The Trump administration has announced plans to review the contents of exhibitions at several Smithsonian institutions. Trump has made clear that he wants all exhibits purged of negative or unpatriotic content. He wants exhibits to show only the positive aspects of American history. This is called censorship. When Trump is gone, the full story of American history will be restored the good, the inspiring but also the dark episodes where people were treated unfairly.
The Washington Post reported::
The White House will launch a sweeping review of Smithsonian exhibitions, collections and operations ahead of America’s 250th-birthday celebrations next year — the first time the Trump administration has detailed steps to scrutinize the institution, which officials say should reflect the president’s call to restore “truth and sanity” to American history.
The vetting process would include reviewing public-facing and online content, curatorial processes and guidelines, exhibition planning and collection use, according to a letter sent to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III on Tuesday and signed by White House senior associate Lindsey Halligan, Domestic Policy Council Director Vince Hale and White House Office of Management and Budget chief Russell Vought.
A White House official confirmed the plan, which was posted on the White House website Tuesday and first reported by the Wall Street Journal.
“The Smithsonian’s work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history,” a Smithsonian spokesperson said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. “We are reviewing the letter with this commitment in mind and will continue to collaborate constructively with the White House, Congress, and our governing Board of Regents.”
The institution already planned its own content review, ordered by the Smithsonian’s Board of Regents in June amid pressure from President Donald Trump. The regents instructed Bunch “to ensure unbiased content” across the institution and report back on “any needed personnel changes.”
The board at that time affirmed Bunch’s authority amid a high-stakes standoff between the White House and Kim Sajet, whom Trump had attempted to fire as director of the National Portrait Gallery. Sajet later resigned, saying her presence had become a distraction from the Smithsonian’s mission.
It is not immediately clear whether the White House’s action will supersede the Smithsonian’s review.
The letter states that the initial review will focus on eight museums: the National Museum of American History, the National Museum of Natural History, the National Museum of African American History and Culture, the National Museum of the American Indian, the National Air and Space Museum, the Smithsonian American Art Museum, the National Portrait Gallery and the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden.
To begin the process, officials requested that the museums provide information within 30 days concerning 250th-anniversary programming, current and future exhibition content, and other material.
The White House added that museums were expected to start making changes within 120 days.
“Museums should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions across placards, wall didactics, digital displays, and other public-facing materials,” the letter read.
Since returning to office in January, Trump has moved quickly to overhaul the country’s most prominent arts and cultural institutions. His focus on the Smithsonian has stoked concerns about political interference at the institution, which is not a traditional government agency and is historically considered nonpartisan.
In July, painter Amy Sherald withdrew her upcoming exhibition “American Sublime” from the National Portrait Gallery, citing concerns that the museum discussed removing from the show her painting of a transgender woman posing as the Statue of Liberty. (The Smithsonian said it discussed pairing the work with a video, not removing it.)
That same month, The Washington Post reported that a temporary placard containing references to Trump had been removed from an impeachment exhibit at the National Museum of American History as part of the Smithsonian content review. The museum later updated the display to restore context about Trump’s impeachments following swift outcry from members of the public and several Democratic leaders.
In March, Trump signed an executive order to eliminate “divisive narratives” across the Smithsonian museums and “restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.”
The order, titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” directs Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to remove “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian Institution, including its museums, education and research centers and the National Zoo.

New Cabinet-level position to be created, Secy of Governmental Cosmetics.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Idea For A PATRIOTIC Exhibit!
Southern Enslaved Human Beings lived mostly on plantations or in city based prisons. The prisons were horrible.
They rented slaves and kept slaves that could not be rented into tight confines where most died because of the no-work, no food policy.
Union soldiers would raid these prisons because they could saves thousands or tens of thousands of lives if they moved quickly. The southern operators would light charcoal braziers to smudge the slaves as a means of keeping them out of Union hands, so Union forces grew adept at rushing to their rescue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I bet that would be a hit with the MAGA neofascists.
LikeLike
I grew up in San Antonio, Texas, and like most kids there, I learned about the Battle of the Alamo. But I was never taught that many of the Texians were fighting to preserve slavery. I wasn’t told about the darker history of the Texas Rangers, or how so many Mexicans—whose families had lived in the region for generations—became second-class citizens and lost their land after the border crossed them. We were taught to revere the Alamo, and I’m angry that the uglier truths were erased.
It makes me wonder if the deep, almost unquestioning patriotism so many Americans feel is less a virtue and more a sickness—one that blinds people to reality. How can a country make amends for its past if it refuses to acknowledge it? I was stunned to see that some of my Mexican American peers from San Antonio grew up to be staunch Trump supporters. I suspect the same sanitized history that shaped my generation helped pave the way for his rise. Many were unwilling to let go of the comforting myths we were sold.
So when I hear that Trump wants to police history at the Smithsonian, it makes perfect sense. He’s attempting to restore the false history of previous generations so his supporters can feel better about themselves as Americans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps I’m being politically un-PC here. But I often have read that many Mexican-Americans of a previous generation who successfully made their tortuous way to naturalization have little sympathy for undocumented Mexican immigrants, and favor strong border control. And passed the attitude on to their kids.
We also can surmise that many Latino immigrants of this or previous generations have more experience with living under dictatorship than we do. Some will be sensitive to signs of encroaching authoritarianism, and will fight it. Many, OTOH, may have more tolerance for a stronger degree of govtl control. Depends no doubt on where they emigrated from, & their personal experience. I know older millennial Argentinians, e.g., who remember the last dictatorship & its aftermath from early childhood— with fear. They are quite alert to the encroachments of Milei admin; many are despondent & anxious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No “divisive narratives” allowed? Sometimes the truth is divisive. The Trump-Heritage-Project 2025 wants a narrative that is not true, but white-washed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That phrase caught my eye, too. It reminded me of so many anti-public-school (mostly Southern) states’ wording in their laws/ regs promulgated since 2020 dictating curriculum/ pedagogy. Leaving it up to state politicians how to define “divisive topics”—oblivious to the value of debating “divisive topics” as a means to teaching “critical thinking,” (to which they also disingenuously tip their hats).
Nanny-state crap, now come to the general public via govt control over Smithsonian Institute exhibits—not to mention Trump admin efforts to control curriculum of private & public institutions of higher ed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascism may be identified with exactly this sort of behavior. Legitimate government, never perfect, does not need to fear the truth in all its ugliness. Fascism, Stalinism, and other variations on monarchy in our modern times requires that the public buy into mythologies.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Original Star Trek episode that deals with a planet trying to make Nazism work but failing to do so is “Patterns of Force,” first aired on NBC in 1968. “In this episode, the crew of the USS Enterprise encounters a planet dominated by a regime inspired by Nazi Germany, led by a character named John Gill, who advocates for the efficiency of Nazism. The episode explores themes of fascism and the consequences of such ideologies, making it a significant and controversial entry in the Star Trek series.”
LikeLike
Almost every day it’s a new outrage from the Trump misadministration, now this. Only good news is allowed in Trumplandia and even history must be beaten and pummeled into shape so that it pleases glorious leader. Good grief, 3 more years of this garbage.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It has been a regular fire-hose from day #1. Clearly designed to wear down opponents into exhausted submission. Thank God for states, U’s, et al orgs with the fortitude and perseverance reqd to keep on suing Trump admin for every breach of norms, regs, laws, Constitution. I expect no less of the Smithsonian. No doubt Trump will hold the 50% fed govt contribution to the Museums—mostly appropriated by Congress– over their heads as leverage if they do not kowtow to his demands. Sadly, by the time any such suit wends its way thro the courts, the 250th anniversary will have come and gone.
LikeLike
Cleaning up the wreckage when this bunch are gone will take up a lot of time.
LikeLiked by 1 person