Dean Baker published a terrific article in The New Republic, called “The Biggest Success Story the Country Doesn’t Know About.” Baker is a macroeconomist who co-founded the Center for Economic and Policy Research(CEPR) with Mark Weisbrot.
He wrote:
Over the last few weeks, an extraordinary series of events has altered the course of an election that previously seemed to have few surprises in store. Eight days after Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt, President Joe Biden announced his historic decision to withdraw from the presidential race and cast his support for Vice President Kamala Harris to run in his stead. It will be some time before we know all the political ramifications of these events, but whatever they may be, they will not change the past.
What can the past tell us about what’s to come? Perhaps the most critical element of a candidate’s platform is their approach to the economy. In assessing Harris as a presidential candidate, people will want to look at the economic track record of the Biden-Harris administration. As always, the president takes the lead role in setting the economic course for the administration, but throughout Biden’s term in office, Harris was standing alongside him. The Republicans will surely blame her for everything that went wrong and many things that didn’t. On the other hand, Harris can take credit for what went right, and there is much here to boast about. Indeed, she can (and should) run on the outstanding—and criminally underappreciated—economic record of the Biden administration.
Under Biden, the United States made a remarkable recovery from the pandemic recession. We have seenthe longest run of below 4.0 percent unemployment in more than 70 years, even surpassing the long stretch during the 1960s boom. This period of low unemployment has led to rapid real wage growth at the lower end of the wage distribution, reversing much of the rise in wage inequality we have seen in the last four decades. It has been especially beneficial to the most disadvantaged groups in the labor market.
The burst of inflation that accompanied this growth was mostly an outcome of the pandemic and the invasion of Ukraine. All other wealthy countries saw comparable rises in inflation. As of summer 2024, the rate of inflation in the United States has fallen back almost to the Fed’s 2.0 percent target. Meanwhile, our growth has far surpassed that of our peers.
Furthermore, the Biden administration really does deserve credit for this extraordinary boom. Much of what happens under a president’s watch is beyond their control. However, the economic turnaround following the pandemic can be directly traced to Biden’s recovery package, along with his infrastructure bill, the CHIPS Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act, all of which have sustained growtheven as the impact of the initial recovery package faded. While the CARES Act, pushed through when Trump was in office, provided essential support during the shutdown period, it was not sufficient to push through the recovery.
Finally, the negative assessment that voters routinely give the Biden administration on the economy seems more based on what they hear from the media or elsewhere. They generally rate their own financial situation positively and say that the economy in their city or state is doing well. It is only the national economy, of which they have no direct knowledge, that they rate poorly.
Let the Good Times Roll!
Before going through what is positive about the Biden economy, I’ll just state the obvious. Tens of millions of people are struggling to get by, or not getting by at all. This is a horrible situation, which we should be trying to change every way we can. However, this has always been the case. We have a badly underdeveloped system of social supports, so that people cannot count on getting the food, health care, and shelter they need.
It’s also the case that the spurt of inflation in 2021 and 2022 was a shock after a long period of low inflation. People found themselves paying considerably more for food, gas, shelter, and other essentials, and in many cases their pay did not keep up, especially at the time these prices were soaring.
But the Biden administration has taken important steps to directly improve the situation for low- and moderate-income people, notably by making the subsidies in the exchanges created by the Affordable Care Act, or ACA, more generous and expanding the Child Tax Credit, or CTC. He increased the benefitsin the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, by 21 percent. Unfortunately, the expansion of the CTC, which was included in the initial recovery package, was only temporary. It expired at the end of 2021, and Biden has been unable to get the support needed in Congress to extend it.
While we should always recognize the enormous work left to be done, we need as well to acknowledge when we are making progress, and we have made an enormous amount of progress in improving living standards during Biden’s presidency. Also, the suffering of tens of millions of people at the lower end of the income distribution can’t possibly be the explanation for negative views of the economy. People at the bottom were suffering at least as much in 2019, when most people gave the economy high marks.

There goes that liberal media again.
LikeLike
According to Robert Reich if Harris wants to promote a more competitive economy, she will enforce the antitrust laws that both parties have largely ignored for decades. Most of our markets have about four gigantic companies in them. Less competition means that companies collude and price fix instead of compete. Harris should keep Lina Khan at the FTC and give her the resources to break up the gigantic companies, and provide more opportunities for smaller companies to compete. This should lead to greater innovation.
LikeLike
From what I’ve been reading for decades, poor people in red states are worse off than those living in blue states.
But it’s never the fault of the Republicans that rule those red states. They always find a way to blame and include insults to liberals.
“This chapter discusses how Republicans at the federal and state level are adding behavior modification requirements to a wide array of public benefits programs, thus driving a divide between red and blue states. Behavior modification requirements include tying public assistance to work requirements, family caps (limits on benefits based on family size), and drug tests. Congress first approved behavior modification requirements on a large-scale as part of welfare reform in 1996. These requirements are attempts to control the behavior of the poor, based on an assumption that poor people are morally deficient. To implement these changes, Republicans are using federalism tools such as waivers, or statutorily permitted deviations from federal program norms on a state-by-state basis. The Trump administration has already approved work requirements for Medicaid and signaled that it will permit a range of behavior modification requirements in housing and nutrition assistance programs. As a result, state variations in terms of poverty rates and poverty relief will deepen. In short, a person’s experience at the bottom of the economic ladder differs widely depending on where they live, and red state versus blue state policy differences are driving part of that geographic divergence.”
The Difference in Being Poor in Red States versus Blue States (Chapter 3) – Holes in the Safety Net (cambridge.org)
LikeLike
“the negative assessment that voters routinely give the Biden administration on the economy seems more based on what they hear from the media or elsewhere.“
Will there be a bunch of people belittling Dean Baker for mentioning the role the media plays, when all the smart people know that the NYT is wildly pro-Biden and pro-Harris and if the public is misinformed, it is the fault of Biden and Harris and has nothing to do with the media. Because no doubt the NYT ran a story about this and 500 stories about how Americans were worried about inflation, how bad inflation is, how inflation is the most important thing people think about, how people blame Dems for inflation, how people trust Republicans on the economy because of the very bad inflation.
LikeLike
The Chips Act and infrastructure are bold, long range investments that will create good paying jobs in the future. Most people do not appreciate the plans because they do not personally feel the impact now.
LikeLike
NYC public school parentI don’t think Baker is worried about “those people ” He is the Co Director of an economic think tank after being a director of the Economic Policy Institute . The name of his blog on their web page is “Beat the Press ” Daily he corrects the “Liberal Media ” And his fellow economists most of whom could not see a Housing bubble. As he says ” Economics is the one profession you can be wrong most of the time and not lose your Job”(while you cost the Jobs of thousands) . He goes after them issue by issue and article by article also pointing out when they get it right. Pointing out that they are anything but “Liberals” at the “Liberal Media “. An observation that has been noted on Diane’s Blog frequently, especially on Education Issues. Yesterdays Blog . I saw this opinion piece and barfed before I read Baker. He puts the economic details in perspective. https://cepr.net/the-wapos-republican-columnists-just-make-it-up/
LikeLike