Christopher Hooks of the Texas Monthly attended Trump’s latest tour date in Texas and reviewed the show. It seems to be a political revival show, with expensive tickets and opportunities to spend more money, with no explanation of what the money’s for. You really should subscribe to the Texas Monthly. It’s informative and delightful about a politically key state.
On Saturday, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee came to Austin to speak at a day-long conference attended by some six or seven thousand of his most passionate fans and supporters. In Ye Olden Days, that first sentence would be followed by a description of the future candidate’s remarks on politics and policy. But this has never been the way to cover a Donald Trump speech, and yesterday there wasn’t any new material. The only mystery was why his fans would wait for so long to see him, lining up before dawn to secure good seats.
Saturday’s riffs included an extended description of the contracting process for the replacement of Air Force One, and the story of how Trump crushed ISIS with the help of a general he identified only as “Raisin’ Cain.” I have been to a dozen or so Trump rallies, and these are stories I’ve heard several times. As had members of the audience, apparently: when Trump described how nervous he was flying into Iraq to visit troops, a man called out the punch line—“perhaps I should have been given a medal”—before Trump got there. When the former president caught up, the man laughed twice as hard as his neighbors.
Far more interesting were Trump’s supporters and allies. The conference, featuring speakers such as rock musician Ted Nugent and attended by allies such as Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, showed a movement falling deeper into a suffocating circle of televangelist-adjacent scammery—while its adherents grow ever more comfortable with the idea of the need for violence to triumph over their political opponents. Things are going great, in other words.
In late January, Trump held a rally in Conroe at the high point of the Texas’s GOP primary season. That rally, like most of the former president’s, was held by the joint fund-raising committee of Save America, an extension of Trump’s former (and possible future) campaign. Huge billboards hawked Trump’s new book, but the event was relatively civic-minded. He read, from the teleprompter, a careful speech endorsing all the requisite Texas GOP candidates.
By contrast, the event Saturday in Austin, at the city’s convention center, was a project of the American Freedom Tour, a for-profit traveling show that brings speakers to MAGA-heads around the country. The purpose is not to back candidates or even to get out the vote but to sell tickets. Trump was the headliner, while the undercard was filled out with relative heavyweights like former secretary of state Mike Pompeo and lighter weights, such as Kevin Sorbo, the actor who once starred in the nineties shlock show Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. While the turnout of seven thousand might not be impressive in another context, it was large given that each attendee had paid quite a bit to be there. The cheapest tickets, for the seats at the very, very back of the warehouse space, sold for between $45 and $95.
Attendees could purchase a seat halfway to the stage with a ticket at the “VIP” or “Delegate” level, at some $800 to $1,000, respectively. Both came with access to a breakfast with Dinesh D’Souza—the conservative filmmaker whose new work, 2000 Mules, makes the case that the 2020 election was stolen—and an invitation to an afterparty with Donald Trump Jr. Only the Delegate level, though, came with a “Full Color American Freedom Tour Program,” which turned out to be a mostly blank booklet in which attendees were encouraged to write notes about speakers’ remarks. The best seats, however, were reserved for the “Presidential” ticket holders, who paid some $4,000. As it turned out, attendees could actually pretty much sit anywhere. I walked in without a wristband and sat in an empty seat that was supposed to cost $3,000.
With this kind of cash exchanging hands, you might think that the American Freedom Tour was a fundraiser for conservative causes. Many folks who shelled out for a ticket doubtless expected this to be the case. But there is no information anywhere on the tour website about how the proceeds will be distributed. It is not a PAC, of course. The money goes to the speakers—including Trump and Trump Jr., presumably—and the folks who put the rally together.
The only stated goal of the American Freedom Tour is to hold more incarnations of the American Freedom Tour. Its website’s FAQ doesn’t explain exactly what the money is used for, but it does helpfully emphasize that no recording of any kind is allowed inside. There is a cursory “our values” page that explains that the four pillars of American Freedom are “faith, family, finance, and freedom,” which each are given a short paragraph. “Men, in particular our fathers and husbands,” it says, “are under attack, being maligned and parodied in popular culture.”
In the past, I’ve written that the marketplace for well-compensated speakers and evangelists for the right—sometimes derided by the left as an ecosystem of “grift”—is an enormous asset for conservatives. If oleaginous liberal would-be demagogues could make a healthy living touring the country, all the while firing up Democrats in tent rallies, the party might be in a better place. But there are limits, man. My jaw dropped a little when Brian Forte, CEO of the American Freedom Tour, got on stage for a fund-raising appeal for his own company. A giant QR code appeared on screen directing attendees to a donation page, and the older folks around me struggled to make it work. Forte, a thirty-year veteran of the motivational speaking industry, was asking for money from attendees who had already paid to be there.
He did it in unbelievable terms. “Freedom is not free! Think about that,” he told the audience, appropriating a phrase typically used to refer to the sacrifice made by dead American soldiers. He urged the audience to donate at least $20 for Trump’s sake, but the donation page offered options of up to $5,000. “You can’t afford to not do this,” he reasoned, “because America is at stake!”
He went on. “If you see someone next to you who does not have their phone out,” he said, give them the hard sell. “Tap them on the shoulder and say, ‘Come on, let’s do this together.’ Go ahead and do that now. Everyone should have their phone out.”
He wasn’t done. “This is your chance. We need you now. The president needs you now! America needs you now! It’s now or never! We’re warriors on the front lines to save America,” he said. “This is a battle between good and evil!”
The spiel went on for several more minutes, without Forte ever saying what the donations were for. Anyone who has ever been exposed to an evangelist of the Righteous Gemstones variety recognizes this kind of preaching. “Give me money and you’ll get into heaven” becomes “give me money and the country will be saved,” and it’s a more effective approach when you don’t explain the how.

PT Barnum would be proud.
LikeLike
Diane TICKETS? Thinking about these people’s intellectual and moral comportment is like thinking about a very large puzzle we once had that ended up with several crucial pieces gone missing. CBK
LikeLike
Christine Dictionary could use Trump’s picture. They could put it right next to description of “GRIFTER.” CBK
LikeLike
I can’t believe (or can I?) that people still follow this guy or the amount of suckers that still think he’s some type of “savior” for America. Then again, taken from a George Carlin perspective: yes–I can believe it…if we take a really close look at what passes for “values” in our country and from where said values come.
LikeLike
Yossarian My long-term argument is that one of the biggest problems that many on the left wallow in is self-projection: OF, first up, a basic reasonability, and second: reasonability as applied to a modicum of moral/ethical development.
Leave out the self-delusion of self-projection, and we find those missing pieces among the so called MAGA and Trump followers are not without a vacuum for all sorts of degeneracy that, as absence, is particular to the powers of human beings. CBK
LikeLike
What does this have to do with the left? The left isn’t the least bit interested in Trump. If you want the left’s vote, you have to offer something. We don’t vote just because “not Trump”.
LikeLike
dienne77 DELETED without reading CBK
LikeLike
How about
the right for a woman to control her own reproduction?
rebuilding our country’s infrastructure?
child tax credits?
the invocation of the Defense Production Act to ensure sufficient baby formula?
free Covid vaccinations and tests?
extended unemployment benefits for those affected by Covid?
a halt on federal executions?
rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement?
overturning the Trump ban on trans service members?
protection of national parks and monuments?
then thank Joe Biden, and thank whatever god you worship (Stalin?) that Putin’s dog, Trump, is not still in office.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If Putin had a solid majority in Congress and a handful of decent Republicans, Biden’s Build Back Better would have passed, rebuilding our country.
LikeLike
The most alarming thing about these Trump rallies (and there are a whole host of alarming things when it comes to Trump and his goon squad) is that people are showing up in numbers, they are still buying his dreck and cheering on this vile lying liar as if he were a rock star. Trump is such an obvious grifter and con artist, wasn’t 4 years of his incompetent horror show enough?! Well, yes, Biden did win, thanks be to the proper alignment of the stars and planets.
LikeLike
literally BUYING his dreck
LikeLike
It is hard to understand the loyalty of Trump’s fans. He continues to control the Republican party, and unfortunately several of his supported candidates did win their primaries. The sad truth is that Trump is an elitist that would want nothing to do with most of his voters that are not wealthy. The right accuses the left of “identity politics.” There is no greater escapade of identity politics than the cartoonish Trump, the professional self-promoter and grifter.
LikeLike
Trump is a snob. He would never let any of his slavish devotees into Mar-a-Lago. Unless they were billionaires.
LikeLike
Trump’s snobbishness is sooooooo funny because his tastes are so unsophisticated. Years ago, I had a drink in the Green Mill Lounge, in Chicago, which had been meticulously preserved to look as it did when Al Capone used to hang there. Statues of naked women. Red velvet curtains. A mobster’s idea of “high class.”
LikeLike
I think the Idiot vainly aspires to be a snob. I mean, that even takes a little refinement, or at least the ability to fake it.
LikeLike
Yossarian and retired teacher- additional insight into understanding Trump’s appeal
The difference between west coast and east coast Straussians is explained In Geoff Kabaservice’s lengthy interview of Laura K. Fields (“The Roots of Reactionary Conservatism”, 8-4-2021, Niskanen Center). Laura Field is a scholar at American University. The west coast Straussians expected Trump (Great Man ideology), “to
slay,” PC and the administrative state. The east coast segment differed, viewing Trump as a threat to constitutional arrangements and societal stability.
The article mentions Michael Pack, who was formerly an executive at PBS and a Trump-appointed head of the US Agency for Global Media. Diane wrote about him 10-30-2020. Critics warned he was a danger, “to LGBTQ and civil rights activists around the globe.” The article describes the influence of Hillsdale College faculty and administrators and those at the Claremont Institute. Names mentioned include, Michael Anton, Larry Arnn and John Eastman. Other names mentioned include, Sohab Amari, Charles Kesler and Harry Jaffa (inserted into Goldwater’s acceptance speech, “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.”
Fields describes the difference between the 1776 Commission and the 1619 project. The former is cast by the right wing as a document that claims title to doctrine for America. The latter’s goal is to contribute to understanding.
In a summary statement, Kabaservice quotes Keynes, “men are usually slave to some defunct economist.”
At about Kabaservice’s 12th response, via a throw off comment, he states an influence that is obvious. But, one that is denied by some.
LikeLike
Linda Is there a link, or did I miss it?
Also, you write “At about Kabaservice’s 12th response, via a throw off comment, he states an influence that is obvious. But, one that is denied by some.”
Ho humm. May I presume a not-so-hidden swipe at Catholicism?
If so, you miss AGAIN, that no one that I know of, including myself, “denies” the present “influence” of the severely concerted RIGHT WING of the Catholic Church, especially here in America. As a Catholic, I remain mortified by its totalitarian and even personally self-serving antics and obvious intent to overthrow secular government. I know, as do many, it’s THAT serious.
It’s rather your purveying your own one-sided bias into the arguments that bothers me (e.g., I MUST be in denial because I disagree with you on your concerted overplay by way of absences, not to mention attitude) and whole-piece rejection of anything Catholic, not to mention religious.
Here’s my “throwaway line”: Your hair-on-fire Catholic bashing bothers me in the same way ignorance of the whole bothers me with someone like Dienne77 whose consciousness floats and has no ground. But of course, if you didn’t MEAN to imply “Catholic” in your note, I take it all back. CBK
LikeLike
As a Catholic, I remain mortified by its totalitarian and even personally self-serving antics and obvious intent to overthrow secular government.
Thank you, CBK
LikeLike
Bob About Catholic totalitarianism as a well-defined camp within the Catholic Church:
I’ve rung that bell here MANY TIMES before; but it’s a distinction that Linda refuses to hear. She’s not alone. Nevertheless, she is too busy lighting her hair on fire and screaming GOTCHA! about idiots that do have Catholic backgrounds, as if that’s all there is. . . maybe that’s so . . . in her mind. CBK
LikeLike
Yeah, it’s definitely not all Mel Gibson out there! I taught in a Catholic school years ago. The Sisters of Charity I taught with were amazing, warm, generous, loving, hard-working people. And though they were pretty apolitical, they definitely leaned left.
LikeLike
They were, for example, vehemently anti-racist.
LikeLike
Bob Yes, SOME do keep the Sermon on the Mount and the parables close to the chest, aka heart, not to mention the Old Testament’s ode to love. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did you mean to type New Testament, as in 1 Cor. 13? I think so.
LikeLike
Bob Caught me. I”m lapsed. But there is also the Psalms and reams of other narratives about love throughout. (Am I covered?) CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do that ALL the time, CBK! Go and sin no more. LOL.
LikeLike
OK, that I definitely take back! LOL!
LikeLike
in North Korea or, as SomeDAM Poet puts it, Desantistan. I ❤ that! I do hope SomeDAM’s coinage there catches on!
LikeLike
Or, as Trump would say, Two Corinthians. LOL. Or as Trump wouldn’t say, “Two Corinthians walk into a bar. The first says, ‘I’ll have a kykeon, straight up.’ The second smiles and says, ‘Atë, boy.'”
LikeLike
Better: Atë, boi!
LikeLike
https://www.niskanencenter.org/the-roots-of-reactionary-conservatism-with-laura-k-field/
LikeLike
Thanks, Bob
My view –
At my low pay grade, my condemnation of an organization I belonged to for its political successes resulting in anti-public education (and, anti-gay, anti-democracy, anti- woman) polices and laws would be meaningless or, close to it.
On the other hand, a well-read media outlet or blogs in education or politics that posted about the almost 50 state campaign of my organization to privatize schools (and, which billionaire they had aligned with) would have an extremely positive impact in fighting back. The church, mosque, temple or synagogue membership of the blog host or investigative journalist would be of no relevance to the readers.
LikeLike
Linda Your note to Bob is code for: “Linda excuses herself for airing her bias on this site,” when she is actually shooting herself in the foot.
But here is a link to a much more liberal-thinking Catholic online magazine. Unless you have visited this or other sites, and listened to some of their podcasts, like most anything else you don’t know about, it might make you look like the dogmatist you are if you air your biased judgments about all Catholics online. Go ahead . . . make my day. CBK
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org
LikeLike
It’s all good, Linda. A.S. Neil, the Summerhill guy, said, “Kids are noisy. If you don’t like noise, don’t teach.” Well, I think that the same thing can be said of democracy. Democracy is noisy. People will wrangle. If you don’t like noise, go live in North Korea. This back and forth among opposing views is valuable and important.
LikeLike
Bob-
We agree, conflict is essential for positive change.
In a different vein, people whose emotional experiences haven’t been safe will respond in certain ways and, because we haven’t walked in their shoes….
LikeLike
I think of all those abused kids through the years, Linda, and I weep.
LikeLike
Yes, Bob
LikeLike
Whoa, Linda! Did you just dismiss CBK emotion tinged reaction with amused derision because she reacted with other than scholarly detachment from the topic as, of course, you display consistently? Forgive me if I misread your intentions, but I hope you plan to follow the link she provided to commonweal magazine.
LikeLike
Agreed, Speduktr
LikeLike
Bob and speduktr
Would a frequent commenter have a right or reason to expect that his/her character be viewed through the lens of the entirety of the record of the person’s replies (or, lack thereof)?
I’m just curious if you think a person in my position should be offended by the repeated, personal attacks? Am I expected and obligated to defend against the well- worn anti-Catholic labeling and, am I required to position myself as neutral to the origin of successful, right wing political activities? Given my record of measured replies, is it reasonable for me to be puzzled by others who draw a conclusion that I am making fun of a commenter for my own amusement?
I make no apology for bringing awareness to the erosion of civil rights at the hands of highly visible right wing religious.
IMO, there should be great concern about a network of media and influencers that acquiesces to one religion while tarring the other major one engaged in anti-woman, anti-gay, anti-democracy political activities.
One final curiosity- the type of allegations made against me when I present evidence, is it possible that that provides explanation for why
only one of the two major right wing religion’s politicization receives attention?
LikeLike
Linda,
Your critique of rightwing Catholic activities is spot on. I think it gets problematic when it appears that you are attributing the bigoted views of the hierarchy to all Catholics. My wife is RC, and she is a social Justice Catholic.
I wish you would give equal attention to the evangelicals.
LikeLike
Diane,
Thank you for the acknowledgement of the issue and for permitting me to post.
From Pew data- a sizable minority, 37% of white Catholics who attended church regularly, were opposed to Trump’s 2020 presidency. In central states, info. seems to suggest a higher rate for GOP support in state and local races. In measuring political success, we can look at the conditions that led to the Espinosa and Biel decisions. We can look at the self-owned achievements of the state Catholic Conferences in school privatization and abortion legislation in states. We can also get a picture of social justice’s record- a steady decline in unionization, a substantial rise in income inequality and racial discord, a failure to pass nationalized healthcare and to humanely address the southern border crisis. The preceding listed gains, erosions and humanitarian failures reflect GOP accomplishments.
Roe’s overturn is a misogynistic goal. Within the religious sector, opposition to abortion and pharmaceutical birth control has long been a primary issue for the Catholic Church. As recently reported, Frank Schaefer and his father showed evangelical religious leaders the value of a pivot to Roe’s opposition. The Bible does not mention abortion. It refers to life beginning at first breath.
Relative to the two most recent Ravitch posts about the right wing, I pondered the following, if I belonged to an organization that prohibited black people from leadership positions and the organization worked to take away the rights of black people… how would acceptance of that differ if it was instead, women discriminated against and the organization was attached to an 8 letter word.
LikeLike
One can think of it as the MAGA rightwing version of the Aspen Ideas festival. The reason the left does not have an equivalent is that the left has the massive think tank/conference industry behind it.
LikeLike
You couldn’t be more correct.
LikeLike
Trying to make sense of this comment. It’s the right in the United States that has lots and lots of extraordinarily well-funded “think tanks,” where thinking tanks.
LikeLike
If one is in DC, the number of conservative think tanks can be counted on one hand. There are dozens of liberal think tanks.
LikeLike
That’s not true. There are several very wealthy, very powerful conservative think tanks in DC:
The Heritage Foundation
American Enterprise Institute
CATO
Thomas B. Fordham
There is only one liberal think tank, which does not have the wealth of any one of the big conservative think tanks:
Economic Policy Institute
On education, there are no other liberal think tanks in DC. Do not suggest Brookings. It has a long tradition of choosing conservatives (me, Grover Whitehurst) to lead its education program.
LikeLike
Superdestroyer, the conservative think tanks like AEI, the Heritage Foundation, ALEC, and the Federalist Society and EXTREMELY wealthy and extremely powerful. Just look at the consequences of the Federalist Society’s lists of potential judicial appointments. That alone is extremely dramatic. Or look at the sheer amount of legislation passed in the states based upon ALEC templates. You have no case. One of the BIG problems that progressives have is that they do not have equally powerful equivalents.
LikeLike
The right has ALEC, AEI, Heritage, CATO, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, the Heartland Institute, the State Policy Network, and dozens more “think tanks, “ at least one in every state, supported by rightwing billionaires
LikeLike
Aspen’s funded by neoliberal billionaires- think, Republican lite.
Libertarian Bill Gates funds Aspen’s Pahara Institute and he favors regressive taxes that force the poor and working class to support government more heavily.
LikeLike
A moment ago, I finished reading a Quora Q&A on this topic, and the best part of the answer said anyone still handing their money to Traitor Trump is “terminally stupid,” because Trump keeps most of that money for himself, not to “save” MAGA American.
So, anyone that’s sticking to MAGA America is terminally stupid, and there is nothing we can do about it because there are not enough mental hospitals to house these dangerous terminally insane MAGA morons.
From what I’ve read, the traitor is going to use this money to keep up with his payments on the MASSIVE loans he owes and if he defaults, he might end up living in poverty and even homeless.
But I don’t think the traitor will ever be homeless. He’ll either end up in jail or living with the wealthiest terminally stupid millionaire or billionaire that’s a member of the traitor’s MAGA cult.
LikeLike
Two conservative, religious women who are Michigan GOP state representatives, Rep. Jacky Eubanks and Rep. Daire Rendon, are in the news. The first announced she would vote to eliminate access to birth control and the second, backs the Big Lie.
LikeLike
Linda “Two conservative women . . . ”
Well, you can join with Trump in his historically ignorant assignations: I guess, it follows from your all-too frequent references in your notes: the Catholic Church has always been and will forever be a religious sxxthxxe. You can join Trump in winning prize for “an incredible example of bias.” Congratulations! CBK
LikeLike
It can change. It is changing. Pope Francis is not Father Coughlin!!! Not by a loooooooooooong shot.
LikeLike
Normally I avoid cliché like the plague (!) but “a fool and his money soon part” seems an apt response to this article.
LikeLike
exactly
LikeLike
Lifesite News posted a positive review of D’Souza’s movie, 2000 Mules. The bio of the reviewer is in paragraphs following the review.
Others describe the movie as D’Souza’s failed attempt to demonstrate rampant illegality surrounding the 2020 election.
Wikipedia describes D’Souza’s background.
LikeLike
D’Souza is what passes, on the right, for an intellectual, which shows you how low the bar is. Big money in that, too.
LikeLike
D’Souza was imprisoned and Trump pardoned him.
LikeLike
Yup. Campaign finance fraud. But most of the five-year sentence was probation.
LikeLike
A funny critique of David Brooks, “The only role the David Brookes of our country fill is one of wish fulfillment for serious people of the left and center who wish they had had someone more serious to debate with the other side.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
HAAAAA!!!! That’s priceless, Linda!!!!
LikeLike
It’s funny that when the right wants to trot out an intellectual, now, who is still with the program, they have to reach for the likes of D’Souza. So, there are job opportunities there for folks with no morals and functioning brains, as there always are in the cult leader biz.
LikeLike
The allegations of D’Souza’s wife never made it to court?
LikeLike
Boeing CEO Regrets Deal With Trump For New Air Force One Jets That Will Now Cost Company $1 Billion. 5/18 investors were told that Boeing made a “Very Unique Deal” with Dump/Trump for 2 Air Force One 747 jets.
The deal placed liability for cost increases/changes on the company rather than on the USA taxpayers.
Boeing should not have taken the fixed-price $3.9 billion contract.
The Air Force One deal was personally negotiated with Trump by THEN Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg, who was removed from the company in 2019 after being accused of mismanaging the company’s response to two deadly 737 MAX plane crashes.
LikeLike
Grifters gotta grift!
LikeLike
Breakfast with Dinesh D’Souza, what a great way to start the day.
LikeLike