Matt Barnum of Chalkbeat reported that the Gates Foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative are joining forces to fund a “breakthrough” in American education, despite the consistent failures they have experienced.
Are they slow learners or persistent?
Barnum writes:
The Advanced Education Research & Development Fund, announced Wednesday, is already funded to the eye-popping tune of $200 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, and the Walton Family Foundation. (Gates and Walton are also supporters of Chalkbeat.)
AERDF (pronounced AIR-dif) says its focus will be on what it calls “inclusive R&D,” or bringing together people with different expertise, including educators, to design and test practical ideas like improving assessments and making math classes more effective. Still, the ideas will have “moonshot ambitions,” said the group’s CEO Stacey Childress.
“One of our mottos for our program teams and the projects they fund is ‘heads in clouds and boots on the ground,’” she said.
It’s an unusually well-funded start for a new education organization, especially as big education funders have seen their influence wane in recent years after some of their ideas showed uneven results and prompted backlash. AERDF suggests these funders still have significant ambitions for improving education in the U.S., even if those efforts are less splashy — or controversial — than they once were.
The organization emerged from work that began in 2018, when CZI and Gates teamed up to invest in R&D. That resulted in a project known as EF+Math, which funds efforts to embed lessons in executive functioning — a set of cognitive skills related to self control and memory — into math classes.
“These executive functioning skills allow you to focus on what’s important, ignore distractions, let you think flexibly to solve problems and keep track of ideas,” said Melina Uncapher, the program’s director. “Perhaps not surprisingly, they’re strongly related to math skills.”
That effort, now part of AERDF, will start work in three school districts — Newark, New Jersey; Vista Unified in California; and Middletown, Ohio — this fall, said spokesperson Ed Wyatt.
You could write a book about their any failures. In fact, I already have written two. One is called Reign of Error and the other is Slaying Goliath.
What the billionaires refuse to recognize is that the root cause of poor academic performance is poverty. One experiment they might try is to raise the standard of living for targeted communities. Or they could fund hundreds of community schools with wraparound services for children and families.
Instead they prefer to search for the magic bullet that will overcome the obstacles in the lives of children who live in poverty. It appears that they learned nothing from their previous adventure into “education reform.”
A suggestion for the funders: Read Richard Rothstein’s Class and Schools.

Diane, The link for comments is broken.
Based on the 14th’s wording, the folks who participated in or encouraged the Jan 6 “rebellion” should be denied the right to vote. Thanks, Arthur
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 12:10 PM Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: ” James Grossman, executive director of the American > Historical Association, tweeted that today is the anniversary of the > certification of the ratification of the 14th Amendment to the > Constitution, which guarantees equal rights to all citizens. The Amendm” >
LikeLike
Raising the standard of living would be research with promise. They are not doing research, however, they are doing R&D. Research and development is a purely business pursuit. They are trying to create a product they can sell. The product, not education reform, is their goal.
LikeLiked by 1 person
R&D on children is repulsive (especially poor children). SEL in the 2017/18 school year was the last straw for our family…..child #2 went into private HS the next year. I just deleted the photos of the Growth Mindset assignments that my child sent to me asking what they had to do with Algebra I. I still have the emails that I sent to the teacher and administration asking questions. Funny thing though, I showed the photos to another child taking the same class at “the rich school” and they were never given Growth Mindset assignments? It was all an attempt to raise the test scores in our area and as far as I can tell, the scores have actually fallen since we left our zoned school. After the email exchange and proof with photos, my child was exempted from those assignments for the remainder of the year.
LikeLike
It’s enough to make you lose your mind. Do I teach mindfulness? No way. Growth Mindset? No. Social Emotional Learning? Not a chance. Meditation? Stop it. Yoga? Come on, now. Am I data driven? Heck no. Data informed? Informed, yea; data, nay.
People ask me all the time if I’m on the latest bandwagon. Do I teach this? No. That? No. The other thing? No. Then, what do I teach?
English.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great point!
LikeLiked by 1 person
an essential realization: educational research ONLY with the intent to sell product
LikeLike
Essential. Fundamental. Elementary, my dear Watson.
LikeLike
Executive functioning is not a thing, by the way. Nope. That is some made up cognitive pseudoscientific psychobabble, wherein “scientists” without neurology degrees try to liken the human brain to a computer chip. Doesn’t work that way, not that simple. Someone sold three billionaires a bridge. Suckers.
LikeLike
I meant cognitive scientists.
LikeLike
Also meant neurology medical degrees. Still getting the coffee to the brain out here in the Left Coast time zone.
LikeLike
I think executive functioning is a thing, but not something that is “taught”. It is something that develops late – and sometimes not at all – in some students.
The notion that it can be “taught” with math will surely be “confirmed” by billionaire-funded studies in which they point to the outstanding executive function of students who use their new math program, and their paid shills who call themselves researchers will do studies in which they intentionally and deliberately “accidentally” overlook how many students who actually struggle with executive functioning issues are summarily dismissed from the program and aren’t included.
On the rare occasion a reporter asks why so many students are missing who started doing their “math/executive functioning” program, the reporter will be told that it is because that student was violent and dangerous, or their parents decided they wanted their kid to have no executive function because those parents hate their kids and wanted them to fail. Gullible or ignorant or unethical education reporters will dutifully report that this new “math can teach executive function” was 100% successful. School systems will spend billions of taxpayer dollars to buy it. Job well done, from the perspective of greedy billionaires and the journalists who push the narrative that they know will make those billionaires like them. And maybe hire them.
I will bet any billionaire $1,000,000 that their new program will be 100% successful with all students who already have great executive function skills. In fact, if they pay me just $100,000, I can give them a program that develops great executive function skills in students who already have great executive function skills. I guarantee it will work on them, or their money back.
LikeLike
In what part of the brain is executive functioning executed? The cortex, right? In the theory of executive functioning, the cortex is able to regulate the midbrain. It’s possible for that to happen, but for lasting and meaningful effect, one has to be almost the Buddha himself to accomplish it. It takes a lifetime of meditation learn to to diminish your emotional responses without medication to affect the chemistry of the midbrain. I think what they’re really doing with all these SEL (social emotional learning) exercises is to make people take deep breaths while using tech products, and keep using them. And it doesn’t hurt the company’s bottom line to have students rate their feelings to provide some psychometric data to monetize. R&D, not research.
You, and retired teacher below, are right, this has to do with making money for Wall Street, and it has to do with spending less and less money on the safety net. It has nothing to do with better learning.
LikeLike
The billionaire ‘axis of evil’ unite so they can buy even more politicians to impose their will on working class America. They invest in standardization and testing despite the fact that main problem in education is that poverty is real and difficult to overcome. They will not find answers in gimmicks, gadgets and testing. Joe Biden is having far more impact on poverty than these elitists. The child tax credit is a meaningful way to address poverty. If billionaires really wanted to help the education poor children, they would support universal healthcare and help pay for public libraries and schools.
This country has too many biased billionaires that weaponize their wealth against democracy. The other failure of the elitists is that fail to understand that most people in this country believe in the public schools that helped build this country. They want to invest in their neighborhood public schools, not destroy them.
LikeLike
cx: They fail to understand.
Are they slow learners or persistent? Best question of the day.
LikeLike
Persistent venture capitalists paying slow learners to do their R&D. The cognitive “science” behind this project made me unwilling to pursue a career in psychology. I don’t do nonsense. The neurology classes I took were all fascinating, but cognitive psych classes were all folderol. I still remember the first lesson. Professor S. brought two shoeboxes to the lectern. One was the input box. The other was the output box. See where she was going? Hokum poke ’em.
There’s Freudian psych, behavioral psych, and cognitive psych. Freud had some interesting insights, but they’re not very useful. Behaviorism works, has real effects, but is often cruel and dehumanizing. Cognitive psych doesn’t work. It has no impact on the patient or subject. This project will have no impact on the quality of education. It won’t even affect the test scores, except to take time away from tried and true methods.
LikeLike
I know what executive functioning is, but I also know that it is secondary to primary needs. Poor students need primary needs, ie, food, shelter, safety etc. met before we can deal with executive functioning. Not surprising, billionaires are trying to put the cart before the horse.
LikeLike
Please see my above response to nyspsp.
LikeLike
The billionaires want to create a generation of passive “Stepford” drones.
LikeLike
Yes.
LikeLike
The billionaire mafia want to reshape education in their image and their half-baked theories. These people are Frankenstein’s of self-importance, arrogance and hubris. They think they have the magic bullet for education and want everyone else to shut up and just sit in the corner. The media swoon over these billionaires as if they are geniuses and educational experts which they are not.
LikeLike
Jesus H Christ.
Have they not learned from their past failures 2 very important lessons:
1) You can’t stick education in a box and export a lesson that can be taught in any classroom and can be effective – this alone prevents the scaling they seek for their ambitions.
2) You can’t take the teacher out of the classroom. You can’t program teachers to speak magical words like a flesh and blood robot. You can’t replace them with a computer that can predictively provide all the right information to make a child learn. You cannot program a child like you would a computer where if you put in Knowledge A + B you get C product.
Anything that they find “works” they are going to rapidly discover that the quirkiness of “individuality” and the uniqueness that makes each of us humans, will prevent them from scaling their ambitions and worse will consume precious energy from the teachers they experiment on, and the students’ futures they’ll rob trying to learn these lessons.
Again.
LikeLike
They fail to understand…
You WON’T convince anyone of anything by starting
your “pitch” with “HEY DUMB ASS” listen up…
Arrogance, the flag of elitists. Sneering at anyone
outside their sandbox, who would recognize their
“mission statements” DON’T map onto reality.
If RESULTS (interests being served) were used to articulate the function, the time worn mission statements
of the awareness foundation would fall flat.
LikeLike
(Yawn.)
Yet another pat-on-the-back fund which makes THEM feel good—and yes, here us vs. them is appropriate. It also creates another layer away from students via the salaried positions.
Meanwhile…may every teacher, para, bus driver, parent & others who work directly with students have a great year.
#year38
LikeLike
Some of our current educational efforts seem pointless because our students don’t have faith in a promoised future. It looks like we are floundering because our students don’t know where they are going after the leave any of our instutions of learning. It’s not the education part…it’s jobs that are missing, it’s the goal attained (that is missing for SO MANY).
LikeLike
I wonder how many private yachts and jets the Waltons own. The DeVoses have 10 yachts and 4 jets. 10 yachts and only 7 continents, 6 if you discount Antarctica. They could probably get by paying some taxes to help people who lost everything because of covid, floods, or fires, with only 3 or 4 yachts. And speaking of the DeVos family, AERDF reminds me of Neurocore.
LikeLike