The Washington Post points out that the Florida GOP, then led by Governor Rick Scott, passed gun control legislation after the Marjory Stoneman Douglas massacre.
But now Senator Scott and the rest of the Senate Republicans are opposed to passing similar federal gun control measures.
After a teenage gunman killed 19 fourth-graders and two teachers inside a Texas elementary school Tuesday, Democrats on Capitol Hill quickly lamented Republican lawmakers’ years of intransigence on gun control.
“No matter the cause of violence and no matter the cost on the families,” Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Thursday, “nothing seems to move them.”
But that broadside wasn’t entirely accurate: Not long ago, GOP lawmakers bucked ferocious pressure from the National Rifle Association to pass significant new gun restrictions after a deadly school shooting, which were then signed into law by a fiercely conservative Republican.
It just didn’t happen in Washington.
Three weeks after 17 people were gunned down in 2018 inside Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., then-Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) signed into law a bill that included provisions banning weapons sales to those younger than 21, imposing a three-day waiting period on most long-gun purchases, and creating a “red flag” law allowing authorities to confiscate weapons from people deemed to constitute a public threat.
The NRA’s powerful leader in the state, Marion P. Hammer, condemned Republicans backing the bill as “betrayers.” But 75 out of 99 GOP lawmakers voted for it anyway, and Scott — who was preparing to seek a U.S. Senate seat — signed it, calling the bill full of “common-sense solutions.” Other provisions of the bill included $400 million for mental health and school security programs, and an initiative, fiercely opposed by Democrats, that would allow teachers and school staff to be trained as armed “guardians…”
Interviews this week with Republican senators revealed little stomach for the sort of sprawling bill that Florida Republicans passed in 2018. None said they are open to a federal waiting period. Some are curious about “red flag” laws but skeptical about their implementation on the federal level. And asked about age limits for rifle purchases, one key GOP negotiator, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) said, “I don’t think that’s on the table.”
Scott himself — who went on to narrowly defeat Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) in 2018, even after his NRA rating was downgraded from an A-plus to a C — said this week that he does not favor passing a federal version of the Florida law.
“It ought to be done at the state level,” he said. “Every state’s going to be a little bit different. … It worked in Florida, and so they ought to look at that and say, could that work in their states?”

My, how these people change when they decide to run for president! Scott, ofc, is seeking, now, to be a Trump Mini-me, with his eyes on the 2024 election.
Same happened with Romney when he was running for president. Romney is the guy who, as governor of Massachusetts, created for his sttate the legal framework that became, on the national level, the Affordable Care Act. In other words, this was Romneycare before it was Obamacare. But, ofc, when he decided that he needed to be in the Oval Office, he started trashing HIS OWN PROGRAM.
LikeLike
In other words, he came out strongly against what was, no doubt about it, his own created political achievement, one conceived by him and implemented across the aisle.
LikeLike
Given that Florida is a sort of extreme version of the whole country, is Scott’s reticence regarding these steps reflective of an increased bunker mentality on the part of his constituency? I feel his side of the electorate moving so quickly toward a posture of complete dismissal of their philosophical opposition that I despair of peaceful transition of power in our government.
LikeLike
yes, it is
LikeLike
Bob: what you describe is the haste with which we see the American right is running into radicalism. Formerly a place where rational representatives could come to compromise solutions to problems, we have become a nation where one political party refuses even laws that they desire.
LikeLike
yup; it’s civil war but just hasn’t been declared yet, or so these fools seem to think
LikeLike
This site compares firearm control laws by state. California has the toughest laws and is ranked #1. The state with the worst laws and little or no protection is Mississippi, ranked #50.
https://everytownresearch.org/rankings/
Yet, I live in California, and legally own several firearms, that I keep locked in a weapons safe that’s bolted to the house so no thief may easily steal the safe without breaking into it.
But, even though I could legally buy an AR-15 in California, I don’t have one and that is my choice.
LikeLike
At this point the best means of getting to meaningful gun control may be a good guy with a gun . If Black Lives Matter demonstrators, Antifa and all us dreaded SOCIALISTS showed up in force looking like a Right Wing militia, watch how quickly we see a National assault weapons ban. Sadly I am being only a bit sarcastic.
LikeLike