Teresa Hanafin writes the daily “Fast Forward” for the Boston Globe.
She writes:
It’s the last day for House Democrats to argue why senators should find Trump guilty and remove him from office. Yesterday they focused on the first article of impeachment, abuse of power; today they tackle the second, obstruction of Congress.
In making the case yesterday that Trump abused the power of his office, once again the House managers were clear, methodical, and thorough, using video, e-mails, and other material they were able to obtain from witnesses since Trump has tried to block everyone and everything (hence the obstruction charge).
They even showed a clip of South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham arguing during the Clinton impeachment trial that a president need not have committed a crime to be removed from office. Why show that? Because now that a Republican is in the White House, Graham is arguing the exact opposite.
But the closing statement by lead manager Adam Schiff stole the show, and his passionate and emotional plea that “Here, right matters” went viral before he had even sat down.
Schiff was echoing the testimony of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman,an Iraq War veteran who had told the House Intelligence Committee that he wanted to reassure his father not to worry about his decision to defy Trump and show up to testify. Why shouldn’t his father worry?
“Because this is America,” he said. “This is the country I have served and defended, that all of my brothers have served. And here, right matters.”
It was the perfect phrase for Schiff to adopt last night. After he pointed out that when it came to the false Putin propaganda that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 election, Trump chose to reject the truth as told to him by all of his intelligence experts and instead, believe what Rudy Giuliani was telling him. Why? Because people like FBI Director Christopher Wray were offering him information that was in the country’s interest, Schiff said, while Giuliani was offering him information that was in Trump’s personal and political interest. With Trump, the latter will win out every time, Schiff said, and that makes him dangerous. In closing, Schiff said:
If right doesn’t matter, it doesn’t matter how good the Constitution is. It doesn’t matter how brilliant the framers were. It doesn’t matter how good or bad our advocacy in this trial is. It doesn’t matter how well-written the oath of impartiality is. If right doesn’t matter, we’re lost. If the truth doesn’t matter, we’re lost. The framers couldn’t protect us from ourselves if right and truth don’t matter.
Here, right is supposed to matter. It’s what’s made us the greatest nation on earth. No Constitution can protect us if right doesn’t matter anymore.
You know you can’t trust this president to do what’s right for this country. You can trust he will do what’s right for Donald Trump. He’ll do it now. He’s done it before. He’ll do it for the next several months. He’ll do it in the election if he’s allowed to. This is why if you find him guilty, you must find that he should be removed. Because right matters. Because right matters, and the truth matters. Otherwise, we are lost.
Here’s a 9-minute clip of Schiff’s statement, or follow the trending Twitter hashtag #RightMatters.
Today, the House managers will make the case that Trump obstructed Congress,arguing that if Trump’s refusal to comply with every congressional request is allowed to stand, then Congress will have enabled him and all future presidents to hide their wrongdoing, effectively killing Congress’ constitutionally mandated duty to hold the executive branch accountable.
Their arguments come as the Republicans are touting a new reason not to find Trump guilty: That he’s just going to assert executive privilege anyway, and it will be dragged out in the courts, so why bother? They point to the fact that the House didn’t go to court (it actually did on several matters, and those matters are still tied up), but they are willfully ignoring history: During the Richard Nixon investigation, the House didn’t go to court to compel Nixon to turn over more information (he turned over many), but the Senate did. The difference? Those Senate Republicans wanted the truth; these Senate Republicans don’t.
Remember: In the entire history of the United States, no president has ever ordered the complete defiance of an impeachment inquiry.
What is stunning is how assiduously the Republicans are avoiding the simple question: Do you believe the accusations against Trump? Instead they’re whining about having to sit so long, they’re complaining that the Democrats have been repetitive, and they’re pouting that the House didn’t go to court. Yoo-hoo … do you think he’s guilty or not? Crickets.
The GOP begins its arguments tomorrow, and Trump’s lawyers have indicated that they likely won’t use their full 24 hours. The Republicans could vote to acquit Trump by the end of next week.
Meanwhile, a reprehensible spectacle unfolded on Twitter when GOP Senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee attacked Vindman, the veteran who has shrapnel in the body and a Purple Heart on his chest. With no evidence, she decided to accuse him of leaking information about Trump’s fateful phone call with the president of Ukraine to the whistleblower. And she called him unpatriotic.
How sad. How vulgar. To see a US senator grovel like this for Trump’s approval shows just how far the Republican Party has fallen. As anchor Jake Tapper put it on CNN: There’s no reward for decency in Trump’s Republican Party. There’s only reward for indecency.

Republican Integrity
1854-1961
R.I.P.
LikeLike
U.S.A democracy
1776 – 2020
R.I.P.
LikeLike
Shouldn’t the dates be 1776 – 2016?
If Trump triumphs and ends up elected for a second term at the end of this year, then when he lied the first time he took the Constitutional Oath of office in January 2017, that was the end of our Constitutional Republic. Since then, Trump and his GOP enablers have been working overtime to accomplish a not so stealthy coup.
Again, if Trump triumphs in 2020 and beyond, the only way to reclaim the Constitutional Republic will be with another bloody Civil War.
LikeLike
I am very reluctant to go withy our thinking her, Lloyd, and yet, I will have to lean heavily in your direction. Unfortunately, enough pain might give Americans the society they want but more that they need.
I shudder at what you suggest but you are not wildly out there in your hypothesis at all.
LikeLike
As long as neo-liberals, neo-conservatives, extremist faux evangelicals, and libertarians embedded in both major parties hold on to enough power to block state and federal legislation, the journey to return American to progressive reforms is not going to get off the ground.
LikeLike
Cx: . . . to go with your thinking here. . . . .
LikeLike
Let me take this opportunity to vent. 🙂 I’ve watched most of this “trial.” I think Adam Schiff is absolutely brilliant. He has risen to the occasion. He has bullets in his gun (as my mom, a lawyer, used to say) and is hitting his target with every single one. He and the other managers are telling a story using facts and forceful argument supported by law, evidence and appeal to the values, morals and spirit that are the underpinnings of our country (and hopefully still are). Their presentation has been cogent, organized, and rousing at times. I find it outrageous that we have senators who are using fidget spinners, drawing, reading books, running to the cloakroom to check their phones etc. The Chief Justice called the senate the “world’s greatest deliberative body.” Really? My 7th graders fidget with their fingers and play with objects in class. In no court room in this country would a judge allow such behavior by jurors. Whether this is affectation, sincere lack of interest, etc., I think it’s inappropriate for members of “the world’s greatest deliberative body.” I also wish we could dispense with this kind of exaggeration. I also find the “prayer” before the trial to be completely inappropriate. Whose “Lord” are we praying to? What about people who don’t have a “Lord.” But that’s another matter. Finally, perhaps a legal scholar out there can answer a question for me. Why did Roberts allow senators to privately see Jennifer Williams’ classified notes concerning the Pence phone call? If he can do this for that document, why can he NOT do it for other documents. Or can he? And why did he decide on this one specific document? This is an issue that hasn’t been clearly explained by the press. Thanks!
LikeLike
Well vented!
LikeLike
The Senators agreed to the sharing of this one document. Lord knows why. But they have refused to declassify it.
LikeLike
Well we are exposing a lot of myths about the American experience. Neither the Courts nor the Congress has ever been above politics.They have always been a vehicle of power. Politics by definition is how we decide ” who gets what when and how”
That perhaps is Trumps greatest crime. All these heinous forces were there long before he arrived on the scene, he has made it acceptable for them to come out. The left always out of power, has tried for decades to expose the myths as a vehicle toward progressive change.
Trump has raised their hate to a badge of honor.
Yes the courts are political and always have been.
LikeLike
The polls, as reported by FiveThirtyEight and Real Clear Politics show that Trump has been underwater by about 9 percent from day one.
In 2016, 138 million Americans voted. 9 percent of that is almost 13 million votes, five times the popular vote Trump lost to Hillary.
FiveThirtyEight compares Trump’s popularity to every president starting with Harry Truman in 1945, and Donald Trump is the most unpopular president of them all. Trump has never been above 50 percent. He has always been below it.
And, in 2020, it looks like more Americans are going to vote and that means the gap could be wider by millions more. Trump’s voters are pretty much set. I do not think his numbers will change much. Most of the new voters will turn out to vote against Trump.
After four years of Trump’s lies, tweetstorms and hate rallies, I do not think there is much the Russians or anyone else can do to stop most voters from voting like the Russians did in 2016.
Fool me once in 2016 shame on you.
Fool me twice in 2020, shame on me.
LikeLike
I pray for a Blue Tidal Wave
LikeLike
When the blue wave hits in 2020, I expect it to be bigger than 2018.
The GOP will lose more states and hopefully its majority in the Senate.
Then we will see Republican majorities in states that lost their grip passing all kinds of legislation to strip as much power from Democrats as possible before they take over in January 2021.
LikeLike
We are at a pivot point, in a phase transition. This next election is critical.
LikeLike
It sure does not look like a blue wave here. Marsha Blackburn, soon to be our most senior senator, was quoted on his very page attacking Vindman. She did this because she understands the political lay of the land. Soon re-districting will dilute the voting block that is Nashville, and we will have no representation of anyone but the candadite of suburban choice.
LikeLike
Everybody knows. Trump is pathetically insecure, a lout, a moron, a pathological liar, clinically an exhibitionist narcissist, a serial sexual predator, a ne’er-do-well would-be playboy and business failure, a con man, a criminal money launderer for Russian mobsters, a Russian asset and dependable water-carrier for the kleptocratic Russian state, a traitor to his country.
EVERYBODY KNOWS. You and I know it. Every reporter knows it. The Republican Senators know it. The toadies in the Trump Misadministration know it. His lawyers know it. The Evangelical leaders know it (most of them; there are some real dummies). The U.S. intelligence services know it. All our allies know it. Melania knows it. Trump and his spawn know it. Yes, sure, there are some rubes out there in the hinterlands who don’t. But everyone else? They ALL know. He’s useful to the corrupt politicians gathered around him. This is how bad it’s gotten. Ghouliani cooked up a scheme–nail the Bidens, and sold his dim-witted client on it. And he got caught. But hey, nothing a Sharpie won’t cure in an time when our leadership, at the highest levels, is a corrupt criminal enterprise.
Dark times. This is what a country that has lost its moorings looks like, one that is on its way to becoming either a fascist dictatorship or a failed state. It’s the cronies gathered around Stalin in the Kuntsevo Dacha. It’s John Gotti and the boys at the Ravenite. It’s Rome in the time of Commodus. It’s a sick joke. And everybody knows.
And the “trial”? Well, what Trump did was bad. Very, very bad. Impeachably bad. Removal from office bad. Putting his personal political gain above the country’s national security, above the needs of a desperate ally at war. Unforgiveable. But that’s tiny compared to the whole picture, isn’t it? It’s as though the Son of Sam were being tried for traffic violations. But here we are. And even for this, he will go completely free. To do it again. And again. And again. Trump emboldened. Jabba theTrump off the chain.
LikeLike
The same thing happened to the Roman Republic when the Roman Senate gave away the republic to the first all-powerful Emperor … until 71 emperors from Augustus to Theodosius and the Roman Empire vanished forever.
LikeLike
The irony is that the Roman senate met for a thousand years after Rome fell. All through the Middle Ages, Europeans thought of themselves as Romans
LikeLike
Even in England south of Hadrian’s Wall.
LikeLike
Rudolph the Brown-Nosed | Bob Shepherd
Posted on December 28, 2019
(to the tune of “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer”)
Rudolph the Ghouliani
had a very brown, brown nose,
squandered his former goodwill,
stroking Trump on TV shows.
All of the other Trumpties
used to laugh and call him names.
Even those abject toadies
thought him crooked and insane.
Then one Foggy Bottom eve,
Trumpty called to say,
“Rude one with your nose so brown,
won’t you take Joe Biden down?”
What happened then’s sheer folly:
thanks to lows the two men reached,
history will most remember that
Trumpty Dumpty was impeached.
LikeLike
Dem leader calls McConnell’s bluff on Hunter Biden: ‘They have 53 votes’ but are afraid to call him
January 24, 2020
…Schumer told MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” that many of his GOP colleagues are hearing the impeachment evidence for the first time, because they rely on Fox News for their information.
“This is the first time probably a majority of Republicans have heard the whole case start to finish,” he said. “They’ve heard bits and pieces. Many of them hear it on Fox News, and we know what Fox News does. They leave out the most damning parts against the president, and they even distort some of them.”
But he remains hopeful that GOP senators will vote to allow additional evidence, after hearing what the House had already turned up against the president…
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/dem-leader-calls-mcconnells-bluff-on-hunter-biden-they-have-53-votes-but-are-afraid-to-call-him/
LikeLike
I’ve listened to almost all of this sham “trial” so far. But I don’t know if I shall have the stomach for the coming Days of the Sycophants. Farce is supposed to be funny. You know, “She Stoops to Conquer” or “Noises Off” funny.
LikeLike
This sounds like more than just ‘firing’ Yovanovitch. Trump said, “Get rid of her.” and “Take her out.” has a very definite meaning. She was warned to leave the country for her own security.
……………………….
Lev Parnas Says He Has Tape of Trump Calling for Ambassador’s Firing
Jan. 24, 2020
The former associate of Rudolph W. Giuliani said through his lawyer that he had given the tape to the House Intelligence Committee for use in the impeachment inquiry.
Democrats argued on Friday that the recording bolsters their argument that there may be relevant evidence that has yet to be considered.
ABC reported that Mr. Trump could be heard on the tape saying, “Get rid of her.” According to ABC, the president went on to say: “Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. O.K.? Do it.”…
LikeLike
But if there is one word that sums up Trump best, I think, it is this.
Trump is a vandal.
LikeLike
Here are the mushed up ‘facts’ from the WH:
The White House • January 24, 2020
The dishonest impeachment case
Today marks the end of House Democrats’ 3-day presentation of their historically weak Articles of Impeachment against President Trump. Starting tomorrow, the President will have a chance to respond to Democrats’ dishonest case.
As expected, the media is going the extra mile to prop up Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) performance this week. Their hope, much like Schiff’s argument itself, is that if you repeat a lie enough, people might soon forget you don’t have any actual evidence for it.
MUST WATCH: Caught! ABC anchor tries to cut off the President’s counsel
That strategy was on full display in today’s finale. Schiff spent long portions of his presentation lecturing Senators on the importance of U.S. security aid to Ukraine, claiming that President Trump undermined it. The truth, of course, is that President Trump is the one who secured that lethal defense aid for Ukraine in the first place, reversing the Obama Administration’s policy of weak support.
It gets better. Guess who voted against authorizing the assistance for Ukraine? House Democrats’ own impeachment managers. Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) voted no on the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included $300 million for Ukraine. Nadler joined Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) in voting against the FY2019 NDAA, as well, with its $250 million for Ukraine.
Unfortunately, this behavior is par for the course for Democrats in Washington lately. Their obsession with attacking President Trump has led to all sorts of outright lies over the past 3 years, many of which the media simply declined to fact-check:
Beginning in 2017, Schiff lied multiple times that he had seen evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia. Of course, the Mueller Report exposed that as a leftwing hoax—so Schiff just moved on to Ukraine.
Also in 2017, Schiff tried to repeatedly mislead the public on the credibility of the debunked Steele dossier. In 2018, he issued a memo to Republicans stating that the FBI and Justice Department didn’t abuse the surveillance process to spy on the Trump campaign. That is now a proven falsehood.
Chasing another hoax, Schiff tried to obtain compromising photos of the President that never even existed. He was duped by Russian pranksters.
It was discovered that Schiff’s team coordinated with the whistleblower at the center of the Ukraine allegations before the complaint was ever even filed. Schiff had previously lied that there was no contact with the whistleblower.
That’s just a small sample of some of the worst lies from one Democrat impeachment manager. But no matter how many things they make up, the facts of the case won’t change: President Trump is not accused of a corrupt action or of breaking the law. He is under attack by avowed political enemies on the subjective basis of motive and intent because they disagree with his policies.
Think about that as a precedent.
“‘Dazzling’: Adam Schiff’s history of inaccuracies, conspiracy theories follows him to Senate floor”
Shameless: “Adam Schiff Refers to Russia Over 30 Times During Senate Impeachment Hearing”
What President Trump told the 47th March for Life
President Trump made history today, becoming the first President to join thousands of Americans at the annual March for Life rally in Washington. Here are a few important things he told the crowd:
When it comes to abortion, Democrats have embraced the most radical and extreme positions.
Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House.
Every life brings love into this world. Every child brings joy to a family. Every person is worth protecting.
Young people are the heart of the March for Life—and it is your generation that is making America a Pro-Family, Pro-Life Nation!
READ: Thousands of Americans are marching to defend the unborn—and the President stands with them.
Pro-life Americans: President Trump “has pursued policies we’ve dreamt of”
Photo of the Day
Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian
President Trump delivers remarks at the 47th Annual March for Life gathering | January 24, 2020
Privacy Policy | Contact the White House | Unsubscribe
The White House · 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW · Washington, DC 20500 · USA · 202-456-1111
LikeLike
I posted this previously but will do so again
this was sent to newspapers, put on facebook.
I would urge others to also write and do whatever you can to oppose the disaster that is happening.
The assault on truth is probably the largest problem we have. Many former journalists sought truth in reporting. One, Jim Lehrer who just died was a prime example. Integrity in reporting was paramount.
Thus my letter to our Indiana Senators, from whom I received the unasked for form letter. Obviously they read it very carefully. These are MY concerns.
Concerning the Senate trial of Donald Trump:
In a legitimate trial the seeking for the truth is the ABSOLUTE bottom line, the raison d’être
1. Is the search for truth the bottom line for this trial? Is a complete line of all relevant witnesses and documents to be sought and examined? Or; “Don’t confuse me with facts. My mind is already made up?
“Truth, the first victim of tyranny.”
2. Is the office of the presidency to become a dictatorship where a president is able to stifle any inquiry to legitimate concerns about his actions?
3. Has the search for ultimate good, truth, and beauty succumbed to lies?
How many lies has this president put forth in the years he has been president?
4. Does the Republican party stand for truth or to protect their party, protect that kind of a leader? Is this the kind of morality and change of the long philosophical search for ultimate good, truth, and beauty which Republicans wish to pass on to their children?
5. Are there ANY statesmen left to stand for truth or only politicians protecting their posteriors?
GREAT question.
Please do not send me a form letter in response. I have seen and read the BOGUS Republican responses already. TRUTH or lies and ignorance?
LikeLike
Thank you very much for your letter, Mr. Wilder. Rest assured that Senator Grifter takes your concerns very seriously and is working every day for the benefit of constituents just like you. In this grave matter, it is precisely the concerns of hard-wording, dedicated Americans like you that guide the decisions he makes, every day, for the benefit of our state and of this great nation. And so, he extends to you, from the bottom of his heart, thanks for your concerns and for your commitment to the values we all cherish. And be sure to attend our virtual town hall, where your voice is always heard!
La de dah dah, tra la la, blah blah blah boom de a!
LikeLike
Bob Shepherd: You nailed it. Gordon Wilder and I write to the same Senators.
I’ve now contacted Senator Mike Braun [R-IN] three times in the last three days. I’m sure what I wrote was read with true intent to ‘be of service’ to me. [BS] I keep asking why the GOP Senators and Trump refuse to allow knowledgeable people to testify. Surely Trump wants to be exonerated by those who know what has happened. Braun doesn’t answer.
………………………………….
“Instead of working on issues that the American people care about, like healthcare reform and infrastructure, the Democrats have instead decided to continue harassing the Trump Administration with flimsy and unsubstantiated claims.
Sincerely,
Mike Braun
U.S. Senator
LikeLike
Here is more of Senator Mike Braun’s letter. I wrote and told him that I didn’t trust what he had to say.
…..
On January 16, 2020, the impeachment trial began in the Senate with the swearing in of Chief Justice John Roberts. As a United States Senator, I am now tasked with evaluating the charges against President Donald Trump. The Constitution of the United States, which I took an oath to uphold, requires removal from office should the President be impeached and convicted of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
LikeLike
Gordon, I did not mean by that post to be dismissive of your beautiful letter. It’s extremely important that people write these and call. While these grifters don’t pay attention to their specific content, they do hire people to tick off yes or no on various lists of issues, and the results, there weigh heavily in their actual decision making. So, thank you for being someone who give a darn.
LikeLike
gives*
LikeLike
Trump is a vandal.
Let me explain. He vandalizes the environment. He vandalizes our relations with allies. He vandalizes his personal relationships and professional relationships with his own staff and with everyone else he comes in contact with. He vandalizes political norms. He vandalizes the lives of the poor and unfortunate. He vandalizes agencies and departments that are supposed to work for the common good so that they no longer function to do what they are supposed to do. He vandalizes our international reputation. He vandalizes the Constitution. He vandalizes our economic system. He vandalizes treaties. He vandalizes schools. He vandalizes the very language that we speak. He vandalizes legal precedents. He is a vandal. He runs roughshod over and destroys everything he touches. He leaves it a mess, a wreck.
That’s why Putin wanted him in this position. Trump is the monkey wrench thrown into the U.S. socio-politico-military-economic machine.
LikeLike
Recall that the Vandals came into Rome because of the entrenched corruption in that empire. I bet they really were not so bad. Fake news?
LikeLike
True. Bu WE (our congress, his supporters, his colleagues) ALLOW it. I’m often reminded of a child who has been enabled and has now turned into an unruly monster. That’s what Trump is. But it’s worse because he’s an adult who is now president. “WE” ALLOW IT. What if we did not allow it? I’m often reminded of V in V for Vendetta. Who’s to blame? You need only look into a mirror.
LikeLike
Mamie Krupczak Allegretti: This comes from the ACLU:
But the White House’s legal justification for Trump’s Ukraine aid machinations is a new, potentially more far-reaching and alarming twist. Depending on the details of the White House’s legal analysis, which has not been officially confirmed or disclosed, such an extraordinarily broad power grab set as precedent could gut the separation of powers and upend our constitutional order. A maximalist version could even foreclose Congress’s ability to check presidential overreach and fulfill basic duties involving matters of war and peace, including conducting oversight through appropriations laws and establishing spending priorities. What Congress enacted wouldn’t matter under the worst-case scenario because the president could unilaterally ignore or nullify it. It’s an especially galling argument with respect to military funding, as the Constitution explicitly allocates that authority to Congress.
LikeLike
I’m often reminded of Abraham Lincoln who said, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
LikeLike
I LOVE Borowitz.
…………………………..
The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, “The Borowitz Report.”
Trump Defense Team Scrambling to Find Example of Law Trump Did Not Break
By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker
24 January 20
Desperately trying to change the narrative after a week of damaging presentations, Donald J. Trump’s defense team is scrambling to find an example of one law that Trump did not break, sources confirmed on Friday.
In concert with two of Jeffrey Epstein’s most prominent defenders, Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr, Trump’s personal attorney Jay Sekulow has been scouring federal, state, and municipal law books in the hopes of finding one statute that Trump, for whatever reason, did not violate.
“So far, no luck,” a source close to the defense team said.
If the attorneys do manage to find a law that Trump did not break, that information will be “locked down” in a secure server to which Trump himself will not have access.
“They’re trying to prevent the worst-case scenario, where Trump discovers there’s a law he hasn’t broken yet and immediately goes and breaks it,” the source said.
As the pressure on the defense team mounts, Dershowitz has privately expressed regret that he got involved with Trump’s case.
“O.J. was easier than this,” he was overheard muttering.
LikeLike
Democrats should make lots of noise about Dershowitz, Trump, Epstein. Dershowitz will be using the same logic to defend Trump as he used when he defended himself for joining President Trump’s impeachment defense team despite his connection to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
“Well look, I also defended O.J. Simpson and Claus von Bulow,” Dershowitz said Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union when pressed about his connection to Epstein. “I have defended some of the most controversial people in American history.”
This might even be something to cheer about by the some men on Trump’s base…..but as details are discovered, women will notice, and “Dershowitz, Trump, Epstein” will have a lasting impact……even upon women in red states.
LikeLike
These guys have been so emboldened. Trump gets a kick out of rubbing people’s noses in his dirt, I think. “I know! I’ll hire my old Epstein party buddies as lawyers.”
Sick
LikeLike
Nicholas Kristof: What if Trump were simply a high school vice principal who ushered a police detective’s son into advanced placement classes, but then said, “I’d like you to do us a favor though.” The favor would be for the detective to investigate the vice principal’s ex-wife in the run-up to a child custody hearing. Wouldn’t we all recognize that as an abuse of power that should lead the vice principal to be fired?
LikeLike
This video comes from a man in Indiana!! I’m sure this video did not show Daniel Deitrich singing because he would find his life in danger. What a ‘Christian’ nation that supports children in cages and sexual assault on women.
…………………………
‘Powerful’: Evangelical Christian’s song about the betrayal he feels from religious Trump support goes viral
Daniel Deitrich is a Christian worship leader in South Bend, Indiana. As discussed in this article for Religious News Service, such worship leaders are among the 81% of evangelical Christians who voted for Donald Trump in 2016.
Four years ago Dietrich formed the South Bend City Church, which he describes as “[A] Jesus-centered community for believers and doubters and everyone in between. It’s a place where spiritual exiles have found a home, a place where you don’t have to check your brain at the door, and it’s been so beautiful to see people who have been excluded from or wounded by the church feel safe and seen and loved.”
Daniel Deitrich’s hymn is both a love song to the church and a call to repentance, which castigates the Trump administration for “putting kids in cages, ripping mothers from their babies,” but blames the church for failing to rein them in: “I looked to you to speak on their behalf/But all I heard was silence/Or worse you justify it.” It is also a warning to the church: “You weaponized religion and you wonder why I’m leaving to find Jesus on the wrong side of your walls …
”Hymn for the 81%
Jan 12, 2020
In 2016, 81% of white evangelical Christians voted for Donald Trump after (among other things) hearing an audio recording of him bragging about sexually assaulting women.
LikeLike
Trump never learns, never reads and knows that he is never guilty of doing anything wrong. I wrote a letter to Braun [R-IN] to thank him for letting the nation know on Meet the Press, that Trump needs to change his behavior.
……………………
GOP Senator Mike Braun says impeachment trial will hopefully serve as warning to Trump, future presidents
…Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) said Sunday he believes that impeachment will push President Trump to change his future behavior even if he is acquitted in the Senate.
“This ought to be instructive for anyone here, that if you’re pushing the envelope or doing things that may not feel right, let alone be right, you better be careful, because we’re in that kind of atmosphere right now,” Braun said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”…
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/479969-gop-senator-says-impeachment-trial-will-hopefully-serve-as-warning-to-trump
LikeLike
Former U.S. Congressman Charles Djou (Hawaii) penned an open letter announcing he is resigning from the Republican party over their embrace of Donald Trump and his harmful anti-immigration platform, which has been embraced by the Republican party itself at this point.
In a lengthy open letter on Honolulu Civic Beat, Djou lays out his reasons for leaving the Republican National Party.Today, after much consideration, I abandon my party because I am unwilling to abandon my principles. I can no longer stand with a Republican Party that is led by a man I firmly believe is taking the party of Lincoln in a direction I fundamentally disagree with, and a party that is unwilling to stand up to him. It disturbs me that the Republican Party under President Donald Trump is now defined as a party hostile to immigration. We are the leader of the free world, not because we are great (or need to be great again), but because we are good.
[…]Civility is an inner trait of true character. Trump’s belittling of Sen. Jeff Flake and immature name-calling of Sen. Bob Corker reflect a weakness of character. Trump’s penchant for conspiracy theories, such as his assertion that Sen. Ted Cruz’s father was involved in the assassination of JFK, is disturbing. His poorly constructed stream-of-consciousness tweets are not only immature, but provide real harm to the stability of our democracy.As President George W. Bush recently lamented, “Bullying and prejudice in our public life sets a national tone, provides permission for cruelty and bigotry, and compromises the moral education of children. The only way to pass along civic values is to first live up to them.”
But I am most disappointed by the failure of the GOP to clearly and consistently condemn Trump’s childish behavior. Sadly today, too many Republicans either applaud Trump’s tirades or greet them with silent acceptance. This leads to an implicit ratification by the GOP of Trump’s undisciplined, uninformed, and unfocused leadership as a core part of the Republican Party. This is something I cannot accept and will not be a part of.
LikeLike
The man/baby is crying again. He never does anything wrong. Isn’t it amazing that the only people telling the truth are quivering sycophants?
…..
“I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, including the Bidens,” Trump wrote. “In fact, he never complained about this at the time of his very public termination. If John Bolton said this, it was only to sell a book.”
CNN reports the Bolton book, The Room Where It Happened, is due out on March 17. Following confirmation of the book’s release, congressional Democrats renewed calls for the former national security adviser to testify in the impeachment trial.
LikeLike
There is hope:
Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, told a closed-door meeting of Republicans that he did not currently have the votes to block Democrats from calling witnesses at the trial. Still, he and his leadership team are optimistic they will to end up with the votes they need by the end of the week.
LikeLike