When states won millions in Race to the Top funding, they
found themselves required to spend more than they received from the
federal government. One
careful study reported that school districts in New York
had to spend almost $11 million, in exchange for $400,000 from the
federal government.
School districts are spending billions to offer and test the Common Core standards, which have until recently been untested. Now that they were tested in Kentucky and New York, we know that the Common Core tests cause a dramatic score decline.
This, Race to the Top offered $4.35 billion to 11 states and DC but will cost the nation tens of billions that might have been spent to build health clinics or support pre-K or the arts.
As it happens, few of RTTT’s costly mandates
have any evidence to support them. So districts are forced to spend
more at the same time they are getting budgets cut–or in the case
of New York–at the same time that the legislature enacted a tax
cap that prevents them from finding. New revenues unless they get a
popular vote of at least 60%. The result: larger classes, program
cuts, less money for everything schools need in order to satisfy
Washington’s evidence-free mandates.
What is a pig in a poke?
This is the Wikipedia definition: “The English colloquialisms such as
turn out to be a pig in a poke or buy a pig in a poke mean that
something is sold or bought without the buyer knowing its true
nature or value, especially when buying without inspecting the item
beforehand. The phrase can also be applied to accepting an idea or
plan without a full understanding of its basis. Similar expressions
exist in other European languages, most of them referring to the
purchase of a cat in a bag. The advice being given is ‘don’t buy a
pig until you have seen it’. This is enshrined in British
commercial law as ‘caveat emptor’ – Latin for ‘let the buyer
beware’. This remains the guiding principle of commerce in many
countries and, in essence, supports the view that if you buy
something you take responsibility to make sure it is what you
intended to buy. A poke is a sack or bag. It has a French origin as
‘poque’ and, like several other French words, its diminutive is
formed by adding ‘ette’ or ‘et’ – hence ‘pocket’ began life with
the meaning ‘small bag’. Poke is still in use in several
English-speaking countries, notably Scotland and the USA, and
describes just the sort of bag that would be useful for carrying a
piglet to market. A pig that’s in a poke might turn out to be no
pig at all. If a merchant tried to cheat by substituting a lower
value animal, the trick could be uncovered by letting the cat out
of the bag. Many other European languages have a version of this
phrase – most of them translating into English as a warning not to
‘buy a cat in a bag’. The advice has stood the test of time and
people have been repeating it in one form or the other for getting
on for five hundred years, maybe longer.”
wonderful
Indeed, buyer beware is just the right advice. On the other hand, the warning signs about where all of this was headed were everywhere. To me, this is one of those best of times, worst of times moments. We know so much about how to bring about real positive change, but as a nation we are doing just the opposite. Here are some further thoughts about our current age of wisdom and foolishness in education (much of which is certainly covered in deeper detail in Reign of Error): http://www.arthurcamins.com/?p=214
Con job and sale of the century. Thanks to the Dems and Republicans and corporate interests. One of several things we do correctly, that others copy- and well…we just mess it up. Not just mess it up, but just FUBAR. Too bad we’ll be paying for this for generations.
Diane, I referenced this EXACT study during my testimony before the NYS Assembly Education Committee hearings last week at SUNY Old Westbury. I thought I was going out on a limb by citing to it but now I see I’m in awesome company. Thank you for unwittingly supporting my position! p.s. I hope Assemblyman Graf reads your blogs!
The two people who were required to sign onto the Race to the Top (RtT) grant were each state’s governor and chief school officer. Given that implementation of the Common Core is required under RttT and that was an initiative of the National Governor’s Association and the Council for Chief State School Officers, this means that in all likelihood, governors and state superintendents knew full well what they were getting into. It was a pig in a poke to everyone else.
It’s hard to fathom how little money states received compared to how much they will have to spend. $400K to spend $11M in NY? Wow.
It should be remembered at the next election that governors and superintendents intentionally pulled the wool over their constituent’s eyes.
It was even worse for Colorado, which passed SB-191, tying 50% of teachers’ evaluations to student test scores, the most extreme evaluation bill in the country, trying to get Race to the Top money and then the state didn’t even get the money! Now we have this costly bill but no money at all to implement it. Senator Michael Johnston, the author of SB-191 is now the primary author of Amendment 66 which is being voted on this election season. It is a mixed bag that really would get more money to the kids who need it, but if it passes, the bill it’s paired with also contains clauses that mandates districts must faithfully adhere to SB-191. It also creates an “innovation fund” that I fear will only fund “reformy” type projects. So, even teachers like me who support most of what’s in Amendment 66 have serious misgivinings, considering who wrote it and who is contributing to it (both Bloomberg and Gates have dumped big donations into the pro-66 campaign this past week).
What about that famous quote from the former Alaska gov?
Nobody bought anything: it’s more accurate to say that districts were extorted – not that many of them didn’t have so-called reform leadership that was happy to get rolled – by being “offered” money in the aftermath of a severe financial crisis that was causing fiscal problems for states and localities. While many people knew that RttP would cost far more over time than the federal disbursements, they needed cash upfront.
The tying of federal funds to the adoption of the Common Corporate Standards and new teacher evaluation systems designed to purge the profession was a very cynical, Shock Doctrine-esque tactic, indicative of the bad faith so often on display by these people.
Duncan is threatening to withhold California money because the legislature voted to do away with double testing of kids – we’ll do the common core pilot, which gives no reportable scores, instead of the old STAR test, rather than in addition. I say, Go California.
Duncan cannot possibly believe that withholding $3 billion of Title 1 money from schools is what’s right for low income kids. And if he does, well, then I’m even sadder that he doesn’t like to spend time with his family.
Time to LAWYER-UP
Remember this the next time the “education reformers” and their pr flacks talk about best business practices and hard nosed real world fiscal responsibility and such.
I await the almost inevitable comment by someone that NY didn’t actually spend almost $11 million to get $400,000 but “only” 6 or 7 or 8 million dollars. Hence, another example of the owner of this blog being “shrill” and “strident” and “overstating” her case.
😦
The edufrauds and their accountabully underlings will leave no number or stat unmangled in their quest for $tudent $ucce$$. Even when generations to come have to pay the bill for their profligate spending on vanity projects.
$1 billion—and counting—for iPads in LAUSD, anyone?
😦
You got a way with words, KTA, a way with words that I assume the edudeformers would like to see away with your words.
Señor Swacker: When they come after my head I know they will be after yours too.
Too bad they don’t know we Quixotic Questers don’t take kindly to frauds and bullies, Edu- or otherwise. Although sometime we do get carried away with our rhetoric…
One of our fellow Most Impossible Dreamers actually had the unbounded nerve to say: “We must indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately.”
Rheeally!
I hate to admit it has slipped my mind, but whatever happened to that Bennie Franklin fella, and his unrealizable fantasy of thirteen teensy weensy colonies prevailing against the greatest power on earth? Y’know, the sun never set on that invincible empire, but he and that Tommy Paine guy were always going around “shrill” and “strident” and “exaggerating” their case about something or other [independence? freedom? democracy? blahblahblah?]. Next thing you know someone will start getting uppity about a “better education for all” — including the non-strivers and people of inherently low IQ! Seems you can’t satisfy most people 98% of the time…
Well, the next time we meet up at Pink Slip Bar and see Linda and Ang, remind me to curtail Socrates’ hemlock privileges. Seems that dude in the dark corner—the place where all the $tudent $ucce$$or$ squat—has gotten rather edgy lately. What with J King and J Deasy and other folks catching flack, he keeps repeating over and over in a most chilling tone, “I sneak in, put the fix in the system, move on to other prey—but the End of Days is upon us” — and then he mumbles something about Feb. 6 being that day [something happening that day we haven’t been informed about?] and requesting a little sugar packet “to help the hemlock medicine go down.” Socrates, of course, being the person he’s been trying to “procure” [he seems to like that particular word a lot] the hemlock from.
**Truth in EduSatire: Paul Vallas, “I go in, fix the system, I move on to something else.” Link: http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/Paul-Vallas–213999671.html
I only mention this to you because Socrates has been a little testy lately, telling me last time I saw him: “Worthless people live only to eat and drink; people of worth eat and drink only to live.” He was referring to the “fixit guy” in the former category—and you know those old Greek guys don’t use the word “hemlock” casually.
Well, back to livin’ la vida loca, or as Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra said: “In order to attain the impossible, one must attempt the absurd.”
Anyone for an absurd attempt at a “better education for all”?
🙂
Well said! We need a lot more of your sort of Kraziness!
Media had a role in this. They didn’t have to blindly accept the claims that US public schools were all “failing” and we needed immediate, reckless action and anyone who dissented from this crazy rush was “for the status quo”. They didn’t have to allow themselves to be captured and overly impressed by billionaires and celebrities to the point where they didn’t do the most rudimentary analysis of any of the claims.
While it is wonderful that you are actually looking at NEAP scores and questioning some of the pack ‘o lies that were sold to the public, it is a DISGRACE that Rhee and the rest were feted as saviors and heroes, with no questions asked, for more than a decade.
The next time Bill Keller at the NYTimes writes one of his ridiculous op-eds trashing public school teachers, someone should tell him to look his own profession. They failed.
A most fabulous post, Diane. Love your title.
This is why Obama requested that ALL governors attend his “shin ding” at the White House (taxpayers cost) re: education. This was/is all planned.
Thanking you again, Diane.
The key to this is public schools. Not charter schools, not vouchers, but public schools, for the simple reason that MOST children attend public schools.
If we can ask public school parents to look at their local schools and ask themselves if ANY of these reforms have benefitted their children in those schools, parents will reject this. Because the truth is they weren’t sold charter schools and vouchers, they were sold “reform to improve public schools” and for 90% of the people, that means actual, existing public schools.
Has the last decade helped or harmed existing public schools? If the answer is “harmed” (and I think it is) public school parents will reject this.
I swear there is a song “pig in a poke” by Garcia, the dead, old and in the way, someone???
Someone help me out, please.
But then again it may just have been one of those times when I was preparing myself to experience today’s reality or is that surreality or irreality.
Pig in a Pen – Old and in the Way
Thank you very much, Ed!!
That’s the one I was thinking about.
Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.
Unintended consequence! If we are being kind we can accuse the decision makers of latching on to an idea that might have sounded good on paper but had numerous unintended consequences. Their fault was not exploring all options, I.e. Buying a pig in a poke.
The Godfather gathered all family heads into the big room. We were quite anxious as we knew that we were all going to jail soon. The date was closing in that the feds declared all children must be, at the minimum, above average. Parents were apparently ineffective and punishment clearly would make them improve.
The Godfather spoke. “I have good news for all of you” he proclaimed, I have entered and won a contest that will keep you all out of jail” . . . “for the time being” he mumbled. “Not only have you all escaped the long arm of the law, but the contest I won also awards each one of you $100 to help improve your family situations.”
We all sat in stunned silence.
Finally I spoke up, “But Godfather, this sounds too good to be true! Is this for real? Come on, what’s the catch?”
“Why yes Ianucchi, it is for real; it is good and it is true. However there were some minor conditions I had to agree to in order to qualify for this contest.”
“Conditions?” I asked.
The Godfather explained, “Well, according to our agreement, each family must purchase a safe to store your winnings. But don’t worry, I have an uncle in the business – it’s only gonna’ cost you a grand. You also have to buy the new government manual that sets guidelines for proper parenting. If we buy in bulk I can get them from a friend for only 250 apiece. Worth every penny if you ask me. Written by an unmarried and childless expert in the field of parenting; solid core philosophy – most parents have been way too easy – especially on their infants and toddlers. Author claims most of you are enablers – reading to your kids for example, pushing them in strollers, carrying them, dressing them, changing their diapers. Oh yeah – you also have to decide which of your children you love the most. They even set up a way to measure their value to help you decide which of your kids are best and which sons or daughters are the most disappointing. Finally I also had to agree that you would do some jail time if your kids didn’t reach a height of five feet, two inches – by third grade.”
“But Godfather, are you sure you WON this contest?’
The Godfather gathered all family heads into the big room. We were quite anxious as we knew that we were all going to jail soon. The date was closing in that the feds declared all children must be, at the minimum, above average. Parents were apparently ineffective and punishment clearly would make them improve.
The Godfather spoke. “I have good news for all of you” he proclaimed, I have entered and won a contest that will keep you all out of jail” . . . “for the time being” he mumbled. “Not only have you all escaped the long arm of the law, but the contest I won also awards each one of you $100 to help improve your family situations.”
We all sat in stunned silence.
Finally I spoke up, “But Godfather, this sounds too good to be true! Is this for real? Come on, what’s the catch?”
“Why yes Ianucchi, it is for real; it is good and it is true. However there were some minor conditions I had to agree to in order to qualify for this contest.”
“Conditions?” I asked.
The Godfather explained, “Well, according to our agreement, each family must purchase a safe to store your winnings. But don’t worry, I have an uncle in the business – it’s only gonna’ cost you a grand. You also have to buy the new government manual that sets guidelines for proper parenting. If we buy in bulk I can get them from a friend for only 250 apiece. Worth every penny if you ask me. Written by an unmarried and childless expert in the field of parenting; solid core philosophy – most parents have been way too easy – especially on their infants and toddlers. Author claims most of you are enablers – reading to your kids for example, pushing them in strollers, carrying them, dressing them, changing their diapers. Oh yeah – you also have to decide which of your children you love the most. They even set up a way to measure their value to help you decide which of your kids are best and which sons or daughters are the most disappointing. Finally I also had to agree that you would do some jail time if your kids didn’t reach a height of five feet, two inches – by third grade.”
“But Godfather, are you sure you WON this contest?’
OOPS.
I thought you double posted it to highlight the absurdity of it!!
As absurd as this sounds its not too far from what is happening here in NYS.
Remember, this is the same administration that told us we had to pass health care “reform” to know what’s in it.