At the beginning of December, Jan Resseger wrote about why President Biden’s Build Back Better agenda is so important. At the moment, it’s prospects are dim,due to theintransigenceofSenator Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Senator Manchin drives a Maserati and owns a yacht, but his state is very poor and needs the help that Build Back Better offers.
Jan Resseger describes the hoary English tradition—which we inherited—of expecting the poor to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. This is apparently what Senator Manchin believes in, as he fears that the poor will become “spoiled” by too much government help.
She writes:
Right now, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed the Build Back Better Bill which represents a radically different philosophy: President Biden’s commitment to helping children whose families live in poverty instead of punishing their parents. The U.S. Senate is negotiating its version, which many hope to see passed by the end of 2021.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities explains why a single reform in the Child Tax Credit—making it fully refundable for families with very low income—is for America’s children the most important element in Build Back Better: “Making the full Child Tax Credit available for families with low or no earnings in a year, often called making it ‘fully refundable,’ is expected to generate historic reductions in child poverty compared to what it would have been otherwise. Before the Rescue Plan made the full Child Tax credit fully available in 2021, 27 million children in families with low or no income in a year received less than the full credit or no credit at all.” In the American Rescue relief bill last spring, Congress made three significant changes in the Child Tax Credit: raising the maximum Child Tax Credit from $2,000 to $3,600 per child through age 5, and $3,000 for children age 6-17; allowing families to receive a Child Tax Credit for 17-year-olds; and making the Child Tax Credit fully refundable for the year 2021. The House version of the Build Back Better Bill extends the first two provisions only through 2022, but the House version permanently makes the Child Tax Credit fully refundable:
“In the absence of the full refundability provision, the first two of those changes would lift an estimated 543,000 children above the poverty line, reducing the child poverty rate by 5 percent… But the two changes plus full refundability stand to raise 4.1 million children above the poverty line and cut the child poverty rate by more than 40 percent. In other words, the full refundability feature makes the expansion nearly eight times as effective in reducing child poverty.” “Until last spring’s COVID relief bill, many children had been excluded because “their families’ incomes were too low. That included roughly half of all Black and Latino children and half of children who live in rural communities… This upside-down policy gave less help to the children who needed it most. The (COVID) Rescue Plan temporarily fixed this policy by making the tax credit fully refundable for 2021. Build Back Better, in one of its signature achievements, would make this policy advance permanent.” (emphasis in the original)
In a new report last Friday, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities warnsabout what we can expect if the U.S. Senate fails to pass the Build Back Better Bill by the end of December, 2021 and allows to expire the reforms instituted temporarily for this year alone in last spring’s American Rescue Plan: “If Build Back Better isn’t enacted, the Child Tax Credit would revert to providing the least help to the children who need it most — and some 27 million children would once again get a partial credit or none at all because their families’ incomes are too low.”
The First Focus for Children Campaign outlines other urgently needed reforms included in the House version of the Build Back Better Bill: “The Children’s Health Insurance Program, CHIP, which covers roughly 10 million children would be made permanent, sparing it from serial expiration every few years.” The bill would also require states to make children’s eligibility continuous over all 12 months for CHIP and Medicaid; would guarantee 12 months (instead of 60-days) of postpartum coverage for mothers on Medicaid; and would provide 4-weeks of paid leave for new parents and expand family leave. Build Back Better would significantly expand access to quality child care and phase in universal pre-K for 3- and 4-year-olds. For young adults aging out of foster care, the law would lower the age of eligibility for the Earned Income Tax Credit from 25 to 18. The bill would also address hunger among children by making meals available during the summer months when school is not in session.
None of these programs directly invests in public education, but together they will improve educational opportunity. Why? We know that a family’s economic circumstances affect children’s opportunity at school. Recently this blog covered a new report that 101,000 students in the New York City Public Schools—10 percent of the district’s students—were homeless in the past year. Decades of research show that such challenges directly affect such students’ experiences at school.

The federal poverty rate is $26,500 for a family of four. Does anyone here really think that simply by bringing a family up to $27,000 or $28,000 that that family is truly “out of poverty”? Could any of you live on that, even without children? Stop saying Biden’s claimed plan (that he’s not even fighting for) will lift anyone out of poverty.
If you really want people lifted out of poverty, provide healthcare, raise the minimum wage and cancel student loan and medical debt, all things that Biden campaigned on and now has rejected.
Wake up, folks, you’re being played. Or maybe none of you really care since you’re all comfortably affluent so none of this affects you anyway.
LikeLike
I agree dienne77, but this is what we have to work with in a really bad political climate. I’m tired of the “bait and switch” every election cycle and I’m tired of people voting against their own best interests because they can’t/don’t understand that they are just being used (or deceived) as pawns for votes. The apple is rotten at the core….and that needs to change. Politics is now a business catering to business instead of creating policy for people.
LikeLike
“Now”? It always has been.
LikeLike
I guess I’m old at 58, but I remember growing up in gentler times when people mattered. I noticed change at the end of the Reagan Era and an increasing change when Clinton gave rise to Neo liberal politics/policy . That’s just how I see/perceive it. Bush 1 was the last “thoughtful” President….even if he was a Republican.
LikeLike
We are not “being played” and Biden has not abandoned the plan. This is the political, spiritual and moral reality in our country (and world). Are you not aware of the way our vaunted system works? Of current events…our history?
LikeLike
Dienne, I don’t understand what you are proposing, unless you are proposing nothing more than hatred for Biden.
The reason he can’t get his agenda passed is that he has a 50-50 Senate. Any one Democrat can block him. In this case, it is Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a very wealthy man who benefits from the coal industry and opposes climate change legislation. If you really wanted to see a change, you would suggest ways that Democrats could pick up one more seat and protect those they already have. But you get some kind of perverse thrill from bashing Biden. Senator Sanders, you must know, was a primary author of the BBB plan, as chair of the Senate Budget Committee. He wants to see the bill passed. Why don’t you?
LikeLike
The resident self appointed scold (D-77) makes a lot of broad assumptions about the people who post comments here. Many of the brilliant folks who comment here have written books, are academic scholars, polymaths, and have wide and rich experiences from A to Z. I would not presume to pigeon hole them nor to demean their intelligence or assessments of education policy or national/local politics. How do you get anything done when you have one political party that spends the whole day screaming commie, commie, commie, socialist, socialist, socialist. You know, the party that produced Trump. And no, I am not excusing the Democrats for their gutlessness and pro charter school baloney. At least there is a glimmer of hope with the Democrats while the GOP is a black hole of regression and nihilism.
LikeLike
For all our criticisms of Biden and the Democrats, we should acknowledge some positive outcomes of this administration. Biden has been quietly appointing judges to the US appeals court, and his selections are 76% female including many minority appointees. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-biden-black-women-federal-courts_n_60f700b9e4b09f2b2387a489
LikeLike
Thank you, retired teacher.
Go Biden.
LikeLike
It will take a full four years or longer for Biden to catch up to the number of federal judges appointed by Trump and rushed to confirmation by Mitch McConnell. Mitch understood that the most important thing he could do to cement a rightwing legacy was to capture the courts. That has worked well in the Supreme Court, where Trump got three right-wingers, added to three already in place.
LikeLike
The most far reaching impact of inmanchinsence by far will be on the climate.
BBB was not sufficient to achieve the CO2 mitigation goals scientists say are necessary to keep the temperature increase under 2C, but it was a significant start.
And now even that is being torpedoed by a single individual, who clearly is doing what he is out of pure, unadulterated self interest (greed), since his family and he have millions of dollars to gain (and potentially lose) from a phaseout of coal.
How absurd is that?
LikeLike
I should have said gain from a continuation of coal — and lose from a phaseout.
LikeLike
Okay I agree with all. BBB is just the tip of what the Nation needs. Even if the reality is it may be difficult to pass. But can we all stop using this phrase : .
“This is apparently what Senator Manchin believes in, as he fears that the poor will become “spoiled” by too much government help”
Is that what senator Manchin believes ? And we know this how? Perhaps we judge people by their actions, the consequences of those actions , who those actions benefit and not what we think they believe or what they tell you they believe. Until we an read minds. .
(Yes I plagiarized that from an economist who does not believe in patent protection. So its okay to not cite it. )
LikeLike
I can read Manchin’s mind:
All I read is “more”. Nothing about the “poor.”
More millions. More mansions. More expensive cars. More expensive yacht. More more more…”
LikeLike
Senator Manchin fears the poor will become “spoiled” by too much government help.
Maybe someone should force Manchin to learn what does that government help look like for the average poor person.
After welfare was formed during the Clinton Administration, most people on Welfare had to have a job earning poverty wages to quality for programs like SNAP. Even then, there was a time limit on how long someone could collect.
“It is not unreasonable to say that some families would be better off today if welfare reform had not passed. But the evidence is conclusive that far more families were lifted out of poverty than were made poorer because of it. 17 The 1996 welfare reform, in short, was no disaster.”
But, “The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) of 1996 fundamentally changed the nation’s social welfare system, replacing a federal entitlement program for low-income families, called Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), with state-administered block grants, the Temporary ..”
Those block grants turned out to be a nightmare.
What is one of the biggest problems with federal block grants? There is a need for greater accountability in how the funds are actually spent by the states. Why? Block grants and categorical grants are funding given to state and local governments by the federal government. The key difference is that block grants can be used for any purpose decided upon by the state or city whereas categorical grants must be used for a specific, designated purpose.
“SNAP, which provides money for food monthly to low-income individuals and families, is a program of the U.S. Agriculture Department and administered by state and local agencies. The average SNAP benefit per household in 2021 was $210.07 a month, according to USDA Food and Nutrition Service.”
“Economic security programs such as Social Security, food assistance, tax credits, and housing assistance can help provide opportunity by ameliorating short-term poverty and hardship and, by doing so, improving children’s long-term outcomes.”
LikeLike
Photos of Manchin’s house, car, and yacht should be plastered on billboards throughout WVA and even in other states. He is a despicable human being. Where is the outcry in WVA? I can’t believe that the Dems can’t find at least 1 Republican to vote for the bill. I wonder how hard they are trying.
LikeLike
Yep….where are Romney, Murkowski and Collins?
LikeLike
Summer soldiers.
LikeLike
I recognize we are focusing on BBB in this discussion, but I hope readers turned to the full article with its intro from Oliver Twist, noting the ‘pull yourself up by your own bootstraps’ attitude barely changed in US since founding days. It’s at the heart of why the tiniest moves toward better income distribution are shouted down with ‘socialism!’ ‘communism!’– even in an era when our income disparity outstrips any previous time in our history.
The attitude is inbred in our culture; it came with the Mayflower and hasn’t evolved quickly. Britain is far more socially progressive by now. We have always been hampered in that regard by our youth as a nation, and our comparative geographic isolation. While Dickens was needling the consciences of his countrymen with the serialized Oliver Twist, we had only recently grabbed “The Republic of Texas” from Mexico, admitted MI as a state, and were driving the Cherokees et al from the SE to the West. Not yet even a nation whose population has settled, and can be eyeballed as a whole to assess its needs. And a culture required to advance at no more than a slug’s pace due to its relative self-sufficiency [raw-materials-wise] combined with geographical distance from other cultures.
That our 25-yo breakthrough child tax credit excluded (and still excludes today, except temporarily as a covid aid measure) those who pay few/ no taxes– our poorest families– says it all.
LikeLike
It’s actually very ironic that America is supposed to be the land of the free where the individua
LikeLike
Individual is king and thinks for him or herself.
But the reality is that nearly everyone does and even thinks what they are told.
LikeLike
Resseger’s articles are always packed with insight and great resources. Under the description of Berliner’s post, this stopped me cold: “America’s educational problems are predominantly in the numbers of kids and their families who are homeless…” Read on and it just gets worse, enhancing the wallop, but that sentence alone did it for me. This is the country we live in. I was glad to learn of the 2013 Stanford [Reardon] study that gives all the detail backing this up.
LikeLike
How can BBB die when it was still-born to begin with?
LikeLike