Maurice Cunningham is professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts. He specializes in unmasking Dark Money groups.
He writes:
Radical Right Ramps Up War on School Boards, Superintendents, Principals, and Teachers
A new professedly “grassroots” group called Parents Defending Education has joined the right wing assault on public education. It combines white supremacy with a vicious plan to launch personal attacks on elected officials, administrators, and teachers. Just another day in corporate education reform.
This group says it is fighting to restore “healthy, non-political education for our kids.” What they mean is anything that critically examines America’s racial history or present. 1619 is out, Trump’s 1776 project to promote “patriotic education” is in. Ibram X. Kendi and anti-racism? Definitely out. Wally and the Beav, in.
Parents Defending Education is a campaign to direct and manage attacks on educators who candidly raise questions of race and the need for work and sacrifice to place America on the road to racial progress. When I first saw Parents DefendingEducation’s website my thoughts immediately turned to an extremist front named Campus Reform. It’s a slime factory funded by Charles Koch and other billionaires that gins up attacks on college professors—especially those who research and write about race. Professor Isaac Kamola of Trinity University has written an essential piece on intimidation campaigns in the Journal of Academic Freedom, Dear University Administrators: to Protect Your Faculty from Right-Wing Attacks, Follow the Money.
Most attacks are leveled against faculty of color, or those whose research and teaching focuses on issues of race. Most start with a handful of organizations explicitly created to monitor and intimidate college faculty (most prominently Campus Reform and the College Fix); from there they travel to sympathetic right-wing websites and news outlets (also created by activist donors committed to undermining public institutions like universities), before arriving at Fox News. Most attacks that gain traction involve college administrations sanctioning faculty and condemning their speech.
University administrators hear from legislators, alumni, local media, parents, etc. The professor attacked gets inundated with hateful email, phone calls, and social media attacks, including physical and death threats. Professors have had to cancel lectures; Trinity College closed down temporarily due to threats.
Campus Reform pays student “investigators” to inform on professors who raise what they see as controversial topics. (In one case I’ve worked on, a video tape was obviously edited. That failed to move administrators).
Parents Defending Education is asking parents to inform on their school boards, administrators and teachers. Here’s a sample from its Expose page:
“These are not easy topics: the indoctrination of children with divisive ideas, the hijacking of our schools, the politicization and corruption of our educational systems. That’s why it is critical to expose what is going on in our classrooms and school systems. There’s a reason people say sunshine is the best disinfectant.”
“At Parents Defending Education, we’re dedicated to investigating and exposing what’s happening inside our schools, and one of the best ways is to follow the money.”
Let me just pause here and issue the “Parents Defending Education Follow the Money Challenge”: who is funding you, Parents for Education?
From the Engage page:
“Why are our schools adopting destructive and radical “woke” curricula
…
“In order to begin reclaiming your school, you and other like-minded parents should also get organized. There many steps that you can take, from asking a question at school up through launching your own local parent organization. Below are some resources we’ve developed to help you get started — from using social media to expose what your school is doing to pitching stories to the media to asking tough, public questions of school officials. Everything you do helps to create accountability and oversight.”
Here’s a page for you to report an incident to Parents Defending Education. Why, the group might even include you in their litigation campaign!
Yes, you can not only trigger online intimidation and threats of physical harm on school board members, superintendents, principals, and teachers, but litigation too! Here’s a link to a civil rights complaint Parents for Defending Education filed against the superintendent of the Webster Groves School District of Webster Groves, Missouri. The key language from Parents Defending Education’s president Nicole Neily (Sourcewatch reports that “Nicole Neily has worked for many Koch-affiliated groups”):
“Attached to this complaint is supporting evidence in the form of a blog post written by the District’s Superintendent, John Simpson, on June 3, 2020. Simpson’s post asserts that that “inequitable systems and structures” exist “within our school district.” “
“Those inequitable systems and structures disadvantage “Black children,” according to Superintendent Simpson, and “[c]learly” require “much” more work to dismantle.”
And what was the occasion of Superintendent Simpson’s blog post that so enraged Ms. Niely? His heartfelt response to the police killing of George Floyd. I can’t make this up.
School board members, superintendents, principals, teachers, this is coming your way. I can’t predict the entire course of these attacks but I can tell you this: they’ll be well funded, with dark money.
[Full disclosure: as an educator in the UMass system, I am a union member. I write about dark money (and other things)].
I would guess there are a lot of parents who do not see themselves as “right-wing” but are disturbed by the increasing politicization of education and would completely support an organized effort to amplify what’s happening on school boards (like in San Francisco, for a recent examples) and classrooms, even if that organized effort were funded by “dark money.”
Diane did not say “right wing parents”
She said ” right wing “parents” group.”
As someone who has frequented this blog, surely you know the difference.
And if it looks, walks and quacks like a duck but is funded by a Koch, it’s most probably simply a duck hunter dressed in a duck outfit to get close enough for a good shot.
I should have said “even if …”
If people don’t want to be identified as right wing astroturf groups, maybe they should consider raising money the way legitimate grassroots parents organizations do: with bake sales.
So true. When an alleged “grassroots,” “family-led” group of “ordinary moms” begins their existence with a budget of more than $1 million, you can be certain there were no bake sales. Look, look, look to the Waltons or some other funder of astroturf groups.
The duck analogy was perfect.
When there is an elected school board, as in San Francisco but not in NYC, Boston, or Chicago, parents can vote them out of office. You don’t need Koch money to do that.
FLERP!,
You really think that parents need a dark money organization to organize in San Francisco? Look around you. How many NYC parent organizations fighting to keep the SHSAT are led by parents who won’t do it unless they are paid $150,000 or $200,000 a year to fight for the things that are important to them?
I am now concerned that you are suggesting that there might be organizations similar to what this post is about in NYC where the parents who are leading it are actually getting extremely generous salaries from right wing sources. Do you believe this is the case, or are you just saying that you wish it were the case?
Most parents would find it odd that a parent genuinely concerned about an issue would only be concerned if they were paid an extremely high salary from a right wing group to support it strongly.
I’m just saying that I think parents who are concerned about these issues probably don’t care a bit about whether the money’s dark or not.
Speak for yourselves. If you think the pro-SHSAT (or anti-SHSAT) parent groups would be delighted to have parent leaders who will only do it if paid $150,000/year by dark money right wing billionaires (which says a lot about who they really answer to), then you know very different parents than I do.
Parents want people who represent THEIR interests, not the interests of the right wing billionaires who pay them lots of money.
If it was ever found out that a right wing billionaire paid a PTA president $150,000/year just for “speaking out on the issues that the parents at the school were concerned about”, that PTA president would be investigated. Not many parents I know would think it was okay because that parent claimed he or she was representing their interests. In fact, what they would say is that another parent would represent their interests for free, and that money could go to activities that benefited the students, not to that parent’s private bank account.
The idea that it is okay for parents to be paid large salaries by right wing billionaires to claim that they represent many other parents who are invisible is nonsense that only a gullible parent would believe.
I love the argument that there are so-called “parent leaders” who will only represent the interests of (invisible) parents if someone gives them a huge salary. They are paid to please the people who give them their generous salary and if they don’t, they won’t receive it anymore. That’s why the parents they supposedly speak for have to remain invisible.
“Parents want people who represent THEIR interests”
Totally agree.
By the way, FLERP!, I would be just as outraged if the Teachers’ Union paid so-called “parents” huge salaries to only lobby for the things that the teachers union wanted while those parents tried to deceive other parents that they represented parents in public schools and the media treated them as the main voice of parents in NYC public schools.
And I assume you would be outraged, too.
However, I don’t see groups that support public schools who try to mislead the public that way. The Network for Public Education doesn’t claim that it is a group of public school parents who represent the voice of public school parents.
Honesty. The difference between those who support public schools and the people who deceive and lie to try to undermine public schools.
I don’t care if my PTA president supports keeping the SHSAT. I do care if I find out that the PTA president is being paid $150,000 year by a right wing billionaire group that wants to keep the SHSAT.
FLERP! says: “Parents want people who represent THEIR interests”
Totally agree.”
I hope you agree that people who are hired and paid overly generous salaries by billionaires who want to privatize public education are representing the interests of the people who pay their salary, and not parents. They aren’t being generously compensated to put parents first, they are generously compensated to do what the people who generously compensate them want.
The point of “dark money” is not to reveal whose interests those people represent.
The right wing in Florida is going after college professors. A proposed bill would allow students to record lectures and turn them over to the “thought control police” to ensure that a variety of opinions are being accepted.
“CS/CS/HB 233: Postsecondary Education
GENERAL BILL by Education and Employment Committee ; Post-Secondary Education and Lifelong Learning Subcommittee ; Roach ; (CO-INTRODUCERS) Andrade ; Byrd ; Gregory ; Sabatini
Postsecondary Education; Prohibits State Board of Education and BOG from shielding students, staff, and faculty from certain speech; requires State Board of Education to conduct annual assessment on intellectual freedom & viewpoint diversity; creates a cause of action for recording or publication of certain video or audio recordings; revises provisions related to protected expressive activity, university student governments, & codes of conduct.”CS/CS/HB 233: Postsecondary Education
GENERAL BILL by Education and Employment Committee ; Post-Secondary Education and Lifelong Learning Subcommittee ; Roach ; (CO-INTRODUCERS) Andrade ; Byrd ; Gregory ; Sabatini https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/233
Postsecondary Education; Prohibits State Board of Education and BOG from shielding students, staff, and faculty from certain speech; requires State Board of Education to conduct annual assessment on intellectual freedom & viewpoint diversity; creates a cause of action for recording or publication of certain video or audio recordings; revises provisions related to protected expressive activity, university student governments, & codes of conduct.
Proponents of the bill believe that it will save another generation from being indoctrinated by ” pinko ideals.” Most professors oppose the bill saying it will interfere with academic freedom. It would also promote the creation of “thought police” and impede First Amendment rights. This is right wing cancel culture.
nicely summarized
Here’s what Parents Defending Education is doing in Boston; this is their local affiliate.
https://bpcae.com
BPCAE suing school committee for new exam school admissions
A little background: several organizations have for some 8 years tried to change admissions policies to Boston Latin School, Boston Latin Academy, and the O’Bryant School of Math and Science. The schools’ populations are not reflective of the student body as a whole. The exam used, the ISEE, was based on curricula used at private and parochial schools, but not in Boston’s schools. The Education Records Bureau, the owner of the ISEE, finally refused to continue to provide the exam to the school system, because it wasn’t validated for our student population.
Pre-covid, the superintendent, Brenda Cassillius, had put out a bid for a new test, which was granted to NWEA, which owns the MAP. Then covid happened, testing could not be done, and the reforms long talked about, but not acted upon seemed within reach. A long school committee meeting (in which the chairman made racist remarks on a hot mic and subsequently had to resign) ended with this compromise, for this school year only:
Up to 20% of seats at each exam school are reserved for the top ranking students in the city based on GPA in English and Math; the remaining 80% will be a combination of GPA and zip code.Why zip code? Boston is extremely segregated and zip codes are a good proxy for race and socioeconomic status. Admissions by exams disfavor, as we all know, kids from low income. And there’s a task force to come up with a new policy:
Building upon the work initiated by the Superintendent’s Exam Schools Admissions Criteria Working Group, the Boston School Committee Exam Schools Admissions Task Force is charged with developing a set of recommendations for the admissions policy for Boston Public Schools exam schools. The desired outcome is to expand the applicant pool and create an admissions process that will support student enrollment at each of the exam schools such that rigor is maintained and the student body better reflects the racial, socioeconomic, and geographic diversity of all students (K-12) in the city of Boston. The Task Force shall consider use of the new NWEA assessment and other factors, and leverage learning from a full review of the implementation of the SY 21-22 admissions criteria, as well as a thorough review of practices in other districts.
So BPCAE, which never existed before and has never been a part of the conversation, sued. Reach your own conclusions about who props them up.
Here’s the source for the above citation:
https://www.bostonpublicschools.org/domain/2931
[…] The following post first appeared on Diane Ravitch’s Blog, link here. […]
[…] unknown due to weak disclosure laws. However, we do know that these groups have close ties to the Koch network and GOP […]
[…] unknown due to weak disclosure laws. However, we know that these organizations have close ties the Koch network GOP […]