provide the new narrative and Gates could create the plan for all teachers everywhere, which he named a core curricula—n which is neither a curricula or a core of learning: GRASSROOTS AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH WAITING FOR SUPERMAN
LikeLike
I can share this experience with you over the decades…. our school boards were always elected locally and the fact that so many of them were being hurt with pensions or health benefits had a toll on the voting. But, also, I believe that there is a determined , aggressive stance that says that the superior (profiteers) must defeat the inferior (teachers, workers, ) and it is a “cult” similar to the beat up on China or Japan or whatever. Part of human nature? but totally developed out of proportion with the competitive , individualistic pursuits… and it has gone wild with plutocracy and oligarchy … Gore Vidal warned that this was coming and we have seen it develop further over the decades and I think you have described it well because I saw my brothers and uncles go through it (and then the RIF or reduction in force due to declining enrollments) . There have always been those statistics about teachers, ministers (or other “care” workers) who scored lower on the tests for entering graduate school such as the Miller Analogies test and I remember that from the 60s but the total disparagement of our profession has greatly increased since that time. I do believe the unrecognized “depression” called the Great Recession added to the prevailing trend as budgets at the state and local levels were maxed out and educational budgets depleted.
But canceling pensions broke a very long tradition. Only then did I begin hearing him & other white-collar workers making bitter remarks about teachers, whom they viewed as living off our [very high] RE taxes while enjoying far superior benefits.
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
LikeLike
All excellent points, Jean.
LikeLike
The author has a valid, but vague point about unions. First, we need to recognize the historical facts that have swayed so many opinions against unions in general, and NEA and AFT in particular. The current wrath against unions began in the 1970’s starting with the auto industry. American cars were of off the assembly line with incredible numbers of defects in finish quality, doors misaligned, bolts and screws loose, etc., etc. yet unions kept protecting the those who didn’t take pride. During the 1980’s public workers caught the eye of television news crews showing various derelict behavior, yet the union would protect instead of booting them further lowering public opinion.
Finally, during the 1990’s as the NEA and AFT began blindly throwing vast amounts of money into political campaigns the seed of the current vitriol against the profession was plated.
IMHO, and that of others I teach with, the NEA and AFT must change the vision and conversation of our profession. First, reduce political donations by 50% to national parties. Two, take that money and run ads showing how vast the program is that identifies weak educators, places them with a master for remedial training, and how it weeds out those that aren’t cut out for the profession, and improves those that can be brought up to standards.
Secondly, promote the great master/innovative teachers across the country and the amazing programs that they create and share with others, I.e. Maker Movement, Genius Hour/Time, Flipped Classrooms, STEM, etc., etc. we need to win back the public trust and perception, not add to the Washington dysfunction. The NEA and AFT must be the bullhorn of that drives the truth, instead of being the cash register for politicians.
LikeLike
Mark,
Valid points about the auto workers and such. Those trade unions controlled certification and, in a “Union Shop”, if they kicked someone out of the Union, they were out of a job.
Sadly, teachers have NEVER controlled certification, nor have they ever had the power to remove certification.
Also, I’m a bit concerned about your vision of promoting “great” teachers. I think this plays right into the hands of the deformers. Almost all teachers are ‘great’ for some kids and not so great for others. We can work to improve the ratio of ‘great/not so’ in our classes, but the “Great Teacher for Everyone” is an unattainable ideal.
I do, however, think that the money the NEA wastes on political contributions. However, it should support a FULL TIME LOBBYIST in EVERY State capital! One that (of course) promotes strengthening public education and supports the autonomy and authority of teachers.
State Capitals are crawling with corporate lobbyists. In my State, Representives (at least) are poorly staffed (many sharing a single ‘analyst’) and they deal with several thousand bills in a session, many way beyond their expertise. As a result, they rely on input from lobbyists.
Unfortunately, in my State, the Heritage Foundation had (I think) two full-time lobbyists (at least one, that I chatted with on the elevator). The Farm Bureau had two. The Chamber of Commerce had one, the Timber Industry had one, AARP had one,. Various organizations had ‘part-time’ representation (usually a lawyer hired by several different entities, not an ideal situation). But, I have no idea who the State NEA-affiliate lobbyist was, or if they even existed. “Full-time” is important, because seeing a face day-after-day develops trust (particularly if the information delivered proves to be accurate and the personality of the messenger is not abrasive). This takes time, of course.
The States now control public education and teacher certification, and yet, in my State, at least, there is no strong voice for teachers in the State legislature. The cost would be cheap ($150k max, but if an effective retired teacher did it, well under $100k).
However, the lobbyist would need direction. He/she (shes, BTW, are often more effective than hes) would need to understand the kernel of agreement among teachers as to what constitutes the strengthening of public schools. Sadly, I”m not sure most teachers have ever contemplated developing that kernel.
Thus, the duty of the NEA, I would propose, is to solicit input from its membership and establish that kernel. Then, get to work promoting it at a level where they (and, therefore, you) could still have some influence.
LikeLike
John, I appreciate your thoughts. From a distance I’m watching what is happening to what once was the two best school districts in Colorado. In both cases Koch/Americans for Prosperity, came in loaded with cash and in an off year election took the over the majority of the board. While union and NEA/AFT money was being sent other places. Now one union was decertified and the other is fighting for its life.
The best way to combat this onslaught is to promote the terrific things going on in the classrooms. Yes, that means putting faces to educational exceptionalism. We all know the vast majority of teachers are true, quality of professionals. But also each of us can point to a few that are amazing and special.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reinforcing your point on ‘great teachers’, albeit on a miniature scale. If you do not have the imagination, you really need the experience I had as a stay-at-home Mom of 3 closely-spaced kids, during elementary years, to see this ‘great’ or ‘master’ teacher idea as a false friend.
You need to see the 3rd-gr ‘wonderful’ teacher whom my eldest adored– she was personable & smart, they related well on a personal level– but she mistreated him horribly– an emotionally shaky but highly intelligent kid brings every cotton-picking piece of writing home filled top to bottom w/red ink including ‘unhappy’ not-smiley-faces. The following yr his shrewd younger sib saw her for the insincere b*** she was & turned off, unable to learn anything from hr.
Meanwhile in 1st gr that middle sib had the teacher others complain about & want to see her fired but she’s long tenured– the elderly gal whom son reports often nods off during class. But she was a crackerjack at teaching & motivating reading– the structure of her classroom & procedures reflected it. In that one yr, middle son transformed from an unmotivated wise-ass to an avid reader.
There was a truly awful 3rd-gr teacher (my assessment) who was smart, mercurial, unstable, played favorites, didn’t like boys much. My prayer was granted, none of my kids got her. Yet I heard daily testimony on the playground from moms whose kids had been turned around, motivated, & headed toward high achievement after that year.
There were 1 or 2 teachers out of the 12 serving my kids during their 9 yrs at that school who clearly were all things to all kids, succeeding with everyone they encountered. Of the other 10 or 11, there wasn’t one who couldn’t reach 30% or more of the kids they taught.
Turning that one or two person(s) into ‘master teachers’– scaling it up so they reach many children– that’s a fantasy. They had their individual career paths; one, a young ‘natural’, would become in principal within a decade or less, the other, long-tenured, would retire. I’ll place my bets on mentoring & guiding the profession from within, working to bring the other 10 or 11 up to par & eventually to excellence, giving them the support they need to stay in the profession until they reach that point.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I lived in Mich in the ’70’s; typical talk was not of lazy, incompetent union workers, but of short-sighted corp heads dragging feet on re-tooling for smaller cars despite obvious buyer interest, caught w/pants down in the ’74 oil embargo.
Anti-union folks seem to cite most often the steelworkers strike of ’59 as the ‘over-reach’ that resulted in the decline of US mfg. But when you look at the strike itself, the sticking point was a contract clause that made it difficult/impossible for mgt to lay workers off due to tech innovations [automation]. A tough & crucial issue. That they couldn’t work it out illustrates the adversarial wkr-mgt relationship in the US. Meanwhile Jap & Kor steel had to be imported during their 4mos of wrangling– & it was cheaper–
LikeLike
Problem #1: “yet unions kept protecting the those who didn’t take pride.”
Please cite credible sources that those defects were in fact even a minute problem of the auto industry at the time. The main problem was a complete top down, ignore the worker management and management that ignored the public clamoring for vehicles other than the behemoths that “Detroit” was producing.
Problem #2: “. . . caught the eye of television news crews . . . ”
And that “eye of the television news crews captures perhaps 1/1,000,000 of life and living so that that minute percent of reality is decreed (by the media themselves) to be “real reality”. And it is not.
Problem #3: “. . . the NEA and AFT began blindly throwing vast amounts of money into political campaigns. . . ”
Again please cite sources that would bolster your claim.
As it is, all your examples are opinion, and everyone has opinions just like. . . , but that doesn’t make them true and/or accurate.
You speak with the edudeformers’ forked tongue in promoting the “master” teacher meme.
Hell, I’m a master upholsterer, a master teacher and a master fisherman, Big Effin Deal! Who cares?!
LikeLike
You asked for factual evidence, here you go:
Problem one- Read the essay-based memoir “Rivethead” by Bob Hamper. If possible, find the audio recording from a lecture at a Michigan university.
Problem #2:
Numerous TV stations followed city/county workers. KUSA in Denver caught one sand truck driver, drinking and then urinating on the street. He was brought up by the city to be fired, but the union protested and he kept his job. Fellow union workers wanted him out. Now obviously the vast majority of union workers do their jobs well, but it only takes one bad apple…..
Problem #3:
In 2010, the NEA spent $143 million (hot air.com among many others if you desire to dig) at the national level thru third party means advertising for or against certain candidates. That’s just a single example, but the NEA has been doing this for decades. Expand upon that spending and how the vast majority of Americans complain about the onslaught of television and radio ads since 1980 and at some point you’ll have heard the NEA putting out their position.
If you’ll notice, in the end of my original post I came up with a plan to place the teaching profession back on a pedestal of respect. I challenge you to come up with one.
LikeLike
I am not interested in “a plan to place the teaching profession back on a pedestal of respect.” It needs no “pedestal of respect”, just plain respect. Those who disrespect teachers and the teaching profession care not a hoot about the teaching and learning process, only about themselves and how they can benefit (almost always financially) from that disrespect.
My request “cite credible sources” is met with one anecdotal personal history from what appears to by a quite disgruntled human at the time he wrote his essays. Again that is anecdotal and not a “credible source”.
And citing another TV story. . . . See #2 again. Ay, ay, ay!!
Neither is telling me to look thing ups on a site (hotair.com-one quoting the quitter Palin on impeaching the Obomber and having it’s Sunday morning gospel reading) that I wouldn’t necessarily consider “credible”. Cite the exact source, you know the URL of the article you want me to read. You’re the one that brought it up, it’s your responsibility to supply the needed information so that others may read and, perhaps, even learn something (which may not be what you would like them to learn).
LikeLike
I am really getting incredibly sick and tired of people blaming unions for the problems with the auto industry. The German auto industry is unionized and highly successful, the Japanese auto industry is also unionized and doing quite well. This is all part of the anti union script that is repeated over and over and over and over. Paul Krugman would call it a zombie myth. Oh yeah, unions are to blame, and those lazy thuggish union auto workers are all to blame for the downfall of the auto industry. The CEOs and upper management are blameless angels. The union thugs forced them to fail. The magic of deunionization will cure all ills in the USA, don’t you know. Getting rid of unions will make America great again, rah, rah, rah, USA, USA. Did I hit all the anti union talking points? No, not by a long shot, there are many more rabid anti-union talking points.
LikeLike
I am tired of it, as well. However the biggest problem with members bashing their own unions stems from the misinformation machine.
It might be interesting to know just how versed members are in the by-laws of each level of organization. Union leaders do not regularly engage in forcing the knowledge of the processes of advocacy onto their members perhaps because they do not want to turn people off with bureaucracy. However, those who bash their own unions are often uninformed about how things really work. It is so easy to cherry-pick problems without knowing just what unions can and cannot do by law.
As a representative who wants so much to bring as much information to members as possible, it is frustrating to not be able to connect with members because they get their information about unions from the media. Too many have made up their minds that unions, as a concept, are bad. I shudder at the thought of a world without them.
LikeLike
NYCeducator (Michael) posted “Union Busters then and now” about 6 months ago and I saved his reference page.
http://nyceducator.com/2010/09/ivy-league-union-busters-then-and-now.html
My nephew testified against BP in Parliament in London before the Gulf spiil ; he was “blackballed” and had to go to several foreign countries to get work. These tactics are being used against teachers and perhaps we were unprepared for it? When I entered teaching the older women told us how they were not allowed to work if they were married. Through the decades there have been consistent forces working against people. I keep apologizing to my younger friends that we didn’t get an ERA passed in the 60s ;
LikeLike
Yes, management in the auto industry shares equal blame. But, I stand by my thesis n this subject. The key is, what is the game plan to restoring public confidence? The same old doesn’t work! The Koch Brothers are taking over school boards, the only way to stop them is to get ahead and neutralize their game plan.
LikeLike
Mark, the California Teachers Association recently ran a TV and radio ad campaign called “Ask a Teacher”. It portrayed smart-looking and attractive teachers and its thrust was, THESE people, not politicians or ed reformers, are the real experts on education. I thought it was a propaganda step in the right direction –helping disrupt the narrative that teachers are losers and mediocrities.
LikeLike
I have to agree with the writer. In my 19 years as a teacher in AZ, I found the unions to be reactive, not active. It’s difficult to take a stand from a position of weakness, no matter how strong your argument may be.
LikeLike
Ponderosa, that is exactly what I meant in my post about “taking responsibility.” Instead of letting other people (e.g. ed reformers, politicians, etc.) define our public image – for example, only giving media attention to the bad apples in the barrel – it’s time to be pro-active and start defining our own public image. I have worked in two states and a number of different school systems, and there is this odd tendency in education to “play down” the achievements of our best and our brightest. We need to promote and support the colleagues who are doing an awesome job. And we need to circle the wagons around the ones who aren’t and tell them to knock it off. I for one, am tired of hearing about the teacher on the six o’clock news who got arrested for inappropriate contact with students, doing drugs in their car in the parking lot (last night’s news), etc. Conversely, we only hear good news once in a blue moon – like the teachers who won teacher of the year. We have so many local heroes who do a terrific job. We need to find ways to communicate that – and often.
LikeLike
The first Model T cars were standardized and many workers left the industry because they were no longer able to build the complete car “holistically”, their craft was compromised, this is akin to what is happening in education today; but teachers recognize that the child’s brain is not a car, and that they are not builders of machines, or are they? A labor union is just a “labor” union, and they do not care about the product.
The problem with the teachers unions is that they will not just come out and say that, they have no business being involved in State sponsored curriculum, as Randi does, except that they are corrupted by the $.
LikeLike
So, Joseph, do you vote for your union rep? Does that rep make higher level decisions? Do you stay in contact so you know what those decisions are?
Unions only become ‘top-down’ if the membership gives up its responsibility to make the decisions and allows a dominant personality to tell them what they ought to do. This is a failure of teachers, not unions. You have an opportunity to formulate policy within a democratic institution, but most teachers are happy to defer tom the very small minority who will accept responsibility.
Don’t like what you see? Then become a building rep. and do something about it!
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I so agree. Workers must have a collective voice especially when times are tough. Times are tough now, & union leaders have been caving to the pressure on major policy issues. Is the answer to work from within, or abandon the fight?
As for those in non-union states, my guess is that teachers– maybe even charter-school teachers– will organize as they see the professional cadre being reduced to a motley group of de-centralized, powerless, at-will minimum wage workers.
What’s the alternative, the PTA? good luck w/that.
LikeLike
“Don’t like what you see? Then become a building rep. and do something about it!”
Applause…applause.
When we are looking for others to join our rep council, we always hear that people either don’t have the time or don’t want to be ensconced in what is often perceived as a “negative environment.”
I get that people are busy. So am I. I get that people don’t want to hear bad news all the time, too, but unfortunately there is great potential for that rock that they’re living under to be taken from them some day. Then they’ll wonder how it all happened, and curse their union for “letting it.”
Apathy is the enemy, and a divisive attitude among membership will be our ultimate undoing since our division is the will of those who want to see us fail. We need to take the responsibility for our collective selves and take back our schools.
LikeLike
I think you are correct here in citing the worry about “negative ” environment but it reminds me of teachers saying “I am not political”….. they don’t realize perhaps that politics is how the rules get made and how the budgets get divided up???? politics is how the priorities are set and we all need to get involved even if we think of it as “dirty business”…. this seems to come from my neighbors and family as much as teacher friends — not wanting to assume that you have a “political” life because these decisions are being made and you are not part of it? so maybe that is the other side of the coin when someone earlier on the list mentioned “learned helplessness”….. we need a lot of good discussions with our colleagues in this area… I know I get heated about this with some colleagues and then we have to go back to talking about recipes for a while…. but the conversations are essential
When we are looking for others to join our rep council, we always hear that people either don’t have the time or don’t want to be ensconced in what is often perceived as a “negative environment.”
jeanhaverhill@aol.com
LikeLike
So true. There is a difference between educating oneself about politics and playing politics. The mainstream media, anti-union politicians and loud-mouthed anti-union political pundits have convinced many of our members that unions are politically bad and corrupt without them realizing that these organizations are democratic republics. The members themselves are the union. They have the right to question leadership but along with that comes the responsibility to know what’s going on. Does that mean they are politically bad and corrupt themselves? No, yet still some members try to divorce themselves from their unions philosophically because they do not want to be associated with the rhetoric they hear.
LikeLike
Teachers are servile and conditioned to be dependent, otherwise they would organize locally and petition parents and elected officials rather than sit in the warm bath that the union provides and takes their political funding from them, that they could use themselves to influence politicians. Unions no longer matter, elected officials win despite their endorsements, like Bill DeBlasio in NYC.
LikeLike
How people come to their conclusions about unions usually like
every other aspect of life has to do with their experience. As a founding member of an AFT Local 1481, AFL-CIO
I learned how the positive result from
collective bargaining in improving the learning conditions and teaching conditions in public education. I am sorry that
this teacher had no such positive experience.
Marcy Dunne Ballarc
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Agree. My little sis wore 2 hats (union pres & ms asst prncpl) in an under-funded upstate-NY rural school district over the last decade. Her work as a union rep saved many a job & often served to unruffle waters before it came to that.
LikeLike
While I wholeheartedly agree that our union leadership has sold us out, but the part that unions protect bad teachers made me wonder who this writer really is because that’s where he loses credibility.
I do believe that we as teachers have grown complacent and allowed the leaderships to sell us down the drain. We see this here in NYC, especially in union elections where the apathy is so high, in-service teachers aren’t voting allowing retired teachers to carry the votes.
Teachers need to be more outspoken on their own and do more to let the leaderships know how we feel. Last week the NEA delegates were swooning over the fact that a resolution was passed to oust Duncan, yet why wasn’t that done years earlier? They are in love with their new leader who has worked closed with the White House and is a proponent of Common Core and has accepted money from Gates. So there seems to be a great disconnect between those of in the classrooms who are upset and those that are making our policy decisions. The AFT is the same keeping a leader who is not only tied to Duncan, but sits on the Board of many Reformer organizations, supports charters and takes money from Gates. A leader who did not stand up to Cuomo when he stood up for charters over those against co-locations. A leader who makes sure no one else has a voice at the table. As long as teachers remain silent and complacent, it empowers the Reformers.
LikeLike
Yes, there are teachers who should not be in the profession. But it’s more the fault of administrators that they are still in the classroom, not of the unions. I have had administrators who evaluated me once every, oh, seven years, and it was the same with the teachers who weren’t doing their jobs. So there was no justification for firing them, because there were no evaluations! Hardly the fault of unions.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx pculliton: so true. No different from the corporate world, where I also worked for a decade. Mgt wants to do a favor to vp & hire his alcoholic relative– then sit by for 20 yrs while he gradually becomes completely incompetent? Just try to fire him after you let him stay on for 20 yrs. Failure of admin.
LikeLike
William Cozart
I agree with Diane. The real villain is the accountability movement: “Are we getting our money’s worth?” Once the business models start taking over, once students are considered “customers,” once teaching is considered a “career choice” and not a profound vocation, once the teacher’s “job” is “a facilitator” (and not, as Socrates called a teacher, “a midwife of souls,”), then it’s a straight line to high stakes testing (“It’s all in the numbers; they’ll tell the TRUE story!”), public schools as irresistible targets for the infinite greed of the corporate elite, privatization, Charter Schools — you name it. Look up into the sky: you can almost see an enormous Goodyear blimp pulling a banner: “Welcome to the New Oligarchy! Our motto: ‘Only the quantifiable is real!'”
LikeLike
“Only the quantifiable is real!”
Or as KrazyTA would point out “Only the quantifiable is Rheal!”
LikeLike
Señor Swacker: ya has dado en el mero centro del blanco/bullseye!
😏
Yes, I would say that, keeping in mind that only those who inflict Rheeality Distortion Fields on themselves and/or others could possibly believe such nonsense.
Or as Noel Wilson might say: “Standardized testing and the measurement of qualities—priceless!”
But, er, “priceless” meaning lacking a price because it’s worthless, without value or merit.
Would it be ok for me to add that an ounce of Wilson is worth a ton of Bill and Arne and Michelle?
I can’t give a rational explanation, but when thinking of the innumerati leading the High Holy Church of Testolatry and its VAManical rituals the following comes to mind:
Standardized testing, my brain’s not well
Lately my thinking’s just gone to hell
Talkin’ stupid, and making a ruckus
Excuse me, while I put my head up my tochus
[with oh so profuse apologies to Jimi Hendrix, PURPLE HAZE]
😎
LikeLike
Another word to look up and learn-tochus.
Yep, just what I thought by your usage it meant.
And yes, one wonders whether the edudeformers did way too much acid way back when. Probably not. More likely than not they didn’t do enough mind altering substances (other than the socially acceptable alcohol) to realize that their reality is only that “their reality”.
LikeLike
Duane: I have only heard the word and to me it sounds more like “took-us” and maybe that’s why you didn’t recognize it at first?
LikeLike
No, had never seen or heard it before KrazyTA used it in his takeoff of Hendrix. I’ve learned a number of new words from this blog. But, hey, isn’t that what “better education for all” is, including some of us contributors.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Are we in teaching forever doomed to follow mgt fads decades after the fact, learning nothing from their mistakes & changes? During my 10-yr corporate ‘vacation’ from teaching (’74-’84), the same blimp passed by with the same g*d* message?!… In late ’79, the client we worked for instituted an achievement-measurement system which they used to determine how much of our [previously-negotiated] lump-sum portion to pay against our bill (i.e., did we really do that much work). Looked exactly like Danielson’s SLO method!
LikeLike
Two quotes come to mind for me – the first is “We have met the enemy, and he is us” (Walt Kelly, 1970). There are plenty of fingers of blame to point – the ed reformers, the unions, ALEC, the Koch brothers, the charter schools – but the reality is we (collective we – teachers, educators) are in this place and time because of things we did, or didn’t do – and most likely a combination of both. We have all passed by the classroom of the colleague who sat at their computer surfing the net, while their classroom ran amuck, or knew about those that engaged in questionable behavior and practices. Yet, we said nothing because it wasn’t our business – it wasn’t our job, we were afraid, we didn’t have tenure, etc. Yes, every profession has them – but because we have the responsibility of other people’s children for the majority of their waking hours 9-10 months out of the year – the public holds us to a higher standard. I am not necessarily saying that is right or wrong – it just is. The next quote is by Peter Block – “The only way we can mobilize is to first realize that in some way we have created the situation we are in. That is what taking responsibility is all about. Until people realize that they have created the situations they are in, they will suffer from the disease of helplessness and be relegated to complaining and whining about other people.” It’s time to leave off complaining, and build a profession that we can be proud of – one where we support each other, and hold each other accountable to the ideals and values that brought us here to begin with.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Yes & no. The structure of school admin, on-the-ground, does not support peer review-collaboration-improvement. The obvious solution to developing professional quality is mentoring & peer collaboration, yet this is not built into the structure. Teachers are hatched chicks, yet thrown into schools as tho they were already hens & given little or no guidance. Cannot blame the hens [who had to raise their own selves w/nobody’s help] for not reaching out to the chicks.
LikeLike
You’ve got this wrong. All professions have sub-par members, but it is the job of management to fire teachers, not unions. Unions, in every union shop and union profession, are there to protect the due process rights of workers. If you want to blame teachers for the spot we are in, fine with me, but how about focusing on our lack of initiative and our fear of reprisal, in addition to our sometimes co-dependent need to be martyrs for “the children.”
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I recognize that we are not there yet, but we could take some lessons from, e.g., German mfg union-mgt relations– or perhaps more on-point, Finnish ed admin-union relations– on this issue. We need to have a structure where mgt [school admin] works w/teachers [workers] toward the common goal of improving the profession & the product it delivers w/n the schools. We will get nowhere sitting back & pointing fingers at mgt for not firing people whom we teacher-workers knew full well were not contributing to the goal. Likewise, as you point out, there is no support in the present school structure that incentivizes unions to dump their deadwood.
LikeLike
It seems like ‘accountability’ is an act of shifting the blame on teachers and students as the means to evade the responsibility for the failure of administrative policy or harming them with misrepresentation or false advertisement for shameless profiteering. Political vocabulary for disingenuous folks.
LikeLike
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I don’t think it’s so simple.
The American dynamic of mgt[admin] & worker[teacher] is adversarial.
When times were good, teachers could hold out for better salaries, benefits, & all those other working conditions that benefit both teachers & their students. This happened in the ’60’ & ’70’s.
Management, by virtue of being responsible for profits [budget accountability], is always dumb: as we’ve seen in auto & steel industries, they’ll hold out against workers even to the point of destroying their own industry to extract maximum profit from its workers– &, due to the adversarial rel’p, workers, equally dumb [or perhaps seeing the writing of automation on the wall]– will hold out for their jobs.
Govt leadership (or lack thereof) is to blame here: in the 1980’s, many accounting practices were changed so as to force mgt to show profit for the next qtr regardless of the long view. Govt has arguably been the dumbest part of the equation. Their answer to globalization has been simply: we’ll become a banana republic too.
So here we are today in tough times. RE: ed– Govt [DOE], following the lead of pres, continues to blindly look for next qtr profit [which here actually means: to compete globally, we want to reduce ‘overhead’ created by QOL/ ‘public goods’ like transp, infrastructure, postal, ed– add-ons to American labor cost] regardless of what is good for the long view of America ed or its teachers & students.
Fed> state> mgt/ school admin follows suit, demanding accountability” by whatever means they happen to come up with [e.g NCLB, RTTT, Common Core, lifting caps on charters, etc!].
Right here is where there’s a disconnect. Workers in the ’60’s-’70’s would take note of high profits [the 1%? the Dow? Tax cuts for the big guys?], & demand the $ be spread around. But workers today shrink back, thinking the $ pot has shrunk– hey, look at all the unemployment, the difficulties people I know have getting any job at all– & think they must accept & divide up the dregs. This ignorant attitude is fostered by right-wing media & primary-election politics, underwritten by a laissez-faire govt.
The rubber will meet the road eventually. Right now, mgt seems to think ed is ultimately a labor-free endeavor [just use the internet! homeschool!]. I have a feeling: once the right-wing states have chased all the worker-teachers out of places like NC, Ohio, LA, they’ll come around. & when that time comes, they will most likely be dealing with organized workers who finally understand their worth in the market.
LikeLike
This is a reply to LG, but what I say to him needs to be heard by all of you who have doubts about the union’s role in the war on teachers and tenure which is ongoing now.
LG, I applaud your wonderful questions especially these:”Do you believe that leaders were naively negotiating in good faith and failed to see the harm that the admins’ “anything goes” mentality could do?
Or do you truly believe that the union leaders decided to “screw the membership” by making back room deals?
MY ANSWER:You betcha!
And you should go to per daily (not merely these links) to see how the union complicity plays out in LAUSD. LA’s political scene is a cesspool
Here are some earlier posts that address the union’s complicity
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/lausd-and-utla-collude-to-end-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-teachers-part-2.html
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/has-utla-rank-and-file-been-told-that-im-suing-utla-why-not.html
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/03/lausd-and-utla–connecting-the-dots-of-blattant-corruption.html
LA ain’t Gulianni’s and Bloomberg’s NYC, where the union for the largest school system in America, was headed by Randi, herself, and where the path to undoing the public school system (which relied on discrediting the PROFESSIONAL’S VOICE) began with ending the tenure of the experienced teacher.
Gosh…it is so simple.
When the union made it impossible for the teacher to bring real grievances, when the principal could invent documentation and use allegations to remove the teacher for years before a ‘hearing,’ (which was a sham) the end was nigh, and they knew it. By the time I woke up to the fact that nothing I said or did make a difference, thousands of NYC teachers had bit the dust. I met so many of them, and heard the trauma that came as a result of the utter BETRAYAL BY THE UNION! and yes, many sued… BUT THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO IF THE UNON DID ITS JOB!
Yes, LG. The union head honchos maintained their positions by striking deals that were the death-knell for tenure, while SELLING to the members the wonderful benefits that they secured. Take the latest benefit… this new contract… where teachers -who have not had a contract for years,- have to wait 9 years to see the promised raise in salary… when most of them LEAVE IN 5 YEARS, and many are sent out the door in 3 years, when suddenly their ‘probation’ proves they are not up the job.
LG— You also asked :”Or do you truly believe that the union leaders decided to “screw the membership” by making back room deals? If you believe the latter, who is profiting from these deals, and why haven’t they been held accountable in a court of law?”
YOUR wonderful QUESTIONS ARE ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS… because the ANSWER to them REVEALS THE TRUTH and spells out the corruption.
I watched what happened to many who sued like David Pakter, who won — and lost 10 years and $250,000 to do so. That YOU don’t know about him or the hundreds of teachers who sued DEMONSTRATES THE MEDIA’S ROLE IN THE DUPLICITY.
http://parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7501 and here on http://ednotesonline.blogspot.com/search?q=david+pakter
Google David Palter, who wrote the most eloquent pieces about Joel Klein’s vendetta and the outrageous allegations that took out this celebrated educator. Ask your self, LG, why should this wonderful teacher have to sue to explain that bringing in a plant is NOT grounds for charges of insubordination? WHERE WAS THE UNION?
It is clear that there is not a SHRED OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE BEHAVIOR THAT IS LAWLESS.
I saw Walter Porr, a decorated fireman, who became a teacher after he retired from the NYFD. In his 13th year, face the principal, who in collusion with the superintendent of the district, and the COMPLICIT assistance of the site union rep, decided he should go! They needed to silence his powerful voice and remove his salary from the budget. He spent six years in the rubber room, as the first ridiculous and insulting charge of ‘corporal punishment’ was dismissed and another concocted. (Corporal punishment is a favorite ‘reason,’ and this time was based on the story told by 2 kindergartners, that Mr. Porr had thrown a garbage pail at them. Breaking up a fight, Walter had shoved a pail aside to prevent injury to two ‘combatants’ in the cafeteria, and two weeks later, this coerced testimony condemned him to the rubber room.) Ten YEARS later, after bringing suit in Federal Court, which lasted for years, his appeal has been declined. whom no one knows about, go to through the whole process: hearings that never cleared him including a 3 year battle in Federal court that despite the evidence of complicity of the site union rep, he lost.
Or Dania Hall, in Belmore Long island, a world-class music teacher, who conducted 27 concerts throughout the 6 schools of the district, single-handedly, with no administrative assistance, because no one in the district was knowledgeable about music, had music credentials, or understood the job description Nonetheless, on the day that she was to be granted tenure, Ms. Hall was ruthlessly terminated with a list of fabricated ‘reasons’ used to declare her unsatisfactory; her career and reputation was subsequently destroyed, even as she continued to pay her college loans. She, and all teachers subjected to the lawlessness, take great issue with a national union which claims to work for teachers, but allows a principal to terminate without legitimate reasons or accountability for their actions. Ms. Hall ran the gamut to have her termination reviewed, including: NYS PERB, NYS Dept. of Human Rights and the NYS Education department. However, after waiting over 2 years, her cases were “dismissed! ”
As is always the case when teachers sue school systems, she never had the opportunity to present the plethora of evidence and documentation to support her case, which is docketed at the Federal Level; she was unable to find a courageous lawyer to defend her civil rights, and expose those who violated the law. This is not a profitable career move for any lawyer in this country where powerful people seek to retain their lucrative positions. Attorneys understand that teachers cannot win! Her story at .http://teacheradvocacylongisland.blogspot.com and at
http://endteacherabuse.org/Hall.html
http://nycrubberroomreporter.blogspot.com/2008/12/north-bellmore-ny-teacher-dania-hall.html
and she had to sue just to get her employment records… where was the union?
http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20120522_0000628.ENY.htm/qx
Dania warns: “Remember, new teachers, that since this is your first job, it is just another step in creating a favorable resume for you, and it would be a shame to have that destroyed by unfair and critical performance reviews, denied tenure or termination.”
Or Pi Lian TU! ohmigod, I met her in the rubber room and went to her hearings and I PERSONALLY OBSERVED the union allow the principal to lie through her teeth, but prevented Miss Tu from offering evidence or even speaking in her own defense. My husband was with me and he was speechless.
And there is the stunning example of Lorna Stremcha who sued and WON, but whom the press never covered, even though she appeared in Congress about the lawlessness.
http://www.endteacherabuse.org/Stremcha.html
Lorna Stremcha was terminated from her Montana school in the middle of the school year, and the union actually stated they knew it was ‘a witch hunt’. Lorna has all the documents– every entity from every deposition, transcript, etc. Interestingly the defendants disappeared from the administration building. Even when you win, you lose, because the cost is ruinous. Ms. Stremcha paid an enormous amount of money to attorneys (her savings), but worse, she lost her passion for teaching, as did I and so many other teachers who considered themselves born to teach. How sad is that? I have the expert testimony document from Lorna’s case. Just this one document is a model of ‘how-its- done’… the lies, the deceptions, and the utter humiliation and harassment that makes a dedicated teacher into a pariah. Her book will be published soon.
or Karen Horwitz who also lost, and who runs the NAPTA site http://endteacherabuse.org/
and wrote “White Chalk Crime,” which has the research and facts that I don’t.
http://www.whitechalkcrime.com/karen-horwitz/karen-horwitz-story/
THIS is THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG, LG!
Yes, LG, in NYC the site reps, like the one in Mis Tu’s school, in Walter’s school, and my own, benefited by doing the principal’s dirty work!
My own UFT site rep wrote a letter to the staff of MY school- a school which I helped to put on the map and make famous—, that I had attacked her.! She told students while I was inthe rubber room ( I have their emails) that I ‘ruined the lives of 2 girls.” She wanted a full-time position in art, and because I integrated art into my Communication Arts curriculum, she was considered part time in that license and and vulnerable. She and the principal became pals.
Ivan Tiger was the BIG GUY Manhattan Bureau rep when I had my first meeting to find out why I was in a rubber room, instead of in my practice, continuing my research with the standards for a third year. He allowed the superintendent to publish a letter of my guilt when no charges had been put out, and no hearing! My grievance went no where!
And if you want any evidence of the complicity, how about this… when, at the VERY FIRST meeting since they had pulled me from my classroom, I was shocked at being “found GUILTY of corporal punishment” for alleged verbal statements. — I did not even think at that moment that verbal abuse is NOT corporal punishment, even if I had cursed at the kid in front of an entire class… My attorney pointed that out when I did file a lawsuit.
At that shocking moment, I asked for the EVIDENCE from the investigation that is part of my UNION CONTRACT!
Hold on to your hat… Ivan Tiger sat there in silence, and when it was read that “students A, B, C, D E and F had been interviewed” and that two of this alphabet soup said that I had, indeed spoken thusly,I stood up and asked who were these students, only to be told that this was ‘confidential! Tiger sat mute. This was a comedy, but it was MY life.
IS THIS AMERICA WHERE ONE IS PRESUMED INNOCENT AND HAS THE RIGHT TO SEE EVIDENCE AND CONFRONT ACCUSERS?
The union in the workplace makes that the happen! Period!
To continue with this little episode which the playwright that I am uses to define the issue about union complicity that you question: I asked what exactly was it that they alleged that I said? Incredibly, I was told that “it was not available.”
I stood up in outrage. Mr Tiger, the UFT rep, MY ONLY RECOURSE TOT HE RULE OF LAW, told me to “sit down,’ while the site rep, next to him, smirked.
I left and hired an attorney BUT WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO DO THIS WHEN I WAS THE VICTIM AND I HAD A UNION TO REPRESENT THE LAW?
http://www.speakingasateacher.com/SPEAKING_AS_A_TEACHER/No_Constitutional_Rights-_A_hidden_scandal_of_National_Proportion.html
I was returned to my school but not to my wonderful and celebrated practice…. and there is more…
Randi herself, —realizing the mounting evidence that I had documented — came to my ‘rescue’ when, the new principal, seeing NO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE LAWLESS BEHAVIOR of the district superintendent, published allegations that someone said that “I threatened to kill her.”
This, apparently was too much, even for Randi, who discovered this latest attack, when MY HUSBAND CALLED HER PERSONALLY. She helped me — into arbitration and retirement…. but make no mistake about this, the UFT attorney saw all the evidence that I had about the unions’s complicity in my demise!!!
Yes, sir. The union leaders get elected and maintain their position and the bully pulpit — the same way our legislators do — with promises and lies, as behind the scenes they sell out the teachers.
Read endless stories in The NYC Teacher about ‘principals from hell’ and read how the whole process of hearings undermined the process of due process.
http://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/westchester/2014/02/15/process-of-disciplining-troubled-teachers-faster-cheaper-after-major-state-reforms/5523139/
And where is Marlene Malamay?
Who is she? The scandal that surrounded this very powerful woman at the OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS who did not investigate the claims of teaches, was well known in the city, but it was ‘covered up!’ She just ‘disappeared’ because the scandal would have displayed the observable realty… that the tenured teacher was being railroaded and the union knew what was happening.
I have a question for YOU LG: WHERE ARE THE INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS WHO WILL TELL ABOUT THE WAR ON TEACHERS?
I wish you would speak with Lenny Isenberg who is suing right now.
http://www.perdaily.com/2013/11/lausd-gives-me-a-chance-to-be-a-hero-for-student-teachers-and-families.html
Finally, to address the meaning of your questions:
Did we not see what lack of accountability did at the hedge funds and banks, and how LIBOR folks, described the culture… ‘everyone was doing it.”
Do we not see what the MONEY IS DOING behind the scenes : This quote applies to the culture of deception that is bringing down the INSTITUTION OF EDUCATION, TOO; “These groups, all financed with secret and unlimited money, feed on chaos” pushing us into another crisis. “ Winning an ideological victory is far more important to them than the severe economic effects of a shutdown or, worse, a default, which could shatter the credit markets.”
…or shatter public education and the profession of pedagogy.
LikeLike
This is actually a reply to LG, who appears to be living on a remote island somewhere (I couldn’t find a way to reply directly, as there was no “reply” button visible. Here is what the NEA did for me:
http://endteacherabuse.org/Geery.html That is the fantastically condensed version; the real story can be found in well over 1,500 court documents, state and federal.
To any teacher paying union dues, I say give yourself a raise and bail, asap. Please send a copy of your resignation to Michael Simpson, last I heard living in Washington, D.C. msimpson@nea.org
LikeLike
Sigh. Love you Dan for standing up and speaking truth… I wish that you had become the senator from Utah. You insight and honesty is so rare these days when opinion passes for fact.
LikeLike
Nope. I’m actually living in a state where the NEA affiliate has not done me or my colleagues wrong so far. So many of the complaints I hear appear to be regional issues. I find that there are certain areas in the country where union members are left high and dry. I’m beginning to think that this is a political problem. Tell me, what is the public stance on unions in Idaho?
I feel for you truly. Were you able to send a subpeona to the national association for a printed copy of the policy that they claimed they were following? Was there any input from the ACLU or any similar organization? I certainly hope that I will not be shot on site for asking questions…
LikeLike
LG,
In some regions and states, the teacher unions are being stripped of their ability to stand up for teachers. As teachers are isolated and become victims of Obama’s Machiavellian Common Core agenda, the anger will be intense.
For instance, I’m reading an advanced galley proof of “The Teacher Wars, A History of America’s Most Embattled Profession” by Dana Goldstein—the book has been scheduled by Doubleday for release in September—and I reached page 230 last night.
I learned that the teacher unions are now coming to Charters because Charter teachers are being abused so horribly that they are reaching out to gain union support.
Quotes: “By making their schools particularly difficult—even unpleasant—environments in which to work, some charter school outfits are opening the door for a new generation of educators to seek protection in teachers unions.” In fact, “twelve percent of charter schools are now unionized. … In Chicago, where the teacher wars have been the nastiest in recent years, a quarter of the charters are not represented by the AFT.” page 224.
Even the infamous Michelle Rhee was quoted from her own memoir: “I’d seen too many examples of good teachers who had been railroaded by ineffective administrators. Those teachers had to have a structure through which they could appeal evaluations when appropriate.”
LikeLike
“In some regions and states, the teacher unions are being stripped of their ability to stand up for teachers.”
That certainly would explain the despair that so many feel in these areas. As ALEC legislators continue to advance an anti-public worker agenda throughout the country, it is evident that the political atmosphere of each region plays a role: The more supportive of public sector employees the general public is in a particular area, the more teeth the unions seem to have.
LikeLike
Tenure is a joke and so are the unions.
LikeLike
Susan—it appears you are seeking a great deal of attention here considering the fact that you posted several progressively more disparaging responses aimed toward me after my last post. As I have every intention to respond to your commentary in kind, I do not believe it will matter since it seems you made your mind up long ago to not have an actual discussion on the matter.
It appears your game is now about how insulting and unproductive your comments can get. If you’d like to continue this discussion as a professional, I am more than willing. I somewhat believe that you are addicted to the theatre your posts have created here, so I’m guessing you will not cease with your sarcastic commentary, but you could surprise me.
You are welcome to respond or not, and certainly you are welcome to continue to berate me, if that makes you feel bigger. However, your personal attacks will not go unanswered.
With apologies to other readers for having to put up with all of this ridiculous nonsense—this isn’t a turf-war, Susan. Since you seem to think you are dealing with a troll “who wastes everyone’s time here” and you somehow feel it is your job to stand up to her with your insults—I am a woman, by the way—you should know that I have actually been an active participant on this blog for two years. As well, Diane has posted some of my comments and stories as blog entries. I had not been as prolific a participant from last September to the present since I had been working on an advanced degree and dealing with a hectic school year with demanding responsibilities. However I still lurk from time to time.
I cannot tell you how to utilize your time, but if you feel YOU are wasting your time, that is your prerogative. You might want to refrain from pretending that you are an authority on productive discussion considering your last two posts suggest otherwise.
As in any debate, you are welcome to disagree with the other person, but the manner in which you are engaging me in this discussion does your own credibility, as a professional, no real favors. I have taken pains to be respectful and professional toward you, yet you have chosen the low road several times over. Again, you seek theatre, and so you shall have it.
I seek answers to the questions of how things had gotten so bad in NYC. I feel they are legitimate questions about how this happened to the members without their knowledge rendering them helpless, yet I get ridiculed with sarcasm for asking them because “it’s obvious?” I certainly hope that your remarks do not show how you treat others who seek to learn.
Victims of what went on in NYC have legitimate complaints with their UFT leadership—however what happened to them does not give them the right to bully others who believe in the philosophical tenets of unionism. Take a look at how pro-union commenters get attacked here, day in and day out. No system is perfect, yet those who were wronged cannot even try to find an explanation of how they could have stopped what happened. “Well, duh” is your answer. No one will even think about it—it’s unheard of and anyone who asks is “wasting everyone’s time.”
There is merit in finding out why this happened and what caused the system to break down as it did. My biggest concern with rank and file members is our lack of involvement, whether by our own choice or by the choice of leadership. If the leadership in NYC kept everyone in the dark, why not seek restitution? How is it that the CTU was able to overthrow their leadership and what could members of the UFT have done differently? All of these are obviously after-the-fact questions, but they help paint the picture of how these atrocities can be avoided. Yet…I get ridiculed for asking.
Ah, yes, that. Well since you happen to have a *fondness* for researching links, I invite you to read some of my comments posted here on other education-related issues just to get a real idea of who I am before you decide to assign any more adjectives of contempt to me. You refer to me as “arrogant,” “ignorant,” guilty of thinking “I’m the smartest person in the room,” and “argumentative.” I think I got all that.
If you would like to understand arrogance, look up *sarcasm* then feel free to read your own comments at which point you can do the math yourself, if you like.
If you’d like to discuss ignorance, perhaps you can refer to the dozens of links to isolated, one-sided stories of people from the same websites who felt they were mistreated by their local associations without any mention of the countless other stories of how many local associations go to bat every day for their members. Those who engage in true research get both sides of the story. How can you refute the good that unions have done?
YES. Ok. We get it. You and many others feel like you were sold out. Not everyone feels this way about their association because not everyone went through what you feel you did. That is not meant to devalue what went on in NYC. Never. It has NEVER meant to come off as flip, arrogant, ignorant, or whatever you want to call it. It is meant to give you a philosophical perch from which to view a bigger picture.
Those who support our unions absolutely deserve to have a voice in the matter. If you seek to destroy these voices, you miss the concept of how detrimental it would be to the working person in this country if we were to dissolve unions. I sincerely hope you do not seek to destroy that voice.
Nothing is perfect, and nobody is downplaying the atrocities that AFT members have endured, but there is no greater ignorance than that of those who berate other people who support their own unions.
I’m not even going to address the remark about the person who thinks she’s “the smartest one in the room. I’ll just refer you to your last three posts on here. (Again, see *sarcasm* from above.) I KNOW that I don’t know everything—hence the dialogue that I am attempting to have with you.
An example of someone who is “argumentative” can be found in the commentary that provides no viable discussion of one’s viewpoint. When asked for a deeper explanation of how a particular situation could have happened, the answer is always the same: “The union is corrupt because I was a victim of education politics and also because the bloggers I’ve listed here say so. Read the links to blog entries…most of which I wrote myself!” Ok, that may be a little over-the-top, but you do have an affinity for theatre. Like I said before…you have made up your mind, and your input into the actual discussion appears to end there. I hope I’m wrong about you, at least since you have the time and energy to make things better. So many of us cannot engage in much advocacy during the school year.
By the way, I did read your links. Yes, probationary teachers have very little protection. That’s the nature of the beast, and we all know this going in. I was in that position, once, and I was glad that the district decided I “wasn’t a good fit” because that district really was not a good fit for me. Something much better was waiting for me elsewhere. The probationary teacher argument and the stories attached to it make no case to prove mistreatment by a union.
Yes, it seems wholly unfair when administrators seem to assign us to positions with which we do not agree thinking that we, as award-winning teachers, should have rights to them. That also happened to me when I was removed from the award-winning program that I built from scratch over the course of six years, but I know that my contract purposely does not give my association power over assignments. Assigning people to positions is the right of the administration, as it should be, regardless of reason. Again, a weak argument for anti-union sentiment.
By the way, you asked where the union was for Pakter. His earliest posts praised Randi Weingarten for her support. I guess you only selectively read that which you link as it suits your arguments.
The accusations of corruption need to be investigated in the AFT and specifically in the LAUSD and the parties that took advantage need to be brought up on charges which Isenberg has posted he is doing. Agreed. Where is the lawsuit in NYC? And before you state again that “members should not have to sue their leaders,” I assert that it is the members’ union, not the leaders.’ If members have to sue to get their power back, they should do so. There is no law that says members cannot sue, at least that I know of.
You might want to be more cautious about what you link up here. In another post, you suggested I read some links from perdaily. I did. I also read other pages on that website. This is one of the pages I found from perdaily:
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/07/when-did-teacher-unions-decide-to-turn-against-collective-bargaining-rights-by-kathleen-carroll-1.html#more
The page whole-heartedly insults the host of this blog. Yikes. While Diane Ravitch invites constructive criticism, it might not be appropriate for you to link blogs with information like this on here without giving her an opportunity to speak to this criticism. After all, perdaily is one of your examples—you have this responsibility since you are celebrating its message.
Now I have tried my best here, but you clearly are hell-bent on bringing down the people you felt have wronged you, personally. I am not one of those people, nor are my local association or state association leaders. In fact, my national association wasn’t even the one that wronged you.
The anti-union philosophy is detrimental to me, to my colleagues, and to the students in my community. “I am not anti-union–I’m anti-leadership. Throw the bums out.” Take the “bums” to court, but don’t knock the need for leadership in a union. Find a way to bring better leadership to the union. My county had a shake-up on its exec board by concerned members. We are looking forward to real progress. Look at CTU. It can be done.
I will forever fight for the rights of workers to collectively bargain, and part of that fight is examining what works and what does not. People forget that a union is its members—I say this over and over because I think it is a point of focus for how to improve these systems. I will be forever vigilant, and I will hold my union accountable for its actions if I do not find favor with them, but make no mistake, I and countless others will continually fight the union-bashing that attempts to keep these systems from functioning for the future.
Despite the remarks you have chosen to make, if you were a member I represented, I would still sit by your side and fight with you when you suffer a contract violation or have been brought up on charges of professional misconduct. Somehow I do not believe you would want me as your rep, but I would seek to help you in any way you needed, nonetheless.
A member deserves support right up until the moment that it is proven that said member has somehow breached the contract. Reps cannot support a member who has legitimately breached the contract, but they certainly can support you if you’ve been wronged. And if you’ve been wronged by your own leaders, you need to find better leaders. A member needs to do his part in that regard, too.
LikeLike
Dear Mr. Worley of North Carolina,
Like Diane Ravitch, I do not believe that the unions took away our voice and that, as a result, we lost our place at the discussion table. That is not how teachers lost their voice nor their control of their profession. On the contrary, much credit for gaining a place and a voice at the table goes to the unions. Just look at their history. Teachers have had to fight long and hard to be seen as professionals.
We teach in a system that undervalues and underpays its educators and all those who work with dependents (children, the sick, the elderly, and the disabled). Furthermore, this system also believes it does not have to listen to such lowly workers. If you want to know what happened to the voice we did manage to claim, look at the example of what happened to health care once the medical profession was taken over by health insurance companies. Doctors’ decisions became largely determined by what made sense for insurance profits. Now bureaucrats in nice cushy offices decide on which treatments get supported and which do not. Once big business overtook the medical profession, it was time to move on to the next green pasture. Education became their focus because it was in a particularly vulnerable position given that the country was struggling with the question of how to deliver quality education to the increasing numbers of children in poverty. Rather than helping to solve the problems, business entrepreneurs discovered ways to exploit the situation and make some money. Just like at the turn of the last century, teachers became public scapegoats. We were told that our schools were failing not because of racism and under-funding but because teachers were not doing their jobs correctly. Children and their parents were also blamed for the situation. Teachers’ unions became targets too. Fighting the victims was easier than fighting economic and social injustice. Thus the way was made for business to take over schooling. People with no credible knowledge of educational theory or practice got to work on the public mindset and the legislative bodies controlling school funding. The charter school movement provides a good example of how education became a way to make money. So also does the virtual schools business. Simply put, leaders in these industries line their pockets with public money while they mismanage education. What public school teacher or principal has ever in her wildest dreams made the kind of money people in these industries make? And do you think teachers in these alternative systems have a voice? That is highly doubtful. They are not protected by unions. If they go along, they get along. If they do not, they are out of a job quicker than you can say “let’s teach for America.”
Another example of big business’s opportunistic maneuvers in “improving” education is the standardized testing movement. Do you think any teacher in any of our inner cities is making as much money off of urban education as the testing companies? If you do, you are sadly mistaken. You are also sadly mistaken if you think the unions are to blame for taking away the power teachers formerly had to create final assessments for their students. No, that happened as a result of the misinformation and faulty policies promulgated by NCLB.
Mr. Worley, public education is under serious siege. And, yes, teachers have lost much of their power. But please make sure you identify correctly how that came to be. Otherwise you waste precious time in coming up with helpful solutions to fix the problems.
LikeLike
Good post. I’m dealing with a few of these issues as well..
LikeLike
quote: “The anti-union philosophy is detrimental to me, to my colleagues, and to the students in my community. “I am not anti-union–I’m anti-leadership. Throw the bums out.”
the anti-union strategies have taken hold in the U.S. across the states and we need, as teachers, to identify with the machinists, the workers who are abused by BP (such as my nephew), the other unions that represent health care workers (mostly women)…. Instead of the in-fighting which is encouraged by the powerful/owners.
M. Fiorello who comments on this blog pointed out to me that during the Bread and Roses strike of workers in the factories in Lawrence MA the college students came out from Boston and took the side of the factory owners. That is divide and conquer when the so called “elite” from the colleges are used to turn against the proletariat. We need to realize we are part of the 47% that Romney and his friends depreciate …. (Romney took state funds away from public schools in MA and the cities and towns had to come up with more funds locally; because of the serious inequities in MA between/among cities and towns he hurt the less affluent students)….
anti-intellectual
anti-union
anti-immigrant
they are similar in dividing the public into factions. One of the largest coalitions in education was the advocacy for the first round of Title I funding when the largest number of supporters came together across factions. It is a determined strategy to use anti-union propaganda in order to set forth the rule of the plutocracy or the oligarchy.
LikeLike
I prefer to reply to the comment by LG, here, instead of as a reply to his outrageous commentary.
LG: You are not a troll. It is obvious you are an honest, intelligent, reasoning human being. BUT, sir, YOU read something personal into my passionate responses to the observable reality –the FACTS– garnered over a decade from genuine sources, as the schools across America failed and were replaced by charter schools, as taxpayer money is used to farther economic inequality through ending the public institution of education.
I love unionISM.
I remember how Al Shanker protected teachers! Sandra Feldman went to my high school. MY husband was a stewart for the CWA, and the union was his turf. I was born in 1941 and my education included real HISTORY before unions. Unions are the only thing between us and the exploiters that today are global corporations with no regard for the workers in this country. Collective Bargaining is fast becoming a thing of the past. And there are union leaders whom we must applaud, as we learned here on this blog, as Lee Saunders, President of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees wrote in a letter to Dr. Michael Lomax, President of the United Negro College Fund that the union is halting all contributions to the fund and requesting that its affiliate locals do the same. President Saunders writes that this is a result of the fund accepting $25 million dollars from Charles and David Koch as well as speaking at their summit meeting in California! WE need union leaders like him!
YOU couldn’t be more off-base with your tirade. I am merely telling the truth, as Karen Horwitz did in “White Chalk Crime”… The defenders in the workplace,— of Americans who just happen to be teachers disappeared when the unions turned a blind eye to the breaking of tenure, and the offenders knew it would be too expensive for teachers to sue. Moreover, I and ALL the activists whom I have followed for OVER A DECADE, believe in the need and the power for unions, but we also GRASP the need to take back. our unions! Yes, it is a political issue, because everything today has become politicized.
Truth and beliefs are the subject of my response to your tirade.
I have just finished “How We Know What Isn’t So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life” by Thomas Gilovich.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/125819.How_We_Know_What_Isn_t_So
I RECOMMEND IT TO YOU ! The incomplete and unrepresentative samples from which you draw your conclusions and your beliefs lead you into believing something that just isn’t so. “Treating new information with legitimate skepticism is normal” but it can be taken too far…especially when the destruction is undeniable. “We are justified in allowing our assessments to influence our assessment of new information in direct proportion to how plausible and and well-substantiated they are,” but you ignore evidence that contradicts your dearly held beliefs.
That you are a teacher, too, makes me sad, as it does the many activists for real reform, tireless workers who disseminate the hidden truth about why the schools have failed.
Those who have read your response and your personal condemnation of my telling of the REALITY have some very strong words to express their dismay when you suggest teachers turn to the courts… as if this is POSSIBLE as a SOLUTION. Dania Hall, in Long Island, couldn’t find an attorney that wasn’t connected to the school district or the unions; it took a parent of one of my students— who was a practicing NYC attorney— to find me one, because the dozens that I approached wouldn’t take my case because of a conflict of interests, when I realized I was under attack and the union told me to “relax and get paid for doing nothing” the actual quote from the head of the Manhattan UFT ).Even so, it cost me 25k to extradite myself from abject lies, something a simple grievance could have accomplished. I had two kids in college at the time… I could have used that money!
Those who were forced to sue– to enter the court system where they face the cadre of attorneys with limitless funds to delay– are denied justice, which depends on a speedy investigation and the ability to confront accusers, immediately! Lorna Stremcha, for example, lost all she had saved for her daughter’s college education and says here:
http://blog.ebosswatch.com/2013/05/one-womans-legal-fight-against-workplace-bullying/
“Looking at all the boxes stacked in my basement, http://blog.ebosswatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/workplace-bullying-legal-briefs-300×224.jpg
I still wonder how I survived four years of legal wrangling. Many attorneys feel that this part of the law is all a “game”. It wasn’t a game to me. It was a pursuit of justice. Thanks to my family and faith, we survived it all.” Have you even read this link which I posted here? Or her testimony before Congress, or would that contradict your belief that such an experience is LOCAL!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfNxj-O1DiI
You see, if someone of your obvious intelligence, a teacher , is clueless as to the crux of the destruction… the purposeful destruction of due process that took out tens of thousands of experienced, dedicated professionals– then what can one expect of the population that gets all its information from Fox News.
What you EXPECT to see — and your conclusions are consistent with your expectations; the facts presented by all my links, and by the clear evidence of chaos that is apparent by reading what Diane presents here, have no effect on your fallacious conclusions.
Your questions ‘seem’ legitimate but reflect the influence of prior beliefs, and such rhetoric and questioning as you displayed in your ‘response to my presentations of the facts, are in fact a form of verbal bullying. I do not think you grasped whom you were addressing!
You appear to seek out ‘new’ information, because the conclusions contradict your own ‘prior conclusions’ , which are based on incomplete information drawn from your own LIMITED experience where you practice. When facts are inconsistent with your own information you not only “massage the evidence” you attack! Perhaps this is a method that has worked for you in the past!
I deserve better than that, and Bob, Lloyd and the others who have followed by exposes of the carefully planned assault on teachers, know I bring authentic, observable reality. I think they have read my essays at OPED, and gone to my links to examine the truths present.
I know that it is often hard to distinguish between legitimate and genuine skepticism and close-mindedness. However, it is clear that FACTS have no place in the arguments today, as Paul Krugman pointed out. in his recent essay: Inventing a Failure
Facts are a terrible thing to waste, but it is inexcusable to use them to create false narratives like the ‘fact’ that our schools were failing, so they could force feed the reforms to a gullible citizenry by creating the narrative of testing and evaluation.
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/08/subverting-the-national-conversation-a.html
The Secretary of Education himself, preached from his bully pulpit, and the media, fully owned by the creators of the narrative pushed incessantly. That is why YEARS AGO, I wrote ‘Bamboozle Them,” which Deb (here at this blog) recommended that everyone read.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/BAMBOOZLE-THEM-where-tea-by-Susan-Lee-Schwartz-110524-511.html
But, LG, we NOW know about Gates/Broad/Walton/Koch, and the careful execution of the plan to monetarize public education. You cannot be blind to the truth if you are actually reading the feed here at Diane’s incredible site.
Apparently, YOU are very fortunate to live in the district where you live, one among the 15,588 where the destruction is not apparent (yet?) to YOU, at least; ( I wonder how many teachers in your l district have faced the loss of their rights and the loss of their jobs, unknown to YOU?)
How difficult is it for you grasp how this isolation and division deprives you of a clear view of the destruction?
LG, the FACTS ARE CLEAR in EVERY single one of the biggest districts, beginning with the largest NYC, and the second largest LAUSD, and the third, forth, fifth and sixth, sebventh and eighth, (chronicled HERE at this blog by Diane and by the teachers experiencing the assault). There is ONE , and only ONE way that an American can be deprived access to constitutional rights to present evidence of innocence in the workplace… the system of legal representation has been compromised.
To discount the evidence of Betsy Combier (not a teacher by the way…a journalist who chronic as the destruction in NYC)
http://parentadvocates.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=article&articleID=7534or the evidence on the NAPTA site) to name just two of the links that I provided as evidence, demonstrates your disregard for facts that contradict your deeply held perceptions. Her site links to a plethora of evidence!
“People place a premium on being rational and cognitively consistent, and most are reluctant to simply distort or disregard pertinent evidence in order to see WHAT THEY EXPECT to see and believe what they expect to believe.” ( Remember how some very smart folks regarded Newton’s evidence for gravity, or look at the climate-change deniers, today, or those who describe the young refugees at our borders fleeing mayhem at home, into an ‘invasion.’)
“People subtly and carefully ‘massage the evidence to make it consistent with their expectations;” they “ignore evidence that is at variance with their expectations and cognitively transform it to fit their beliefs”….and sometimes — as you have done– they attack.
I do not deserve what you posted. Yes, I am passionate after 20 years, to see the real reason the schools failed be recognized so we can FIX the problem and bring back professionals to the classroom, but that is NOT because of what happened to me, sixteen years ago.
It is because what occurred in NYC and LA, is happening in Chicago, Atlanta, and across America. Teachers, are isolated and separated, and have no capacity to know what is happening to the teacher in the room next door or in the school across the city, let alone to the ones in the schools 3000 miles away. (Do you have any idea how BIG NYC is??? It ain’t just Manhattan. Brooklyn , Queens and the Bronx are HUGE, and you expect teachers to know what is afoot?
To state that your reasoning is erroneous to be kind to you, because of the enormous ignorance your ‘logic’ reveals, and the personal animus of your rant!
LikeLike
And so it continues…
Susan, I think I know what could have happened here although I could be off-base with a part of the explanation. I do know that I was hunted and attacked.
I was having a discussion with Chris from Florida when you inserted your commentary in post after post as if I was having this original discussion with you. Most people say something and then wait for a response before posting again and again, but you did not. You hounded me for a response.
It is plausible that you were conversing with Chris and others behind the scenes. Why else would you have continually submitted unanswered comments in my conversation with Chris? Why else would Daniel Geery appear out of nowhere citing his story from a website that you linked in a previous post? (Then you responded to him immediately to give him the ol’ pat on the back as if you were expecting him to appear on the blog to address me.)
There is no harm in having collegial discussions on one’s own but suddenly you and Daniel (who are connected outside of Diane’s blog) descended on my comments with such coincidental timing. Maybe you conversed with them since you’re so fond of pointing out “what others say” here. Maybe not.
Anyone is free to follow discussions here with or without comment, but why did Geery address me personally to remark that I was “living under a rock?” I hadn’t been talking to him, either. Oh sure, he just happened to be reading this particular thread in this particular blog at that particular time?
You will say that these three connected individuals just happened to converse with me on the blog because I am “so wrong about everything,” but it is not difficult to see the connections here between those who engaged me. Chris and I were discussing. Then you show up and then Daniel.
In the long run, it makes no difference to me if you did or did not speak to others except as a possible explanation as to why you kept posting over and over again in conversations that were not directed to you.
So whether or not I am correct with that part, I do know for a fact that once I did respond to your interjections with Chris, YOU attacked me personally in a series of subsequent postings.
How difficult is it for you to take responsibility for this?
The reality is that you hounded me, and then you verbally insulted me. It appears that you followed me around this thread so you could “teach me a lesson” about “THE truth.” For the life of me, I do not understand how you do not see the arrogance of your actions here.
It’s baffling.
Since we’re dropping names, Lloyd Lofthouse has taken the time to respond to me civilly. To give credit where it is due, Chris from Florida took the time to respond to me civilly as well. However it appears you believe you speak for them and others on here. You do yourself no favors with this tactic.
I am glad to learn that you still believe in unions, but you often represent yourself as anti-union whether you wish to or not. If you do not want to be viewed as such, it might be helpful to know how you might come across especially given your background with unions.
Many of us who post here have varying union experiences from positions that ought to be respected, not ridiculed. I am third generation union and have been a union member from age 17. Throughout my life, I have been a member of three separate associations, and I currently belong to two professional unions. My father–who was born in 1938–fought on the front lines several times over. I remember the hardships and uncertainty we faced as a family while his association walked the picket lines. I remember the ridicule he endured from the general public for being in a union in the 1980s. I remember the political attacks on his association and some of his more aggressive administrators who did everything the contract allowed in order to show how powerful they were in an attempt to disrupt teachers. I remember other admins who respectfully worked with his association and were shunned by their own colleagues for doing so. The region in which I grew up was the setting for the events that inspired the movie, “The Molly Maguires.” I took part in storming my state capital several times over in my career to protest the bad politics that would harm schools, teachers and students–protests facilitated by my state association. I am on the front lines in my association on the local and now county level. I have served my fellow members for two decades. However, I possess no blind trust of unions since unions are people and people are imperfect. I only want to improve them and, in turn, public education.
Despite your opinions to the contrary, I am an avid reader of this blog and try to follow up on each and every link Diane posts here when time permits. It seems that according to you, people are not allowed to comment unless they have expertly researched every last post and link in every last thread. You have no right to assert such a notion here. This is not your living room.
It’s a shame, Susan. You and I could have been allies in the effort to improve the lives of public school teachers and their charges. Instead YOU made this discussion personal by inserting insult after insult into your descriptions of me. YOU hounded me by repeatedly following my every post with your, to use your favorite word, diatribe.
You have a place here just the same as I do, but you will not insult me and then try to turn it over onto me without being held responsible.
The way I see it, you have a few choices here: You can run to your websites and marshall others to help you attack me personally; you can take the high road and apologize for your original insulting comments; or you and I can just ignore each other.
I think you’ve half-heartedly attempted the third option already. The fact that you called me “sir” is indicative of something very significant here:
You actually did not read my post.
I wonder how much more of what I write is ignored by you? Do me a favor and refrain from addressing me from this point forward. Good luck and best wishes in your crusade.
LikeLike
2nd response
You began something that you wished me to read, and which everyone here can read ,too, so I have no choice to respond because it was couched as an accusation. do not suppose you recognize the irony that the admission that you ” COULD BE off-base with a part of the explanation! You do recognize a statement that is an accusation?
You said: Susan, I think I know what could have happened here although I could be off-base with a part of the explanation. I do know that I was hunted and attacked.”
And this is something you know HOW? That is what I meant when I wrote to you about dearly cherished beliefs. What I wrote was hardly a diatribe… it was an eloquent and intelligent assessment of the poop that you shoveled my way in your previous post about me! Golly!
Yes, my tone may be more like that of a crusader, which comes from over a decade of couching my words for other audiences… but if my voice cannot ring out true and clear HERE, THEN where? Lenny is the crusader. ALL voices, are important, even mine.
FYI, I am too busy for hunting, and you have confused me with someone else. I get the Ravitch feed along with feeds from dozens of sites, magazines an newspapers, and all the crucial sites of education bloggers and reporters… because the publisher at Oped News, Rob Kall (feel free to google him) DEMANDS links when a TRUSTED writer at that site posts anything.
YOU say you don’t know me, but my author’s page
http://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
has been linked here for some time, as are links to the site I created when my a career ended so suddenly thanks to the betrayal I described here.
http://www.speakingasateacher.com/SPEAKING_AS_A_TEACHER/The_Insane_War_on_Teachers_and_Democracy.html
I link and post at Oped, about many things, including science and political news, but write mostly about education. Rob notified me that he is awaiting my diary /series Speaking As A Teacher” which keep me busy busy writing, when I am not hunting YOU!
I am also busy, busy busy preparing a blog of that name which I will be posting here at WordPress.
I get the full Ravitch feed along with scores of others, and that means hundreds of emails. Up until last month, you will not even find MY VOICE here, although I have followed Diane for a decade, since I first began communicating with her. I was not worried about missing her most important posts, since she started this blog 2 years ago, because Leonie Haimison (class size matters) whose Yahoo group I also follow in a newsletter form, and Rene Diedrich, as well as Norm Scott post link to her important posts.
So, about the ‘hunting’…. I peruse on my Apple mail, the commentary that follows each essay of hers, which I often link to and post at Oped, as she knows. In 4 weeks I have become familiar with a few of the ‘names’ of those of who post,here, and I do stop to read commentary here, as I do at Oped, to see what people are talking about. Teacher talk is what this site offers along with Diane’s insight — reading Bob and Lloyd and others has really helped me to know what teachers are thinking about the events that are happening so fast.
My tone may have altered in the 16 years since I began to tell the tale, writing to every editor of every paper, and speaking vis a vis with Dan Rather, but I am not alone. All the activists who I mention here at the Ravitch Blog are teachers that I have met in cyber-space, and whom I have followed and communicated with for a decade or more. ALL, bar none, are astonished that the reason the schools failed is UNKNOWN despite the fact that the EVIDENCE THAT they themselves presented is OVERWHELMING
Speaking of overwhelming, all of them are disappointed that it is impossible to bring the truth to the American public. Even when the truth is before one’s eyes, as my truth is here at this special blog, it appears to be unbelievable! In fact, Dan Rather said that to me, sixteen years ago, when suddenly I discovered that I was alone with no one to represent the truth.
I do not mean to flatter you,LG. but Dan’s first response to me, as I told him the incredible events that I described here recently, was “That’s incredible.” He, too, thought it was local thing, but THAT was 16 years ago, and I did not know about the conspiracy to end public education by simply removing the professional experienced veteran practitioner.
It is exactly that kind of INCREDULITY that the billionaires club has built into the system.
By stifling any media coverage of the first assault to end tenure, and by-passing the traumatic stories one finds– for example on Betsy or Karen’s sites– and publishing endless articles about bad, ineffective, & deadwood, perverted teachers instead, the American public who knows little about pedagogy, and believes that anyone can teach is kept ignorant of the greatest Constitutional Scandal in modern times.
http://www.speakingasateacher.com/SPEAKING_AS_A_TEACHER/No_Constitutional_Rights-_A_hidden_scandal_of_National_Proportion.html
Sounds pathetically arrogant and crazy, huh? But any attorney, OR attorney general worth a fig, who investigates the facts will determine EASILY how due process was abrogated and suborned and WHY. The inevitable result is the Institution of Education was looted for its treasure, just as our banks and our savings, our homes and our jobs were stolen.
It is not for you or I to find the guilty parties. It is the job of the courts, a place where you actually expect the lowly worker to find his OWN way? In a world where access buys justice, and money busy access.
I am glad you are not going to participate in this paranoia isn’t working for you and it takes to much of my time!
Hunting you? Hee, hee!
Oddly enough my 16 year old grandson who came here to go kayaking with us, talked with my husband and I about our prior hunting experience in the past. And, in a few weeks, I expect visits from an 8 year old boy who builds legos, and an 11 year old girl who is designing clothes for her care bears, my grandkids… and getting this place ready for them is a busy task that has me hunting through my collections of books and materials for them.
With all due respect SIR, YOU have MY assurance, I will speedily bypass post with the initials that substitute for your name.
For the rest of you, reading this, bye for now and if you want to know why NYC teachers are so passionate about what has been hidden go to this link if you have not yet done so,
https://vimeo.com/4199476
LikeLike