Vice News reported that a notorious rightwing, anti-union group was running an astroturf campaign to shame New York City private schools for teaching about diversity and racial bias. The organization was called “Prep School Accountability” and was able to gin up lots of stories, especially in Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, about the “indoctrination” of privileged young minds. The man behind the campaign is Rick Berman, who runs ”The Center on Union Facts,” which attacks unions. The story is an impressive example of investigative digging, which exposed a hoax.
Rick Berman, an infamous right-wing lobbyist whose organizations have been accused of several astroturfing campaigns—and who is known as “Dr. Evil”—revealed that his firm is behind an organization that claimed to be a grass-roots movement against New York City’s prep schools focus on “diversity education.”
Last week, the New York Post reported on a “group of parents” that was planning to show billboards showing messages such as “DIVERSITY NOT INDOCTRINATION” and “WOKE SCHOOL? SPEAK OUT.” The Post’s story is centered around and features Prep School Accountability, which describes itself on its official website as “a group of concerned parents.”
“In recent years, a new orthodoxy has emerged at our schools, dividing our communities based on immutable characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. As a result, the core tenets of high-quality education—uniting all children and families through a love and appreciation for learning and community spirit—have gone by the wayside,” the Prep School Accountability website reads…
On Thursday, a researcher who specializes in open source intelligence investigations, published a post detailing evidence that he claimed showed Berman and Company was behind Prep School Accountability.
The researcher, who goes by Z3dster, found a handful of non-public author pages on the Prep School Accountability website, which is built with WordPress. The author pages belonged to:
- Charlyce Bozzello, whom the researcher identified as the Communications Director for the Center for Union Facts, an organization that is also run by Rick Berman. A Twitter account with the same name describes herself as “Just a New Yorker who left NY and can’t remember why.”
- Someone with the last name Petriccione, who appears to be Christy Petriccione, a Communications Associate at Berman and Company, according to a profile found here.
If I were a parent at the school, I would be disgusted with some outsiders who are presenting false narratives (and of course being lavishly compensated for it) about their private schools for their own personal gain.
One of the worst is Bari Weiss, the most “snowflake” of any opinion columnist who sees dire threats to her “freedom to speak” (i.e., post false narratives) if anyone other than those who praise her are allowed to critique what she says. It makes her sad, which threatens her freedom of speech, so she believes she is justified in demanding silence from her critics. For right wingers, feeling sad because your false narratives are challenged is tantamount to losing the freedom to speak.
I read an excellent reply to Bari Weiss from Thomas Schramm, a high school senior at a fancy LA private school for elites, Harvard-Westlake.
Schramm is actually quite a conservative 17 year old and is actually a fan of Bari Weiss, but he has an ethical core that Bari Weiss lacks. So he explains that Bari Weiss’ false narratives about his high school simply aren’t true, offering facts that back him up.
As far as I can tell, he was completely ignored by Bari Weiss.
I wish I could post a link showing a 17 year old high school student who makes Bari Weiss look like an incompetent overprivileged hack.
It is possible to find it via google, in the Harvard Westlake Chronicle. Published March 17, 2021, written by Thomas Schramm. Here is an excerpt from the beginning:
Guest Editorial: A letter to journalist Bari Weiss
“The following letter was written by a student to journalist Bari Weiss in response to her article “The Miseducation of America’s Elites,” which was published March 9 in City Journal magazine. …..
Hi Ms. Weiss,
My name is Thomas Schramm, and I’m a high school senior at Harvard-Westlake. I’ve been a huge fan of yours over the past few years, especially in your dealings with Jewish issues. I have immense respect for you and for all the work you have done for the Jewish community, and I’ve seen you as an inspiration for my own Jewish activism during my time in high school.
I’m writing to you in regard to the article you just wrote about “Wokeism” at major private institutions within the U.S., and more specifically, the activism Harvard-Westlake has undertaken over the past year. The parents you spoke to have grossly misrepresented the school’s efforts to be more inclusive with their curriculum, and their incendiary assertions have little to no factual basis. I serve as a member of the Prefect Council at HW, our student government, and have been watching the school’s activism from the frontlines….
…I wanted to address a number of the assertions made in your article, as they were deeply concerning and, frankly, untrue. The assertion that the school is promoting the idea that capitalism is somehow evil is entirely misguided. The photo you cited was a submission in the yearbook, a resource the school administration generally has little to no involvement in, and in no way communicated the position of the school. I would hope you agree that a student submission in a yearbook hardly equates to Harvard-Westlake “teaching students that capitalism is evil.” In fact, the school has a program called HW Venture which is entirely focused on promoting capitalism and entrepreneurship. Students may share their disdain for capitalism but that in no way makes the HW community at large a hostile environment to the ideology. It seems as though the parents you spoke to made a hasty generalization that doesn’t reflect the perspectives of the student body or the school administration.
The parents you spoke to have also created a false dichotomy, suggesting they have to entirely agree with the ideas put forward by the school or they will be hailed as racists. I can assure you that students have been challenging the ideas brought forward by speakers and by the members of the school administration all year long, and not only have they avoided the title of “racist,” but they have also been praised for their willingness to take part in such difficult conversations. Parents are also encouraged to come forward and take part in dialogue regarding the school’s curriculum and activism, but it seems as though the parents you spoke to lacked the courage to do so.”
As this high schooler points out, adults are fomenting dissent and hatred and claiming they are doing it for the kids when they are doing it because their own careers thrive by doing this to destroy our country.
Interesting addition to the post.
Why does every lunatic on earth have to call himself “a group of concerned parents?” What neural disorder causes that? Is there a concerned parent gene mutation? Is it concerned parent envy? If I were to ever get abducted by aliens from outer space, I would not be surprised at all if the aliens were wearing tee shirts with “group of concerned parents” written across the front. I’d be surprised by the aliens. I would not be surprised by the shirts.
LOL, LeftCoast! Very funny!!!
This Berman is a piece of work.
🙂
LCT,
Exactly right. When the usual billionaires wanted to push a charter referendum in Mass., they called their group Families for Excellent Schools. In NY, concerned “parents” raised $6-8 million in a day or two to run ads for Eva Moskowitz.
Well now, isn’t this special?
It will be interesting to see if the prep schools’ parents and administrators are persuaded by the shady campaign or if they think for themselves.
The right wing Daily Mail appears to be one of the campaign’s promoters.
Are the names real or made-up- Bozello, Petriccione, Lorenzo (twitter name identified in the Vice article)?
In Los Angeles, there is a real group of — actual parents who are really — actually — concerned about efforts to defund and privatize public schools. They are called Reclaim Our Schools L.A. They fight for culturally relevant libraries with librarians, smaller class size, and other means toward justice and equality. They are NOT called American Parents of Concern. Reclaim Our Schools. It’s easy to spot a fake.
Here is a teacher’s voice:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/04/13/nyc-teacher-were-damaging-kids-with-critical-race-theory/amp/
Daily Kos and MSNBC are trying to make their audiences believe that there are no obnoxious Woke lessons going on —that the hullabaloo is entirely baseless. This is gaslighting. The obnoxious lessons are real.
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2021/6/24/2036844/-Right-wing-media-and-think-tanks-are-manufacturing-a-culture-war-in-real-time
No doubt Bergman and his ilk are exploiting this. But let’s not pretend there’s nothing to exploit.
The most interesting thing about this issue is watching the public discussion evolve. It’s one of the clearest examples yet of polarized debate. Right-wing news media kicks it off with the extreme “Look at this scourge called CRT which is infecting our schools nationwide.” Left-wing news media responds with the equal & opposite extreme, “You made that up, CRT is a grad-level theory that isn’t taught in any K12 school anywhere.” [Cue Benson’s astroturf group drumming up examples; MSNBC et al will no doubt respond with counter-examples…]
Breaking it down: the right comes on like gangbusters, McCarthy-style, looking to stomp “it” out wherever it shows its ugly head. Sadly but typically, the left allows the right to frame the argument; they choose to take them literally, respond in kind, & you’ve got a binary argument that goes round in circles. The right is basically saying, “Hey remember when you said my mom wears army boots? Look: YOUR mom is wearing army boots!” And the left responds, “Hah, those aren’t army boots, you wouldn’t know an army boot if it kicked you in the tush. You just think all boots are army boots—because YOUR mom wears them.” [Immediate descent into does not! Does so!]
Yesterday, from an unlikely quarter, a high military official strikes the right note [google Gen Milley’s brief statement to Congress (billed as ‘supporting CRT’)]. He jumps straight past the debatable CRT misnomer, gets to the core of what the right is actually saying, and challenges them.
Who the hell is Z3dster? Why can’t he or she ID themself?
The NY Post story was legitimate — a group of affluent parents who paid a PR firm $10K to put up billboards. The parents want to remain anonymous to avoid retaliation against them or their kids.
This is NOT a right-wing conspiracy.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/06/crt-backlash-is-not-astroturf/