When the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Louisiana’s voucher program, on grounds that it threatened to undermine court-ordered desegregation, Jindal went on a well-publicized rant against the DOJ, claiming politics. Suddenly, Jindal presented himself as a leader of he civil rights movement, trying to save poor black kids from failing public schools. His op-eds appeared in the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune, and other media. Shocking that the U.S. Department of Justice was upholding court orders intended to protect the roghts of black children!
Jeb Bush rushed to Jindal’s side, claiming that the voucher program was already showing amazing results. So did GOP leaders in Congress, including John Boehner.
Of course, none of this was true.
The courts in Louisiana said the funding for the voucher program was unconstitutional. So many voucher schools taught creationism and lacked qualified teachers that the voucher program made the state an international laughingstock.
The test scores of the students in the voucher schools were appallingly low, but, hey, there’s always next year.
Here Louisiana blogger CenLamar shows how cynical Jindal was.
He writes: here about Jindal’s claims:
“Unfortunately, that’s just not true. None of it. The truth is, from the very beginning, Bobby Jindal and John White worked with a group of highly-paid political consultants to market the voucher program, almost exclusively, to African-Americans. The Louisiana Black Alliance for Educational Opportunities (or LA BAEO) was created, seemingly out of thin air, by a national organization of conservative “school choice” activists, and they spent months touring the state and recruiting African-Americans to participate in the program, with very little understanding of the public schools they were attempting to disparage as “failures.” For example, about a year ago, I got into a Twitter exchange with one of LA BAEO’s principal consultants over remarks he had made about Peabody Magnet High School in my hometown of Alexandria. Peabody may not be an academic powerhouse, but it is a damn good school with an amazing campus and a deep connection with its community. But nonetheless, LA BAEO held town hall meetings in Alexandria in an attempt to convince parents to take their kids out of Peabody and, instead, enroll them in voucher schools. It didn’t seem to matter that the voucher schools in Central Louisiana are, with only a few exceptions, fly-by-night church schools with shoddy facilities, questionable finances, and uncertified teachers.
“See, the real issue– and how Bobby Jindal duped John Boehner– is that, on the whole, Louisiana’s voucher schools are significantly worse than the public schools. Jindal and Boehner both argue that Louisiana’s voucher program provides students with the opportunity to seek a “better education.” In reality, however, Louisiana’s voucher program is comprised, in large part, of unaccountable and completely unregulated schools, many of which rely on thoroughly discounted, ahistorical, and anti-scientific curricula.
“Last year, voucher students scored thirty points less on the LEAP test than their peers in public schools. Notably, while Superintendent White and Governor Jindal love to use test results as a way of gauging the performance of public schools, neither of them were willing to make the same argument against the dramatically worse performance of voucher schools.”
CenLamar sums up Jindal’s voucher program: “We’re not sending 91% of Louisiana’s voucher students to the best and most important voucher schools. This is not about integrating African-American students in traditionally and well-established and high-performing private schools; this is nothing to do with integration and almost everything to do with quietly re-codifying segregation.”

Reblogged this on Crazy Crawfish's Blog and commented:
Lamar White rules. ‘Nuff said.
LikeLike
Just one question:
Is it bald-faced liars or bare-faced liars?
Discuss …
LikeLike
“bald-faced liar” appeared 62 yrs ago in 1943. It was a mishearing of the term “bold-faced”. read below…
Here is an article that talks about the etymology and history of the term “bald faced liar”, “bold faced liar” and “barefaced liar”..
“… He wanted to know if an out-and-out liar is more properly called a bold-faced liar or a bald-faced liar.
The truth is this: both are used, and so is barefaced. Bald-faced is the newest term; its first known print appearance dates back only 62 years, to 1943. Bold-faced is some four centuries older than that, dating to 1591. Although you might guess bald-faced developed out of a mishearing of bold-faced, the meanings of the two adjectives are not synonymous. Bold-faced means “bold in manner or conduct; impudent”; bald-faced has the same meaning as barefaced: “open; unconcealed”; and “having or showing a lack of scruples.”
Barefaced is one year older than bold-faced; its first print appearance dates to 1590. But the original meaning of barefaced was literal: it meant “having the face uncovered,” either “beardless” or “wearing no mask.” Not surprisingly, folks using the word barefaced were open to shifting the adjective into the metaphoric realm: barefaced soon came to describe something “unconcealed or open”; and then something “showing or having a lack of scruples.”…”
Sources: http://www.mtannoyances.com/?p=384
superdave 83 months ago
LikeLike
Are they cheats and chits or are they sheets and shits?
LikeLike
Cheats and shits.
LikeLike
Both!
LikeLike
Although Louisiana’s voucher program is horrible public policy, it probably does not violate the US Constitution or the federal civil rights laws; for this reason,the Justice Dept’s challenge to the voucher program will almost certainly fail. Sadly, Jindal is probably correct when he writes op-eds attacking the DOJ lawsuit. Of course, any claims he makes in those op-eds re the quality of the voucher-supported private schools are, as Diane points out, bogus. However, neither the US Constitution nor the federal civil rights laws prohibit states from providing mediocre publicly-supported schools. (From what I’ve read, there’s no evidence that the voucher program is giving voucher $ to whites while denying it to minorities; that would be unconstitutional and would violate the civil rights laws.)
LikeLike
All Jindal and Company had to do was show that they were not breaking any desegregation laws, of which you may be correct that they are not. Jindal purposefully picked this fight. I believe he willfully withheld the required documentation hoping that the DOJ and therefore Obama would instigate these legal proceedings. The DOJ is only seeking that the desegregation laws are not being violated. That is the purpose of the DOJ. Had they not sued they would not be doing their duty.
Just recently, in another district (St.Helena Parish) where the state seized control of a rural district’s only middle school, Jindal argued that the local district can not add middle school grades to their existing elementary schools because it will affect…wait for it….desegregation! The parents do not want to send their kids to a state run (recovery school district, RSD) school but Jindal and White are denying them the choice they are begging for!!
His faux-rage is an awful bit of acting. Jindal has even spent $500K to run ads throughout the state to drum up more faux-rage among the anti-Obama, anti federal government crowd. In protest of this suit that he could’ve easily avoided. This was not a politically motivaded issue until JINDAL made it so. It actually still isn’t. Jindal is playing us for fools. I’m embarrassed to say, we’ll probably fall for it…again.
LikeLike
I’m no lawyer but it seems to me that the lawsuit is not about vouchers or their legality but about the intrusion on and conflict with the desegregation laws. Not an expert on that either, but it would seem to be a mandate with provisions that cannot be avoided without proper approval. Jindal moved forward with his version of vouchers in spite if all best advice and against legislative procedure. As for evidence as to who is awarded vouchers, you are right there is none because our Superintendent John White will not release that information based on his interpretation of FERPA. I would suppose that forcing the question via this lawsuit will reveal that. A full court hearing wherein parents of those who applied and were refused and those who were rewarded would no doubt reveal even more than presumed. If the public thinks that shenanigans in Orleans public schools prior to Katrina was outrageous time and a hoped for full investigation will reveal far worse. I recently learned from two very disparate sources credible reports that even my own alma matter in Baton Rouge has serious problems. You know the expression “I thought I had seen everything.” Well hold on.
LikeLike
Stir it up, Diane. Stir vigorously! There is a letter from Patrick Dobard of the Recovery District on 2theAdvocate this morning. They tried to have a closed meeting and Noell Hammett busted it. So proud.
The talk about BAEO, when I confronted the president last year at a community meeting about charters and asked him about special needs kids coming to charter schools, he totally poured is own tea with, “Well, charter schools aren’t for everyone”. That’s right. The siphon off the cream and then STILL don’t raise the almighty test scores.
LikeLike
Are these private schools predominately parochial schools or something else?
LikeLike
Emmy, the voucher schools include many sponsored by small evangelical churches in poor communities, with uncertified teachers and a Bible-based curriculum.
LikeLike
Well, aren’t we fortunate that the supreme Court recognized the ngreat strides made in the south over the last 50 years. No more need to worry about southern states trying to re-segregate. Wow.
LikeLike
Do any of you other blog readers from Chicago find it weird that, every so often, The Chicago Tribune runs a very large column on the Editorial Page bemoaning (whining, really) the D.o.J.’s suit?! The Tribune claims that it is keeping parents from having freedom of choice! Oh–I might add–one such column was written by none other than…Jindal himself. But in a Chicago paper?!
LikeLike
Funny how that word “Choice” gets used so conveniently by Jindal and White. Oh the moral outrage they cry out! Anyone wonder why you never hear Jindal or White talk about “Informed Choice”? That’s because they want to make sure there is no real information out there to help parents make informed choices. Is their goal to keep us ignorant? Why else would you allow tax payer dollars to be used to fund such ignorance? Don’t tax payers also have a voice in the “choice” of how their tax dollars are spent? Are we comfortable funding the resegregation of our nation along racial and economic class lines?
LikeLike
The problem is that the Justice Dept. isn’t getting support from Arne Duncan and the DOE. When asked directly about the suit, Duncan pleaded ignorance. “I’m not familiar with that lawsuit,” he told radio host Diane Rhem. “That’s between the Department of Justice and the state of Louisiana.” He then went on to express his disdain for the whole notion of what he called, “forced integration.”
LikeLike
“See, the real issue– and how Bobby Jindal duped John Boehner– is that, on the whole, Louisiana’s voucher schools are significantly worse than the public schools. Jindal and Boehner both argue that Louisiana’s voucher program provides students with the opportunity to seek a “better education.” In reality, however, Louisiana’s voucher program is comprised, in large part, of unaccountable and completely unregulated schools, many of which rely on thoroughly discounted, ahistorical, and anti-scientific curricula.”
This doesn’t matter for conservatives but it matters a lot for “moderate” school reformers.
Reform was sold to the public as “great schools”. We were told public schools were hopeless and it was time to fund alternatives. If the publicly-funded schools aren’t any better than the public schools they replace, reformers won’t be able to sell the “great schools” line for long.
Also, John Boehner probably wasn’t duped. He’s from Ohio. We’ve been replacing struggling public schools with inferior charter schools for more than a decade. Boehner knows exactly what Jindal is doing.
LikeLike
Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, along with his hand picked Superintendent of Education, John White, and Republican leaders across the nation have sold the American people a false bill of goods.
On August 23rd the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a Memorandum in a desegregation case involving Louisiana. Jindal, White and national Republican leaders would have us believe the feds came and stood in the doorways of private and religious voucher schools, blocking entry to poor, minority students.
But this is far from the truth. Superintendent John White drew the ire of DOJ by refusing to provide data on more than 1300 Louisiana students receiving vouchers, after he had already failed to ask for court permission for changes in student assignments in districts under active desegregation Court Orders, something districts under desegregation orders are required to do. Why did White not provide the data to the U.S. Department of Justice, especially when Louisiana voucher laws specifically require the State Department of Education to ensure compliance with Desegregation Orders? Would this data confirm the DOJ’s worst suspicions? Who knows?
DOJ’s Memorandum actually says: “At this time the United States is not asking that this Court enjoin the State from awarding any school vouchers.” Perhaps Jindal and White missed that statement since it was “buried” at the top of the second page. The Memorandum goes on to ask that no future vouchers be awarded “unless and until” Louisiana “obtains authorization from the Federal Courts” and further asks the Court to direct the State of Louisiana to analyze voucher awards to determine their effect on desegregation, which is normal procedure in desegregation lawsuits. DOJ is merely saying, then, that White must follow the law.
Why are the false claims of Jindal, White and other Republican leaders the ultimate hypocrisy?
Because attorneys for Superintendent of Education JohnWhite went to Federal Court on June 13th seeking to block low-income African-American families from exercising parental choice in St. Helena Parish (Louisiana has Parishes instead of Counties), one of the lowest-income districts in the state. White asked the Court to deny choice to those parents who wanted their children out of his “Recovery School District” Middle School. Why? According to White’s filing: “This court should consider St. Helena’s request looking at it from the desegregation mindset.” And then: “If St. Helena is allowed to add additional grades to its elementary school and high school that could possibly create a greater desegregation issue rather than helping to remedy the one at hand.”
Governor Bobby Jindal, Superintendent John White, and Republican leaders are attacking the United States Department of Justice across the country for merely asking that John White be ordered to abide by desegregation orders. The U.S. DOJ is specifically NOT denying choice to any parents. John White, on the other hand, is actually using a desegregation case to deny parents in St. Helena Parish any school choice. This is hypocrisy run amok.
LikeLike