Archives for category: New York City

Testing expert Fred Smith explains here why New York City Chancellor Carmen Farina should say no to the Pearson field tests.

The field tests waste instructional time. They benefit the publisher, not the students.

“Here are some arguments the chancellor could use:

*Because students know the stand-alone field tests don’t count and are of no consequence to them, they are not motivated to do well, especially in lovely June weather. This skews the data and fails to provide Pearson with reliable “intelligence” needed to furnish good exams.

*Proof that stand-alone field testing is an unworkable approach to test development lies in the poorly constructed ELA and math exams that were given in 2012 and 2013. Witness the criticism from teachers and parents across the state on both exams.

*The field tests have proceeded because the state has created a top-down system that inhibits principals and teachers from telling parents about them or seeking permission for their children to take them.

*A definitive analysis of federal legislation and state rules and regulations has found no legal basis requiring schools to give, or parents to go along with, the tests.”

During the decade or so in which Mayor Michael Bloomberg totally controlled the public schools of New York City, he relied on test scores as the measure of students, teachers, principals, and schools. His was a managerial mindset devoid of any philosophy of education or of any concern for the lives of individuals or communities. Collateral damage was unimportant, and many people fell under his wheels. His primary strategy was to close schools with low scores and open new schools. He believed in small schools, even though few of these schools had the facilities or staff for English language learners, students with disabilities, or advanced classes in math or science or anything else. After he had been in office for a number of years, he was closing some of the new schools. The central office could literally murder a school by directing large numbers of low-scoring students to it, which was a death sentence. As schools began to die (and he had a particular hatred for large schools), good students moved out and the death cycle was accelerated as the stats looked worse and worse.

What happened to the teachers in the schools marked for closure? Some got out as fast as they could, others stayed in their post, either because they were devoted to the school and hoped it would be saved if they tried harder or because they felt committed to the students. When the school at last was closed, many tenured teachers were set adrift. They could apply to other schools but because they were experienced, they were expensive and many principals preferred to have two new teachers than one veteran. So the teachers without a school were placed in what was called the Absent Teacher Reserve (ATR), where they stayed on salary but floated through the system as substitutes or short-timers. The press regularly ridiculed them as incompetents, although most had lost their job through no fault of their own, and some or many were expert teachers.

In this post, Lynne Winderbaum tells the story of the ATRs. She is a retired ESL teacher.

The following letter was written by a principal in Néw York City. He describes what so many educators feel: Education is being destroyed by excessive, pointless testing. The sad fact is that testing no longer functions as a way to inform teachers and parents and to help children but as a blunt instrument to wear children down and demoralize their teachers.

Subject: Student and testing burn out.

“Today, we had a few students that did not write a thing for the essay on today’s practice CCLS English Regents. The exam was tough and kids were burnt out.

“Once upon a time, there was an English Regents exam.The exam was a total of 6 hours over two days in which students had to write 2 essays. The new exam requires 2 essays, reading 10 pieces of text and answering multiple-choice questions that resemble AP/SAT subject questions. CRAZY!!!

“The combined testing of city and state, coupled with practice exams to ready the students for the tests are having a major impact.

“We are exhausting the children.
Exhausting testing team staff.
Distracting testing team staff from instructional and professional development work (Testing team personnel are usually out of classroom coaches/pd providers, etc.)
Losing Instructional time when students are taking the exams and when they are covered by subs so their teachers can grade exams.

“Exhausting a lot of money, not just in copying and administrative, processing, mailing costs, but in the hiring of subs so that teachers can score the exams.
Someone should look at the true cost of testing to this degree via RTTT mandates.

“I wonder every day whether the benefits will be worth the weight of the burden.

“I am not an advocate for no testing. I love accountability that results in action (adjustments to curriculum, professional development, intervention plans/actions, or removal, retraining, or reassignment of poor performing staff.

“I am just wondering how these exams can be made more civil for children.
They are almost a form of corporal punishment.

“Eight year olds sitting for 3 days straight for math and ELA state exams. Schools doing all of this testing and being forced by the state to administer field tests.

“It seems like unnecessary overkill.
The city giving exams in fall and spring in order to create these “local measures” for RTTT mandate.

“Perhaps the tests should be only state exams…
A November exam and a late May/June exam that is half the length of the current exams…
This way we eliminate the need for some of the city local measures for pre and post.
We can also garner a growth measure between a child’s results in late November and late May/June which can factor into the teacher rating.

“Anyway, this was a hard year. I would argue harder than Hurricane Sandy…all due to the policies that adults make devoid of practitioner in the field or principal input.

“There is so much talk out there about respecting communication and input from parents, etc.

“Yet, the centralization of power in one place has a few people pushing agendas on localities devoid of sincere and respected input.

“Sort of like the criticism incurred by the community boards in city neighborhoods that have no local code legislative or enforcement power…some argue they are there for the illusion of democracy so that a few powerful entities can make policy that permits developers and other agendas to have their way.

“Sorry for the negative information, but this has been a tough year and the conduits of input from the extremities to the heart are few and far between.

“Sincerely,

XXXXXXX

Francesco Portelos, tenured teacher in Néw York City, was just exonerated after a suspension that lasted 826 days. The Néw York City Department of Education tried to fire him, but he refused to leave. Nearly $1 million was spent in this long ordeal. Just recently, Portelos won, was exonerated, given a $10,000 fine for some minor offense, and restored to his classroom. No, wait, he was not restored to his classsropm; he is being rotated from class to class, without an assignment.

Here is the latest:

Subject: Big news from NYC Educator Exile. A Big Score for Teacher Tenure!
From: mrportelos@gmail.com
To: daughtersofbukowski@gmail.com

Good afternoon fellow educators,

Just sharing exciting news here in NYC. After the NYC DOE tried so hard to fire me for over two years, after 826 days they found out they failed. This is why tenure is important. Let the corporate reformers know. Thanks for your support!

DOE vs Portelos Termination Verdict Is In 826 Days After They Took Aim to Fire.

http://wp.me/p31ecs-YI

Francesco A. Portelos
Parent
Educator
IS 49 UFT Chapter Leader
EducatorFightsBack.org
DTOE.org

“In the end, we will not remember the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.” -Martin Luther King Jr.
Yu

Taking Back OUR Schools Rally & March – NYC Metro

May 17 @ 2:00 pm – 5:00 pm

On the steps of City Hall

“Declaration, Protest, Successes, and Call to Action”

Calling all NYC Metro Area community activists, the “voices of resistance”, families, students, civil rights advocates, voters, immigrant families, policymakers and legislators, union members, teachers, faith leaders, and all communities that believe in a good public education for all!

Join us in a march and rally seeking to create & sustain a public school system that provides a fully funded, equitable, community-based education for every child. This means that decisions about our children’s schooling would be made democratically by families and professional educators, free of corporate and political intervention.

Featuring a Message from Diane Ravitch

Speaking will be: Mark Naison, Brian Jones, Carol Burris, Jeannette Deutermann, Leonie Haimson, Joe Rella, Jose Vilson, NYC student “J”, Marla Kilfoyle, Melissa Tomlinson, Monty Neill, Dao Tran, Ken Mitchell, Daiyu Suzuki, Akinlabi Mackall, Muba Yarofulani, Rosie Frascella, Stephanie Rivera, Bianca Tanis, Lisa Winter.

Entertaining will be: Terry Moore and Friends, Raging Grannies, Jeremy Dudley, and The Rude Mechanical Orchesta.

Participating groups:

Alliance for Quality Education – BATS – Black New Yorkers for Educational Excellence (BNYEE) – Change The Stakes – Central Brooklyn Independent Democrats – Children Are More Than Test Scores – Class Size Matters – The Coalition for Educational Justice CEJ – Coalition for Public Education-Communities United New Jersey -Connie Hogarth Center for Social Action at Manhattanville College – EDU4 – FairTest- iCOPE–Hudson Valley Against Common Core -Lace to the Top – Lambda Independent Democrats of Brooklyn– LI Opt Out – MORE –NAACP MID Manhattan-Network for Public Education-Newark Students Union-New Caucus of Newark- New Jersey Education Association (NJEA)- New York Allies for Public Education – NY PRINCIPALS .ORG – NY Student Union –NYCORE – Parents Across America – Parent Leadership Project-Parent Voices NY- Parents to Improve School Transportation – Port Jeff Station Teachers Association– Radical Women -Reclaiming the Conversation on Education – Save Our Schools (SOS) – Save Our Schools-NJ –S.E.E.D.S. (SEEDSWORK) – Stop Common Core in New York State – Students Not Scores LI –Students United for Public Education (SUPE) – Teachers United – Time Out from Testing-UFT-United Opt Out National-Ya Ya Network-

__._,_.___

__,_._,___

While the New York Times and the New York Post continue to recycle the press releases about the awesomeness of charter schools. One newspaper’s reporters tell the unvarnished story. While the editorial board of the New York Daily News, owned by billionaire Mort Zuckerman, continues to dispense charter Kool-aid, the reporters at the News distinguish themselves by writing story after story about outrageous rentals, conflicts of interest, greed, and outright fraud.

What do you think is likely to happen when an organization gets a steady stream of taxpayer dolls but is unregulated and unsupervised?

One day a newspaper will win a Pulitzer Prize for unraveling the charter industry, its political strategy, its gaming the system for higher scores, and its adroit use of the profit motive to incentivize “innovation.”

In her testimony to the New York City Council Education Committee, education activist Leonie Haimson of Class Size Matters exploded several common myths about charter schools.

 

First is the myth that they are public schools. They are not. They are private corporations with contracts to run schools, exempt from most state laws and from most state oversight. In court after court, the charters themselves have argued that they are NOT public schools. We should take their word for it. They are not public schools.

 

Second is the myth that charter schools enroll exactly the same demographic of students as the real public schools. This is patently false. With few exceptions, they take smaller proportions of students with disabilities and almost no students with severe disabilities, and they enroll smaller proportions of English language learners. They have the power to kick out students who do not meet their stringent disciplinary codes, which leaves them with a very different student population than public schools. Meanwhile, neighborhood public schools get disproportionate numbers of the students who are most expensive and most difficult to educate. This is not a fair playing field on which to compete. The original purpose of charters was to collaborate, not to compete, yet charter schools take every opportunity to boast of their success with a select population of students.

 

If you want to know about the other four myths, read the rest of the post.

Who Needs to Learn from Whom? What Public Schools can Teach Charter Schools About Teaching All Students. The New York Times published a story about what public schools can learn fro charter schools. But the most important lesson is to be careful which students are admitted.

The role of charter schools in public education continues to be a subject of heated debate. The House of Representatives recently passed a bi-partisan bill that would provide additional sources of funding for charter schools. At the same time they rejected rules that would require charter schools to report teacher attrition rates, student discipline data, and enrollment data. They also rejected conflict of interest guidelines for charters.

Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader, is visiting a charter school in New York City today “to rip Mayor de Blasio over charter schools.” He has repeatedly said that de Blasio’s skepticism about charters is a “war on kids.” The very same day the New York Times published a story on the “chasm” between public and charter schools. The story, which mentions the school that Cantor is planning to visit, spins a story about how charter schools should be “test kitchens for practices that could be exported into the traditional schools.” It praises two charter schools (Kings Collegiate Charter School and Bronx Charter School for Excellence) that share their insights with two neighboring public schools (Middle School for Art and Philosophy and P.S. 085 Great Expectations).

But the numbers raise some questions. The school that Cantor visited today, the Bronx Charter School for Excellence, serves 72% fewer English Language Learners and 55% fewer special needs students than its neighbor, P.S. 085. The charter school serves exactly zero of the highest need special education students– while over 16% of the public school’s students are highest need special education. And the charter school has a student population that is over 210% more economically privileged, as measured by the New York City Department of Education’s economic need index, than the public school’s.

The other charter to public school comparison shows the same pattern. The Times claimed, “it too, served large numbers of low-income black students, many from the same neighborhoods.” This is inaccurate. King Collegiate serves a student population that is 35% more economically privileged than the Middle School for Art and Philosophy, as measured by the New York City Department of Education’s economic need index. The charter school has 95% fewer English Language Learners and 55% fewer special needs students than the public school. The charter has exactly zero of the highest need special education students while, in the co-located public school, over 11% of the student population consists of the highest need special education students. Even with these advantages only 12% of the 8th graders who graduate from the charter school stayed on-track in credit accumulation in 9th grade versus 80% of the public schools students.

Of course, the teachers at these schools should continue to collaborate and share ideas with one another. But what is not OK is the big lie that is being told about the relative success of the schools. If there is a war being waged on kids, as Cantor has claimed, it is the charter schools and their supporters who are waging war on English Language Learners, on students with special needs, and on poor students.

The data show that the biggest ingredient of the charter school recipe is that they educate students with greater incoming advantages than public schools. Many also kick out students who don’t do well on tests. This is not a lesson we want public schools to learn. We want our public schools to teach every single child. We do not need charter schools to know that schools that serve more privileged groups of student have higher test scores.

The skepticism that de De Blasio has expressed about charters is well earned. As long as charter schools as a sector refuse to educate the neediest students, they are best viewed as the mechanism for ultimately sorting all of the neediest students into the educational equivalents of Bantustans. Those Bantustans will be called “public schools.” As long as charter school interest groups are able to get politicians to vote against transparency for charter schools we will never be able to hold them to the mission of public education– which is to educate every single child.

What a difference one election makes! For a dozen years, New York City had a Department of Education and a Mayor who viewed teachers with disdain. At best, they were checkers on a checkerboard controlled from “downtown,” doing the bidding of business-school graduates or TFA wonders who had little regard for veterans. Now, with a new mayor and a chancellor who is an experienced educator, the tone has changed. Tone matters. Respect matters. Words matter. Here is a message from Chancellor Carmen Farina to every teacher and principal in New York City.

 

 

 
Chancellor’s Memo

This week’s Chancellor’s Memo is a message for your teachers; it was sent via email to all principals and teachers on May 6.
Dear Colleagues,
Few of us remember the teachers who made us spend hours memorizing and spouting back facts. But none of us forget the ones who, with a gentle nudge or a kind word, convinced us that we could achieve endless opportunity. Sister Leonard, my English language arts teacher, was one of the memorable ones.
As a sophomore in high school, I decided to become a teacher. But unbeknownst to me, I was on a non-academic track, taking typing and stenography instead of math and other credit-bearing courses like many classmates. My advisor had apparently decided that a daughter of Spanish immigrants lacked the aptitude and wherewithal to attend college. Sister Leonard made my cause her personal mission. With her support, I caught up on all the math classes I’d missed, took the Spanish Regents exam—and became the first person in my family to go to college.
One great teacher can transform a life.

On this Teacher Appreciation Day, I want to recognize you—the City’s 75,000 public school teachers—for the countless lives you transform. Thank you for showing up every day, bringing joy to our classrooms, and working tirelessly to provide all of our students with a first-rate education.
I know this isn’t an easy job. As a New York City public school teacher for 22 years, I have walked thousands of miles in your shoes. As Chancellor, it is now my privilege to walk alongside you. My focus will always be on the critical work you do in the classroom.
As we embark on this journey together, I encourage you to think about teaching as a craft and a profession. Whether you are beginning your career in the classroom or are a veteran in our schools, our 1.1 million students rely on you. We want to help you cultivate your passion, achieve excellence, and take your skills to levels you never dreamed possible.
Thanks to our proposed contract with the teachers union, we will be able to deliver unparalleled professional learning: teachers will have a 75- to 80-minute block of time every week to share successful practices. You will have more time for parent engagement; you can even schedule appointments. In addition, the new contract offers excellent educators formal opportunities to hone their classroom practices, develop their leadership skills, and collaborate with and support other educators to improve student achievement. These are monumental changes that will help return dignity and respect to the profession. Going forward, we will give you more tools you need to succeed, including Town Halls just for teachers, and unprecedented on-the-ground support.
In honor of the hard work you do for our school children, I ask you to take some time today to remember a student whose life you have changed: the student who, like me, became the first person in her family to graduate from college; the student who has a career because you cared enough to see the potential others missed. These are the reasons we teach.
Thank you for making a difference in our children’s lives.
Warmly,
Carmen Fariña
Chancellor