New York Commissioner John King held his first meeting in New York City on the rushed implementation of the Common Core and the tests whose cut score was set so high that only 31% of students across the state passed. Among English learners, only 3% passed. Among students with disabilities, only 5% passed. The pass rates among African American and Hispanic students was 15-18%. In NYC, the passing rates were even lower.
Here is a report sent to me by a parent who attended the forum last night at Medger Evers College on Brooklyn.
“I am a Brooklyn public school parent who went to the forum last night at Medgar Evers College with John King. I wanted him to hear the near-universal concerns of my fellow parents that high-stakes testing has gotten out of control. By the time I showed up at 6PM, the speaker’s list was full. My mistake – but the forums had been announced at the last minute, with no information about how to sign up for speaking. Many of us believed (mistakenly) there would be an open mike. Clearly StudentsFirstNY had different information. Apparently they brought in about fifty parents and charter school teachers at 4:30 – one woman from “our” side, a sympathetic teacher, had happened to get there that early, so she was the only speaker who stood up to criticize the NYSED.
The forum began at around 6:45. After the first speaker had criticized was done, a “Parent Organizer” from StudentsFirstNY whooped up her part of the crowd with a racially inflammatory speech charging that “parents in Park Slope don’t want the kids in BedStudy” to get the same education as their kids. She at least had the honesty to acknowledge that she was a paid employee of StudentsFirstNY. I know of at least one other speaker (an ex-teacher) who did not acknowledge that she is an employee of StudentsFirstNY. However, what’s interesting about the first speaker is that (I was told by one of my fellow parents) she is actually a parent at PS321, one of the best schools in Park Slope, where test prep is de-emphasized as much as possible. It seems that she wants test-prep for everyone else, but not for her kid.
Early on a state assemblyman (I think it was Karim Camara) spoke about John King – he said, and I quote, “John King has an Ivy League education. He could be anywhere in the world. But he chose to be here with us. Isn’t that amazing?” I found that a bizarre comment, since John King should consider himself pretty lucky to be NY State Education Commissioner, with precious few qualifications, and listening to the public seems like it should be a basic part of his job, not a favor he bestows on his fortunate subjects.
But then the array of speakers started – one after another, repeating the same talking points, accompanied by cheers. They spoke in turgid cliches which no one could argue with – “Don’t you believe in the children?” over and over again – fending off some mythical Common Core opponent who is against all standards and expectations, and wants minority children to do poorly in school. The majority of people in the audience sat stunned and helpless at the barrage of nonsense being unleashed from the stage – a burst of rhetoric totally unrelated to real debates about common core implementation and high-stakes testing. It’s hard to argue with someone when a) you don’t even get a chance to speak and b) you are called a racist without them hearing any of your arguments.
I actually felt sorry for whatever percentage of charter school parents there who were unpaid. They are right to be angry at the educational inequalities in our society. Their children are not getting the same education as parents on the Upper East Side or even Park Slope. But it is not primarily because of differences in curriculum, and Common Core is not going to make a big difference in those inequalities. What would make a difference is changing the way resources are allocated – why are our poorest schools cut down to the budgetary bone? But none of those parents seemed cognizant of that.
What I find ironic is that they kept saying they wanted the same education for their kids as their richer counterparts. But parents in Park Slope would never put up with the monotonous test prep John King wants to institute in schools state-wide. Of course John King and Meryl Tisch would never expose their own children to that – both send (or sent) their kids to progressive private schools, where their children are taught to think creatively.
After an hour of so of being told we were racists for daring to question King, many of us retreated to the lobby, where we discussed how the event had been hijacked. I don’t even think John King believed he was hearing from true representatives of parents.
I had the temptation to rush the mike and give a Swiftian speech a la A Modest Proposal: Why (I would ask in mock-outrage) had John King refused to allow tests for Kindergarteners? (Note: he recently abandoned the K-2 bubble testing under immense political pressure) Did he not believe in standards? Did he not want low-income children to succeed? Without tests, how can parents know how they’re doing? Does he not believe in the children?”

We need to organize ourselves, too.
LikeLike
I wish I could be shocked by the actions of so-called Ed reform groups like StudentsFirst(last), DFER, SFER, TFA, League of Education(obfuscation) voters, etc. Unfortunately nothing they do shocks me anymore. They routinely sink to the lowest rung – lies, misinformation, bullying, cheating – to get what they want. Disgusting.
LikeLike
It’s an old, old trick. Politicians in the U.S. have learned this very, very well. Pack the room with supporters. Truck them in. Hell, pay them if you have to do so. GW Bush NEVER spoke to mixed audiences but, always, to groups like cadets at West Point who could be counted on not to challenge his administration’s policies.
We live in the age of the staged spontaneous event. And in the age of the “free speech zone” located somewhere on the moon.
LikeLike
What’s astonishing is that King and the Regents didn’t grok this from the beginning. They’ve learned the lesson now. Pack the room with supporters. Speak only to select audiences. They can count on the press not to question that. After all, they don’t question it when the politicians do it.
LikeLike
The charter school parents and other touts have been doing the same things here in Chicago, at both community meetings and at the monthly meetings of the Chicago Board of Education. Often, the speakers who praise the charter schools read from the same scripts, at times unable to pronounce the words that have been provided to them. The same Us Versus Them rants are also present, as if the charter schools were the only salvation for poor black children in Chicago. The corruption of the charter schools is ignored, and the real public schools are portrayed as hives of violent children, indifferent teachers, and DANGER. As I’ve covered the Board of Education meetings for years, these scripts have almost become humorous, except that at each point they are libeling the city’s real public schools (without ever naming a particular school) in a script that could have been crafted by Davis Guggenheim — a memory from “Waiting for Superman” and “Won’t Back Down.”
The same manipulation of audiences is also present, as we’ve been reporting at substancenews.net. Most recently, as Nell Cotton reported at Substance, the doors open and all the seats are already filled with groups from the charter schools. In Chicago, they wear matching tee shirts — and sometimes scarves.
Always left out are the testimonies of the children lured in, then kicked out of the charter schools, so they can “make their numbers.” Then, based on the number, Rahm Emanuel and his ilk praise the charters, ignoring the legions of children dumped back into the city’s real public schools.
Next week, again, we will have speakers at the monthly meeting of the school board, reporting on how the “Noble Network of Charter Schools” has long manipulated its “college bound” numbers by kicking out at risk kids, and then dumping those not college bound at the finish line.
The truth is very ugly, but the manipulations, whether by Davis Guggenheim or his local groups, continue, from Brooklyn through Chicago all the way to California.
LikeLike
If you are in the room Shout them down next time… time for civil disobedience and discord
LikeLike
+1
LikeLike
I spoke at this hearing. I came with my brother who is a parent of a High School Junior. I support Common Core and I was one of the speakers. I witnessed the despicable behavior by those against Common Core. They heckled and yelled. Grown men cursing at women while they held their babies while testifying. It was disgusting! A woman told me that I didn’t belong because I am not a parent and I had no right to speak. I was called a liar and told I was bused in. I was called conceited because I spoke on how I was a good student in high school but felt my education did not prepare me for college.
I can tell you I took the B44 bus from my job to Medgar Evers. I spoke up because it is not some weird anomaly that children in poorer neighborhoods have lower reading and math scores than children in more affluent neighborhoods. It is not “happenstance” that children in my neighborhood are more likely to drop out than the people from Ms. Ratvich’s neighborhood.
Children in my neighborhood need to be challenged and inspired. Those opposed to Common Core is really just upset that “the great divide” between their children and those in my neighborhood is not that “great” and Common Core State Standards and the testing associated will show you that my child is just as smart, as yours.
LikeLike
Elizabeth, prove to me that Common Core Standards will work. Prove to me that an increase in standardized testing will work. Prove to me that tying high stakes testing to teacher evaluations is effective and a proven solution for edu reform. Prove to me that collecting nearly 400 points of data on kids and their families is a great means of fixing the “broken system.” NYSED hasn’t proven it and you sound like you have all the answers. So, prove it. Why do yo love Common Core so much, because someone told you to love it? Because someone told you it was the cure to all that is wrong in education? Our state is full of non-educators making major educational decisions for millions of kids. Don’t you find it a bit odd that this one forum, of all the ones in the state so far, was full of “supporters”? Doesn’t that reek of a fix?
LikeLike
No one believes that the Common Core is a “cure all.” But, ensuring all students finally (since they surely are not now) are held to the same high standard and are assessed to the same high benchmark will not only reveal that the majority of students are not making the grade, but also pave the way for significant discussion of the resources students require to meet these higher standards, greater investment in public education etc. This is why Ms. Harlee is right, it’s about the resources and low-income students, minority students, English learners, students with disabilities far and away get less. That’s not right, and changing a cut score — as Ms. Ravitch tacitly suggests — to create an illusion of success, or adhering to disjointed and simplistic academic standards do nothing but hurt students and hide problems.
LikeLike
EH,
Please provide evidence that the common core will do anything to imporve the scores of the children in your neighborhood.
Please provide evidence that the test scores of which you speak measure anything at all (other than the wealth and affluence of the family, and the ability to see that world as the test writer sees the world, of course).
Please provide evidence that the CC will inspire anyone.
Please provide reasoning and evidence as to why expensive new standards and testing will prevent drop outs in your neighborhood.
And please, if you had problem with people supposedly insulting you by incorrectly attributing your support for the state standards, don’t straw man those who have questions/concerns about the CC with that last bit of nonsense.
LikeLike
There is also an account of the CC meeting at Medgar Evers College at NYCPublicSchoolParents—
Link: http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/2013/12/common-core-forums-last-night-in-bronx.html
These comments are very hard to believe. First of all, when the approved speakers are dozens of supporters and only one critic—how is this possible unless the meeting was rigged to favor only one side? Second, real people don’t literally repeat the same talking points over and over again. I have sat through many mass gatherings where people of the same sharply defined POVs spoke—and they didn’t just repeat the same things again and again. This sounds very much like a repeat of the recent LAUSD meeting. Third, note that the poster mentions re critics of CC at the meeting: “you are called a racist without them hearing any of your arguments.” This has all the appearance of twisting things around to make the victims seem the perpetrators.
In other words, dozens to one with vicious insults against those represented by the one does not a fair and democratic and civil discussion make.
You owe the viewers of this blog an apology for being so bitterly partisan that you are unwilling to be honest.
Shame on you.
😡
LikeLike
Hi Elizabeth. I’ve been teaching special needs kids in Bed Stuy and Crown Heights for a long time. I see the disparity between their lives and the more affluent every day.
Please don’t blame Diane Ravitch and the rest of us who would have the temerity to question the school reform movement. We actually do have a clue.
There is no doubt in my mind that the combination of the CCSS, test after test after test, and the eventual creation of curricula to go with the CCSS will NOT bridge that divide. If anything, the reliance on computers and other technology related devices as a means of conducting the lessons and testing will widen that divide, as the cost of expenditure and maintenance is very, very high.
That’s just one reason I don’t believe it will work. There are many others which I encourage you to explore on this blog. It seems that you have strong feelings on the matter. You’re voice needs to be heard, just as I would hope you would hear those who’s opinions differ from your own.
LikeLike
EH – How can you seriously cite standards or a certain curriculum as a fix for the divide you mention? Do you not think that poor children deserve the same quality of schools that affluent suburban areas have? Things like relatively new buildings, newer technologies, newer textbooks, arts classes, robotics classes, grass on their campuses…the list goes on and on. Their schools recieve more dollars per student than inner-city schools do, with fewer at-risk kids or kids needing special services. No standards or curriculum is going to address these true issues of disparity! CC is only taking money and time away from the real fixes.
LikeLike
“Clearly StudentsFirstNY had different information.”
Was the information posted anywhere?
Would there be anything wrong with a request by public school parents to determine whether the DOE gave StudentsFirst preferential treatment as far as specific information?
Doesn’t seem unreasonable, given that NYC public school parents just found out that a charter school chain received preferential treatment over public schools by Bloomberg’s admin.
LikeLike
Vote out all state legislators who take money from StudentsFirst also known as RheeFirst.
LikeLike
I’m guessing that wouldn’t leave very many. Most of these groups don’t buy elections so much as they buy candidates – both (or all) candidates in any given election are beholden to the same interests. So even if you vote out one toady, you’ve probably just voted in another. As New York will soon discover if it’s true that Kaya Henderson and Barbara Byrd-Bennett are his top choices to head de Blasio’s education department.
LikeLike
Henderson and Byrd-Bennett? Are you serious?
LikeLike
I can’t decide whether this militates in favor or against my attending the Manhattan one tonight. I am not against the Common Core. I am against the Pearson ELA curriculum Ready-Gen. I am against Pearson dictating what my kids should read, against the advice of her teacher.
(See my blogpost on that topic here:http://eveninaustraliakidlit.blogspot.com/2013/12/who-should-decide-what-book-my-third.html).
I am against high-stakes testing. I am against poorly designed tests.
But why go if I’m not going to be heard? Moreover, some sources say tonight’s forum is 5-7pm; others say 6-8. I don’t want to schlep down there only to miss half of it or have to wait an additional hour. I think I’ll stay home with my kids (one of whom has a fever) and write a letter instead.
LikeLike
I was at the forum too. Not one speaker mentioned the fact that the failure rate on the new CC aligned tests was 70%. How is that closing the achievement gap? Not one word about over crowding, budget cuts, lack of arts, drama or music classes. Not one word about how much money corporations are draining from the classrooms because of CC and the new standardized tests. But the sentiment was that CC was the great equalizer. One parent even went so far to say “a delay in CC is a civil rights violation”. Baffling.
LikeLike
Talking points.
Wonder who gave them out?
LikeLike
I’m guessing the same people who gave out the EXACT SAME signs that everyone held up.
LikeLike
Why didn’t charters put Common Core in first, since they’re all lockstep in favor of it?
They’re supposed to be incubators of innovation, or whatever. Why don’t they test drive these reform schemes before they’re brought to public schools?
I’m not seeing the “innovation” in uniforms and strict discipline and non-union workers, quite frankly. They could serve a truly innovative role and adopt Common Core first.
LikeLike
Agree.
Also, if the CC is so great, are any elite private schools using it? Was it modeled on what they do at, say, Sidwell Friends?
LikeLike
Great point.
LikeLike
(Both Chiara and Ang)
LikeLike
Thursday at six, King will be in Buffalo. Seating is limited so a lottery was used to select the participants. I know several who are planning to speak out against the effects of high stakes testing, and especially how it is negatively affecting our students. There will also be an anti-King rally from five to six. It will be dark, it will be cold, there will be snow. But teachers and parents will show up anyway.
One of my teacher friends was excited to get some of the test results from last year’s assessments. 60% of the students got a certain question incorrect with the majority choosing letter C rather than A. However, there was no clue as to the actual question or the possible answers – only the data. Not even the general topic. How is this supposed to help the kids do better and improve their scores?
If NYS was serious about helping our lower functioning students catch up, then why all the mystery? Another example of the flaws of CCSS.
LikeLike
The current regime(s) use these rules to implement the progress of their agenda:
“Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”
“Never go outside the expertise of your people.”
“Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
“A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”
“A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”
“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”
“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
“The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
“The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
LikeLike
When our side is persistent and organized, we can break the “rent a protest” movement sponsored by the plutocrats. It’s now more than two years (September 2011) since I spotted the “Rent A Protesters” marching on Chicago’s City Hall on behalf of Rahm Emanuel’s Longer School Day. Within three months, by the holidays of 2011, most reporters realized that Rahm had the Rent A Protest movement going on his behalf. The protesters were mostly poor and black people, and their organizers were well paid preachers whose churches received programs financed by the taxpayers. (The most famous among these is the ubiquitous union buster, Father Michael Pfleger of Chicago).
By January 2012, the beginning of the year of the Chicago Teachers Strike of 2012, all of the corporate media in Chicago was on to the scam of the “Rent A Protest.” WGN TV reporters interviewed me here (in this room) while my sons watched, and I outlined the Who, What, When, Where — and Why — of the Rent a Protests. Then, during a snowy night hearing, the TV cameras went up to the Rent A Protesters and asked why they were there. My favorite was a poor guy who said, “Well, this school needs the Longer School Day. What school is this, anyway?…”
Rahm continues buying up as much support as he can, but he is presently afraid of doing public events because he will be protested and challenged just about any time he shows his face in public.
One of the things our side has to do is continually cover these events as news, and publish the stories. Between September 2011 and January 2012, I took more than 1,000 photographs of the Rent A Protests (and their preacher pimps). Little by little, we identified each of them, then tracked back the programs they were getting. Their payoffs were a far cry from the Gospels. Mercenaries exist in every part of the community, but one of their goals is to remain out of sight. Like cockroaches, they scatter when the light is shined on them. So it was with Rahm’s preachers and the “Rent a Protest” scene here in Chicago by early 2012.
As a result, by September 2012, when we struck, Rahm was unable to get anyone with any credibility to join his side against the teachers. On the first day of the strike, Rahm’s Board opened a bunch of schools “for the sake of the children.” By the second day of the strike, most of the “children” who had been tricked into “going to school” had joined our picket lines. The scab schools had more adults in them than children.
Every adult in those schools was paid, and many (the janitors were forced to go to “work” by their union, SEIU Local 73, which sold out the teachers) were ashamed of what they had to do during the Chicago Teachers Strike of 2012. But the key was the parents and the kids. By the third and fourth days of the strike, every picket line was filled not only with striking teachers but with children and parents supporting the strike.
And that process of support building began more than a year before the strike. We exposed the Rent A Protest, neutralized the preacher patronage crowd, and slowly, school by school, built support among the people. Rahm Emanuel may be the foremost servant of the plutocracy in these things. Much more so than King, for sure. With consistent organization we can not only stop this stuff, but turn around the other side. Many of the mercenaries who were backing Rahm in 2011 were with our side (usually quietly) by the end of 2012.
LikeLike
When we went on strike in Buffalo in 2000, the administrators were in charge and the kids were piled into the auditorium. Most parents kept their kids home. The other local unions were supportive, but no kids or parents picketed with us.
I’ve found that the general public feels teachers are overpaid. They also resent our pensions. I’ve heard more than once that the Buffalo teachers shouldn’t get more than the prevailing wage – which might be the minimum wage, since we are talking about poverty riddled Buffalo. Ironically, I have two daughters in the private sector in Buffalo who both earn way more than your average Buffalo teacher (who haven’t had a raise in over ten years). I’m glad your experience was more pleasant.
And, by the way, NYS has the Taylor Law where you lose one days pay for every day you are on strike. My husband is also a Buffalo teacher.. It was an expensive 2 day “vacation”.
LikeLike
One of the provisions of the Taylor Law is that management is bound to negotiate in good faith. Doesn’t seem to carry much clout, though.
You’re right, Ellen. We don’t have the public’s trust. Especially with the media smear campaigns that have been waged the past 2 decades.
LikeLike
At one point in time, Buffalo’s pay was amazingly low. The board promised us a 20% raise, then reneged. Because of the Taylor Law, the courts made them give it to us. It changed my life. We were able to buy a house and pull ourselves back into middle class. The city schools also owed us back money. We settled at cents on a dollar, but I still got $11,000. Who says that unions are worthless?
LikeLike
Glad to hear that, Ellen. Here in NYC we haven’t had much in the way of good faith bargaining with our mayor. I’d imagine that he sees it the other way…but actions speak louder than words.
LikeLike
That was then, this is now. There hasn’t been a contract in over ten years. Our salaries are now up to $20,000 less a year than those in the upper ring suburbs. The board only offers give backs with little to no raise. We keep the old contract because it is a better deal than any new one they offer. (Love that Taylor Law). And horrors! We have a cosmetic rider – it drives the public wild. I get free facials.
On the down side, Buffalo had a Control Board which froze our salary for three years. No step increases. When it was unfrozen, we moved up one step instead of returning to the correct step, as promised. It now takes thirty years to get to the top step. One of the contract issues is correcting this error. The district has set aside the money to cover this contingency, but it is a sticking point in negotiations.
So, all is not good.
LikeLike
Teachers are the villains. Lazy and living for our undeserved (but agreed upon) pensions. Not the bankers, brokers, and politicians who decimated our economy and still operate with impunity. How I would LOVE to freeze the salaries of our politicians and demand give backs. Tie part of the negotiations to full, transparent, publicized investigations of the fraud and conflict of interest that’s rampant in all levels of government, now. We’ll grade their effectiveness through an accountability system in which convictions account for 50% of their scores.
LikeLike
I retired just before the nonsense started. I see what is happening to my teacher friends I left behind. These are top notch teachers who are now counting the days until retirement.
I have a great pension. I have an excellent health care policy with a low yearly charge (and I have the family plan). My early retirement bonus plus sick day buyout was more than enough to buy a car. I have “a little” in my annuity. I would substitute in Buffalo, but I don’t need the money or the aggravation. I am blessed. (My only worry is if NYS has a state convention and changes the retirement rules).
I am one of the ones they hate. I’ve gone through the system and benefited from my hard work over the years. I almost feel guilty. I plan on keeping the money.
LikeLike