Reema Amin, a reporter for Chalkbeat in New York, wrote on Twitter that the Success Academy charter chain will not administer the state tests this year. Do you think that any public school superintendents or principals will make the same decision and get away with it? Nah, we won’t take the state tests this year.
SA is experienced at breaking laws. It is the onus of the executive branch and its U.S. Department of Education to enforce the laws without prejudice. Shut SA down.
I just found out from the CTA, the California State Board of Education voted Tuesday to “let school districts use either state tests or other standards-aligned assessments to gauge student learning this spring.” Maybe my district will be able to legally give non-SBAC state tests.
Maybe I will not have to proctor the state tests this year!
That would be a huge relief. I know from the SBAC Interim tests, SBAC tests cannot be done online, and threatening to force us to give the SBAC has already been causing too much distraction for teachers and administrators. District tests are much the less evil of two evils
If states are forced to give a standardized test, they should substitute one of the older standardized tests that did go through the norming process like The California Achievement Test, the IOWA or even the Terra Nova. Scores will likely be higher than today’s state tests based on the CCSS. Giving harder tests is bound to lift students out of poverty, NOT! I just had to say it. Schools have been forced to subject our students to such idiocy for too long. Better yet, launch a mass opt out led by concerned parents.
I am sure they are afraid they won’t be able to attain their vaunted test scores in this environment, so the in-school requirement provides the excuse. Much like they blamed the DOE for their inability to provide in-person schooling this year, whereas my guess is that the real reason why they are fully remote is because they could not hire enough teachers to make hybrid learning work.