Scott Maxwell, opinion writer for the Orlando Sentinel, has some advice for Florida’s Republican legislators: See “Kinky Boots,” playing in Orlando. The show was a huge hit on Broadway. It won multiple awards. Just promise not to close it down.
To say that Florida’s GOP lawmakers are obsessed with drag queens is like saying Jabba the Hutt has a few extra pounds.
These guys have a preoccupation with cross-dressers that would confound Dr. Ruth.
While the state is plagued with problems ranging from a teacher shortage to skyrocketing insurance rates, GOP lawmakers have assigned anti-drag-queen legislation to, not one, not two, but five different legislative committees.
They’ve spent hours holding hearings, taking testimony and staging debate.
During one two-hour hearing, Brevard County Rep. Randy Fine tried to explain why he wanted to make it a first-degree misdemeanor to admit minors to shows that appeal to, as his bill says, “shameful” interests.
“What is ‘shameful’?” asked a Democratic colleague, wondering if Fine could define the word he wanted to enshrine in Florida statutes as a basis for arresting people.
Fine responded: “Um … um … [Eight seconds of silence] … I think that it again, that is things that are … I dunno … I mean, again, you can look these things up in the dictionary.”
Well said, Representative.
Florida theaters keep watchful eye on Legislature’s drag drama
It’s obvious drag queens fluster some of these folks. But instead of trying to rewrite state statutes in ways even they struggle to explain, I have a suggestion: Take a field trip.
Come see the Orlando Shakes’ latest production, “Kinky Boots.”
It’s a funny, heart-warming and family-friendly show that won Tony awards when it debuted on Broadway.
It features oodles of the drag queens you’re so interested in. But it also features characters who, like you guys, claim to be offended by drag queens — but who come to understand that, just because someone is different from you, it doesn’t make them bad.
That’s a lesson many of us learned in kindergarten or from Mr. Rogers. Well, think of “Kinky Boots” as kindergarten with a rock soundtrack. Or Mr. Rogers in bright red, 6-inch heels.
Now, if you do come see the show, you have to promise something: You won’t try to censor it or shut it down.
I don’t think anyone anywhere ever has. “Kinky Boots,” after all, is well-known and family friendly with songs by Cyndi Lauper. “The Book of Mormon” is way more raunchy.
But we know how some of you like to ban things that espouse ideas you dislike — books, history lessons, corporate diversity classes — here in the “Free State of Florida.”
More troubling, we’ve already seen you target another one of Orlando’s cultural gems, the Orlando Philharmonic, after its foundation let drag queens rent out its theater for a raunchier show.
Gov. Ron DeSantis objected to alleged lewdness in front of kids. And even though undercover state agents reported “… agents did not witness any lewd acts …” in Orlando, DeSantis’ business-regulation division is still trying to yank the nonprofit theater’s liquor license.
So if you come see “Kinky Boots,” you have to promise to just sit and listen.
There, you’ll not only be able to see men dressed as women, you might benefit from the messages in this award-winning Broadway musical.
It’s the tale of a shoe-making company in England that falls upon hard times and discovers a path to financial success by making footwear for a niche market — drag queens. (Capitalism!)
It’s also about how some of the factory-workers who mocked and teased the drag queens didn’t really understand what they were mocking.
My wife and I saw the two-hour show Thursday night in a packed theater that gave a standing ovation to the hard-working professional actors. I promise it’s more entertaining than the two-hour legislative hearing.
In that hearing, Fine told members his concern was children. His bill would assess fines and charges against venues and individuals who admit minors to a show that “Predominantly appeals to a prurient, shameful, or morbid interest” and “Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community of this state as a whole …”
“Clear as mud,” one Democrat responded.
Democratic lawmakers also wondered why Fine only wanted to crack down on “live” performances — and not movies that show hardcore sex and gory violence, which parents can take their kids to see in Florida.
Fine knew he had no good response to that. So he suggested legislators could add criminal penalties for movie theaters, too. But, of course, they haven’t. It’s just the drag queens that have them so … interested.
At one point, Pasco County Republican Rep. Kevin Steele said he wouldn’t take his kids to a drag show before adding: “Obviously, that’s a personal choice.”
It was a bizarre thing to say, considering Steele supported the bill that would outlaw precisely that — the parental right to make that choice.
I obviously don’t think children should see anything pornographic. But this bill goes way beyond that, trying to impose nebulous, overly broad, opinion-based standards and only focuses on live performances.
“This isn’t a clinic on Constitutional Law,” Fine said. Boy, was that the truth.
There are many issues more worthy of lawmakers’ time. If these politicians truly cared about children and families, for example, they’d focus on ending the decade-long wait faced by thousands of children with disabilities who are desperate for help.
Instead, they’re planning more hearings, meetings and votes on HB 1423, the so-called “Protection of Children” act — the drag-queen bill.
So if these politicians are going to bypass addressing the truly pressing problems facing the state, they might as well enjoy a quality production that features some of the very performers they’re so obviously obsessed with.
And maybe learn something in the process.
smaxwell@orlandosentinel.com
Come to think of it, didn’t Rhonda Santa look just fetching in her white go-go boots? Stand back, Nancy Sinatra!
Saw Kinky Boots last summer at our local summer theater and found it hilarious and heartwarming. Story line is offbeat but funny and not at all offensive. The drag portrayals were both serious and humorous and fit the show perfectly. Highly recommended.
I completely agree- the folks in the Florida legislature really do need to see this show and stay for the whole thing.
Diane Ravitch continues to be obsessed by drag queen issues.
LOL. Certain Repugnican politicians are obsessed by drag queen issues. Diane Ravitch is obsessed with the rights of free people to freedom of speech and to pursuit of liberty and happiness.
Big difference. Do you grok, or do we have to go over this again?
Exactly
cx: to freedom of speech and assembly and to pursuit of liberty and happiness
Unlike the DeStalinist version of the Taliban Morality Police
Yes, I believe in artistic freedom. Drag queens are performers.
And Diane is obsessed with protecting and patronizing good theatre.
Bethany-
Do you think media is “obsessed” with omitting right wing religion from their reporting about abortion and gay rights?
Say “Yeah” to a future in which people are free to be who they are and ___ to the troglodytes who would take us backward. Believe me, you’ll have a LOT more fun. LOL.
(Being those Pugs must be its own punishment. Hey, Pugs. Unfrown yourselves.)
I wonder if a book that said it was okay to eat your children would be banned in Florida.
Deuteronomy 28:53-63
“53 “You will eat your children, the flesh of your sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you during the siege and hardship your enemy imposes on you.”
There are nine more passages if you are interested in more context.
https://www.biblestudytools.com/csb/deuteronomy/passage/?q=deuteronomy+28:53-63
Maxwell summarized the issue, “ban things that espouse ideas you don’t like.” So, the readers are led to the conclusion that each person decided through his or her own thought processes that he or she didn’t like drag performances? Right wing religion is immaterial and not worth mentioning in this context? Church politicking against gay rights can be dismissed as chimera. The preceding perception would help to explain why the state Catholic Conferences’ extensive politicking that advances the GOP agenda is ignored by media.
I reviewed the Az Catholic Conference site today, after learning that Az. Republican state Rep. Liz Harris was expelled from the House. I was curious about her positions on issues and how she got elected.
The Az. Catholic Conference describes itself as serving Roman Catholics in the Western U.S. and it describes itself as the public policy arm of the dioceses of Phoenix, Tucson and Gallup and the Holy Protection of Mary Byzantine Catholic Eparchy of Phoenix. Btw- the website of the Holy Protection… identifies its sponsor as “online casino.” The Holy Protection… site includes praise/PR for the business. The provided link to the casino site, brings up a webpage with the headline, Casinos India.
The Az. Catholic Conference site tells readers that it doesn’t endorse candidates and that the answers to questions they asked Representatives like Liz Harris are provided only to inform voters. The questions can be found on the post related to the Nov. 3 election in 2020. I concluded that Harris’ answers to the highly selective questions e.g. abortion, tax money for private schools, same sex marriage, etc. mainly jibe with the USCCB’s positions. Liz’s BA is from a small private Catholic college in NYC, the College of Mount St. Vincent.
Tangentially, Wikipedia describes Ron Watkins as listing his residential address for voter registration as a property that reporters allege is owned by Liz Harris. Various media alleged that Ron Watkins created QAnon.
Heck, In Shakespeare’s time, women were not allowed to be on the stage. Men had to dress as women. I wonder what the GOP would have done if they lived in that era.
In Texas, Greater Tuna was a staple everyone in Austin came to see in the 80s. It would be banned now. So ridiculous.
That was hilarious! Thanks for the news from Greater Tuna!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Tuna
That’s fascinating, Sara!
Republican Rudy Giuliani used to do terrific drag.
Yes, Guiliani did a skit with Trump where Trump grabbed his breasts.
The next Republican President can add Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan to SCOTUS. Trump appointed him as a judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. He’s from Louisiana. His Federalist Society views mirror those of Thomas, Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Alito.
Duncan won conservative Adrian Vermuele’s praise for scholarly acclaim. Duncan’s in the news for a speaking engagement at Stanford where students shouted him down. IMO, they should. before bringing a judge or legal scholar to campus, the first qualifying question that should be asked is, do you believe that man’s law governs or God’s law?
The pretense that the political right is remote from the powerhouse of the conservative Catholic church is a roadblock to preserving the rights of Americans.