Archives for category: North Carolina

Yesterday the North Carolina State Board of Education voted to grant additional charters to Baker Mitchell, who has collected over $16 million in last five years to run three charters.

Today, Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch reports that Mitchell’s schools are under federal investigation.

Mitchell is on the board of the John Locke Foundation, a libertarian foundation that advocates for charters and is funded by Art Pope, the multi- millionaire state budget director. Bill Moyers recently featured Pope in a documentary about his role in the far-right takeover of the legislature.

Mitchell also serves on the State Charter Advisory Board.

Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch reports that the State Board of Education in North Carolina approved 26 new charter schools today, with little discussion.

The most controversial decision was this one:

Among those approved today is South Brunswick Charter School, a fourth charter school to be run by Baker A. Mitchell, Jr.

Over the past several months, Brunswick County school district officials have called out Mitchell for profiting heavily off of taxpayer-funded charter schools that offer no new or innovative educational experiences outside of what traditional public schools already offer. Mitchell also serves on the Charter School Advisory Board, which is tasked with reviewing and recommending charter school applications.

In an impact statement, which the State Board ignored, the local superintendent of schools Dr. Edward Pruden said the charter would offer nothing that is not already available in the public schools.

When South Brunswick Charter School opens this fall, the local public school district could lose more than $2.5 million to start, and double that as the school expands, according to Pruden’s impact statement.

Pruden also explained that the funds redirected to South Brunswick Charter School will not result in the provision of the same level of services to those students as his public school system currently provides. Some examples of those services include transportation and disability support services.

“Brunswick County Schools provide services to all who enter, regardless of social and emotional need or cognitive ability. Reduction of funding impacts programs and services to support additional programs such as school nursing, social workers, counseling, and psychological support,” explained the impact statement.

The founder of the new charter school is profiting handsomely from his existing charters:

South Brunswick Charter School will be operated by the Roger Bacon Academy and will rent property from Coastal Conservancy, LLC. Baker A. Mitchell Jr.—who happens to sit on the Charter School Advisory Board—owns both of those entities.

Mitchell, who currently operates three other public charter schools in the state, paid himself nearly $1.8 million in 2012 for what he characterized as “management fees” to the IRS for running Charter Day School. He has reportedly collected in the neighborhood of $16 million over a five-year period in management fees alone, according to Pruden’s impact statement [boldface added by me].

All of that money, of course, is taxpayer funds. But Mitchell doesn’t have to explain how, for example, he used $630,696 of taxpayer dollars for staff development, as reported on his 2012 Form 990.

The chair of the State Board rejected Pruden’s concern about conflict of interest and told him that the problems should be resolved locally, which of course is a big fat joke.

At least the State Treasurer found it in her heart to worry about what these new charters would do to the local public schools, but she voted for the charters anyway:

North Carolina State Treasurer Janet Cowell expressed concern for local school districts as she voted to approve the 26 new charter schools.

“There is a tipping point for LEAs,” cautioned Cowell, explaining that in school districts where there are high concentrations of charter schools, students’ educational experiences in traditional public schools could be compromised as funds are siphoned away from those budgets and into the coffers of charters.

No problem. North Carolina is monetizing its taxpayer dollars and finding ways for clever entrepreneurs to get rich.

 

The governor and legislature in North Carolina are determined to privatize as many public dollars as possible.

They have approved vouchers for religious schools, private schools, and even home schools.

But their main privatization strategy is charter schools.

They are set to expand the number in the state, thus creating a consumer mentality and simultaneously draining funds from the public schools.

A news report says that:

The next two weeks will determine how rapidly North Carolina’s charter-school movement expands, at a time when supporters say the schools are giving families more choices and critics say they’re harming traditional public schools.

On Thursday, the State Board of Education will vote on whether to give final approval to 26 charter schools – four in Wake County, one in Durham, one in Harnett County and 11 in the Charlotte area – that want to open this fall. It would mark the state’s largest single-year expansion of charter schools since the program was in its infancy in the late 1990s.

Next week, the state Office of Charter Schools will recommend which of the 71 charter schools that have applied to open in 2015 should go forward for further review. Those applicants includes eight in Wake County, eight in Durham and 31 in Charlotte and surrounding areas.

North Carolina could have more than 200 charter schools open in 2015 – double the number that existed until a state limit was lifted in 2011. With the help of a sympathetic state legislature, charters are poised to become a larger part of the public-school landscape.

Many of these schools will be run by for-profit managers. Based on past experience, these managers will hire low-wage teachers who are mostly uncertified and will make a tidy fortune.
North Carolina adopted the ALEC model legislation and created a state charter board with the power to override the decisions of local communities. And the legislators can’t do enough to ensure the profitability of charters.

Last year, state legislators approved several changes to help charters, including lowering the number of certified teachers they must have and allowing them to expand by one grade level each year without seeking state approval.

The General Assembly also created the Charter Schools Advisory Board to make recommendations to the State Board of Education on charter school applications and renewals. The new board consists of members who, according to last year’s state law, “shall have demonstrated an understanding of and a commitment to charter schools as a strategy for strengthening public education.”

On Jan. 13, the advisory board will begin the process of reviewing the 2015 charter schools that the Office of Charter Schools has determined to have submitted complete applications. The board could accept the recommendations or opt also to review the applications that were rejected as incomplete.

The advisory board will make its recommendations on new schools to the State Board of Education by the summer.

The charters harm the public schools, taking away money needed for their programs.

Durham school officials say they’re losing more than $14 million a year because of students attending charter schools. Durham students are going to not only the 10 charter schools in the county, but also to schools in other nearby counties.

Heidi Carter, chairwoman of the Durham school board, said charter schools are also making it hard to plan for the future.

“It’s difficult to factor what our space needs will be,” she said. “It’s difficult to accurately predict what the elementary school population will be in the district in the next five years.”

Carter said she worries that there’s no longer a formal process to raise concerns about charters to the State Board.

“I doubt all their passionate pleas will go very far with this state board,” said Terry Stoops, director of education studies at the John Locke Foundation, a conservative think tank that supports charter schools.

Some applicants have ties to well-known political figures in the state. For instance, the chairman of the board of Providence Charter High School in Rockingham County is 6th District congressional candidate Phil Berger Jr., the son of Senate Republican Leader Phil Berger. The school is seeking final approval this week.

Republican political consultant Chris Sinclair would be the vice president of the boards for Capital City Charter High School and Central Wake Charter High School, both proposed for Wake County in 2015. Sinclair said he agreed to be part of both schools because they’re targeted at at-risk teenagers.

The John Locke Foundation and the Civitas Foundation are both associated with Art Pope, the multimillionaire ideologue who is not only state budget director but mastermind of the far-right takeover of the legislature. His money helped to defeat moderate Republicans and guaranteed control by politicians hostile to the public sector.

Francis DeLuca, president of the Civitas Institute, a conservative think tank in Raleigh, has agreed to be on the board of the proposed James Madison Academy, which wants to open in 2015 in Wake County. One of the school’s goals would be to “emphasize building strong moral character.”

“I believe in charter schools, and I want to give parents more choices,” DeLuca said.


When Governor Jim Hunt was in office, he was a national leader on behalf of improving education. He advocated for higher teacher salaries, he advocated for early childhood education, and he took pride in the steady improvement in North Carolina during his tenure.

Now he runs the Hunt Institute, which has been active in teaching governors across the nation about education issues.

I was a member of the board of the Hunt Institute for a few years (I left in 2009), and I was impressed by Governor Hunt’s sincere concern for public education and his gracious style of interacting with others.

Just recently, he wrote an editorial calling on the Legislature to raise the salaries of teachers in North Carolina, as he did in his time, so that they met the national average (NC now ranks 46th in the nation).

That was a good thing to do, but Governor Hunt said nothing about the giant wrecking ball that the far-right Legislature has taken to public education and to the teaching profession. He didn’t mention the Legislature’s rapid expansion of privately managed charters, many of which will have for-profit companies running them; he said nothing about vouchers for religious schools and home-schooling; he said nothing about the Legislature taking away stipends for graduate degrees or about the appropriation of $6 million for Teach for America at the same time that the budget for the NC Teaching Fellows program was cut, or about any of the other bills passed with the intention of humbling teachers.

Please, Governor Hunt, speak up for the teachers. Speak up for the children. Speak up for public education. You are such a respected figure in the state. Your voice can make a difference.

This last year, the legislature and governor in North Carolina enacted legislation affecting the teaching profession in North Carolina.

Scott Imig and Robert Smith at the University of North Carolina in Wilmington decided that it was important to hear how the legislation affected those in the state’s schools:

They wrote:

In the summer of 2013, the North Carolina legislature passed broad educational reforms. Among these were the abolishment of tenure, the end of additional compensation for teachers who earn a graduate degree, removal of class size caps, and implementation of a voucher program. As professors who interact daily with current K-12 educators, we heard numerous anecdotes this fall about declining support for public education, increased teacher attrition, deteriorating morale, and concerns about pursuing advanced degrees. While the anecdotes were fairly consistent, there was not, to our knowledge, available data that captured the immediate and potential long-term effects of the policy changes. 

Imig and Smith surveyed more than 600 educators in the state to get their perspective on the changes. Their report is titled “Listening to Those on the Front Lines.”

Here is what they found.

• Over 96% of the educators who participated think public education in North Carolina is headed in the wrong direction.

• Two-thirds of teachers and administrators indicated that recent legislative changes have negatively impacted the quality of teaching and learning in their own school.

• Over 74% of respondents indicated that, as a result of the legislative changes, they were less likely to continue working as a teacher/administrator in NC.

• 97% of respondents think the legislative changes have had a negative effect on teacher morale.

• 98% of teachers and administrators surveyed believe that the removal of financial incentives for pursuing advanced degrees will have a negative effect on the quality of teaching and learning in North Carolina’s schools.

• Nearly all respondents indicated that the failure to give teachers a raise in pay will have a negative impact on the quality of public education.

• Ninety percent of teachers and administrators indicated that the removal of tenure, with all teachers placed on 1-, 2-, or 4-year contracts by 2018, will have a negative effect on the quality of public education in NC.

• In regard to the legislature’s plan to eliminate tenure and identify the top 25% of teachers for annual pay raises, approximately 7% of teachers indicated they would give up tenure in exchange for the supplement (64% would not give up tenure and 28% are uncertain).

• 38% of respondents believe the Read to Achieve Program will have a positive impact on the quality of education in the state. Among elementary teachers, this figure is just 20%.

• A significant portion of teacher and administrator comments described working harder to protect students from the perceived effects of the recent legislative changes.

• Nearly 87% of respondents think the voucher plan, providing eligible families with a $4,200 annual voucher to allow a child to go to a private school, will have a negative impact on the state’s public schools. 

What are the chances that the governor and the legislature will care what teachers and administrators think about their legislation?

Rob Schofield of NC PolicyWatch wrote this alarming editorial about a disgraceful effort to silence a critic of Governor McCrory.

North Carolina was once the most progressive state in the South, but in the short time that Governor McCrory has been in office, abetted by a reactionary legislature, North Carolina has adopted some of the most anti-education, anti-social, regressive policies in the nation.

Governor McCrory’s state budget director is Art Pope, one of the richest men in the state, who has his own private foundation, called the Pope-Civitas Institute. Art Pope has a libertarian, anti-government, anti-public sector agenda, which he has helped to implement.

The Pope-Civitas Institute has begun a campaign of intimidation directed at Professor Gene Nichol of the University of North Carolina Law Center.

Schofield writes:

Nichol, of course, is, among many other things, the Director of the UNC Law School’s Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity and a longtime fiery critic of politicians of both parties, who ignore, abuse or take advantage of the underdogs of society. Together with Rev. William Barber of the state NAACP, Nichol led the 2012 Truth and Hope Tour of Poverty in North Carolina. He’s also been an active participant in Moral Mondays and HK on J movements, a regular opinion page contributor to Raleigh’s News & Observer and a board member of multiple progressive nonprofits – including NC Policy Watch’s parent organization, the North Carolina Justice Center.

The Pope-Civitas Institute recently “filed a public records request to obtain six weeks’ worth of Nichol’s personal email correspondence, phone logs, text messages, and calendar entries. The group won’t say what it thinks it might find with such an absurd fishing expedition, but there can be no doubt as to the actual, ultimate objective…”

In response to this outrageous attempt to intimidate Professor Nichol, hundreds of college and university scholars from 24 North Carolina institutions sent a letter of protest to Governor McCrory and State Budget Director Pope.

Here’s the letter:

To Governor McCrory and State Budget Director Art Pope,

As scholars from institutions of higher education throughout North Carolina and citizens committed to the constitutional right of free speech, we call on you to condemn the Civitas Institute’s demand for six weeks’ worth of personal email correspondence, phone logs, text messages, and calendar entries from Gene Nichol, Boyd Tinsley Distinguished Professor and Director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at the UNC School of Law.

This request is clearly in retribution for Professor Nichol’s public commentary critical of your administration. We write to both of you because it is public knowledge that, in the words of the Institute for Southern Studies, “Civitas gets over 90 percent of its funding from the Pope family foundation — so much so that the IRS classifies it as a ‘private foundation,’ a designation reserved for nonprofits that depend on a single benefactor.” Thus, citizens may reasonably infer that a sitting administration is using a private tax-exempt nonprofit organization funded by one of its leading officials to retaliate for criticism of its policies and intimidate future dissent. To our knowledge this action is unprecedented in our state’s political history.

Such an attempt at punishing speech ill befits an organization that purports in its mission statement to advance “liberty” and to “empower citizens to become better civic leaders.” Imagine if a nonprofit institution affiliated with an administration of the other party demanded the email of a conservative faculty critic. The Civitas Institute would be outraged; so would we.

Mr. Pope’s foundations are well aware that Professor Nichol is one of many North Carolina scholars who have begun publicly expressing concern about the direction of state policy since your administration took office. We believe the purpose of this action is not simply to retaliate against Professor Nichol but also to discourage future dissent from faculty in higher education. Such abuse of power to suppress critics should be condemned by all people of good will.

Scholars are citizens. Like all Americans, we have the right of free speech, freedom of assembly, and indeed the positive obligation to participate in public life “to form a more perfect Union.” Sometimes, our research expertise also bears directly on policy matters. To support smart policy and draw attention to misconceived or destructive policy is part of our responsibility as trained researchers and writers in a democratic nation.

We, the undersigned, from 61 departments and 24 institutions of higher education, call you to speak out publicly on this matter and to meet with a small delegation of faculty concerned about the future of free speech for employees of our public institutions.

Sincerely,

To see the names of the signatories and their institutions, open the link.

2013 was a horrible year for teachers and public schools in North Carolina.

The legislature and the governor passed bill after bill intended to demoralize teachers, defund public schools, and expand the transfer of public funds to privately managed schools, private schools, and religious schools.

Here, Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch describes the nine actions that were intended to crush public school teachers and privatize public education.

The movement to snuff out public education begins by funneling public dollars to private schools, home schools, and charter schools, none of which are accountable for their spending or actions.

Then it starts the dismantling of the teaching profession by turning teachers into temps, removing any due process rights.

Into the mix, increase the amount and importance of standardized testing.

And meanwhile, cut the budgets of public schools and higher education.

It’s time to quote Garrison Keillor again. I may have to quote him once a week.

“When you wage war on the public schools, you’re attacking the mortar that holds the community together. You’re not a conservative, you’re a vandal.”

― Garrison Keillor, “Homegrown Democrat: A Few Plain Thoughts from the Heart of America”

Conservatives don’t destroy their community’s public schools. Conservatives don’t blow up traditional and beloved institutions.

Conservatives don’t place the free market above human values.

In North Carolina, the cultural vandals control the state.

Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch reports that North Carolina law may permit home schools to qualify for public funding.

Nonpublic schools in North Carolina will have little or no supervision over their standards or academic performance.

Wagner writes:

“The school voucher program is intended for use at private schools only. But thanks to weak laws and a lack of capacity to ensure compliance, anyone who opens a school in their home may be able to get public money—and face little in the way of accountability.

“No academic standards required in NC voucher program

“Families in North Carolina will be able to participate in the Opportunity Scholarships program beginning with the 2014-15 academic school year.

“The new school voucher system that the General Assembly passed into law last July will provide low-income students currently enrolled in public schools with up to $4,200 annually to use at state-recognized private schools (the list of endorsed schools is viewable here).

“Lawmakers pushed for school vouchers, arguing that North Carolina’s public schools are failing its low-income and minority students and that families should have the choice—at the expense of taxpayers— to send their students to private schools as an alternative. The voucher program will siphon $10 million dollars away from the public school system in its first year, and is expected to expand in the future.

“School voucher programs have been on the rise since Milwaukee implemented them in 1990, with 13 states and the District of Columbia implementing their own voucher programs since that time.

“Private schools that receive school vouchers are typically subject to few regulatory requirements and are free to create their own standards. While some private schools hold themselves to high quality standards for their teachers and curricula, they are often not legally required to do so.

“Milwaukee has become known for rampant fraud and abuse of its voucher program —and its poor educational outcomes. The founder and principal of Milwaukee’s Mandella School of Science and Math used taxpayer funds to purchase his own Mercedes, and a recent study concluded that Milwaukee students participating in the voucher program performed significantly worse in both reading and math than students in the Milwaukee public school system.

“North Carolina law requires nothing in the way of academic standards, curricula or accountability measures for its non-public schools.”

– See more at: http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2013/12/12/taxpayer-funds-may-be-funneled-to-home-schools-through-school-vouchers/#sthash.uiR3M0rJ.dpuf

Teachers in North Carolina are leaving their schools at a significantly higher rate this year.

The governor and legislature have targeted teachers for punitive measures, and they are succeeding in making teaching a less desirable career path.

Lindsay Wagner of NC Policy Watch reports:

“In 2008-09, only 35.55 percent of teachers who had tenure, also known as “career status,” left their jobs. That percentage has steadily risen and last year nearly half (49.35%) of all of those who left their positions were tenured teachers.

Mooresville Graded School District Superintendent Dr. Mark Edwards said it’s important to consider the fact that the state will see large numbers of baby boomers retiring during the next five years or so.

“We need to recruit people to stay,” said Edwards to his colleagues at this month’s State Board of Education meeting in Raleigh.

North Carolina ranks 46th in the nation in teacher pay. It takes 15 years for a teacher to make about $40,000 a year.

Last summer, state lawmakers decided to stop funding the North Carolina Teaching Fellows program, which awards scholarships to North Carolina high school students to pursue teaching degrees in state. Graduates then must teach for four years in North Carolina. More than 75 percent of Teaching Fellows teach in the state beyond five years, and many stay on for their entire careers.

Lawmakers took some of the money designated for the Teaching Fellows program and put it toward expanding the state’s presence of Teach For America (TFA), a national program designed to place graduates without degrees in education in teaching posts that are in low-performing schools.”

You can see where this is going.

As the state pushes out experienced teachers and eliminates its Teaching Fellows program, it clears the way to hire more inexperienced TFA, who pledge to stay for only two years. Call it turmoil by design.

Eric Guckian, the governor’s senior education advisor, is a TFA alumnus.

– See more at: http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2013/12/05/teacher-turnover-in-north-carolina-significantly-higher-than-previous-year/#sthash.xL5z2KML.dpuf

The Board of Education in New Hanover County, North Carolina, passed a resolution opposing the state legislature’s plan to offer bonuses to 25% of teachers in exchange for their abandoning their due process rights. The board–in Wilmington, North Carolina–is Republican dominated. When the resolution passed, the audience at the board meeting–many of whom were teachers, wearing red–burst into applause.

The local Star-News Online reported that the board:

“…..unanimously passed a resolution against the N.C. General Assembly’s mandate requiring 25 percent of teachers in each district to receive a bonus and an early move to a four-year contract instead of tenure. The decision received loud applause from the dozens of red-clad teachers in the audience.

“The General Assembly voted during this year’s session to eliminate teacher tenure, moving teachers instead to one-, two- or four-year contracts. That will be put fully in place by the 2017-18 school year. But districts can select the top 25 percent of their teachers and offer them a $500 annual bonus to move off tenure this year. The legislature set aside $10 million statewide to pay those bonuses.

“Adopting the resolution was a largely symbolic move, Markley said, since the legislature reconvenes for its short session in May and selected teachers must choose whether to accept the bonus by the end of June. But board members said they still felt strongly about stating their displeasure with the plan.

“Give us wiggle room,” said board member Lisa Estep. “Give us the ability to be innovative.”

“Chairman Don Hayes said he hoped the board’s decision would motivate other boards to take a similar stand.”

Here is the Board’s resolution:

RESOLUTION BEFORE THE
NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION REGARDING CHANGES TO TEACHER EMPLOYMENT LAW

December 3rd, 2013

WHEREAS, the Appropriations Act of 2013 (SL 2013 36, SB 402, Sec. 9.6), includes legislation that requires school boards to offer four-year contracts and bonuses to 25 percent of its teachers (“25 percent contract”); and

WHEREAS, school districts are finding it difficult to select a method of determining who qualifies for the four-year contract offer; and

WHEREAS, school boards value their teachers and believe them to be deserving of adequate and equitable compensation; and

WHEREAS, teachers have received only a 1.12 percent state salary increase once out of the past five years, resulting in a greater need by school districts to increase recruitment and retention of teachers; and

WHEREAS, the Appropriations Act of 2013 cut funding for classroom teachers, teacher assistants, textbooks, instructional materials, and limited English proficiency, while continuing the elimination of funding for mentor pay and professional development.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Hanover County Board of Education requests that the General Assembly allow it to retain its prorated share of the $10 Million Dollars allocated for the 25 percent contract to be used for alternative pay or compensation for additional duties such as mentoring or leadership roles; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that the New Hanover County Board of Education urges the North Carolina General Assembly to repeal the 25 percent contract and develop a more effective long-term compensation plan for teachers tied to career paths with input from the education and business community.

NEW HANOVER COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
By:_____________________________________ DONALD HAYES, Chairman