Paul Waldman of the Washington Post went down memory lane with prominent Republicans who called out Trump as a phony before he was elected.
In other words, it was a typical morning in the Trump era. As Republicans buckle down to defend him in the next phase of the impeachment process, they have made clear that there is almost no malfeasance on Trump’s part they will not countenance and no betrayal of his office they will not excuse.
What makes their own moral complicity even more profound is that this didn’t come as some sort of surprise.
It’s not as though Republicans suddenly found themselves with a president who turned out to be mentally unbalanced, as petty and vindictive as a 5-year-old, and more corrupt than anyone who has occupied his office. They knew exactly who he was.
Not only that, a great many of them tried to warn the country and their own party that if Trump became president, it would be a disaster.
They were right. Yet today, the best that can be said of nearly any of them (with an exception or two) is that they try to remain silent in the face of Trump’s misdeeds, ducking into elevators to avoid answering questions about the president they support. And some have become his most passionate defenders, eagerly explaining why the very pathologies they warned about are in fact strengths, and that the man they described as a monster is in fact a hero.
Let’s remind ourselves of what they said back in 2016 when Trump was in the process of seizing control of their party:
- “He’s a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot. He doesn’t represent my party. He doesn’t represent the values that the men and women in uniform are fighting for,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham in December 2015. In another interview, Graham said, “I think he’s a kook. I think he’s crazy. I think he’s unfit for office.” Graham has now become one of Trump’s most ardent advocates.
- “This man is a pathological liar, he doesn’t know the difference between truth and lies,” said Sen. Ted Cruz in May 2016, adding that “the man is utterly immoral” and “a narcissist at a level I don’t think this country’s ever seen.” Cruz now insists that Trump did nothing illegal with regard to Ukraine and says of the impeachment inquiry, “Washington is always a circus, but this is three rings with all the clowns and it’s nuts right now.”
- “Yes, I am supporting Donald Trump, but I’m doing so despite the fact that I think he’s a terrible human being,” said Mick Mulvaney in November 2016. He now serves as Trump’s acting chief of staff.
- “He offers a barking carnival act that can be best described as Trumpism: a toxic mix of demagoguery, mean-spiritedness and nonsense that will lead the Republican Party to perdition if pursued,” said Rick Perry in July 2015. “Trump’s candidacy is a cancer on conservatism, and it must be clearly diagnosed, excised and discarded.” Perry became Trump’s secretary of energy, then was tasked to implement Trump’s corrupt Ukraine policy as one of the “three amigos.”
- “During anxious times, it can be tempting to follow the siren call of the angriest voices,” said then-governor Nikki Haley in February 2016 in a reference to Trump, adding that he was “everything a governor doesn’t want in a president.” Haley became his ambassador to the U.N., and now says of Trump that he’s “truthful” and “great to work with.”
They still think he’s a charlatan and a kook (and an idiot and a racist and a traitor and a criminal and so on), but they see him as a USEFUL one. With a guy like this playing part-time president on TV, they can loot, to their heart’s content, in service to themselves and to their oligarchical overlords.
Particularly the Charles Koch tribe,
It is disheartening that so many republicans are opportunistic cowards.
During the campaign, the media ignored those contradictions because they don’t believe it is their job to ever ask a Republican politician about the contradictions between what they say, and what is true or what they have said in the past.
The supposedly NY Times believes its job is simply to report the praise that Republicans give to Trump and contrast that with what a “Democrat critic charges”, giving both sides equal weight because the job of NY Times reporters is not to inform readers but present fact and fiction as two equally valid positions.
We have entered an Orwellian era where Republicans can say “we have always been at war with Eastasia” and the media will dutifully report that, and when 3 months later Republicans say “we have always been the closest of allies with Eastasia” the media will dutifully report that 99%, and 1% of the time include a disclaimer that says “Democratic critics claim we have no always been the closest of allies with Eastasia” .
Scary times.
Exactly. Orwell was just off by a few years. https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2019/03/17/my-candidate-for-the-most-important-book-you-could-ever-read/
This could not happen with a complicit media — and I’m talking about you, NY Times.
I have read multiple articles since the end of the impeachment hearings last week that quote Republicans spouting complete nonsense without the reporter giving any context. And those were in the so-called “left wing” NY Times. And clips on the so-called “left wing” MSNBC.
This kind of propaganda needs a compliant and complicit media and that is what they have in this country right now.
(One of the most annoying of those clips was Trump being allowed to characterize Rudy Giuliani as an honest and upright corruption fighter. No mention of the fact that Giuliani’s tenure as Mayor was full of corruption that he was covering up, not fighting. His own handpicked police commissioner went to jail. But you would not know it because Republicans are allowed to characterize Giuliani and Barr as upright and honest without any debunking of those false claims.)
Bob Shepherd, did you know that the Judge that just ordered McGahn to testify quoted Orwell in a footnote? I just read the excerpt at DailyKos:
“Meanwhile, says DOJ, the President has the authority to make unilateral determinations regarding whether he and his senior-level aides (both current and former) will respond to, or defy, the subpoenas that authorized House committees issue during constitutionally authorized investigations of potential wrongdoing within his administration. […] [11]
— pg 38-39
That is soooooooo awesome!!! Thanks, NYC parent!!!
You are welcome! And note that the Orwellian footnote is regarding the legal “reasoning” set out by the reprehensible William Barr, who the media treats as some brilliant legal mind instead of the mediocre right wing hack he has always been.
Wow. Thanks for that heads up NYCPCP. Just sent to my former Con Law professor. I used this book in my high school government class in the late 80s.
“Why shouldn’t I root for Russia? Which I am.” That’s a quote from Tucker Carlson in response to a guest advocating for Ukrainian democracy. Forty-five minutes later after twitter lit up, Carlson walked back his allegiance.
Spell that first name with an F.
Bob! 🙂
Ugh, Tucker Carlson and his semi-clone Rich Lowry, they make my skin crawl. These 2 right wing hacks (among a plethora of wing nuts) spread more disinformation, lies, obfuscation, mealy-mouthed propaganda than a crazed parrot on methamphetamines. Lowry is hawking his latest book, “The Case for Nationalism.” Just what we don’t need, advocacy for jingoism, mindless flag waving, chauvinism, rabid faux patriotism and bible thumping.
Tucker went to private schools that have Episcopalian links. He’s an Episcopalian and says he abhors the liberals who run the denomination. His family put the “d” in dysfunction. (Wikipedia)
In my home state there are two so-called moderates, Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker. Corker criticized Trump and made way for a trump clone in female image. Alexander helped confirm Betsy DeVos. Now out of office. Corker is silent and Alexander votes lockstep with Mitch and the Spineless. Who knew that our moderate tradition would become a prop for this man, who has gutted environmental legislation, turned a good portion of the world against us, and assured with his tax cut that there will be almost no policy flexibility when the next economic downturn occurs.
I am very sad about Lamar Alexander. He knows better.
Just out of college I took a job working in different towns. I recall seeing a marquee pronouncing the cancelation of Alexander’s speech in Jackson, TN because he had to be sworn in early. His predecessor had been selling pardons to prisoners.
This experience should have sealed in his heart the need for honesty in government. He should have campaigned for Hillary. He should come out and support impeachment. He has nothing to lose at this point in his career. But he remains silent. His career ladder program was a failure in TN education, but he persists in supporting other failed attempts just like both sides of the asile have done for so long. He has been cooped by the right wing.
Let’s see, I think there is a term for this…what is it again?
Oh, yes: moral and ethical blindness.
The prevailing ethos of Republicans is. “Anything goes in the service of wealth and power.” That is coupled with a decades-long push to promote a “no one is on my side, so I must be out for myself” popular culture. That won’t change. It is up to Democrats and mass movements to offer a different ethos, “An injury to one is an injury to all,” and “we sink or swim together.” That means ending with Democrats embrace of deregulation and privatization and re-embrace of integration, working-class solidarity, and government responsibility for the wellbeing of everyone–no exceptions on the altar of profitability.
Well said, Arthur!
PLEASE tell us that the DNC and every other Democrats group is ready to spend millions on BILLBOARDS, FULL PAGE ADS, candidates’ talking points with
* these quotes,
* the president’s actual contradictory quotes (can’t be fake if he said it)
* documented lies
and his Greatest Hits:
* “good on both sides” of racist acts;
* everything he said about McCain
* “… and they let you do it…”
* his inexplicable fear (it’s gotta be a connection to Putin) of his tax forms, and others)
AND in every ad have big empty spaces of what the GOP senators and reps said. “The president said/did this; Senator ____ said/did nothing”
A huge percentage of the voters believe Obama was horrible…because he was black, had a high iq and was a reasonably good president. Trump…..is not black……and no matter what he does, they will stick to the priniciple that he is no worse than Obama was. It is a national mental illness.