Trump despises the press and delights in insulting them. In his first term, he called the press “the enemy of the people,” a term usually associated with Joseph Stalin. He has continued to lash out at reporters who are not his lapdogs. He ridicules them, especially if they are female.
When it happens, other members of the press corps act as though nothing happened.
Why don’t they stand up for their colleagues? Why do they ignore Trump’s unprecedented bullying?
He needs them. He glories in their presence. They give him oxygen.
Why don’t they close their iPads, cell phones, and notebooks, and walk out en masse?
Walk out.
Here is Trump’s latest diatribe, directed of course at a female journalist.
The Washington Post reported:
The White House on Monday leveled a sharply personal attack against CNN reporter Kristen Holmes after she asked President Donald Trump a pointed question during a news conference, crossing a barrier rarely breached by politicians to invoke her children.
“Jon Ossoff said you’d rather travel with your aide Natalie Harp and build the ballroom than do your job as president,” Holmes said. “What is your response?”
Trump answered Holmes’s question with an insult to Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Georgia), whom he called a “Pee-wee Herman look-alike,” referring to the Paul Reubens character.
Then the White House’s “rapid response” account on X took up the altercation, posting a video clip of the exchange and assailing Holmes as a “disgraceful, humiliating embarrassment to her alleged profession.”
In a follow-up tweet, the account dipped into a more personal line of attack: “Someday, your children will come across your disgusting and inhumane question,” the White House wrote. “They will be sickened and embarrassed to have a parent be so callous and vindictive. It’s quite troubling.”
The White House did not respond to a request for comment about its social media posts.
Trump’s personal attacks on journalists have been a defining feature of his combative approach to the press. Though he has criticized reporters throughout his political career, his critiques of women journalists, particularly those representing CNN, have grown more heated in recent months. And the administration has increasingly used official White House social media accounts to escalate what might once have been spur-of-the-moment exchanges.
Most recently, at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association dinner in July, Trump said that CNN anchor and Chief White House Correspondent Kaitlan Collins should “just smile” — a misogynistic trope — and likened her appearance to that of Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender activist villainized in conservative circles.
He followed up by posting an edited image imposing Collins’s likeness on an image of Mulvaney, which was later shared by an official White House account.
Trump’s critique of Holmes, a senior White House correspondent, continued during the news conference.
At another point, the president shushed her: “Quiet. Quiet. Quiet. You’re very disrespectful in front of this young man, okay? Don’t you find her disrespectful? He understands. Quiet. Who are you with?”
“I’m with CNN,” Holmes replied.
“Fake news. You’re fake news. You’re loud. You’re a loud, boisterous person. You’re fake news,” Trump said. “Be quiet, be quiet, be quiet. You’re a fake reporter, and you report fake news.”
CNN, in a statement, defended Holmes, calling her “one of the most respected and accomplished journalists covering the White House” and said it rejects the attacks “in the strongest possible terms.”
“This afternoon, she did her job and asked the President of the United States a tough, relevant, and newsworthy question on behalf of the American people,” a CNN spokesperson wrote in a statement. “Public officials are free to challenge reporting they disagree with, but personal attacks on journalists for asking questions are beneath the office and inconsistent with the principles of a free press.”
Holmes’s colleagues on CNN’s White House team rushed to her defense. “What a horrible to thing to say. Kristen is an incredible reporter, person and, above all, mother,” White House correspondent Alayna Treene wrote on X. “I don’t understand such a reaction to a journalist asking the president for his response to something a Democratic senator has leveled against him.”
“Kristen is an excellent reporter who asked a good question, to which the president gave a fulsome answer,” Betsy Klein, a senior White House reporter, wrote. “You know what’s disgusting and inhumane? Bringing her perfect children into this.”

The stories should read:
Trump is silent on Epstein.
Trump is silent on Iran.
Trump is silent on the expansion of the deficit
LikeLike
And Trump blames whatever goes wrong on Biden.
LikeLike
One reason to stay in the room. Is to break a story like this one.
And maybe eventually in some distant day.
Flood the Press Room Briefing with follow-up questions.
MS NOW exclusively reports that a Department of Justice whistleblower is telling Congress the Trump administration predetermined the outcomes of its antisemitism investigations into Harvard, Columbia and Brown University. MS NOW Justice and Intelligence Reporter Ken Dilanian joins Stephanie Ruhle to share more details. – Aired on 08/18/2026.
LikeLike
It’s rich that the Trump administration is investigating anti-Semitism at major universities when in reality it encourages bigotry of all kinds and all but dismantled the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. Its leader has led litigation against civil rights for many years. The Ed Dept’s Office for Civil Rights was transferred to the malevolent Civil Rights Division.
LikeLike
We know there are “good people” on both sides, right? Like Charlottesville.
LikeLike
But your ‘investigation’ into antisemitism was fake, a pre-baked frame-up operation thoroughly political in nature. Before an actual investigation took place and regardless of what you actually found, the whole project was designed to harass professors and administrators at major universities, to curtail their freedom of speech and academic freedom, and to strip targeted institutions of hundreds of millions of dollars in grants that they had already been awarded on the merits of their applications.” Jamie Raskin
“Hundreds of millions of dollars were suspended from these universities prior to the completion of Title VI investigations and the investigative team’s conclusions were frequently disregarded,” the complaint says.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is no need to cover Trump at these appearances. I agree the press should all walk out and not return; the lack of the coverage he covets would (not literally) kill him.
“Access journalism” is the reason they permit this degradation.
LikeLike
On a professional level, the press needs him.
On a psychic level, he needs the press to stir his Vampire blood
LikeLike
His Vampire Blood! Diane, tell us how you really feel!
I understand the press’ obligation to report on the president, but these press confabs have devolved into a display of Trump’s vileness. Send one or two people, not a gaggle of folks shouting questions into the void that is Trump’s ears.
LikeLike
The void is between his ears!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is nearly always women. His administration fires women. His “theatre boy” characterisation of Jon Osoff is an attempt to feminize him.
LikeLike