Michael Gerson, former speechwriter for President George W. Bush, describes the response of Republicans to the first day of public hearings of the January 6 commission:
The Jan. 6 committee’s riveting televised opening night might not have converted the pro-Trump revisionists, but it has left them without excuses. The evidence is overwhelming that a sitting president gathered a violent mob and charged it with intimidating members of Congress and his own vice president into illegally reversing the outcome of a presidential election on the basis of an obvious lie.
There is only one narrative about Jan. 6 that history will accept: the evidence meticulously gathered and presented by the House select committee.
In some ways, pressing the case against former president Donald Trump is not hard, because he confirms its general outlines. He still seems to regard the riot as the highest expression of MAGA loyalty to his person. He still insists he should be reinstated as president. He still seems to believe then-Vice President Mike Pence was a weak-kneed traitor for refusing to overturn the constitutional order. Because Trump can’t admit error, he often effectively admits guilt.
The response of congressional Republican leaders to Thursday’s hearing — that it is more important to focus on inflation than sedition — has demonstrated their vast political and moral shallowness. The juxtaposition of testimony by U.S. Capitol Police officer Caroline Edwards (“I was slipping in people’s blood”) and a tweet from Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee account (“All. Old. News.”) was telling.
One imagines a 20-something GOP staffer straining (and failing) to be clever. The contrast between the police officer’s sacrifice and the tweeter’s infantile partisanship raises some questions: Is anyone teaching young Republicans that public service can be honorable and costly? Why doesn’t some mature public official shake these shills and urge silence in the presence of patriotic virtues they don’t possess?

“One imagines a 20-something GOP staffer straining (and failing) to be clever.”
When I call my despicable Senators’ offices and get a live voice – I always ask, “You must be smart – how can you work for this person?”
LikeLike
LOL. Perfect.
Here’s the one I used to use with telemarketers: “Thank you. Thank you so much for calling. It’s so wonderful to hear a human voice after all this time.”
LikeLike
Amen
LikeLike
One could argue that the Fascist Republican Party’s continued support for Traitor Trump’s BIG LIE while ignoring his crimes based on overwhelming facts is why many in America that never owned a firearm are buying them now and paying firing ranges to learn how to shoot.
I’m not talking about the extreme right’s mindless MAGA zombies still loyal to Traitor Trump. They already had their weapons of mass destruction.
I’m talking about liberals, progressive, and some moderates that also never owned a firearm before.
“They’re Afraid. They’re Buying Guns. But They’re Not Voting for Trump.
The drumbeat of national crisis is driving first-time gun sales across the country. The buyers aren’t who you might expect.”
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/10/25/first-time-gun-sales-not-voting-for-trump-430310
“Gun owners welcome a new addition to the club: Liberals”
https://minnesotareformer.com/2021/03/11/gun-owners-welcome-a-new-addition-to-the-club-liberals/
“Why US liberals are now buying guns too”
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38297345
I think if the extreme right led by the Fascist Republican party manages to take over the US and attempts to round up liberals first, and ship them off to labor camps, gas chambers and mass graves, they are going to be met with a hurricane of firepower.
I do not think these new firearm owners learning how to shoot straight are going to go like sheep to the slaughter.
On the other hand, to avoid a bloody Civil War and keep their firearms locked up, all they have to do is all turn out to vote in every election and never, never, never vote for a member of the Fascist Republican Party or anyone supported by ALEC.
LikeLike
Thanks for reminding us about ALEC, Lloyd.
ALEC is 50 years + old & not goin’ anywhere.
LikeLike
I posted a mangled, unclear version of this on another thread. Here, the edited one:
Merrick Garland recently told an interviewer that the Office of Legal Counsel memo preventing the DOJ from bringing charges against a president is “limited to acts while the person was in office.” This is profoundly disturbing.
What Garland didn’t say, there, was that the DOJ CAN bring charges against a FORMER president for criminal acts committed while he was president, that the memo refers ONLY to bringing charges while he is STILL president (this in itself is, and should be, a contentious issue).
Now, perhaps A.G. Garland simply misspoke. We all do this sometimes. Perhaps he did not mean to suggest that a president has immunity for ANYTHING he does while in office.
Note, however, that there are plenty of conservatives who are with Richard Nixon on this: “If the president does it, it’s not illegal.” or with the Man with No Plan and the Tan in the Can, the Idiot: “Then I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as president.”
Of course, that’s appalling. Utterly undemocratic. It gives to the president the powers of an absolute monarch. This is the same position taken by the Monarchists against whom we fought a Revolutionary War to establish a different kind of government. Surely, Mr. Garland does not agree with Hobbes that we all need to live under “a common power to keep [us] all in awe” or with Queen Elizabeth I, who wrote in 1601 that “The Royal Prerogative [is] not to be canvassed, nor disputed, nor examined, and [does] not even admit of any limitation.”
Surely, A.G. Garland does not think that a president is a king. Maybe he even knows that shortly after he was made president, George Washington entered a hall where Congress was meeting, they all stood, and he told them to sit down, that he was NOT a king.
Garland is the chief law enforcement officer of the United States. Does he think that the phrase Equal Justice Under Law is just, I don’t know, a marketing slogan, rather than being fundamental to our existence as a nation?
I read yesterday that so far the DOJ has charged 800 Dumbo Rambos for their illegal actions in the January 6th insurrectionary attempt to interfere with and prevent what is arguably most important official proceeding that we have in the United States—the one that carries out the peaceful transfer of power to the duly elected President. But what of the guy who was behind it all? What about the Teflon Don 2.0? Does he get a pass?
If so, then we are no longer even remotely a democracy. Stick a fork in the American experiment. It’s done.
LikeLike
I am so very afraid that you’ve hit the proverbial nail on its head, Bob. I try not to think too much about the 45th and his followers – would keep me from sleeping. A worse group of hypocrites who feel entitled and who think so little of the Constitution I have never seen. So many of the people who read and reply to this blog are able to cite chapter and verse of their perfidy do not need me to list everything again.
I was a child during the Cold War years with the “duck and cover” drills in school, but these times are far more scary than the Cold War ever was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m an old man. I won’t be around to see this. But I fear for my grandchildren. Will they live in a country that mouths hollow slogans about being a democracy but that operates like North Korea today, like Germany under Hitler, like the Soviet Union under Stalin? What I see is a precipitous slide toward precisely that–fascism wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross. A country with the freedom to espouse whatever Glorious Leader is saying today. A country of loyalty oaths to Glorious Leader. A police state with no distinction between the military, the intelligence services, and the police, all under the absolute command of Glorious Leader. A country in which “the rule of law” means rubber-stamped warrants against anyone who disagrees with or is said to disagree with Glorious Leader or The Party about anything and so is an “enemy of the state.” “L’état, c’est moi,”saith the Sun King.
LikeLike
Glorious Leader Who Shines More Orange Than Does the Sun
LikeLike
I don’t understand how anyone could come to the conclusion that the president has immunity for anything he does in office. Isn’t impeachment for “high crimes and misdemeanors”? If a president can do no wrong, then there is no crime and no need for impeachment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point!
LikeLike
Yes. It’s a completely idiotic conclusion.
Trump needs to be charged with
at least four counts of conspiracy to disrupt an official proceeding (four different means by which he tried to keep the count of the states’ electors’ votes from happening),
conspiracy to defraud the United States (by intentionally spreading the lie that the election was stolen),
and
seditious conspiracy (attempt to overthrow by preventing the seating of the lawful government of the United States)
These are very serious crimes, and clearly he committed each of them. Why should he get a pass when Joe Dumbo Rambo who followed him in one of these goes to prison?
LikeLike
the five (not four, as previously stated) counts of conspiracy to disrupt an official proceeding: 1. the “find some votes” conspiracy; 2. the conspiracy to pressure the Vice President to refuse to accept the electors’ votes; 3. the conspiracy to get courts baselessly to reject ballots in key states; 4. the insurrectionist mob conspiracy to raise and direct a mob to prevent the acceptance of the electors’ votes; 5. the false electors conspiracy to submit false electors’ votes to the Congress
LikeLike
Oops, I left out one:
the conspiracy to get the Supreme Court baselessly to throw out the election results in key states and turn the elections in those states to the Republican-controlled state legislatures
So, at least six different, parallel attempts to obstruct the official proceeding
LikeLike
Many of these were discussed by Steve Bannon on his podcast before January 6th.
LikeLike
Has Garland forgotten about Nixon & Watergate? WTF is he waiting for, 2024?
He really needs to be fired.
(Can Biden not do that?)
LikeLike
There would be no reason for Ford to pardon him if they felt he couldn’t be tried.
LikeLike
“If the President thinks it, it’s not idiotic” — Donald Trump
LikeLike
You don’t fire people who do what you tell them to do (and not to do).
LikeLike
Bmpop
Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Devic
LikeLike
Curious what any of you think this commission is actually going to do? Do you still hold visions of Trump being imprisoned? LOL. I still hold visions of Bush being imprisoned for needlessly killing a million people based on lies. But then, I still hold visions of winning the Powerball lottery….
LikeLike
Dienne,
Cynicism eats away at your peace of mind and your soul. No one has asked you to change your views. But you really should try to curb your bitterness. I worry about you.
LikeLike
Trump’s insurrection had a lot in common with Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch (carried out by incompetent ignoranuses and completely ineffective in both cases) but at least the German Weimar government had the good sense to charge Hitler with treason, even if they foolishly released him after just 9 months of a five year sentence.
Our own government (Republicans and Democrats) lacks even the sense to do the latter.
LikeLike