After horrible events, like political assassination or the explosion of a space vehicle, the President typically speaks to the nation and expresses grief and calls for national unity, reminding us that we are all Americans and we must help one another. I vividly recall Ronald Reagan’s talk to the nation after the space shuttle exploded, killing everyone, including Christa McAuliffe, who was going to be the first teacher in space.
No President has ever been as divisive as Trump. With no evidence at hand, he blamed Democrats and “radical left lunatics” for the killing of Charlie Kirk.
Robert Reich wrote the commentary before the alleged killer’s name was known. We now know that Tyler Robinson was not a registered Democrat. He had not voted in the last two elections, according to local officials. He is white, his family are Republicans, he is apparently straight, he was enrolled in a program to become an electrician, he grew up with guns, his father was in law enforcement. He was a regular 22-year-old in a law-abiding family in a deep Red state.
Only Tyler–if he is the perpetrator– can explain his motives.
Yet our President was eager to blame the other political party. He is shameless.
Reich wrote:
The reaction by Trump to the horrendous assassination of Charlie Kirk has been as irresponsible as anything Trump has done to date to divide our nation.
When bad things happen, presidents traditionally use the highest office in the land to calm and reassure the public. The best of our presidents appeal to the better angels of our nature, asking that we harbor “malice toward none.”
Trump consistently appeals to the worst of our demons, as he did Wednesday night after the shooting when he said:
“For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we’re seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now.”
I don’t know at this writing who was responsible for Kirk’s death, and Trump certainly didn’t know when he made these remarks Wednesday night. But for Trump to blame the “radical left” — a term he often uses to describe the whole Democratic Party — is an unconscionable provocation that further polarizes Americans at a time when we badly need to come together.
It’s also a vehicle for silencing criticism of Trump’s own authoritarianism, advancing the presumption that if you criticize someone for being an authoritarian, or the member of an authoritarian political movement, you’re a terrorist who’s inciting murder.
Trump continued:
“My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law-enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.”
It’s unclear what Trump is calling for here, but it sounds as if he may use the Kirk assassination as a pretext for unleashing the FBI and other federal law enforcement on every organization that could possibly be seen as contributing to the “radical left.” This becomes clearer from what he said next:
“From the attack on my life in Butler, Pennsylvania, last year, which killed a husband and father, to the attacks on ICE agents, to the vicious murder of a health-care executive in the streets of New York, to the shooting of House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and three others, radical-left political violence has hurt too many innocent people and taken too many lives.”
Trump is attributing America’s rising tide of political violence to the “radical left,” ignoring the significant if not larger amount of political violence perpetrated by Trump supporters on the far-right.
The latter includes the shootings of two Minnesota Democratic legislators at their home earlier this summer, the attempted assassination of Pennsylvania’s Democratic governor Josh Shapiro in April, the series of shootings at the homes of four Democratic elected officials in New Mexico in 2022, the attempted kidnapping of Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020, the attempted pipe bombings at the homes of Barack Obama and Joe Biden in 2018, and the attack on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband in 2022.
Trump’s list of so-called “radical-left” violence included attacks on ICE agents — which did not involve gunfire — but conveniently failed to mention the shooting a month ago at CDC headquarters, in which a man protesting Covid-19 vaccines fired more than 180 shots at the building and killed a police officer.
Nor, obviously, did Trump include the violence he himself incited at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, by over 1,500 followers who received prison terms — all of whom Trump subsequently pardoned.
There is no excuse for political violence in America. Nor is there any excuse for provoking even more of it by blaming it on one side or the other.
And no excuse for a president of the United States using a heinous killing as an occasion to treat his political opponents as accomplices to murder and threatening to use the full power of the government to attack them.
We have had enough violence, enough carnage, enough blame. We must do whatever we can to reduce the anger and hate that are consuming and destroying so much of this nation.
It is time for all of us, including a president, to take some responsibility.

Kirk’s view of women clearly stated in a comment he addressed to Taylor Swift on her announcement of her engagement to Travis Kelce:
“Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, August 26, 2025
Kirk comments on Civil Rights and race:
“We made a huge mistake when we passed the civil rights act in the 1960s” — at America Fest, December 2023.
“If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, January 23, 2024
“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.” – The Charlie Kirk Show, May 19, 2023
“If I’m dealing with somebody in customer service who’s a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?” – The Charlie Kirk Show, January 3, 2024
“Michelle Obama and [U.S. Representative] Sheila Jackson Lee and [U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Ketanji Brown Jackson…You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to be taken somewhat seriously.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, July 13, 2023
“The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, March 20, 2024
“Islam is not compatible with western civilization.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, June 24, 2025
“Islam is the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America.” — Charlie Kirk post on X September 8, 2025
“There is no separation of church and state. It’s a fabrication, it’s a fiction, it’s not in the constitution. It’s made up by secular humanists.” — The Charlie Kirk Show, July 6, 2022 (But in fact, in the First Amendment, the Constitution clearly forbids religion in government, and Founding Father James Madison, who our nation honors with the title “Father of the Constitution” made it clear why he and the other Founding Fathers who wrote the Constitution very deliberately left out any mention of God, let alone of Jesus, in the Constitution; here is what The Father of our Constitution declared: “The religion of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man. [Government] MUST NOT PREFER ONE RELIGION OVER ANOTHER OR PROMOTE ANY RELIGION OVER NONBELIEF.”
LikeLiked by 4 people
You can count on Trump to always throw gasoline onto any fire he comes across; that is just one of his many disgraceful personal habits. But your side of the political spectrum – the far Left – has many people who are cheering this murder. Here is one more example why so many parents would love another option to traditional public schools for their kids. This repulsive teacher’s mindset in very common among the current crop of teachers. What he did was 100% intentional, deserving of no forgiveness, a horrible example for young people. You will, of course, defend him as will his union.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The link for the previos comment:
https://www.wmtv15news.com/2025/09/12/school-art-teacher-placed-leave-facebook-post-about-charlie-kirks-death/?fbclid=IwY2xjawMxVBBleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETE1d3Ruc1JuNGkydnVSdVY1AR5esD9hAL3DHnBStF94_W-xE8aPasIsT4Zi0Gi8c6uPddnZYdGr_QFgHiwdxw_aem_z9Nff36dN2l6rWlp2fApZQ
LikeLike
No one on this blog celebrated Kirk’s murder. No one. I am horrified by political violence of any kind. I believe in discussion and debate, not bullets and guns.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“You will, of course, defend him”
A bizarre statement, totally disconnected from reality
LikeLiked by 1 person
Notice that she does not criticize that Iowa teacher for celebrating premeditated murder committed for political reasons. Silence is complicity.
LikeLike
Ed Burke, did you condemn Charlie Kirk for celebrating the right wing Republican man who tried to kill Nancy Pelosi and only managed to attempt to murder Pelosi’s spouse instead? Did this teacher say of the murder “Why has he not been bailed out?” “By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out.”
The person who stated those words wasn’t Diane Ravitch, or the teacher you criticize. Diane Ravitch condemns violence on all sides. Do you? Were you calling for the flags to be lowered to half staff and statues erected to honor a Minnesota state legislator and her husband and the other Dems gunned down in their homes by a right wing Dem hater? That legislator never condoned violence against anyone either.
It’s a shame that alt right Nick Fuentes and Laura Loomer had – in the weeks before the assassination – been spewing nasty attacks about Charlie Kirk being a sell-out and opportunist for flip flopping on the Epstein file and being too pro-Israel.
It’s terrible that a likely mentally ill groyper raised in a Republican gun-loving household who dressed up in alt right costumes decided to kill Charlie Kirk.
Stop spewing hate, please. Be better than that. Be like Diane, not like Nick Fuentes, Laura Loomer, who demonized Charlie Kirk.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Well said
LikeLike
Intended for Ed Burke, but also applies to Ricky Lake.
Calling people who killed and maimed Capitol police officers “heroes” and pardoning their crimes should also be condemned. I hope you will do so.
LikeLike
Ed,
I’m a regular contributor to this blog and have been for decades. I’m also a retired teacher, still affiliated with the UFT…the largest single teachers union in the USA, located in one of (if not THE) most liberal cities in this country.
I am a registered Democrat who listens to all sides before forming my opinions. I’ll even vote Republican if the candidate seems like a better fit. Phil Scott, governor of Vermont, comes to mind. I spend a lot of time in that state. He’s awesome. He would get my vote.
I am not Far Left. And I don’t celebrate the death of Charlie Kirk.
My daughter is teaching American Government and Economics to seniors at an excellent high school in a very liberal leaning neighborhood in NYC. Last year and now this one, just started. She is further left than I, but you should see her lesson plans. Completely factual, extremely well researched, and totally unbiased. When asked for opinions by her students, she tells them that her job is to put forth the facts and let them judge their impacts, themselves. Period.
She is a Progressive. She is not a Far Left lunatic. And she is not celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Blanket statements such as the ones you are putting forth are indicative of an ever widening divide, here in this nation.
Bob
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh for pity’s sake, here we go again with the concern trolls peddling the usual nonsense. So one teacher in Iowa makes an inappropriate blurb on a social media site. It’s not exactly national news, I was not aware of it because it was not reported in the news in the New York metro area, that I am aware of or I missed it.
The teacher was punished and put on leave.
Quote from the article:
One of Kargol’s close friends says the beloved art teacher deserves a second chance.
“Matt shouldn’t have posted that, but he’s human and he makes mistakes. And if you look at his record through time as a friend and community member, we should take a little time and try to figure out that if we did something that was not the smartest thing in the world, would we want to be extended the same grace?” Jane Ryder said. End quote
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Each of us must turn inward and destroy in himself all that he thinks he ought to destroy in others.”
Etty Hillesum
LikeLiked by 3 people
If you don’t know Etty Hillesum, I recommend her writings.
LikeLike
interesting lady. Thanks
LikeLike
When Trump was asked what would heal this country, his response spoke volumes. Instead of trying to encourage peace and unity, he said, “I couldn’t care less.” He persisted in blaming the “radical left” for the divide, even though the suspect in Utah had nothing to do with liberal beliefs.
LikeLiked by 2 people
He’s seeking power and revenge.
The full quote is even more concerning, retired teacher:
“I’ll tell you something that’s going to get me in trouble, but I couldn’t care less. The radicals on the right oftentimes are radical because they don’t want to see crime. They’re saying, ‘We don’t want these people coming in. We don’t want you burning our shopping centers. We don’t want you shooting our people in the middle of the street. The radicals on the left are the problem.”
As with the insurrectionists who he pardoned…DJT is signaling an opening for more violence from the right wing extremists.
Chaos creates a void. He wants to fill this void with his agenda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree. He is stoking the flames of hate and division. Likewise, Musk is trying to make a martyr of Iryna Zarutska’s death by funding art installations of her face on buildings. What happened to this young woman was horrific! Musk’s not so subliminal message, I think, is to provoke the white nationalists because this poor woman was killed by a deranged Black man. The right is determined to incite violence, and no president should be actively involved in igniting the fire.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, his admission that he doesn’t care speaks VOLUMES about who he is and what he really thinks of this country and his job –which most clear-headed people have known for many years. But, sadly, what a long, lonely uphill battle to keep our democracy this is going to be, with a leader who admittedly could not care less about anyone but himself!
LikeLike
This is a summary of the National Institute of Justice’s 2024 study of ideologically motivated homocides in the US.
Who’s caused most deaths? NIJ’s Jan. 4, 2024 summary of DOJ-funded research finds that since 1990 far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists—227 events causing 520+ deaths vs. 42 events causing 78 deaths for far-left.
How DHS characterizes today’s threat: DHS’s Homeland Threat Assessment says the domestic violent extremist (DVE) threat remains high, driven mainly by lone offenders/small cells motivated by racial/ethnic hatred, anti-government grievances, and current events (e.g., elections, Israel-Hamas war).
Which strand is most dangerous? DHS has explicitly assessed that white-supremacist DVEs are the most persistent and lethal DVE threat in the U.S. (language used in the 2020 HTA) and continues to highlight racially/ethnically motivated DVEs in later assessments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
David,
I recall reading that Pam Bondi’s DOJ disbanded the Department’s Domestic Threat Assessment program. This bunch does not like exposing rightwing domestic terrorism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, here is the story. Bondi eliminated the agency that tracks Domestic Terrorists.
https://open.substack.com/pub/spytalk/p/exclusive-justice-department-erases?r=rls8&utm_medium=ios
LikeLiked by 1 person
On an unrelated note, I think that a lot of folks here would appreciate this brilliant expose of ChatGPT by my friend, the brilliant and learned Diana Senechal:
Tiptoe (or, messing with ChatGPT) | Take Away the Takeaway
LikeLike
Is the phenomenon that is Trump a sign that we have entered the era of kakistocracy, of devolution of the human species into drooling idiots who couldn’t tell “Tiptoe,” above, from “Dover Beach”?
LikeLike
Has anyone else noticed, lately, an explosion online of purported news stories that are mostly or entirely fabricated? I suspect that this phenomenon is related to a) the model provided by the falsehoods that spew from the sort-of-mouth-shaped hole in Donald Trump’s face b) the ubiquity of AI-generated falsehoods (misleadingly given the technical name “hallucinations,” b) the credulity with which both of those are accepted, and c) the monetary value of click-throughs.
I live in Florida, and a truly shocking number of the people I meet believe that the government is secretly poisoning citizens with chemtrails from airplanes, that the moon landing was filmed on a stage set, that the Covid vaccines contained microchips, that the sky is a dome over the Earth with stars stuck in it like raisins in a pudding, and other such nonsense. Social media–TikTok, Youtube, Instagram, X, Truth Social, etc.–and supposed news sources like Fox and OAN, are serving up increasing numbers of utter fabrications, and because these fabrications are sensational and ubiquitous, they get more clicks and sharing than do actual news stories, espcially from young people, who are more likely to be surfing TikTok and Youtube than PBS or CNN.
All this is alarming. We seem to be entering a post-truth world filled with uninformed people whose profound ignorance is equaled only by their certainty. Probably 40 percent of the video links that I see online these days are to false stories, presented as true, on a par with the “Unborn Baby Sings like Elvis” stories that used to appear in the World News and National Enquirer. Are others here having a similar experience?
LikeLike
Yikes. Some typos, above. My numbers are off, and I left out an end parend. Sorry.
LikeLike
I once asked a student who was very into conspiracy theories what it was inside himself that led him to believe stories like this. I think the question shocked him a bit but hopefully led to some self reflection.
LikeLike
Also, Bob, I thought this might interest you.
https://loc.closertotruth.com/map
LikeLike
“Post truth world!” Even mainstream media are sometimes guilty of failing to do their due diligence as they reiterate lies and misinformation from dubious sources.
LikeLike
Part of my college (student) career was spent at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Beginning of the ’70s.
Of course, there was more than just school study, hours in the practice rooms, and performances. The social life had it’s interesting moments.
Case in point: at one large party I met the Head of the Intergalactic Space Council. He was introduced to me by one of his admirers. I laughed and told him I was writing his paychecks.
They were serious. Highly insulted, they walked away from me. Others at the gathering avoided me that night. I’d insulted their leader.
Then there were the people who chose eating grass as a nutritious and inexpensive substitute to other greens. Saw some on the great lawn on campus. Grazing away. The emergency rooms were busy for a while on that one.
And of course there was the end of the world that never happened (but stay tuned), among other pedestrian experiences.
Jim Jones. Charles Manson. Etc…
What we’re seeing now isn’t a new phenom. It’s just that it’s times 1000, here in our information/disinformation age.
I agree with you about where so much of this delusional but successful propaganda is coming from, Bob. It’s incredibly disturbing. I’d add to that list the successful lobbying that ended up ridding the internet of the burdensome cost of fact checking. Now anyone can spew anything they want, as often as they want, for as long as they want. On multiple platforms. They’re bound to find a captive audience, considering the sheer number of worldwide viewers.
Add the tried and true “word of mouth” and it’s off to the races.
LikeLike