Justin Parmenter, a National Board Certified Teacher in North Carolina, is concerned that vouchers in his state will go to private and religious schools that discriminate when they choose their students. Republicans in the Legislature have a super-majority since a teacher elected as a Democrat—Tricia Cotham—betrayed her voters and flipped parties. Republicans ca pass whatever they want without fear of a veto. Would you want your tax money to fund a school that would not accept your own child or one where teachers speak in tongues?
He wrote recently:
As this year’s legislative session hits the homestretch, public education advocates are waiting to see whether proposed changes to North Carolina’s school voucher system become law.
On the House side, brand new Republican Rep. Tricia Cotham sponsored House Bill 823, a bill which would expand funding for vouchers by hundreds of millions of dollars a year until the annual amount going to school vouchers eclipses $500 million in school year 2032-33 and every year thereafter.
In addition to massively increasing funding for vouchers, the proposed legislation eliminates income eligibility requirements so that any student in the state–regardless of financial need–may use public money to attend private schools. That means North Carolina taxpayers will be subsidizing the tuition of wealthy families whose students already attend private schools.
A parallel bill has been filed in the Senate.
Advocates are concerned about the proposed legislation for a variety of reasons. Among them are the continued depletion of resources available to public schools; the relative lack of accountability charter and private schools have, which mean no real way to track return on investment, and; the use of public dollars to support institutions which are legally able to discriminate against children.
Federal civil rights law prohibits discrimination on a variety of grounds for institutions that receive federal funds, among them religion, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity) and disability.
In most cases, those prohibitions do not extend to religious private schools which take in more than 90% of North Carolina’s voucher students. Many of those schools accept public tax dollars via the Opportunity Scholarship voucher program and deny admissions to LGBTQ students, students whose families practice the “wrong” religion, and students who have special needs such as learning disabilities. And many of the schools come right out and advertise their discriminatory practices in official school documents.
Here are a few examples:
Students with special needs:
Alamance Christian Academy in Graham, NC, assesses students based on their “emotional readiness,” as well as academic and behavioral histories as justification to refuse admission to students with “deficiencies.”
Southeastern Christian Academy in Shallotte, NC says “A student may be ineligible for enrollment based on achievement and/or individual learning styles. Because SCA is a private school, compliance with IEPs [Individualized Education Programs] issued by the public school system is not required.”
North Raleigh Christian Academy also discriminates against children with special needs. The school’s admissions policy states that NCRA only accepts students who score on grade level and will not admit anyone with an IQ of 90 or below. IEPs are not available at NCRA.
LGBTQ students:
Many of North Carolina’s private schools that receive millions in taxpayer funding via vouchers specifically deny admissions to LGBTQ students or vow to expel any student who is discovered to be LGBTQ after enrolling.
For example, Wesleyan Christian Academy does not accept students who are discovered to be “participating in, supporting, or condoning sexual immorality, homosexual orientation, homosexual activity, or bisexual activity; promoting such practices; or being unable to support the moral principles of the school.”
Wesleyan’s promise to exclude those students appears on the same handbook page where the school claims to seek students who are “reflective of the global community in which we live.”
Fayetteville Christian School similarly bars LGBTQ students, labeling them “deviate [sic] and perverted.”
High Point Christian Academy also accepts public funding through Opportunity Scholarship vouchers. This institution makes it clear that attendance is “a privilege and not a right,” and explains that when conduct within a student’s home diverges from “the biblical lifestyle the school teaches,” the school may refuse admission or discontinue enrollment.
Students with religious differences:
More than 90% of the students claiming public voucher dollars attend religious private schools, and the vast majority of those schools are Christian schools. While some are tolerant of religious diversity, many of them will not accept students unless they are Christian.
Freedom Christian Academy in Fayetteville only accepts students “whose home life is led by parents who have a vibrant relationship with Jesus Christ.” The student’s spiritual life must demonstrate “a relationship with Jesus Christ resulting in age-appropriate virtue and high moral character.”
Fayetteville Christian Academy, previously mentioned above for denying admissions to LGBTQ students, specifically states in its admissions requirements that it will “not admit families that belong to or express faith in non-Christian religions such as, but not limited to: Mormons (LDS Church), Jehovah’s Witnesses, Muslims (Islam), non-Messianic Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, etc.”
Research clearly shows that the most important factor in student learning outcomes is access to excellent teachers. North Carolina requires public school teachers to be licensed in order to demonstrate they have the necessary skills for the job.
Mount Zion Christian Academy in Durham does not require teachers to be licensed, but this voucher-receiving organization is proud of the fact that the school’s entire staff has demonstrated being filled with the Holy Spirit by speaking in tongues.
Public schools are proud to welcome, accept and support our students exactly as they are. It’s disappointing that North Carolina’s state legislature and “school choice” proponents are moving in the opposite direction by exponentially increasing public funding for schools that deny learning opportunities to specific students.
If you object to your public tax dollars funding institutions that discriminate in this way, please contact your state legislator and urge them to oppose expansion of the Opportunity Scholarship voucher program.

There are 174 Christian schools with 32,075 students in N.C. There are 47 Catholic schools with 13,328 students.
WaPo, “Firing of Gay Catholic School Teacher in N.C.” 7-11-2023
LikeLike
My GOD tells me that all those queers and perverts should be. . .
(complete the sentence)
LikeLike
The info. in the final paragraph which is about the Nazi persecution of Jehovah Witnesses ( “Protestant Churches and the Nazi State” at the FacingHistory.org site) may not be commonly known. The article describes, “storm troopers for Jesus Christ.”
In a separate topic, the Christian Legal Society (possibly 120 law school chapters) requires members to sign a, believe in, statement. Allegedly, the University of Idaho chapter includes one man, one woman, terminology.
LikeLike
We should get the attention of our reps. But they are few, and most of their contact is with people who think my opinion is wrong.
I have recently been reading a book on the period in US History during the formative years of the country. One thread of thought running through the literature was the belief that political entities should be small enough to accommodate citizens’ involvement in political affairs. The alternative was viewed as tyranny. The thought was that the majority of political forces threatening liberty were governmental. This is due to monarchs Europeans had experienced during the colonial period and their record of being hostile to civil liberties. Local government was seen as a protector of civil liberty.
Then came the ascendancy of the federal government, which stepped into Jim Crow to assure civil liberties to the victims of that atrocity. Knowing this history, modern conservatives have looked to local control to negate civil liberties guaranteed by the constitution.
LikeLike
“Moroni and the Swastika…” written by David Conley Nelson (2015) makes the following point, “Mormons became the most successful foreign-born new religion in Germany during the Nazi years.” Conley’s explanation is interesting because it describes American legislators who were LDS members as giving legitimacy to Mormonism in the eyes of Hitler. For Hitler, before the US joined the allies, the nation represented a potentially powerful force that could aid his regime.
As is true of the Catholic Church, there were individual Mormon faithful who were heroes in trying to obstruct Hitler.
LikeLike
If churches are hell-bent (so to speak) on pushing taxpayer-funded “Christian” (nearly always) sanctioned hate and discrimination on our young people, they need to start paying taxes to fund all this crap and stop taking unaccountable government handouts from public schools $$$ in the form of vouchers.
LikeLike
AMEN, AMEN, AMEN!
I think ALL churches should pay TAXES. Church people use our infrastructure and more. DUH…
Maybe I should open up my own church and to avoid paying TAXes.
LikeLike
We should all open churches as you say. Then we can gather and tell our friends to vote for Democrats and spread lies about the GOP. We can write off our expenses avoiding taxes. We can create e-mailing lists and apps to spread the message that progressives are the best and the GOP are evil. We will then be able to write off the cost of computers, tech support etc., as well.
Since I believe that taxes are the price I pay to live in a civilized society, I won’t start my church but, the idea is a revenge fantasy.
Btw- Republican Sen. Vance (Peter Thiel’s creation) developed a religious app for prayer.
LikeLike
Do we tax all non-profits? How do we do this without tearing down the wall between church and state?
I am almost old enough to remember when the black churches provided the leadership for the civil rights era. I cannot help but wonder that modern opponents of civil rights would enjoy the power to tax the churches that opposed oppression.
I say rebuild the wall. We will get Donald Trump to pay for it.
LikeLike
IMO that wall between church and state is coming down…”In exchange for their tax-exempt status, churches are supposed to refrain from engaging in political activities (BWAHAHAHAHAHA!) per the Johnson Amendment (1954). Unfortunately, not all do. And, even when they are caught breaking the rules, few are ever punished by having their tax-exempt status revoked.” So there’s that…as well as the recent state board decision in Oklahoma to open a religious charter school.
LikeLike
I know a church with a pride flag out front. A friend of mine used to be the minister. Want to tax that church? I know many people on the opposite political side of you and me who would jump at the chance to rid the world of that church and its ideas. Do we allow that because we hate all the Christian Nationalists?
LikeLike
The IRS enforces the requirement that churches not engage in politics. And, laws are added that strengthen their ability to enforce.The term non-partisan receives a total clarification so that it can not be used as cover for clearly partisan goals.
LikeLike