Governor Kathy Hochul has fashioned a state budget that will profoundly damage rural schools in New York. She had to trim the budget somewhere but why cut foundation aid to the state’s most important function: the education of its children?
North Country Public Radio reported that nearly half the school districts in rural upstate New York face steep cuts. Hochul has proposed the elimination of a “hold harmless” requirement that requires each year’s state aid to be no less than in the previous year. This guarantee has provided stable funding but Governor Hochul says it’s obsolete. The cuts, however, will disrupt planning and inflict damage on the schools’ programs and staffing.
Educators and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are outraged over the way Governor Kathy Hochul is funding schools in her new budget plan.
Her proposed 2024-2025 education budget is for $35.3 billion, including a record $825 million increase for public schools. But it’s being distributed differently than in the past, and for the first time in years, many schools would actually lose funding.
Dozens of North Country districts face that scenario if the legislature doesn’t make changes.
Christopher Clapper is the superintendent of Alexandria Central School, a district of about 460 kids in Alexandria Bay, in Jefferson County.
With increases in state aid over the last few years (they got a 3% increase for two years from Foundation Aid being fully funded, and money from the American Rescue Plan Act) he says they’ve been able to do a lot.
“That has included buying all student supplies, so that burden isn’t on parents. We’ve had free school lunch for all students since 2021,” said Clapper. They’ve also increased the number of college credit classes in the high school, and expanded their Future Farmers of America (FFA) program.
But Clapper says he and other superintendents knew they couldn’t count on more increases. “We all assumed that that we would be dropped down to zero and there’d be no growth in foundation aid for ‘hold harmless’ districts,” said Clapper, following the two years of 3% increases. “And that [scenario] is kind of what my colleagues and I around the North Country have been budgeting for.”
Then Governor Hochul released her 2024-25 budget proposal.
“When we saw the numbers that came out, I mean, it was drastically different than a 0% increase,” said Clapper. Instead, it was a 13.2% decrease in aid, a reduction of about $517,000.
Clapper was shocked. He says “if that did come to pass, it would be absolutely catastrophic for this district.”
The state responds that the new budget reflects declining enrollments in many rural districts.
In a recent op-ed, Blake Washington, Hochul’s Division of Budget Director, wrote: “Instead of asking the question, “how much more money are our schools getting?”; it should be “why do we have a formula that forces us to pay for students that don’t exist?”
He’s referring to the fact that New York school enrollment has declined by about 10% since 2014.
In many North Country school districts, enrollment declines have been more dramatic, as high as a 50% decline in student populations over the last decade.
In Alexandria Central School District, public enrollment data shows about a 25% decrease in the student population since 2014, from roughly 620 to 460 kids.
But educating students doesn’t happen on a per-pupil basis, said Superintendent Chris Clapper. “If you have a kindergarten class of 20 students, and then that kindergarten class decreases to 17 students, it’s not as though there’s less cost of maintaining a classroom.”
He says you can’t hire 75% of a teacher, you can’t heat part of a room.
Kristen Barron wrote in the Hancock Herald about the fight against Governor Hochul’s proposed cuts.
Leaders of the New York State United Teachers (NYSUT) came to Hancock to meet with teachers and students. The Hancock Teachers Association (HTA) has been organizing the Hancock community to protest the cuts. There will be a protest rally in Hancock on March 8. The town, the teachers, the parents and the students are wearing blue to show their opposition to the cuts and their support for their schools.
HCS stands to lose $1.2 million dollars in state aid if the proposed cuts are adopted in the 2024-2025 budget, which is due by April 1.
“You’ve really stepped up here, and you have the best organized response that we’ve seen,” said Tim O’Brien, who oversees the Southern Tier for the state union. He noted the sea of blue t-shirts which were worn by students and staff on Friday as a sign of unity against the proposed aid cuts.
The HTA has also reached out in support of other area organizations facing proposed cuts such as the Delaware County ARC.
Of the twelve schools in Delaware County, 10 are getting cuts amounting to a loss of $4,919,401.00, according to a fact sheet compiled by HCS. Hancock and Franklin school districts, the smallest districts in the county, will receive the deepest losses, said Asquith during Friday’s meeting.
HCS has around 317 students.
Of the $4.9 million cut from the ten county districts, Hancock is shouldering $1.2 million or 24%, says the fact sheet.
The neighboring Deposit Central School District, which operates a merged sports program with HCS, is facing a 7.4% cut in aid. Downsville Central School District is facing a 33.8 % loss and Sullivan West in neighboring Sullivan County confronts a 17.1 % loss in aid, according to an Albany Times Union map based on data compiled by the New York State Education Department and New York State United Teachers.
Opposition to the cuts is bipartisan.
In an education budget of $35.3 billion, the cuts to rural districts look like a rounding error. And yet each cut represents lost jobs, lost courses, lost opportunities for rural students.

Thanks so much, Diane, for posting coverage of the governor’s proposed education cuts in New York State.
My own children went to Hancock Central School and got a great education. I want other students to have the same opportunities.
Please reach out to Governor Hochul and urge her to change course. For small, rural schools statewide, every vote and voice truly count.
https://www.governor.ny.gov/content/governor-contact-form
LikeLike
Done!
LikeLike
“The neighboring Deposit Central School District, which operates a merged sports program with HCS, is facing a 7.4% cut in aid.” Granted the distances in Upstate NY are greater,however if you can merge sports Districts you can merge other programs. NY State lost population in the last census. Almost all of that was in the Northern and South Western Tiers of the State. While the City and its suburbs either stayed stable or gained population. Meanwhile the tax burden both in income and school taxes is disproportionately falling on the higher taxed (and higher income) City and Suburbs. All that said I would support higher taxes to make our schools more responsive to all communities with smaller Classes and Lunch Programs… But here is the catch: The voters in these regions that are complaining now do not support that.
LikeLike
Joel,
The article explains that many of these rural communities have a significant number of second homes, homes that are used for weekenders. These transients never vote for higher taxes. I guess that is the purpose of foundation aid, to make sure every district has a solid financial floor.
Worse, as I’m sure you remember, Cuomo changed the minimum vote required to raise property taxes from 50%+1 to 60%+1. Why a super-majority?
LikeLike
Joel, shared services and other plans have been explored in Upstate New York, believe me.
The district where I spent many years teaching, Sullivan West, was the result of a rare three school merger. And, that district will be devastated, too, by the governor’s plan.
Meanwhile, the state can find hundreds of millions of dollars to underwrite a new sports stadium out in Buffalo.
(Please note: I love the Bills, but c’mon. Kids come first.)
LikeLike
“. . . but c’mon. Kids come first.”
Really? Who you trying to kid!
LikeLike
And they are closing SUNY. Down State Medical Center which serves Minority Neighborhoods in Brooklyn .
The Stadium may never pay back the costs in economic development. But a lot of votes from vendors to Construction Workers and fans attached to it
LikeLike
Joel,
Closing SUNY Downstate is truly appalling. Shocking, frankly. What were they thinking? It’s also a medical school that trains much needed doctors.
What’s really needed is to fund it properly. It’s a shame they let these institutions suffer from budget cuts and then feel justified eliminating them.
LikeLike
And in a Democracy the TAX decision is framed as a conversation about Values.
The “transients” enjoy their 2nd homes. And may even feel entitled to them. But they also enjoy the fruits of other’s labor.
The local women & men who cook for them, mow for them, fence repair for them, snow plow for them, property watch for them, massage for them, cut firewood for them, staff grocery stores for them. The interdependence is multi-layered & relational. The “transients” are related to these local people and they have a responsibility to them. Rural communities require good schools, libraries, infrastructure, healthcare & law enforcement. Just like the primary residences where the “transients” reside.
LikeLike
I believe Cuomo implemented a 2% or inflation rate cap with a 60% vote required to over ride the cap at a school district level. But that was done because of America’s aversion to taxation whether to pay for the French and Indian War or the education of their neighbors children. No argument from me that Cuomo was the best Republican Governor the State has ever had. He was heart broken when he lost the IDC.
But the State does not levy school taxes the state imposes income taxes and sales taxes and other fees that fund education . So the State Budget has not much to do with Local School tax and School Board Elections. Those owners of vacation homes do not vote for the State Assembly or Senate. Not in two parts of the state in any event. The locals could elect State Legislators who could do anything from end the cap, to raise income taxes.They never choose to do so.
LikeLike
The state provides $825 million additional for education, but some areas with declining student populations lose out. These include districts that have received steady funding despite losing half their students.
Some districts will receive more than before. Which ones? How much? Will this additional money help rapidly growing districts add facilities and teachers?
Steve
LikeLike
“But educating students doesn’t happen on a per-pupil basis, said Superintendent Chris Clapper. “If you have a kindergarten class of 20 students, and then that kindergarten class decreases to 17 students, it’s not as though there’s less cost of maintaining a classroom.”
He says you can’t hire 75% of a teacher, you can’t heat part of a room.“
According to the media that supports charters, this is not true. Per pupil funding is the gold standard. Some of these schools have had extraordinarily high per pupil funding.
Are these schools in communities that vote heavily Republican and low taxes and like charters for urban communities?
Obviously, these communities deserve well-funded schools, but so do ALL communities. Do these communities support that? Or just expect their own schools to be funded
LikeLike
The cuts fall weirdly all across New York State. It’s not just rural districts, from what I understand.
The governor’s plan is ‘shock and awe’…a sudden, huge twist in an already byzantine process. People who’ve forgotten more about school funding in NYS than I’ll ever know were surprised.
Fund public schools everywhere…do it coherently….take care of our students.
LikeLike
Are rural schools still receiving a lot more per pupil than urban schools? (I don’t know the answer, maybe they receive less).
Do those rural voters support giving the same per pupil money to urban schools that they have been getting, and do they support higher taxes to pay for it? (Not higher taxes on poor and working class, higher taxes on higher income people).
The problem is our side (correctly) believes that they deserve more because all children deserve more, but their side often believes their side only deserves more.
I would love it if there were town halls where those parents talked about how they see this issue. Just giving them more money without them ever having to confront the consequences of the policies they support seems problematic.
LikeLike
^^apparently politicians on “both sides” are outraged, but are Republicans outraged at money being taken from urban schools to support private charters? Nope. Then they somehow argue that “per pupil” funding is fair and correct.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent, I think Gov. Hochul’s budget is unnecessarily divisive. She made a mistake. A mistake for Democrats, a mistake for Republicans, a mistake whichever way someone wants to slice, dice and ‘side’ it up. The city, the country and everywhere in between. It would be great if Gov. Hochul would admit that reality and move on -with a revised funding plan. That’s the sort of leadership we need now.
LikeLike
I would happily support giving rural schools more funding if they support giving the same to urban schools. Do they?
LikeLike
Sorry to be a bit dense, NYC PSP.
I guess that’s a rhetorical question.
Having gone to a well-funded suburban school in the town where I grew up, then later student taught in a great public high school in NYC, and eventually moved up here to the country, where my kids were able to be at a wonderful, rural school, I’ve been very, very lucky. (And, I don’t forget that fact.)
And, some of these tough issues look very different -depending on where I’m sitting and who I’m talking with.
Meanwhile….looks like this topic is slowly but surely making it’s way downwards towards the land of “previous posts”. Thanks again, Diane and everyone who commented on here! I know the people in town appreciate your help. And, take care, NYC PCP.
LikeLike
Sorry John, it wasn’t meant to rhetorical. I honestly do not know if rural voters support giving urban schools in NYC the same extra funding that they receive.
It does seem like the Republican lawmakers upstate object to small class size initiatives for urban schools or say it will cost too much. It was upstate Republican lawmakers who helped empower the growth of charters for NYC, which give disproportionately high funding to charters empowered to teach the least expensive students and dump the rest.
If rural students are getting less funding, I absolutely support their funding being equalized with urban students. But if rural voters are still getting more, but not as much more as they used to get, then I believe that the Republican lawmakers who represent them have an obligation to support equal funding for urban students. Does that make sense?
LikeLike