Jamie Gass writes here about a powerful literary tradition that was honored in Massachusetts and perhaps a few other places, but was tossed aside by the state when it adopted the Common Core.
Gass illogically puts the blame on “educrats” and schools of education for the decision that junked the state’s reverence for literature: the political decision by its governors to pursue Race to the Top funding and endorse the Common Core. The blame lies with the Gates Foundation, which funded the federally mandated, content-free Common Core. Then with the authors of the Core, who took upon themselves the task of writing national standards. And then, of course, the elected officials of both parties who put money above principle.
Gass writes:
The Bay State, with English standards that were rich in classic literature and high-quality vocabulary, outperformed every other state between 2005 and 2017 on the reading portion of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), “the nation’s report card.”
When Deval Patrick and Charlie Baker studied English at Harvard, its revered professor W. Jackson Bate won the 1978 National Book Award and Pulitzer Prize for his Samuel Johnson biography.
Interestingly, Dr. Johnson’s Dictionarydefines “politician” as “a man of artifice; one of deep contrivance.”
In 2010, the hollowness of the Patrick administration’s sloganeering – “education is our calling card” – was revealed when they took $250 million in one-time federal grant money to abandon our proven English standards and MCAS tests in favor of inferior nationalized Common Core and PARCC testing, which cut enduring fiction by 60 percent.
The Baker administration could have easily ended Common Core’s academic mediocrity in the Bay State, but instead it followed Patrick’s example by deferring to the wishes of career state edu-crats.
Why blame state employees for decisions made by the governors of both parties, the state commissioner, and the state board?

Interesting that the folks he praises:
“Driven by bipartisan, liberal arts-centric leadership, including from Tom Birmingham, Mark Roosevelt, and Bill Weld – architects of the landmark 1993 Massachusetts Education Reform Act – the Commonwealth became the nationwide envy in K-12 schooling.”
…are now all on board with privatization and charterization of our public schools. These Pioneers are something else.
LikeLiked by 1 person
so many invasive, privatizing, dividing, segregating and lifetime labeling pioneers who keep adamantly calling themselves “liberals”
LikeLike
NEA endorses Common Core. There are many collaborators in this fiasco. Gas’s is right to spread the blame.
LikeLike
It still amazes me how they put all that effort into engineering this thing and then abandoned it.
It’s such a betrayal of all the front line people in schools who worked so hard to comply with it. I don’t know if they agreed with it or not but it was thrust upon my local public school and they worked really hard to make this ed reform fever dream a reality, only to be abandoned.
Why trust them on anything? They don’t value anyones time or effort at all. Best to just ignore them and wait 3 weeks and they’ll be chasing the next thing.
It’s exactly the same with all of it. They always promise “support” and they never, ever come through. You really have to conclude “The Common Core” was just a mechanism to put the more difficult tests in. They got the tests, used the beat schools over the head, and then they all disappeared, never to mention this “vitally important” program again.
It isn’t just a complete and utter disregard for teachers time and effort- it’s also devalues STUDENTS time and effort. They’re treated like guinea pigs. It’s as if their work has no value at all when they do their cost-benefit analysis.
LikeLike
I don’t know if my local public school is representative of all (or any) public schools but over 25 years it has been sad to watch ed reformers swoop in with whatever the new fad is and then watch what seem to be earnest and well-intentioned school employees go along with it, only to be either blindsided by political attacks on public schools or abandoned.
They treat public schools terribly and since there are students in those schools they also inevitably and always treat public school students terribly.
There’s no follow through.
I imagine it would be difficult to buck this stuff since any dissent is treated as “defending the status quo” and is presumptively treated as bad faith, but I do wish they would resist.
Don’t take the grant. It won’t come near to covering the cost anyway and you’ll be left holding the bag in a matter of months, stuck with a policy you didn’t want and now have to pay for.
LikeLike
Curriculum should be determined by educators, not politicians. Ever since NCLB imposed an impossible standard on public education, education has become a victim of politics. NCLB was an example of federal overreach, and the Common Core and RTTP continued this infamous pattern of federal meddling. Test and punish under the guise of “accountability” have stripped many of our schools of meaningful content. Teaching to a test is not a meaningful curriculum. We are overdue for a change.
I attended a high school that had high standards, and the curriculum was steeped in the classics. We read entire books by some of the world’s best writers. It was great preparation for college as I was fully prepared for the work and demands. Massachusetts understood this before outside interference in education became the norm. Unfortunately, forces outside education continue to shape policy. Tech companies are determined to impose technology on schools whether it makes sense or not. These decisions should left to teachers, not tech companies dangling cash in front of schools.
LikeLike
Exactly right. It is akin to the State Legislature and Congress telling doctors how to perform surgery. Get out of the operating room!
LikeLike
Well, you’d be right, Dianne, had those educators delivered anything close to the improvement in medicine or surgery over the last 100 years.
Yet as you yourself so well documented, educators did nothing of the kind and instead followed the fashionable nonsense of the day, from promoting self-esteem, through Whole Language and “Multiple Learning Styles,” and to today’s glorification of Common Core over common sense.
So while politicians rarely do any good in education (with a few notable exceptions such as Mass.under Weld in early 1990s or California under Pete Wilson in late 1990s) the educators and their unions are largely to blame for those educational disasters.
LikeLike
Sorry, Zeev, you are wrong. The policies you don’t like stem mostly from legislators, not teachers.
LikeLike
The self-esteem Movement in California was championed by a crackpot legislator.
LikeLike
I was teaching at the time that the crackpot legislature in California introduced a bill to the legislature to force all public schools to support faux self-esteem. The legislature voted it down.
But that isn’t where the self-esteem movement had its start.
“The results of Pastor Robert Schuller’s influence on the already century-old self-esteem movement may be discovered in Self-Esteem: Why? Why Not? from Catholic Culture.org.”
I did my homework on this one and wrote several posts on my Crazy Normal blog about the history of the self-esteem movement and teachers’ unions did not exist when that movement started. Robert Schuller and the Catholic Church were the biggest movers behind this movement and from those pulpits, the self-esteem movement spread like cancer to parents that pressured elected school boards and teachers for decades.
https://crazynormaltheclassroomexpose.com/?s=self+esteem+movement
LikeLike
The problems with healthcare in the United States are akin to education. The quality and length of life are being subverted to seek ever higher profits for wealthy corporations and individuals. Great gains were made in both arenas, but those gains are being destroyed by privateers.
LikeLike
December 3, 2018
In the era of the Republican majority (six years under Obama and the GOP still controls the Senate and the U.S. Supreme Court) and living with the insanity of Trumpistan, “U.S. Life Expectancy Drops for Third Year in a Row …
“On average, life expectancy across the globe is steadily ticking upward—but the same can’t be said for the United States. Three reports newly published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention highlight a worrying downward trend in Americans’ average life expectancy, with the country’s ongoing drug crisis and climbing suicide rates contributing to a third straight year of decline.” …
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-life-expectancy-drops-third-year-row-reflecting-rising-drug-overdose-suicide-rates-180970942/
LikeLike
Yes, Diane. State Senator Vasconcellos was the “crackpot legislator” you allude to, and teachers everywhere enthusiastically picked it up and ran with it.
But there was no Vasconcellos to pitch the Whole Language (Steve Krashen is no legislator), or the Fuzzy Math (well, perhaps Bill Honig?) or the multiple learning styles (the shameful silence of Howard Gardner comes to mind).Doesn’t matter — the teaching professionals picked all that fashionable nonsense and enthusiastically ran with it. In fact, some of them are still running with them. How professional is that?
LikeLike
Bill Honig did not invent or impose “fuzzy math.” Howard Gardner did not propose “multiple learning styles.”
Gardner wrote about “multiple intelligences,” and his theory has held up very well. Some people are gifted athletes or artists but score poorly on standardized tests.
There are in fact many kinds of intelligences. Test Taking is one. Others are also important.
LikeLike
RE: self-esteem movement: “and teachers everywhere enthusiastically picked it up and ran with it” Wurman alleged wrongly.
BS! How many teachers everywhere? Where are your links to reliable evidence?
I taught in California for thirty years 1975 – 2005 and I was teaching when the self-esteem movement came rolling down on teachers like Paton’s army in World War II, and I did not know one teacher that supported that stupidity. Some teachers caved into the pressure and inflated grades. Most teachers did not. The pressure came down from the top to make kids look good and most of the teachers I knew refused to inflate grades. We were called in one-by-one to be intimidated by administrators who were being pressured by the elected school board that was being pressured by parents that vote.
You, Wurman, are an ignorant person or a bad liar and maybe both. The people that ran with it were parents, parents who heard it from church pulpits and read about it a Catholic textbook. State Senator Vasconcellos submitted a bill to the legislature well after the self-esteem movement hit with the force of a hurricane starting with parents, to school board, to administrators, and Vasconcellos bill was voted DOWN in the legislature.
The self-esteem movement was a fad driven by parents and supported by churches. I never heard or read once that the teachers union or the teachers were the ones behind it.
LikeLike
Wurman, Iw as also teaching when the Whole Language approach hit us like another hurricane. I still remember the meeting we had where the principal of the middle school where I was teaching in the mid-1980s told us to throw out our grammar books.
The command to follow the flawed and failed theory of the Whole Language approach was forced on teachers. To make sure we complied, that principal recruited students to spy on us teachers in our classrooms to make sure we were not teaching grammar and mechanics.
Teachers hid their grammar books and taught grammar mechanics anyway. That principal made us turn in our lesson plans every Friday for the next week so he could check we weren’t planning to teach anything outside o the Whole Language approach.
Many teachers had to resort to guerrilla teaching tactics and when we were caught, we were called into the office after school and were shouted at by our principals.
LikeLike
I actually didn’t oppose Common Core. I think national standards make sense and it’s fine with me if they “raise the bar” as long as that comes along with some responsibility by the architects to raise the support.
But I was a fool. I never should have trusted people who oppose the existence of public schools to design public school policy. They reneged on the support and used the test scores to beat public schools over the head, because of course they did.
I regret allowing my son to participate in this experiment. They aren’t worthy of his trust, or his effort. They simply don’t value our schools or our students and it comes through in everything they do.
LikeLike
The Common Core may seem reasonable on the surface, but the devil is in the details. It is a tool to micro-manage public education. With high stakes that misuse data, it is a way to put public education on the defensive. It is designed to bludgeon schools into submission, and, as we know, it is a vehicle of privatization. In many cases it replaces meaningful reading, writing and reasoning.
LikeLike
The Common [sic] Core [sic] was paid for by Bill Gates. Why? He wanted a single national bullet list to which educational software could be keyed to that it could be sold “at scale.” This is how a monopolist thinks. A single set of national “standards” enables large companies to throw a lot of resources at one product and keep small entrants out of the market. In other words, it suppresses competition and innovation.
And if you think that support for the Common [sic] Core [sic] has been withdrawn, think again. Most states are still using the puerile Gates/Coleman bullet list, but under state-specific names. Why? The Oh-so-Reverend Mike Huckster-bee went to the annual ghoul convention called CPAC and told everyone that the Common [sic] Core [sic] name had become “toxic” and that they therefore go back home and CHANGE THE NAME. In other words, they should lie about what they are doing. Keep hawking the same garbage, but in new packages, and keep calling this garbage “higher standards.”
LikeLike
He wanted a single national bullet list to which educational software could be keyed to that it could be sold “at scale.” This is how a monopolist thinks.” — This is how any rational person thinks. Your problem is that you — well, we all — stuck between a bad quasi-national curriculum and presumably better local curricula. You seem unable to grasp that it is possible to have an effective federal standard in education, for example: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/68955/10.1177_002248716001100420.pdf
This country is terribly wasteful in everything: education, healthcare, electricity usage, millions of cars instead of decent public transportation, single-family homes that cover all the land that could be used for parks, etc. You are suggesting to continue wasting time and money for local… what do you call them? they are not standards, are they? programs? curricula? And why do you think it is the right choice? Why kids from Chicago need a different math program than kids from New York? And what innovation you are talking about? Aren’t we all tired of “innovation”? What exactly is happening around us every five-ten years to drastically change the school program? iPads instead of notebooks? Oy vey.
LikeLike
David Coleman was a member of the original board of Michelle Rhee’s Students First, which was created to advocate for charters, vouchers, high-stakes testing, test-based teacher evaluation, and union-bashing.
LikeLike
This is really hitting below the belt, Diane!
I don’t like David Coleman and I think he did a shitty job with Common Core Language standards (small wonder — he had zero experience or background in literacy) and one can easily demonstrate his incompetence there, or attack the devolution of the SAT under his leadership of College Board.
Yet to bring up the fact that he was a member of “the original board of Michelle Rhee’s Students First,” rather than deal with whatever he actually did or not do, is a low blow. After all, you yourself were a :Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution for quite a few years. Should that automatically disqualify you from something?
LikeLike
I recanted my role not only at the Hoover Institution but for having supported failed rightwing ideas. I did it publicly, in a book and numerous articles. I loudly said I was wrong.. Did David Coleman ever say he was wrong for having served as the treasurer of an organization that promoted privatization, Teacher-bashing, and union-busting? If he did, I never saw it.
LikeLike
If we agree that testing is primarily correlated with socioeconomic factors, can we say that performance on NAEP between 2003 and 2017 might mirror the probability a student taking the test comes from an academic sort of family?
Perhaps there was an influence related to the age of the professional teaching corp. In our state the experienced teachers began to get out of the profession as the CC stuff started in, perhaps the goal all along of the disruption gang.
In any case, the abandoning of a curriculum rich in the classics has come before this forum many times.
LikeLike
Roy, thank you for referring to the “disruption gang.” When you recognize that this is their overriding goal, then it becomes clear that they are successful in disrupting schools, families, communities and education.
LikeLike
It also really bothers me how virtually every high ranking Obama ed person has gone on to work in reform orgs. I really feel they misled voters about how completely captured that administration was and how they are all members in good standing in the echo chamber.
I’m not thrilled I was apparently paying hundreds of political appointees to work against public schools. That wasn’t what we were sold. The revolving door between government and back to ed reform lobbying is really something. It’s the same people! An insular little club of true believers. They all sound the same because they are, literally, the same people. Not a public school supporter among them. The culling process must happen at the hiring level. Non-believers can’t scale the first hurdle.
LikeLike
The current federal education policy should be described as the “Bush-Obama-Trump reforms.”
LikeLike
Jamie Gass is a balloon full of smelly, hot air (and we know where they kind of gas comes from) and soon a “just-weather” category 5 hurricane will blow Jamie away to join all the other smelly Gasbags wherever they end up after that 200 mph climate-change wind blows them away.
LikeLike
Yes, we get it that you don’t like Jamie Gass.
Do you also have anything meaningful to add, other than empty venting of your dislike? If not, I could recommend a psychiatrist.
LikeLike
And I suggest you find an institution to debug your hacked brain.
LikeLike
I rarely come here (sorry, Diane!) but what drew me was this statement:
“Gass illogically puts the blame on “educrats” and schools of education for the decision that junked the state’s reverence for literature: the political decision by its governors to pursue Race to the Top funding and endorse the Common Core. The blame lies with the Gates Foundation, which funded the federally mandated, content-free Common Core. Then with the authors of the Core, who took upon themselves the task of writing national standards. And then, of course, the elected officials of both parties who put money above principle.”
Well, you should know better, Diane. In fact, I KNOW you know better. While you are right about Bill Gates and Common Core authors, you seem to conveniently “forget” that typically governors and politicians do whatever the teacher unions and the education establishment–teachers and administrators, or “educrats” as they came to be known– tell them to do. And the AFT, and the NEA, and almost ever state department of education, and almost every teacher that spoke out at the time, were strong supported and “very excited” about having the Common Core National–oops … “State”–Standards. So it’s a small wonder that most governors followed what they were told to believe by their “educational experts” — their state ed boards, their depts of ed, their unions … and their teacher leadership.
So, at least to my knowledge–Gass correctly places a big part of the blame on those “educrats” — administrators, teacher union … and the teachers themselves. After all, there are over 5 million teachers in the country, and only some one percent supports organizations like the Badass Teacher Association (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badass_Teachers_Association) that came out against Common Core.
LikeLike
Zeev,
The decision to adopt the Common Core was made by only twostate officials: the Governor and the State Superintendent. Most states these days don’t have teachers’ unions, so don’t blame them. In most states, they are powerless. True that NEA and AFT endorsed Common Corebit how does that explain Jeb Bush’s enthusiasm for CCSS? Is Jeb under the thumb of the unions? What about all the red states, like Louisiana and Tennessee, under GOP control, that adopted CCSS? There’s plenty of blame to go around, starting with Gates (who paid for that hot mess) and Duncan (who promoted it and belittled critics) but yes, the governor’s had to go along, and most of them were Republicans. Even after opposition became too loud to ignore, Republican Governor Charlie Baker of Mass has not abandoned CCSS.
LikeLike
The decision to adopt CCSS may have been made by those two officials, but in every state their State Board of Ed later approved it. But even that doesn’t change the reality that most governors would never dare to do any major changes to education without the support of teacher unions and their Depts. of Ed. Yes, there are exceptions, but you can count those on your fingers over the last couple of decades.
Now, interestingly, you bring Jeb Bush. By the time of Common Core Jeb (like Huckabee) were not governors anymore, but wanted to maintain their “educational leaders” status, so they supported Common Core much like Bill Gates did … from Washington, not from the state capitals.
It is also interesting you bring up Louisiana. It adopted CC under the pressure of its educrats and then Bobby Jindal sued the federal government for forcing Common Core on the states. Unfortunately, he lost (idiot judge that refused even to recognize there is such a thing as a “curriculum”). But overall you are right that CC adoption was largely a bipartisan stupidity … eh, “effort.”
But you are misleading when you say that “[m]ost states these days don’t have teachers’ unions.” They do. Except that in many (most?) states belonging to the union is not mandatory anymore, so ther power has slightly weakened. Still, NEA and AFT and their state affiliates are the largest political donors in every state, as far as I know. So much for them not being to blame.
LikeLike
Jeb Bush is not simply an ex-Governor. He has controlled education policy in Florida for 20 years. He was one of the nation’s loudest champions of Common Core.
Are you suggesting that all those red state governors who endorsed Common Core were under the thumb of the teachers’ unions? They appointed the State Superintendent. They appointed the state board. But the unions in red states controlled them?
Stop wasting my time.
LikeLike
Diane,
In July 2010 when Florida adopted Common Core, Charlie Crist had been the governor for almost four years, and Jeb Bush has been out for almost four years.
In any case, that has little to do with the argument: Yes, governors and state superintendents are the people who make the adoption decision, but they rarely-rarely, not never–make such decisions against the position of their own state education bureaucracy or their state teacher unions.
Sorry if you feel I am wasting your time by correcting your simplistic description of the history.
LikeLike
Zeev,
I left the Hoover Institution. You are paid to bash public schools and teachers unions. I am not.
Why hasn’t Republican Governor Charlie Baker abolished the Common Core in Massachusetts? He controls the state board.
Jeb Bush has controlled education policy in Florida since 1998.
What about all the other red states that adopted CCSS?
Are the unions powerful there too?
You are a waste of my time.
LikeLike
I already agreed with you that “overall you are right that CC adoption was largely a bipartisan stupidity … eh, “effort.” Perhaps you missed it since you keep banging on that door.
Yes, teacher unions are powerful in both R and D states. Some more, some less, but overall powerful. And I didn’t single them out — I said that Common Core was supported at the time by governors, state legislatures, state school boards, state departments of education, and state teacher unions. And (most of) teachers too. With very few exceptions, that’s what made almost all states to adopt CC in essentially a blink of an eye. Denying this is ahistorical.
Finally, please don’t bring up the Hoover institution foolishness like that Loyd Lofthause type … it’s beneath you. The only reason I brought it up because you used some old board membership to tar David Coleman … there are so many substantive reasons to tar Coleman, there is no need to tar him by implication. I was never a Hoover fellow, I was never paid a penny by Hoover, and I am not paid by anyone to write what I think, and certainly not what I don’t think.
LikeLike
Zeev, you are listed on the Hoover website. Perhaps you might ask them to remove that.
Common Core was funded in its entirety by Bill Gates. It was endorsed by 45 states. Endorsement required only the signatures of the governor and the state superintendent. Jeb Bush was one of the most enthusiastic proponents of Common Core.
I suggest you read the books by Mercedes Schneider and Nicholas Tampico to inform yourself about the history of Common Core.
I mentioned David Coleman’s service as treasurer of Michelle Rhee’s small board of Students First not to “tar” him, as you so eloquently put it, but to state a fact he has never repudiated or apologized for. I apologized for my service on the wrong side of history. He never has. End of discussion.
LikeLike
“And (most of) teachers too. ”
That’s simply not true, that teachers welcomed CC in the beginning or ever.
LikeLike
As I recall opinion polls, teachers were willing to try Common Core. After they did, they overwhelmingly rejected it.
LikeLike
The most recent Tennessee teachers’ poll said that teachers largely supported the state’s VAM-like evaluation of teachers. None of the teachers I have talked to supported it. I have seen the poll questions, and the wording of the questions was chosen carefully so that it was impossible to express lack of support.
LikeLike
Here in Massachusetts, we do have teachers unions, and we are also widely recognized for our excellence in public education. Teachers and their unions did not climb aboard the express train for Common Core; we fought against its adoption and used our contractual bargaining agreements where possible to keep its deleterious effects from coming down on the heads of our students. The vaunted Massachusetts standards were written by actual classroom teachers when that process was begun; it was only later that it was taken out of our hands.
Deval Patrick, like his friend and former classmate, Barack Obama, a couple of charming neoliberals, were indeed conductors on the CCSS (sic) train. Charlie Baker, who succeeded Patrick, has been tied for years to the Waltons, and has also placed Walton-linked people to the state board of education he appoints, which was headed up by the late Mitchell Chester. Chester claimed there was no conflict of interest in his serving as president of PARCC while also commissioner of education. Many Massachusetts teachers would disagree.
LikeLike
Zeev: I do not know a teacher who has been asked to weigh in on a change in curriculum since back in the 1980s, if then. The “educrats” as you term them, include some complicit administrations on a state and local level, but teachers and their unions did not do this. Perhaps some signed on some of the reform measures out of a political defensive posture, but to blame the soldiers for this lost war is like suggesting that the spoiled broth is the fault of the cow. I am a teacher. Do not tell me about teachers until you have spent a majority of the last four decades in the classroom.
LikeLike
Roy,
I agree with you that the teachers were largely “soldiers” in this battle, and the “educrats” Jamie Gass refers to include mostly administrators on state and local levels.
Yet NOT only them. AFT was a vocal supporter of CC from early on, and NEA joined shortly thereafter. In fact, the AFT–well, Albert Shanker Institute, which is really same thing– published a manifesto calling for national curriculum:
“While the work before us begins with the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics, we want to stress that a quality education should also include history, geography, the sciences, civics, the arts, foreign languages, technology, health, and physical education. Standards-setting and curriculum development must be done for these as well.”
http://www.ashankerinst.org/curriculum
Check the list of signatories there to refresh you memory.
And the list of teachers who support BAT is barely 50,000 long nationally. Not a lot, given the five million teachers in the nation.
I agree that teachers are not the primary culprits here, even though they seem to have no problem to raise their voices on many issues when they don’t like the policies. Buy not here.
LikeLike
Hoover is the intellectual font of charters, vouchers, high-stakes testing, Union-bashing, evaluation of teachers by test scores. All failed ideas, hatched by ideologues in comfy offices who collect many times more in pay than teachers. But these ideologues feel no shame in telling teachers what to do and in pushing policies that demoralize teachers and drive them from their profession.
LikeLike
Surely you understand the difference between political decisions of those who have the protection of teachers as a priority (the unions) and the political decisions of those who stand to make billions from their political decisions. Teachers are not very powerful. Like Hungary in the days before World War II, we are forced to make political peace with the lesser of two evils, even though one of the evils might turn out to be even greater than wwe thought.
The CC did not arise from the brain of a teacher Union. It arose from the narrow interests of entrepreneurs who sold it as a pig in a poke before its unveiling. This is why legislators on the conservative side of the asile reacted against it in various states. In Tennessee, this resulted in a faux re-examination of the “standards” by teachers and a re-branding of the CC as the Tn-core. All of this played out in a political realm, not in any real back and forth with the teachers or their union (in Tennessee we lack the right to strike, so calling us a union is a misnomer).
Blaming the Union for CC is just like blaming the Hungarians for Hitler.
LikeLike
Who is “Zeev Wurman”?
Wurman’s confirmation bias causes him to bash and blame teachers unions for the very war billionaires are funding against public schools, public school teachers, and public school teachers’ unions
Wurman is a minion of the billionaires paid to write comments bashing and blaming teachers’ unions
I am angry at people like Wurman that fall in line like a good fascist after they had their brains hacked to attack labor unions, the only voice the working people have. Labor unions like teachers unions might not be perfect, but they are better than nothing.
President Theodore Roosevelt said as much back in the early 1900s. He said something like this when he defended the existence of labor unions” Labor unions might be corrupt but so are corporations and without labor unions, the working people will be treated like slave labor by those same corrupt corporations.
We have a choice
Corrupt corporations vs corrupt labor unions or just corrupt corporations, and what was life like in the United States back before 1900 when the labor movement gained momentum?
in 1900, FORTY percent of the population lived in poverty and because corrupt robber barrons and corporations had no opposition then, labor unions were born and we still need them.
LikeLike
Zeev Wurman works at the conservative Hoover Institution and writes for rightwing sites like Breitbart and Education Next.
https://www.hoover.org/profiles/zeev-wurman
LikeLike
Thank you. It seems I was right with my allegations. Zeev Wurman is a member of the fascist autocrats’ corrupt army of vampires.
Months ago, I reached a point of never agreeing to disagree with these fascist crooks and frauds. I have no respect for any of them.
LikeLike
I guess now we know that you also don’t like me, in addition to not liking Jamie Gass. In a sense, I feel honored.
But would you mind offering specific arguments related to the discussion at hand, rather than just spouting ad hominem attacks or voicing your irrelevant (and, anyway, largely incorrect) frustration that the history didn’t develop the way you would like it to?
LikeLike
No, I refuse to crawl down your rabbit hole and debate you over issues that have been proven wrong repeatedly. I have better things to do with my life than get in a debate with a brain-dead concrete wall, my image of you.
LikeLike
It’s weird to me how Massachusetts, a world renowned place for higher ed, can sign up for damaging educational trends dictated by politicians and business people.
Here is the beginning lines from MA dept of edu’s Vision Project.
The Metrics
The Vision Project proposes to hold public higher education accountable for achieving national leadership in the seven Vision-related outcomes by annually reporting our national standing with respect to each. Our rank will be reported in aggregated form for the three segments (community colleges, state universities, and University of Massachusetts) based on comparisons with groups of peer institutions in other states. It is our intention over time to integrate this report with the currently existing Performance Measurement Report, which already includes information on some of the outcomes associated with the Vision Project. There is still work to be done on how best to bring together these two aspects of public accountability.
http://www.mass.edu/visionproject/metrics.asp
I do not know how much other states demand metrics so openly. I asked 10 top math departments in the US if they used metrics to evalute their faculty, and only one (from MA) reported back that they indeed use metrics.
LikeLike
Brief explanation: under our Republican governor Charlie Baker (who plays a nice guy on the tv), our state board of education has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Waltons and the Kochs. Both these entities funded Baker’s Pioneer Institute when he was CEO. Jamie Gass is now the Pioneer Institute’s Director of the Center for School Reform.
LikeLike
The state education boards were appointed by Republican Governor Charlie Baker, who seems to be intent on driving down the quality of education, both public K-12 and higher education. He was a major supporter of the referendum to expand charter schools in the state in 2016. The measure was overwhelmingly defeated. Anyone who thinks that higher education can be reduced to a dataset is an ignoramus.
LikeLike
Interestingly, even private universities in MA use metrics. Their example weighs a lot when the politicians down here push for metrics.
LikeLike
Sad tale — with the well-known culprits.
LikeLike