The Washington Post announced that it will not endorse a candidate for president in the 2024 election. The Post is one of the most liberal newspapers in the nation. It was purchased in 2018 by billionaire Jeff Bezos. Bezos hired Will Lewis from the Rupert Murdoch news empire to lead the paper.
In a choice between the Democratic candidate, who respects the rule of law, and the former President, who incited an insurrection, The Washington Post will not render an endorsement.
This is the will of the billionaire who owns the paper. I extend my deepest sympathies to the members of the editorial board for the loss of their voice and editorial independence.
CNN wrote:
New York—
For the first time in decades, The Washington Post will not endorse a candidate in this year’s presidential election, the newspaper’s publisher announced Friday.
“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election,” Will Lewis said in a published statement. “We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”
The Post has endorsed a presidential candidate in every election since the 1980s. In his statement, Lewis referred to the Editorial Board’s past decisions to not endorse a candidate, noting that it is a right “we are going back to.”
“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility. That is inevitable,” Lewis continued. “We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”
Ahead of the announcement, The Post’s editorial page editor, David Shipley, told staffers that Lewis would be publishing a public note with the decision.
“The news is significant – and I know there will be strong reactions across the department,” Shipley wrote in a memo obtained by CNN.
The Washington Post is owned by billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos. Newspaper owners typically play a role in their publication’s endorsements and sign off on the editorials which reflect their views.
Marty Baron, a former executive editor of The Post, sharply criticized the decision Friday.
“This is cowardice, with democracy as its casualty. Donald Trump will see this as an invitation to further intimidate owner Bezos (and others),” Baron wrote in a social media post. “Disturbing spinelessness at an institution famed for courage.”
The decision comes just days after The Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked the newspaper’s planned endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris, leading to resignations from three editorial board members.
Two additional members of the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times resigned to protest the newspaper owner’s decision not to endorse either candidate.
It’s shameful that two major newspapers have been prevented from expressing the views of their editorial boards by the fist of their billionaire owners.
I sadly add the names of the billionaire owners of the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times –Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong and Jeff Bezos– to the blog’s Wall of Shame. They won’t know or care. But I do. It’s my small gesture of support for sanity and editorial independence .
In a news story about the WaPo’s decision not to endorse, this was reported:
An endorsement of Harris had been drafted by Post editorial page staffers but had yet to be published, according to two sources briefed on the sequence of events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — according to the same sources.

Endlessly disgusting. A good example of how the rich push the envelope and cannot live without unleashing their totalitarian ambitions on everyone else.
I used to love the Washington Post–I wonder if, who, and how many will resign?
They invite nationalizing of their businesses in order to save the workings of good government and its institutions for everyone (including them) from being destroyed by the likes of Trump and family, the Bannons, Putins, and the Stephen Millers of the world.
Pardon me while I puke on my television. CBK
LikeLike
Bezos should burn in Hell, leg-ironed to an unwashed, stinking T***p and being forced to watch and listen to a continuous and unending stream of invective from mistreated Amazon workers.
Are we cancelling our subscriptions?
LikeLike
I cancelled my digital subscription to the WaPo this afternoon.
The paper is a shadow of what it once was, and knowing that Bezos wants more conservative op ed writers, and want the paper to skew right, well he can so that with his money,not mine.
LikeLike
Me too
LikeLike
This is a matter of exactly zero consequence. The Washington Post used to be a center-left newspaper that was well-written and that appealed to liberals, moderates, and even most conservatives. But in the Bezos era it has become stridently partisan, only appealing to true believers. Skim the reader comments for any article or opinion piece that discusses political topics – 98+% of the commenters are left-wing, bitterly partisan, and quick to personally attack anyone who has a contrary opinion. In other words, exactly like this blog – it preaches to its choir.
That some left-wing newspapers don’t endorse for President in 2024 will have no effect whatever on the outcome.
LikeLike
Perhaps it’s not the Washington Post that’s moved, but the readers who left [sic] it when the Republican Party ceded its heart, mind, and soul to nativist, cruel, ignorant mendacity.
LikeLike
you forgot seditious…
LikeLike
Thank you for the reminder. “Seditious” should have been the first one.
LikeLike
This makes perfect sense, because the time when the Washington Post should “return to its’ roots” of many decades ago is when the choice is just so difficult, given that both candidates have good and bad points and there is an excellent case to make that both would be equally amazing presidents and both would make problematic presidents.
And when it’s just too difficult to discern whether any particular candidate would be a better choice for the country, newspapers are definitely under a journalistic obligation to inform the public of just that fact — that it absolutely is impossible to discern whether or not any candidate is better. And voters for Kamala and voters for Trump are equally admirable and very good people. Because neither candidate is perfect, and neither is a fascist, and neither is an authoritarian and neither incited an insurrection and promises to go after their critics if elected.
It’s always great when the so-called liberal media reassures Trump voters about how voting for Trump is a very good choice and proves they are caring people who just want what is best for this country.
That is how powerful the right wing propaganda has infected what was previously known as “journalism” and has become “reporting the right wing narrative”, with all criticism of the Democrat amplified as very concerning, and all criticism of the Republican presented as as both sides issue, in which only “partisans” are critical of the Republican.
I imagine this is what it felt like for Jews in 1930s Germany. Hitler had good and bad points, and who in the media can say for sure whether Hitler would make a great leader or not? Making voting for Hitler a perfectly reasonable choice made by “very good people” who are absolutely, positively NOT antisemitic at all, in fact, the media goes overboard to present them as people who don’t like Hitler’s rhetoric but just know Hitler would be a strong leader and them being fine with ugly, fascist rhetoric is something that should never be mentioned, lest those voters feel that there is anything wrong with voting for someone spewing antisemitism when the media says there is not, it is fine as long as you say you like that the antisemitic fascist is a “strong leader”.
LikeLike
Trump’s threats of retribution have had the effect he desired. And if he’s elected, free speech and freedom of the press are over throughout America. Nothing less than our Constitution and our fundamental freedom is at stake in this election.
LikeLike
This news comes just a few days after confirmation that Trump admires Hitler and is considered by people such as Mark Milley and John Kelly to be a “fascist” and the most dangerous man in America. Shameful.
LikeLike
This was contained in the news story in The Washington Post about the decision not to endorse:
“An endorsement of Harris had been drafted by Post editorial page staffers but had yet to be published, according to two sources briefed on the sequence of events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The decision not to publish was made by The Post’s owner — Amazon founder Jeff Bezos — according to the same sources.”
LikeLike
Since this blog values newspaper endorsements for President, here’s a perspective that few readers of this blog ever come across. It’s just easier for them to let MSNBC tell them what to think.
https://nypost.com/2024/10/25/opinion/the-post-endorses-donald-trump-for-president-the-clear-choice-for-a-better-future/
LikeLike
No one tells me what to think.
Billionaire Rupert Murdoch tells the editorial board of the New York Post what to write.
And you are impressed by Murdoch? He tells them what to think.
LikeLike
Please name even one issue where you dissent from standard left-wing dogma.
LikeLike
Tell me three issues where you disagree with that moron Trump.
LikeLike
There are others. Your turn now.
LikeLike
David Gateson,
You just said this:
I am voting for the president whose 3 Supreme Court picks struck down Roe V. Wade and endangered the health and life of women.
I am voting for the president who says Putin has the right to invade Ukraine and it is up to Ukraine to do whatever necessary to make Putin stop because Trump no longer wants to support them.
I am voting for a president who wants to cut Social Security and Medicare – and the Republican party who supports privatizing them in the name of “reform”.
It sounds a lot like a German voter saying that they aren’t anti-Semitic but they are voting for Hitler for “other reasons”.
Your VALUES are reflected in who you vote for.
You and all Trump voters share Trump’s value and share his character.
We who vote for Kamala share her character and values.
Germans who voted for Hitler shared his values.
That’s indisputable. I realize that a lot of white supremacist Trump supporters today keep trying to tell us that the Germans who supported Hitler were good people and are just like them! Trump supporters who now admire those Nazi era Germans who said they were voting for the “good” things Hitler wanted, like making Germany great again. Those German Hitler supporters felt just as “sad” about the millions of Jewish deaths because of their vote for Hitler as Trump voters like you feel sad about the end of abortion, the Ukraine people and the end of social security.
Trump voters and Trump share the same values.
Kamala voters and Kamala share the same values.
Own what you are. If you could have gotten away with conning people into giving you money for a fake university, you would not have hesitated for a minute. I’m guessing that you would express the same concern you have about the women dying because of Trump’s Supreme Court.
LikeLike
NYC Public Nutcase is up to her old tricks: attributing beliefs to people she doesn’t know and doesn’t have any information about.
I’m still waiting for this blog’s host to name even one issue where she dissents from left-wing orthodoxy. I named three issues where I disagree with Trump.
LikeLike
You don’t “disagree” with Trump on those issues.
If you did, you wouldn’t vote for him.
You sound as believable as a German who says that they disagree with Hitler about Jews, but voted to empower Hitler to do what he wants.
People who disagree with Trump on the issues you pretend to disagree with Trump on don’t vote for Trump. Just like people who disagreed with Hitler about Jews didn’t vote for Hitler.
No one believes that anyone who “cared about antisemitism” voted for Hitler.
Just like no one who “cares about Ukraine” or “cares about abortion rights” would vote for Trump.
Your vote for Trump proves those issues you claim to care about are not important to you. period.
Just like a German’s vote for Hitler proves that they don’t care about antisemitism as an issue.
You can try arguing that you can be “against antisemitism” and vote for Hitler, just like you can try arguing that you can be “for abortion rights” and “for Ukraine” and vote for Trump, but no one believes you.
You and Trump share the same values. Calling me nasty names just makes you sound like Trump!!!! LOL!
Are you going to threaten to “lock me up” next, so you sound even more like Trump?
You are what you are. A Trump clone who shares his values.
LikeLike
I called out how ridiculous it is to claim you don’t support a far right policy while voting to empower a president who has specifically promised to enact exact that far right policy that you are claiming you don’t support.
In other words, your actions speak much louder than your words. Writing that you “support” abortion rights is as meaningless as a Nazi apologist writing that many Germans who supported Hitler weren’t antisemitic. They voted to empower an antisemite spewing hate and violence against Jews because they were fine with laws harming Jews. Just like you are fine with antiabortion laws that harm women, despite saying you don’t “support” them. Your vote to empower Trump tells us otherwise.
LikeLike
It’s clear your ad hominem opener is an admission that she’s correct and has hit a nerve.
LikeLike
Gateson: Give it up. CBK
LikeLike
For my own peace of mind I canceled my subscription. Appalled.
LikeLike
In my mind, by not endorsing either candidate they are validating the spine-chilling rhetoric of Donald Trump as acceptable.
LikeLike
Ditto!
This is the domino effect after the first Newspaper’s decision- “Los Angeles Times.” Wishing this scenario was a dream with the hope of awakening to a joyful reality. Unfortunately, it’s a sad reality that get added into turmoil times!
LikeLike
I cancelled my LATimes subscription and let them know why. Guess WAPO will be behind a paywall now, too. Good riddance. These billionairre cowards dont need my $$ to continue their sane washing.
LikeLike
It’s a Good Paper — It Stays Bought
LikeLike
I hear by declare the cancellation of my subscription to the Washington Post.
Jan. 1 I vowed to no longer shop on Amazon. I’ve made it ten months and still committed!
Join me?
LikeLike
Cowards.
LikeLike
The WaPo motto, “Democracy dies in darkness,” which is on every front page of the newspaper, under the Washington Post heading, now clearly means that Bezos has no problem contributing to the demise of democracy in America next month. He has provided a curtain to cover up very significant truths that voters need to know about the differences between the candidates in the upcoming presidential election, and he is biting the hand that feeds him, so I strongly agree about the need to boycott WaPo and Amazon.
LikeLike
Whole Foods should also be boycotted, since that’s been a subsidiary of Amazon since 2017.
LikeLike
I wonder, what is the new collective strategy behind all these billionaire newspapers who have chosen not to endorse any presidential candidates-politicians in general, especially in this time of such a high importance in the history of the country? There is way too much at stake. So far, I truly don’t see the point. What is their concern……?
LikeLike