The Houston Chronicle reports that the scores of police who responded to the Uvalde massacre did not try to open the doors of the classrooms where the shooter was killing children and teachers until more than an hour had passed. (The story was originally published in the San Antonio Express News.) The story is based on surveillance video.
When you read the story, you will see why Governor Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick are trying to block any public release of official investigations until after the state elections in November. More than 100 “good guys with guns”were unable to stop one bad guy with a gun. The more we learn, the more questions are raised about the training, competence, and courage of those who were supposed to protect the students and teachers.
Surveillance footage shows that police never tried to open a door to two classrooms at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde in the 77 minutes between the time a gunman entered the rooms and massacred 21 people and officers finally breached the door and killed him, according to a law enforcement source close to the investigation.
Investigators believe the 18-year-old gunman who killed 19 children and two teachers at the school on May 24 could not have locked the door to the connected classrooms from the inside, according to the source.
Interactive timeline: Minute-by-minute reconstruction of Uvalde school shooting
All classroom doors at Robb Elementary are designed to lock automatically when they close and can only be locked or unlocked from the outside with a key, the source said. Police might have assumed the door was locked. Yet the surveillance footage suggests gunman Salvador Ramos, 18, was able to open the door to classroom 111 and enter with assault-style rifle — perhaps because the door malfunctioned, the source said.
Another door led to classroom 112.
Ramos entered Robb Elementary at 11:33 a.m. that day through an exterior door that a teacher had pulled shut but that didn’t lock automatically as it was supposed to, indicating another malfunction in door locks at the school.
Police finally breached the door to classroom 111 and killed Ramos at 12:50 p.m. Whether the door was unlocked the entire time remains under investigation.
Regardless, officers had access the entire time to a “halligan” — a crowbar-like tool that could have opened the door to the classrooms even if it was locked, the source said.
Two minutes after Ramos entered the building, three Uvalde police officers chased him inside. Footage shows that Ramos fired rounds inside classrooms 111 and 112, briefly exited into the hallway and then re-entered through the door, the source said.
Ramos then shot at the officers through the closed door, grazing two of them with shrapnel. The officers retreated to wait for backup and heavy tactical equipment rather than force their way into the classrooms.
Pedro “Pete” Arredondo, the Uvalde school district police chief and the on-scene incident commander, has said he spent more than an hour in the hallway of the school. He told the Texas Tribune that he called for tactical gear, a sniper and keys to get inside. He said he held officers back from the door to the classrooms for 40 minutes to avoid gunfire.
When a custodian brought a large key ring, Arredondo said he tried dozens of the keys but none worked.
But Arredondo was not trying those keys in the door to classrooms 111 and 112, where Ramos was holed up, according to the law enforcement source. Rather, he was trying to locate a master key by using the various keys on doors to other classrooms nearby, the source said.
While Arredondo waited for a tactical team to arrive, children and teachers inside the classrooms called 911 at least seven times with desperate pleas for help. One of the two teachers who died, Eva Mireles, called her husband by cellphone after she was wounded and lay dying.

“He said he held officers back from the door to the classrooms for 40 minutes to avoid gunfire.”
Understandable. Just like firefighters hold back to avoid fire when people are trapped in a burning building.
Oh, wait….
LikeLike
BTW, in case anyone thinks that police are required to protect citizens check out Supreme Court case Castle Rock vs. Gonzalez (2005). Police have no duty to protect. But yet defunding them is a bad idea….
LikeLike
Defunding the police is not only a bad idea, it’s a stupid idea.
LikeLike
Too bad they didn’t have a No-Knock Warrant …
LikeLike
“More than 100 “good guys with guns”were unable to stop one bad guy with a gun.”
Not to be too picky, but you kind of buried the lede a little bit.
LikeLike
And, what a great lede it was. I probably quoted it inaccurately in my post below, but the idea is seared into my brain.
LikeLike
Doesn’t matter how many good guys with guns there are if none of them has a brain.
LikeLike
But seriously, this is another example of the general low quality of law enforcement across the board in the U.S., from local police forces to TSA to state troopers. I am always amazed by the lack of physical fitness, general engagement with the public, and pettiness of what I have experienced in my life as compared to my experiences with police–which have virtually always been positive and helpful–in western and Eastern Europe. As we saw in Uvalde, fragmented local policing can create pork-barrel positions where providing a paycheck for relatively little work becomes more important than mission. I’m not saying all law enforcement is bad, but I have yet to see the local head of any Fraternal Order of Police chapter who gives me any hope that police are there to serve citizens, not the other way around.
LikeLike
Yep,
LikeLike
….or courage.
LikeLike
Or a heart. Wait, that’s something else I’m thinking of.
LikeLike
Which was missing? Brains or courage?
LikeLike
Courage requires a brain.
Otherwise it us just stupidity.
LikeLike
I’ll remember that statement (Brilliant!) ” 100 ‘good guys with guns’ coundn’t stop 1 ‘bad guy with a gun'”.
If the guns are out there, the ‘bad guy’ will get one (think Rittenhouse). The answer to mass shootings is to ban the weapons most likely to cause them. That would be guns with large magazines (certainly ones that hold more than five or six rounds, BB guns excluded). And, this includes similarly disarming the police.
‘Background checks’ and ‘Red Flag Laws’ are window dressing.
LikeLike
But I thought the police chief said he tried lots of keys and none of them fit.
Maybe he was trying to open a door to the wrong classroom?
Or maybe he was trying to open the right door but in a parallel universe?
All sorts of possibilities here.
LikeLike
A report I saw said they were trying keys on a completely different classroom door. Not sure why…
LikeLike
Apparently the chief of police was looking for a master key that would open all doors. He didn’t realize that the doors to the classroom where the killings were happening were unlocked. They could not be locked from the inside, only the outside.
LikeLike
This reply is probably more fitting for the next post, which asks if we will ever get to the bottom of this. The answer is simply no. No one involved in this horrendous affair will remember anything correctly. Those directly involved are racked with guilt, a human emotion that complicates every truth. Those in the bureaucratic chain of response are either cynically guarding their political future, or genuine in their misunderstanding of facts that create guilt in their memories. Even farther up the chain, politicians who might easily have to accept blame for policy decisions will be covering that portion of their anatomy which is often mentioned at times like these.
So we will never have a distinct truth here, a tragedy for the families involved, for truth is a powerful thing when it comes to healing. Some years ago, a friend lost her daughter to a pistol shot from a teenager. He was trying, as I was told, to prove his disregard for human life. I think he confessed all this. Owing to the known truth of the matter as it was stated i court, and owing to the genuine nature of my friend, she was able to deliver an emotional hug to the mother of the boy upon the verdict. She was able to redeem the situation as far as she was able. I believe that she was able to conclude this because the truth was spoken in a place in our society where truth is sacrosanct.
We will not get a hint of truth in this matter until we are in court, where we as Americans have made a covenant with our government to speak the truth or face sanctions. Then and then only will truth, such as it is, emerge, and redemption begin.
LikeLike
We might never know what did happen, but we are finding out what didn’t happen (albeit slowly).
And on the po!ice side, a lot more didn’t happen than did.
LikeLike
Come on, this is Texas ruled by a fascist, lying, rabble rousing, corrupt Republican governor. Texas is known as a red state. Red states support letting mothers die if she carries a fetus to term and there is a high risk she will die delivering the child. In some Red states if a pregnant women decides to have an abortions’ instead of risk dying, she may end up in prison for murder. In one red state, I read about a pregnant women that ended up in prison for taking pain meds prescribed by her doctor for her migraine headaches.
Red states support the right to sell weapons to anyone, even children in some cases.
It’s apparent to me that Texas like most if not all of the other RED states controlled by the Fascist Repulibican Party values and worships painful death more than life. They also worship profits first. If people die so weapons manufacturers can incase profits, those people are just colleterial damage.
That’s why the economic capitalist system in the US is called Cutthroat Capitalism.
If anyone that lives in a red state doesn’t like that fact, they should move to a blue state that values life over death.
LikeLike
Careful, Lloyd…
I’ve seen plenty of racism, fascism, lying and so on in ‘Blue States’. You are promoting regional division by attacking ‘the other’. That doesn’t solve the problem, it only helps one deflect responsibility.
You are advocating a breakup of the ‘United States’. Why did we fight a very costly Civil War? Should we become ethnic enclaves, or tribal entities?
LikeLike