| We are writing today to welcome the new landmark resolution by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights published yesterday that addresses the role of private actors in education and health.The resolution on ‘States’ obligation to regulate private actors involved in the provision of health and education services’ reaffirms that African States are ‘the duty bearers for the protection and fulfilment of economic, social and cultural rights, in particular the rights to health and education without discrimination, for which quality public services are essential’. It also expresses concerns at the current trend amongst bilateral donors and international institutions of putting ‘pressure on States Parties to privatize or facilitate access to private actors in their health and education sectors’ in disregard of these obligations.
In this context, the African Commission calls on States to ‘take appropriate policy, institutional and legislative measures to ensure respect, protection, promotion and realization of economic, social and cultural rights, in particular the right to health and education’ by adopting ‘legislative and policy frameworks regulating private actors in social service delivery’ and ensuring ‘that their involvement is in conformity with regional and international human rights standards’.
The resolution refers to and sets standards that are in line with the recently adopted Abidjan Principles on the human rights obligations of States to provide public education and to regulate private involvement in education. The Commission notably calls on States to ‘consider carefully the risks for the realization of economic, social and cultural rights of public-private partnerships and ensure that any potential arrangements for public-private partnerships are in accordance with their substantive, procedural and operational human rights obligations.’
Salima Namusobya, the Executive Director of the Initiative for Social and Economic Rights (ISER), stated: ‘We have seen the realisation of economic, social, and cultural rights hindered by the uncontrolled and unregulated development of private actors in social services delivery, such as health and education. Governments’ increasing reliance on private schools and clinics is facilitated by declining State investment in these essential public services and a blind belief in market solutions. The African Commission’s resolution is an important step towards ensuring greater accountability for States to deliver quality public services, as they are legally bound to do under national and international law.’
Research conducted globally and across the African continent in recent years has documented how the failure of States to adequately invest in public services, pro-market ideology and inadequate regulation of the private sector are leading to increasingly detrimental impacts on human rights: growing discrimination and segregation owing to unaffordable fees, lack of transparency and accountability, inequity, misuse of resources, and corporate control over services which are essential for the development of open and fair societies.
Human rights researchers, scholars, activists and bodies have provided a strong framework in the last years to analyse and respond to this phenomenon. In February 2019, over 50 eminent experts from around the world adopted in Côte d’Ivoire the Abidjan Principles on the right to education which unpack States’ existing human rights obligations in this context. In the field of health, in April 2019, ISER launched an analysis of private involvement in health using the human rights framework.
Sylvain Aubry, a Legal and Research Advisor at the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR), commented: ‘With this resolution, the African Commission is sending a powerful message to the world. It reaffirms the inalienable human rights requirements to provide quality public services and to regulate private actors, and the obligation of States to meet their human rights standards, such as the detailed guidelines provided in the Abidjan Principles. Human rights scholars, activists and communities across the continent have repeatedly said that a market-approach to social services is not compatible with human rights standards. We hope that African leaders will put the resolution in practice, and that it will lead the way for other regional and UN human rights mechanisms to follow suit.’
“I think the resolution is a welcome development and a bold step on the part of the African Commission given the weak or lack of regulation of the activities of private actors in many African countries. This resolution becomes an important standard that can be used to prevent or minimize the negative impacts of the activities of private actors in the enjoyment of socioeconomic rights. Given the impact of the activities on non state actors on access to water, it is crucial that future guidance from the African Commission on private actors addresses more than health or education.” Ebenezer Durojaye, Dullah Omar Institute.
The Initiative for Social and Economic Rights, the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Dullah Omar Institute, and the Right to Education Initiative welcome this commitment of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights to the realisation of economic, social and cultural rights and hopes that this will be followed by continuing work of the institution on these issues. The resolution as well as the interpretative guidance provided by the Abidjan Principles constitute a milestone in building and enforcing regulatory frameworks for private actors in social services and will strengthen government’s’ efforts to regulate private actors.
Documents:
Contacts:
- Salima Namusobya (EN), Executive Director, Initiative for Social and Economic Rights: dir@iser-uganda.org
- Sylvain Aubry (FR/EN), Legal and Policy Advisor, Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: +254 7 88 28 96 34 / +33 7 81 70 81 96 / sylvain@globalinitiative-escr.org
- Delphine Dorsi (FR/EN/ES), Director, Right to Education Initiative: 44 77 06 756 077 / delphine.dorsi@right-to-education.org
- Prof Ebenezer Durojaye (EN), Project Head and Senior Researcher, Socio-Economic Rights Project, Dullah Omar Institute, University of Western Cape: +27 71 918 9056 / edurojaye@uwc.ac.za
|
Thank you, Diane, for this important post.
Privatization (i.e., expropriation by distant, private interests) is the new (and old) colonialism. It wasn’t called the East India COMPANY for no reason.
LikeLike
Now it’s the West Swindlya Company
LikeLike
They’ve been privatizing not just schools but health clinics?! That brings everything about Bill Gates into focus. Everything everything every single little thing he does is wrong. Neither he nor his foundation have ever engaged in a single act of philanthropy in this world. Not one.
LikeLike
And (1) NPQ reports that the Gates Foundation Trust invests in private prisons…200,000 shares added. (July 2019) (2) The Gates Foundation CEO is the lead independent board member on Zuck’s Facebook.
(3) Gates and John Arnold sponsored a higher ed session at Tom Daschle’s lobby shop, BiPartisan Policy Center. The listed attendees included, a single university, the former Kaplan, and a single current politician, the privatizing Rep. Susan Davis (DFER). Tom Daschle chairs the board of the Gates-funded CAP (4) This month, the Center for American Progress posted “Corruption Consultants” which criticized privatization while deliberately omitting school privatization (charter schools).
LikeLike
“Human rights scholars, activists and communities across the continent have repeatedly said that a market-approach to social services is not compatible with human rights standards.”
Privatization is not about improvement although it is marketed that way, particularly by billionaires and corporations. Privatization is mostly about creating streams of revenue for the already wealthy as public money is diverted into private pockets. The public loses a public asset and all the democratic governance and rights associated with it. It is no accident that poor, marginalized communities that already lack agency are targeted. It is a way for the wealthy to make money off the poor, and the so-called service provided is often worse than the public option was. Deregulation creates a climate where privately contracted providers can fleece taxpayers. That is why hedge fund managers promote privatization. It is a Wall St. scam!
LikeLike
The Commission is very wise. STiR (Uganda) has a strategic partnership with Surgo Foundation. Surgo was founded by a person who has held multiple roles with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The plan, “integrating behavioral science approaches into STiR’s education programming and strategies across the globe”.
LikeLike
**. . . across the globe. . . ** <–scary stuff. My guess is that the oligarchic “THEY” including the Gates don’t think of public monies as “public,” but rather as wrongly diverted monies from whatever taxes THEY have had to pay, regardless of how hard they tried to avoid them. That way, they can view their own taxes–the one’s they cannot avoid–as actually having ROI’s.
As long as their view of capitalism as cronyism and predatory, and as long as monies and power are the only ROI’s they view as sacred cows, DEREGULATION will be the nail in the coffin of what is legitimately “public” in republican and “demos” in democracy.
If they won’t control themselves for the greater good (and they won’t), someone has to; and regulation under the banner of the common good is where it’s at. BTW, it seems someone poisoned Putin’s political challenger. Funny how that works. CBK
LikeLike
Your final paragraph- spot on, Catherine. The SSIR site provides the opportunity for the minions of billionaire philanthropists to describe their goals. IMO, the articles are overwhelmingly written by people who lack consciences.
Scary indeed, including Stanford think tank where Theranos found its beginning, where those wanting to gut public pensions end up after being discredited at other universities,….
LikeLike
Linda As we speak (2:22 PST) there is a Congressional hearing on Facebook and the establishment of Libra, a new world-wide money system, or “digital currency,” professed to serve people by lowering costs, etc. Even the senators (Kennedy, Sherrod Brown, and others) are referring to how powerful (politically and otherwise) and UN-manageable such an order would be. The company (ies) would have access to ALL financial data, generated over the entire world. On the other hand, the Senators are also talking as if they are going to approve it. Scary indeed. Brings up that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. A quote from David Marcus “We will do what it takes to earn their customers’ trust.” ha ha ha ha ha ha . . . CBK
LikeLike
A critic described Senator Brown, “He always caves on financial issues”.
Brown asked DeVos for $71 mil. to expand charters in Ohio after and during the taxpayers’ fleecing of hundreds of millions by charters.
The best thing that can be said about Brown is he is a lite blue Democrat in a reddish state.
Rick Santorum promotes Cathio, cryptocurrency for Catholics.
Libra hastens the timing of the inevitable massive conflict caused by wealth concentration, similar to the election of Biden.
LikeLike
“the oligarchic “THEY” including the Gates don’t think of public monies as “public,” but rather as wrongly diverted monies from whatever taxes THEY have had to pay, regardless of how hard they tried to avoid them.”
It’s not just the “oligarchic THEY’, but every business owner that I know, who also do their best to not pay any taxes as well that’s what’s tax lawyers are for eh, ALL think that their monies are being stolen from them and that the only thing to do is to avoid paying taxes in order to keep their “hard earned monies”. They’re all proponents of the pissonpeeons economic school of supposed thought.
LikeLike
Addendum Also, it seems to me that the Gates et al have NO IDEA about what national sovereignty means; or how their fundamental ideas and their implementation intrude on it, now in African nations. Kudos to them for their “big history” understanding of what is going on.
And even if Gates DID portray and pursue good educational principles, which we know is NOT A GIVEN, again, he misses the sovereign part.
That political and spiritual ignorance, however, applies also the the United States where the Gates apparently cannot see themselves through the analogy of slipping away from democratic institutions (public) towards fascism through their willful disregard of the basic frameworks that hold up our own democratic sovereignty (again, here in the US also). And I think Gates still thinks he’s an “American.” They are, at the very least, enablers of fascism and how it works. If they are ignorant of the slow demolishing of democracy, . . . does not mean they are not responsible for its demise.
And if Congress is bought-and-paid-for FOR THEM, these idiots will be the first to scream “corruption!” when it doesn’t go their way. And they will be right. CBK
LikeLike
The Gates’ definition of charity, the public interest, doing good, etc. doesn’t conform to the understanding that emotionally developed people have, IMO.
A former member of of the Foundation’s strategic investment team concluded after the failure of a company the Foundation funded, “We are now much more careful in looking for a high degree of overlap between the company’s goals and our charitable goals.” Gates’ investment in New Schools Venture Fund fits the agenda. NSVF identified the goal of charters in Philanthropy Roundtable, “…brands on a large scale”.
The Gates Foundation doesn’t have an open grants process. I presume they look for grantees and employees who conform to their emotional development level.
LikeLike
Linda I think you are right about the emotional level.
However, I think there is more to it–first, in the hierarchy of established values (on a scale of 1-10, around a 4 . . . maybe); and second, in one or the other of these:
EITHER: a seemingly complete lack of openness and socio-political awareness/ astuteness, apparently driven by the self-delusion that they are REALLY doing good;
OR an awareness, and so, with it, a conscious embrace of the lesser horizon of self-aggrandizement stimulated, again, by their financial power and its political result: first, paternalism, and then operative and self-justified fascism. CBK
LikeLike
Human predators share a belief in their superiority. The NYT reported Epstein’s do-gooding plan was to spread his DNA for humanity’s benefit, by impregnating lots of women. Feeding his sense of superiority, he surrounded himself with harvard scientists and selectively gave grants to the school’s professors.
Gates targeted harvard’s education dept. for grants, funding a professor who established his own superiority bona fides in his call for two-tier education.
Definitely, harvard’s selection of Larry Summers as its president, who is friends with harvard professor/architect of Russian privatization, solidified the connection between harvard, flouting laws, and predation.
LikeLike
In the Democratic debate last night Bernie and Warren scored points for calling out corporations for not being patriots. They are not interested in improving conditions for workers. They would move to Mexico, China or Vietnam to save a nickel in production costs. People need to hear that message as often billionaires and corporations are portrayed as being civic minded, but they rarely are. They will “donate” money, but it is often seed money for a much bigger ROI. Gates is a master at this strategy.
LikeLike
American money spreading GERM in anticipation of $tandardizing profit flow from poor countries rich in exploitable resources.
LikeLike
Never miss an opportunity to exploit the vulnerable.
LikeLike
My suggestion: let those Western Corporations pour in the money to build an educational infrastructure. Then, in a few years, nationalize education throughout Africa and take everything those greedy, lying, corrupt, power hunger corporations built and even confiscate all the cash they hold in African banks.
LikeLike
In theory that’s a good idea, but unfortunately, people like Gates never use much of their own money. They always use their money to leverage much morePUBlIC funding for dubious purposes, as Gates did for Common Core.
So a huge amount of public money gets thrown down rat holes to support the pet projects of the privatizers and what the public ends up with (besides a huge bill) is junk that is not worth a dime.
LikeLike
SDP,
That’s a very important point.
States spent billions implementing Common Core—new standards, new tests, new teacher training, more tech for testing.
Gates has also used a few millions to open public purse for charters. In Washington State, he could have easily supported the 12 charters that opened but he insisted they had to be paid for by the state, not him. Washington now has 10-12 charters enrolling 3500 kids, paid for with lottery receipts.
LikeLike
-the state of Washington, which has the most regressive tax system in the nation. The poor pay a rate up to 7 times that of Gates.
LikeLike
Thanks for reminding me what I forgot, that the rich (also frauds, crooks, con-men, pickpockets, identify thieves, anyone named Trump, et al) like to use other people’s money to grow their own wealth and never risk their own gold and silver.
LikeLike
Privatization has always been about confiscating the commons for one’s own use and gain.
In other words, it’s about stealing.
LikeLike
No doubt- Poet,
American oligarchs plot to take the citizens’ most important common good- Walton heirs and Bill Gates most notable among them.
Larry Summers, one of two “Distinguished Senior Fellows” at CAP, was harvard’s president when $22 mil. settled a lawsuit involving Larry’s friend, a harvard professor who was architect of Russian privatization. It’s not a coincidence that Gates’ steers harvard’s dept. of ed. ($1 mil. in grants to Roland Fryer, proponent of two-teir education, one for the wealthy, the other for the poor which coincidentally enriches tech firms.)
LikeLike
Game, Set and Match
Once you’ve taken schools
The protesting will cease
Cuz schools are tidal pools
Where self-rule does increase
LikeLike
Summers is a piece of work.
He authored the infamous memo with the following theme (plan?)
“Dirty’ Industries: Just between you and me, shouldn’t the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Least Developed Countries]?”
Summers epitomizes the absolute worst aspects of mainstream (aka shitstream) economics.
LikeLike
Just between you and me, shouldn’t We the People be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty economists to Infinity and beyond?
LikeLike
Leaked Summers’ memo from 1991, “Underpopulated countries in Africa are vastly under polluted…the economic logic…impeccable.”
And, from 2013, by Dean Baker (CEPR) “Larry Summers and the Davos Scam”.
Summers mentored Sheryl Sandberg and, a lesser know mentee, James Poterba (NBER), who was the Ph.d. advisor for the most well known professor of pension alarmism. The pension research the alarmist authored at one university was discredited, then, he surfaced at the Stanford Institute for the Evisceration of People’s Retirement.
Summers is the person that CAP chooses to honor as one of its two “Distinguished Senior Fellows”. harvard connects Summers and Epstein.
LikeLike
Two of the biggest instances of privatization came when white Europeans settled the Americas and then stole people from Africa to serve as slaves.
And now the white men are back at the job they never finished in Africa.
LikeLike
Here is some basic information about education in Africa:http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/school-resources-and-learning-environment-in-africa-2016-en/school-resources-and-learning-environment-in-africa-2016-en.pdf
LikeLike
And here are some reports about education in Nigeria: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/3RbFXDdBw3g0HQG0fpyD0xF/why-nigerias-educational-system-is-in-crisis-and-how-to-fix-it
LikeLike
Calling Bill Gates. Fix Nigeria like you fixed the US
LikeLike
I thought actual facts about public education in the many countries on the African continent would be relevant to a discussion about public education in the many countries of the African continent. Perhaps I was foolish to believe that.
LikeLike
Run for your lives. A bolt of lightning is going to strike te. He’s admonishing others to use facts.
LikeLike
The Billionaire’s Burden” (based on
“The White Man’s Burden”, by Rudyard
Kipling”)
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
Send forth the tests ye breed
Go bind your schools to test style,
To serve his market’s need;
The weight of heavy VAMness,
On captive folk and mild—
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half teacher and half child.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
In patience to abide,
To veil the scheme for teach-bots,
The prime intent to hide;
With coded speech of Orwell,
You really must take pains
To make a hefty profit,
And see the major gains.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
The public schools to fleece—
Fill full the days with testing
And Common Core disease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end that you have sought,
Destroy the Opt-out movement
Lest work be all for naught.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
A tawdry rule of Kings,
The toil of IT keeper,
The sale of software things.
The data ye shall enter,
On privacy to tread,
To make a “decent” living,
Until they all are dead.
Take up the Billionaire’s burden
And reap his old reward:
The blame of those ye better,
The hate of those ye guard—
The cry of hosts ye humour
(Ah, slowly!) toward the light:—
“Why brought he us from ignorance
From clueless, blissful night?”
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
Ye dare not stoop to less—
So fulminate ‘gainst Apple
To cloak your Siri-ness;
And strategize in whispers,
For all ye leave or do,
Or silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh Diane on you!
Take up the Billionaire’s burden,
Have done with childish ways—
The Kindergarten playing,
The test-less former days
Come now, to join Reform-hood,
The pride of Duncan years
Cold, edged with Gates-bought wisdom,
The plan of Billionaires!
LikeLike