The Virginia Democratic Party took a strong and well-informed stand in opposition to attacks on public schools.
It issued the following statement:
The Democratic Party of Virginia
Condemns the Right-Wing, Dark Money-Funded, Republican Agenda to Dismantle Public Education, Divert Public Education Funding to Private Education Management, and
Eliminate Critical Thinking and Evidence-based Curricula from America’s Public Schools
Whereas,
GOP leaders have for decades sought to dismantle public education by reducing public support to facilitate moving public funds from public to for-profit schools.
Rather than focusing explicitly on promoting privatization, the coordinated, right-wing, special-interest-bankrolled, decades-long effort has established such schemes as the annual “National School Choice Week” event and deployed “parent” groups such as “Moms for Liberty,” “Parents Defending Education” and the “Independent Women’s Forum” to make it appear that there is wide opposition to public school policies. Their current tactics are to attack public schools by opposing masking policies, remote learning, and evidence-based curricula; harassing school board members, administrators, and staff; and threatening to burn books. “School choice” is rooted in efforts to keep schools segregated by race, class, and disability.
Truthout wrote, “’Shock Doctrine author Naomi Klein predicted in March 2020 that COVID-19 presented an ideal opportunity for ‘disaster capitalism,’ a tactic pushed by school privatizers in the wake of the last financial crisis. She identified the global pandemic as a ‘shock,’ or disruptive event that global elites often use to introduce free-market ‘solutions’ that redistribute wealth upwards.” Vindicating Klein’s prediction, since the pandemic, a Koch-funded group produced an “Opportunity on Crisis” report listing numerous school privatization schemes.
Education is a multibillion-dollar market, and the private sector is eager to get its hands on those dollars. Shrinking public education also furthers the overarching Republican Party goal of drastically reducing the public sector overall. Privatization also significantly undermines teacher unions, thereby reducing the voice and power of teachers to affect the terms and conditions of their workplace. Unions are also a strong and active part of the Democratic base and hobbling them hobbles their capacity to support Democrats.
Corporate-focused extreme-right Republican leaders want to censor, control, and narrow the exposure of most students to the broad knowledge base that would enable them to analyze, understand and accurately evaluate, and manage the forces that affect their lives. They want to consign the masses of America’s children to for-profit, unregulated, unaccredited, tax-funded “schools,” with large classes of inexperienced staff or digital platforms with no teachers at all, designed to supply a less-educated, malleable citizenry and subservient labor pool. Meanwhile, the children of the financial and corporate elite are to be taught a broad, rich curriculum in small classes led by experienced teachers in exclusive private schools.
Preparing people for democratic citizenship was a major reason for the creation of public schools. The Founding Fathers maintained that the success of American democracy would depend on the competency of its citizens and that preserving democracy would require an educated population that could understand political and social issues, participate wisely in civic life, and resist tyrants. Early leaders proposed the creation of a more formal and unified system of publicly funded schools.
Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Above all things I hope the education of the common people will be attended to; convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty.” Jefferson further explained: “The object is to bring into action that mass of talents which lies buried in poverty in every country, for want of the means of development, and thus give activity to a mass of mind, which, in proportion to our population, shall be double or treble of what it is in most countries.”
In the 1830s, Massachusetts legislator Horace Mann advocated for the creation of public schools that would be universally available to all children, free of charge, and funded by the state. He emphasized that a public investment in education would benefit the whole nation by preparing students to obtain jobs that will strengthen the nation’s economic position and promote cohesion across social classes. Proponents later reasoned that public schools would not serve as a unifying force if private schools drew off substantial numbers of students, resources, and parental support from the most advantaged groups. To succeed, a system of common schooling would require children from all social classes, and educating children from different religious, and European ethnic backgrounds in the same
schools would also help them learn to get along. Despite its founding ideals, throughout the historical development of early public education, there was discrimination against access for girls, children of color, new immigrants, minority religious groups, children with disabilities and others. However, the founding rationale has guided the evolution of the public-school mission to promoting equity of access to all in the mid-20th century, addressing social needs after WW II and ensuring that all students receive a high-quality education in the 21st century.
The original reasons for public schools — preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying a diverse population, and promoting equity–remain relevant and urgent today. The Republican agenda to dismantle public education will reverse all of these.
Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin is facilitating this ongoing right-wing scheme of school privatization and blocking of evidenced-based curricula with his executive orders allowing parents to opt out of mask mandates in Virginia schools, and ending “the use of divisive concepts, including critical race theory, in public education.” Meanwhile, Virginia’s Democratic legislators are introducing and protecting legislation that supports and promotes public schools with enriched and broad curricula to prepare students for citizenship and work in the 21st century.
Most American parents, students, and teachers do not agree with this privatization and curricula-limiting scheme, and many are standing up for schools that protect kids’ health, teach the truth, and promote equality for all. Our democracy
requires informed citizens. Public education enables its citizens to develop their full potential, which enables our democracy to flourish. It enables individuals to learn and grow and creates a successful and prosperous society.
Therefore, be it resolved that the Democratic Party of Virginia:
1. Calls on local, state, and federal officials, within the purview of their offices and roles, to:
a. Investigate, expose, and prosecute all individuals and groups who deploy intimidation tactics, threats of violence and violence against school board members, administrators, teachers, and others;
b. Initiate a public campaign, including forums, social and other media, etc., to highlight the historical compact establishing universal primary and secondary public education as a necessity to prepare an informed citizenry for their role in a democracy; illuminate the accomplishments of many decades of public education and the benefit to our country’s democracy; and provide a platform for people, including doctors, scientists, business leaders, and religious leaders, to relate their stories of the public school teachers who were instrumental in their success;
c. Increase funding and support for public schools and educator, administrator, and staff compensation; and
d. Introduce legislation and support an enriched, broad, public-school curricula for all students in liberal arts, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and career and technical education.
2. Commends Officials at all levels, including democratically elected school boards, who implement and parents who support an enriched, broad, public-school curricula for all students in liberal arts, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and career and technical education.
3. Calls on grassroots activists and organizations to launch a campaign to expose the right-wing, special-interest funded, Republican agenda to dismantle public education, divert public education tax dollars to private management of public schools, and to eliminate critical thinking and evidence-based curricula from America’s public schools.
4. Calls on grassroots activists, organizations, community and faith groups, parents, and the public to support increased funding for public schools and educator, administrator, and staff compensation, and to support an enriched, broad, public-school curricula for all students in liberal arts, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and career and technical education.

Often, it can be difficult to see the consequences of one’s work. But stuff like this tells me that Diane’s commitment to public schools and work with the community she has gathered around her have had influence far beyond those who have read her books or who visit her blog regularly. Why? Network effects. You all will be familiar with the concept of the six degrees of separation, aka, the six degrees of Kevin Bacon. Same thing at work here. Her memes travel through the thought-o-sphere and change minds. My way of saying, thank you, Diane Ravitch and colleagues at NPE, for fighting the good fight to save our public schools.
LikeLike
Well thank you as well Diane but thank the MAGA Republicans also. Thank them for giving Democrats a set of _ _ _ _s.
It was easy for them to side with Rt Wing Neo Liberal Plutocrats who were funding their campaigns and attacking Public Schools. When those Plutocrats were not revealing themselves to be out right fascists. Plutocrats and oligarchs supporting the the American version of the SA. Who are attacking Public Schools ,Libraries , Minorities, Women rts. , marginalized groups like gays and Democracy itself.
And of course there are the self serving Plutocrats whose objection to Government Programs do not extend as far as their Government mandated monopolies and bailouts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
indeed
LikeLike
Exactly. Democrats for Education Reform need to pay attention to the people who vote for them rather than the people who fund them.
LikeLike
Joel,
You are right. The GOP’s radicalism might force neoliberal Dems back into the mainstream of the party. They have been seriously compromised by Obama-Duncan support for privatization. We see where that leads.
LikeLike
For years, billionaires poured money into state legislatures of both parties as well as Congress. Virginia is a great place to start having Democratic state legislators be, well, Democrats. May it spread. We’re all tired of Republicans versus Republicans Lite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Preach it, Brother LCT!
LikeLike
“Might?” Bwa-haa-haa! That was a good one.
LikeLike
Privatization benefits the wealthy and undermines all public services, and all public goods and services are under attack from the ultra-wealthy. Public education is an expression of democracy in action that must be preserved for future generations for all the reasons listed in this post.
In addition to Virginia some governors are stepping up to defend public education. While we were recently shocked by some of Tony Evers’ actions in Wisconsin, what was unknown is that he was negotiating with conservatives. He had to give something in order to get something in return.
In a deal Evers made, he fought for veto power, and in doing so, his deal is intended to protect public schools and increase funding in student funding at $325 for the next 400 years. Democrats need to get better at pushing back at the unreasonable demands of the right, and some creative Democrats realize they must become more wily in order to defend public education.https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/06/gov-evers-uses-special-wisconsin-veto-power-to-fund-public-schools/70386835007/
LikeLike
Democrats need to get better at pushing back at the unreasonable demands of the right
YES!!!!!
LikeLike
2 yeses
LikeLiked by 1 person
tres yeses
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is what has impressed me about Biden. He is very good at finding “work arounds” and “work withs”. It may not get us what seems anywhere near our goal, but it does-move us in the right direction. Good to know Evers is employing similar strategies. Used to be what any decent legislator of any ilk did.
LikeLike
This is the upside of experience, having an expert understanding of legislation, and understanding what to do when. It’s also very different from “running a business.” It’s one of the big reasons we admire people like Raskin, Porter, Schiff, AOC, Whitehouse, and even Ravitch, just to name a few. Seeing Biden’s understanding of when and how to use political capital is THE lesson of political behavior (and the one most people do not understand). What impresses me and you also frustrates me. I wish he would add education to his political arsenal. But we’ve all been wishing for someone like that our whole lives.
LikeLike
Too many in our electorate simply do not value competence. Charisma rules the day at the expense of experience required to work in our representative quagmire. Trump was the result of a general fascination with celebrity and stagecraft. Once conservative operatives learned that worked with Reagan they neglected to see that Reagan actually had experience governing. It pains me after every election when the media starts proposing the next star who might consider running to carry the nuclear football. We get what we vote for.
LikeLike
I am listening to the daily German news and it was announced today that Erdogan has agreed to support Ukraine’s membership for NATO. This is a great example of leadership leading. If you think the U.S. and Biden had nothing to do with this, well…we’ll leave it at that. We may never know. That’s presidential leadership. They do much we know nothing about and it will take decades of historians to go through records to verify. The pinnacle of political power is having to take credit or deny things one is responsible for.
Let’s compare how the Idiot would have handled this. He (and I use the term advisedly) would take credit, splash it all over whatever and “journalists” would report it as fact.
LikeLike
He also might have seen it as a strongman “caving.” How he could manage to claim any role in promoting NATO,…but he would! Never a lost opportunity to posture.
LikeLike
Trump would have followed Putin’s orders and banned Ukraine from NATO
LikeLike
If effective propaganda begins,
where critical thinking ends,
what “critical thinking”, is
being eliminated?
What part of
“evidence-based curricula”,
defines critical thinking?
What part of the complicity,
required for testing abuse,
defines “critical thinking”?
When did the “full potential” of
the electorate, undermine the
power of the appointed,
UNelected cabal calling the
shots?
LikeLike
The economic juggernaut that was the United States in the 20th century was due to our public schools. Were our schools perfect? No. Did everyone benefit? No. However, economic prosperity was the rule for a burgeoning middle class and a more democratic union. Horace Mann proved to be quite prophetic in this regard. Women’s suffrage, the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s, going to the moon, none of these things would have been possible without a literate entrepreneurial society. A minority actively denied this success to pursue wealth and power. The right wing corporate assault on the public schools has been front and center for decades because they realize their dominance depends on an ignorant citizenry. Good for Virginia! All other blue states need to make such declarations. Local, state, and federal governments all need to understand our well being and democracy depend on it.
LikeLike
Share the Virginia Democratic party’s statement with your own state Dem party.
LikeLike
On it!
LikeLike
Not the main point above, and not that this will change a thing, but we’ve got to get away from this “red/blue state” crap. It’s a Tim Russert invention because his description of map he showed in his never-ending horserace, bothsiderism that happened to show the states in a red/blue graphic. It has literally no other meaning and now it’s become a shorthand to further distort political reality into an either/or, black/white, or in this case, red/blue simpleton’s simplicity.
In many nations around the world, some colors are associated with political parties. This goes back centuries, not to some random Meet the Press episode. Red is the color of the left and always has been except for the Russert-ized US. The reason Nazis chose red for one of their prominent colors for two reasons: first, they hoped it would fool some on the left to become interested in them, secondly because they wanted the association of the color with the Left to be meaningless. Black is identified with the right. So merging it with red had specific meaning, a dogwhistle of sorts. Yellow is identified with economic libertarianism. Green with environmentalism. So in parliamentary nations, coalitions are referred to by their various colors so that people have a short hand understanding of the basic stances.
The idea that a red/blue divide is nonsense is because we all know about the urban/suburban/rural divide that exists in this nation. You will find parts of Birmingham, AL and Little Rock, AR that are much more liberal than many places in NY, CA, or OR. We’ve got to quit using that shorthand. It is never helpful.
LikeLike
I agree. It’s become a simplistic means to identify a progressive perspective. Being a Southerner who has lived in progressive cities, I too am troubled by the misrepresentation. I will be more careful in the future. So states led by Democrats therefore, need to get off of their asses and engage with Republican dominated states to win the argument.
LikeLike
I think it’s hilarious that Republicans embrace red as their party color since it was always the color of Soviet Communism.
LikeLike
The corollary is that the decline of America in the 21st century can be trace to our abandonment of public schools. No one predicts this century will be “an American” one. The current trends in education only confirm this.
LikeLike
👍👍👍
Thank you, Diane!
LikeLike
Reading this twice in a row almost made my head explode. What is the purpose of this statement? If it is to educate and motivate people who are ignorant of these issues to do something, this gets a 1 on a scale of 10. A big fat F. This is clumsy language designed to preach to the converted (and quite poorly at that) with late-to-the-party CYA, and it’s solution is to go to a 1960s civic textbook outline of political activism. It’s no wonder we are losing if this is something that is supposed to make us happy.
When TF has the VA Democratic Party ever made a clear statement about education as a priority? Did they do anything to promote Northum? Any substantive responses to Youngkin? When has the DNC or any state party made education issues easily understandable? They are just recycling the same old confusing, easily mocked, easily misdefined garbage Democrats always have.
It isn’t until the 10th paragraph (as post was printed) that they get to the goddamn point. And the first paragraph says nothing: “GOP leaders have for decades sought to dismantle public education by reducing public support to facilitate moving public funds from public to for-profit schools.” Blah, blah, blah. It focuses on envy, not purpose. And instead of say, “we are going to do…and here’s how you can get involved to help,” it says, “here’s some stuff that’s bleeding obvious, but we’re not going to do it, it’s up to you.”
Democrats have never taken an unequivocal stand against the forces that would destroy public education. What is happening in public education today is in no way how many people remember it. Or, on the other hand, it never was or is the failure it is constantly reported to be. Instead, old stereotypes hold back reform, both pro and con. Any positive view of this statement show how beaten and desperate we have become. Just because they admit a few things we’ve literally known for more than a decade doesn’t make it heroic or positive. It’s a tiny bandaid for a multitude of wounds.
LikeLike
I think this statement provides an inkling of what needs to happen. That wisp of what might be should we grab the moment. Yes, the recent history of the Democratic establishment in public education is not good. However, the only possibility to overcome the movement toward privatization requires a first step of bringing the Democratic Party back to power. The next step is to make them aware of the errors of their ways and to require that act accordingly.
LikeLike
Democrats tend to show support for unions and public education during an election cycle. and their promises often get lost when elected. They may improve funding somewhat, but they take money from privatizers that continue to undermine public education. We need to change the status quo in which public schools continuously to lose ground.
LikeLike
Forgot to complete one thought about burying the lede, which in this case is: “The original reasons for public schools — preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying a diverse population, and promoting equity–remain relevant and urgent today. The Republican agenda to dismantle public education will reverse all of these.”
Here’s the problem with it as written; “preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying a diverse population, and promoting equity” assumes these are goals the broader population shares. As we all know here, about 45-50% of the American population does not agree those should be national goals. Assuming this issue “remain(s) relevant and urgent today” is not something they desire at all. We can all agree that the republican agenda is to kill public education to make it a profit center.
The disconnect we have here are goals based on false assumptions about opposition. Going backwards, if Democrats don’t publicly state they have been complicit with republicans on destroying public education without having them repent their sins publicly, loudly, and expressed in legislation, they have a losing proposition by trying to blame it solely on republicans. And since we know Democrats do not have a collective spine to do so, that argument is gone.
Who, outside of the small readership here, would claim that public education “remain(s) relevant and urgent” as an issue? I know of no one outside of this group that would claim so. Therefore, the second job Democrats could do is to run a disciplined public education (writ very large) campaign to raise awareness of “preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying a diverse population, and promoting equity.” This could finally discipline the party to have a coherent message from local through federal politics and run positive campaigns instead of losing reactive ones. We are deep doo-doo and the DNC seems to have no idea why. republicans have the lies to explain their version of why very effectively. Of course they have more fertile ground, both figuratively and literally.
LikeLike
“Who, outside of the small readership here, would claim that public education “remain(s) relevant and urgent” as an issue? I know of no one outside of this group that would claim so.”
I consider this to be one of the greatest challenges that has existed far longer than this current age of privatization. The media sphere tends to report on public schools as if education is something we do rather than achieve. After years of serving families and students I think public education is critical for getting us beyond this partisan and self destructive rancor that challenges our democracy as a tool for reinforcing local communities. We will not be able to overcome the societal challenges we face without public schools. If privatization wins out, we will become more divided between the haves and have nots than we are today. A true recipe for disaster.
LikeLike
GregB writes: “Here’s the problem with it as written; ‘preparing people for jobs and citizenship, unifying a diverse population, and promoting equity’ assumes these are goals the broader population shares. As we all know here, about 45-50% of the American population does not agree those should be national goals. Assuming this issue ‘remain(s) relevant and urgent today’ is not something they desire at all. We can all agree that the republican agenda is to kill public education to make it a profit center.”
I think you have hit it on the head, so to speak; though I think the “jobs” before “citizenship” thing is a bit of a tell.
That said, I don’t think it’s ONLY that 45-50% . . . do not agree. It’s that in their fuzzy way of thinking, many DO think they agree with such national goals even though the name “public education” has been demonized.
But from what I can tell, it’s merely a rhetorical agreement . . . a bunch of bumper-sticker sounds-good concepts . . . that their leaders’ and others’ narratives and performances regularly defy. What we (for instance most on this site) mean by those goals, as would be concretely manifest in public education, differs considerably, in quality, scope, and degree (to say the least).
Also, Biden’s attempt to quash the freedom of misinformation campaign coming from social platforms is already being mangled as if he is going against the First Amendment. In Diane’s original post here, however, the Jefferson quote and the stuff on Horace Mann still are what grounds the whole idea of public schools and deserve repeating:
(Jefferson) “’Above all things I hope the education of the common people will be attended to; convinced that on their good sense we may rely with the most security for the preservation of a due degree of liberty.’ Jefferson further explained: ‘The object is to bring into action that mass of talents which lies buried in poverty in every country, for want of the means of development, and thus give activity to a mass of mind, which, in proportion to our population, shall be double or treble of what it is in most countries.’”
“In the 1830s, Massachusetts legislator Horace Mann advocated for the creation of public schools that would be universally available to all children, free of charge, and funded by the state. He emphasized that a public investment in education would benefit the whole nation by preparing students to obtain jobs that will strengthen the nation’s economic position and promote cohesion across social classes. Proponents later reasoned that public schools would not serve as a unifying force if private schools drew off substantial numbers of students, resources, and parental support from the most advantaged groups. To succeed, a system of common schooling would require children from all social classes, and educating children from different religious, and European ethnic backgrounds in the same schools would also help them learn to get along.
“Despite its founding ideals, throughout the historical development of early public education, there was discrimination against access for girls, children of color, new immigrants, minority religious groups, children with disabilities and others. However, the founding rationale has guided the evolution of the public-school mission to promoting equity of access to all in the mid-20th century, addressing social needs after WW II and ensuring that all students receive a high-quality education in the 21st century.”
LikeLike
Excellent observation of order of “jobs and citizenship.”
LikeLike
I think offering quality public education is an essential component for a democratic society, particularly one that is a polarized as this one. We need to offer access and opportunity to all, not just a few. Divisive charters and vouchers run the risk of driving people into the realm of the like-minded including those anarchists that would prefer to blow up the federal government and start over with fascism. Public schools are more tolerant of diverse people and thought.
LikeLike
Public schools bring together students from a wide variety of backgrounds. They learn to live and work with others who are not like them. That’s what’s needed in a society as diverse as ours.
LikeLike
It is simply pathetic that the Democratic Party has been unable or unwilling to defend the public schools that 90% of us attended.
LikeLike
FINALLY!! Thank you Virginia Democratic Party for having the courage to speak up and say what has been needed for the last 20+ years. After a 40 year career as a public school teacher and administrator I have observed this movement to dismantle public education in our country. The Republicans have been very aggressive in their mission to privatize every aspect of the educational process while the Democrats have been nearly silent. This dismantling of our public school systems has been going on since Reagan decided to allow vouchers for alternative schools which has morphed into spending public education money on private schools. What happened to the separation between church and state? Where have the Democrats been all this time? What have they been doing while our democracy has been slipping away piece by piece through the redistribution of public money for education, book banning, demands for teaching an alternate history, basing curricula on misogynistic and racist principles, and designing instruction focused on standardized testing. What happened to teaching critical thinking skills, to teaching skills to analyze propaganda, to recognize fact from fiction, truth from mendacity, to teaching skills that foster creativity and innovation? If these concepts were actively taught in every school, like public schools have done throughout my career, America would continue having the most innovation population on the planet. Instead, teachers are being forced to become so restrictive in their teaching that they are strangling the creative minds of the youth. Democrats! Speak up! Start doing something! Don’t let our country fail and our democracy be dismantled. Fight to save it like the Democratic Party in Virginia is doing. Their condemnation needs to be replicated in all 50 states in our nation. If Democrats stay silent, our country will no longer be a world leader. It’s time to speak up and fight for the future of our country and for our democracy.
LikeLike
Well said, Ms. Ramberg!
LikeLike
“After a 40 year career as a public school teacher and administrator ”
Thanks for the former. . . my condolences on the latter.
LikeLike
“If Democrats stay silent, our country will no longer be a world leader.”
Don’t give a rat’s patoot about “Murica #1”.
The world would be a far better place if America gave up on being #1 (whatever that may mean). Being the world leader in death and destruction is not a good thing.
LikeLike
Obviously this post has hit a sore spot with me. As one who once made his living at creating grassroots constituencies for issues that seemingly had none, I am frustrated to death with the role public education policy does not play in Washington. We won’t be able to begin to fix the assaults taking place at the state level until a few things happen at the federal level.
Public education as it exist today does not in any way resemble the public education adults remember today. Those who have fond memories of schooling and want to support their local schools rarely realistically envision the good memories of past with the realities of today. The fond memories of the teacher(s) who inspired them are hardly compatible with the memories today’s students will have. The teachers they will remember were very likely working against or outside of the system they were forced to teach in. Students will not remember teachers who teach prepackaged, schedule and test-driven classes because they will never get to know who their teachers really are. The fantasies of parents and the public are feeding the reality.
Democrats must repent openly and honestly. Cory Booker would be a good start. They can all look to a certain virtual living room to see how it’s done.
The fact is that in a world of Washington gridlock and partisanship there have been two overwhelmingly bipartisan issues: military spending and degradation of public education through privatization, testing, treating teachers like line workers, and insufficient funding. We expect it from republicans, we need to call it out publicly and embarrass Democrats.
New coalitions have to built around new political rhetoric that informs and motivates rather than inflame and divide. They do not exist now. Friends of public education need the beneficiaries of public education to speak up and engage in public education. What infuriates me about the VA Dem Party statement is that never states what its point is. It’s pure CYA and nothing else (look it up on Google, Duane).
A great opportunity is being missed by NPE to take a lead in changing the tone, building new coalitions, and educating Congress and the administration this October. There will be a gathering of the most articulate defenders of public education alive today in the United States. The planning for what they must be doing between now and after the meeting should have been done by now.
LikeLike
Democrats must repent openly and honestly. Cory Booker would be a good start. They can all look to a certain virtual living room to see how it’s done.
Amen to that!
LikeLike
Greg,
Please do not mock my AIIDS handicap! (Don’t bother to google it because you won’t find what that psychological/educational acronym stands for even though it will be included in the DSM-X). Besides I know what CYA stands for–Catholic Youth Association.
LikeLike
😂 If I know the definition of adminimal, you better believe I know AIIDS!
LikeLike
“Cory Booker would be a good start.” Absolutely! He wanted to make Newark a charter capital and he foisted Cami Anderson as Newark Superintendent..
LikeLike
Most people don’t spend much time on philosophical discussions about anything much less education beyond, “Are my kids getting a “good” education.” Public schools have done that job to the satisfaction/expectations of most people. They can leave the job to their local schools and get on with their lives, the things that they have more direct agency or responsibility Normal life occupies a wide bandwidth. Pushing people to spend their energies/attention on any activity not directly related to what they see as essential for them requires an almost religious devotion to pursuing their “cause.”
LikeLike
Cx: responsibility for.
LikeLike
I was recently made aware of this guy doing excellent (if long) deep dives into the hypocrisy of the cult. Again, this is long, but it’s remarkably substantive.
LikeLike
Money should follow the children, and the parents can pick the schools that educate, not indoctrinate. Awwww Greg B admires losers like the Bartender AOC, who has been a disaster. Schiff, 74 time Epstein flight pedophile liar who literally made up a hoax for 3 years.
NYC DOE is a disgusting shit show 250,000 kids left because of dem policies such as masking, vaccines, sexualized books, trans readings, literally no critical thinking just indoctrination, trans and gay teachers pushing their pronouns, losers!
LikeLike
Dude, it’s clear, you’re either hitting the sauce pretty hard on Sunday morning, or you are in desperate need of help.
Maybe both.
LikeLike
I think the importance of the Virginia Democratic Party’s statement on public education is clear. And from my point of view, appreciated and directly on target. I mean, seriously, how do you quibble with this?
“Preparing people for democratic citizenship was a major reason for the creation of public schools. The Founding Fathers maintained that the success of American democracy would depend on the competency of its citizens and that preserving democracy would require an educated population that could understand political and social issues, participate wisely in civic life, and resist tyrants. Early leaders proposed the creation of a more formal and unified system of publicly funded schools.”
Virginia’s legislative elections occur in November, and control of the Virginia General Assembly — and what does or does not come out of it — is at stake.
Remember, Youngkin got elected on the basis of a racist lie — that Critical Race Theory permeated Virginia’s public schools. As the NY Times explained,
” the past half-century of American political history shows that racially coded attacks are how Republicans have been winning elections for decades…Youngkin dragged race into the election, making his vow to ‘ban critical race theory’ a centerpiece of his stump speech and repeating it over the closing weekend — Race is the elephant in the room.”
UVA political analyst Larry Sabato described the Youngkin Critical Race Theory strategy this way:
“The operative word is not critical.And it’s not theory. It’s race. What a shock, huh? Race. That is what matters. And that’s why it’s sticks. There’s a lot of, we can call it white backlash, white resistance, whatever you want to call it. It has to do with race. And so we live in a post-factual era … It doesn’t matter that [CRT] isn’t taught in Virginia schools. It’s this generalized attitude that whites are being put upon and we’ve got to do something about it. We being white voters.”
White voters — especially low-education white voters — responded. Youngkin won 76 percent of non-college graduate whites. And Youngkin got way more of the non-college white women votes (75 percent) than McAuliffe. Check the exit polls:
WHITE WOMEN COLLEGE GRADS
VA 2020: 58% Biden, 41% Trump
VA 2021: 62% McAuliffe, 38% Youngkin
WHITE WOMEN NON-COLLEGE
VA 2020: 56% Trump, 44% Biden
VA 2021: 75% Youngkin, 25% McAuliffe
A Roanoke College poll in March of this year noted that,
“Large majorities of Virginians oppose removing books from public schools (73%) and public libraries (81%) for these reasons, though partisan gaps exist here, as well. There is a 24-point gap (85% Democrats, 61% Republicans) between Democrats and Republicans in their opposition to removing books from public schools, and a 13-point gap (86% Democrats, 73% Republicans) in their opposition to removing books from public libraries.”
And a Washington Post poll in April found that while Youngkin is pushing for more tax cuts from the state budget surplus for corporations and businesses and top earners, the overwhelming majority of Virginians think “the surplus should go toward increased spending for schools, with 87 percent in favor.”
The Dems are – apparently, and rightfully so, intending to make public education a very major campaign issue. Because, on the other side, Youngkin will continue his lies about public schools and charter schools and vouchers. Interesting, Youngkin just appointed Emily Anne Guillickson as deputy secretary of education. Gullison, a Teacher for America alum, comes to Virginia from Arizona, where she has been an advocate for charters, open enrollment across school zones, and vouchers.
As various media have reported (and Diane noted here a few days ago),
“The system of universal vouchers enacted by Republican lawmakers is going to cost Arizona taxpayers $900 million this coming school year – 63% over what lawmakers put into the budget just a month ago…three out of every four of the students who have applied for the new universal vouchers to date already were going to private schools on their parents’ dime. Now their tuition will be borne by taxpayers…Several Republicans who support vouchers said they were not concerned about the price tag…Rep. Jacqueline Parker, R-Mesa, said in a Twitter post that $900 million is ‘not enough yet,’ calling it ‘a drop in the bucket to the other $7+ billion spent on the useless indoctrination camps that are ‘government schools.’ ”
THIS is what Youngkin has in mind for Virginia public education.
Read the interview with this woman, and then ask yourself, should she even be deputy secretary of a Twilight fan club?
https://educationevolution.org/breaking-down-barriers-to-change-laws-in-arizona-with-emily-anne-gullickson/
LikeLike
I neglected to point out this important fact:
“With the three appointments, the nine-person board will now be made up of eight Youngkin appointees. Anne Holton, who was first appointed by former governor Terry McAuliffe in 2017, will be the only member appointed by a Democratic governor.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/07/08/youngkin-board-education-appointments/
LikeLike
I find it interesting that this is happening in VA—which chose to retain its Standards of Learning rather than adopt Common Core, if I remember correctly.
LikeLike