Teresa Hanafin writes “Fast Forward” for the Boston Globe, where this appeared. I love her writing.
Trump has no public events on his schedule today, probably clearing the decks so he and his toadies can figure out how to explain away a troubling revelation by The Washington Post: This summer, during communications with a foreign leader — one US official said it was a phone call — Trump made a promise to that foreign leader that was so disturbing that an official in the US intelligence community filed a formal whistleblower report with the community’s inspector general.
That inspector general, Michael Atkinson, concluded that the report was credible and Trump’s conversation was a matter of “urgent concern,” a level of threat that requires intelligence officials to notify Congress — specifically, the oversight committees — within seven days.
Atkinson turned the complaint over to his boss, the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, who read the details and then refused to turn them over to Congress — apparently deciding that breaking the law to protect Dear Leader was far more important than protecting the country.
Atkinson, the IG, is testifying this morning before the House Intelligence Committee in a classified session closed to the public.
This is hardly the first time that the largemouth bass in the Oval Office has endangered national security. As recently as last October, he was using an unsecured iPhone to chit-chat with Lord knows who, calls that the Chinese and Russians eavesdropped on, freaking out intelligence officials who kept telling Trump to please knock it off.
And you may recall when the blunderbuss told two top Russian officials in the Oval Office about a top-secret intelligence operation in Syria, compromising the Israeli spy involved. And CNN reported that US intelligence officials were so worried about Trump’s loose lips that they yanked a valuable, high-level US spy out of Moscow.
And just yesterday, he screwed up again, revealing that the replacement steel fence being erected at the Mexican border is wired with sensors to detect climbers. That prompted Lieutenant General Todd Semonite, acting head of the Army Corps, to basically tell Trump to zip it: “Sir, there could be some merit in not discussing that.”
Trump also claimed that the wall was so hot, making it impossible to climb, that you could “fry an egg” on it. He then went over and touched the wall, signing it with a Sharpie. Nothing went up in smoke.

complicity with treason
LikeLike
Trump Tweet: “Knowing all of this, is anybody dumb enough to believe that I would say something inappropriate with a foreign leader …”
Trump said Putin and he “spent a great deal of time” in their discussions on Moscow’s alleged meddling in the 2016 election. Trump believed Putin over our Intelligence Community. “President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.” He also said the investigation into Russian interference was poisoning relations between the US and Russia.
Trump has proven that he is capable of saying something inappropriate with a foreign leader.
LikeLike
Oh come on! You can’t not see what’s going on here. This little tidbit has been released like a schoolgirl tittering, “I have a secret!” and than pretending she’s not going to tell. If what Trump allegedly promised to whoever this leader was was really so troubling, why do we know so little about it?
The fact is, whatever you think of Trump, he has not gotten us into further wars, which is really miffing to the national security state. He has said mean things about people liberals used to excoriate. So the intelligence community – now the darlings of liberals just because they say mean things about Trump – has motivation to make Trump look bad, especially if it can be tied to the failed and debunked Russiagate.
This is nothing more than a schoolyard feud among a bunch of overgrown mean girls (who just happen to be old men). The next thing you know, this little battle will lead to escalations against Russia and we’ll be one step closer to WWIII.
LikeLike
Funny, I never heard you defended the fake Hillary Clinton e-mail scandal that way.
Now exactly how is it you defend Trump’s foreign policy when it is no different than Obama’s?
Are you really somehow fine with drone strikes killing more people because Trump signed an executive order to keep them secret? Do you realize how many drones Trump has sent out killing people? Just because Trump has made sure Americans won’t know does not mean it isn’t happening. It is.
Do you truly believe that Putin does nothing untoward toward civilians because the Russian media doesn’t report it?
I don’t know why you think non-transparency in Trump’s regime means it is more honorable than what Obama did. In fact, any criticism you have of Obama is very likely being done 100x worse, but it isn’t reported. Lots more drone strikes since Trump took office, so why aren’t you as outraged as you are when Democrats do it?
I am unable to understand why you belittle critics of Trump this way as if Trump is not killing thousands of civilians just like Obama did when you could not stop talking about it.
You put Trump on some kind of pedestal and seem to think that Trump is conducting foreign policy in a more honorable way than Obama is when he is not. This children are still being killed but it doesn’t seem to bother you when it is a right wing Republican who has absolutely no redeeming issues when at least Democrats and progressives do.
LikeLike
“The Trump administration has carried out 176 strikes in Yemen in just two years, compared with 154 there during all eight years of Obama’s tenure, according to a count by The Associated Press and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
Experts also say drone strikes under President Trump have surged in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
And, as was the case during Obama’s presidency, these strikes have resulted in untold numbers of civilian casualties. According to the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, U.S. drone strikes in Afghanistan killed more than 150 civilians in the first nine months of 2018.
Amnesty International reports drones have killed at least 14 civilians in Somalia since 2017.
As of January of this year, U.S. drone strikes fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria have killed at least 1,257 civilians, according to the Pentagon, and a monitoring group, Airwars, estimates the number to be as great as 7,500.
That you might not be aware of what should be a startling and deeply troubling escalation in unaccountable remote-control warfare by the U.S. is both by design and default.”
S.E. Cupp wrote that and she is not a Democratic apologist.
I’m still trying to figure out why you don’t criticize Trump when he is doing exactly what you railed against the Democrats for doing.
LikeLike
NYC public school parent: I am appalled by remote-control warfare by drones. I hated it when it was done by Obama and things have gotten worse under Trump. There is no accurate account of how many civilians are being killed.
How long before terrorists are able to do the same thing inside this country?
……………………………………..
President Donald Trump was once apparently unhappy with the CIA’s desire to minimize civilian casualties when carrying out drone strikes, according to a Washington Post source who The Post said attended a meeting with Trump and agency officials.
On Trump’s first full day in office, in January 2017, according to The Post, the CIA showed Trump a recording of a drone strike in which operators had waited to strike until the target wandered away from his home, which had his family inside. But Trump apparently questioned the move.
“Why did you wait?” the person at the meeting recalled Trump saying.
LikeLike
It’s frightening. It is certainly right to oppose how Obama used drones, but to attack critics of Trump and insist that Trump is not doing the exact same things that Obama did except 1000x worse is incomprehensible to me. It is some kind of Democrat derangement syndrome in which one must conduct a massive rationalization as to why they insisted throughout the 2016 campaign that electing Trump was absolutely no worse than having an evil Democrat in power. So no matter how much Trump stomps all over every single principle and safeguard of democracy, everything Trump does is either better than the Democrats did, or all a big fake Russia story because no evidence will ever convince those people Trump is one of the single most dishonest and corrupt people to hold this office. And I include Nixon, who was awful but at least had some concern for this country’s future whereas Trump is incapable of concern for anyone but himself.
LikeLike
I think it is Trump who keeps saying to various countries that “we are locked and loaded.” What does that mean?
LikeLike
Not sure I buy your lighthearted version, Dienne. Let’s say the reporting official was a troublemaker just out to zing Trump– or maybe a self-righteous literal-minded stiff [like Comey]: are you saying, once the report is in play, that makes it OK for his boss to ignore the law? I don’t. If the whistleblower report was was a dirty trick or an overreaction, that would come out in Congress. But ignoring it undermines whistleblower law & magnifies presidential power, making us all less safe.
LikeLike
dienne, why would this kerfuffle lead to more sanctions against Russia – and nycpsp, why the diversion to talk of drone attacks? Am I missing something re: the whistleblower report?
LikeLike
bethree,
I absolutely salute you for writing a far more persuasive response to dienne77’s post than mine was.
I do not understand why anyone would try to normalize the Trump White House intentionally quashing a whistleblower complaint. Especially when the reasoning seems to be “whatever you think of Trump, he has not gotten us into further wars”, which is also true of Barack Obama but that did not mean that dienne77 believed that all criticism of Obama should be shut down.
I haven’t seen dienne77 condemning Trump’s drone strikes now that it is Trump killing far more civilians than Obama. After all, “whatever you think of Trump, he has not gotten us into further wars”. Neither did Obama. And that didn’t stop dienne77 and many people here from rightly criticizing him. So why aren’t we allowed to criticize Trump without feeling as if we are making mountains out of molehills about this wonderful President who is doing such a better job keeping the peace. And if you are so obsessed with Putiin that you believe our country should lay down and say “can’t get Putin mad, it will start WW III, then Trump is your guy.”
LikeLike
^And I was also reacting to dienne77 repeating the right wing/Putin propaganda talking points:
“the failed and debunked Russiagate.”
As anyone who actually has an ounce of integrity recognizes, the Trump campaign had many outrageous contacts with Russia — hello Trump Tower meeting! — and Trump “suggested” that Comey stop an FBI investigation into his highest level campaign staff and advisors’ contacts with Russia and fired Comey when he did not stop the investigation.
And the Mueller report speaks for itself. As the Nation reports:
“Mueller didn’t subpoena Donald Trump. Or Donald Trump Jr. Or Ivanka Trump. Or Eric Trump. Or Jared Kushner. His failure to directly ask those five principals a single in-person question represents a failure of his investigation. It’s a failure that will haunt this country for some time.
Mueller’s reasons for not subpoenaing Trump are what the scientists would call “bad.” The report says that investigators sought a sit-down interview with Trump, but were rebuffed. It says that they received written answers from Trump’s team, but these were “inadequate.” The report includes those written responses, and Trump’s lawyers use the phrase “can’t recall” 37 times, which puts Trump’s memory on par with a goldfish. Mueller concludes that the cost of issuing Trump a subpoena that would delay the investigation as Trump fought all the way to the Supreme Court outweighed the benefits of securing his testimony.”
Instead of being outraged that Mueller’s investigation was so limited, and wanting to know more, dienne77 characterizes the whole thing exactly like William Barr and Donald Trump do:
“failed and debunked Russiagate.”
Debunked? When that is a person’s sum up of the Mueller investigation, they are a right wing Republican. There can be no other reason for summing up what we know about Trump and Russia from the very limited Mueller investigation and claim it has all been “debunked”. So when that person insists that Trump is the guy who isn’t waging war against innocent civilians like the supposedly evil Obama and his even more evil henchwoman HRC, their extreme pro-Trump bias should be very clear.
LikeLike
I getcha nycpsp. & you’re preaching to the choir re: Trump. Just the fact that both the President’s sons, his daughter, & his son-in-law were all so close to the action they might even be considered for subpoenas in an investigation of foreign election meddling—that says it all about this prez. As far as I was concerned, the day he moved Ivanka & Jared into West Wing offices as ‘consultants’– & the govt stood by, thumb in mouth— the die was cast.
LikeLike
Perfect word for him: blunderbuss!
LikeLike
“This is hardly the first time that the largemouth bass in the Oval Office…”
Good one, bass works with or without the “b” as a descriptive of Trump, our dunce in chief.
LikeLike
I’m disappointed that “Nothing” went up in smoke when Trump touched the sizzling hot border fence that he bragged during the election would be like the Great Wall of China but better.
I’d dance in the streets if tomorrow I woke up and read that Trump jumped from a frying pan into a fire and “went up in smoke,” and that all of his minions followed him into the flames like want-to-be loyal Trumpish lemmings that they pretend to be until he fires them and then they go on a talk show and complain about how stupid and ignorant he is.
LikeLike
LIKE!!!
Am reading Siege right now, Lloyd. I recommend it to all here.
LikeLike
Thom’s Hartmann’s blog
Did Trump Commit Treason?
News reports increasingly are suggesting that Donald Trump has committed treason in making a promise to a foreign leader. The question is, who is the foreign leader and what was the promise? It’s important to remember that this is a man who inherited over $1 billion in today’s money from his father, and then proceeded to lose much if not all of it through stupid business decisions. Even his real estate business, a fragment of which is still left, apparently only continues to exist because Justice Anthony Kennedy’s son was willing to sign off on Trump’s loans with Deutsche bank, and those loans may even have been cosigned by foreign oligarchs. This man is so incompetent and so dishonest that anything is possible. Americans are now left guessing, what kind of treason has Trump committed this time, and with whom?
According to the The Washington Post which first reported the complaint Trump has talked to 5 foreign leaders. They are…
— Russian President Vladimir Putin
— North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un
— The Prime Minister of Pakistan
— The Prime Minister of the Netherlands
— The Emir of Qatar
Who do you think Trump betrayed America with?
-Thom
LikeLike
It couldn’t have been Angela Merkel (he can’t pronounce her name).
LikeLike
Any consideration that the email scandal involving HRC was anything but a political kerfufle should be put to rest by the stoic silence on the part of the unconcerned republicans. We spent millions of dollars over the emails with little purpose except discrediting a political figure.
For these millions we got a whole string of executive actions gutting the oversight duties of the federal government, brought to you by the Trump regime.
LikeLike
Carter said he wanted his namesake institution to focus on ending wars, addressing global warming, securing human rights, working on treating people better and constructively criticizing the United States. This is what a president should be working for. Marrianne Williamson wants to start a Peace Department as part of the president’s cabinet.
Something major has to change.
…………………………………………………………
Jimmy Carter: ‘It Would Be a Disaster to Have Four More Years of Trump’
By Ernie Suggs, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
19 September 19
Former President Jimmy Carter took aim at President Donald Trump on Tuesday night, calling him “a disaster.”
Carter’s wife, Rosalynn, also criticized Trump, saying he has encouraged racism.
The sharp words came as the Carters addressed a crowd at the Carter Center in an update on the Atlanta-based center’s work.
Carter, 94, said it could be the last time he and Rosalynn, 92, would address them as he laid out a plan for how the Carter Center could go on without them.
The former president said he wanted his namesake institution to focus on ending wars, addressing global warming, securing human rights, working on treating people better and constructively criticizing the United States.
Those were also ideas that he wants to pass along to the remaining Democratic candidates vying for the presidency.
“If they do those things, I would probably vote for them. I don’t know who I will vote for, but I will vote for one of them,” Carter said. “I voted for Bernie (Sanders) the last time. But one of the major factors I have in my mind is who can beat Trump. Because I think it would be a disaster to have four more years of Trump.”…
https://www.ajc.com/news/breaking-news/jimmy-carter-says-trump-election-would-disaster/qyjNmDBAIVbccBQxLvao1O/
LikeLike
Trump is a very, very dim bulb and a very sick fellow. Having an ideology requires having ideas, but he has very, very few. Instead, he has impulses and notions. He was evidently belittled and bullied by his father as a child, and at the same time, he was taught that he was of a superior race and caste. As a result, he grew up very needy and with one aim: to show his own worth. His whole life has screamed, look at me, me, me!!! See, that’s MY NAME up there!!!
The one thing Trump cares about is Trump, and what’s worked for him in the past, sort of, is bs-ing and bullying his way through life, refusing, ever, to admit a mistake. Like any lowlife mob boss, he seems to believe that all that matters is his own will (and others’ obedience to that will). And this is what makes murderous dictators attractive to him, for he shares with them this belief that his own will is all that matters. If there is any “idea” that he is committed to, it’s that some people (Donald, Ivanka) are naturally superior (are “winners”) and that others are naturally inferior (are “losers” from “sh-thole” places). This idea appeals to him because it feeds into his extreme narcissism, which in turn derives from his mistreatment as a child.
Go back a few decades and you will find Trump hanging with the Clintons and with Epstein and espousing his support for abortion rights. But, opportunist that he is, and perhaps under the coaching of his mentor and puppeteer Vlad, he saw an opportunity to run on the Repugnican ticket and so improve his brand in preparation for a big score on a Trump tower in Moscow. Shockingly, to the country and to himself, he won, barely. And since then, a coterie of ghouls around him has manipulated his breathtaking incompetence and ignorance and refusal to back down on any prior position, however absurd, to further the short-term enrichment goals of themselves and their buddies among oligarchs worldwide. In the process, the Repugnican Limbo Party (how low, how low, how low will they go) has become irredeemable. Soon, it will be history–the ugly before picture.
LikeLike
I”m sure Trump would LOVE to have all journalists take a test on the political ideologies of President Trump. He has no ideologies but taking press credentials away from all of those ‘fake’ media giants like NYT, CNN and WaPo would be his ideal situation. Only devoted Fox journalists would survive.
…………………………
Loyalty test State media journalists in China will be required to take an exam on the political ideologies of President Xi Jinping.
From Inkstone:
Chinese journalists to be tested on loyalty to Xi Jinping
Launched in January by the propaganda department, it is an example of the party using tech to strengthen its ideological control.The name translates as “study to strengthen the nation,” but also plays on the character “Xi” to suggest it is a way for people to learn about their head of state…
The media oversight office made clear that updated press cards, which are essential for those working in the industry, would only be issued to journalists who had passed the exam. Those who fail will have one chance to take the test again, according to the notice.Reporters and editors will be able to prepare for the exam using sample questions that will be uploaded to the app from Monday, news website Sohu.com reported on Wednesday.
The exam has five sections, with at least two of them focused on Xi’s political thinking and one on Marxism, according to the report…
https://inks.tn/u0ft?utm_source=email&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=share_button
LikeLike
This is why there is no money to expand Social Security, add Medicare for All or help people in developing countries. The US must ‘be ready to kill’ at any time in every place in the world. I want to know how much money is being spent on all these bases? How much is being spent on wars that never end? Only when this is brought under control will the US be once again respected. Selling military hardware to other countries must stop. There is always more money for war. It is estimated that there are 800 US bases around the world.
Overseas Military Bases
Published on Aug. 27, 2019
An interesting look at how many bases the United States military has overseas and the strategy on where these bases or located.
LikeLike
I’ve read that there is a lot of public money beyond the Defense Budget that is hidden from public view due to “security issues”, and that money funds efforts by the CIA and other military intelligence agencies to wage war against anyone, anyone deemed an enemy of the United States corporate theocracy waging wars against any hint of socialism, the spread of Islam, and Communism.
I think it is called “dark money”.
I know someone that was in the military a lot longer than I was. He also served in Special Forces and he told me that every year, U.S. Special Forces teams slip in and out of an average of 130 countries a year to deal with those “threats”, and most of those countries do not even know it is happening.
LikeLike
This is from the WH: [BARF!] Gee, I wonder why this came from Faux.
Trump Touts Newly Constructed Border Wall Sections
-Fox News
“In an exclusive interview on ‘Fox & Friends’ Thursday, President Trump told Fox News’ Ed Henry that ‘brand-new’ wall sections have been built along the U.S.-Mexico border, contrary to claims by some Democrats,” Edmund DeMarche writes. “Trump said the new wall sections include 14 miles at the site in California, where the interview was held. ‘This was not here two weeks ago. This is all brand-new wall. … We’re building on many different sites all up and down along the border,’ he said, adding that the new 30-foot barrier was impenetrable even by ‘championship mountain climbers.’”
Something to share: Great progress being made on the wall!
LikeLike