Archives for category: Reign of Error

Patrick Walsh teaches in a public school in Harlem. He reviewed “Reign of Error” here.

I love this review!

He writes:

“As I write, historian Diane Ravitch is simultaneously the most feared and revered figure in American education. To the corporate education reformers, a group Ravitch has come to identify as privatizers of our public schools, she is a colossal and authoritative thorn in the side. Composed of billionaires Bill Gates, Eli Broad, members of the Walton family of Walmart fame, more hedge fund managers than can be named, and the most powerful political figures in the country including Barack Obama, these are people who are very used to getting their way. And get their way they have: For the past 10 years the privatizers have utterly dominated educational discourse, successfully forging untested and radical changes upon the system, using their virtually unlimited wealth to purchase anything and anyone who stood in their way while funding front groups by the dozens to block the way of others.

“But Ravitch is a conscience that can’t be purchased. She is also an apostate. While serving as U.S. assistant secretary of education under George H.W. Bush, Ravitch was a proponent of standardized testing and “accountability,” which constitutes the base of much education reform. But in time Ravitch did something unique in the Brave New World of education: She looked for evidence of success in the various reform policies and found fraud and failure. This led her to a period of radical reconsideration.

“Then Ravitch did something extremely courageous and rare: She publicly admitted she had made errors in judgment. Even more, she concluded that some of the policies she had championed were actually harmful.

“To the privatizers, Ravitch represents the authority and integrity they are quietly and desperately trying to discredit or purge altogether.

“To reformers, Ravitch remains more than a problem. As the reforms themselves grow ever more strident, standardized and, yes, totalitarian in structure, Ravitch embodies the institutional memory that no totalitarian system can abide.

“This is but one of the reasons that Ravitch has become so revered by teachers who bear the brunt of the reforms. Teachers bear witness to what the reforms are doing to their profession and to the students in their charge. For teachers, politically orphaned, Ravitch is a crusader who has done what their politicians, and, sadly, even their unions, have refused to do. She has spoken truth to power to the richest people and the most powerful political figures in the United States who have aligned themselves with the ruthless drive to privatize our schools, the most vital public trust in this nation.”

Please read the rest of the review. It is beautiful.

I will join with teachers, parents, and anyone else who wants to attend on December 11 at 5 pm at P.S. 15 in Brooklyn for a conversation about my recent book Reign of Error. 

No lecture, just discussion. All are welcome.

P.S. 15 is located in Red Hook on Sullivan Street in Brooklyn.

You are invited!

Dienne Anum, a regular commenter on this blog, reviewed “Reign of Error.”

She is a parent of two. As I have often said and written, parents are the sleeping giants. Once they become informed and energized, we are unstoppable in reclaiming our schools and improving education.

Dienne writes:

Reform or Deform?
Diane Ravitch has done it again. Starting where DEATH AND LIFE OF THE GREAT AMERICAN SCHOOL SYSTEM left off, REIGN OF ERROR documents the hoax that is being perpetrated against the American people by corporate privatizers looking to profit off education by convincing Americans that public schools are “failing” and that the only solution is to turn education over to private providers through charter “public” schools, government-paid vouchers for private schools, and/or virtual on-line academies.
But as Diane thoroughly documents, these methods don’t improve education, they only eliminate oversight over public funds. Furthermore – and worse – the privatization of public education is creating a multi-tiered educational system in which those who have the resources are able to choose the best education for their children, while poor children, children with disabilities and those learning English are left behind in schools stripped of resources.
Diane opens her book with a brilliant introduction warning that our schools are at risk, reminiscent of “A Nation at Risk”,, the paper that kicked off the meme of “failing schools” and American students “falling behind” on international measures. But Diane turns this meme on its head. Our schools are indeed at risk – but the threat comes from the very sources which are promoting the failure meme. While there are certainly areas for improvement, American public education itself is in fact doing a fine job of educating America’s future citizens, as it has since the beginning of publically provided schools.
The first three chapters address the who, what, why and how of the corporate reformers and the next several after that refute the “failure” claims of the reformers. Armed with plenty of data, Diane explores the reality behind test scores, international test scores, graduation rates and the so-called “achievement gap”.
She next dives into the real reason for so-called “failing schools” and the so-called “achievement gap”: poverty. She explores the physical, mental and social effects of poverty and how those effects impact academic achievement, as reflected in test scores and other measurements.
The next several chapters explore many of the specifics of reform, from looking at Michelle Rhee and Teach for America to exploring some of the bugaboos of the corporatists and their favorite “solutions” – merit pay, tenure, charters, online schools, the so-called “Parent Trigger”, vouchers and school closures. Diane is really at her best in several of these sections as she explores and exposes the rampant corruption and trampling of our democratic rights and voices found in charter schools, voucher schools and online schools. The sections detailing charter schools and real estate deals alone would make the entire book worthwhile (if, of course, the entire book weren’t already worthwhile, which it most definitely is).
Finally, Diane ends with what really should be a redundant and superfluous section offering her own solutions to the “problem” of public education, supported by data. You might think that simply exposing the true problems of public education would be enough – the solution should be to reverse the problematic “solutions” that have been inflicted so far. If someone is hitting you on over the head with a hammer and you’re having trouble concentrating, the obvious solution would be for that person to stop hitting you, not for you to spend lots of money on new and “innovative” programs to improve your concentration.
But rather than be accused of offering no solutions, Diane, in very patient teacher fashion, lays out the real (and, frankly, obvious, at least to any thinking, caring person) steps we need to take to improve American education. Many of her solutions focus on reducing the biggest obstacle to academic achievement – again, poverty. Pregnant mothers and children need medical and nutritional support. We need to create universal access to high-quality pre-school education. Students of all ages and their families need wraparound services. We need to work to eliminate segregation. She also addresses class sizes, broadening the curriculum, strengthening the teaching profession and the proper use of charters and testing (since we probably can’t get rid of them altogether).
She concludes with a rather hopeful vision that as Americans wake up to the realities of privatization and the loss of democratic control of the Commons, people will more and more begin to stand up and take back their schools. I hope that she is right. There is evidence – from the explosion of education blogs like hers to the Chicago Teachers Union strike last year to the growing Opt Out (of testing) movement – that she may be correct. But at the same time, newspapers and other sources continue to crank out anti-teacher, anti-union and anti-public school propaganda, and the comment sections are very often filled with more of the same, only more vicious. They say that people get the government they deserve. I both hope and fear that may be true.
Disclaimer: I have been an active participant in Diane’s blog for well over a year now, almost from its inception. Although I’ve never met her personally, I feel like Diane is almost a personal friend (which is why I took the liberty of referring to her by first name, which I almost never do in reviews). I don’t know that I learned anything from this book that I haven’t learned in the hundreds of articles that Diane has lovingly and passionately posted over the months, but it is nice to have a well-organized, condensed compendium of all the arguments and the evidence that Diane has presented. I shared this book with a friend who’s been a teacher for 20+ years now who has not been a participant of Diane’s blog and she feels much the same way I do about the book. She commented, “I don’t know whether to be happy that someone gets it, or sad that so many politicians don’t.”

I previously praised Rob Miller for standing up to Oklahoma’s Superintendent of Education Janet Barresi, who was once a speech pathologist but more recently a dentist.

The parents in Miller’s school decided to boycott the state field tests, and apparently Miller did not do enough to discourage them. The state launched a massive investigation to collect every possible piece of evidence to find him guilty, but they came up empty. It turns out that the parents in Jenks Middle School can think for themselves!

Rob clearly can think for himself too.

Here he reviews Reign of Error, and shows that Dr. Barresi (DDS) and Jeb Bush’s shrinking Chiefs for Change do not scare him!

David Greene, master mentor of teachers in Néw York City, reviews “Reign of Error” here.

THROW THE JACOBINS OUT.

After quite a while I just finished reading Diane Ravitch’s Reign of Error. When most people compliment a book, they tend to call it a page-turner. I can’t say that about Diane’s book. For the first 20 chapters, that was impossible. I had to stop, dog-ear, or bookmark page after page of material I hope to use in sharing her wealth of evidence against the privatization movement in public education.

In fact not only can’t I say I couldn’t put it down, I have to say I had to put it down, or be brought to tears of anger or depression. In truth her book is about a Reign of Terror.

The book can be nicknamed, NSLU (No Stone Left Unturned.) In a straightforward, clear, incredibly well-documented manner she dismisses every argument the “reformers” have to offer in support of their plan. Then, she clearly explains several common sense solutions to the problems we all recognize exist, not those made up to play the propaganda game.

Ravitch clearly understands how the “Ministry of Education”, as she calls the Department of Education has become like Orwell’s 1984 Big Brother Ministry of Truth which used the big lie and repetitious slogans (ominously similar to chapters in Mein Kampf): WAR IS PEACE. FREEDOM IS SLAVERY. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.

Our spokespeople for today’s “Ministry of Education” repeatedly state. CHILDREN FIRST. STUDENTS FIRST. WE CAN TURN THINGS AROUND. REPLACE FAILED PUBLIC SCHOOLS WITH CHOICE.

Ravitch, time and time again, simply proves the Ministry of Education wrong, wrong, and wrong, and millions of parents, teachers and children right, right, right about the reality of public schools and privatization.

As a nation, we should be ashamed to let her words go unheard. As a people, we must rise up and be heard by those in power to let democracy rule public education not global dollars.

I just finished reading the review of Reign of Error in Commonweal, a magazine edited by independent lay Catholics, and I am speechless (almost). Written by Jackson Lears, a cultural historian at Rutgers University, the review brilliantly explains the underlying effort to transform public education through “creative disruption” and turn it into a commodity.

Why have our society’s leaders fallen in love with the idea of “creative destruction” or “creative disruption,” he asks.

Like journalists praising war from the safety of their keyboards, economists celebrate the insecurities of entrepreneurship from a comfortable distance. The prototype was the Harvard economist Joseph Schumpeter. In the bucolic solitude of his Connecticut estate, he coined the term “creative destruction” to refer to the role of entrepreneurial innovation in capitalist development: the inevitable mass firings and factory closings that accompanied the adoption of labor-saving technology.

Yes, indeed, it is “creative,” because it is not their jobs that are lost, not their sons and daughters who are suddenly unemployed.

Ah, but forget the job losses and the human devastation. Just focus on the “creative” aspect.

Lears writes:

Everyone wants to be creative, especially our destroyers. Free-market ideologues celebrate the freewheeling entrepreneur and dismiss any concern about the social ravages of unregulated capital. Worried about the catastrophic impact of plant closings? It can’t be helped—protracted joblessness, ruined families, and abandoned communities are the necessary price of progress. Capital must be free to flow where the investment opportunities are; any constraints on it obstruct the creative entrepreneurship that drags us, despite our doubts, into a better future.

“Creative destruction” is often awkwardly allied with techno-determinism—the belief that “technology” is reshaping our society and there is nothing human beings can do about it. Hence the headline in InformationWeek reporting the takeover of the Washington Post by Amazon.com’s CEO, Jeff Bezos: “Creative Destruction of Internet Age: Unstoppable.” Somehow this bleak vision is conveyed in a rhetoric of dizzying personal possibilities. It remains to be seen how creative anyone can be in a world where fundamental changes are engineered by (allegedly) impersonal forces. The entrepreneurial notion of creativity is confined to half a dozen techno-visionaries (such as Bezos and Steve Jobs) and defined in narrowly monetary terms, while the destruction that so often accompanies it is wide, deep, and real. “Creative destruction” is the perfect euphemism for our neo-liberal moment. Schumpeter must be smiling, somewhere.

Having read many reviews of Reign of Error, I must say that this was the one that startled me by its deep understanding of the underlying forces that are destroying the public sector. This review nailed the banner of neoliberalism to the so-called “school reform” movement. Critics of the book like to say that I painted with too broad a brush. They say that some of those pushing the agenda of school closings, mass firings, charters, vouchers, and incessant disruption really do have good intentions.

Jackson Lears sees something else. He sees what I see.

Please read this brilliant review.

Seth Sandronsky is a Sacramento-based writer whose work has appeared in many journals. Here he reviews “Reign of Error.”

He writes:

“With verve, she demystifies the corporate reform language, with its heavy reliance upon shibboleths about test scores (domestic and global), achievement gaps, high school and college graduation rates. Ravitch deconstructs the reformers’ education solutions such as merit pay, teacher seniority and tenure; charter and cyber schools that can bewilder and confuse.

“The K-12 public school reform trend in the US has of course gained steam since the 1970s, the end of a postwar economic model. What many see began with President Ronald Reagan, the upper class attack on labor unions, New Deal and Great Society policies, paved the path for the incremental assault on public education.

“Today we see corporate-funded advocacy groups such as the American Legislative Exchange Council leading the charge in statehouses across the U.S. They are where the education money is for local school districts, Ravitch writes. Federally, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and Race to the Top Fund (part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), call the policy shots.

“My minor quibble with Ravitch is in exposing think tanks such as The Heartland Institute, whose website proclaims its work supports “free-market solutions to social and economic problems” is knee-deep in lobbying states to privatize K-12 public schools. Such a strategy is less “free-market” than the politics of government intervention, hardly the work of competitive entrepreneurs.

“Ravitch’s solutions to what ails K-12 public schools are straightforward. She supports redistributive policies to benefit the poor and working classes.

“What is not to like? Ravitch’s Reign of Error is a must-read for Americans in and out of public schools.”

Kitty Boitnott is a National Board Certified Teacher in Virginia who now coaches teachers and teacher leaders.

She here reviews Reign of Error.

Boitnott summarizes the main arguments of the book and then says:

This is a must-read for any public school educator, for any parent who still cares about public schools and their role in the community, for the administrators who haven’t been so brainwashed that they have forgotten why they went into education in the first place, and many, many more. I cannot recommend this book more highly. If I were writing a review for Amazon (which I may do come to think of it) it would definitely get a five-star rating. For teacher leaders and parents who are concerned about what is happening to their communities because of the demise of the neighborhood school, I urge you to read it as soon as possible and start using the information inside its covers. More importantly, I urge you to get involved in the grassroots movement that has already started in some parts of the country. There are a number of groups around the nation where the push back has begun. Some of these groups have been founded by parents, some by students, and of course, teachers have started some. It isn’t too late, but time is ticking away. We need to start speaking out and organizing now.

She is right. As more parents and teachers become informed about the coordinated campaign to privatize our schools and to destroy the teaching profession, it becomes urgent that we organize and resist. Those who are funding and leading this campaign have wealth and power, but their numbers are few. Leaving aside their paid employees (some of whom send me their personal disgust with their organizations), the number of those pushing the privatization movement are quite small. I have often speculated that they could probably fill a hotel ballroom. But perhaps not.

Those of us who oppose their efforts to destroy our community public schools are in the millions. We can stop them if we organize. They have money, but we have numbers. This is still a democracy.

 

 

Lloyd Lofthouse is a Vietnam veteran who taught school in a barrio ruled by violent street gangs for thirty years. From his blog, which he calls Crazy Normal, I would say that he is disgusted with those who take pot shots at teachers. He just discovered my existence and ordered Reign of Error.

I can’t wait to read his reaction.

 

Susan Ochshorn is an advocate for early childhood education. This is her life, and she is good at it.

In this post, she reviews Reign of Error and assesses its stance on the issues that matter most to her.

Of course, she is delighted that early childhood education is high on my policy agenda. (She needs to talk to Chris Hayes, who said that there is research on both sides, which puzzled me.) She is happy to see that President Obama is making a big push for early childhood education, but fearful that he will push his standardized testing and metrics onto our youngest, most vulnerable children. I agree.

She wishes the book were shorter, so that more people would read it. I wish it were shorter, but I can’t think of what I could leave out!

But otherwise, her conclusion: “Ravitch’s message is urgent, and timely—and it must be heard.”