Bill Gates is singularly responsible for introducing charter schools into Washington State. He proposed the idea four times, and three times the voters said no. In 2012, he swamped the election with millions of dollars and glorious promises, and the measure passed. How are things working out for Bill and his friends? Not so well. Station KUOW in Seattle launched an investigation of the state’s largest charter chain and what the writer Ann Dornfeld found was broken promises.
In this post, she describes the charter chain’s cruel method of holding kids back in order to raise the chain’s test scores. Made the school look better at the expense of the students who were held back.
Dornfeld writes:
Art Wheeler’s daughter and son were thriving in the fall of their second year at Impact Puget Sound Elementary, a charter school in Tukwila, Washington. Their grades were high, Wheeler said, and they got glowing reports from their teachers.
“Your kids are standouts,” he recalled teachers saying. “They’re a pleasure to have in class.”
But two months into the school year, in November 2019, Wheeler said letters arrived from Impact saying his children were failing, and may have to repeat the year — the year that had just begun. Wheeler was confused. “They messed up,” he thought. “This is for somebody else’s kids.”
The holdback letters were, in fact, for Wheeler’s children. Others in their first- and second-grade classes had gotten them, too, teachers told him the next day, based on a single test, rather than students’ overall abilities. The teachers looked stricken, he said. One cried.
Three teachers told KUOW that they’ve had up to one-third of their students on the “promotion in doubt” list.
Impact said that its grade-retention practice is meant to ensure students master the material. Parents make the ultimate decision about whether to hold a child back, they said, and ultimately, only nine returning students — fewer than 3% — “chose to repeat a grade” in 2021.
But Baionne Coleman, a former Impact administrator, said its policy of sending grade-holdback letters was connected to funding.
Coleman said that Jen Davis Wickens, the co-founder and CEO of Impact, had been adamant that low-scoring students repeat the year.
“This is going to affect our third-grade scores,” Wickens said, according to Coleman.
Third grade is when students first take the state standardized reading and math tests. The state — and funders — use those test scores to determine whether a charter school has met its performance goals.
The tests are high-stakes: In 2021, Impact received a $10.1 million property loan from Equitable Facilities Fund, an organization focused on lending to charter schools. Loan documents include a covenant that students at Impact’s Tukwila school must outperform students in the surrounding school districts on the state math and reading tests.
Wickens declined multiple interview requests for this story and agreed to answer questions only via email through a spokesperson.
Hey, Bill Gates, this is a form of cheating. Are you proud of what you created?

Off topic, but survivors and parents of victims of the shootings in Uvalde and Buffalo mass shootings are testifying in the House today. Uvalde testimony is happening right now.
LikeLike
Off topic. Right off the bat. Is this something we should like or find interesting? Can all of us start posting about whatever we want?
If yes, I’ve got opinions about the upcoming Austria-France Nations League game on Friday. After Ralf Rangnick’s successful debut as Austria’s coach, will he, in the short time he’s been with the team, be able to translate and implement his idea of pressing? And if he can sustain it, does Austria become a favorite for Euro 2024? Will France begin to find the starting eleven who will defend the Word Cup title in Qatar later this year? And will Australia defeat Peru to qualify for the last available spot? In a normal world, one would expect Peru to win. But they keep getting caught off topic, so who really knows?
But while we’re off topic, might as well consider something substantive. Or irrelevant. Or any other topic completely dismissive of our host.
LikeLike
This person first started attacking me years ago every time I tried to point out that Eva Moskowitz and her charter network Success Academy used practices such as the ones mentioned by this excellent Seattle reporter whose journalistic skills shame the lazy, co-opted reporting of pro-charter talking points stenographers like Eliza Shapiro and Elizabeth Green.
This person was so determined NOT to acknowledge what John Merrow, Gary Rubinstein, and others had easily seen that I found it suspicious and back then I wondered if he did work for the charter or one of the PR or legal firms that found it lucrative to legitimize the false narratives that charters pushed. Even parents with kids in charters readily admit that their charters aren’t for every kid, but because that truth undermined the pro-charter narrative of “our charters work miracles”, there were some self-serving actors who for unknown and known reasons would not acknowledge that truth and instead tried to get people to believe the lie that the charter welcomed all students. So maybe this post and the abhorrent practices of the Washington state charter chain hit a nerve?
LikeLike
Greg, didn’t Diane tell you to knock off this stuff? Oh, and I see your little buddy’s joined. You really are incapable of stopping.
LikeLike
FLERP, please ignore provocations. You s add re better than that.
LikeLike
My post was about the topic at hand. Charter schools that use reprehensible tactics like flunking kids they don’t want to teach (over and over again if necessary) until they leave.
It doesn’t surprise me that you wouldn’t condemn this, or that you don’t want to present yourself as someone who condones this. For all I know you haven’t yet made up your mind as to whether you think it is terrific that the Washington state charters are using this tactic of forcing kids to repeat years (thus encouraging many to leave).
But if you change the subject because it isn’t one you want to discuss, it raises questions, and it is fair game to point that out. Honestly, if Greg’s post didn’t hit a nerve you would either ignore it, or defend yourself. Instead you just act like Republicans and go on the attack when the topic isn’t one you want to discuss.
I happen to think it’s pretty interesting that supposedly non-profit charters dump kids this way. I would be interested in hearing your own opinion about this.
But if you prefer not to offer your own opinion on this charter practice of holding kids back that is the topic of this post, that speaks for itself.
LikeLike
NYCPSP, please stop feuding with FLERP. It really is boring and of no interest to anyone.
LikeLike
“if you prefer not to offer your own opinion on this charter practice of holding kids back that is the topic of this post, that speaks for itself.”
LikeLike
Must outperform on reading and math? Or what? Extra interest? They pull the loan? This is all nefarious.
LikeLike
Oh some quick searching reveals the Equitable Facilities Fund is supported by The Walton Foundation
LikeLike
It’s ALL about SIB’s (social impact bonds). Data is the only way to keep gov’t (tax payer $$$$)funds flowing into private entities.
LikeLike
The function of this retention is actually to acculturate the failures into believing the lie perpetrated about their ability. The
Lie? The test is a balanced arbiter.
The burden is on the test. Let it prove it is a balanced arbiter before it ruins children.
LikeLike
The SUNY Charter Institute trustees in New York reward and lavish praise on charters like Success Academy that have used similar tactics, so it is certainly understandable that a Washington State charter would be pressured to use these tactics in search of the same kind of praise and rewards.
Maybe this charter chain sent their educators to learn from the “best” folks around when it comes to these kinds of tactics. Eva Moskowitz got millions from a right wing billionaire to fund Success Academy’s Robert Center “For Educators in Pursuit of Extraordinary” — training other charter networks who want to learn how to make the percentage of students who pass standardized tests extraordinarily high. And this seems like a tactic right out of her playbook.
Clearly Ann Dornfeld, at station KUOW in Seattle, needs to talk to Eliza Shapiro at the NYT and Elizabeth Green at Chalkbeat NY, who can fill her in about how what she is doing is NOT acceptable journalism in their eyes. Eliza Shapiro and Elizabeth Green can explain that what matters is not the students who disappear (and they would deny that those students not mattering has anything to do with the fact that the disappearing students are usually low-income and Black and Latino). What matters is the “miracle” that a charter school has extremely high percentages of students who perform at or above grade level or graduate with a college acceptance. It is simply not newsworthy in their eyes if such a “miracle” is achieved by the mysterious disappearance of an extraordinarily high percentage of students who enroll at that charter, and Eliza Shapiro and Elizabeth Green can explain that attrition rates, or extremely high flunking (i.e. “retention”) rates should never be mentioned when writing a fawning story that focuses only on the worthy students who remain whose success is due entirely to the charter.
It’s interesting that the Seattle charter did have parents simply refusing to have their kid held back. Certainly that charter needs to send more of their educators to the Robert Center “For Educators in Pursuit of Extraordinary” to learn how to make sure that 100% of the parents whose kids are put on “got to repeat a year” lists get the message and either have their kid repeat a year (or two, or three, or four…) or leave the charter permanently.
Elizabeth Green and Eliza Shapiro can explain to Ann Dornfeld that this is something ADMIRABLE that gets the results their own fawning writing constantly celebrates. They can explain that they themselves never thought it was worth mentioning because they simply assumed – without bothering to do a lick of reporting – that the parents whose kids left decided they wanted their kid to be poorly educated, and they can explain that they were absolutely certain – without bothering to do a lick of reporting – that the high percentage of kids who were flunked were flunked because of their own personal failings and their poorly trained teachers had nothing to do with it.
I hope Ann Dornfeld is the future of education reporting and those two I mentioned stop pretending to practice journalism and go off and get jobs doing the PR for charters that they are so good at doing.
LikeLike
^^^RobertSON Center
LikeLike
“Staff said many students unenrolled after receiving a holdback letter. After grade hold-back letters went out in November 2019, two dozen students unenrolled in the next couple months, state records show. In those records, Impact summarized nine students’ reasons for leaving: “Family does not agree with school’s policies and practices.”
Ding ding ding about what the “hold back” letter really wants. TWO DOZEN STUDENTS!!! Leaving in the middle of the year??
Nothing newsworthy here, Eliza Shapiro and Elizabeth Green. Continue reporting how awed you are about 99% graduation rates and high passing rates on state tests because the student who leave the highest performing charter school network in the state are invisible to you. They do not matter.
Those kids matter to Ann Dornfeld because she is a journalist. Which means questioning when things don’t small right, not simply normalizing what doesn’t small right because someone with power tells you it’s okay and that the people who object don’t count.
LikeLike
I commented in Part 1 with a link to a video that really belonged with Part 2, come to think of it.
LikeLike