Frank Breslin is a retired teacher in New Jersey. This article originally appeared in the NJEA monthly publication.
What if your race had known only tragedy
throughout America’s history? What if your people had been enslaved, murdered, persecuted and denied their civil rights?
And what if, instead of owning up to having inflicted such outrages, showing remorse, asking forgiveness, and making amends, those responsible, their descendants and
sympathizers denied that those actions had ever
occurred or, if they had, they had best be forgotten?
But what if the history of those deeds could
never be taught in our schools, but covered in
silence because it would only be “divisive” or
“racist” against those whites who had committed
them? Rather, let bygones be bygones! We should
forget the past and simply move on!
This is the white supremacist gospel being
preached by some in our country today, especially
by protestors at school board meetings. It is the
New Jim Crowism that would leave no public
record in the classroom of the centuries-old infamy that was inflicted on the Black race.
Moreover, these protestors add insult to injury
by denying the victims of this racism the chance to finally have their story told to America’s children as our schools have done for the Holocaust. Children deserve the truth, not fairy tales, even when the truth makes racists uncomfortable.
Anyone with an ounce of humanity could not
help but be moved when learning about the brutal treatment of Blacks over the centuries. Students would learn that the justification of slavery was preached even from church pulpits. They would learn about the KKK, Jim Crow laws, lynchings, fire bombings of Black churches, racial segregation of our schools today—decorously disguised as “school choice,” the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., the killing of George Floyd, and the freedom march in Birmingham, Alabama when Commissioner “Bull” Conner turned his fire hoses, attack dogs, and police truncheons on peaceful Black marchers demanding their civil rights, as Americans watched aghast at their TV
screens as it unfolded.
It would be a national catharsis to know that
America was finally coming to terms with the dark
chapters in its history and not-so-distant past. For
this is what great nations do that are big enough,
humble enough, contrite and courageous enough
to admit their failings and vow to do better. The
beginning of healing is the admission of wrong!
Great nations also reverence the sacrosanct
nature of the mind. They do not insult those who
have dedicated their lives to the noble profession of
teaching the young. They do not force teachers to
indoctrinate their students with a sanitized history
that omits the entire truth about their nation’s past.
However, teaching the truth is terrifying to these
protestors who view truth as dangerous, especially
for their children, for it would mean losing control
over their minds. Schools that teach what actually
happened should be shut down because truth
leads to social unrest, and it is better to have peace
based on lies.
In a word, we are dealing with an
educational philosophy that teaches: Thou shalt
not think! Thou shalt not question! Thou shalt
only conform!
These protestors abhor teaching about what
happened to Black people since this would mean
the end of their white supremacist world. Their
protests are an assault on the mind itself, the
importance of truth, and the nature of education.
An education in its ultimate sense is not an
initiation rite into the myths of one’s tribe, but
a personal struggle to free oneself from those
myths. It is escaping from Groupthink. An
education is not about fear of the truth or a blind
acceptance of White supremacist doctrine.
Teachers resist such indoctrination of their
students. They want to teach, not suppress, the
truth of what happened, but these protesters know
what happened and want to suppress it lest it be
taught not only to their children, but to everyone’s
children, as well, a.k.a. censorship.
Teachers refuse to aid and abet this fantasy
of a dying white Supremacy whose days are
numbered as anyone knows who has checked
the demographics, for what we are hearing today
is but its death knell!
A classroom is a sacred place, a temple of
reason, not a recruiting station for a white
supremacist doctrine that would ban the teaching
of Black history because it dismisses Black people
themselves as unimportant in their kind of
supremacist democracy that is not a democracy
at all, but an ethnocentric, xenophobic, wouldbe fascist dictatorship, and not the American
democracy most of us know, cherish, and want
to preserve.
Teachers refuse to violate their consciences by
lying to children and shattering their trust in them,
and when they are forbidden to tell the whole
truth lest it embarrass white racists, they refuse
to betray both children and truth
Frank Breslin is an NJREA member and a retired
English, Latin, German, and social studies
teacher. An educator for over 40 years, he retired
from the Delaware Valley Regional High School.
Thank you for posting Breslin’s piece.
SO TRUE, SO TRUE.The Classroom is indeed a sacred place where truth SHOULD prevail.
Teachers MATTER.
Students deserve the truth and so do adults. One truth Democrats do not want to broach is that charter schools are modern day Jim Crow under the guise of “choice.” Anyone that that followed “choice” understands that Black and Brown communities are targeted in order to place these students in separate and unequal schools. We as a country should not be supporting such racially biased practice. Separate is never equal!
DeSantis is trying to mold Florida into his own biased version of the society. He had the nerve to tangle with Disney, the largest single employer in the state. “A 2019 study found Disney dominates the Central Florida tourism industry, according to Oxford Economics, and produced: $75.2 billion annual economic impact for Central Florida. 463,000 jobs. $5.8 billion in additional state tax revenue.” Disney dared to criticize the recent “Don’t Say Gay” law. Disney hires lots of creative people, and some of them are gay. Kudos to Disney for standing up to our bully governor and supporting human rights. The public needs to understand that DeSantis is a would-be dictator that must never become president.
Kudos to Disney? Really?! Di$ney Crui$e Line sails to and docks in the Dominican Republic…..a country that bans same-sex marriage and condones discrimination against LGB people. Di$ney is a $$$$$ making machine and didn’t care one bit about DeSantis’s bill until the activists decided to make a deal of it. Do you think Di$ney will suspend it’s sailing contract to the Dominican Republic?
DeSantis knows that Disney needs Florida much more than DeSantis needs Disney. Disney is not going anywhere and risks getting people to decide not to do business with Disney is Disney keeps going on the political path that it has taken.
Disney is leaking internal memos and training and most Americans would find objectionable and blatantly anti-religious. Disney has to be very careful not to destroy its corporate image.
Disney is a typical corporation that always puts self interests first, and it is known for being conservative leaning which is why this disagreement is interesting. My hope is that DeSantis’ whole regressive, anti-democratic campaign blows up in his face.
“Disney is leaking internal memos and training and most Americans would find objectionable and blatantly anti-religious.”
I’m guessing by “anti-religious” you mean the bare minimum civility to gay and trans folks? Like referring to people as their preferred gender and not telling them they’re going to hell?
“. . . and blatantly anti-religious.”
Good! This country needs a hell of a lot more blatantly anti-religious thinking.
Duane E Swacker
Amen !
An Ontological Proof of the Nonexistence of God, by Jean-Paul Shepherd
If there were a God, he, she, or it would have long since smitten Duane.
There are so many gods, Duane, that it’s darned surprising that one of them hasn’t gotten you yet!
Atheists, agnostics, theists–all get lots and lots of press, but no one ever talks about us hypertheists, who believe in all the gods–Thor, Bastet, the Papuan Pig Goddess. You may think that that’s easy, but there are so many gods and so little time.
P.S. The other name for that argument, above, is The Argument from Duane.
I’ve made it a practice lately to believe in six different gods every morning before breakfast.
If you have a god that you would like for me to believe in for a few minutes tomorrow morning, just let me know!
Does anyone know what it means when a right winger who votes for politicians who lie and cheat on their wives and support policies that hurt children think something is “blatantly anti-religious”?
I have a feeling that most people who are religious (as opposed to professing to follow a religion whose precepts they ignore whenever it serves their goals) would be characterized as “blatantly anti-religious” by the far right.
Breslin speaks the truth. For a whole chunk of US history, the US was a terrorist, authoritarian dictatorship for African Americans and the indigenous peoples. For them, it was not the land of the free, it was rather the land of the oppressed and terrorized. The latter may sound like an extreme statement but not in the early history of the US and up to the mid-twentieth century. Canada also had a sordid history in the maltreatment of its first peoples.
We can add Australia to the list of countries with a sordid past with regard to its indigenous people. Colonialism in general exploits native people.
“We can add Argentina to the list of countries with a sordid past with regard to its indigenous people.” It is populated almost entirely by Europeans. A Governor decided about a century ago that the indigenous people were unwanted, and he ordered a genocide.
Diane, Argentina at least has a govt that is far more liberal than ours in every way, and is quite open about its mistreatment of indigenous cultures. That may not translate into better cultural attitude toward indigenous cultures nor correct the imbalance of rich-poor inequality at this moment, but it’s a start toward a better future– we in US seem determined to dial back on whatever initiatives we’ve taken on such issues in the past.
True. But for a tourist, it was striking to see a South American nation with no indigenous people.
Yup. They are a lot like us. Slightly larger % of indigenous Argentinians than Native Americans, but not by much. If BA is your base, you’d have to trek hundreds of miles to visit them (thousands to visit Mapuches!). I’d pick the Guaraní so I could see Iguazu Falls too.
I saw Iguazu Falls. Unforgettable!
One truth that almost all “educators” and teachers refuse to see/understand is that implementing the standards and testing malpractice regime is harmful to all students and should immediately stop implementing.
But, but, but. . . it’s the law.
None of those “educators” and teachers seem to understand it is their moral and ethical imperative to not implement very harmful malpractices.
Many, I think, give lip service to that nonsense and then do their best to teach DESPITE it.
Yes, that may be but they haven’t done anything against it which is what needs to be done.
But the silent refusal is something. What really irks me is that the teachers’ unions haven’t taken the standardized testing mandate to the streets. THEY could stop this child abuse, and that they haven’t done this is complicity in child abuse.
De acuerdo.
“I love the uneducated.” –Donald J. Trump
Why do Republicans ban books? Because reading books will cause people to learn things, and learning things will cause them to become Democrats.
damn those ‘libruls’ always reading books… 🙂
One of the conservative groups just put out a breathless report in Arizona that the evil Socialists were rebranding CRT as this “new thing” called SEL. LOL.
If you really believe that caricature, you need to leave your ideological bubble and expose yourself to the wider world. There are conservative writers and scholars who are more learned than any of the commenters on this blog and who can easily hold their own with anyone in intellectual discussions. As with all parts of the political spectrum, there are plenty of uninformed dolts on the Right, but that doesn’t discredit everyone who dissents from left-wing orthodoxy.
If you believe that people on the left of the political spectrum in the United States do not read books and articles and essays and white papers by conservatives, including conservative intellectuals, you are sorely mistaken.
The last argument I posted on this blog from any writer was from George Tenet’s At the Center of the Storm.
“I love the uneducated.” De facto leader of the Republican Party, Donald J. Trump, the guy who thought that Frederick Douglass was still alive, that Alabama was on the East Coast, that injecting disinfectant was a great idea, that we could send astronauts to the sun, that Demark would be interested in selling Greenland to us, that stealth airplanes were actually invisible, who had no idea what the nuclear triad is, who kept saying that China pays the tariffs we place on Chinese goods, who thinks that undocumented immigrants are a major source of crime and that Venezuelans colluded with the Democratic Party to rig voting machines, that he won the last election, that Putin’s latest invasion of Ukraine was “genius,” etc., etc.
Donald Trump is definitely a willfully uninformed dolt, as are Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. In a country of 330 million people, why do we have such low caliber leaders?
Many left-wing people often claim that their beliefs make them morally and intellectually superior to their political opponents, and they virtue-signal accordingly (e.g. “In this house we believe…” signs). I take the liberal side on some issues, and I’ve been a lifelong avid reader of serious books. But I long ago abandoned the self-comforting idea that being a voluminous reader automatically makes one superior to other people. Lenin and Stalin were very well read, as were many high ranking Nazis in the Third Reich; I could cite many other examples. One of the most pointed sentences in “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” – based on true stories – notes how a simple, semi-literate white man helped slaves cross the Ohio River to freedom while many prominent intellectuals of that era justified slavery. Alas, life is much more complicated than Good Guy Lefties and Bad Guy Righties.
Donald Trump is not in the same league with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. They are not dolts. They are intelligent people who don’t embarrass the nation on a daily basis.
Trump is in a league of his own. On every day of his four-year term in office, he said ridiculous things, he boasted of his own genius, he insulted our allies, and he cozied up to our nation’s enemies. Every day, the citizens had to wonder and worry what he would tweet next. “Dolt” was probably the kindest description of this egomaniacal narcissist.
Very well said, Ms. Fischer!
Yes. Biden is in an entirely different league from Donald Trump. For one thing, he’s an adult. And he is compassionate. And he is experienced and knowledgeable. I was skeptical about him, but no more. He is doing a breathtakingly good job.
BTW, I get sick of hearing people make fun of his occasional gaffes. Biden struggled mightily with stuttering as a child and overcame this, a significant achievement. Public speaking doesn’t come naturally to him. But time and again, he says the insightful, profound thing extraordinarily well. In my book, he’s FDR.
Correct about Lenin and Stalin. And the example of this that comes to mind to me is Joseph Goebbels. A PhD with a specialty in Romantic literature. A playwright. A gifted philologist. And, with Stalin and Pol Pot, one of the most evil people who ever lived.
I had my doubts about Joe Biden. No more.
Oh, btw, Slava Ukraini!
You raise a really important issue, Ms. Fischer. We do a better job of vetting the qualifications of the person who’s going to run the local gas station than we do vetting the one who is going to be president and commander in chief. It’s obscene. A parade of idiots (Biden is an exception to this). I always get furious that when there are presidential debates, the questioners almost never ask questions designed to get at the candidates’ knowledge and ability to reason carefully. How does someone as ignorant and morally bankrupt as Donald Trump is become president? Why is the profundity of this ignorance and amorality not exposed? I always want to jump through my TV or computer screen and scream at the questioners: Ask him to explain what the Posse Comitatus Act is and why it is important and what limitations it places on presidential power. Ask her what the Warsaw Pact was. Or the Katyn Massacre. Or the Berlin Airlift. Ask him how U.S. healthcare costs compare to those of the other members of the OECD. Ask him what the OECD is. Ask her what specific types of weapons are banned by the Rome Statute. Ask her to explain what a filibuster is and why it is used. And so on. This kind of thing would eliminate the Donald Trumps and Marjorie Greenes from consideration for office.
Ask her what net present value or the labor theory of value is. Ask her to explain credit default swaps. Ask him to explain and give examples of technological revolutions in military affairs (RMAs) or what Clausewitz’s major arguments were in On War and how these have had to be modified in light of modern developments. Ask him what the issues are in Cyprus and Myanmar. Ask her what the Gideon v. Wainwright decision was and why it’s important.
I am not kidding about this. This is a serious public office. It requires extraordinary expertise. Would the average person be able to answer these questions? No. The average American has a hard time finding Texas on a map. But if you’re going to have heart surgery, you want a cardiologist, not an “average American.” And you don’t want an Average Jack in the Oval Office. You want and Extraordinary Jack (or Jill). You want someone of the quality of, say, Fiona Hill or Julia Ioffe (lord, I wish these women were a natural born American citizens).
A presidential race in the United States almost always reminds me of the line of the Old Trouper cat to Mehitabel, the cat of ill repute, in Archy and Mehitabel: “Come, my dear. Both of our professions are being ruined by amateurs.”
Bob,
I don’t understand why you bother to reply to Kim Fischer. It legitimizes her as an honest person — the way you are – instead of far right ideologue who is here to push lies.
Remember, Kim Fischer started out by stating as fact that “Donald Trump is definitely a willfully uninformed dolt, as are Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. In a country of 330 million people, why do we have such low caliber leaders?”
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are willfully uninformed dolts like Trump?
People who post dreck like this should be asked to give an example who a politician who isn’t a willfully uninformed dolt before anyone engages with them as gives them legitimacy.
If Kim Fischer’s answer was to name Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, and Joe Manchin as the politicians that aren’t “willfully uninformed dolts”, you would know that trying to engage someone whose view is so right wing would be a waste of time.
These folks are not honest actors here, and they should be put on the spot to defend the lies they spew to try to get people to hate the Democrats more and stay home so Kim’s beloved right wing Republican party can take over this country. Engaging with her just legitimizes her lies instead of calling her out.
My next post – addressed as a reply to Kim Fischer – will give you an example of how this propaganda works.
Kim Fischer,
You need to leave your ideological bubble and expose yourself to the wider world.
Many right wing supporters like you, Kim Fischer, often claim that their beliefs make them morally and intellectually superior to their political opponents, and they virtue-signal accordingly (e.g. “In this house we believe…” signs). The virtue-signalling by right wingers includes saying things like “I take the liberal side on some issues” without saying what issues those are and making rabidly dishonest attacks about how Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are “uninformed dolts”.
Kim Fischer, I take the conservative side on some issues, and I’ve been a lifelong avid reader of serious books. But I long ago abandoned the self-comforting idea that being a voluminous reader automatically makes one superior to other people. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley went to Ivy League schools, and many high ranking Nazis in the Third Reich were well read.
If life is “too complicated” for you, Kim Fischer, to say that blatantly lying is bad, that speaks to your own morality.
If life is “too complicated” for you, Kim Fischer, to say that the Republican Party that encouraged a violent overthrow of the 2020 election to install the “rightful” president Trump is doing something wrong, then that speaks to your own morality.
There is nothing else to say, as your post speaks volumes about your warped view of “Bad Guy Lefties” and “Good Guys Righties who lie about elections to foment violence with their stop the steal lies”.
Kim Fischer, believing that Good Guy Righties should be above the law is your problem. They should not be. The fact you can’t just condemn those who are the mainstream Republican Party who condone lawbreaking in the name of gaining power speaks volumes about your own moral compass.
Kim Fischer, I challenge you to be honest and provide a list of politicians who you do not call “uninformed dolts”, so the folks here can really see who it is you admire. I’m guessing it will reveal your own definition of “informed’ by including many right wing politicians who have pushed false narratives. And exclude any politician who isn’t right wing. You probably find Joe Manchin admirable, don’t you?
I have read that Japan did something like this after WWII and most Japanese born after World War II have no idea that Japan started the war and committed horrible atrocities such as the Rape of Nanking.
My Chinese father in law is 90 and he was a teenager when the Japanese invaded China and occupied Shanghai were he lived. He witnessed (with his own eyes – I want to make that clear) a Japanese officer bedhead his teenage cousin who was coming to visit him after school because he’d stayed home due to an illness. The cousin had just reached the house but was still outside when the officer, in a beheading contest with another Japanese officer, lopped off the 12 year old’s head from behind, and moved on to find the next Chinese person to behead. The cousin didn’t even know it was going to happen. It happened that fast.
!!!!
Yes, the Japanese performed horrible experiments on Chinese civilians: quote – The truth is that Japan’s Unit 731 committed some of the most heinous war crimes ever. Thousands of prisoners were killed in cruel human experiments at Unit 731, which was based near the northeastern China city of Harbin, north of the Korean peninsula and on a border with Russia. Perhaps hundreds of thousands more — maybe as many as a half-million — were killed when the Japanese tested their biological weapons on Chinese civilians. end quote from https://history.howstuffworks.com/world-war-ii/unit-731.htm
The Japanese occupation of Korea was also brutal, cruel and ruthless. I will never forget a Korean woman being interviewed on TV about the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan. She said that the US should have dropped more atomic bombs on Japan. That interview was from many decades ago, sorry I forget the source.
Today, Japan is great, a decent non militaristic democracy.
I can remember that my father-in-law had some unpleasant things to say about the Japanese. He served in the Pacific during WW II, and he witnessed some terrible, barbarous behavior from the Japanese soldiers.
My stepfather, who was a paratrooper in WWII in the Pacific, carried this hatred for a long, long time.
Is Breslin overstating this? “these protestors add insult to injury by denying the victims of this racism the chance to finally have their story told to America’s children as our schools have done for the Holocaust.”
At least where I live, the story of slavery and Jim Crow has long (for decades) been taught in Soc Stud classes. The only concern I’ve had is that they need to augment with key events such as Black Wall St decimation, and massacres over voting rights such as Ocoee and Rosewood massacres. Many (most?) of the incidents cited by Breslin are part of the curriculum, no? History teachers, correct me if I’m mistaken.
I suspect (again, correct me if I’m wrong) that where our current Amer Hist curriculum soft-pedals it is on the treatment of Native Americans.