Peter Wehner, once a loyal and very conservative Republican, now excoriates the moral collapse of the GOP.
The sheer scale of Donald Trump’s depravity is unmatched in the history of the American presidency, and the Republican Party—the self-described party of law and order and “constitutional conservatives,” of morality and traditional values, of patriotism and Lee Greenwood songs—made it possible. It gave Trump cover when he needed it. It attacked his critics when he demanded it. It embraced his nihilistic ethic. It amplified his lies. When House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy—a man who for a few fleeting hours after the January 6 insurrection dared to speak critically of Donald Trump—traveled to Mar-a-Lago a few days later to kiss his ring, it was an act of self-abasement that was representative of his party, his morally desolate party.
Diane Ravitch's blog 
Morality has been on the brink for some time already – regardless of party.
LikeLike
Peskyvera, you are fast to criticize bad behavior in the U.S. When will you criticize Putin for the carnage and massacres he has inflicted on the people of Ukraine?
LikeLike
This not about Dumpty-Rumpty, Depravity, Moral Collapse or Party Self-Abasement.
Let us not publish a story that continues to cover-up the truth.
It is about money. Citizens United. Putin Payola. Oligarch cold cash flowing in from everywhere.
Cheap-o human beings bought, paid for and recruited to the GOPee.
Pathologicals who will do anything, say anything and follow anyone giving them access to power. Why was the GOPee the party of choice for this calculated/orchestrated infection?
Why was it so easy and so total?
LikeLike
You are right.
It’s all about money.
Besides morality can be whatever people want it to be .
LikeLike
Donald Trump is so corrupt that people have stopped talking about the moral failings of “Tricky Dick.” After all the meticulous investigations, if the Jan 6th committee cannot find something actionable in the gory details, we may have to have another discussion about moral failings.
LikeLike
Compared to Trump, Nixon was a statesman. He had the decency to resign rather than face the shame of impeachment. Trump has no shame. No principles. Unlike Nixon, who had some understanding of international issues, Trump is a dunce.
Woodward and Bernstein wrote after the Jan 6 hearings that both Nixon and Trump are/were criminals, but Nixon never attempted to overthrow the government. The irony of Watergate is that it was completely unnecessary. Nixon would have been re-elected without staging a petty theft (in fact, he was re-elected in 1972). He was driven out of office in 1974 when the facts about Watergate were revealed. Republicans were appalled, as were Democrats that the president would stoop so low. Today, how many Republicans are appalled that Trump attempted a coup? How many Republican Senators and members of the House stood against Trump’s offenses to the Constitution? Why is this unindicted conspirator still the leader of his party?
LikeLike
In many ways, the resignation of Nixon brought Trump to power. No I am not crazy.
I grew up in an extremely conservative area. Not surprisingly, it is now home not just to home grown Trumpists, but to migrating conservatives from all over the country. The experience I had being a person who opposed Nixon is instructive. I recall more than one conversation with a Nixon supporter who voiced the wish that he had stayed and fought the charges. After all, went the rationale, he was no worse than the democrats. When they got trump, they got a fighter for them (or so they thought), not someone weak like Nixon.
LikeLike
I think part of that difference is that impeachment is viewed differently today than in Nixon’s day. Back then, only one president had been impeached, over a hundred yrs earlier. Its seriousness was diminished by the impeachment of Clinton, which many saw as a calculated partisan move to bring down a president based on a ‘sex scandal’ more appropriately handled by censure. Clinton’s reputation is only slightly marred; it’s seen as a footnote to his legacy. Trump used that cynically [as he uses anything that might work] to his advantage, depicting those who would impeach him for serious political breaches as simply partisan attempts to smear him.
LikeLike
Today’s?
LikeLike
Hate to break it to you. It began in the 50s, made a splash in 1964, came to power in 1980, destroyed the federal legislative process in 1995, made it officially fascist in 2016, paralyzed governance in 2021, and will likely end constitutional governance in 2025. The Idiot is the magnifying glass killing the ants. The light has always been there, but it was dim for most of our history.
LikeLike
As usual you saved me a lot of typing.
LikeLike
Anytime.
LikeLike
Well said. Trump needs to pay for any illegal behavior, or we are only watching political theater.
LikeLike
Liz Cheney: “Tonight, I say this to my Republican colleagues, you are defending the indefensible, there will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain,”
There it is!
Put it on bumper stickers and billboards, full page ads in small town papers, Union Newsletters
Go to your local school board meeting and city council meeting and say it – relevant to the agenda or not – BECUAUSE IT’S LOCAL and IT WILL GET COVERED LOCALLY!
LikeLike
yes!
LikeLike
The irony about Liz Cheney’s closing line, her comment to other Republicans that one day Trump will be gone, “but your dishonor will remain” was spoken by Laura Ingraham on FOX to show how vapid and boring Cheney was. In fact, Cheney was eloquent. Ingraham demonstrated how clueless she is.
LikeLike
Trump is a disgrace and there is no justifiable defense for what he did on Jan. 6 and afterward; he will never admit to his moral failures. Al Sharpton is a disgrace and there is no justifiable defense for what he did in the Tawana Brawley case and the many other times he incited racial violence; he will never admit to his moral failures.
Republican politicians kiss up to Trump and Democratic politicians kiss up to Sharpton for the same reason: a large faction in their respective parties will tolerate no criticism of their heroes, and few politicians will sacrifice their political careers by doing the right thing. It has ever been so.
LikeLike
Al Sharpton was never president of the USA, he has never held any political office. Why are you drawing some kind of equivalence between Trump and Sharpton? Totally inane and it gives cover to Trump who still contends he won the election. When did Al Sharpton try to overturn the results of an election and Sharpton has no where near the power of a president or ex-president. What a silly comparison.
LikeLike
I agree that because of his official position Trump’s misconduct is far more serious and dangerous than was Sharpton’s. The point I’m making is that few politicians from any party will have the courage to stand up to someone in their party who is popular with the party base. If a Democratic Trump-like figure were on the political scene, few if any elected Democrats would call him out. The top priorities – by far – for almost all politicians are self-preservation and career advancement. I’m not being cynical – just realistic based on extensive reading in history and long observation of politicians during my lifetime.
LikeLike
Sharpton’s criminal acts are also very small-time by comparison.
LikeLike
Jackie,
I remember the Tawana Brawley case well. I can never respect Sharpton for his actions in accusing innocent people of crimes they did not commit.
But as others have observed, this is not in the same league as a President trying to stage a coup to remain in power.
LikeLike
I remember the Tawana Brawley as it unfolded. A 15 year old girl was found with racial slurs written on her, dog feces smeared on her, and when brought to the hospital couldn’t speak. The idea that she was an amazing teen actress who would do that to herself to escape some parental punishment seemed fairly unlikely. Some unethical lawyers and Sharpton tried to get some political mileage out of it, but I also don’t entirely believe the story that she just did it to herself and knew how to act traumatized to the first responders and hospital staff who saw her first.
I have also noticed that people like Jackie Kinner are quite dishonest in how they invoke Tawana Brawley. Jackie Kinner is the one who has politicized this. In fact, DEMOCRAT politicians like Mario Cuomo and Robert Abrams were attacked by Sharpton and Tawana’s lawyers, so I have no idea what she is talking about when she makes the false equivalencies with how the Republicans are lying about Democrats. Sharpton also lied about Democrats.
People forget exactly what happened and blame Sharpton for a cop who committed suicide a few days after Tawana was found. That person was never once mentioned as being connected to Tawana until AFTER he committed suicide! And he was only connected because law enforcement had decided to record Tawana Brawley’s phone calls and she alluded to his involvement AFTER he was already dead.
I would say that the Grand Jury report was looking to exonerate the accused, not to find out what really happened. There were no charges brought. One prosecutor won a defamation suit, although the attacks on him don’t seem any more vile than the accusations that Republicans regularly make against Democrats (hello pedophile pizza ring!). Trump and his right wing cronies regularly defamed Democrats like Elijah Cummings and many others.
In short, Jackie Kinner should apologize for trying to say that the Tawana Brawley incident where DEMOCRAT politicians like Mario Cuomo was attacked has any equivalency to the depravity of today’s Republican party. That is a blatant lie.
LikeLike
Jackie Kinner
Tawana Brawley was 1987 Sharpton was nearly killed leading an anti racism march in 92.
If DJT had cleaned up his act as well as Sharpton, I would vote for him(not quite).
But it goes a bit further since joining MSNBC he fits right in with Joe Scarborough . Sharpton certainly leaning right of center in the Party.
LikeLike
Jackie– You are casting about trying to find a prominent public figure whom Democrats refuse to publicly condemn even when caught in scurrilous behavior, in order to make a parallel to the countless Republicans who defend or remain silent before Trump’s scandalous, corrupt, and treasonous actions. Sharpton isn’t remotely in that league, nor is his defense of someone who turned out to be a liar. There is no “Democratic Trump-like figure” in real life, nor can I imagine one. The phenomenon of virtually an entire party’s leadership kowtowing to a wannabe-autocrat because of his cult-like hold on a chunk of their base– this is unique, and it’s uniquely Republican.
LikeLike
Bethree, 100% agree. The GOP is—with remarkably few exceptions—the party of Trump, defending a traitor.
LikeLike
Merrick Garland recently told an interviewer that the office of Legal Counsel memo preventing the DOJ from bring charges against a sitting president is “limited to acts while the person was in office.” This is profoundly disturbing.
Garland is clearly suggesting that a President can only be prosecuted by the DOJ for acts he committed while NOT in office. That’s horrifying.
Can a FORMER President be charged by the DOJ for illegal acts committed while he was in office? According to this statement from A.G. Garland, no.
A lot of conservatives these days, who are all in for fascist stongman rule, are with Richard Nixon on this: “If the president does it, it’s not illegal.” Or with the Man with No Plan and the Tan in the Can, the Idiot: “Then I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as president.”
That’s, ofc, appalling. Utterly undemocratic. It gives to the president the powers of an absolute monarch. This is the same position taken by the Monarchists against whom we fought a Revolutionary War. Surely, in Hobbes’s words, we all need to live under “a common power to keep [us] all in awe,” or as Queen Elizabeth I wrote in 1601, “The Royal Prerogative [is] not to be canvassed, nor disputed, nor examined, and [does] not even admit of any limitation.”That’s, ofc, appalling. Utterly undemocratic. It gives to the president the powers of an absolute monarch. This is the same position taken by the Monarchists against whom we fought a Revolutionary War. Surely, in Hobbes’s words, we all need to live under “a common power to keep [us] all in awe,” or as Queen Elizabeth I wrote in 1601, “The Royal Prerogative [is] not to be canvassed, nor disputed, nor examined, and [does] not even admit of any limitation.”
Garland is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. But he seems to think that the notion that we have Equal Justice Under Law in this country is just, I don’t know, a marketing slogan, rather than being fundamental to our existence as a nation.
LikeLike
Look, A.G. Garland. Everybody knows. Everybody. Trump and his Clown Car Possse are guilty of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and seditious conspiracy. You have charged 800 Dumbo Rambos who heeded Trump’s call. But Trump gets a pass?
If he does, then forget it. This is clearly no longer anything approaching a democratic state under the rule of law.
LikeLike
I would like to think that this comment by A.G. Garland was simply a misstatement. We all make them. But the American people deserve some clarity on this. Do you think, Mr. Garland, that a president can be charged by the DOJ for crimes committed while he or she was in office?
LikeLike
Yikes. An important correction: Do you think, Mr. Garland, that a FORMER president can be charged by the DOJ for crimes committed while he or she was in office?
LikeLike
Yikes. I failed to edit, again, before hitting the Reply button. Mea culpa.
LikeLike
As I’d commented on an earlier thread,
Garland is yet another major (dis)appointment by Obama, Arne Duncan, of course, being the other.
What horrendous, irrevocable damage these appointments have done/are doing.
LikeLike
Arne Duncan is a disappointment to his mother, who was hoping for a human child.
LikeLike
Prosecuting Trump for a crime would be unwise at this time. It would be the right thing to do, but it would backfire and wind up being an injustice. First, it would give Trump encouragement to run in 2024 and hand him some juicy conspiracy theory meat to throw to his supporters to feed his campaign. It would also take years, eventually becoming a threat to democracy, prosecuting a presidential candidate. And which Trump selected court would preside? Hint: One of the justices is known for crying and really likes beer a lot.
No, the true purpose of these hearings is to persuade Congress to enact legislation protecting our election process. The certification of votes must be changed. The Electoral College must be improved. The protection of voting and ballot counting is imperative. The January 6 hearings are not about prosecuting a Republican president or the Republican Party; they are about prosecuting the system that enabled that Republican president and the party he consumed to do what they did. It must never happen again.
LikeLike
If Teflon Trump gets away with this, then anything goes. It’s vindication for his modus operandi going forward. The message to the bizarre new version of the Republican Party is you can do this and it will result in nothing but a lot of hot air. The Republican Senate, and after November’s election, perhaps a Republican House and Senate, isn’t going to pass election reform.
LikeLike
That’s why the hearings are so powerfully put together. They are, so far, very carefully choreographed, with short videos and sound bytes to capture the short-spanned attention of a Twitter-loving audience. They are trying to convince a Republican audience to fear the inciting of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to violence. Legislation is the goal.
You’re probably right, it will fail. But then, so would a criminal prosecution. Merrick Garland would be a Supreme Court justice if it weren’t for the shenanigans of the Republican Party. I doubt he is trying to help them by sidestepping prosecuting. I think he’s being careful not to walk into a trap.
LikeLike
The protection of voting and ballot counting is imperative.
YES!
LikeLike
I’m with Bob .
LikeLike
So, LeftCoast, I very respectfully disagree on this. Trump must be prosecuted.
LikeLike
Well, I can’t believe I’m about to evoke the words of Ivanka Trump, as my own but I respect Attorney General Garland. So, I accepted what he was saying.
LikeLike
The Republicans are beholden to Trump for one simple reason: they cannot win elections without the Trumpers.
They are the minority party. The people who love Trump are blue collar workers who either did not vote often before 2016 or were labor Democrats years ago.
That 15% of new voters makes the Republicans more likely to win. Additionally, traditional conservatives will vote for anybody that has an (R) next to the name.
The Republicans don’t have to cater to their traditional base. As long as rank and file Republicans stick with the party of Trump, the Republicans can just disregard them.
So the party drifts more rightward.
It’s sad but that’s the calculation.
LikeLike
Nailed it. There was one other important part of this: Because Trump is so profoundly stupid and ignorant, people like McConnell could waive anything their fat cat donors wanted to have signed under the big boss man’s orange nose, and he would scrawl his ridiculous cat scratch under it. A useful idiot.
LikeLike
McConnell=backfeifengesicht.
(Another one, like it cruz.)
For those who’s not read my writing this word before, backfeifengesicht is German & literally translates into “a face in need of punching.”
After John Bohner’s Cruz comments back in the day, this word came up.
There’s even a cruz meme.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol
LikeLike
What a great word!
LikeLike
I was fascinated by the hearings of the Jan 6 committee. The only assertion that I found hard to believe was that Trump planned a grand conspiracy. He is so stupid that I can’t believe he planned anything. I believe he was surrounded by plotters like Guiliani and Flynn and the strange Powell. Any of them could have planned a conspiracy. But Trump?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly. And that’s part of the reason why he has maintained plausible deniability. The Don just hints at what he wants, and the capos carry it out. But if they don’t, if they don’t do the job, then they get wacked. This is how every mobster works, and Trump is a mobster. The Don, Cheeto “Little Fingers” Trumpbalone.
LikeLike
I am completely serious about this. That is Trump’s MO. He’s a mobster.
LikeLike
He has certainly used the lingo of mobsters.
LikeLike
I would call money laundering for Russian mobsters a mob activity.
LikeLike
In an interesting parallel story in my novel, the Tsar of Borisland sends agents to infiltrate the National Association for the Promotion of School Shootings, which then makes a 30-million-dollar our guy’s election campaign!
LikeLike
One doesn’t have to be smart to play that game. I remember how, before Gotti was arrested, the press built a whole mystique around the Dapper Don. Oh, so subtle, so crafty! But then came his final trial, and the FBI leaked the transcripts of telephone conversations Gotti had. They revealed a nearly totally illiterate person, crude, stupid, blundering, blustering, incapable of putting together coherent statements. But he had a lot of paid fixers and goons. That’s how it works.
LikeLike
And that was the reality of The Dapper Don. He was just another ignorant street thug who happened to have money, power, no moral compass whatsoever, and unscrupulous people to arrange things for him for pay.
LikeLike
That’s how it has usually worked. There have been exceptions. Meyer Lansky was no dummy.
LikeLike
Reporters surround LAWYER coming down courthouse steps.
REPORTER 1: So, is it true that your client is head of the Bombambino Crime Family?
LAWYER: My client is an honest businessman. This is simply harassment, and the D.A. knows it. Don’t believe everything you read in the papers. Fake news.
Reporter 2: The Bombambino Family, the Mafia?
LAWYER: What Mafia? There is no Mafia.
LikeLike
Every big city prosecutor knows this shtick. Rule 1: Shield the Boss. The boss’s hands stay clean.
LikeLike
So, I’ve been thinking of writing a novel. Entirely fictional, of course. It’s about how a ne’er-do-well playboy inherits half a billion dollars from Daddy and blows it all on overbuilding casinos because he’s a terrible businessperson and is about to go bankrupt, and no one will lend to him to cover his upcoming payments, but then he takes a trip to a Kleptocratic country called Borisland, and suddenly a German Bank called Wienerschnitzel A.G. is lending him a billion dollars and all these operatives start showing up from Borisland to buy properties with millions in cash, and next thing you know, the guy is running for president, and all these Senators who were screaming that the guy is a crook and a fraud are compromised by Borisland agents who really have the goods on them, and they suddenly become his biggest supporters. I know, crazy, huh? Quite an imagination, though, huh?
LikeLike
Apples to Oranges. What Sharpton did was indeed reprehensible. But he wasn’t attempting to overthrow the Govt. and destroy democracy as was (are) Trump and his minions.
LikeLike
One of our longtime retired GOP Congressman, John Porter, just passed away, & much mention was made as to how well he worked across the aisle, particularly with his next district over Democrat counterpart, Sidney Yates (o.b.m.), so much so that when there was a redistricting, rather than run against his friend, Porter moved over to the next district to run there.
Rest in peace, Congressman Porter.
And, to you in the GOP today, WORK in peace…& for the good of your constituents.
(Of course, doubt that any Republican s in office/running for office read this blog!)
LikeLike
That party, those people, are gone. I lived in Massachusetts when Mitt Romney was governor. He was like that. Worked across the aisle. Created for the state what later became Obamacare.
LikeLike
Agree, Bob, & sadly so. As I’ve called them, GOP= Groveling Old Penumbras.
& the younger ones are just
Odious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well said, Retired!
LikeLike
Romney is still around but has never been who he pretends to be.
LikeLike
He’s like former Senator Jeff “Fake” , who criticized Trump but supported the vast majority of his policies.
LikeLike
The mere fact that these folks have not left the Republican party tells you all you need to know.
LikeLike
Thanks for that info. John Porter was one of the last decent Republicans. His support for increased NIH funding has translated into realistic hope for patients with many diseases and disabilities. He would have no home in the Republican Party today.
LikeLike
You’re welcome, Greg. It’s always a pleasure to remember legislators who truly served the people &, most of all, were human beings.
A commenter (I think on the next post) referred to “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” one of my favorite–if not favorite–films. Jimmy Stewart just made me cry my eyes out & then, the response from the evil doing legislator openly admitting his bad–in what world would that happen today? ( & as I type this, there’s a commercial for this right-wing GOP gubernatorial candidate who spouts venom toward the public schools–“where teacher teach sex education in Grades K-3…where children aren’t allowed to pray…” &, then, all his pro-life claptrap: he & his wife have kids, but are foster parents, too! One of our Chicago papers described his family as presenting “straight from central casting.” In a crowded Republican Primary, this guy comes in w/13%: whew!)
LikeLike
Reblogged this on What's Gneiss for Education.
LikeLike
MR. PHEWTUS
.
.
̲T̲r̲u̲m̲p̲i̲a̲n̲ ̲P̲e̲d̲o̲p̲h̲i̲l̲i̲a̲:̲ ̲O̲r̲ ̲H̲i̲d̲d̲e̲n̲ ̲K̲e̲r̲d̲o̲t̲e̲l̲e̲p̲a̲e̲d̲o̲l̲a̲g̲n̲o̲p̲h̲o̲n̲e̲u̲o̲p̲h̲i̲l̲i̲a̲ ̲A̲p̲o̲c̲a̲l̲p̲s̲e̲
.
.
Now that the problem of Hillary Clinton’s emails would appear to have been resolved (and– so said!– the “sexual habits” of Bill Clinton!), what we are now left with is a collection of Net Media Reports which reveal amassed court evidence concerning the complicit involvement of Donald J. Trump in C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲!… and as indicated in the ensuing URLs (ILLEGAL, TORTIOUS OR SERENDIPITOUS!) at,…
.
https://bit.ly/2qFwqHx… and… https://bit.ly/3381gpu… and… https://bit.ly/2OEuxCM… and… https://bit.ly/2s1bScG… and… etc.!…
.
Question: was Andrew’s “out-of-court” a “Seal” on Gates’ and PHEWTUS’ “haircombing involvement (the which, Gates and PHEWTUS would gladly fund to keep ‘Sealed’!)”?… and, will “Max” live to expound her, “yet to be revealed– and hoped for– would-be DYSsalacious testimony/ testimonial (and life-threatening, as a ‘COUNTER DESEALING fund offer’ and an ‘OFFICIALLY PENNED early release offer’ by a number of ‘ANTI-GROOMING INTERESTS’ may pose a substantial threat to Billy and PHEWTUS [or to PHEWTUS’ ‘WHITE House Fixers’, who want ‘their boy’ back on his ‘high horse {at least, somewhere near the rump!}’!]– and, ‘PURE’!)”?
.
Simply put, the abovednoted URLs should compel an IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION by the FBI into these C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ allegations (and, regardless of the withdrawal of the allegation of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ by the alleged victim (Ms Jane Doe) on November 4, 2016… due to expressed fears for her life– stated her counsel!)!… and let alone, an FBI investigation into the hacking of the DNC by Russians (and, so said, by “Conservative interests”!)! And which should compel– as well… and, if legally necessary!… T̲H̲E̲ ̲A̲R̲R̲E̲S̲T̲ ̲O̲F̲ ̲D̲O̲N̲A̲L̲D̲ ̲J̲. T̲R̲U̲M̲P̲!
.
Either this “alleged” victim is held to account for pushing “FAUX NEWS (Y̲E̲A̲, ̲C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ ̲M̲I̲S̲C̲H̲I̲E̲F̲!… A̲T̲ ̲L̲E̲A̲S̲T̲!)” by way of her testimony (and a testimony, incidentally, attested to by other alleged witnesses!), O̲R̲ ̲T̲R̲U̲M̲P̲ ̲S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲B̲E̲ ̲H̲E̲L̲D̲ ̲T̲O̲ ̲A̲C̲C̲O̲U̲N̲T̲ ̲B̲E̲F̲O̲R̲E̲ ̲A̲ ̲C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ ̲C̲O̲U̲R̲T̲! There can be N̲O̲ ̲M̲O̲R̲A̲T̲O̲R̲I̲U̲M̲ re an allegation of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲!… and which has been made manifest re other C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ allegations! And, if an American State would contend that there is such a MORATORIUM, then there’s a clear case for a Constitutional Challenge re DUE PROCESS under the 5th Amendment, and a case of/ for a denial of EQUAL PROTECTION under the 14th Amendmentᵃ, regarding States that/ which do not have such a MORATORIUM! In other words, Trump can’t hide behind a State’s claim that a State-legislated MORATORIUM holds sway over DUE PROCESS and EQUAL PROTECTION! But also!… no one making such a claim (and, given the significance of same!) should be held blameless if such a claim is PROVEN to be false!… and so, N̲E̲C̲E̲S̲S̲I̲T̲A̲T̲I̲N̲G̲ ̲I̲M̲M̲E̲D̲I̲A̲T̲E̲ ̲F̲B̲I̲ ̲I̲N̲V̲O̲L̲V̲E̲M̲E̲N̲T̲ (A̲T̲ ̲L̲E̲A̲S̲T̲!), and a court’s determination of the “F̲A̲C̲T̲S̲”– of guilt, or of innocence! AND DITTO, REGARDING ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE ELSEWHERE PERTAINING TO ANY OTHER NOTABLE POLITICAL FIGURE!
.
Further, we may very well learn– i.e., given the PROVEN VERACITY of the allegations of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲!– that the ACTUAL REASON that this “character” became involved in the 2016 U.S. Federal Elections races, was to H̲I̲D̲E̲ from these allegations within the SMOKE SCREEN of a Federal Presidential Election campaign (AND THROUGH THE ASSISTANCE OF– HOW SHALL I PHRASE IT?– “LIKE-MINDED” “OFF-SHORE INTERESTS”!… AND– QUITE CONCEIVABLY!– “LIKE-MINDED” “ELECTORAL COLLEGE MEMBER INTERESTS”!… SEE, PROVERBS 28:1!)!… A̲N̲D̲ I̲N̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲G̲U̲I̲S̲E̲ ̲O̲F̲ ̲S̲E̲R̲V̲I̲N̲G̲ ̲H̲I̲S̲ ̲C̲O̲U̲N̲T̲R̲Y̲! And, is it beyond our imagining that “certain interests” which deal in GLOBAL CHILD SEX TRAFFICKINGᵇ (and, even if only for perverse “personal pleasures”!… for a price!), would want to continue with such “dealings” U̲N̲E̲N̲C̲U̲M̲B̲E̲R̲E̲D̲? And, to be honest!… I wouldn’t put it past this “POTUS HUCKSTER” and “HUSTLER” to have “played” the RNC, his “alleged” R̲A̲P̲E̲ ̲V̲I̲C̲T̲I̲M̲, her family and America, in order to escape the “cuffs of justice”!… i.e., in the light of what we’ve come to learn about his PROVEN “MISOGYNIST HUBRIS (to put it mildly!)”! In other words, such DYSIC BEHAVIOUR by Trump, I̲S̲ ̲N̲O̲T̲ ̲”O̲U̲T̲ ̲O̲F̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲B̲L̲U̲E̲”!
.
Simply said, if what is alleged of Donald Trump is TRUE, then this “Potus Reject” S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲N̲E̲V̲E̲R̲ ̲H̲A̲V̲E̲ ̲H̲E̲L̲D̲ ̲O̲F̲F̲I̲C̲E̲!… A̲N̲D̲ ̲S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲N̲O̲T̲ ̲H̲O̲L̲D̲ ̲O̲F̲F̲I̲C̲E̲ ̲I̲N̲ ̲2̲0̲2̲4̲!… A̲N̲D̲, ̲A̲T̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲V̲E̲R̲Y̲ ̲L̲E̲A̲S̲T̲, S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲H̲A̲V̲E̲ ̲B̲E̲E̲N̲ ̲C̲O̲M̲P̲E̲L̲L̲E̲D̲ T̲O̲ ̲S̲T̲E̲P̲ ̲D̲O̲W̲N̲ ̲U̲N̲T̲I̲L̲ A̲L̲L̲ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ A̲L̲L̲E̲G̲A̲T̲I̲O̲N̲S̲ ̲W̲E̲R̲E̲ ̲Q̲U̲A̲S̲H̲E̲D̲! A̲N̲D̲ ̲N̲O̲ ̲P̲R̲E̲S̲I̲D̲E̲N̲T̲I̲A̲L̲ ̲W̲A̲N̲N̲A̲-̲B̲E̲ U̲N̲D̲E̲R̲ ̲S̲U̲C̲H̲ ̲A̲ N̲A̲S̲T̲Y̲ ̲C̲L̲O̲U̲D̲, S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲B̲E̲ ̲E̲N̲T̲I̲T̲L̲E̲D̲ ̲T̲O̲ ̲B̲E̲ ̲I̲N̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲W̲H̲I̲T̲E̲ ̲H̲O̲U̲S̲E̲! Unless, and of course, the Reports that the Huffington Post (and others) have publicized were all but “FAKE NEWS”!… the fabrication of the “Liberal Left”, and but further samples of “Trump bashing”! The which, in that event, should have been– and should be today!– held L̲I̲B̲E̲L̲O̲U̲S̲ (and, regardless of any initiative on Donald Trump’s part!… and, regardless of whomever pushed such “FAKE NEWS”!)! O̲R̲ ̲S̲U̲C̲H̲ ̲S̲H̲O̲U̲L̲D̲ ̲B̲E̲ ̲A̲C̲T̲E̲D̲ ̲U̲P̲O̲N̲! In other words, the FBI– at least!– should be proactively addressing such “FAKE NEWS”!… OR, ACTING UPON LEGIT NEWS ACCOUNTS THAT/ WHICH HAVE REPORTED ACCURATE CLAIMS INVOLVING DONALD TRUMP IN ACTS OF C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲! AND, DITTO… AND ONCE AGAIN!… RE ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE ELSEWHERE PERTAINING TO ANY OTHER NOTABLE POLIT(IC) FIGURE!… BUT, ETC.!
.
NOTE: IN A FAILURE BY THE FBI TO HOLD DONALD J. TRUMP TO ACCOUNT, ONE MUST BE H̲I̲G̲H̲L̲Y̲ ̲S̲U̲S̲P̲I̲C̲I̲O̲U̲S̲– Y̲E̲A̲, ̲D̲I̲S̲T̲R̲U̲S̲T̲F̲U̲L̲!– OF A̲N̲Y̲ “INTELLIGENCE AGENCY” THAT WOULD DIRECTLY AND/ OR INDIRECTLY UNDERESTIMATE THE S̲E̲R̲I̲O̲U̲S̲ ̲T̲H̲R̲E̲A̲T̲ THAT SUCH BEHAVIOUR POSES TO AMERICA’S CHILDREN, AND TO AMERICA’S FAMILIES!… LET ALONE, TO THE “ALLEGED” VICTIM! AND!… A̲N̲Y̲ SUCH FAILURE ON THE PART OF THE FBI TO GO AFTER DONALD J. TRUMP, SHOULD COMPEL THE QUESTIONS: A) IS THE FBI OF ANY FURTHER VALUE TO AMERICANS?; AND B) WHO ARE THE “INSTIGATING AUTHORS” BEHIND THESE R̲A̲P̲E̲ REPORTS?… AND, IS THERE A̲N̲Y̲ ̲V̲E̲R̲A̲C̲I̲T̲Y̲ TO THESE REPORTS? AND RE THE LATTER QUESTION, ANY SUBSTANTIVE PROOFS FROM MEDIA REPORTS THAT WOULD SUPPORT THE GUILT OF DONALD TRUMP, WOULD SUBJECT THE VERY F̲B̲I̲ (BUT, ETC.!) TO “JUSTIFIABLE LEGAL CROSS-EXAMINATION”, R̲E̲G̲A̲R̲D̲I̲N̲G̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲F̲B̲I̲’S̲ ̲C̲O̲M̲P̲L̲I̲C̲I̲T̲Y̲ I̲N̲ F̲E̲L̲O̲N̲I̲O̲U̲S̲ ̲C̲R̲I̲M̲E̲S̲… E.G., IN THEIR GREEN-LIGHTING OF DJ TRUMP’S 2016 U.S. FEDERAL ELECTION RUN, FOREKNOWING (AND, WHO SHOULD HAVE FOREKNOWN!) TRUMP’S COMPLICITY IN THE ALLEGATIONS BROUGHT FORWARD (I.E., AND IN THAT EVENT, IF THERE BE– AND INDEED!– ANY “U̲N̲T̲R̲A̲M̲M̲E̲L̲E̲D̲, A̲N̲D̲ ̲U̲N̲T̲A̲I̲N̲T̲E̲D̲” U.S. JUDICIOUS JUDICIAL JUDICARE, AND BRAVE AND IMPARTIAL “INTELLIGENCE” AGENCY/ POLICING AUTHORITY LEFT STANDING IN THE U.S.A., THAT WOULD BE ABLE TO ADDRESS SUCH FELONIOUS CONDUCT BY A FEDERAL INVESTIGATIVE BODY, SUCH AS THE F.B.I.!).
.
The dilemma for any CONSCIONABLE American Investigative Agency desiring to hold Donald Trump to Criminal Account (to start!), however, is weighing the implications of arresting “MR. POTUS (a.k.a., MR. PHEWTUS!)” in full Public view! Their difficulty is knowing precisely when and how to effect a PUBLIC ARREST!… and then, afterupon having done so, determining how best to safeguard innocent citizens from LEGIONS of W̲A̲R̲P̲E̲D̲ T̲R̲U̲M̲P̲I̲A̲N̲ ̲F̲O̲L̲L̲O̲W̲E̲R̲S̲! And, the FBI DARE NOT pursue– at least, yet!– whether there was a PAYOUT to the victim by Trump, for fear of inadvertently igniting civil unrest by these same hoards (e.g., like the White Supremacists of Charlottesville, and those that “storm trouped” the U.S. Congress on January 6, 2021!… BUT, ETC.!)!
.
Nevertheless!… and if the FBI can create a “window of opportunity” to effect an efficient and effective arrest, then the FBI should proceed to, DEFEND THE INTERESTS OF AMERICANS! But, if the FBI considers the Reports offered up by the Huffington Post (among others!) as, “FAKE NEWS”, THEN THE FBI SHOULD DO IT’S̲ DUTY, AND SHUT DOWN THIS BREACH OF THE U.S. FEDERAL STALKING STATUTEᶜ (AND THEREBY, THE BREACH OF THE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED SECURITY OF THE PERSON OF DONALD TRUMP/ MR. PHEWTUS!)!… AND, HOLD TO ACCOUNT THE “INSTIGATING/ INITIATING AUTHORS” OF THIS “FAKE NEWS (WHETHER ‘VICTIM SPUN’!… OR OTHERWISE!)”!
.
BUT!… if the Media Reports (OF WHATEVER LEGITIMATE STRIPE!) alleging Donald Trump’s involvement in C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ can’t be challenged (i.e., because, THESE REPORTS ARE “V̲A̲L̲I̲D̲ ̲N̲E̲W̲S̲”!)!… and the “victim” is “legally encouraged” to follow-through with her civic duty to finalize her EARNEST INVOCATION (by mandating Federal police protection for her!… AND!… BY REMINDING THE FBI, AND THE ALLEGED VICTIM OF THE CRIMINAL AND TORTIOUS NATURE OF COMMUNICATING F̲A̲L̲S̲E̲ ̲T̲E̲S̲T̲I̲M̲O̲N̲Y̲ BEFORE A COURT OF LAW; AND THUSLY– AND LIKEWISE!– OF THE CIVIL OBLIGATION TO COMPLETE A LEGAL PROCESS THAT WAS BASED UPON THAT TESTIMONY!)… then, the FBI is D̲U̲T̲Y̲ ̲B̲O̲U̲N̲D̲ to effect the needed Criminal Investigation into Donald J. Trump– and, effect any concomitant subsequent C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ ̲A̲R̲R̲E̲S̲T̲!
.
Freedom of the Press is one thing… but, Freedom to create “HAVOC (to breach the law!)” through “FAKE NEWS”, is quite another! And it’s this HAVOC!… this attempted “POLITICIDE (if, proven to be so!)”!… that the FBI– apparently, and supposedly!– is NOW preoccupied with (i.e., among other concerns!), and is attempting to stop! Nevertheless!… and despite the expressed V̲E̲R̲A̲C̲I̲T̲Y̲ of the evidence pertaining to MR. PHEWTUS reported by the alleged victim, and the Huffington Post (but, etc.!)!… the NEEDED FBI INVESTIGATION concerning the allegations involving PHEWTUS have yet to be given as much SERIOUS FBI CONSIDERATION as the reports of “FAKE NEWS”! Ummmm!
.
.
A̲t̲t̲e̲n̲t̲i̲o̲n̲ ̲C̲h̲r̲i̲s̲t̲g̲o̲p̲h̲e̲r̲: ̲A̲. ̲W̲r̲a̲y̲ ̲o̲f̲ ̲S̲u̲n̲s̲h̲i̲n̲e̲
.
.
In addition to Trump failing to sue CNN back in 2017, for CNN’s refusal to air Trump’s “PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT (the which, Trump would surely have LOST, as it would have been revealed that he was promoting a breach of the CONSTITUTIONALLY SANCTIONED Security of the Person of Americans!)”, Trump has also failed to legally challenge the aforenoted ALLEGED victim… who– again– has alleged that DJ Trump is GUILTY of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲!… and, he has also failed to sue the “FAUX NEWSERS”, which have “falsely reported” the C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ tale! And so, how can one– O̲F̲ ̲G̲O̲O̲D̲ ̲C̲O̲N̲S̲C̲I̲E̲N̲C̲E̲!– trust a wannabe Prez who screams “FAUX NEWS”, “FAUX NEWS”, “FAUX NEWS”!… and who would sue his neighbour’s housecat if given the chance!… but, would clam up tighter than a Contestant’s crotch on a segment of his The Apprentice, when challenged on his failure to pursue the said I̲L̲L̲E̲G̲A̲L̲I̲T̲Y̲ ̲O̲F̲ ̲A̲ ̲C̲L̲A̲I̲M̲ O̲F̲ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲! The reason is clear… T̲H̲E̲ ̲C̲L̲A̲I̲M̲ ̲I̲S̲ ̲L̲E̲G̲I̲T̲I̲M̲A̲T̲E̲!… A̲N̲D̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲R̲E̲M̲O̲V̲E̲D̲ ̲J̲A̲M̲E̲S̲ ̲C̲O̲M̲E̲Y̲, T̲R̲U̲M̲P̲, ̲A̲N̲D̲– I̲ ̲S̲U̲G̲G̲E̲S̲T̲!– T̲R̲U̲M̲P̲S̲ ̲C̲L̲O̲S̲E̲S̲T̲ ̲F̲A̲M̲I̲L̲I̲A̲L̲ A̲N̲D̲ ̲B̲U̲S̲I̲N̲E̲S̲S̲ ̲A̲L̲L̲I̲E̲S̲, ̲K̲N̲O̲W̲ ̲I̲T̲!
.
FBI Director, Christgopher!… if the allegation of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ against Donald Trump is C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ and T̲O̲R̲T̲I̲O̲U̲S̲… and advanced by a “FAUX VICTIM” and “FAUX NEWS MEDIA”!… then will you (a Director who had been Nominated by a President who was in a CONFLICT OF INTEREST when making your Appointment!… and, one who can be removed WITHOUT CAUSE– as Directors Serve at the “Pleasure” of POTUSES!… AND SO AND THUS, SUGGESTING THE NEED FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE FBI APPOINTMENT MECHANISM!)!– be going after this “FAUX VICTIM” for proffering C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ A̲N̲D̲ T̲O̲R̲T̲I̲O̲U̲S̲ C̲L̲A̲I̲M̲S̲ ̲O̲F̲ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲? And will you be pursuing the “FAUX MEDIA” for proffering C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲ A̲N̲D̲ T̲O̲R̲T̲I̲O̲U̲S̲ “N̲E̲W̲S̲” O̲F̲ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲?
.
Christgopher A. Wray, will you uphold your D̲U̲T̲Y̲ to protect America’s children and their families? Otherwise, it’s very hard to rationalize why the FBI would leave the alleged victim and her family “HIGH AND DRY (e.g., the ‘victim’ withdrew her allegation on November 4th, 2016, due to expressed fears for her safety… so stated her counsel!)”!… and conversely, it’s equally very hard to rationalize why the FBI would leave America’s children and families “HIGH AND DRY (i.e., in the FBI’s failure to go after this Trump-alleged ‘FAUX VICTIM’ for C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲L̲Y̲ A̲N̲D̲ T̲O̲R̲T̲I̲O̲U̲S̲L̲Y̲ giving false testimony re an allegation of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ on the one hand, and the failure of the FBI to pursue ‘FAUX NEWSERS’ for C̲R̲I̲M̲I̲N̲A̲L̲L̲Y̲ A̲N̲D̲ T̲O̲R̲T̲I̲O̲U̲S̲L̲Y̲ reporting C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ on the other!)”! And, how can such an A̲B̲S̲E̲N̲C̲E̲ ̲O̲F̲ ̲D̲U̲T̲Y̲ even make sense? And, why would we believe– should one believe!– that the FBI is SOO INCOMPETENT, that it would either fail to respond to a “VICTIM” of C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ (F̲O̲R̲ ̲W̲H̲I̲C̲H̲, ̲T̲H̲E̲R̲E̲ ̲C̲A̲N̲ ̲B̲E̲ ̲N̲O̲ ̲M̲O̲R̲A̲T̲O̲R̲I̲U̲M̲!) or fail to go after a “FAUX VICTIM” and “FAUX NEWSERS” who have alleged such a “FAUX CRIME”! A̲B̲S̲O̲L̲U̲T̲E̲L̲Y̲ ̲I̲N̲C̲R̲E̲D̲I̲B̲L̲E̲! And in Huffington Post’s report of Trump’s C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲ charges, a COURT JUDGE believed that there was SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE to ratify the sending of the concern to another court for Adjudication by late December, 2016! And so and thus, and to cut to the FBI DUTY, Christgopher!… A. Wray of sunshine!… if the said victim was P̲A̲I̲D̲ ̲O̲F̲F̲ (I.E., I̲F̲ ̲H̲U̲S̲H̲ ̲M̲O̲N̲E̲Y̲ ̲W̲A̲S̲ ̲O̲F̲F̲E̲R̲E̲D̲, A̲N̲D̲ ̲R̲E̲C̲E̲I̲V̲E̲D̲!), then will you be charging the once “FAUX VICTIM” for R̲E̲C̲E̲I̲V̲I̲N̲G̲ ̲A̲ ̲B̲R̲I̲B̲E̲, and Donald J. Trump, for O̲F̲F̲E̲R̲I̲N̲G̲ ̲A̲ ̲B̲R̲I̲B̲E̲, and for C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ R̲A̲P̲E̲/ C̲H̲I̲L̲D̲ ̲A̲B̲U̲S̲E̲?
.
And let us not forget, Christgopher!… A. Wray of sunshine!… that MR. PHEWTUS (if former NY Mayor, Rudolph William Louis Giuliani is to be believed!) is alleged to have “paid off” a “porn star” with whom Trump did “business”! (No wonder Trump is so popular, he’s a Rightist’s “man’s man”!… a “manly man”!… or a “LIBERAL man”?)
.
All the Best!
.
ᵃIn the New Testament’s Book of Romans Chapter 13: 1 and 2, we read the following:…
.
1) Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2) Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. [NIV]
.
(An important question to ask here, is why did God establish Donald J. Trump as Potus of America… indeed, why has God established other equally problematic rulers?)
.
In the New Testament’s Book of Mark Chapter 3: 23 to 27, we read the following:…
.
23) So Jesus called them over to him and began to speak to them in parables: “How can Satan drive out Satan? 24) If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. 25) If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand. 26) And if Satan opposes himself and is divided, he cannot stand; his end has come. 27) In fact, no one can enter a strong man’s house without first tying him up. Then he can plunder the strong man’s house…” [NIV]
.
To the matter… for TRUE Christians, it is clear that we are to be subject to that which is in authority. But, it’s also clear, that the PARAMOUNT AUTHORITY within a democratic country– at least!– is a country’s God-allowed respective National Constitution!… and which– invariably!– contains Rights and Freedoms (e.g., Freedom of Expression, Freedom of the Press, Security of the Person and EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW… BUT ETC.!). And to resist such… and in keeping with Romans 13: 1 and 2!… IS TO RESIST THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS GRANTED TO A COUNTRY’S PEOPLE THROUGH GOD’S SUPREME AUTHORITY; AND THEREBY, TO RESIST GOD AND HIS HOLY SPIRIT! And, in addition to the SUPREME AUTHORITY of our National Constitutions, is the PARAMOUNT AUTHORITY of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)… the signatories to which, are available for all too see.
.
Reader… and if I may!… let me offer up juxtaposed analogous relevant arguments and translations of Christ’s words conveyed in Mark Chapter 3, above…
.
1) How can Constitutional Supremacy cast out Constitutional Paramountcy? 2) If a Constitution’s premises be RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE in the context of it’s̲ entirety, that Constitution can’t stand. 3) If a Government is divided against itself, that Government can’t stand. 4) If a President opposes one’s self and is divided, such a soul can’t stand; that soul’s end has come. 5) And, in truth, no one can defeat a strong Constitution’s premises without first binding it’s̲ premises. Then one can defeat the said strong Constitution’s premises.
.
And thus, in accord with a prerequisite NON-RELATIVE, DEFINITIVE, CONSISTENT, NON-SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND INTEROPERABLE premise of EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW, a Constitution that cannot guarantee EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW for ALL CITIZENS within the scope of it’s̲ provisions is based upon a RELATIVE, NON-DEFINITIVE, INCONSISTENT, SELF-CONTRADICTORY AND NON-INTEROPERABLE premise of EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW!… and thusly, if state-wide interpretations of the scope the provision of EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW D̲E̲L̲I̲M̲I̲T̲S̲ EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND EQUAL BENEFITS BEFORE AND UNDER THE LAW– and the Constitution’s wording, in fact, supports that delimitation!– then that Constitution’s “egalitarian premise” is faulty, and EQUAL PROTECTIONS AND BENEFITS cannot be realized; and therefore, CONSTITUTIONAL PARAMOUNTCY is but RUSEFUL deference to STATE-WIDE DIVISIONS!
.
ᵇhttps://bit.ly/3xqGdRr (see also, https://bit.ly/3GVz9iB… re the Palermo Protocol)
.
ᶜThe Federal Stalking Statute (see, Federal Stalking Statute_18 U.S.C. §2261A) makes it a F̲E̲L̲O̲N̲Y̲ for persons to use any interactive computer service, or an electronic communication service or system (i.e., the FBI, CIA, NSA, the Media or FAUX VICTIM!), with the intent to kill, injure, HARASS, INTIMIDATE, or place under surveillance (through an official and/ or an unofficial proxy) another person, and engage in a course of conduct that places a person in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury, or CAUSES, ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE, OR WOULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS (e.g., LIKE THAT MADE KNOWN DURING THE 2016 U.S. FEDERAL ELECTIONS!)! And thus, if a FAUX VICTIM and/ or FAUX MEDIA FELONIOUSLY use an interactive computer service, or an electronic communication service or system, with the intent to kill, injure, HARASS, INTIMIDATE or place under surveillance (by way of an official and/ or an unofficial proxy!) a wannabe U.S. President, and engages in a course of activity that places said wannabe U.S. President in reasonable fear of death, or of serious bodily injury, OR CAUSES, ATTEMPTS TO CAUSE, OR WOULD REASONABLE BE EXPECTED TO CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, then it is incumbant upon the FBI (AND ANY OTHER DUTY BOUND INVESTIGATIVE AGENCY!) to end such a violation of the Federal Stalking Law! But, if it is found that such a FAUX VICTIM and/ or FAUX MEDIA H̲A̲S̲N̲’T̲/ H̲A̲V̲E̲N̲’T̲ VIOLATED… H̲A̲S̲N̲’T̲/ H̲A̲V̲E̲N̲’T̲ BEEN COMPLICIT!… in a breach of the Federal Stalking Statute… and because, the respective victim’s and/ or Media’s uses have been LEGIT!… then it’s incumbant upon the FBI to, “F̲O̲C̲U̲S̲ ̲O̲N̲ ̲T̲H̲E̲ ̲W̲A̲N̲N̲A̲B̲E̲”!
.
.
MAGAlomania: a Trumpian-Republican delusional mental illness that is marked by feelings of intrapersonal and conservative-interpersonal omnipotence and MAGA-grandeur.
.
TRUMPATHY: A Trumpian or Conservative instigation of sympathy for a Trumpian or Conservative faux news allegation, while publicly proffering a faux news report of the faux news allegation (for suggested inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM_MD-FIVE.ONE, of the American Psychiatric Association).
.
See, What is gaslighting, Audiopedia (place URL in the search bar for genmirror.com/ytp, and hit Enter… or use the abusive yt platform).
.
https://bit.ly/3A6dosN (Christgopher… A. Wray of sunshine)
LikeLike
John,
Comments of this length are not likely to be read to the end. In the future, I recommend shorter comments.
LikeLike
Shhhhh!
LikeLike
Fox personality, Rachel Campos-Duffy, described women’s rights and school shootings as
‘luxury issues’. (Raw Story, 6-12-2022). She attended a religious high school.
LikeLike
That is an astonishing comment. Did she mean that only the wealthy care about the lives of their children?
LikeLike
I’m curious if Fox would allow her to say that men’s rights are a luxury and, if the comment would get backlash.
She received criticism for a statement about immigration detention centers for children, a view that aligned with Republicans. Nikole Hannah-Jones has criticized her.
LikeLike
There are similarities between Coney Barrett and Campos-Duffy. Both attended religious high schools. Both of their youngest children have Downs syndrome. Neither has had a child following those births. Coney Barrett’s children number, 7 and Campos-Duffy’s number, 9.
If Supreme Court Justice Barrett Coney sides with gun rights advocates, we can presume their views about school shootings have commonality.
LikeLike
You are full of BS… The New Conservative party is about what American Values that have been there from the beginning. Its Republican RINOS now
LikeLike