In a new ruling, the Supreme Court struck down a New York State law that limited access to guns. The New York law requires that people seeking to carry a handgun outside their homes must obtain a permit and show “proper cause.” There are similar laws in California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Rhode Island.
To those who claimed in 2016 that it didn’t matter if Trump was elected, this is what Trump’s three appointees to the Supreme Court have done: required Maine to pay for discriminatory born-again religious schools; overturned gun controls in New York; and will probably overturn Roe v Wade in the next few days. Elections have consequences. The lesser of two evils is always preferable to Pure Evil. A candidate who is good but not perfect is preferable to one who is ignorant and bigoted.
The Supreme Court said Thursday that Americans generally have a right to carry a handgun outside the home for self-defense and that a New York law requiring special need for such a permit is too restrictive.
The vote was 6 to 3, with Justice Clarence Thomas writing for the majority and the court’s three liberals in dissent.
“The Second and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home,” Thomas wrote, saying New York’s requirement of a specific need to carry a weapon violates that right.
“The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not ‘a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.’ ” Thomas wrote, referring to a previous Supreme Court ruling. “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need.”
He was joined by the court’s conservatives: Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.
In dissent, Justice Stephen G. Breyer pointed to the nearly 300 mass shootings since January and to data showing that gun violence has surpassed car crashes as the leading cause of death among children and teens. The majority’s decision, he said, will make it more difficult for state lawmakers to take steps to limit the dangers of gun violence.
The Second Amendment allows states to “take account of the serious problems posed by gun violence,” wrote Breyer, who was joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. He added: “Many States have tried to address some of the dangers of gun violence … by passing laws that limit, in various ways, who may purchase, carry, or use firearms of different kinds. The Court today severely burdens States’ efforts to do so.”
The party that claims to be “right to life” authorizes easier access to weapons of death. More people will die because this ruling. Under this court, the only protected class is the pre-born or the unborn. The born are in big trouble.

Thomas’s opinion reads like it was written by the Unabomber.
LikeLike
Well said, Flerp.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Too bad RBG didn’t step down while Obama was in charge. Too bad he didn’t do a recess appointment for Garland.
LikeLike
Dienne,
I thought RBG made a grievous error by hanging on as long as she did.
When she died, she had had multiple bouts with cancer, and she was 89.
Why did she think she was immortal?
She should have stepped aside at the beginning of Obama’s second term, to protect her seat.
I think her vanity and acclaim got the best of her.
What she did was bad for the Court and the country.
LikeLike
Wow takes chutzpah. “Too bad RBG didn’t step down while Obama was in charge (because when I said that it didn’t matter who appointed Supreme Court justices in 2016, what I meant is that I wanted this to only be a 5-4 far right victory instead of a 6-3 far right victory).
The Supreme Court matters and those who said it did not in 2016 are to blame for this 6-3 decision. This decision would not be more acceptable if it were a 5-4 right wing victory, and it doesn’t excuse the choice that some people made when they were voting for who would fill that open seat in a 4-4 tie. They didn’t want the Democrat to choose who filled that open seat. They should own that choice.
The far right correctly knows that there is little difference between a far right 6-3 victory and a far right 5-4 victory. There IS a difference between a 5-4 far right victory and a 5-4 far right defeat. Those who voted AGAINST a Democrat filling the open seat when the Court was tied 4-4 caused this. RBG caused this decision to be a 6-3 far right victory instead of a 5-4 far right victory. The ones who voted against the Democrat are responsible for this being a right wing victory, period. Look in the mirror.
LikeLike
NYCPSP, I know your comment was not directed to me.
I have never joined the RBG fan club because her refusal to step down at the beginning of Obama’s second term was selfish. Her fan club frenzy went to her head. She thought she was irreplaceable. She should have stepped down when she was 85 and spent her remaining years educating the public. Instead Trump got three appointments to SCOTUS.
LikeLike
“My, my, my! Such a lot of guns around town and so few brains! You know, you’re the second guy I’ve met today that seems to think a gat in the hand means the world by the tail.”
Raymond Chandler, “The Big Sleep”
LikeLike
Reminds me of current gun ads that state, “Reclaim your manhood!”
The League of Women Voters of the US has an email out warning about guns being brought to polling places.
Our local online news source (actually, the source is sent throughout the Chicago metropolitan area & all the surrounding suburbs/ ran an ad for 2 election cycles touting their “Election Day Specials,” including all kinds of guns & mentioning that they had huge stocks of ammo.
What message does that send?
(I believe a great readers’ protest resulted, because the ads didn’t run the next election cycle, but Iwill be checking on June & November 2022.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
And the hits just keep coming. It’s disgusting, mind-numbing and totally discouraging. The SCOTUS keeps doing stupid, stupider and stupidest. Yes, as Diane says, elections have consequences; not voting, voting for the Greens, or voting GOP amounts to the same thing. The only viable alternative is to vote Democratic and the result was Ketanji Brown Jackson appointed to the SCOTUS. With the GOP we would have had yet another far right wing gun-loving religionist to the SCOTUS.
LikeLike
Religionists include Trump’s Jenna Ellis. The info. under the heading “Career” about her at Wikipedia is fascinating. She provides example of a self- appointed representative of Christian beliefs who has no shame.
Ellis must believe the part of her faith that tells her she is divinely guided to flip flop on issues like democracy, similar to Rusty Bowers.
LikeLike
Much rejoicing in the Kremlin. Vlad’s investment in his dog Trump has really paid off in going a long way toward destroying democracy in the United States.
And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.
LikeLike
Wow! This statement is bizarre: “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need”. I have been in numerous groups that have had to fill out requests and get governmental approval to assemble. Do these frightening 6 not read the constitution? Or worse, do they have no compunctions about lying?
LikeLike
States will still be able to require people to apply for permits, to pass background checks, and presumably to meet some level of training. The difference is that now every state will effectively be a “shall issue” state (where permits “shall” be issued unless some disqualifying circumstance exist), as opposed to a “may issue” state (where permits only issue if the applicant demonstrates a special need to carry).
LikeLike
FLERP!,
Thank you for this clarification. It’s an important nuance that will escape the hysterical commenters who don’t make the effort to get beyond the headlines or to access sources of information outside of their ideological comfort zones.
LikeLike
Rita Kinney
Perhaps you would like to compare the homicide rates in Shall issue cities to those in May issue cities .
.
Personally I am good with the decision. Nothing stops a bad Righty with a gun better then a good Lefty with a gun. I will be starting a Go Fund Me page for Antifa members. Previously they only were armed with Black Garb.
In fact I see no reason all Citizens can not walk the streets with AR15s across their chests and a Glock tucked in their waist.
Restrictions put in place at the OK Corral went overboard. But hell as long as the Capital District is included and the Streets in front of the Justices house are treated no different than the street in front of FLERPS house. I am good with it .
LikeLike
Joel, the gun decision apparently says that guns may be excluded from some very important places, like courtrooms.
Probably the NRA convention too.
LikeLike
Nuance? You mean like “Thomas’s opinion reads like it was written by the Unabomber”
Ha ha ha.
(Thomas’ opinion in this case is the Supreme Court Majority opinion, not incidentally)
LikeLike
SDP, you didn’t like that?
LikeLike
I didn’t say I didn’t like it.
But it contradicts the idea that Thomas and the majority have presented a defensible (to say nothing of “nuanced”) opinion.
LikeLike
Thank you for dispassionately explaining the intricacies of the law, FLERP. Greatly appreciated.
LikeLike
So, when does this court exchange its black robes for white ones with hoods?
LikeLike
Good question, Bob.
I need to now go puke.
LikeLiked by 1 person
same
LikeLike
Mr. Shepherd,
This comment is far beneath someone of your intelligence. This SCOTUS ruling may be unjustified, but it has nothing to do with the KKK.
LikeLike
The current SCOTUS is far beneath the Republic of the United States of America which was envisioned as a representative democracy.
LikeLike
It does! I think the decision was made to allow White Nationalist Religio- Fascists to go into liberal cities armed to the teeth. Prove me wrong. Let the games begin.
LikeLike
Unless of course you have physic powers that allow you to read the minds of the Supreme Imperial Wizard and his Grand Dragons you can not prove Bob wrong
LikeLike
The decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a template for undoing much of the enormous body of law dealing with unenumerated rights, including rights related to many of our most precious liberties, and Alito and his fellow conservative “justices” are quite aware of this, that they are staging a judicial coup. Sickening.
LikeLike
How can we justify restricting anything if we use their logic? Want to drive? No problem. You cannot restrict the right to drive a car. Want to be a surgeon? Anyone can cut people open. It’s called freedom.
LikeLike
Let freedumb ding-a-ling!
LikeLike
How about the freedom of a 10-year-old to go to school without being murdered by an insane teenager who was able, legally, to buy a military-style weapon? How about that child’s freedom?
Oh, sorry. Diane got it right. Already born children don’t matter.
LikeLike
The right to life until birth. After that the takers of life get a legal leg up. You poison the creek? It’s your land where you peed. You sell a nuke to a crazy man? Nukes don’t kill, people do.
LikeLike
The “right to life after death” is what these folks actually support.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And even then, only for the believers.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The don’t have a right to life either before or after death.
Just womb rights.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL
LikeLike
The nonbelievers don’t …
LikeLike
“The Right to Life”
(But only before birth and After death)
The right to life
Before and after
But earthly strife
Is key for Rapture
LikeLiked by 1 person
Decision after horrible decisions just keep oozing out from the halls of the Supreme Court.
The Opus Dei majority is also getting ready to gut Roe v. Wade, as well as the EPA and other administrative agencies.
It’s midnight in America.
LikeLike
Yup
Back to the future. Way, way, way back.
LikeLike
The Opus Dei majority.
Exactly
LikeLike
If the Second Amendment indeed guaranteed every citizen an unfettered right to have and carry any kind of weapon, then the Fourteenth Amendment would indeed forbid the states
from abdridging that right:
“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States”
But, notwithstanding the belief of the Supreme Majority and their sponsors, the NRA, the second Amendment does not make such a guarantee — certainly not literally and not even according to “original intent” interpretation.
As former Chief Justice Warren Burger (appointed by Richard Nixon) said
“The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies – the militia – would be maintained for the defense of the state…. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires.”
Not incidentally, Burger also said
“The gun lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American people by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”
LikeLike
yup
LikeLike
Recent rulings by the majority really make me wonder what (if anything) is being taught about the Constitution at (supposedly) “top” law schools like Harvard and Yale.
Are profs like Constitutional Law expert Lawrence Tribe really teaching people like John Roberts and Brett “Special” K that the second amendment “guarantees every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires”?
I find that very hard to believe but then again, I also find it hard to believe that someone like Roberts and K could get a law degree from one of those schools and have such an obviously poor understanding of the Constitution and the contemporaneous writings of the Framers.
LikeLike
If taught at one of those schools, I would be embarrassed by the ort of crap that is emanating from (the hind ends of?) alumni.
LikeLike
If this is the sort of garbage that passes for “Constitutional scholarship” at top law schools, I’d have to say there is no hope.
LikeLike
SCOTUS conservatives are graduates of colonialist schools like Notre Dame and the Ivy Leagues. D.C.’s Georgetown Catholic University graduates and employs influential right wingers e.g. Ilya Shapiro (Koch network).
It would be interesting to have been a fly on the wall for the experience of Ketanji Brown at the Ivy League school she attended.
There are too few state university grads in positions of power.
LikeLike
Since we know that SCOTUS justices are among the better legal minds in the country– not the best, but let’s say among the top 20% of a well-educated and experienced [except Coney-Barrett] group– we know that decisions like this one derive not from stupidity, nor inability to interpret the Constitution. That’s, in fact, how we know that this, and a number of such decisions over the last 2 decades, derive from mendacity, pride, sycophancy, vaingloriousness, anti-democratic ideology, and/ or the overweening arrogance to imagine they know better than the Founders what’s good for the country.
LikeLike
Ginny, and they have the nerve to call themselves “originalists.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bthree5
Yes, I realize they are just being disingenuous/deceptive (as indicated by my last couple comments below)
When I said I find it hard to believe,what I meant was “I don’t believe it”.
But they are producing crap whatever way you look at it.
And it IS nonetheless embarrassing that schools like Harvard and Yale are graduating these sorts of people.
LikeLike
Apparently the profs at those schools don’t have very good bullshit detectors.
Otherwise, they would see through these people.
LikeLike
Or maybe the profs are themselves full of it.
LikeLike
Anyone who would award a law degree to Brett “I Like Beer” K. should have their head examined for the presence of a brain.
LikeLike
It’s worth noting that the Thomas wrote “The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not ‘a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.’
Though the decision was in response to a concealed carry law, Thomas’ opinion would appear to apply to any instance of carrying a gun in public.
And if one assumes as Thomas does, that that is a Constitutional right, then the Fourteenth Amendment would mean that a state can not make ANY law to abridge that right.
No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States”
The part of the ruling that said “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need” is effectively irrelevant IF the state can’t make ANy law to abridge the privileges of citizens of the united States AND one assumes (as Thomas and the other members of the majority have ) that the “Constitutional right to bear arms in public for self defense” is among those Constitutionally guaranteed privileges.
In other words, though the Majority want everyone to believe this is restricted to concealed carry, the wording indicates something much more far reaching: that any law (concealed carry or not) which abridges the right (as viewed by the Supreme Majority) of a citizen to carry a gun is unconstitutional.
LikeLike
And it would appear to reach much further afield than simply to the case of having to show a special need for a permit.
If bearing arms in public is viewed as a sacrosanct constitutional right, then it would seem to follow that ANY abridgement (even denying a person a permit for lack of gun safety training) is unconstitutional.
LikeLike
The expansive wording in this case is no mere accident.
It’s quite purposeful.
The Supreme Majority make it seem they are ruling on a very restricted thing (in this case the constitutionality of requiring people to show a special need for a concealed carry permit) , but they word their ruling in such a way that allows them to expand considerably on the ruling in the future.
LikeLike
I completely agree, SDP, that is totally where they’re heading. They’re not there yet, but they’re signaling the direction. Toward a place that says, these are unabridgeable rights– so states can’t modify them, and these [i.e., abortion] aren’t rights at all—so states can’t accommodate them. All based on their faux cherry-picking “originalist” interpretation of the Constitution, which renders that document unable to respond to conditions in the US 225 yrs later. That last one– these aren’t rights at all—means overturning any number of decisions in recent years, returning us to the backwards status quo of many decades ago.
LikeLike
I’m still not exactly sure who this benefits. Ok, so people who buy handguns can legally just carry them around?
LikeLike
Follow the money.
LikeLike
Clovis,
I assume what the gun decision means is that people don’t need to ask for a permit to carry a gun outside of their home–for defensive purposes, of course. Who benefits? Gun dealers. Who loses? More guns on the street mean more deaths. An impulsive anger will produce a killing instead of a fist fight.
LikeLike
It’s always better to ask for forgiveness than for permission. Especially when it comes to shooting total strangers on the street.
Ask for forgiveness
And you will receive
Ask for permission
And you will just grieve
LikeLike
Kyle Rittenhouse learned that.
As did George Zimmerman.
LikeLike
Clovis-
Republicans on SCOTUS render decisions that protect colonialism.
The jurists gained appointment via a network that is rabidly racist and particularly threatened by young Black men. The Stand Your Ground law from ALEC gives permission to kill. We live in a racist society so the judicial system favors Whites in situations where Black men are perceived as threats. Secondly, more Black people live in poverty, a legacy of racism, “increases in the neighborhood percentages of people living in poverty were associated with a 27% higher rate of gun homicides.” Black on Black crime hits young Black men. The SCOTUS decision contributes to both of the above.
Per 100,000, the number of deaths is 23.8 men, 3.8 women.
LikeLike
Listened to this podcast just now, recorded before the ruling: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/23/opinion/sharone-mitchell-jr-and-the-progressive-case-against-gun-permits.html?smid=url-share
I think it provides some interesting perspective on this issue that I would not normally consider.
LikeLike
The transcript is up now, I just read it. Very thought-provoking.
LikeLike
As much as I despise Traitor Trump and would love to volunteer to legally help feed him still alive through a tree shredder, we cannot put all the blame on this malignant narcisistic ass-hat excuse for a human. If Trump went looking for another species to join, even rattle snakes and malarial mosquitoes would vote to turn him down.
Let’s not forget how Mitch McConnel refused to allow the Senate to vote on President Obama’s appointment to the US Supreme court, Chief Judge Merrick Garland, almost a year before the 2016 election. McConnell crowed about pulling that off, and I recently read he continues to brag about it, as he gambled that the next president would be a Republican’s that would appoint a conservative justice.
McConnel’s trickery for Obama’s appointment was that it was too close to the next election and whoever won the presidency in 2016 should decide who the next justice should be.
Almost a year was too close!
Then Rotten Rat McConnell reveled how toxic he was when Ruth Bader Ginsberg died less than two months before the 2020 election and this toxic brew rammed through a 2nd conservative justice while ignoring all the shouts and cries of foul play because less than two months was much closer to a presidential election than 9 months or more.
So, without Black Hearted, Toxic Mitch McConnell, more corrupted than a rotting dead skunk, there would not be an extreme right conservative majority in the US Supreme Court today. Two of those justices should have been appointed by Democrats Obama and Biden.
Traitor Trump is a scheming, lying idiot, too dumb to pull off what Rotten Mitch McConnell did.
I hope whoever reads this doesn’t forget who is really responsible for that extreme right conservatives majority on the US Supreme Court.
LikeLike
McConnell is right up there with Machiavelli, Robespierre, Metternich, Rasputin, Alfred Rosenberg, the Kochs, Murdoch, Wolfowitz– I am sure there are many more our historians can add, this is just what popped into my head…
LikeLike
I guess the majority ignored the meaning of the phrase “well regulated.”
LikeLike
A simple misreading that anyone could have made:
They read “A well regulated militia” as “An UN-regulated militant”
LikeLike
That should be “unrepentant militia”, I think.
LikeLike
unregulated and unrepentant–alas, all too true
LikeLike
I look forward to the arrival of Monty Python’s “crack suicide squad.”
LikeLike
Paul Bonner– yup. The Heller decision echoed Circuit Court decision that the entire clause relating to militias was “prefatory” to the “operating clause,” [an imaginary construct pulled out of their butts] & hence can be ignored. That was a position made up out of whole cloth that is directly counter to the grammar used in 2nd amendment in 1790 & still operative today. “Originalists” ignoring what the ‘originals’ intended.
LikeLike
Once more time, a little bit of history regurgitated …
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/may-24-2022
LikeLike
The coincidental timing of this decision coming at the same time the Senate is considering tepid gun legislation means whatever may come out of Congress is pretty much moot.
Another thing that struck me today is that since we all know the NRA is about making money for its members in any way possible, I’m waiting for the proposal that will allow foreign tourists to get temporary gun permits for their U.S. vacations. Think about it. It makes so much sense. The U.S. is facing a tourism crisis. Now we can advertise to people around the world that they can come to the U.S. to live their Western movie fantasies by actually walking around in public with gun belts and holsters. And loaded guns, no less! The OK Corral historical site could have BYOG nights. I could see it.
I mean, wouldn’t that appeal to an Eastern European who, like many Republicans, think John Wayne movies are accurate history. Wouldn’t the fans of this song think that would be the bomb of a vacation? It’s a logical idea and a great one for many. Get yourself a rented Harley, a rented gun belt, and hit the open road in the West!
LikeLike
Good idea.
States like Wisconsin could advertise “Shoot people to your hearts content with no repercussions — guaranteed!”
Prolly a lot of South American drug kingpins, Russian oligarchs and Afghani war lords would be interested.
LikeLike
I can see one of the ads now: Scarface…It’s Not Just a Movie Anymore, Get Your Tickets to Miami Now and Live You Fantasies!
We monetized students. Why not monetize the violence of which we have so much! Could help address national debt.
LikeLike
How much of a market would there be for White tourists from South Africa?
A minor tutorial about ALEC’s stand your ground defense and the tourists wouldn’t even need to worry about extradition after they returned home. They should be told that their defense’s success is situational based on the skin color of the victim. Maybe, they should be advised not to get their pictures taken wearing white hats and not to be recorded making racial slurs.
LikeLike
Greg, time to start Wildest Part o’ the West Tours!
They’s gold in them thar thrills!
Yeehaw!
LikeLike
Rita Kinney:
I (& very sure) other commenters & readers here take issue w/your inane comments.
Didn’t NYC JUST have a subway shooter?
Weren’t 19 children & 2 adults just gunned down in TX?
I am proud to be an “hysterical commenter’ on this blog.
LikeLike
If Rita is a woman and she’s defending Republicans she’s stupid.
LikeLike
You should change your blogging handle to “retiredandhystericalbutmissthekids”
And I should change mine to SomeDAM Hysterical Poet.
I admit it. I’m hysterical.
LikeLike
There. Changed
LikeLike
OMG, you made me laugh so hard, SDP! In the midst of all this madness, we all need a good laugh. Hysterical!!!
LikeLike
Before the Mass Shooting in Uvalde, Robb Elementary was known for its 1970 Hispanic student walkout. When a popular Hispanic teacher didn’t get his contract renewed at Robb Elementary School in 1970, hundreds of students decided to boycott the school system for weeks in what they called a stand against pervasive discrimination.
Great Story and Video Footage Texas Tribune
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/06/22/uvalde-school-boycott-walkout-shooting-robb-elementary/
LikeLike
Kathy: Thanks again for sharing your depth of knowledge RE: Uvalde.
I have a great amount of respect (& sorrow) for the people in this community.
LikeLike
Once again, as with the January 6th attack on the Capitol and its obeisance to the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, the GOP, at least at organizational level, proves it is the Party of Death, and the Supreme Court (as currently staffed) is its faithful / faith-based “acceptable” legal face.
LikeLike
And, if we listened to the right-wingers (as I did long ago as an ignorant kid), we thought “The Russians are coming.” What’s the reality? The Kavanaughs are coming (and the Thomases, Clarence and Ginni), and the Coney Barretts…
LikeLike
The Justice is Coming
The Justice is coming
But justice is not
His nose he is thumbing
And thumbing a lot!
LikeLike
BTW, Beto O’Rourke will be on Stephen Colbert tonight.
LikeLike
I find this all particularly aggravating because it is exactly the outcome that everyone knew would happen in 2016 when there was an open Supreme Court seat, with the Court divided 4-4 and was poised to move either to the far right, or be a force that might repeal Citizens United and the other rulings damaging to our democracy.
Most times the Supreme Court isn’t really an election issue, but 2016 was unusual because a seat was open! And the remaining 8 justices were divided 4-4. We all had the power to prevent this, and some of us did. Others said it just wasn’t very important. Despite what was right in front of their eyes — a Republican party so willing to reject norms that they refused to even hold hearings on a seat that opened in early February!!!!
If anyone is surprised, they weren’t paying attention. I’m with GregB — this country has accepted the Republican neo-fascist norm-breaking with folks who should know better reinforcing the right wing narrative that what the right wing Republicans are doing is “no different than the Dems”.
And then they have the chutzpah to blame RBG because they say they were fine with the right wing Supreme Court breaking norms as long as it was by a 5-4 majority instead of a 6-3 majority. And we who give these folks legitimacy are part of the probem
LikeLike
Is it fitting that this happened the day before the one month-a-versary (May 24th) of the Uvalde shootings? I was shocked to learn it’s already been a month; given the circumstances, it seems as if it happened yesterday. The situation is so heartbreaking that it continues to remain in the news (good, because this is NOT going to be swept under a rug), especially doggedly by Lawrence O’Donnell, host of MSNBC’s “The Last Word.” ( 9:00 CT, 10 PM ET). Of course, John Oliver/Last Week Tonight addresses School Police on the June 5th Season 9, Episode 13, for nearly the entire show.
If someone has the link, please post it here.
“School Police are not the answer to school shootings. The answer to that is gun control.”–John Oliver
LikeLike
Reminds me of current gun ads that state, “Reclaim your manhood!”
The League of Women Voters of the US has an email out warning about guns being brought to polling places.
Our local online news source (actually, the source is sent throughout the Chicago metropolitan area & all the surrounding suburbs/ ran an ad for 2 election cycles touting their “Election Day Specials,” including all kinds of guns & mentioning that they had huge stocks of ammo.
What message does that send?
(I believe a great readers’ protest resulted, because the ads didn’t run the next election cycle, but Iwill be checking on June & November 2022.)
LikeLike
“To become a card-carrying man, visitors of bushmaster.com will have to prove they’re a man by answering a series of manhood questions. Upon successful completion, they will be issued a temporary Man Card to proudly display to friends and family” — press release from Bushmaster
Reclaim Manhood
Reclaim manhood
Get a gun
Woman fanhood
Not just one
Get a dozen
Hell, get two
Manhood wasn’t
Just to screw
LikeLike
And I actually thought the “reclaim manhood ad” might be just a liberal myth.
Ha!
Lube is stranger than friction.
LikeLike
Number of deaths due to firearms per 100,000 in the U.S., 23.8 men and 3.8 women.
The right wing missed the memo. On the one hand they talk about boys being at risk in society and then SCOTUS makes them more
at risk.
I’d like to see the correlation between deaths by gun and income. I’d speculate that unless you are hunting with Cheney, wealth largely protects men from death by gun.
LikeLike
You mean hunted by Cheney?
LikeLike
These days, SDP, I think the GQP will be hunting FOR Cheney.
LikeLike
“Increases in the neighborhood percentages of people living in poverty were associated with a 27% higher rate of gun homicides.”
LikeLike
“To become a card-carrying man, visitors of bushmaster.com will have to prove they’re a man by answering a series of manhood questions. ”
For example??
“Have you ever shot anyone at a Black Lives Matter protest?”
“Have you ever shot anyone who was jogging while Black?”
LikeLike
“Have you ever thought about shooting your wife?”
LikeLike
Or “Have you ever thought about shooting your mistress?”
LikeLike
“Or your teacher?”
If you answered “yes” to all of these questions, you are a REAL Manly Man and qualify for our drawing for an AR15 with a lifetime supply of armor piercing anmo
LikeLike
Maybe if Dick and Liz went hunting together…
LikeLike
Polling Places or Pulling Places?
Pulling Places
Where you shoot
Skeet and maces
Quite hirsute
LikeLike
Polling Places
Where you scare
Other races
Who are there
LikeLike
SCOTUS once again proves its an arm of the Koch’s ALEC. Increased incarcerations (the U.S. already has the most imprisoned population in the world) and the ALEC laws- three strikes and stand your ground- go hand in hand. SCOTUS creates a situation where the U.S. spends money on prisons instead of on societal advancement programs.
After Roe’s overturn, more people will be in prison for getting or aiding in abortions.
LikeLike
I suspect most of the abortion relate incarcerations will be for people who aided the process, eg, the Uber driver who gave the woman a ride to the back alley where Coat Hangers R US performed the procedure.
LikeLike
“Elections have consequences. The lesser of two evils is always preferable to Pure Evil. A candidate who is good but not perfect is preferable to one who is ignorant and bigoted.”
Incredible that this actually needs to be said.
LikeLike
Mark, I have voted since 1960, when I cast my first vote for JFK. It was a very close election. Many progressives said they would not vote for Kennedy. Arthur Schlesinger Jr wrote a book, “Kennedy or Nixon: Does It Make a Difference?”
I hear the same lament every election from one segment of the Democrats. In 2016, some supporters of Bernie swore they would never vote for HRC evenbb by though Bernie urged them to. They said she was no better than Trump. She won B the popular vote but narrowly lost the electoral vote. If progressives had realized that the choice was between an imperfect but highly intelligent Democrat and an ignorant vainglorious sociopath, she would have won and our country would not be in the mess it’s in today.
Good is better than bad.
The left often manages to shoot itself in the foot, sitting out elections instead of supporting a fellow Democrat whom They can influence. The purity test so beloved on the left elects Republicans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you unequivocally on this, Diane and I appreciate the steadfastness with which you argue this case. I was in Madison, Wisconsin (my hometown, incidentally) in 2000, when so many advanced thinkers on the left voted for Ralph Nader. That his spoiler candidacy…well spoiled the Gore candidacy and brought us George Bush was abundantly clear–which just about every poll indicated was bound to happen. And of course George Bush gave us John Roberts and Samuel Alito–who are voting consistently for these regressive decisions. Yet no one I knew as an acquaintance at the dog park or old friends from high school would accept responsibility for their thrown-away votes. I honestly don’t know how to address this–so I thank your for your clearheaded candor on it. 1960 was your first vote? Alas, it was the year of my birth; 1980 was the first time I voted.
LikeLike
If anyone had a reason to claim he was robbed, it was Al Gore. George Bush’s brother was governor of Florida, where poll workers puzzled over hanging chads. The election was decided by 537 votes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watched that election carefully–I was in the process of deciding whether or not to continue to work on my doctorate (I didn’t), so I had a lot of time on my hands. Several years later, I saw Al Gore speak at Radio City. He opened his talk by characterizing himself as a “recovering politician.” That set his tone–relaxed and jocular–for the evening. I kept wondering (just as I wonder now, as I write this) what this country would look like if the election wasn’t stolen. And Diane? Thanks for all you do.
LikeLike
Diane, Bush won by a vote of 5 to 4.
LikeLike
The Supreme Court is engaged in an all out effort to set back the judicial clock by a half century or more
https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-comment-supreme-court-decision-vega-v-tekoh
Judicial Coup”
The Justice gives one shivers
When Justice is disgrace
Judicial coup delivers
Judicial coup de grace
(And yes, I know it’s pronounced “grahhs”)
LikeLike
It’s called “Hysterical poetic license”
LikeLike
I just received mine yesterday and am eager to use it.
LikeLike
In case anyone is interested, I got my license from a bonafired organization: The American Society of Hysterical and Insane Poets.
The licensure requirements are very strict. You have to demonstrate that you can hit the bullseye of a target at 50 paces, which I easily fulfilled after all those years shooting tin cans and bottles out in the Utah desert.
LikeLike
The lesson: don’t mess with hysterical poets.
LikeLike
Between the loss of Miranda rights and the right to privacy via Roe, I am weeping.
LikeLike
The Miranda rights are not necessarily “lost.”
And many police departments will undoubtedly continue to read them to those who are arrested to nip potential court challenges in the bud.
But the recent ruling makes enforcement of reading Miranda very difficult.
LikeLike
And it’s not the rights (eg, against self incrimination) that are at stake, at any rate, but the reading of those rights.
LikeLike
Well, the Extreme Court just delivered its Dobbs blow.
LikeLike
As bad as it is on its own, Alito’s Dobbs decision is FAR WORSE than it initially appears to be, for it is a template for eliminating a whole body of what are called in the law “unenumerated rights.” The decision from this Extreme Court is revolutionary and was meant to be. It’s the ground-breaking document for a new, fascist version of the United States. I’m not exaggerating. I wish I were. The extreme right-wing has been waiting for this for a long, long tim
LikeLike
LikeLike