A few days before Russian troops invaded Ukraine, Putin justified the decision to make war by claiming that Ukraine did not exist. It was a fake nation, invented by Lenin.
But…
The Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler debunked Putin’s web of lies.
The reality is that Ukrainian culture and language have existed for centuries and a Ukrainian nationalist movement sprang up in the mid-1800s, angering the czars. While parts of what is now Ukraine was part of the Russian empire, the rest of the state was, at various times, under the control of Poland, Lithuania and Austria-Hungary.
Moreover, when Ukrainians were given a choice of remaining with Russia in a 1991 national referendum, 84 percent of eligible voters went to the polls — and more than 90 percent, including many non-Ukrainians, cast ballots for independence.
Putin made the absurd claim that Ukraine posed a threat to Russia because it was developing nuclear weapons.
The fact is that Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in 1994 in exchange for recognition of its sovereignty. Russia signed the agreement, called the Budapest Memorandum.
Kessler writes:
This is sheer fantasy. There is no evidence that Ukraine wants to develop nuclear weapons — or that it even has the capacity to do so, given the ruined state of the economy.
There was a cache of more than 1,000 strategic nuclear weapons on Ukraine’s soil when the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. That made Ukraine instantly the world’s third biggest nuclear power, with more weapons than Britain, France and China combined. But the country gave up the stockpile for what seemed like a good deal at the time. In the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, Russia, along with the United States and Britain, agreed to “refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine” in exchange for Ukraine’s joining the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Now that Russia has essentially ripped up the Budapest Memorandum, some Ukrainians have wondered whether it was a bad bargain. “Ukraine has received security guarantees for abandoning the world’s third nuclear capability,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a speech this month at the Munich Security Conference. “We don’t have that weapon. We also have no security.”
Another question: Is today’s Russia even a legitimate member of the United Nations, let alone a member of the key Security Council where Russia routinely vetoes essential UN action?
The former Soviet Union was a legitimate member, but the Soviet Union ended more than 30 years ago. Russia was only a component state of the Soviet Union, so it would require a vote of the UN to admit Russia as an individual member — no such vote was ever taken.
Re the Russian invasion of Ukraine: If, before the invasion, Biden had warned Putin that “The first thing we are going to do is to kick Russian banks out of SWIFT,” there never would have been an invasion.
And, even now if we kicked Russian banks out of SWIFT, Russia would quickly withdraw from Ukraine in order to be re-admitted, so vital is SWIFT to Russia’s economy.
BUT, not only have we not yet kicked Russian banks out of SWIFT, we are barely even considering it because U.S. and NATO-nation banks don’t want that because they make too much money from Russian bank deals.
Being kicked out of SWIFT would IMMEDIATELY slam Russia’s economy into the dirt because Russian banks would be cut off from international financial transactions, including Russia’s oil sales that make up 40% of the entire Russian economy.
SWIFT stands for: Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications. Without it, Russian banks are dead in the water and cut off from international business — and down goes Russia’s entire economy.
Why not just show the official internationally recognised documentation of Ukraine’s, not UN statement or EU but Ukraine’s, declaration of its borders as fixed, a requisite of any declaration of Sovereignty?
You can’t, can you?
Hello Diane: Here is an informative “From the Archives” essay from the New York Review of Books, October 1992 issue regarding the history of Ukraine and its relationship with Russia. “Not So Free at Last” by Abraham Brumberg
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1992/10/22/not-so-free-at-last/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NYR%2002-24-22%20Judah%20Wineapple%20Prose%20Nussbaum%20Seidel&utm_content=NYR%2002-24-22%20Judah%20Wineapple%20Prose%20Nussbaum%20Seidel+CID_5452bbefb3ff2c95638049bf7ddc78d5&utm_source=Newsletter&utm_term=Not%20So%20Free%20at%20Last
Well, Putin isn’t the first leader to lie about a country (the Ukraine) developing nuclear weapons to justify a bloody war.
U.S. President George W. Bush did the same thing to justify going to war in Iraq, and look what that caused. That invasion, based on the same lie, opened a Pandora’s Box in the Middle East that’s still a serious threat to world peace and every peaceful Muslim living in the Middle East or even the US because peaceful, innocent Muslims that are US citizens have often been targeted to be killed by dangerous fundamentalist’s Christian domestic terrorists.
Putin has also been caught in another falsehood against Ukrainian independence. How can he deny Ukraine the right to the sovereign status as an independent nation, while “recognizing”the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk which have never been independent nations in their history?
This is a dictator molding the world in his own warped image, picking and choosing who may be independent and who may not.
Throughout history, dictators become increasingly emboldened by perceived weaknesses in Western democracies. He would only back down if he realizes that the West will not. The cost to Putin must be clearly and unequivocally demonstrated to be higher than the gain. The West must show greater resolve economically through kicking Russia out of the SWIFT banking network and freezing all Russian national assets, politically by isolating Russia even further and threatening to remove its permanent status from the United Nations Security Council, and militarily by showing we are prepared to help all people in Europe and elsewhere that freedom is non-negotiable.
I wish it were possible to remove Russia’s status in the UN Security Council. The Russian veto makes the UN toothless against Russian aggression.
Diane: Russia in the U.N. “Security” Council. That’s what we get when we invite the fox into the chicken house and use false equivalences as a general principle for policy formation.
Here, we have (as others have said here) a really stupid psychopath who has painted himself into a corner. His choices are the back down or kill everyone. Raise your hand if you think Putin will back down.
It’s a twist on the old idea that “if you break it, you own it.” For Putin, it’s: “If I cannot own it, then I’ll break it” . . . aka, turn everything into a nuclear wasteland. CBK
Putin, unlike Trump, is not stupid. He is smart, calculating, evil, and cruel. And a psychopath.
My historical knowledge is not deep so feel free to correct me. Would it be fair to say that that entire area, i.e., greater ‘Eastern Europe,’ is susceptible to dictators/ autocrats/ czars/ emperors playing with their territories’ borders because those borders have been in play, at their political whim, for centuries? It seems to me what Putin says about Ukraine could be said about any number of countries (or ‘areas’) in that part of the world.
Also, a Q for both you and quickwrit above: Biden has indicated we (the US) wish to close Russia out of SWIFT but have not yet got full agreement on that from G7 countries. Is it true we would suffer equally to those balking? I’m not sure that matters, though: we cannot afford to have any of our allies suddenly thrown into economic disarray just now, so perhaps the idea of exiling Russia from SWIFT is not actually an option?
Another thought on the SWIFT thing: it could also be that US/ G7 is leery of the idea of tanking Russia’s economy overnight & thus creating a huge country in economic privation and turmoil, with even more dangerous potential consequences. Thus the promotion of combined sanctions that will [supposedly] more slowly bring them around. I assume the main thought there is putting the screws to Russian oligarchs who, once backs are to the wall, will eventually bail on Putin.
bethree5,
Those are really good questions.
All I can say is that I am so glad to have Biden and the competent and thoughtful people in office. These are folks who try to understand all the complexities of an issue and make the best solution possible where there is no good solution.
Frankly, I thought they handled Afghanistan in about as good a way as anyone could have imagined, and it is a sign of the bended knee of our so-called liberal media that the NYT allowed the Republicans to direct the entire tone of their coverage of the withdrawal.
Can you imagine Trump’s people or Bush/Cheney’s? They always looked to how some crisis or disaster could line their pockets.
The Biden White House might have some self-serving folks since those people are everywhere, but the people in charge are people trying to find the best solution when there are no perfect choices.
Ron Klain is a good person.
The Biden White House may not be the most skilled in PR or hyping themselves, but they are good at governing and decent and caring and thoughtful people.
Unlike the Obama White House, the most self-serving folks were sent out of the country to serve some Ambassadorship.
Diane . . . About Putin being a stupid psychopath . . . If not stupid in your view, I doubt we mean the same thing by “stupid” or “smart.” There is a redundancy in “stupid psychopath.” Also, he certainly has misread history and the changes that have occurred since Stalin’s time; and I wouldn’t refer to his latest writings as intelligent or even coherent missives. He also seems to be obsessed with the US.
Isn’t it wonderful though that even in Russia, the democratic spirit is rising up. It’s reminiscent of that student in Tiananmen Square, or the velvet revolution. CBK
As long as Putin has total control of the military, no uprising is possible.
Steve B: “This is a dictator molding the world in his own warped image, picking and choosing who may be independent and who may not.”
Putin also says he is doing what “the people” of those “separatist” sections of Ukraine want; and yet he cavalierly overrides what the rest of the people of Ukraine want.
Oh . . . I forgot, it’s not about what the people want. It’s what the people want whose wants happen to coincide with Putin’s. As you say, “This is a dictator molding . . . ” CBK
The Ukrainian people will show the war criminal what the people of Ukraine want.
I saw a clip on TV tonight, either BBC or CNN of Ukrainian women making Molotov cocktails. Putin can crush Ukraine but it will be a costly occupation.
A proud, brave people! Likewise, those in Russia in the streets protesting, where being arrested in a protest can ruin a person’s ability to earn a living forever.
Is Ukraine a sovereign nation?
The short and simple answer is, yes. It is a member nation of the United Nations, and so it is a sovereign nation under international law.
And violation of its territorial integrity by an aggressor state is a war crime.
Why don’t Biden, Western Europe and Israel freeze the assets of Putin ally, Roman Abramovich? In addition to Russian citizenship, Abramovich gained citizenship in Israel and Portugal (April. 2021) based on Jewish ancestry (Times of Israel). Anti-Semitism in Russia makes for a compelling argument for Jews around the world to rally behind Ukraine’s president and its people.
In the current context of Russian aggression against Ukraine, Abramovich shouldn’t benefit from investments made possible by Putin. And, it’s time to call in the benefits Abamovich accrued by claiming Jewish heritage .
Situations like this give the lie to pacifism, don’t they?
Is it possible that there was a secret deal between Trump and Putin over Ukraine and other European regions in 2016, as there was between Hitler and Stalin over Poland and Eastern Europe in 1939?
Russian meddling in the 2016 election, and again in 2020. What was Russia to gain by supporting Trump, and was the American presidency the ultimate prize…that Trump would be willing to give Putin anything he wanted?
It might help to lay the foundation for the relationship that Trump and Putin have.
It’s not the size of the dog in the fight. It’s the size of the fight in the dog. –General Keith Kellogg
Regarding the question, the answer is yes, absolutely. Ukraine was formerly a part of Soviet Union, and the Kremlin knows what it really means to them. The territory(which is current Ukraine) was seized by Nazi Germany in 1941. Putin was apparently not happy with the way Ukraine became independent 50 years after that.
Putin was so afraid of seeing their former territories turning away from his vision of empire one after another, so he tried everything he could to make his next-door neighbor subject to his regime–just like Beralus. Instead of seeking possible diplomatic options, he pushed his accumulated anger brewed in the last 8 years of strained relationship with Ukraine.
The guy just chose to take it by force. I wished this could have been avoided. Sadly, we are seeing what’s happening now in Kyiv. He did this to cater to his egomanic Stalinistic ideology for glorification of Russian empire. What a lunatic, mad man.
Even Putin’s unnatural creation Trump, at CPAC, had to back off his lavish praise of the “genius” of this invasion by the bloody, mad Tsar.
Putin announced he was putting his nuclear capability into a state of readiness. What brought that on? Nuclear weapons in the center of Europe? This is his response to Ukrainian resistance? Putin is evil.
It’s shocking to think we’ve created a world in which one individual psychopath gets to decide whether it survives or not. This is a bigger risk than global warming. This is what the best minds should be trying to undo.
The true test of world statesmanship is achieved when leaders win friendship and agreement at the conference table of the nations of the world.
The act of war by Putin against Ukraine demonstrates that he is a failed leader both at home, and on the world stage. The mask of war is an attempt to take what he could not win through humanity.
Putin stands in the shoes of the dictators of the past…as he hurls lies and deceptions and inaccuracies at Ukraine. He is incapable and unwilling to win the peace because he is blinded by selfish and destructive desires for war and power.
He is a relic of the twentieth century, a dying breed, holding onto totalitarian views and tactics, and has no place in the modern world.
Putin’s actions may have expedited his inevitable exit from the world stage, as one can hope that more grounded Russian minds will conspire to remove him, bringing Russia back to the family of nations, and the world back from the destructive ideology of a tyrant.
If Republicans were smarter than they in fact are, then there would be a lesson for them in what’s happening to Putin’s image right now. Like every other autocrat before him, Putin narrowed his circle to quivering toadies for so long that he came to believe his own bs. He had no idea how backward and distorted his worldview was.
If (when?) the now Fascist Republican Party seizes complete power in the U.S., it will be met with massive, escalating resistance and will have to respond with massive, escalating violence and repression. Like Putin, the Republican fascists have no notion whatsoever how backward they are, how far behind the country in general and its young people in particular.
I believe that the Budapest Memorandum also says something about UK and USA not economically coercing Ukraine. Does not the offer for Ukraine to join EU fall foul of this condition? In order to provide more balance to this article I feel that this condition of the Budapest Memorandum should also be highlighted.
How is that coercion when Ukraine is eager to join the EU?