Republicans have wanted to gut the National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities for many years. In the past, they targeted the National Endowment for the Arts by focusing on artists whose work offended them. Somehow the Endowments managed to survive. But not this year. Elon Musk’s DOGS eliminated their funding. One victim of the cuts was National History Day, a competition that encourages the study of history.
Allison Dentzel of MSNBC reported:
This week, thousands of students traveled to the University of Maryland for the annual National History Day contest. However, this year’s competition celebrating America’s history almost didn’t happen after the Trump administration abruptly gutted the organizing nonprofit’s funding in April.
The organization received termination letters for its four-year grant totaling $650,000.
For more than 50 years, students at middle and high schools across the country attempt to qualify for the competition by submitting a historical research project based on that year’s theme. Students can write papers, prepare exhibits or performances, produce documentaries or create a website. After qualifying at the local and state levels, contestants are invited to take part in the national competition in College Park, Maryland.
But in April, the event was put in jeopardy after the Department of Government Efficiency terminated more than 1,000 National Endowment for the Humanities grants, including money for National History Day. The organization received termination letters for its four-year grant totaling $650,000, USA Today reported.
Without the government’s assistance and the competition just weeks away, the executive director of National History Day turned to social media. “We need your help,” Cathy Gorn said in a video posted to Instagram in early April. “We need to raise in the next few months about $132,000 to make History Day happen in June.”
Gorn’s public plea worked: NHD raised the money it needed, and about 3,000 students were able to present their projects on this year’s timely theme, “Rights and Responsibilities in History.”
“They are very in tune to what’s happening in the world, and they’re concerned, and they want to know more,” Gorn told USA Today. “And they’re drawn naturally to topics of fairness. So you’ll see a lot of civil rights, human rights, justice-type of topics here, but that’s so natural for a young person to kind of gravitate in that direction.”
While this year’s competition survived, the future of National History Day remains uncertain.
“Everybody is here, but I don’t know what next year is going to look like,” Gorn told USA Today. “It’ll be a horrible, horrible shame for kids and teachers not to be able to participate.”
Even though the fate of the 2026 competition is up in the air, NHD has selected its theme: “Revolution, Reaction, Reform in History.”

Great to know that the public has stepped up where Trump’s policies have once again failed to support a meaningful and important program. Especially affirming knowing that the support comes from a younger cohort. Let’s hope this positive outcome will also be reflected in tomorrow’s crucial demonstration of support for democracy! 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am reminded of Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451” where books are banned and burned because they are viewed as dangerous and disruptive to a society that values conformity and superficial happiness. History and universities are a threat to fascists that suppress free thought and legitimate knowledge. Trump wants us to be as ignorant as he is so we will buy into his bias, scapegoating and blaming “the other.” Division keeps us fighting with one another, and that is why Trump refused to accept the bipartisan bill on the border. Minds full of cotton candy will not notice he and his cronies are stealing our collective future.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The 24/7 hysteria on this blog continues apace. . At most 000001% of the public cares about this issue. Those of us who actually value serious history can read it on our own as I have done for 40+ years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barry,
I care about the issue.
I care to support the public funding of the arts and humanities.
I care about honoring the high school students who love history and become deeply engaged enough to want to participate in national History Day.
If you are not interested, don’t read it.
It’s my blog, and I post what interests me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barry: the 24/7 head in the sand seems to have taken over a lot of the nation as well. I too have been reading history for 40+ years, and I do not know of anyone who has been reading serious history during this period that is not taking the temperature of the body politic with a worried look. Of course, many people define serious history as history that justifies their own world view, no matter how objectionable that view might be.
LikeLike
Roy,
I agree that many people – especially including you and Diane Ravitch – define serious history as history that justifies their own worldview. Her absurd admiration for the 1619 Project shows that she is no longer a serious historian, just a far Left tribalist.
LikeLike
Barry: Here is an interesting personal story about the 1619 project. When it came out, I was crazy with work and could not read it. Somewhat later, I found time to peruse it while we were at the library got a few minutes. Turning randomly to a portion of it, I found reference to the relationship between the plantation mistress and the slaves who worked with her. I found this familiar and looked at the footnote. Turns out she had used an article written by my old history professor who taught the course in Old South I took at the University. Her article had been published in the Journal of American History during the 80s. She was long since passed, and I reflected at the time that she would have been as amused as I was that this book should be controversial
LikeLike
Roy,
It sounds like we are both unhinged leftists who see something wrong in our nation’s treatment of race and racism.
I read The 1619 Project when it was published. I have studied Black History in depth and I thought 1619 was a refreshing addition to the oeuvre.
Did it contain any errors? Any misinterpretations? I’ve read many histories and never read one that was perfect. That’s one of the joys of historical study. Perceptions change. What once seemed obvious becomes dubious, and sometimes discredited.
Read it and let me know what you think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Diane: Dr Jennings, my professor, was so much a southern woman that students were often amused at her language, which was old south all the way. She was about as conservative a person as you would ever meet. Still, she was a scholar. She had read the writings of ante-bellum plantation mistresses, and was acutely aware of how they perceived their second class status.
LikeLike
Thank you for your bracing condescension. God knows I needed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haaaa! What a puffed-up POS that guy is. And he has no notion how revealing he is of that fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Donald Trump believed that the “Continental Army captured the British airports” and said that he has heard that Frederick Douglass is doing a great job. He thought that there was a book called Two Corinthians and said it was his favorite book of the Bible, which he has clearly never read. When a reporter pointed to a copy of the Declaration of Independence on the wall of the Oval office and asked “What does that document mean to you,” he said, that it was “a document . . .” [stalling while he thought of something to say] about respect and love and unity. He has said many times that stealth airplanes are actually invisible (you know, like Wonder Woman’s) and that Article II of the Constitution gives the president the power to “do whatever he wants to do.” He told the German chancellor that D-Day was “a terrible day for [his] country.” We have a cruel, breathtakingly stupid and ignorant man running out country. Those are not gleanings from the “far left.” They are just the facts. I was a Republican. I gladly shook the hand of Mitt Romney when he came to speak to my Rotary Club back in Massachusetts. I broke with the party when the Bush maladministration FAKED the rationale for the second Iraq War. Diane Ravitch hates Donald Trump because he is a vile, loathsome, wannabe dictator and represents the worst, the most irredeemable in our history–the stuff that he and people like you, with your fake alias, countenance.
LikeLike
The man is irredeemably ignorant, biased and dangerous.
LikeLike
What a silly response. Yes of course citizens can “learn about history” online. These will mostly be adults. National History Day is about engaging high school students in that study. A public good. And a cheap one! Only $132k reqd to keep it going despite DOGE cuts!
Only libertarians—that anarchic fringe group that has increasingly infected the Republican party— contrary to hundreds of years of American tradition– believe there is no such thing as “public goods” (outside perhaps national defense). $132k is such a tiny proportion of the $5.1 trillion collected in income tax in 2024 that it can only be expressed as “8.8e-8.” [ = 0.0000088%].
LikeLike
Thank you, Ginny!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I am way off-base. But I do love it when I see Trump backpedal to his predictable transactional nature. Yes, he is old, cognitively impaired, and has surrounded himself with hardliner ultra-conservatives + toadies: could let himself relax & play golf while they run us all amok with their ideological, pro-authoritarian anti-American agendas. But he keeps his ear to the ground, & backs them off when they tread onto his popularity with base &/or run roughshod over druthers of his deep-pocketed donors. Gives me a sliver of hope we can get thro his term relatively unscathed.
LikeLike
Ginny. I’m looking for that sliver of hope too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Diane: I wrote wordpress and got a nice canned response, which gave some advice but then said they’d respond in person in 24 hours.
In the meantime, in perusing around the background, there was a note that the site owner needed to “invite you.” Do you know what that means and can you do it? Otherwise, I’ll wait to see what they have to say when they write again in person. CBK
LikeLike
CBK, wait for a human
LikeLike