Ed Johnson is a systems thinker and consultant in Atlanta. He cares passionately about the public schools of his city and keeps watch over the actions of the Atlanta Public School Board. Johnson is an adherent of the work of W. Edwards Deming; he believes in thinking of about how to change systems, not in quick fixes or the panacea of the day. In this letter to the Atlanta Public School Board, he takes them to task for their commitment to 50CAN, a school privatization group that was started in Connecticut as ConnCAN and funded largely by the Sackler family.
Ed Johnson writes:
“Join GeorgiaCAN for an informative session on the vision of Atlanta Public Schools! Gain insights from APS Board member [Dr.] Ken Zeff as he shares his perspective and engages in a parent discussion regarding APS’s vision. Let’s unite as a community to ensure that our children and the APS community have the resources and support necessary to pave the way for a brighter future.”
—GeorgiaCAN
We now know GeorgiaCAN is a state-level affiliate of 50CAN, do we not?
We now know 50CAN stands for 50-State Campaign for Achievement Now, do we not?
We now know GeorgiaCAN, as a 50CAN affiliate, pushes destroying public education and public schools with school choice, charter schools, and vouchers, do we not?
We now know, in December 2019, we had AJC parroting and giving prominent voice to GeorgiaCAN spouting free market school choice ideology, do we not?
We now know, in August 2023, we had Atlanta school board members Katie Howard, District 1, and Erika Mitchell, District 5 and current school board chair, involved with GeorgiaCAN, do we not?
And we now know, in September 2023, we had The King Center giving the 50CAN CEO a platform for some inscrutable reason, do we not?
So, let’s consider Ken Zeff in the way The King Center was considered last September:
50CAN evolved from ConnCAN (Connecticut CAN). ConnCAN was funded pretty much wholly by Sackler Family fortunes earned as ill-gotten profits from over-prescribed sales of Oxycontin by the family’s Purdue Pharma. Because of such greed for profits, hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. and worldwide have died, and continue to die, from opioid addiction.
As with similar other organizations and their local operatives—for example, The City Fund and its local operatives, Ed Chang leading reformED Atlanta—it is fairly well-known that 50CAN and its state-level operatives aim to dismantle hence destroy public education as the common good that is foundational to sustaining democracy, so as to transform destroyed public schools into privatized and commodified schools composing competitive education marketplaces. Think Milton Friedman and the “invisible hand of the market.”
It is also fairly well-known that 50CAN, like similar other organizations, has advanced its aim to destroy public education by expressly targeting and catalyzing Black communities to demand school choice and charter schools that will magically deliver “achievement now.”
In effect, 50CAN and such others “politrick” Black communities into facilitating their own destruction and that of their own children. Again, while “It takes a village to raise a child,” it also takes a village to destroy a child.
The usual assumption is that charter schools transformed from destroyed public schools are inherently better than “failing public schools.” This is a lie, plain and simple. It is impossible for charter schools to be inherently better or worse than “failing public schools.” Because entropy is a fact of life, our public schools need improvement, have always needed improvement, and always will need improvement. Reality offers charter schools no grace from the entropy fact of life.
To assert that charter schools are inherently better than “failing public schools” is like asserting members of a certain group of human beings are inherently superior to members of other groups of human beings, based solely on expressions of variation in some few arbitrarily-chosen human physical features said to signify “race,” which is another lie.
Charter schools do, however, appeal to certain retributive justice, behaviorally emulative, and selfish consumerist mindsets for which improvement-thinking has always been meaningless, at worst, and theoretical, at best. 50CAN knows this, and so uses it to catalyze Black communities to demand “achievement now.” “Instant pudding,” the late, great systems thinker W. Edwards Deming (1900-1993) might say.
Consequently, “Our children can’t wait!” has been a decades-long handy refrain that has always begged easy, quick, learningless change but never improvement with knowledge, which requires learning and unlearning.
Unfortunately, systems thinking teaches through a nonviolence lens that the more often easy, quick, learningless change happens, the less improvement becomes possible; then, the less improvement becomes possible, the less sustainable democracy becomes; then, the less sustainable democracy becomes, the more societal dysfunctions develop and emerge, after a time, in Black communities and elsewhere; then, the more societal dysfunctions show up, the more the refrain, “Our children can’t wait!”
It is all a destructively vicious, self-reinforcing feedback loop that 50CAN and similar other destroyers of public education are happy to catalyze in Black communities, in particular, and to support its playing out, if only continually, but continuously, ideally.
With systems thinking, it really is not hard to understand why some out-of-control-for-the-worse aspects of violent crime in City of Atlanta involving ever more “Black” teenaged children and younger other persons in Black communities has become such a challenge.
Currently, Atlanta’s culture predictably produces a homicide every 2.3 +/- 4.0 days, while predictably producing an aggravated assault every 3.7 +/- 10.7 hours.
These are realities Atlanta Police Department data reveal when viewed through a Deming kind of systems thinking lens instead of through a financial accounting-style lens that invariably creates an incomplete or false narrative that the media and others then report as fact.
Although some are quite capable to look below the performative surface, or show stage, of the proverbial iceberg and down into its greater depths to see and know Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., was also a profound systems thinker, systems thinking seems generally absent in Black culture; certainly, children labeled “Black” seem never to learn about this deeper and critically important aspect of Dr. King.
All too often the children learn to conserve racism and so-called white supremacy rather than learn to help humanity relieve itself of these scourges. The children learn and internalize racial categorization, the false narrative at the heart of racial violence. It seems the children never learn to internalize an understanding of human variation, the truth at the heart of nonracial nonviolence.
It is quite puzzling that some fight and rail against racism, all the while conserving it and the “race” lie racism needs in order to exist, in truth.
Therefore, a question for The King Center must be, why is The King Center giving a platform to 50CAN?
50CAN and GeorgiaCAN, private organizations known to be about making “Beloved Community” a virtual impossibility, in all respects.
Given this, we now know Dr. Ken Zeff lied when he swore, in taking the Oath of Office the Charter of the Atlanta Independent School System requires, “I will be governed by the public good and the interests of said school system,” do we not?
Being involved with GeorgiaCAN necessarily and unavoidably means Dr. Ken Zeff exercises, well, the “choice” to be governed by a private goodand the interests of GeorgiaCAN, hence 50CAN.
In a discussion during this month’s regularly scheduled school board meeting, Dr. Ken Zeff voluntarily professed quite enthusiastically to being a school choice proponent.
Well, he was at least honest about it—something we might appreciate, when some other Atlanta Board of Education members have shown they are not so honest about their being in the school choice camp.
Ed Johnson
Advocate for Quality in Public Education
Atlanta GA | (404) 505-8176 | edwjohnson@aol.com

Our prevailing system of management has destroyed our people. People are born with intrinsic motivation, self-respect, dignity, curiosity to learn, joy in learning. The forces of destruction begin with toddlers – a prize for the best Halloween costume, grades in school, gold stars – and on up through the university. On the job people, teams, and divisions are ranked, reward for the top, punishment for the bottom. Management by Objectives, quotas, incentive pay, business plans, put together separately, division by division, cause further loss, unknown and unknowable.
Divide responsibility and nobody is responsible. A leader is a coach, not a judge. Judging people does not help them. You can’t lecture equality into a system based on inequality.
LikeLike
What you are responding to is NOT an example of “judging people.” It is an explanation of a) what we are currently doing with our motivational systems (using extrinsic ones), b) the negative stuff that such extrinsic motivational systems make happen (people come to think that whatever people are trying to motivate them to do is so unappealing that they have to be bribed or punished to do it, and c) what we can do differently (rely upon and build intrinsic as opposed to extrinsic motivation.
THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS THAT CAN BE TAUGHT TO EDUCATORS. The ubiquity of extrinsic motivation schemes in education make these an example of really bad ideas that aren’t even noticed by most people because they are simply the background, the quotidian reality, to which people are enculturated from an early age.
Calling for people to change from reliance on extrinsic motivation schemes to reliance on nurturance of intrinsic motivation is definitely NOT business as usual that would have no effect.
You are in danger of becoming a one-trick pony. Every comment that you make, just about, has this same message–claims that the person in the post is doing or suggesting more of the same which has not brought about any change and so will not in the future. This is true of some things. It’s not true of this, and it’s not true of a lot of the stuff to which you apply this knee jerk critique. If people switched away from extrinsic motivation schemes to building intrinsic motivation, THAT WOULD BE A MAJOR CHANGE IN THE USUAL MODUS OPERANDI.
Educators really need to be taught to understand motivation. Deformers and many products of our education schools–especially of our leadership programs–do not.
LikeLike
Gosh, I forgot to add quote marks. Everything, except the last sentence are the words of W. Edwards Deming.
LikeLike
What I said still goes. This is not an example of judging people. It is an example of asking them to behave DIFFERENTLY in order to get better results.
LikeLike
“The forces of destruction begin with toddlers. . . .”
Those forces are mainly the Abrahamic faith beliefs and their followers who prefer mythology, fantastical beings and otherwise millennia old Middle Eastern desert tribal machinations about the world.
LikeLike
People have a very deep need for this stuff. It’s astonishing, really, how persistent it all is. There are many countries in Europe, which went through centuries of religious wars, where almost everyone has thrown off these ancient superstitions. I think that Americans are still a bunch of children, for the most part. Not many of them act like grown-ups.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Religion is proof that there is no idea so idiotic that millions of people won’t believe it if it is taught to them when they were children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That said, it is sometimes a source of virtue, leading people to lives of service. And then there are those people, nontraditional in their religious inclinations, who have forged interesting and rational speculative ideas that are religion-inspired or religion-adjacent.
Among the most dogmatic of religionists are the scientific materialist determinists, who, ironically, think that they are nonreligious even though they have all the attributes of the people that they despise. Those folks are like Ronald Reagan hating the Taliban when he was a true-blue representative of the American Taliban with, down the line, almost identical ideas as those held by the Taliban. A terrible irony there.
LikeLike
I am not sure competition as a presence in society can be laid at the feet of Abraham. Historically, rewards for behavior in western society can be laid closer to Napoleon and his system of rewards in the wildly successful French Army. This places the idea of rewards for behavior in the enlightenment rather than its spiritual predecessor. Medieval craftsmen we’re content to create magnificent works of art, carving figurines in cathedrals that would rarely be seen by anyone. We don’t even know who these people were.
I would never defend the atrocities that people have committed in the name of a god they claim, but instilled competition in toddlers seems to me a spawn of a different being.
LikeLike
The belief that test scores tell the story of education is a lie. Scores are weapon of privatization that is being used across the states to funnel Black and brown students into separate an unequal private schools. While it is sold to the public as “opportunity,” there is zero evidence that market based education is any solution to improving academics. What score based privatization does is perpetuate the shameful history of segregation in this country under the guise of choice. However, it is the schools that get to accept or reject students while the public is forced to pay to line the pockets of private companies to contribute to harmful segregation and damaging local public schools.
LikeLike
Until the teachers’ unions call a national action to end the federally mandated testing requirement, they are COMPLICIT IN CHILD ABUSE. This is not hyperbole. It’s the fact.
LikeLike
Agreed. Unions stepping up on this issue would shine a light on the inequities that score based privatization perpetuates.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree, Bob! The testing is about profits for testing companies. Those tests are bad.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, the standards and testing malpractice regime is, no doubt, child abuse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
actually, literally abusive, on top of being a con, a scam
LikeLike
Johnson always presents his case with impeccable logic.
LikeLike