Heather Cox Richardson wrote early today about the GOP’s irresponsible politicization of the defense budget. Typically the defense budget passes with a bipartisan vote. But not this year because the House GOP majority is completely cowed by the hard-right extremists. The Republican crazies inserted all their anti-WOKE priorities into the bill, which will not be passed by the Senate. Marjorie Taylor Greene owns House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.
Richardson writes:
Traditionally, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which funds the annual budget and appropriations of the Department of Defense, passes Congress on a bipartisan basis. Since 1961 it has been considered must-pass legislation, as it provides the funding for our national security. For all that there is grumbling on both sides over one thing or another in the measure, it is generally kept outside partisanship.
Late last night, House Republicans broke that tradition by loading the bill with a wish list from the far right. Republicans added amendments that eliminate all diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in the Defense Department; end the Defense Department program that reimburses military personnel who must travel for abortion services; bar healthcare for gender transition; prevent the military academies from using affirmative action in admissions (an exception the recent Supreme Court decision allowed); block the Pentagon from putting in place President Biden’s executive orders on climate change; prevent schools associated with the Defense Department from teaching that the United States of America is racist; and block military schools from having “pornographic and radical gender ideology books” in their libraries.
House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) tweeted: “We don’t want Disneyland to train our military. House Republicans just passed a bill that ENDS the wokism in the military and gives our troops their biggest pay raise in decades.”
In fact, the events of last night were a victory for right-wing extremists, demonstrating that they hold the upper hand in the House. Representatives Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ) and Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA), both military veterans, expressed shock that so many Republicans voted to strip abortion protections from military personnel. “[T]hey will say, ‘this is a really bad idea,’ ‘this is not where the party should be going,’ ‘this is a mistake,’” Sherill said. “[W]ell then why did everyone but two people in the Republican conference vote for this really bad amendment?”
The bill passed by a vote of 219 to 210, largely along partisan lines. This year’s budget is $886 billion as the U.S. modernizes the military to compete with new threats such as the rise of China, and it provides a 5.2% increase in pay for military personnel.
But Senate Democrats will not vote for it with the new partisan amendments and are working on their own measure. While there will be a conference committee to hammer out the differences between the two versions, McCarthy has offered a position on that committee to Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), one of the extremists. This is an unusual offer, as she is not on the House Armed Services Committee.
House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said: “Extreme MAGA Republicans have hijacked a bipartisan bill that is essential to our national security and taken it over and weaponized it in order to jam their extreme right-wing ideology down the throats of the American people.”
“We are not going to relent, we are not going to back down, we’re not going to give up on the cause that is righteous,” Representative Scott Perry (R-PA) said.
Representative Sean Casten (D-IL) summed up the vote today on Twitter. “The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is the bill that funds all of our military operations. It is typically bipartisan and is about as serious as Congress gets. What weapons of war we fund, which allies we share them with, how we recruit. National security is a BFD. We can have our political debates about any number of issues but it is generally understood that when Americans are willing to sacrifice their lives to defend us, it’s time to check the crazies at the door. But today, the crazies won.
“They won first because [McCarthy] put the crazies in positions of power. But second because none of the “moderate” Republicans had the courage to stay the hell out of KrazyTown…. Is every member of the [House Republican Conference] a homophobic, racist, science denying lunatic? No. But the lesson of today is that the ones who aren’t are massive cowards completely unfit for any position of leadership.
“There is space—and demand—for reasonable differences of opinion in our democracy. This isn’t about whether we agree. It’s about whether we can trust that—differences aside—we trust that we’ve got each other’s back if we ever find ourselves in a foxhole together. That’s usually a metaphor, conflating the horrors of war with the much lower-stakes lives that most of us are fortunate enough to lead. But today, the entire [House Republican Conference] told us—both literally and metaphorically—that they don’t give a damn about the rest of the unit.”

The Democratic Party’s love affair with Wall Street and the military-industrial complex is on-going. The U.S. is typical of dying empires, as it over extends by maintaining hundreds and hundreds of military bases around the world. Meanwhile, domestic infrastructure implodes and the working class sees little hope for a better future. Both corporate-sponsored political parties are to blame for the U.S. militarism that currently destablishes the world. The Pentagon’s budget should be cut… a lot.
LikeLike
So, in essence, you’re trying to both-sides the fact that Republicans are radical and hate the core values of American democracy?
Bad move, bro.
LikeLike
The U.S. is not a functioning democracy. One party limits who can vote while the other limits who you can vote for. Both parties cater to the needs/desires of their billionaire/corporate donors while working class concerns are largely ignored. The U.S. government is 100% corrupt. (Independents outnumber Republicans. Independents outnumber Democrats. No wonder so many Americans perceive a need for a viable third party.)
LikeLike
Bernie Sanders and a few other politicians
have pointed out the same thing, but unfortunately, they have no power to actually cut military spending and little power to even influence the conversation.
They can’t even get the Pentagon to abide by our laws. The Pentagon keeps failing their own government audits , with trillions continually going unaccounted for but nothing is ever done.
It is taking away money from critical social and infrastructure programs but neither major party does anything because most politicians are either afraid of being called soft on defense, afraid of being accused of “not supporting the troops” or simply owned by military contractors who fund their campaigns and provide jobs to their states.
As President Johnson once told an advisor “I can’t pull out of Vietnam because too many of my friends are making too much money over there”.
Some things never change and never will.
LikeLike
By “destablish” do you mean “destabilize”? Because “destablish” isn’t, you know, a word in the English language.
LikeLike
Tell that to the AI spell correct, which is always changing my real words to made up ones.
And sometimes changing my made up ones to real ones.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s almost as if the AI bot was trained on my goofy poems.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hahahahaha! Yes—one wonders where.
LikeLike
SomeDAM AI
The AI bot was trained
On SomeDAM goofy verse
Which hobbled AIs brain
And made the bot perverse
LikeLiked by 1 person
Destablish” ain’t a word
Is really quite absurd
But no one told the bot
Who uses it s lot
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bots will be Bots
They’re always unbelievable
And often inconceivable
Will use a made-up word
That no one’s ever heard
They never tell the truth
And GPT is proof
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, you identified my typo error. (Thanks for reading my comment!)
LikeLike
Good, let them derail the funding for the world’s largest death and destruction machine.
LikeLike
The funding passed, but with these additions that make the lives of rank-and-file soldiers worse.
LikeLike
Fortunately, this bs will be stopped in the Senate.
The GOP has become the party of vandals.
LikeLike
If the crazy people were in power, they would say nothing. This is all a charade to take attention away from the infrastructure problems, the incompetence in awarding contracts to those who possess expertise rather than donation ability, and the complete lack of understanding this crew possesses about almost anything. They seek to maintain power with distractions.
LikeLike
It is interesting, however, that there is conservative opposition to a defense bill. This harkens back to the days following the First World War and the Nye Commission report that laid our entry into that war at the feet of bankers. In that day, a coalition of anti-war idealists joined with traditional conservatives like William J Bryan to oppose international entanglement. Their cause was manipulated by Americans who sympathized with European fascists on other issues to create the America First movement.
In a large part, the internationalism the US has experienced in the post WWII era has been a reaction to that attitude, which has been perceived as giving aid to Hitler. Not so long ago, opposition to internationalism was a death sentence for any national political figure.
LikeLike
Thanks, Roy, for your notes providing historical background to current events.
Trump, of course, is utterly ignorant of history. So, how did he come to pick up the name of this pro-Nazi organization–America First–for constant use in his speeches?
I suspect that he picked this up from Stephen “Goebbels” Miller.
And the isolationism being preached by the lunatic Trumpanzee wing of the Repugnican Party now is, of course, just what Tsar Vladimir the Indicted wants for the U.S. Trump has long been Vladimir’s dog.
LikeLike
Russiagate ate your brain. Trump pursued a more hawkish foreign policy regarding Russia than did Obama. Your neo-McCarthyism is soooooo twentieth century.
LikeLike
James,
In what way was Trump “hawkish” towards Putin? He always looked at him as if Putin was a superior being. He was deferential to Putin. When Putin said he didn’t interfere in the 2016 election, Trump believed him, not the CIS or the FBI. He was Putin’s puppet.
LikeLike
Trump was dangerously hawkish on Russia. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Trump implemented a Nuclear Posture Review with a more aggressive stance toward Russia;
2. Trump armed Ukraine (to a degree Obama had previously refused);
3. Trump approved bombing targets in Syria (Russians were killed in some of those bombings);
4. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the INF treaty:
5. Trump ended the Open Skies Treaty:
6. Trump approved the sale of Patriot missiles to Poland;
7. Trump approved sending warships to the Black Sea;
8. Trump approved new sanctions against Russia (on several occasions);
9. Trump forced Russian media to register as foreign agents;
10. Trump expelled foreign diplomats;
11. Trump approved funds for training Polish and Latvian troops “to resist Russian aggression”;
12. Trump refused to recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation; and,
13. Trump send additional troops (1000+) to Poland.
I can add more, if you’re interested.
Trump was a bad president because he was similar to other presidents, not because he was different.
LikeLike
A little lesson that you and Trump learned from Roy Cohn: when something is obvious, double down on denying it.
This stuff goes way, way back.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/19/trump-first-moscow-trip-215842/
LikeLike
Withdrawing U.S. troops from Germany. Withdrawing them from Northern Syria and turning it over to Assad and the Russians. Withdrawing from the Open Skies and INF Treaties at the very time when Valdimir the Defenestrater was fielding hypersonic nuclear weapons. Telling aides that he wanted the U.S. out of NATO. Alienating all of our NATO allies. Withholding military aid to Ukraine. Denying that Russia had anything to do with the 2016 election. Turning over secrets to the Russian ambassador in the freaking White House no less. Yeah, Trump being “tough on Russia.” Give me a freaking break.
Trump has long, long, long been Putin’s dog, and the whole world knows it except a) extreme morons in the Repugnican Party and b) people who are paid by the Russian disinformation machine to pretend otherwise and c) a few ultra-wacko extreme lefties in the U.S., so extreme that they are willing to support illegal, genocidal, imperialist wars, press censorship, jailing and killing of opponents, and organized state theft of the nation’s resources conducted by their Glorious Leader in Moscow.
LikeLike
We don’t need American banks. We’re rollin’ in dough coming out of Russia. –the male scions of the Trump Criminal Organization
LikeLike
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/17/politics/trump-soft-on-russia/index.html
LikeLike
Vladimir certainly got his money’s worth out of his considerable investment in putting his dog, Trump, into the Oval Office. Check out list of 37 returns of the favor that Trump delivered to his handler Putin while in office.
LikeLike
“Russiagate ate your brain.”
@ JimmyBoy:
From Volume 1 of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on “Russiagate”:
“The Russian government directed extensive activity, beginning in at least 2014 and carrying into at least 2017, against U.S. election infrastructure’ at the state and local level…Russian activities demand renewed attention to vulnerabilities in U.S. voting infrastructure. In 2016, cybersecurity for electoral infrastructure at the state and local level was sorely lacking; for example, voter registration databases were not as secure as they could have been. Aging voting equipment, particularly voting machines that had no paper record of votes, were vulnerable to exploitation by a committed adversary…Russian government-affiliated cyber actors conducted an unprecedented level of activity against state election infrastructure in the run-up to the 2016 U.S. elections…the Committee found ample evidence to suggest that the Russian government was developing and implementing capabilities to interfere in the 2016 elections, including undermining confidence in U.S. democratic institutions and voting processes.”
From Volume 2 of the Senate Intelligence Committee report:
“In 2016, Russian operatives associated with the St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA) used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign designed to spread disinformation and societal division in the United States…The Committee found, that the IRA sought to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election by harming Hillary Clinton’s chances of success and supporting Donald Trump at the direction of the Kremlin…The Committee found that the IRA’ s information warfare campaign was broad in scope and entailed objectives beyond the result of the 2016 presidential election…IRA social media activity was overtly and almost invariably supportive of then-candidate Trump, and to the detriment of Secretary Clinton’s campaign.”
You want more? Because there is LOTS more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t try to confuse an ideologue with facts, Democracy. LOL. Facts like, this committee was chaired by and was majority Republican and found overwhelming evidence that the Russian government substantially interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Vladimir’s dog, Trump.
LikeLike
Oh, and thank you, democracy!
LikeLike
It’s so strange that there are still extreme leftists in the United States who think that contemporary kleptocratic, authoritarian Russia is some sort of Socialist state. Totally bizarre. Whether James is one of those, who can say? There are other possibilities.
LikeLike
Who pulls the strings of the puppets that make up the extreme right in Congress?
Traitor Trump is the answer. And this micromanaging traitor is obsessed with punishing and get even with everyone and anything that didn’t kowtow to his wants when he was pretending to be president while worshiping dictators and drooling to join that brutal club — for life.
Trump wanted the military to shoot peaceful demonstrators in DC, then he wanted to nuke a hurricane, and a few years later, he wanted the military to grab all the voting machines in battle ground states so he could stay in power. The military did not do what he wanted.
Traitor Trump must control every element of government just like he has controlled his crime family for decades. He is also thinking he might win in 2024, like he won in 2016, when he didn’t expect to win.
LikeLike
Jabba the Trump’s poll numbers are really good. In a bizarre reflection on the ignorant half of the U.S. electorate, the elderly sexual predator, con man, insurrectionist, Russian asset, and imitation of a can of Spam to which has been attached troll-doll blonde hair is WAY ahead of his nearest competitor, he of the Nancy Sinatra white go-go boots. Trump’s sliming upward in the polls has Murdoch quite unhappy, doubtless because he knows that if Trump is the nominee, again, then the party loses, again.
MAGA: Make Another Grand Assflop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bob, troll dolls have much cuter hair.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmmm. Point well made. But troll doll hair does have the same sort of weird stiffness, which in Trump’s case comes from hairspray. I am curious about how Pence the Dense gets his unnaturally solid white hair. and why a fly would be attracted to this. Bird doo?
LikeLike
Trump has been described as a Narcissist.
Huffpo, citing a professional psychology source, provides clarity about the term’s definition. (7-15-2023) There are two main types of “trait Narcissism” which is separate from Narcissistic personality disorder. The two trait types are grandiose and vulnerable. Both types show antagonism and lack of empathy.
The vulnerable type is more likely to be diagnosed with borderline personality disorder than with Narcissistic personality disorder. The vulnerable type is characterized by heightened emotional sensitivity. The behavioral affect of grandiosity masks their feelings of inadequacy and insecurity.
Just thought the info provided
a concise summary and it
aided my understanding.
Maybe, others might be
interested in the
reference to the article.
LikeLike
Several psychologists have said that Trump has Malignant Narcissism Personality Disorder, and one has even written a
LikeLike
written a book about this.
LikeLike
The book has 27 professional contributors:
LikeLike
thanks Bob.
LikeLike
You know, Linda, if you want to post a link to an article, all that you have to do is click on the URL to select it, copy the URL (Command-C), and paste it (Command-V) into the comment box on WordPress.
LikeLike
Thanks Bob
LikeLike
Bob, you’re hardly qualified to make fun of anybody’s hair!
LikeLike
You are disparaging my beautiful dome, Jimmy?
LikeLike
I, too, had pretty plumage once. –W. B. Yeats
Note that I did not go for growing hair on one side of my head so long that I could do a comb-over and spray it down with industrial-strength hairspray (after having dyed it an utterly unnatural blonde color, just his Trump’s Mommy did when hers turned grey).
LikeLike
So, relatively speaking, I would say that the difference in our responses to aging does in fact qualify me, gives me the moral high ground from which I speak about this traitor to his country and piece of filth who conned his way into the presidency.
LikeLike
His hair is A TELL.
LikeLike
It’s like the sort of detail that a gifted novelist creates to demonstrate that a character is a sleazebag. Like so much about the Orange Idiot, it’s self-parodying.
LikeLike
I’m a member of “the bald-headed community,” too! (“Curb Your Enthusiasm” reference!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
❤
LikeLike
In 2019, a group that identifies itself with the name of a cultural (or religious?) organization gave its annual award to Carol Tome who describes herself as transitioning from a Milton Friedman type of person. She is currently CEO of UPS, with a compensation package of $19-20 mil. a year.
In her acceptance speech for the National Human Relations Award she quoted Maya Angelou. “Develop enough courage to stand up for yourself then, stand up for someone else.” Her political donations have been overwhelmingly to Republican candidates (a little to Democrats) according to Intercept, 7-14-2023. Intercept’s article is about the UPS strike and the CEO.
The person presenting the award said, “When civic and business communities come together, it provides a message of hope.”
Less than 15% of the Jewish demographic votes Republican. Tome’s award was conferred by the Atlanta Jewish Connection as reported by Atlanta Jewish Times 11-6-2019. One of the accolades Tome received at the event related her to Jewish values of Tzedakah and Tikkum.
There are intersections of politics, labor practices and religion/culture that merit discussion and highlighting when the richest 0.1% pat themselves on the back for compassion and attach their attitudes to their religions or cultures.
When silence is the response to hypocrisy, what does it tell society writ large?
LikeLike