Archives for category: Common Core

Politico’s crack reporter Stephanie Simon discovered a growing backlash among states against the presumption in the Common Core that all students are college-bound.

She writes:

“Florida students no longer need chemistry, physics or Algebra II to graduate from high school. Texas just scrapped its Algebra II requirement. And Washington state has dropped its foreign language mandate.

“A standards rebellion — or in the eyes of the opponents, the dumbing down of America — is sweeping red states and blue, promoted by both Republicans and Democrats. President Barack Obama has called for a rigorous college-prep curriculum for all students. States, however, are responding with defiance: They’re letting teens study welding instead of Spanish, take greenhouse management in place of physics and learn car repair instead of muddling over imaginary numbers.

“The backlash stems, in part, from anger over the Common Core, a set of standards that Obama has promoted as a way to guide students through a demanding college-prep curriculum from kindergarten through high school. But it’s more than that. It’s pushback against the idea that all students must be ready for college — even if they have no interest in going.

“Manufacturing associations, trade groups and farm lobbies have fueled the resentment at universal college prep, arguing that it’s elitist, that it demeans blue-collar workers — and, not incidentally, that it’s cutting off their pipeline of new workers.

“We need pipefitters and welders just as much as we need folks who want to pursue a four-year degree,” said Rebecca Park, legislative counsel for the Michigan Farm Bureau, which wants more vocational classes to count as science and math.”

Many people–especially policymakers and financiers who went to Ivy League colleges–would like to believe that all students are college-bound. But their beliefs are contradicted by reality when it turns out that a substantial number of youngsters would rather work than go to college, and that there are many jobs that pay well, don’t require college, and can’t be outsourced. Ideally, people should be able to get as much higher education as they want and need, but the biggest obstacle is the cost. It is easier to raise the bar higher and higher than to do something significant about lowering the cost of college. How about free community colleges(again), where people can get higher education without assuming unreasonable debt?

Mercedes Schneider and Peter Greene, both high school teachers, had different responses to NEA President Dennis Van Roekel’s acknowledgement that implementation of the Common Core standards has been highly problematic, er, disastrous.

Give Dennis credit for recognizing that things are going very badly.

Teachers are beginning to recognize that they are not prepared and that the boom will be lowered on their heads.

Mercedes thinks that the NEA sold its independence to Gates.

Peter G is thrilled that NEA recognizes that the standards themselves need a state-level rewrite, by teachers, not DC bureaucrats. That alone would be a huge improvement, and he welcomes Dennis’ turnabout.

Doug Noble is a member of Rochester’s Coalition for Justice in Education. He wrote this letter to the editor of the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle.
.

Editor:

The D&C Feb 11 editorial “Committed to Common Core” reveals a
remarkable willingness to swallow the Common Core Kool Aid
and to accuse of “posturing” its many critics, including parents’
groups, teachers and their unions, who have moved Regents and state leaders to action.

This long overdue resistance, though, is hardly “posturing.” These
critics, with counterparts across the country, have conducted “close
readings” of the curriculum and policy materials while documenting the
damage done to children and to schools. They have analyzed the
glaringly inappropriate pedagogy, researched the dubious corporate
history, and understood fully the premature, flawed implementation.

They could serve as a perfect role model of the very “critical thinking” the Common Core allegedly champions.

The D&C editorial explains that “systemic change is never easy,”
unmindful that the Common Core, rather than any kind of change, is
really more of the same.

Common Core has been in the works for decades. It is nothing but the
culmination of more than 25 years of a well financed, power-brokered
campaign orchestrated by opportunist politicians seeking a
standardized silver bullet for education and by corporate profiteers
seeking a national education market ripe for their ventures and wares.

These antidemocratic intrusions of standards, curricula, tests, and
management schemes have been distracting schools and educators from
authentic improvement for decades, with such labels as “America
2000,” “Goals 2000,” No Child Left Behind, “Race to the Top,” and now “Common Core,” all with the identical agenda.

The D&C editorial reminds us that “lost amid all this posturing are
New York’s students, including those in Rochester’s schools.” As if
all these concerned teachers and parents have somehow forgotten them.
As if enthusiastic, autonomous and unafraid teachers are somehow not
essential to helping them. And as if Common Core curriculum standards
will somehow address the grueling concentration of child poverty that
is the real source of poor student performance. No, the critics have
not lost sight of the students, as Common Core evangelists repeatedly
insinuate. On the other hand, to paraphrase Samuel Johnson, trumpeting students’ welfare while throwing them under the bus in the name of reform is the last refuge of education’s scoundrels.

Doug Noble
268 Brunswick St, Rochester, NY 14607

Another great column from Myra Blackmon in the Athens (Georgia) Banner-Herald, explains the education industry and its obsession with data.

She writes:

“Some folks believe that if you can’t quantify something, it isn’t worth bothering with. People in power are often so obsessed with the data, the numbers, and the profits they often lose sight of the people behind the information.

Such is the case with the massive educational “evaluation” being pushed by so-called reformers. Many of these high-level reformers — Bill Gates, Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others — know little or nothing about teaching and learning in our public schools. Bill Gates’ children attended Lakeside Academy in Seattle, where tuition approaches $30,000 a year. One of Michael Bloomberg’s daughters was featured in a documentary “Born Rich” about growing up with tremendous wealth.”

PS: the editors should note that Bill Gates put $200 million into the Common Core standards, not $200,000 (which would be chicken feed for Gates).

Governor Cuomo created a panel to review the flawed rollout of the Common Core. His panel is stacked with supporters of Common Core. The governor invited the public to offer suggestions. Here is one from Jeff Nichols, a parent of children in the New York City public schools and a professor at Queens College and the GraduateCenter of the City of New Yrk:

Professor Nichols writes:

The Common Core Implementation Panel has invited suggestions from the public. Here’s mine, submitted to them this morning.

* * *

My suggestion is very simple:

Withdraw from the Common Core.

No recommendation this panel can come up with will salvage the CCSS, for a very simple reason. Ever growing numbers of parents like me reject the entire concept of federally mandated standards. And when standards are tied to funding, that is a form of mandate.

I consider myself a liberal Democrat. I voted twice for Barack Obama. But I am as offended by the design and implementation of CCSS as the tea party Republicans who oppose all federal interventions in their lives.

Why? The CCSS are expensive, mediocre, redundant and were adopted without due democratic process. They are, in short, a boondoggle perpetrated on the public by politicians who are either ignorant of real educational needs or under the sway of private interests that stand to profit enormously from this initiative.

As a taxpayer, I want the state’s education dollars dedicated to measures that actually improve student learning. The Common Core standards are completely unproven and, judging from early results, ineptly designed — too demanding in early grades, not demanding enough in later ones. Moreover, they come twinned with a new wave of useless and phenomenally expensive standardized tests. My wife and I will opt our children out of all state tests at least until all of New York State has implemented universal pre-K and high quality day care for low-income working families, until every child has the opportunity to learn a musical instrument and has access to the kinds of libraries, gyms and other vital faculties that children who live in affluent communities take for granted.

Our position is not going to change because NYSED acknowledges some errors in its implementation of CCSS. We demand the return of control over curriculum and teaching methods to educators, parents and local communities. The state can feel free to issue recommendations for curriculum, but not the kinds of mandates that have been flowing from CCSS.

All my wife and I want is for our children’s teachers to have the same intellectual freedom to practice their profession according to their best judgment as that enjoyed teachers in the exclusive private schools attended by the children of Barack Obama, Arne Duncan and John King.

That was the reality in my own childhood, growing up attending locally controlled rural public schools in Indiana. In that not-so-distant time and place, high-stakes standardized tests didn’t exist prior to the SAT — and that was optional. Teachers assessed children; principals, fellow teachers and parents assessed teachers. It worked a heck of a lot better than the test-based, wasteful and counterproductive accountability systems of the NCLB era.

The Common Core, like all assaults on democracy, is the product of fear — in this case, that our children will fall behind in the global economy. But what those of us who are actually raising the next generation of Americans understand is that the way to address that fear is not to cede control of our children’s schools to David Coleman and Arne Duncan.

Americans of all political persuasions know that the only thing we should fear and fight against is the erosion of our democracy. A pluralistic, locally governed and free public school system is the bedrock of that democracy, and it will be restored — not by state and federal bureaucrats, but by families like mine.

A sage comment by a reader:

“The chief purpose of the Common Core standards –– one cited by the Common Core initiative, and repeatedly echoed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and Business Roundtable, and Arne Duncan and the like –– is that the standards are necessary to enable American students and the American nation “to compete successfully in the global economy.”

That’s demonstrably false.

American economic competitiveness is not tied to test scores; it is inextricably linked to stupid decisions made by politicians and corporate America.

When the U.S. dropped from 2nd to 4th in the 2010-11 World Economic Forum’s competitiveness rankings, four factors were cited by the WEF: (1) weak corporate auditing and reporting standards, (2) suspect corporate ethics, (3) big deficits (brought on by Wall Street’s financial implosion) and (4) unsustainable levels of debt.

More recently major factors cited by the WEF are a (1) lack of trust in politicians and the political process, with a lack of transparency in policy-making; (2) “a lack of macroeconomic stability” caused by decades of fiscal deficits and debt accrued as a result of boneheaded economic policies; (3) gross income inequities; and (4) political dysfunction.

The fact that the most ardent avid supporters of the Common Core are also
those most responsible for our nation’s economic problems is not very comforting.

Mercedes Schneider recently wrote an open letter to Bill Gates. She is angry that he will be the keynote speaker for the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Let’s face it: Bill Gates has never taught and most of what he knows about education is wrong.

Schneider calls on him to explain how teachers can hold him accountable for having the nerve to tell them how to teach.

She writes:

“Your money is philanthropic cocaine to the organizations accepting your dollars.

“Your millions appear to foster a quick addiction in which organizations bend their agendas to suit the stream of your continued millions– to the detriment of their constituents.

“It is time for you to be accountable, Bill. Toward this end, the best I have is to call you out on my free blog.

“In your 2014 NBPTS speech, break new ground by offering a plan for your own accountability regarding your education reform spending.

“Feel free to share your plan with Eli Broad and the Waltons.

“Perhaps you might form a philanthropic support group to help each other withdraw from the bored-billionaire addiction to purchasing democracy.”

Earlier, she participated in a debate in Louisiana about the Common Core standards. Two panelists favored Them. One joined her in opposition. She was the only experienced teacher in the debate. Actually, the only teacher.

Reading the claims, you do get the sense that advocates see CCSS as the very thing that will prepare all students for college and great careers and will lift up the state’s economy too. How they know this to be true is not clear.

Schneider mopped the floor against the advocates.

My favorite lines.

“As for business leader Barry Erwin, the other CCSS supporter on the February 4th panel, CCSS is the solution for filling those 21st-century jobs with qualified Louisiana graduates.

“It certainly sounds good– except that the Louisiana Workforce Commission (LWC) projects that in 2016, the top three available jobs in Louisiana will be cashier, retail sales, and waiter/waitress.

“The first job on the list requiring a bachelors degree for entry level is ranked eleven: elementary school teacher. What irony.”

Children with disabilities have many struggles to deal with. Public officials should do their best to remove the obstacles these children confront, not add to them.

This is a statement written by Bianca Tanis, a parent of a child with disabilities.

Here is an excerpt:

“As of Tuesday, 2/11, Members of the NYS Assembly completed interviews of both new and incumbent candidates for the 4 positions that are up for re-appointment on the NYS Board of Regents. In light of the failure of the Board of Regents to heed parent concerns, coupled with a Regents Task Force Report that is at best misinformed and at worst duplicitous, the legislature must elect new leadership to the Board. When the legislators vote to decide who will fill these 4 spots on March 11th, parents and educators will be watching.

“Parents of students with disabilities have been vocally opposed to not only the flawed implementation of the CCLS, but also the deep flaws within the standards themselves and the ways in which they promote poor instructional practice for special education students. One of the Regents up for reappointment is Christine Cea, the Regent from Staten Island who calls herself the “voice of disabilities.” You can watch her interview with members of the Assembly Education Committee here.

“There is little doubt that as a parent of a child with a disability and a researcher for the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities , Regent Cea has the best intentions. However, after watching her interview, it is difficult to believe that she is the most qualified person to represent the educational needs of students with disabilities in New York.

“Regent Cea side stepped questions and gave vague, general answers. When asked where in her opinion, special education is going and what direction it should take, Ms. Cea offered the less than insightful response, “We are seeing great strides in getting people independent and doing more and more.” When asked what she hopes to accomplish in her next term if elected, Regent Cea responded, “I moved very comfortably into the spot of being the disability voice and I just hope to do more…I hope to take this transition piece (transition to the CC) and make it into something special.” Special?

“Perhaps most disturbing was Regent Cea’s complete and utter lack of understanding of the ways in which the CCLS are impacting students with disabilities in the classroom.”

Tanis then reprints the interview.

David Greene asks a logical question: Does the New York Times know its left from its right?

This is a confused and confusing portrait of the vigorous, noisy, and numerous activists who are fighting Common Core and its testing and scripted modules in New York.

The article leaves out the parent and educator groups across the state: the BATs, the Long Island parent opt-out groups, Leonie Haimson’s Class size Matters, and many more.
.
There is a good quote from Carol Burris, but no mention of the fact that she speaks for about 40% of the state’s principals.

The Thomas B. Fordham Institute–beloved source of NY Times’ quotes–is described as a “public policy group” in DC, with no reference to the it pronounced ideological bent, their membership in ALEC, their receipt of Gates’ largesse to promote the Common Core.

This CAN’T be the newspaper of record.

New York parents, especially in the politically powerful suburbs of Long Island and Westchester-Putnam, are outraged by the failure of the New York Board of Regents to take more decisive steps to fix the Common Core.

They want a thorough review of the standards by New York practitioners, and not those picked by CC-loving Commissioner John King. They want a true moratorium on the CC testing until the standards are made developmentally appropriate. Some want to eliminate them and use New York’s existing standards.

The consensus seems to be that the Regents tried to pull the wool over the eyes of the public, but parents were not fooled by half-measures.