Randi Weingarten proposes an alternative to end of the year tests. This is such a good idea that Congress should consider making it a replacement for annual standardized tests, which are inherently an assertion that teachers can’t be trusted to judge their students’ progress. Furthermore, Randi’s idea of testing what students know and can do will inspire student thoughtfulness and creativity, which is far superior to picking the right answer.
Classrooms that would have been abuzz with activity now sit empty, as most states have closed schools to slow the spread of COVID-19. These have been agonizing choices because schools are not simply where students learn, they are where many children receive meals and healthcare, where they learn life lessons, forge relationships and build resiliency. We are all feeling the shockwaves of this unprecedented upheaval.
But as educators and school staff know, the majority of the instructional year has already taken place, and students have learned and experienced much already. The federal government will waive federally mandated assessments as a result of the widespread school closures. There are still meaningful ways teachers can help students sum up their academic progress and bring closure to this school year. So, at this extraordinary time, I propose ending the school year by giving all teachers the latitude to work with their students on capstone or term projects instead of statewide standardized assessments — to choose age appropriate activities, assessments and projects that demonstrate their learning for the year. This flexibility will both allow districts to ensure that our school communities maintain the social distancing necessary to avoid further spread of the virus and give our students the chance to end their school year on a positive note.
Nearly 53 million of the country’s 57 million K-12 students have been affected by school closures. That number is likely to grow, and the situation is likely to persist, as states like Kansas decide to close public schools for the rest of the school year. Educators are building the plane while flying it. Within the span of one week, districts across the country have rushed to open “grab-and-go” meal centers, launch distance learning programs, meet the needs of our most vulnerable children, and provide child care for the frontline healthcare and other essential workers who are protecting the health and safety of all Americans. And state and district leaders are trying to figure this out with little guidance from the federal government, and what guidance they’ve gotten has often been unclear or contradictory.
As these logistical challenges continue to be addressed, our members across the country are simultaneously creating plans to ensure that their students’ learning does not end with the closure of their school buildings and trying to ascertain whether their efforts have succeeded. There are many ways outside of state accountability systems to show student learning, as teachers can attest. They just need the freedom to use their professional judgment. Teachers do this throughout the year — administering tests and guiding students on projects and portfolios. We know that students love to show what they know to people who matter to them. We need to trust teachers, in consultation with their principals and colleagues, to design meaningful, educationally appropriate tasks. For example: Elementary students could complete a composition on a favorite book they read this year, which could be turned in by sending it back on the same bus that is delivering grab-and-go meals (while observing scientists’ recommendations regarding safe paper handling). Middle school students could hold a virtual debate on the internet, or they could interview a relative for a family history, which is the quintessential American story. High school students could research a topic they now won’t be covering in class and present their research via video on their phone. Because of the digital divide, many students do not have access to computers, smart phones or internet hot spots, so the tried-and-true writing — or drawing or composing music — with pen and paper, should be envisioned as well.
Teachers will need time and support to develop plans for project-based assessments that are appropriate given their students’ ages, special education requirements, proficiency in English, physical needs and access to technology. This is especially important since many will be used in the context of remote learning. Local latitude and autonomy is important. Let’s give educators, working with their colleagues and administrators, the freedom to figure this out, including the freedom to determine how high school seniors can finish the year and graduate.
Teachers are working hard to maintain essential connections with their students. Let’s trust them to develop the kinds of end-of-year activities, assessments and capstone projects I am proposing. Let’s trust them to use their expertise and knowledge of their students, because no idea will work for every student and teacher. My hope is to capture and celebrate student learning and, in the process, show that we trust teachers.
Show me something you’ve learned. A project. That’s of value. Great value.
But not now. We need to write off this school year, period. This is not the time. Once this is all over, though, a great idea.
cx: We need to write off the rest of this school year.
However, creating opportunities for CREATIVE collaboration by students, now, at a distance, online, great.
Here, one of my favorite videos ever. These kids from all around the world collaborating in this tune via the Net:
How much learning takes place after spring break considering that time is usually spent on the standards and testing malpractice regime?
Cancel the rest of the year. Let the kids enjoy being out of school.
Two bits says that if the schools are opened in August, the “authorities” will want to start them in Mid-July to “make up time”. Ay ay ay ay ay ay.
Exactly, Duane. In my recent school, the last month and a half was entirely taken up by testing. Almost nothing else happened during that time.
I agree, Bob. One of the funny parts of Amy Chua’s Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mom was her revelation that all parents groan when teachers assign a project. Why? Because the parents end up doing most of it. If Yale professors’ kids falter when given a complex, do-it-all-at-home assignment, imagine what it’s like for an average or below-average student! Most won’t do the assignment (enter zero in the grade book), and most of those who do will produce something crappy (enter a merciful D into the grade book), to be very blunt. The most talented and ambitious families will produce something decent, not because the project is a joy, but because they want their A’s. Bad idea, Randi.
Cx: I agree that we should not do projects this year, not that projects are a great idea.
Just like the dreaded Science Fair projects!!! OMG NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!
Parents hate getting their project assignments from school. All except a few crafty ones. LOL.
Yes, you know when the kids mother is a nuclear physicist at Yale and the kid builds a hydrogen bomb for a project, that the mom probably did all the work.
SomeDAM. I made a firm rule with my students. No hydrogen bombs in class. Sure, there were probably some who violated this behind my back, but what ya gonna do?
Just out of curiosity, whatever happened to 1) English, history, and social studies teachers just giving reading assignments out of a textbook and having their kids write short essays or book reports, and 2) math and science teachers giving reading assignments out of their textbooks and assigning exercises in the book?
This requires no fancy online tools. Assignments could be sent out by email and students could do their work on paper in their own handwriting, snap photos, and email them back to their teachers. Teachers could actually GRADE THEM (gasp!). I keep hearing about digital divides and other excuses, but I have yet to encounter a student who doesn’t have access to a cell phone.
“We don’t need no steekin’” worksheets, Zoom videoconferencing, online assessments, etc. Education worked like this, except for the email, for decades. Sadly, too many kids are no longer accustomed to teaching themselves out of books. Kids could email questions to their teacher and the teacher could collect them and answer them all at once in one Youtube video.
There are still two months left in the school. Since there will not be the stupid standardized tests, why should we waste this time! Seems to me that some real learning could actually take place, i.e., at least some kids could learn to teach themselves from books again!!! That could be a real silver lining to all of this doom and gloom!
Of course! -Assess students the way we did prior to common core and yearly weeks and weeks of standardized testing. Now that’s a novel idea.
Exactly. All this testing has cost billions and billions and devolved our curricula and had NO POSITIVE EFFECT on learning and has been NO IMPROVEMENT on just doing the classroom tests that we always did, for decades and decades, before that.
https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2020/03/19/why-we-need-to-end-high-stakes-standardized-testing-now/
“Educators are building the plane while flying it.”
Stupidest statement ever spoken. . .
. . . other than “Tests measure. . . “
Yeah. Only in education do you get absolutely ridiculous statements like this.
From someone who is not a teacher.
As Duane points out, these stupid statements don’t come from teachers but they bolster the view perpetuated by politicians that teachers are idiots.
YUP. And, to compound this, they are not qualified for engineering of this kind in the best of circumstances.
When he was NY Commissioner of Education, John King used to use that phrase about building the plane while flying it. That’s how he rationalized the introduction of Common Core, over the objections of angry parents.
Actually, building the plane while flying it is what Boeing does.
Or at the very least, crashing the plane while flying it.
More like building the plane while its in a tailspin.
Most districts in Texas are dragging their feet about calling it a year. They keep hoping we will be back after Easter. Based on the latest report it will be mid-May before this peaks in Texas. The more they delay cancelling the rest of the year the more they delay the planning process for online or alternative instruction.
https://abc13.com/health/heres-when-experts-say-covid-19-could-end-in-houston/6049321/
Teachers should be allowed to use this time to plan for next year. When would they ever get this much time to really plan a cohesive program? They could consult with each other easily through social media. Next year will be challenging because of this shortened year of learning. Teachers should be talking to each other to figure out how to make up math subjects that are prerequisites for the next course, e.g., or how to compress other lost learning. I’m afraid that if teachers don’t take the initiative, directives will come (eventually) from the careerists who fill administrations and we all know how successful that top-down stuff works.
Teachers should be allowed to use this time to plan for next year.
Amen to this, Andrea!!! Well said!!!
But the morons in charge no longer take teachers seriously as professionals–don’t recognize that they CAN plan. They want them all scripted or replaced by depersonalized education software.
I can remember when my older sister used to “work” (very minimal pay) in the summer writing curriculum with other teachers for the following school year. But of course teachers are now too stupid to be able to do this since all those big business people with no classroom experience have decided what kids need to know and at what age it should magically be taught/learned.
It saddens me to see calls about taking teachers seriously as professionals and then to see the negative blowback about encouraging and supporting practitioner research. A core characteristic of all professions is ownership of the knowledge of the field. We are so very far from that in education.
But that’s where we used to be. Teachers need to be empowered to retake their classrooms. We need union leadership there. No scripting of teachers. No standardized tests. No district-mandated curricula.
Here’s how far we’ve fallen. What I’m describing is how it used to be. How it always was. Now it sounds completely radical.
I was in the midst of assigning some Climate Change group projects when we headed out. Even the implementation of this was hampered by the Almighty Illinois Science Assessment mandated for my 5th graders. Three hours for that. Had we gone back on March 16th, we would have had to then implement IAR, PARCC Illinois’ bastard child. Eight to ten hours of that. The kids don’t care about either test. It’s hard to pretend that we (teachers) do. All around it’s a shit show and a pathetic excuse for making children productive members of society. Oh, and we are a school with many ELs so you have to test them a bunch, too. Then NWEA in May. Since 2000, CPS testing of elementary ed has increased to the point where at least one week or two per ten is devoted to testing or make ups (did I mention that all this testing drops the attendance rate?). Compare that to twenty years ago when there was one big test in May or even early June. Looking back I tell colleagues that i regret not getting a HS certificate, as mandated test mania impacts those groups less.
Another thought with regards to if and when we return for AY 20. It’s my thinking that districts serving larger free lunch populations will see greater pressure to return than those in say, Marin County, Lake County, or Westchester county. After all, the choice to leave school was made first by those districts. No surprise to anyone I think.
MSS. Feel your pain! Such a waste of time, energy, resources!
Do they care about group projects?
An excellent idea! Thanks to Randi W. Also, Include with the project-based learning meaningful opportunities for action research and practitioner research. Our Foundation would love to support this by publishing reports: https://www.socialpublishersfoundation.org/knowledge-base/. It is free and we provide support and mentoring as appropriate. We support practitioner research as an alternative to the knowledge monopoly that proclaims (falsely we believe) that only “top experts” in education have important things to say about educational practices. Join with us in moving from good ideas to action: https://www.socialpublishersfoundation.org/publish/. For questions, contacthttps://www.socialpublishersfoundation.org/contact/. Best wishes to all.
Most kids and parents hate projects. There’s no proof they result in better learning.
My kids would agree. The only thing they hate more is a “group project.”
What a funny comment, really. What evidence do you have of your assertion?
Right, group projects require collaboration, which is tough for many Americans, for sure. Just ask all the kids partying on the beach during a global pandemic!
Project based learning conflates the way highly educated specialists do their work with the best ways for beginners to learn. Most serious students see it for what it is, a waste of time.
I hate group projects more than my kids!!! My kids are usually the ones doing most of the work while the others would take the credit. There is always the Bossy leader who tells everyone what and how to do it, but isn’t willing to do any of the work, 1 that does most of the work, 1 that helps in the beginning but is apt to keep throwing a monkey wrench into things, and 1-2 that sit around and do absolutely nothing. Oh, how I’ve hated the words, “Mom, I have a group project….”.
thank you for saying truth: and ditto FLERP about group projects
If this is enough to end a school year, why (when the things return to normal) not shorten school hours to, say, four hours a day at least for elementary schoolkids? Or shorten class time to no more than 40 minutes? Or increase breaks between classes from 4 to at least 10 minutes? Or extend summer break to three full months instead of barely two that kids have now?
A “composition on a favorite book” can be done in any grade irrespective of current program, likewise a “virtual debate” and “research a topic”. None of these items is even remotely linked to what kids are supposed to study in school in a particular grade. I cannot see these recommendations as anything but an attempt to simulate educational activity where there is none.
The point of state tests, which existed even before NCLB, was exactly in NOT giving “the freedom to figure this out” to individual teachers and local administrators to ensure that all students throughout a state or even the nation received the same minimum of knowledge and skills in respect to their grade. What is being suggested would return us back to zillions of princedoms that teach whatever they feel like, if anything at all.
Teachers in elite private schools—like Lakeside in Seattle, where Bill Gates sent his children—teach as they choose, without reference to state standards and tests. Seems to work well.
Yep. When I was hired for my first job, I asked the headmaster how he wanted me to teach the courses I was assigned. His answer, as I recall, was close to, “That’s why I hired you, figure it out.” His only requirement was to check in occasionally with my fellow teachers, my department head, and very occasionally with him. It worked very well. Never had anything dictated to me, never had testing.
“What is being suggested would return us back to zillions of princedoms that teach whatever they feel like, if anything at all.”
Horse manure!
Is this jlsteach with a new name?
Although you are being truthful in stating “to ensure that all students throughout a state or even the nation received the same minimum of knowledge and skills in respect to their grade.”
That is historically what standards and learning by objective have produced–minimal knowledge. It has always worked out that way from programmed learning in the 60s/70s to Objective Based Learning of the 80s/90s to the CCSS of this century. Minimal competencies. Throw on top of the current CCSS all of the invalid, illogical, unethical, unjust and immoral usages of the standardized test scores and we have ended up with a mind boggling education malpractice regime that has served to kill student’s desire to learn and has harmed all students in the process.
The teaching profession needs to have a “Cause no harm” ethics that is completely lacking now.
Standards-based, test-and-punish “reform” began with NCLB in 2002.
Those who claim that prior to this, teachers were free to teach anything they wanted are sadly mistaken. The reality was that academic teachers used textbooks as the de-facto curriculum, because they were selected, usually by committees of teachers and administrators, because they were aligned with standards and curricula. Since the advent of NCLB, the tests became the de-fact curriculum for math and ELA. Testing proponents still haven’t owned up to the 800 lb gorilla riding the elephant in the room: the vast majority of teachers and student instructional time has been and always will be in non-tested subjects.
More of a democratic process though, at that time. Today it’s an email that says, in effect, here’s the calendar window, it’s mandated, suck it up and do it. Over and over and over. Sadly, I don’t see myself getting any better at this job with the status quo. Throw in the blackout on suspensions and the screen time (for all of us), i’ll probably be getting worse. Ironic that now that i kind of have a grasp of pedagogy, it’s a sinking ship. While I am glad in the short term that testing is likely canceled, publishers aren’t going away like my junior colleagues are.
Rage: In the 1970s there was a huge debate going on in U.S. education between people who believed that decisions about kids’ educations should be made by teachers at the building level and those who believed that districts should exert more power over curricula and pedagogy. As this debate was raging, some districts chose to split the difference and issue curriculum guidelines. Typically, textbooks were chosen by committees of teachers within schools. The English Department would be given a budget and would meet, under the direction of its chairperson, and make textbook and supplemental purchasing decisions. In some schools and departments, there was a particularly authoritarian department chairperson who would himself or herself make the decisions about texts and issue directives about what was to be taught when. In a few schools, the principals or APs would get involved in these decisions, but typically, they considered the department chairpeople to be the experts and deferred to them.
In general, teachers followed the outlines of their texts, but they had a LOT of leeway. Some English teachers chose to integrate their literature, writing, and grammar instruction. Some did separate units on each. They, or their departments, typically chose what supplemental novels and plays their kids would read. Teachers made their own tests. They planned their own lessons according to their own notions about how best to approach that. In those days, a department meeting was a pretty big deal because a lot of real work was done there–sharing lesson plans and materials, discussing what approaches to take to various topics, debating what texts and supplementals to use, etc. Gradually, districts started wresting power from building-level administrators and teachers. They started issuing district-level curriculum guidelines and choosing textbooks at the district level. THERE WAS A LOT OF OPPOSITION TO THIS.
It wasn’t until the 1980s that most states, emboldened by the Nation at Risk Report, that most states started issuing state standards and curriculum outlines. Before that, some had broad, general state frameworks, but many didn’t even have those.
In other words, it is indeed the case that in the past most teachers in most public schools in the U.S. weren’t micromanaged by districts, the state, and the feds. And guess what? Education was arguably better.
So, no. I am not “sadly mistaken” about that.
Now, to address the issue of an anarchy of competing fiefdoms. The fact is that when decision-making about curricula and pedagogy was in the hands of teachers at the building level, there was remarkable uniformity around the country. The 9th graders were all reading Romeo and Juliet; the 10th graders, Julius Caesar; the 11th or 12th graders, Hamlet or Macbeth. If you opened the lit textbooks from that time or the grammar and composition textbooks, you would see that they contained the same selections, for the most part, and covered the same topics. Why? Habits of the tribe. And guess what? The lit texts contained, as they always did, substantive classics from the canon. (Lord Coleman didn’t invent that idea.)
However, back then, teachers had autonomy and were treated as professionals, and so they rose to the occasion and acted that way. They took all of this–the course planning, the materials selection, the debates on pedagogical approaches–very, very seriously.
Gradually, all power and authority, all autonomy, has been stripped from them. At first there was enormous resistance. But over time, this became a boiled frog phenomenon.
We have infantilized our teachers. Terrible, terrible mistake.
People don’t do their best work in conditions of low autonomy, when that work is micromanaged and scripted. Such scripting, such micromanaging, alienates the worker from his or her work.
I know this was so, Rage, because that’s the way it was when I first started working in textbook publishing in the late 1970s. Most states didn’t have state standards. A few had general frameworks. Then, a couple did. Many districts had curriculum guidelines. We in textbook publishing paid attention to these, of course, but we put a lot of energy into polling teachers to see what they wanted. And when we sat down to plan a textbook, we did so based on the habits of the tribe (what others had always done) and on those varying guidelines and frameworks and polls, but mostly, we did the planning based on what we thought made sense in order to approach a given subject (intro Economics, British literature) coherently.
Now, increasingly, coherence is out the window. ElA courseware has devolved to a string of random exercises on random “skills” from the Gates/Coleman bullet list. Egregious.
Over this period, from the late seventies to today, teaching has been steadily deprofessionalized, teachers have been robbed of the autonomy they once had, and quality has declined precipitously, which is incredibly ironic given that all that stealing of teacher autonomy was an attempt to improve things, to introduce top-down quality control.
But that’s not how good quality control works.
And this is important: under the old system, of building- and classroom-level autonomy, everyone throughout the system was freer to innovate. A particular teacher could champion an idea–let’s do sentence combining, let’s use a writing process approach, and sell it and see it adopted in his or her school. A particular editor in an educational publishing house could do the same. Gates claimed that the Common [sic] Coring of U.S. education would be a great spur to innovation. Utter nonsense. Exactly what a monopolist would say. You don’t get innovation by dictating to people. Obviously.
A silent scourge is sweeping America. Thousands and thousands of district administrators, state department officials, and politicians have succumbed to standardized testing derangement syndrome, STDs. Practice professional distancing from these people. Remove them from office. Isolate them for treatment.
Of course, our national unions and professional organizations should have isolated the carriers and nipped this in the bud in the beginning before it infected the entire educational system. Shame on them.
But it’s not to late!
Red for Ed for the Cure!
End the standardized testing now!
We can beat this.
Symptoms: delirium, babbling about “data,” inability to think rationally about matters like validity and relevance
Exactamundo!
STDs, that’s a great term for what is happening to our young people.
I’m very much hoping that that one will catch on.
Standardized testing derangement syndrome. STDs.
It is too late in the school year for teachers to initiate anything like projects and especially capstone projects deliberately planned as ASSESSMENTS and tasks (Randi’s words) while students are at home, often with parents and siblings who are doing their best to survive the pandemic, and each other, in close quarters. So far, two states have closed schools for the rest of the year. Many more states with announced dates of closure have expectations for reopening in time for some few remaing weeks. Those plans could change.
With or without the pandemic, Project-based learning has become a HOT marketplace.
See for example, the Project-based Works website and just posted ideas for “remote learning.” https://www.pblworks.org/blog/school-closures-using-pbl-remote-learning
The Summit charter school franchise requires project-based learning. “Student projects are designed to enliven specific course content and without compromising standards.” Among these standards are the Common Core and Next Generation Science Standards. https://blog.summitlearning.org/2018/10/summit-learning-project-based-curriculum/
For another example of “capstone projects” based on policies that insist on “rigor” and stipulations about meeting standards, see this publication from Arizona. Examples of capstone projects in the arts that might earn a “seal” of merit can be found on page 13.
Click to access Arts-Seal-Guidance-10.28.2019.pdf
For high school seniors, I have yet to see anything better than these powerful invited posts from Chris Deir, Teacher of the Year in Louisiana. He who was a high school senior when Katrina hit. He offers two posts at the invitation of Mercedes Schneider. Read both of them. These have gone viral. See why.
https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2020/03/15/la-teacher-of-the-year-an-open-letter-to-high-school-seniors-during-coronavirus-crisis/
and
https://deutsch29.wordpress.com/2020/03/21/class-of-2020-redeem-your-senior-year/
https://joebiden.com/education/ https://joebiden.com/beyondhs/
“It is too late in the school year for teachers to initiate anything like projects and especially capstone projects….”
This. Projects are not things that can be pulled out of anyone’s, um, left shoe. To be proper learning experiences, projects have to be developed over several months, in direct collaboration with the students as a group. When, as mentioned, some students don’t have access to the internet (and some might not have food or a place to stay), this is not the time to be haphazardly pulling together some kind of big capstone project for grades. Any school for the rest of the year should really be more about play and exploration and grades should go out the window (as they should have before this mess, but that’s a different rant).
Like!
BTW, if we “cencel the school year” would we continue to pay teachers? My grand daughter, 5th grade, has a series of min-projects, keeping her busy, and she enjoy s them ,,, my son, a school adminstrator, has been on zoom with teachers and staff most of the day planning, every day is vital …
Yes, teachers should continue to get paid!!! They get paid this time of year anyway when all they are doing is administering stupid invalid tests. Use the saved testing money to pay the teachers and then have the teachers start writing curriculum to get rid of the ridiculous Common Core (or whatever name the state has adopted for the same standards). I, personally love hearing the sound of laughing children in the neighborhood as they ride their bikes and rollerblades, or as they are scavenger hunting. They are learning as they play. They are learning to live a life without “things” to keep them occupied 24/7.
I wonder if the testing giants will give refunds to states that don’t give the tests. I bet they keep the money.
Of course they keep the money, They will need some of it to help finance the next campaign and election of the politician who will design educational legislation to go favorably for the testing company.
It’s a lovely cycle. Round and round . . . . . Lather, rinse, repeat . . . .
Diane,
It’s wonderful that Randi is changing her tune to reflect popular and mainstream thinking. As someone who has locked in her power and structured her union to virtually never get rid of a President, maybe she will nonetheless do a 180 and become another Diane Ravitch.
Maybe she will reflect upon her grotesque and corrupt governance and really listen to her constituents, students, and parents. She is showing signs of this. There is aways the potential. Maybe she has the capability of permanently righting many wrongs.
Maybe . . . .
My district is calling for us to continue the SBAC interim assessments of nothing related to learning, even though the high stakes SBAC summative assessments of nothing related to learning have been cancelled. Weingarten is right and the district is wrong. We teachers just need to be allowed to use our professional judgement to implement the tests, projects, and portfolios we use to assess progress; it’s much less of the students’ time and money wasted, and much better, more meaningful and useful results.
And now is the time. Remember the barf bags some schools keep ready so that students, especially younger ones, don’t throw up on the tests because of the stress. Now is not the time— never is it the time to make students sick.
Exactly. When is the right time to give these tests?
Never
. . . ever!
So. Is it never or ever? Now that would make a great test question!
Neverever!
Quoth the raven, nevermore!
Bob Shepherd says, “No scripting of teachers. No standardized tests. No district-mandated curricula. What I’m describing is how it used to be.” Interesting. RageAgainstTheTestocracy claims that at least in his district “academic teachers used textbooks as the de-facto curriculum [which] were aligned with standards.” This is how it should be. Requiring every teacher to create their own course is a waste of time and resources, and after all, teachers are not very good at this.
Andrea Lancer suggests that teachers should plan for next year, should be talking to each other and “consult with each other easily through social media.” Well, as study finds, “most English lessons on Teachers Pay Teachers and other sites are ‘mediocre’ or ‘not worth using.’” Same for science, the materials are full of errors. Curricula and courses should be created by people who know both about a particular subject they are writing as well as about pedagogical tricks of teaching it. Courses should be connected year-to-year and subject-to-subject. Teachers should learn these programs, be able to deliver them to students and be able to answer whatever questions the students ask that are within the bounds of this program. As of now, many teachers cannot even pass a high-school math test. I would not trust them to create their own curricula.
As for tests, it is not the fault of test makers that educators are using tests as de-facto curricula instead of using them as a quality control tool. If tests do not align with the program adopted by a district, the district should either disregard or modify the tests. On the other hand, if individual teachers create their courses themselves, they have no other choice as to use tests as a yardstick. Therefore, the current issue with tests being used as curricula stems from weak district control over curricula and from “empowered” teachers who, left to their own devices by the district, cannot do anything better than teach to the test.
“It is not the fault of test makers that educators are using tests as de-facto curricula instead of using them as a quality control tool.”
Ahh yes another of Medusa’s heads. Teachers too comfortable with screen time tests rather than actually showing up early and planning their days. Part of me feels that ELA and MATH teachers look forward to testing so that they don’t have to plan. We were supposed to start PARCC two weeks ago. That means that i get to walk in the door with the students at 9 am instead of 7:45, because hey, testing.
“As for tests, it is not the fault of test makers that educators are using tests as de-facto curricula instead of using them as a quality control tool.”
The test writers are not to blame at all. The fault lies with federal policies/law, including NCLB, RTTT, and now ESSA.
It was the pressures to produce a constant increase in test scores that turned the standards-that-were-tested into the de-facto curricula of math and ELA – and science to a lesser extent.
“As of now, many teachers cannot even pass a high-school math test.”
Horse Manure!
Take you teacher bashing and shove it where the sun don’t shine!
Unfortunately, Pear$on (&, I’m sure, other te$ting companie$) have multi-year contract$, $o have been paid in advance with our tax dollar$. “Will $tate$ get refund$?” Hell,no!
Start testing more Americans for covid-19….NOW!
$top.”$tandardized.”Te$ting.Now…& FOREVER!
I was outside a good part of yesterday. There are lots of jobs to do here in the country when winter starts to really end. I also went and uncovered the old spring out in one of our fields. No cell phone works there so I was truly out of touch.
The idea is that if there’s a typical, garden variety power outage due to something like a bad storm, the line crews could be stretched thin the next few months If they’re shorthanded, our corner of the world might have to wait much longer than usual for the lights to come back on. And the pump that draws the water up for our house to kick back into service.
So, I was cleaning up the spring. It’s been there for generations. Nearby there are trees much older than the last major pandemic in the U.S. 100 years ago. I was way beyond the range of anyone hearing me even if I shouted at the top of my lungs, standing there in the cool, mountain breeze. It kind of put this current global disaster in a bit of context -at least for a few moments.
And the thought came to me there on that hillside: it’s incredible how WARPED our priories have been for our schools -and our entire society. Less than two weeks out of the usual school routine and it is so clear how warped and demented so many things have become.
I’m heading back down there later this morning. There’s still a lot of work to be done.
The sun is out today and it’s getting stronger every spring day that goes by.
Take care.
Supt. Matsuda, you are a great inspiration. At this time when some of us are physically isolated, you bring us together in mind. What a wonderful world this would be if we would have world leaders with your frame of mind leading the world – thinking of others instead of self-gratification. Oh what a paradise we would live in if everyone had the disposition that reflected:
“Those were the times of amazing grace, when people came together with kindness and compassion to support each other, when they made sacrifices for complete strangers, when schools became beacons of hope for families who were food deprived, and when teachers transformed educational experiences through emotional connection, through affirming mental health, and through meaningful learning.”
What meaningful words, “Let us take this journey by learning how to forgive, beginning with ourselves. Let us be gentle and kind to our loved ones. Let us practice mindfulness, self-compassion and prayer. Let us just love.”
Oh what a beautiful world this would be if this spirit spread throughout the world instead of just our community.
It is in giving that we receive. You can’t give away happiness; it keeps bouncing back at you.
What do you in cases where teachers use subjective and or bias opinions to judge classwork yet the student aces standardized tests? Just saying you need both.