The Missouri State Board of Education has granted permission to 19 school districts and one charter school to use alternative assessments and opt out of the annual state tests. The districts recognize that the results of the annual tests arrive too late and provide too little individual student information to be useful. This suggests “test fatigue.”
The Missouri State Board of Education unanimously approved an exemption for 19 districts and one charter school to measure student achievement using alternative assessments instead of the state’s prescribed methods.
Students in these districts will begin to see changes this fall as districts in the Success Ready Students Network implement their plan.
“Progress monitoring during the school year is already taking place within these school districts, though it may not be monitored by the state at this time,” Jeremy Tucker, superintendent of the Liberty 53 School District and Success Ready Students Network facilitator, told the board Tuesday. “We can really add more touch points from the start of the year all the way to the end of the year.”
The state board’s approval, called an innovation waiver, will allow the districts to break from components of the state’s evaluation system for three years.
“(Missouri Assessment Program results) don’t inform what we do on a regular basis,” Branson Public Schools Superintendent Brad Swofford told the board, mentioning the delay in receiving the test’s results.
Teachers prefer to look at assessments that show students progress over the school year, allowing them to adapt to the data and instill confidence in learning students, he said. Branson currently gives students NWEA assessments, tests that adapt questions to students’ achievement level and outputs a number to describe their level of knowledge.
Lee’s Summit R-VII School District, another of the districts in the network, will use this assessment to track students’ progress over the school year, Associate Superintendent of Academic Services Christy Barger told The Independent.
State Board of Education member Mary Schrag said she has heard that in states that already have similar programs, students feel “much more vested” in their educational progress.
Students in participating districts will likely complete the MAP test to comply with federal requirements, unless districts receive a federal waiver, but their schools will not be scored at the state level based on those results.

The Innovative Waivers are vetted by the USDOE as part of the State ESSA plan .. surprisingly few states are engaged in the process
LikeLike
Success Ready Students Network is yet another competency-based education group. It has ties to American Baptist University.
LikeLike
Competency-based education. More of the same pseudoscientific BS.
LikeLike
The NWEA tests are administered three times a year. Presumably to measure progress.
LikeLike
This is competency-based education on steroids. Here’s why, in ELA, it doesn’t work: the standards are very, very broad and vague and general. The tests have relatively few items. So, no “standard” is tested thoroughly enough to be validly tested. However, if these tests are given throughout the year, and the student misses the one question that deals with standard x, then he or she is assumed, incorrectly, not to have mastered that standard. Let me give a couple examples to clarify this. Suppose that the standard is “the student can make inferences from text” or “the student can understand words with multiple meanings.” The test contains 35 items. So, some of the “standards” are not even tested. Most are tested by one item. And the item looks like this:
“Sarah noticed that when James mentioned the busted guitar, Ralph looked away quickly.” Based on this sentence from the story, what can you infer?
One cannot logically assume that the ability to answer this one question will reveal whether a student is able to make correct inferences about texts IN GENERAL. Do you really think that the ability to answer the question above would reveal whether someone could answer the following question, which is also about making an inference from text?
Which of the following best summarizes Stevens’s observation that “This is the barrenness/Of the fertile thing that can attain no more”?
But if the tests are given three times a year, and if the teacher gets a supposedly actionable report the first two times, and if little Hector got this question wrong, then the plan for Hector, going forward, would be to do exercises on making inferences from text.
This is PSEUDOSCIENCE. The tests do not and cannot measure, validly, what they purport to measure. Anyone who doesn’t recognize it as such simply is not very bright OR has not thought carefully enough about what is actually being done on these tests.
LikeLike
CBE … yup, Bob, this is more of the same pseudoscientific BS. CBE was around in the mid 70’s. Many tried this is; it FAILED because it’s stupid.
LikeLike
I meant my comment below as a reply here.
LikeLike
Governor DeSatan likewise promised to do away with the extremely unpopular Common [sic] Core [sic] and its associated testing. So, what did he do? He pushed through revised Flor-uh-duh “standards” that are basically a regurgitation of the Common Core and tests on those called the Florida Assessment of Student Thinking, or FAST, which subjects kids to THREE such tests every year, with the last one being used for federal accountability purposes. So, same old bs, but even worse.
Welcome to the new boss, same as the old boss.
LikeLike
Dividing the test into three tests given throughout the school year will me even more pressure to teach to the test. So, this is heading precipitously in the wrong direction.
The standards-and-testing regime failed miserably, so let’s do A LOT MORE OF IT.
Idiocy.
LikeLike
We are doomed.
LikeLike
Yup. We are doomed. I hate to say it. A family member is a teaching assistant in Nevada. The teacher she works with constantly makes grammatical errors and tells the students information that is not factual. Most recently that “a circle” and “a rectangle” (the words) are ADJECTIVES!!!!!! I don’t get it. This is a TEACHER “teaching” this stuff. The teacher then tried to prove to my family member that the word actually was an adjective. It boggles the mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Teaching in Flor-uh-duh now:
https://floridaphoenix.com/2023/08/21/in-desantis-florida-were-raising-our-children-to-be-closed-minded-and-ignorant/
LikeLike
Terrific opinion piece. Thx, will check Florida Phoenix and States Newsroom in future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Copied from my web site:
No program is going to bring all children – learning disabled, those with emotional and physical problems- on par with the students who were ahead before they began for obvious reasons. Some people will never be able to run a 4-min. mile or to play Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata. However, educators must work with the child at his instructional level, where children feel safe enough to learn with all the mistakes that are part of learning, where they can achieve and feel good about themselves. This will not happen to children who, for a variety of reasons, are competing against more advance peers.
It is not the child’s fault if he/she can not read. It is the mandates of the politicians, administration, teachers and the inappropriate reading program. Furthermore, the assessment is inappropriate. A standardized test will not give the teacher the instructional level of the student. Children should be assessed with an appropriate tool in a quiet, calm setting. When children sit in fear, start crying, vomiting, running to the bathroom the test has already been invalidated. Plus, the standardized test does not give the teachers the instructional level of a child. The teachers’ assessment such as Marie Clay ‘s Observation Survey, Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark System, or even a running record will inform the teacher.
Albert Einstein stated, “I believe in standardizing automobiles. I do not believe in standardizing human beings. Standardization is a great peril which threatens American culture.”
Children at risk should be given double time with reading instruction from day one. A reading specialist should work in tandem with the classroom teacher working with the children on their instructional level. Instead of all this meaningless standardized testing give schools sufficient reading specialists to help the At Risk students in elementary school working with the At Risk on their instructional level.
Let their be more story time, dramatizing, role playing, singing, poetry, and finger plays in pre-k- no direct teaching of the alphabet names and sounds and above all no memorizing of sight voc. Words in isolation have no meaning.
If we stopped all this standardized testing we would have the money to provide for the needed reading specialists and smaller class size. We would, furthermore, have more time to devote to the teaching of language arts – reading, speaking, listening, and writing- all which support literacy. Let the teachers’ assessment be sufficient. Teachers’ assessments are far superior than any standardized test. How is it possible to have an unbiased standardized test anyway?!
We must listen to early childhood literacy experts and not to the demands of politicians who have no educational background.
LikeLike
Yes!
LikeLike
Click the link to Success Ready — after noting the use of the platitudinous words ‘success’ and ‘ready’ — and it says, “The SRSN supports Missouri public school stakeholders in using a competency-based mind-set to personalize learning in ways that ensure every student has the knowledge, skills and dispositions they need to be high school, college, career and workplace ready.” That Pearsonalized, Orwellian language sounds like it’s straight from the corporate horse’s mouth. I always did think Arne Duncan looked like a horse’s mouth. Sure, it’s dental shaming, but come on, it’s Arne Duncan. He deserves it.
LikeLike
Go to the website. It’s still part of the standards and testing malpractice regime. . . even worse it seems to me. Competency based education has been shown to be a less than adequate teaching and learning process. I’m surprised the right wingers here in this state haven’t exploded over the CBE of this program.
LikeLike
CBE is constant testing.
LikeLike
Exactly. Constant testing of little bits of usually irrelevant information. Can we say boring!
LikeLike
Off topic.
I received a request from my niece to send her an email address for her son’s soccer team fundraiser. If he didn’t have enough for today he was going to have to “run hills” (in 97 degree 84% humidity-hey it’s summer in the Show Me State). Aside from the idiocy that is that coaching practice, I did some research and there is a fund raising company that pays for, it seems, email addresses. Needless to say I didn’t give her mine and contacted the Supe’s office, sent an email to find out more about it.
Has anyone heard of this type of fundraising.
LikeLike
I sit on the board of the booster club for the high school chorus that my daughter is in. We do not employ such groups, but I can understand why someone would, find raising is hard work.
LikeLike
“State Board of Education member Mary Schrag said she has heard that in states that already have similar programs, students feel “much more vested” in their educational progress.”
What a revelation!
LikeLike