Archives for category: New York

The New York City parent blog reports that there will be Legislative hearings this Friday in lower Manhattan on student privacy, a matter of great concerns to parents (and grandparents!).

“The hearings will take place Friday, Feb. 28 at 10:30 AM at 250 Broadway in Lower Manhattan; livestream here.  More info and a form you can fill out if you want  to testify is here.  See also the RT video interview from NYC parent activist Karen Sprowal on why she opposes inBloom and feels it will put at risk her child’s privacy and security on our blog below; please also sign the MoveOn petition to stop inBloom in New York state here. 

Despite massive objections from parents, New York is the only state that plans to hand over confidential student information to inBloom, which was funded by the Gates Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation, and will be managed by Rupert Murdoch’s Wireless Generation and Amplify.

No one has ever offered a satisfactory explanation about why the federal government, the state, and vendors need 400 data points about every child.

Show up; testify; raise your voice.

Don’t let them have the data about your child.

 

 

New York officials say they will release confidential student data in July to Rupert Murdoch and Bill Gates’ inBloom, despite parental protests and a futile lawsuit. Why the unseemly rush to give away student information?

Meanwhile a California legislator has introduced a proposal to protect student privacy.

The California law is sponsored by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg:

“A leading California lawmaker plans to introduce state legislation on Thursday that would shore up privacy and security protections for the personal information of students in elementary through high school, a move that could alter business practices across the nearly $8 billion education technology software industry.

“The bill would prohibit education-related websites, online services and mobile apps for kindergartners through 12th graders from compiling, using or sharing the personal information of those students in California for any reason other than what the school intended or for product maintenance.

“The bill would also prohibit the operators of those services from using or disclosing the information of students in the state for commercial purposes like marketing. It would oblige the firms to encrypt students’ data in transit and at rest, and it would require them to delete a student’s record when it is no longer needed for the purpose the school intended.”

What part of “privacy” do New York officials not understand or care about? Or is their zeal to share a part of the ill-fated Race to the Top project to build a massive data warehouse for vendors?

Doug Noble is a member of Rochester’s Coalition for Justice in Education. He wrote this letter to the editor of the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle.
.

Editor:

The D&C Feb 11 editorial “Committed to Common Core” reveals a
remarkable willingness to swallow the Common Core Kool Aid
and to accuse of “posturing” its many critics, including parents’
groups, teachers and their unions, who have moved Regents and state leaders to action.

This long overdue resistance, though, is hardly “posturing.” These
critics, with counterparts across the country, have conducted “close
readings” of the curriculum and policy materials while documenting the
damage done to children and to schools. They have analyzed the
glaringly inappropriate pedagogy, researched the dubious corporate
history, and understood fully the premature, flawed implementation.

They could serve as a perfect role model of the very “critical thinking” the Common Core allegedly champions.

The D&C editorial explains that “systemic change is never easy,”
unmindful that the Common Core, rather than any kind of change, is
really more of the same.

Common Core has been in the works for decades. It is nothing but the
culmination of more than 25 years of a well financed, power-brokered
campaign orchestrated by opportunist politicians seeking a
standardized silver bullet for education and by corporate profiteers
seeking a national education market ripe for their ventures and wares.

These antidemocratic intrusions of standards, curricula, tests, and
management schemes have been distracting schools and educators from
authentic improvement for decades, with such labels as “America
2000,” “Goals 2000,” No Child Left Behind, “Race to the Top,” and now “Common Core,” all with the identical agenda.

The D&C editorial reminds us that “lost amid all this posturing are
New York’s students, including those in Rochester’s schools.” As if
all these concerned teachers and parents have somehow forgotten them.
As if enthusiastic, autonomous and unafraid teachers are somehow not
essential to helping them. And as if Common Core curriculum standards
will somehow address the grueling concentration of child poverty that
is the real source of poor student performance. No, the critics have
not lost sight of the students, as Common Core evangelists repeatedly
insinuate. On the other hand, to paraphrase Samuel Johnson, trumpeting students’ welfare while throwing them under the bus in the name of reform is the last refuge of education’s scoundrels.

Doug Noble
268 Brunswick St, Rochester, NY 14607

Governor Cuomo created a panel to review the flawed rollout of the Common Core. His panel is stacked with supporters of Common Core. The governor invited the public to offer suggestions. Here is one from Jeff Nichols, a parent of children in the New York City public schools and a professor at Queens College and the GraduateCenter of the City of New Yrk:

Professor Nichols writes:

The Common Core Implementation Panel has invited suggestions from the public. Here’s mine, submitted to them this morning.

* * *

My suggestion is very simple:

Withdraw from the Common Core.

No recommendation this panel can come up with will salvage the CCSS, for a very simple reason. Ever growing numbers of parents like me reject the entire concept of federally mandated standards. And when standards are tied to funding, that is a form of mandate.

I consider myself a liberal Democrat. I voted twice for Barack Obama. But I am as offended by the design and implementation of CCSS as the tea party Republicans who oppose all federal interventions in their lives.

Why? The CCSS are expensive, mediocre, redundant and were adopted without due democratic process. They are, in short, a boondoggle perpetrated on the public by politicians who are either ignorant of real educational needs or under the sway of private interests that stand to profit enormously from this initiative.

As a taxpayer, I want the state’s education dollars dedicated to measures that actually improve student learning. The Common Core standards are completely unproven and, judging from early results, ineptly designed — too demanding in early grades, not demanding enough in later ones. Moreover, they come twinned with a new wave of useless and phenomenally expensive standardized tests. My wife and I will opt our children out of all state tests at least until all of New York State has implemented universal pre-K and high quality day care for low-income working families, until every child has the opportunity to learn a musical instrument and has access to the kinds of libraries, gyms and other vital faculties that children who live in affluent communities take for granted.

Our position is not going to change because NYSED acknowledges some errors in its implementation of CCSS. We demand the return of control over curriculum and teaching methods to educators, parents and local communities. The state can feel free to issue recommendations for curriculum, but not the kinds of mandates that have been flowing from CCSS.

All my wife and I want is for our children’s teachers to have the same intellectual freedom to practice their profession according to their best judgment as that enjoyed teachers in the exclusive private schools attended by the children of Barack Obama, Arne Duncan and John King.

That was the reality in my own childhood, growing up attending locally controlled rural public schools in Indiana. In that not-so-distant time and place, high-stakes standardized tests didn’t exist prior to the SAT — and that was optional. Teachers assessed children; principals, fellow teachers and parents assessed teachers. It worked a heck of a lot better than the test-based, wasteful and counterproductive accountability systems of the NCLB era.

The Common Core, like all assaults on democracy, is the product of fear — in this case, that our children will fall behind in the global economy. But what those of us who are actually raising the next generation of Americans understand is that the way to address that fear is not to cede control of our children’s schools to David Coleman and Arne Duncan.

Americans of all political persuasions know that the only thing we should fear and fight against is the erosion of our democracy. A pluralistic, locally governed and free public school system is the bedrock of that democracy, and it will be restored — not by state and federal bureaucrats, but by families like mine.

Children with disabilities have many struggles to deal with. Public officials should do their best to remove the obstacles these children confront, not add to them.

This is a statement written by Bianca Tanis, a parent of a child with disabilities.

Here is an excerpt:

“As of Tuesday, 2/11, Members of the NYS Assembly completed interviews of both new and incumbent candidates for the 4 positions that are up for re-appointment on the NYS Board of Regents. In light of the failure of the Board of Regents to heed parent concerns, coupled with a Regents Task Force Report that is at best misinformed and at worst duplicitous, the legislature must elect new leadership to the Board. When the legislators vote to decide who will fill these 4 spots on March 11th, parents and educators will be watching.

“Parents of students with disabilities have been vocally opposed to not only the flawed implementation of the CCLS, but also the deep flaws within the standards themselves and the ways in which they promote poor instructional practice for special education students. One of the Regents up for reappointment is Christine Cea, the Regent from Staten Island who calls herself the “voice of disabilities.” You can watch her interview with members of the Assembly Education Committee here.

“There is little doubt that as a parent of a child with a disability and a researcher for the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities , Regent Cea has the best intentions. However, after watching her interview, it is difficult to believe that she is the most qualified person to represent the educational needs of students with disabilities in New York.

“Regent Cea side stepped questions and gave vague, general answers. When asked where in her opinion, special education is going and what direction it should take, Ms. Cea offered the less than insightful response, “We are seeing great strides in getting people independent and doing more and more.” When asked what she hopes to accomplish in her next term if elected, Regent Cea responded, “I moved very comfortably into the spot of being the disability voice and I just hope to do more…I hope to take this transition piece (transition to the CC) and make it into something special.” Special?

“Perhaps most disturbing was Regent Cea’s complete and utter lack of understanding of the ways in which the CCLS are impacting students with disabilities in the classroom.”

Tanis then reprints the interview.

New York parents, especially in the politically powerful suburbs of Long Island and Westchester-Putnam, are outraged by the failure of the New York Board of Regents to take more decisive steps to fix the Common Core.

They want a thorough review of the standards by New York practitioners, and not those picked by CC-loving Commissioner John King. They want a true moratorium on the CC testing until the standards are made developmentally appropriate. Some want to eliminate them and use New York’s existing standards.

The consensus seems to be that the Regents tried to pull the wool over the eyes of the public, but parents were not fooled by half-measures.

The leading education reform of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s campaign was universal pre-kindergarten, funded by a small tax increase on city residents with income over $500,000.

Governor Cuomo opposes any new taxes.

So do State Senate Republicans, who announced that the tax idea was dead.

Shame on them.

If residents of NYC want to tax themselves, why should they block it?

The real cost of the tax increase is a few dollars a day for the richest.

The Regents pledged to tweak the botched Common Core rollout, which caused Governor Cuomo to accuse them of backing away from tough teacher evaluation (they didn’t).

Now parents and educators condemn the Regents for failing to address their concerns:

From: “NYS Allies for Public Education”
Date: February 10, 2014 at 4:40:37 PM EST

To: “‘NYS Allies for Public Education'”

Subject: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE- Parents and Educators Outraged by Regents Unwillingness to Assume Responsibility and Change Course
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 10, 2014

More information contact:
Eric Mihelbergel (716) 553-1123; nys.allies@gmail.com
Lisa Rudley (917) 414-9190; nys.allies@gmail.com
NYS Allies for Public Education http://www.nysape.org

Parents and Educators Outraged by Regents Unwillingness to Assume Responsibility and Change Course

The leaders of the NYS Allies for Public Education (NYSAPE), a coalition of more than 45 parent and educator groups from throughout the state, expressed extreme disappointment that the NYS Regent Common Core Taskforce refused to address the real issues undermining education in this state and made only minor tweaks to current policies. The report is quite clear that the Regents continue to ignore the deep flaws in the Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS), excessive high stakes state testing and student data sharing. The recommendations can be viewed here: http://www.regents.nysed.gov/meetings/2014/February2014/214p12hea3.pdf

Tim Farley, a parent of four public school children and the Principal of Ichabod Crane Elementary/Middle School said, “Today’s recommendations from Commissioner King and the Regents task force reveal just how out of touch they are and how obsessive their appetite is for excessive state tests. The fact that they refuse to subject their own children to these excessive testing and data policies is very telling. The parents and educators of New York have been paying attention, and they are justifiably outraged.”

“The need to replace the four incumbent Regents members is more important than ever,” said Eric Mihelbergel, Ken-Ton public school parent and founding member of NYSAPE. The Regents Taskforce failed to address the real concerns of parents and again has displayed disconnect from their constituents. Their recommendations today tell me the State is full steam ahead with this failed reform agenda.”

Carol Burris, South Side High Principal and 2013 Principal of the Year stated, “For a deliberative body that is so insistent that students, schools and educators be held accountable, their unwillingness to assume responsibility for their blunders and respond by correcting course is breathtaking. For example, they shift the review of the New York State Common Core standards to the National Governors Association, rather than assume that responsibility themselves. At nearly every turn they “advocate”, or “encourage” others to take action, rather than earnestly respond to what they heard. Developing a “teacher portal” and more low quality materials, is hardly the response our parents expected. The tinkering with dates and semantics about college ready scores at the high school level provides no relief for our K-8 students from testing or from the implementation of flawed curriculum. ”

“Instead of simply calling for a delay in the uploading of private student data onto an insecure data cloud, and pass the responsibility to deal with this issue to the Legislature, the Regents should have insisted that the inBloom contract be cancelled, as every other state has done. Why should New York continue to be the worst place in the country when it comes to student privacy?” asked Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of Class Size Matters.

“The notion that more time to phase in standards or train teachers will somehow cure the ills of a deficient curriculum and inappropriate tests is misguided. Just as troubling is the suggestion that teachers should continue to be evaluated on the basis of a system no one believes in, and that if they are threatened with losing their jobs, they should “raise an alleged failure” of their districts to properly implement the Common Core – when the fault lies with the state. There is no need for more money to ‘engage’ parents with implementation of CCLS. Parents have made their voices perfectly clear in demanding that these destructive policies be brought to an immediate halt,” said Jessica McNair, New Hartford public school parent.

“The Regents appear not to understand that the actual time spent on testing per day, multiplied out over six days of the state assessments, is inappropriate for all students despite the misleading statistics quoted in recommendations,” stated Chris Cerrone, Western New York public school parent of two elementary-aged children.

“Our state education system remains in turmoil, yet the recommendations of this task force do nothing to address the profound problems associated with the standards and excessive high stakes testing. They simply echo the false sentiments of Chancellor Tisch and Commissioner King, by providing nothing more than superficial suggestions in an attempt to pacify the public. Parents will not be so easily assuaged,” said Jeanette Deutermann, Bellmore public school parent and founder of Long Island Opt-Out.

###

Governor Andrew Cuomo released a statement blasting the Regents for seeming to delay the tough teacher evaluation that Cuomo wants.

Common Core has turned into a giant mess. The Regents and Commissioner John King want to appear to compromise without compromising.

The governor condemns them for compromising.

Here is the Regents’ statement.

This is the report of the Regents Working Group that came up with tweaks.

The governor said this:

Andrew M. Cuomo – Governor
Statement From Governor Cuomo

Albany, NY (February 10, 2014)

“Today’s recommendations are another in a series of missteps by the Board of Regents that suggests the time has come to seriously reexamine its capacity and performance. These recommendations are simply too little, too late for our parents and students.

“Common Core is the right goal and direction as it is vital that we have a real set of standards for our students and a meaningful teacher evaluation system.

However, Common Core’s implementation in New York has been flawed and mismanaged from the start.

“As far as today’s recommendations are concerned, there is a difference between remedying the system for students and parents and using this situation as yet another excuse to stop the teacher evaluation process.

“The Regents’ response is to recommend delaying the teacher evaluation system and is yet another in a long series of roadblocks to a much needed evaluation system which the Regents had stalled putting in place for years.

“I have created a commission to thoroughly examine how we can address these issues. The commission has started its work and we should await their recommendations so that we can find a legislative solution this session to solve these problems.”

###

Even as the Néw York Board of Regents made minor tweaks to the Common Core standards and testing, a poll by News 12, Long Island’s only TV news station, showed simmering anti – Common Core sentiment in this crucial suburban area.

8% say Delay It
86% say Eliminate It
6% say Leave It Alone

Long Island has been a hotbed of anti-Common Core activism.

A special committee of the Regents reviewed the botched implementation.

The committee proposed asking the original writers of the standards to review them, instead of assembling Néw York’s best teachers to do a review.

Very odd recommendation. The National Governors Association, the Council of Chief State School Officers, and Student Achievement Partners wrote the standards. Why would the Refents expect these inside-the-beltway, Gates-funded groups to know how to fix them?

Why not trust the state’s practitioners who know the students and know how to improve the standards?