The Center for American Progress is considered by the media to be the voice of the Democratic establishment, or at least the Obama-Clinton center of the party. Referred to as CAP, it is resolutely pro-charter school, pro-testing, and anti-voucher (if it were not anti-voucher, its education agenda would be identical to the DeVos agenda).
So who are the experts who speak for the Democratic mainstream?
Our reader Laura Chapman is a dogged and diligent researcher. She studied the CAP website and posted the following review of the members of the CAP staff who write about K-12 education. It is interesting to see overlaps with Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Educational Excellence (which is stridently pro-voucher), the unaccredited Broad Residency (which advocates for closing public schools and replacing them with charters) and other decided not-progressive connections.
She writes here:
In April 2019, CAP had seven “experts” for K-12 education, several more for preschool and postsecondary education. I have looked at the bios of the K-12 experts and read some of their recent articles at the CAP website. Some artiles have appeared in Forbes, US News and World Report, The Hill, Hechinger Report, and The 74 (Walton funded blog). Who are these CAP experts? What do they say?
Neil Campbell, Director of Innovation for K-12 Education Policy. Former Director, Next Generation program for Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education with policy oversight for personalized learning, course access, funding, and student data privacy. Obama’s USDE Chief of staff, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development; former Director of Strategic Initiatives for tech-based learning at Education Elements.com; work at The Boston Consulting Group. Education: Bachelor economics, political science, Case Western Reserve University; MBA, Vanderbilt University; The Broad Residency in Education. Teaching Experience: Not found.
Sample of writing for CAP: Excerpt from “Teacher Strikes, Charter Schools and Unions, February 26, 2019. “It’s unfortunate that questions about charter schools are diverting attention from the core message of these teacher protests: the need to invest in our schools, teachers and students. Instead of focusing on division, it would be powerful for teachers, unions and charter supporters to advocate together for greater investments in public education across the board. Every student deserves a building, supports and supplies needed to succeed, and every teacher — in traditional or charter schools — deserves to be treated and paid like a professional.”
Excerpt from “Policy Ideas to Improve Private School Voucher Programs,” November 19, 2018. “The Center for American Progress believes that public money should fund public schools, whether they are neighborhood schools, magnet or specialty programs in traditional school districts, or public charter schools that are open to all students and accountable to the public.”
Excerpt from “The Progressive Case for Charter Schools, With a Correction,” October 24, 2017.“Despite recent evidence suggesting that many public charter schools are improving outcomes for students—especially for low-income students of color—broad support for charter schools may be waning. According to one recent poll (Education Next, 2017) support for charter schools among self-described Democrats has fallen over the past year. This decrease in progressive support may be due to a skewed representation of charter schools in the media as well as a conflation of charter schools with ineffective private school vouchers—such as those Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and the Trump administration champion. However, to simply devalue all charter schools is unreasonable. The highest-quality charters exemplify progressive values and practices, most notably through their foundational principle of providing low-income students of color with equal educational opportunity and access they may not otherwise have.” (Links are to Uncommon Schools, KIPP, and Achievement First).
Khalilah M. Harris, Managing Director for K-12 Education Policy. Former host and producer of Real News Network’s Baltimore Bureau; Founder, 2007, Baltimore City Freedom Academy, a charter school closed in 2013; Co-founder Baltimore Coalition of Black Leaders in Education. Active in EduColor movement; Former Deputy Director, Obama’s White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans; Manager, Obama’s Diversity and Inclusion in Government Council. Education: Morgan State University; J.D. University of Maryland School of Law; Ed.D. University of Pennsylvania, 2018 Dissertation: “Chasing Equity: A Study on the Influence of Black Leaders on Federal Education Policy-making.” No CAP publications. Teaching: No K-12 Found.
Laura Jiménez, Director of Standards and Accountability. Former Director, College and Career Readiness and Success at the American Institutes for Research (AIR); former Director, American Youth Policy Center. Manager, National Youth Employment Coalition (a three-year pilot funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates and Nellie Mae Foundations); UCLA Minority Training Program in Cancer Control Research. Obama’s USDE, former special assistant on Every Student Succeeds Act “flexibility,” college and career readiness, special populations (American Indian/Alaska Native and English language learners). Education: BA English, UCLA; Master’s Social Welfare, University of California; Berkeley. Teaching (?): Peace Corps, Community Education volunteer.
Sample of writing for CAP: “Furthering the College and Career Readiness of the District of Columbia’s Students” for the Council of the District of Columbia on Education Reform.” May 2018. Her written testimony argues for all high school students to take ”four years of English; three years of math, up to Algebra II; three years of social studies, including U.S. and world history; three years of lab science, including biology, chemistry, and physics; and two years of the same foreign language” with an option in every high school of at least three courses in the same career pathway (e.g., hospitality, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). She also endorsed these policies: Monitoring chronic absenteeism at every grade, investing in low cost interventions for absences (e.g., postcards to parents), monitoring at risk students in order to target wraparound supports. Frequent reference citations to Gates-funded Data Quality Campaign and The Education Trust.
Lisette Partelow, Senior Director of K-12 Strategic Initiatives. Prior positions: Senior Policy Analyst CAP, Director of Teacher Policy, CAP; Legislative Associate, Alliance for Excellent Education; Senior Legislative Assistant US House of Representatives; Research Assistant American Institutes for Research (AIR). Education: BA Psychology, Public Policy, Connecticut College; Masters in Public Affairs, Princeton University: Masters in Education, George Mason University. Teaching: Teach for America, first grade, two years, Washington, D.C.
Sample of writing for CAP: In August 2018, Partelow and research assistant Sarah Shapiro wrote about “Curriculum Reform in the Nation’s Largest School Districts.” The authors used the Gates-funded EdReports criteria for judging whether fourth-and eighth-grade math and ELA instructional materials were aligned with the Common Core. They also cite the Louisiana Department of Education’s system of rating instructional materials as exemplary for offering “a snapshot of the current status of the adoption of curriculum reform and instructional materials in the districts.” In fact, the rating criteria for Louisiana are nearly identical to EdReports.
Scott Sargrad, Vice President, K-12 Education Strategic Initiatives. Prior positions: VP for K-12 Policy CAP; Managing Director, Education Policy CAP; Director for Standards and Accountability, CAP. Obama’s USDE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Strategic Initiatives: Senior Policy Advisor, Presidential Management Fellow. Intern, Vietnam Assistance for the Handicapped Hanoi, Vietnam. Education: BA Mathematics, Philosophy, Haverford College; Ed.M. Education and Management, Harvard Graduate School of Education.Teaching: Math and Cross-Country Track Coach, Queen Anne School (private), Upper Marlboro MD; Special education instructional assistant Harriton High School, Rosemont, PA.
Sample of writing for CAP: August 9 2018. “Are High School Diplomas Really a Ticket to College and Work? An Audit of State High School Graduation Requirements”(co-authored with Laura Jimenez) argues for more rigorous standards and courses for high school graduation suitable for “college AND career.” The term “audit” refers to three levels of quality ratings assigned to high school curricula in each state, based on perfect alignment with the specific courses that public colleges in each state seek for admission. No state received the highest rating. The report has other ratings for career and technical education (CTE) and a well-rounded education (e.g., life skills courses, financial literacy, online learning, business and communications, civic engagement). The authors say: “One promising approach to address the alignment and quality concerns is competency-based graduation requirements.” This report recycles ideas from the Education Trust (HS transcript data up to 2013), old data on course availability from the Civil Rights Data Project (2014), among other sources. In Appendix A, there are no active links to 137 of the 238 sources of data. https://c0arw235.caspio.com/dp/b7f930000e16e10a822c47b3baa2
Cynthia G. Brown, Senior Fellow, former Vice President for Education Policy at CAP; former Director “Renewing Our Schools, Securing Our Future National Task Force on Public Education,” a joint initiative (2004) of CAP and the Institute for America’s Future. Thirty-five years of work in education, many as an independent consultant. Former Director of the Resource Center on Educational Equity, Council of Chief State School Officers. First Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights in USDE (1980 appointment, President Carter). Principal deputy, Department of Health, Education and Welfare’s Office for Civil Rights. Other work for Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Children’s Defense Fund. Current: Board of Directors of the American Youth Policy Forum; Perry Street Preparatory Public Charter School, District of Columbia. Education: BA, Oberlin College: MPA Syracuse University. Teaching: None found. No CAP publications listed since 2013.
Catherine Brown. In February 2019, CAP replaced Catherine Brown as Vice President for K-12 Education Policy. Brown was “transitioned to a Senior Fellow role at the Center.” As of April 26, 2019 Catherine Brown did not appear on CAP’s website as a Senior Fellow or on the roster for CAP Action. Her LinkedIn bio affirms her recent move to Senior Fellow at CAP.
Brown joined CAP in 2014 after serving as vice president of policy, Teach for America. She directed Teach for America’s Early Childhood Initiative, and successfully lobbied USDE for a $50 million Investing in Innovation grant for TFA. Brown is a longtime insider on Capitol Hill. She was the senior education policy advisor for George Miller chair of the House Committee on Education and Labor offering recommendations on standards, assessments, and charter schools among other issues. Brown was the “domestic policy advisor” for presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and legislative assistant for Senator Clinton on major initiatives (e.g., preschool, college affordability, job training). Brown also served as an organizer for Democrats in Montana and as a research assistant, Mathematica Policy Research. Education: Smith College, Master in public policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Teaching experience: None Found.
Writing for CAP. Catherine Brown was a co-author of the“The Progressive Case for Charter Schools,” October, 2017, which was posted on this blog recently.
Brown’s July 2018 article in Forbes “Proposing A $10,000 Raise For Teachers” highlights a CAP proposal for a federal tax credit for teachers in high poverty schools. Brown developed that idea, reported in detail at. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2018/07/13/453102/give-teachers-10000-raise/
Brown was recently credited as “consulting” with presidential candidate Kamala Harris on a similar proposal. Harris has proposed matching teacher salaries with federal funds. http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/03/reformers-and-unions-love-harriss-teacher-pay-plan.html#comments
Ulrich Boser, Senior Fellow, Founding director, CAP’s Science of Learning initiative. Founder, The Learning Agency.com. Book: “Learn Better: Mastering the Skills for Success in Life, Business, and School, or, How to Become an Expert in Just About Anything” (2017); also “The Leap: The Science of Trust and Why It Matters,” (2014). Book publicity in Wired, Slate, Vox, Fast Company, The Atlantic, USA Today. Former advisor, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Articles in U.S. News and World Report, Education Week, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Smithsonian, The Washington Post. Education: BA, Dartmouth College, with honors. Teaching: None Found.
Sample of writing for CAP: “How to Match Students With Schools They Choose,” November 13, 2018. (This reflects an uncritical acceptance of school choice and explains one app enrollment) [Editor’s note:. Boser write a strongly critical article about vouchers, but has never written critically about charters. CAP seems to have a party line that protects the legacy of Race to the Top.]
“Homework and Higher Standards: How Homework Stacks Up to the Common Core,” February 13, 2019. Study based on 187 examples of homework submitted by parents and an opinion survey from 372 parents about that homework. Key findings: Homework is largely aligned to the Common Core standards but often focused on low-level skills that fail to challenge students (especially in primary grades). CAP recommendations for states, districts, and schools: Focus on homework that requires practice of rigorous grade-level content aligned with the Common Core, and/or provide access to Khan Academy’s online homework aligned to Common Core.
Current CAP Experts in K-12 Education strike me as short of teaching experience in classrooms. Recent articles show they are supporters of charter schools, treat the Gates-funded Common Core as if exemplary and look forward to instructional delivery by computers (mislabeled personalized learning). They are arrogant pushers of specific instructional materials and high school curricula, aided by the Gates-funded EdReports scheme. The Center for American Progress is no friend of public education.
CAP also has a news arm, Think Progress, a newletter supported by CAP’s Action Fund but represented as an “editorially independent project.” I wonder. The IRS 990 says: “The Action Fund makes communications to the general public commending or criticizing particular public policy positions taken by various candidates. … The newsletter is intended to “impact the national debate and transform progressive ideas into policy through rapid response communications, public education, grassroots organization and advocacy in partnership with American citizens, executive and legislative branch policymakers and progressive leaders throughout the country and the world.” The Newsletter has a new “Members-Only Commenting” feature available only “to our donors” with perks (e.g., shaping the content) for monthly rates at $5. or $15 or $35.
I looked a recent Think Progress Newsletters dealing with charter schools. I found seven. Of these, most are reports on federal budget and policies under Trump/Devos. The strangest had this headline: “Lawsuit claims that same-sex marriage leads to charter schools, and it may be right.” The author, Ian Millhiser, is a lawyer with expertise on Supreme Court cases. I could not find my way through the legal leaps connecting charter schools with same-sex marriage. The legal objective seemed to be that of establishing a federal law supporting educational choice, that to be justified by past Supreme Court rulings bearing on the 14th Amendment. The case was dismissed 02/20/2019. The law firm advancing this dubious cause also filed the Vergara v. California suit that dealt with a child’s right to instruction by “effective teachers.” That was overturned on appeal. https://thinkprogress.org/tag/charter-schools/
GENERATION PROGRESS is the youth activist and youth journalism arm of CAP. https://genprogress.org/our-issues/
WHO FUNDS CAP? Using the CAP website, I constructed a spreadsheet listing CAP donors for the last five years according to several tiers on money. I will report on some of the key donors later on.
Thanks, Laura, Think Progress is up for sale. If it’s bought, we’ll find out if the new owner wants staff to continue hatchet jobs on Bernie.
The collaboration between Cynthia G. Brown and Kamala Harris is no surprise. Kamala’s sister, Maya, was one of 3 senior policy advisors who developed Hillary’s agenda.
Cynthia G. Brown and AEI’s Frederick Hess were on the same page in their recommendations in 2011, “The New Education Philanthropy”.
Oh PUKE! 🤮 What is WRONG with this picture? With DEMS like this, we don’t need the GOP to take us all to the DARK AGES again.
Reportedly, Chelsea Clinton’s spokesperson is claiming Chelsea and her husband didn’t know about Jeffrey Epstein’s reputation until 2015. It’s additional proof that Chelsea and her husband aren’t the brightest bulbs in the pack.
Many thanks to Laura for all her research and expertise in revealing those that stand behind the mask of CAP. Based on the qualifications of most of the “thinkers” in the tank, I believe we here at this blog are imminently qualified to run an organization that reforms our economy so that it works for all. We are just as brainy and unqualified as those that are the talking heads of CAP. Therefore, we are experts. (sarcasm)
As for Jeb Bush and his ilk, I am with Linda. I have more respect for hamburger flippers and those that pick up the garbage. At least they do honest work for a living.
Looking back at Diane’s earlier post about CAP, I thought Diane’s ending to her post bears repeating and should be food for thought for faux Democrats.
She writes,”Progressive Democrats support real public schools. Progressive Democrats do not support privately managed charter schools. Progressive Democrats do not support a sector that was built to smash teachers’ unions and that is 90% non-union. Progressive Democrats support democratically controlled public schools.”
Correction: eminently
Who are the (alleged) experts who speak for the Democratic mainstream?
They are powerful people at the top that have been corrupted by their power and they no longer can be trusted because of that corruption.
The only solution is to put them all in straight jackets, lock them in isolated padded cells, one to a cell, and put Duct Tape over their mouths. For sustenance, stick a needle in a veins and feed them from a bag using a drip system. For waste, they wear adult diapers that are changed three times a day. Never take off the straight jackets or Duct Tape.
Ex-spurt- a has-been under pressure.
As always, excellent, Laura!
IMO, CAP’s policies are one and the same with Gates’ control objectives undermining democracy and establishing oligarchy. If AFT stopped funding CAP, the process of weaning media and the public from the view that CAP is liberal would be easier. And, those connected with CAP like O’Leary, Podesta, Daschle and Larry Summers would have greater difficulty selling themselves as on the left.
and why the connection continues says so much about the mess we find ourselves in
Homework in early grades interests me a lot, so I’ve rambled into weeds of Ulrich Boser’s Homework Study– & taking you on a big tangent here.
It’s not terrible– but gotta snicker at this early-on pearl of wisdom: “Homework is often focused on low-level skills in the Common Core standards, particularly in the earlier grades (No duh 😀 ) “… did not require students to demonstrate the full depth of knowledge required of the content standards.” Gimme strategic, rigorous nightly assnts for my 6yo said no parent ever. (Oh wait I had a nerdy friend w/a gifted kid: maybe 1/500?)
The CAP’s “Homework” report shows minimal understanding of youngest students. RE: math: “In grades K-2, for instance, the content standards emphasize the performance expectations of “procedures,” or computation, and “demonstrate,” or understanding, but the homework samples submitted primarily emphasized the procedures level of performance expectation.” Yup. That’s because K-2 students have no “homework” way to demonstrate understanding of arithmetic principles, short of producing a grade-5-level paragraph of written explanation. Even a stick-figure cartoon strip would take an hour of frustration. Ditto those horrible worksheets requiring wobbly little fingers to produce multiple dots in circles, hatch-marks etc in a too-small space [ = number sense!] In K-2, understanding will be demonstrated in the classroom through activities designed & observed by –gasp—the teacher.
K-2 assnts IMHO should be a single physical activity (e.g., “go do &report back” or “find & bring in”) which feed into the next day’s classroom lesson. Worksheets for ages 5-7 are an abomination: no matter how cleverly conceived, they are too abstract, too focused on reading/ writing, and turn everything into a ppr&pencil struggle. [& I hate to tell you, their proliferation in K-2 pubsch means I’ve been seeing an only slightly-modified version in commercial PreK chains for a decade, complete w/banishing of hands-on matls in favor of long tables w/chairs – for 3/4y.o.’s…]
There were very few examples of ‘good’ & ‘bad’ hw assnts for early grades, & an admission that only ½ of the 300 study participants sent them in. Conclusions were based mainly on parent survey responses to a few “leading-the-witness” Q’s (as they say on L&O) – too easy? or rigorous? Sounds to me like the study wasn’t very rigorous.
Nevertheless… taking a good look at the quality of hw assnts, especially in early grades, is not a terrible idea. There is a lot of canned craap out there—much of it rubber-stamped as “aligned to CCSS”– Xeroxed off & sent home w/o much thought. [Dare I say? That’s my parent-of-3boys talking; they did K-2 in mid-‘90’s, but examples sent to press by CCSS-frustrated parents look the same.] Measuring hw against CCSS stds could be a waste of time, but in this study they’re not looking at individual stds, just overall goals to lean away from rote toward concepts, assess understanding of concepts, conjecture, demonstrate, prove. This seems a good plan with math: pre-CCSS texts/wkbks had similar goals– & similar implementation pbms– uncorrected by CCSS.
Between the lines of the CAP study’s blather, you actually can envision how to implement this dry regurgitation of principles – especially as authors often repeat: total hw should never be more than 10mins x grade (i.e., 0 for K, 10mins 1st gr, etc). When you peep under the jargon, I think all they’re saying is: don’t make 1st-gr hw a nightly 10mins of repetition/ rote. Maybe do that Mon – apply to a real-world situation Tues [eg. go outside & measure something]— imagine your own fantasy application Wed, we’ll share in class Thurs. And ditch assnts that do none of above.
That said, the paper unfortunately rests on the usual ed-reform assumption that “schools should” buy into our micromanaging ideas, & furthermore prove they’re doing it via district audits of hw assnts 😀 What this paper needs is a re-vamp by experienced K12 educators: dump the cognitive psychobabble, re-frame with plenty of real-life examples, & disseminate widely. Then do every teacher a favor & develop into an ebook alternative to the “aligned w/CCSS” craap wkbooks.
P.S… The [evidence-free] speculation that more tech tools – personalized learning?!—Hey, even Khan assnts—would be a “less expensive” way to make this happen is IMHO ridiculous. Clicking& scrollling canned 3rd party craap hardly demonstrates “full depth of knowledge.”
P.P.S… This study has a huge gap, spelled E L A. Excepting one “bad” example of 1st-gr ELA hw, the sum total of ELA input was in the introduction: “In language arts, the standards moved students away from narrative-based assignments, instead concentrating on using evidence to build arguments and reading more nonfiction.” There’s a graph showing ELA hw didn’t measure up any better than math hw to CCSS reqts, but no details or explanation. ??
If only teachers were the ones being asked for input about homework (and everything else in education). That’s the problem: They never ask experienced teachers. I tell students on the first day of class, and parents at the first back to school night event, that homework is not supposed to be challenging; it’s supposed to be practice with or solidification of the challenges the students learned in class with my supervision and guidance. I tell them that if the homework I assign is so difficult that they need help or to stay up late, either I didn’t teach the topic well enough or they didn’t participate in class well enough.
I tell them to let me know if homework is challenging so we can uncover the underlying problem together. But for corporate reformsters, no, oh no, everything has to be “rigorous”. Everything has to require “grit” or “growth mindset” or some other corporate buzzword that has to do with accepting and working through inequalities instead of fighting to right the wrongs. Parents and students always appreciate my homework policy. They cheer aloud when I voice it. My homework policy has received standing ovations. But corporatists don’t want to hear it. They never ask me (unless it’s a push poll).
My grandson had nothing but CCSS homework for the entire year of 3rd grade. It was deadly dull drudgery designed to make students competent test takers.
RE: Lisette Partelow bio: I find it mind-boggling that someone whose teaching experience is limited to 2 yrs’ TFA assnt in 1st grade publishes for “the voice of the Democratic establishment” on “Curriculum Reform in the Nation’s Largest School Districts”, using “the Gates-funded EdReports criteria for judging whether fourth-and eighth-grade math and ELA instructional materials were aligned with the Common Core.” Zero experience in teaching 4th grade or 8th grade or CCSS for those grades.
Hey, if all you’re trying to do is a bureaucratic bean-count, lining up and comparing two texts, sans related on-the-ground teaching experience– let alone in-school experience as a curriculum supv, any reasonably intelligent BA can do it. M.Ed at George Mason not required.
I find it mind boggling that rich people get away with self-appointing to destroy democracy and that they find so many of our fellow Americans who are willing to package the affront to decency from positions at stink tanks.
Dilettante TFA’s working as legislative aids to members of Congress- the barbarians breached the gates with a scorched earth plan for American communities and their children and Main Street economies.
I too am dismayed by their lack of teaching experience. Not a veteran teacher among them. You’d think they’d want at least one. How can one smell a bad curriculum if one hasn’t taught for a long time? But they don’t know what they don’t know: the Dunning Kreuger effect. Or maybe they are smart enough to know they don’t really know, but they keep faking it because they like the paycheck.
I am so dismayed by the whole wisdom-free American education establishment, both the pro-charter and much of the anti-charter. I just hope China has as many misguided education “experts” as we do; otherwise we’re going to be the losers in the clash of the great powers.
If there’s one pearl of wisdom this veteran teacher would like the CAP experts to know it’s “It’s the curriculum, stupid.”
Do sharks ever eat each other?
So why isn’t CAP throwing all their weight behind Cory Booker?! Btw, has Elizabeth Warren expressly denounced charters yet?
Speculating – Clinton Dems prefer Kamala and, as a lesser alternative- Biden.
Kamala’s sister was one of 3 senior policy advisors for Clinton’s 2016 campaign agenda.
Thanks Laura for all your sleuthing. You and Mercedes Schneider must make the naked Emperor want to run and hide under the trash in the nearest dumpster.
Among Laura’s discoveries: ” Think Progress Newsletters dealing with charter schools. I found seven. Of these, most are reports on federal budget and policies under Trump/Devos. The strangest had this headline: “Lawsuit claims that same-sex marriage leads to charter schools, and it may be right.”
The person that wrote that headline must have been smoking something pretty strong.
Meth?
The LBGT views of the religious right’s patriarchy were trussed up by astroturfers to promote the Gates/Walton/Koch scheme for privatization …but, that’s an entirely different story.
Are you saying they were smoking church incense?
Makes sense.
In-sense, that is
“Religion is for kooks”
There were warnings about CAP at least as far back as 2013. Pacific Standard posted an article “Meet the Flexians…a new class of people who serve overlapping roles in government, business and media with smiling finesse…controlling the flow of money and power…use former roles a in government to enable work as corporate champions without being upfront about about it when at speaking engagements… they have a new set of cultural norms.”
The article singles out the Daschle’s (Tom chairs the CAP board) as example. The expensive, failed digitalization of medical records was an entreaty by Tom Daschle to Obama.
Larry Summers, CAP’s “Distinguished Senior Fellow” and, his Harvard friend,
Andrei Shleifer, chief architect of Russian privatization, were noted in the article. The lawsuit involving them and Harvard on one side required a lot of money to settle.
Harvard’s new cultural norm.
Today, TPM posted an example of how the political left gets screwed by the reporting of “non-partisan” media. The referenced Axios article was about “polling” numbers and opinions of unnamed sources. Axios’ top staff formerly worked at Politico.
IMO, the slant in the Axios article sounded a lot like what the Neo-liberal, Clinton wing of the Dem party would produce.
The reality is that CAP is is a right wing organization.
But, as FAIRs Alan MacLeod astutely points out
“To Media, No Democrat Can Possibly Be Right-Wing”
https://fair.org/home/to-media-no-democrat-can-possibly-be-right-wing/
Isn’t it all about where an organization stands in relationship to who is in power?
Right now, the John Birch Society is in power – which makes it “mainstream”. It would be dangerous for the media to mischaracterize the position of CAP as also “right wing” which only normalizes – and hides – how very far right wing the Republicans have gone.
I agree with you that CAP is certainly conservative on many issues, but that means their view is squarely what a moderate Republican in the early 1980s would have been. Except they are far more to the left on social issues.
What good does it do to scare people away from voting for Democrats by using vague and inaccurate phrases like “right wing” which is no different from how the far right attacks Bernie or AOC and the squad as “left wing”. In fact, Bernie and AOC are espousing positions that are close to what mainstream Democrats supported under LBJ (in economics, not foreign policy). it’s just that the right wing Republicans have made that look far left.
CAP is an organization supporting Democrats who are pro-business in economics and very friendly to privatization. But compared to mainstream Republicans, they are not “right wing”. And the real right wing is helped by voters who think “oh, I’ll vote for this Republican who just wants exactly the same policies as Bill Clinton because everyone is telling me that they are both right wing and exactly the same.” Since those voters are not that bothered by Bill Clinton’s economic policies, they are fine with a far right wing Republican who they are told is exactly like the right wing Clinton.
But I do agree with you that if the media is identifying organizations like CAP as “mainstream Democrat” that is absolutely wrong. This is the fault of lazy journalists who can’t be bothered to find out what the mainstream Democrats really want.
Have we learned that the political associates closest to the Clintons and Obama have no inviolate principles- not democracy, not preservation of the safety net that workers paid for (S.S. and Medicare), not preservation of America’s most important common good (public education), not protection of a safe water source (Flint), not equal justice (Marc Rich), not access to affordable medications,…
The most exalted in the Clinton inner circle, people like Larry Summers, Ann O’Leary, Neera Tanden, John Podesta, Sheryl Sandberg, the widow Steve Jobs, what are their principles?
And yes, it is profoundly heart breaking that Republicans like Trump and McConnell and their associates, Stephen Miller, Steve Bannon. Russian oligarchs, the NRA and Charles and David Koch are far worse in their treatment of their fellow Americans.