Archives for category: KIPP Charter Schools

Paul Thomas is unimpressed by the latest study of KIPP by Mathematica Policy Research.

He firmly rejects the “no excuses” model of schooling, in which students are constantly monitored and disciplined for the smallest infractions. He believes it is classist and racist.

His main point is that the means do not justify the ends. If one’s only goal is higher test scores, they can be produced by coercion. But that is not good education. It old be akin to amputating a limg as a means of weight loss: it works but why would you do it.

Thomas quotes David Whitman, who wrote a book lauding “the new paternalism.” It is called “Sweating the Small Stuff,” a paean to no-excuses schools. (One of them, the American Indian Charter School in Oakland, may be closed because of financial improprieties by its intemperate founder [not because the school–intent on getting higher test scores–has few students of American Indian origin]). Interestingly, Whitman is Arne Duncan’s speech-writer. This explains in part why Duncan is such a big fan of “no excuses” schools. Schools for “other people’s children.”

Bruce Baker looks closely at the latest Mathematica Policy Research study of KIPP and draws some useful lessons.

Mathematica says KIPP is more successful than the nearby public schools.

Why?

Baker shows that KIPP spends substantially more (in some districts, $5,000 more per student), has smaller class sizes, higher salaries, “coupled with a dose of old-fashioned sit-down-and-shut up classroom/behavior management and a truckload of standardized testing. Nothin’ too sexy there. Nothin’ that reformy. Nothin’ particularly creative.”

Matt Di Carlo estimates that it would cost the New York City Department of Education an additional $688 million to get the same results in middle schools, and only $72 million in Houston.

Di Carlo has been saying for a long time that it is not “charterness” that is so special, but what charters do that produce higher scores: spend more money, reduce class size, pay more to teachers, etc.

That is, if parents want their children to be in a no-excuses school with strict disciplinary rules and “a truckload of standardized testing.”

Mathematica Policy Research has good news for KIPP. Their students make significant gains. The press release follows with a link to the report and summary of the findings.

A few questions occur to me about the replicability of the KIPP model.

First, KIPP has raised hundreds of millions of dollars from philanthropists and the U.S. Department of Education. Does that extra money translate into smaller classes and other perks? If not, what is it used for?

Second, to what extent do KIPP students benefit from peer effects, in that the comparison group is attending schools with kids with more problems and issues than those in KIPP?

Third, will KIPP ever take on the challenge of an entire small impoverished (I call it “the KIPP Challenge”)? So long as they take some but not all, the suspicion of selective attrition and exclusion will linger.

Here is the press release.

New Report Finds KIPP Middle Schools Produce Significant Achievement Gains

Contact: Jennifer de Vallance, (202) 484-4692

WASHINGTON, DC—February 27, 2013—A report released today by Mathematica Policy Research shows that Knowledge Is Power Program (KIPP) middle schools have significant and substantial positive impacts on student achievement in four core academic subjects: reading, math, science, and social studies. One of the report’s analyses confirms the positive impacts using a rigorous randomized experimental analysis that relies on the schools’ admissions lotteries to identify comparison students, thereby accounting for students’ prior achievement, as well as factors like student and parent motivation. Fact sheet.

Key findings on KIPP’s achievement gains include:

KIPP middle schools have positive and statistically significant impacts on student achievement across all years and all subject areas examined. In each of their four years of middle school, KIPP schools produced positive academic impacts on state standardized tests. Significant positive impacts are evident on average as well as for the majority of individual KIPP middle schools in the study.

The magnitude of KIPP’s achievement impacts is substantial. In each of the four subjects studied, KIPP schools produced achievement gains large enough to have a substantial impact on student outcomes:

Math: Three years after enrollment, the estimated impact of KIPP on math achievement is equivalent to moving a student from the 44th to the 58th percentile of the school district’s distribution. This represents 11 months of additional learning growth over and above what the student would have learned in three years without KIPP.

Reading: Three years after enrollment, the estimated impact in reading is equivalent to moving a student from the 46th to the 55th percentile, representing 8 months of additional learning growth over and above what the student would have learned in three years without KIPP.

Science: Three to four years after enrollment, the estimated impact in science is equivalent to moving a student from the 36th to the 49th percentile, representing 14 months of additional learning growth over and above what the student would have learned in that time without KIPP

Social Studies: Three to four years after enrollment, the estimated impact in social studies is equivalent to moving a student from the 39th to the 49th percentile, representing 11 months of additional learning growth over and above what the student would have learned in that time without KIPP.
The matched comparison design produces estimates of KIPP’s achievement impacts similar to estimates of the same impacts based on an experimental, lottery-based design. Researchers found that KIPP’s achievement gains are similar for the matched comparison design and the experimental lottery analysis.

KIPP’s gains are not the result of “teaching to the test.” For KIPP students in the lottery sample, researchers administered the TerraNova test—a nationally norm-referenced test—which students had not prepared for, and which carried no consequences for students or schools. The impacts shown in the TerraNova test were consistent with those shown in state tests.
Mathematica senior fellow and study director Philip Gleason said, “KIPP is making important strides to close achievement gaps for disadvantaged students. Findings from this large and comprehensive evaluation show that KIPP schools lead to educationally meaningful increases in student achievement, not just in basic reading and math, but in a broader set of subjects, including science and social studies.”

In addition to studying academic impacts, researchers also administered surveys to students and parents in the lottery group, to assess how KIPP affects behavior and attitudes toward school. The surveys showed that KIPP students complete up to 53 minutes more homework per night than they would have at non-KIPP schools, and that winning a KIPP lottery had a positive effect on both parents’ and students’ satisfaction with school. However, they also found that KIPP students reported no discernible increase in attitudes associated with success, and had an increased incidence of self-reported undesirable behaviors, including losing their temper, arguing with or lying to their parents, or giving their teachers a hard time.

The new report—the latest from Mathematica’s multi-year study of KIPP middle schools—is the most rigorous large-scale evaluation of KIPP charter schools to date. The report confirms and adds to the findings of the first Mathematica report on KIPP schools, released in 2010. The newly released 2013 report covers twice as many schools: 43 KIPP middle schools in 13 states and in the District of Columbia. In addition, the new report includes a broader range of student outcomes, examining not only state test results in reading and math, but also test scores in science and social studies; results on a nationally normed assessment that includes measures of higher-order thinking; and behaviors reported by students and parents.

The report also describes the population of students entering KIPP schools. Researchers found that students entering KIPP schools are similar to other students in their neighborhoods: overwhelmingly low achieving, low income, and nonwhite. Ninety-six percent are either black or Hispanic, and 83 percent are eligible for free or reduced-price school meals. Before enrolling in KIPP, typical students had lower achievement levels than both the average in the elementary school they attended and the average in the district as a whole. On the other hand, KIPP students are somewhat less likely than others in their elementary schools to have received special education services or to have limited English proficiency.

About Mathematica: Mathematica Policy Research, a nonpartisan research firm, provides a full range of research and data collection services, including program evaluation and policy research, survey design and data collection, research assessment and interpretation, and program performance/data management, to improve public well-being. Its clients include federal and state governments, foundations, and private-sector and international organizations. The employee-owned company, with offices in Princeton, N.J.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; Cambridge, Mass.; Chicago, Ill.; Oakland, Calif.; and Washington, D.C., has conducted some of the most important studies of education, disability, health care, family support, employment, nutrition, and early childhood policies and programs.

Julian Vasquez Heilg has started a series that follows the money.

Previous entries looked at Sandy Kress, the advocate for high-stakes testing and lobbyist for Pearson, and Teach for America.

In this entry, he takes KIPP to task for understating what it spends per pupil. He relies on public data. He calls on KIPP to be a “little more honest.”

A big foundation in Texas is creating a $50 million fund to open 145 new charters for 80,000 children in San Antonio. The city already has one-quarter of its students in charters. One of the chains likeliest to grow there are Great Hearts, BASIS, KIPP, AND IDEA.

It seems that the goal is to create a privatized system of schools in San Antonio, with whatever public schools remain enrolling the kids the charters don’t want.

A group of elected officials trekked to visit a KIPP Charter school in Arkansas and came home very impressed. They saw black children in an almost all-black school engaged in their studies, and they want to replicate what they saw in Arkansas.

In the news article, however, they said repeatedly that no such schools were needed in DeSoto County. They are needed somewhere else in Mississippi, clearly for black kids.

And this was in the article as well:

“Lt. Governor Tate Reeves organized the trip because he believes this type of school could help improve Mississippi education system.

“If it can happen in Helena, Arkansas it can happen right across the river in Clarksdale, Mississippi and all up and down the Mississippi delta and quite frankly throughout our state. And so that is the message we are trying to convey to the members of the legislature. That is the message we are trying to convey to the people of our state. Because that is a message that is worth fighting for,” Reeves said.

Roughly 1-thousand kids attend KIPP, with nearly all graduating and scoring higher on standardized tests.

Reeves used trip to try and build support for expanding the Mississippi’s charter school law to make it easier for schools like KIPP to open.

The school sounds like one of those miracle schools that we hear about so often. I asked Gary Rubinstein if this was truly a miracle school and he checked it out. It’s not. It has very high attrition and many students repeating ninth grade.

Sixty-nine students are in ninth grade, but only 23 in grade 12.

The school is 95% black.

Back in another era, we would also say that it is a segregated school, but these days no one cares about that.

A few more facts about the model that Mississippi Republicans are eager to replicate:

Algebra passing KIPP 50%, State 77%
Bio KIPP 45%, State 43%
Geometry KIPP 77%, State 73%
Literacy KIPP 64%, State 65%
http://normessasweb.uark.edu/schoolperformance/beta/Sdash/index/5440703

In HS, 85 AP exams were taken, but only 13 passed.

19 on ACT is about 40th percentile

http://normessasweb.uark.edu/schoolperformance/beta/src/index/5440703

Remediation rate is 54% which is above state average.

In the HS ‘gains’ index, they are categorized as a ‘level 1 – school in need of immediate improvement’

http://normessasweb.uark.edu/schoolperformance/beta/Sdash/index/5440703

As this story in the Wall Street Journal shows, over 1,000 public schools closed last year, involving some 280,000 students.

This is supposedly the result of competition. But it seems clear that in some districts, like DC, Chicago, and NYC, the leaders of the public schools are supporting the other team. How can you have competition when the home team has leaders cheering for and helping the other side?

Why doesn’t KIPP accept the KIPP Challenge and take over all of DC?

SCHOOLS RING CLOSING BELL

By STEPHANIE BANCHERO

WASHINGTON—At Davis Elementary in this city’s mostly poor southeast section, 178 students are spread out in a 69-year-old building meant to hold 450.

Three miles away, the new, $30 million KIPP charter school teems with 1,050 children. Toddlers crawl over a state-of-the-art jungle gym and older students fill brightly decorated classrooms. A waiting list holds 2,000 names.

Many students who live within the Davis boundaries instead attend the charter school, one of 125 nationwide run by KIPP, a nonprofit. The exodus helped land Davis on a list of 20 schools targeted for closure next school year.

Closing underused schools, however painful, will let the district shift resources to “improve the quality of education we provide to our students,” Schools Chancellor Kaya Henderson said at a recent city council hearing packed with parents, teachers and students pleading for schools to be kept open.

Similar scenes are playing out in places such as Tucson, Ariz., Chicago and Philadelphia, where school systems are rolling out plans to close underenrolled and underperforming facilities. The efforts are driven by a drop in the school-age population, the Obama administration’s push to shut poor-performing schools and competition from charters, the publicly funded schools run by independent groups.

During the 2010-11 school year, school districts nationwide closed 1,069 traditional public schools, uprooting nearly 280,000 students, according to data compiled for The Wall Street Journal by the National Center for Education Statistics, the primary federal entity for national school data. That was up from 717 closings affecting 193,000 students in 2000-01, according to the data, which don’t include specialized schools, such as those for special-education students.

Even charters aren’t immune. In 2010-11, 128 charter schools were closed, compared with 44 in 2000-01, the data show. This past week, the National Association of Charter School Authorizers, a nonprofit group that represents government and other entities that approve charter-school applications, called on its members to close hundreds of poor-performing charters and urged new state laws to improve accountability. The group said at least 900 of the nation’s 6,000 charters, which also receive private donations, post test scores that land them in the bottom 15% of all schools in their states.

“We did not start this movement to create more bad schools,” said Greg Richmond, president of the group. “We want smarter charter-school growth and stronger accountability.”

Proponents of school choice say closing low-performing and underenrolled campuses is a natural outgrowth of heathy competition, while many teacher unions argue that struggling schools often need more resources to fairly compete. Meanwhile, many parents fear that closures will mean students end up in schools that are farther away or worse academically.

Tubrook Livingston, who has a child at Davis Elementary and heads its Parent Teacher Association, said he recognizes the school is underenrolled and low-performing, but he wants it kept open. “Unless they have a better place for our kids…I don’t see any reason to close it,” he said.

In Chicago, rumors that the city intended to close as many as 100 schools laid the foundation for the two-week teachers strike in September and sparked rallies protesting the closings and prompted protests citywide. Facing a Saturday deadline, city officials lobbied state legislators last week to allow a delay in identifying schools targeted for closure. State lawmakers granted the extension and the governor signed the bill Friday. Chicago schools officials have said they will implement a five-year moratorium on closings after next year’s schools closings.

In Washington, enrollment in district-run schools has dropped to about 42,000 this year from about 61,000 in 2002, due partly to the city’s dwindling school-age population and the growing popularity of charter schools. About 40% of D.C. public-school students now attend charters.

Research is scant on the academic impact of school closings. But two studies—one in Chicago and one in an unnamed district in the Northeast—found that, in general, students displaced by closures do no better, and sometimes worse, in other traditional schools, in large part because they transfer to similarly low-performing campuses nearby.

Closing schools doesn’t necessarily yield a financial windfall, because teachers often are shuffled to other schools and vacant school buildings are tough to unload, according to a 2011 study by Pew Charitable Trusts’ Philadelphia Research Initiative. “There is nothing easy about closing schools and it is extremely difficult to find productive uses for the buildings,” said Emily Dowdall, a senior researcher at Pew.

Still, underused schools like Davis, which has students from preschool through fifth grade, can be expensive to operate. Davis Elementary spends about $13,225 a pupil, with about 32% going toward classroom teachers, and the rest funding such things as instructional aides, office staff and custodians. Nearby Langdon Elementary, with more than twice as many students, spends $9,900 a pupil, with 55% going to classroom teachers.

“We get that we are small and it’s not cost effective to run a small school, but we have a good thing going here and our students are making great progress,” said Davis’s principal, Maisha Riddlesprigger.

Since 2009, the portion of Davis students who tested proficient in reading doubled to 34%, while math proficiency jumped to 35% from 22%. At the nearby KIPP school, 59% are proficient in reading and 75% in math.

Nichole Young lives a few blocks from Davis but sends her 4-year-old son to KIPP. “I don’t have anything against Davis,” said Ms. Young, who teaches 12th grade English in a Maryland public school. “But we visited KIPP and observed the children in classes and they seemed so happy to be learning and that won me over.”

Write to Stephanie Banchero at stephanie.banchero@wsj.com

A version of this article appeared December 3, 2012, on page A3 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Schools Ring Closing Bell.

Gary Rubinstein was among the nation’s earliest Teach for Merica teachers. Unlike most TFA, however, he became a career teacher. He now teaches at Stuyvesant High School in New York City. This is a very interesting report on a visit he paid to a KIPP school. Be sure to read te comments.

Andy Smarick believes that public schools can’t be fixed or turned around. He thinks that the only way to solve their problems is to close them down and replace them with privately managed charters. Andy served on the board of a KIPP school, so he is confident that KIPP can do what no public school can do.

In a previous post, I called on Andy to join me in “the KIPP Challenge.” This is the challenge for KIPP to take over an entire low-performing district and show what it can do. Prove that it doesn’t skim the best students, show what happens when it takes all the kids, prove the critics wrong. Given Andy’s experience as a member of a KIPP board, I thought he should join me.

Now he says that the School Improvement Grants (SIG) are a vast waste of money. I agree with him again.

Billions have been spent with meager results. The Department of Education has boasted of double digit gains, but Anthony Cody showed the statistical game that the DOE was playing. Anthony warned last March that the DOE was “spinning the numbers,” and that the SIG program was not working.

Agreed!

I feel strongly that a decade from now, we will look back and realize that the billions spent on Race to the Top were a waste of money that diverted schools from their true mission of developing and educating citizens, not the best test-takers who can win a race for higher test scores.

Andy, lover of all things new, wants to see the SIG program replaced by a commitment only to new schools.

But Chicago and New York City have been doing that for years without much success. The New York Daily News reported recently that nearly 60% of the new schools opened by Mayor Bloomberg had lower passing rates than the “failing” schools they had replaced. Why do more of the same when it didn’t work? If most of the new schools do worse than the old schools, we will move backwards, not forwards.

So, my suggestion is that federal money go to build and strengthen communities as well as schools; that it be coordinated with social services and health services to make sure that children are fit and healthy; that it be spent to make sure that schools in every community have a full rich curriculum with experienced teachers; that it be used to make sure that every school serving poor communities has strong parental involvement and social workers. And that we honor our nation’s commitment to equality of educational opportunity.

I know Andy won’t agree with my prescriptions. But I don’t agree with privatizing education.

With a favorable rightwing privatizing climate in Texas and bipartisan support in Washington, a group of charters have proposed a bold plan to take over one fourth of all the students in San Antonio. The time is right for privatization on a grand scle.