Ann Cook, executive director and co-founder of the New York State Performance Standards Consortium, and Phyllis Tashlik, director of the Consortium’s Center for Inquiry in Teaching and Learning, argue in this article in the New York Daily News that the spring testing should be canceled. The Consortium, a group of a few dozen high schools in New York, has an exemption from most state testing and has produced better academic outcomes (graduation rates, college entry, college retention) than the other public schools in the city with similar students. My guess is that they could make a powerful argument that standardized testing is unnecessary and wasteful.
Across the country, national and local groups — including the majority of parents — are calling on the federal government to waive standardized testing requirements for states in the spring. New York should be one of the leaders of that effort. Instead, it remains one of only 10 states to link standardized exams, in this case Regents exams, to high school graduation.
We’re in the throes of a pandemic with no consistency to school attendance, WiFi reception, or access to computers. In this climate, not only would a fresh round of standardized tests lack any validity or reliability, they would be a tragic waste of resources and effort...
Instead, let’s use stretched budgets to educate kids in ways that will support them and better meet their very real and critical needs, both academic and emotional...
Why outsource questions about what students know and can do to companies that produce standardized tests — commercial publishers that don’t know our students or our schools? ..
Good assessments grow out of curriculum, and provide deeper inquiry into subjects instead of relying on multiple-choice and formulaic essays. When assessments are imposed arbitrarily, they just encourage simplistic and rote teaching and create rigid categories of “winners” and “losers.”
We need to use this crisis to reimagine what school can be. Instead of going backwards to policies that serve to sort and rank kids, we need to value higher goals for instruction, gain a deeper appreciation for what learning is, and show respect for kids’ individual talents and interests...
We face enormous challenges as we transition to a post-COVID world. There’s been plenty of talk about social and emotional learning, but we need to do more than just talk. Students need to feel empowered so they can believe in themselves again. That will be the best way to help. More standardized testing will only disempower them and rob them of what they need most — our time, our commitment, our belief in their capacity to learn and grow.

I just don’t think pushing standardized testing “counts” as a response to the pandemic.
These same people all pushed testing before the pandemic and they’ll all push it after.
So far- the “ideas” we have gotten for public school students post-pandemic are identical to what we got prior to that pandemic- testing for public school students and promoting and marketing charters and vouchers.
How is that a “response”? It’s identical to what the ed reform echo chamber always promote.
Do any of them have anything else, or is “testing, charters and vouchers” all we’re likely to get? Because we already had all that.
LikeLike
Hah … more $$$$$ for the FEW. Sick.
LikeLiked by 1 person
always: the few know how to play this game so well, now
LikeLike
Performance standards are a more meaningful, superior way to evaluate students. It allows students to explore, think, create and express learning in a variety of meaningful ways. It is an engaging process which will result in a deep understanding of a topic. There is no stack ranking based on an unreliable algorithm.
When my son graduated from a New Jersey magnet high school, he had to complete a senior project. He chose to do a project with the Water Keeper Alliance. He had a half day each week to work on the project which involved sampling water from a local river under various conditions, running tests and analyzing the results. In addition to writing up the results of the project, he did an oral presentation in front of a board of professionals that asked him questions about the project. He learned about various pollutants in the water and how they impact the health of people in the local area. Twenty years later, if I ask my son about his senior project, he can still tell me what he learned from it. He still belongs to the Water Keeper Alliance and continues to test local water.
The difference between a self-directed project and a bubble test is significant. In project based learning the student is responsible for driving the learning, and they take charge of the process. It is a self-directed process that requires the student to work independently. It involves research, time management and organization, all of which will help students in college and life. Bubble tests do nothing for students other than teach them how to game the system, and they learn nothing in exchange for the time spend in test prep or test taking.
LikeLike
As you have for many years, Diane, you lay out the great and irrefutable arguments. Nonetheless, these tests — like the politicians who enable them — are bought and paid for. At this point, I would be shocked if tests were not required in spring of 2021. The data must be preserved! Initial indicators are that they won’t be used for school or teacher evaluation (my understanding of Georgia, for example, is that where applicable the tests will only be 1% of a teacher’s eval rather than the normal higher percentage), but it’s ESSENTIAL to get new numbers…so that future high-stakes evaluations can return.
What can WE do to stop the Reformers and their ability to strong arm all education policy?
LikeLike
I’m amazed we even need to have this conversation.
LikeLike
My guess, Mark, is that there is too much money involved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A logical conclusion–and a correct one, I am confident.
LikeLike
“..In this climate, not only would a fresh round of standardized tests lack any validity or reliability, they would be a tragic waste of resources and effort.”
This would be true in any climate since the basis for these tests is intellectually bankrupt.
LikeLike
Betsy DeVos did not even know what IDEA was. I wonder if Miguel Cardona knows what it is. He probably does, right? Yeah. But I bet he doesn’t know that it’s not anywhere near adequately funded. Or maybe he knows, but doesn’t care. He seems to care about giving money to testing companies instead. He seems to care about letting test scores be used to privatize schools. He seems to want to let charter schools expand and push the burden of paying for IDEA onto public schools so that students who are on the wrong side of the “gap” get shortchanged even worse. If he cares about test scores, he does not care about public schools or public school students.
LikeLike
Not sure what the big deal is. NYC is trumpeting “record-high graduation rates” from last year, despite the school year having ended in March and massive numbers of students either choosing not to log on or being unable to log on to remote learning . So obviously students are doing great despite the pandemic. Who knows, maybe graduation rates this year will set yet another record!
LikeLike
There are a couple national petitions to sign:
https://www.teachersforgoodtrouble.org/
https://www.fairtest.org/national-call-suspend-highstakes-testing-spring-20
LikeLike