Dr. Helen F. Ladd is one of the most eminent economists of education, possibly the most eminent. She has written important studies that document the importance of poverty in the lives of children and its impact on their educational outcomes. She has written critically about No Child Left Behind. And she has written international studies of school choice with her husband Edward Fiske, a veteran journalist.
I sponsor an annual lecture series on education at Wellesley College, my alma mater, and was delighted when Sunny Ladd, as she is known, accepted my invitation to be the first post-pandemic lecturer. She prepared this paper, which has been published by the National Education Policy Center.
She maintains that charter schools disrupt sound educational policy making.
This an overview of her important paper:
As publicly funded schools of choice operated by private entities, charter schools differ from traditional public schools in that they have more operational autonomy, their teachers are not public employees, and they are operated by nonprofit or for-profit private entities under renewable contracts. The main sense in which they are public is that they are funded by taxpayer dollars. This policy memo describes how charter schools disrupt four core goals of education policy: establishing coherent systems of schools, attending to child poverty and disadvantage, limiting racial segregation and isolation, and ensuring that public funds are spent wisely. The author recommends that policies be designed both to limit the expansion of charters and to reduce the extent to which they disrupt the making of good education policy.
Open the link and read it in full.

Charters are BAD. No one will ever convince me otherwise. We have seen over and over again how BAD Charters are. When will this lunacy end?
LikeLike
I love your posts. Can’t imagine how you read this much and stay in touch with all that’s going on. BUT check out starschool.org, a charter school that I support. I’d welcome your thoughts. regards, barbara martinsons
LikeLike
Looks like a wonderful place! Thanks for sharing this.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Too bad it’s a private school taking resources away from public school students.
LikeLike
Great piece!!! Thank you, Dr. Ladd!
LikeLike
Dr. Ladd makes some reasonable suggestions that will likely be ignored. The incentive to commodify education will continue to keep inspections, accountability and regulation out of the picture unless the public demands otherwise. There is so much money behind privatization that changes are unlikely as privatization is a “pay to play” scheme, and politicians will continue to protect the interests of their donors.
Racial isolation will likely continue as it is a feature of privatization, not an unintended consequence. I think some red states and perhaps some cities as well view placing poor, mostly minority students in separate and unequal schools to raise test scores. It is much easier to ignore a certain group of students if the system circumvents accountability. This move is not addressing the so-called problem. It merely transfers it to an unaccoutable location.
While privatization is generally associated with so-called choice, there is no choice when whole schools or districts are privatized. I cannot understand how this is not a violation of young people’s civil rights that are guaranteed in a public school, but not in a privately owned school. How can students be forced to give up the rights that are accorded to white students in public districts when tax dollars are used to fund both educations? How can states justify such a seizure of public funds when there is no evidence that such a radical change will result in improved education for young people?
Currently, in neighboring Escambia County, Florida, Warrington Middle School will become a charter school next school year due to low test scores. Charter Schools USA, a big GOP and DeSantis donor, will take over the contract to operate the school next year.
LikeLike
The question I keep considering is why are Black and Brown students, the very students for whom civil rights laws are supposed to protect, being forced out of the public schools that offer them guaranteed civil rights protections? Secondly, why is the federal government continuing to fund schools that fail to provide civil right protections to Black, Brown, ELLs, special education, LGBT and other vulnerable students? Why is the federal government complicit in circumventing its own pro-democratic federal laws, and, of course, how is this legal?
LikeLike
You make good points. I’ll add,
the backers of the charter school industry at the national level, for example, libertarians like Gates, employ high visibility Black spokespersons who have links to the civil rights movement of the past, sometimes present. It creates a veneer that effectively masks the theft of community assets and local democracy.
Hakeem Jeffries is Clyburn’s choice to replace Pelosi.
Then, there is the powerhouse of conservative religion which impacts legalization e.g. Liberty Counsel, Becket Law, and the Thomas More Society. State Catholic Conferences promote privatization to the state legislatures. SCOTUS drives decisions to the state level where wealthy libertarians are better able to eliminate and undermine citizen rights (and, the church gains tax dollars). Leonard Leo received an award from a Catholic organization for the successes of the Federalist Society.
LikeLike
“When will this lunacy end?”
It has been suggested that
“The proper cure requires
the proper diagnosis.”
DOCTOR Ladd belongs to the
top 5% of economists in
terms of research output.
In addition to her academic
positions, she is affiliated
with the Brookings Institution.
Is the diagnosis:
Fiscal disparities are
caused by what we
DON’T know.
Is the cure to offset
fiscal disparities,
know-that-“important papers”?
Again, the proper cure
follows the proper
diagonosis…
LikeLike
Establishing a coherent system of schools, attending to child poverty and disadvantage, eliminating segregation and isolation, and ensuring that education funds are spent wisely are the goals of public education. They are not the goals of the architects of the charter industry. Their goals are: eliminating a coherent system of schools to allow a competition for survival; dumping an unhealthy amount of work and stress on the victims of child poverty and disadvantage; using data to enhance segregation and isolation as part of the big competition for survival; and ensuring education funds are spent on the cheapest nonunion labor possible, related party transactions, $200 bottles of wine, private jets, and luxury box seats at San Antonio Spurs games.
LikeLike