There was a news story recently that a New York journalist accused Trump of trying to rape her, back in the 1990s. This sort of accusation now is so common that it tends to be ignored as yet another “he said-she said.”
George Conway, husband of Trump’s senior advisor Kellyanne Conway, says that Republicans should believe her because they believed that Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broadderick, who had less evidence than today’s accuser.
Right before the second Presidential debate in 2016, Trump introduced four women to the media, all of whom claimed they were sexually assaulted by Clinton. Trump called Broadderick “courageous.” This was his effort, writes Conway, to defuse the Access Hollywood tape in which he bragged that he grabbed women by their genitals and they let him do whatever he wanted.
Conway writes:
But today there’s another woman with a similar allegation, against a different powerful man. Her name is E. Jean Carroll.
She, too, says that she was raped — by Donald Trump…
Carroll’s claim, for a number of reasons, actually rests upon a significantly stronger foundation than Broaddrick’s.
For one thing, before she went public with her story, Broaddrick had repeatedly denied that Clinton had assaulted her, even under oath: In an affidavit she had submitted in Paula Jones’s sexual harassment case against Clinton, Broaddrick had sworn that the allegations “that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies … are untrue,” that the press had previously sought “corroboration of these tales,” but that she had “repeatedly denied the allegations.” (Disclosure: I provided behind-the-scenes pro bono legal assistance to Jones’s lawyers.)…
Finally, no controversy involving Trump would be complete without at least one utterly brazen, easily disprovable Trumpian lie. In his statement denying the rape allegation, he added the claim that “I’ve never met this person in my life.”
If Trump had even bothered to glance at Carroll’s published account, he would have seen a photograph of himself and his then-wife, Ivana, from 1987 ― in which he was amiably chatting with Carroll and her then-husband. By making the absurd and mendacious assertion that he never even met Carroll, Trump utterly annihilates the credibility of his claim that he didn’t assault her.
Conway asks: Why did Republicans believe Broadderick but not Carroll?
Answer: Republicans know he is a sexual predator but they don’t care. They care about getting anti-abortion, pro-gun extremists and religious fundamentalists appointed to the federal judiciary. That’s all that matters, not ethics or morality.
I never cease to be amazed why anyone pays attention to this grifter. Were it not for his wife, no one would be paying attention to him whatsoever. But now his new-found notoriety will provide cover for her when they take their show on the chat show road whenever she leaves the White House. Chuck Todd and MTP, for example, must be salivating at the potential bookings they will have in the future as the conning Conway couple take the place of the Matalin-Carville circus. He can claim to have been against Individual-1 while his wife was the mouthpiece. They will be raking in more money as they continue to take up airtime with lies and he will use his “opposition” to provide legitimacy for future destructive Republican policies and candidacies. Posts like this just add to Conway job security, bank account, and malignancy.
Would you ever want this man to be your husband? He talks on Howard Stern’s program in a way that would make me rethink ever having anything to do with him. Would any woman want intimate details of their relationship being put on the radio? He has no respect. Getting money must be the only draw. He was dating Melania while being married to Ivana.
………..
In newly released recordings, Trump says he groped Melania in public and Ivanka looks down on him
BY NINA BURLEIGH ON 9/25/17
Donald Trump thinks Ivanka “looks down on me,” concedes he has groped Melania in public, knows his compulsive handwashing “could be a psychological problem” and once suggested deploying sleeping gas on planes to deter terrorists, according to a new archive of all the conversations he had on air with The Howard Stern Show….
Trump has talked more to Stern than to any other single journalist or media personality, including Joe Scarborough, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Chris Matthews, Larry King and Don Imus. The voluminous archive contains more than 104,357 words Trump uttered on The Howard Stern Show—a number which is, by the site’s calculations, 21 percent longer than The Art of the Deal, Trump’s first bestseller, which weighed in at 86,575 words.
Most of the conversations happened after Trump started dating Melania, and Stern usually teed off by asking intimate questions about the former model. In a conversation on November 11, 1999, transcribed for the site, Trump called in to hawk an upcoming prizefight at the Taj Mahal casino, then talked about PDA with Melania and how their first night went.
Stern: Have you ever felt her up in public?
Trump: Yeah.
Stern: Yeah. As I know.
Trump: I’m very well behaved, actually, and almost always I’m very down the middle.
Stern: How did you meet this supermodel?
Trump: I met her at a very big party in New York. And she was there along with other supermodels, and I greeted all of them, and I said, that’s the one that’s the most beautiful.
Stern: Wow.
Trump: And she is considered beautiful by the other girls. I mean they, she’s really considered most beautiful, but she’s beyond beauty, she’s a very nice person.
Stern: And you got stank on your hangover the first night?
Trump: I didn’t do well with her the first time.
Stern: You didn’t.
Trump: No, it was not working. The whole thing was not working the first night.
On May 24, 2002, Trump referred to getting “the right price” for Melania on a billboard.
Stern: She must be great in the sack. She must have magic…. She must do something.
Trump: Well, I let her do advertising down there because I got her for the right price, Howard [referring to Melania on a New York City billboard ad].
Stern: She must be driving you crazy.
Trump: I really made a good deal. She did go on the billboards, and I got it for the right price.
Stern: And she’s not a—she’s not a pain in the ass, like Ivana?
Trump: No, she’s great…
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-melania-ivanka-terrorists-howard-stern-670309
Pretty much
Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
George must be permanently exiled to the living room couch at this point.
When KellyAnne gets asked about her hubby’s Trump hate, she totally seethes, barely keeping it together without exploding rage:
(btw, she’d make a great performer on a soap opera, or “Desperate Housewives,” or on a “Real Housewives of D.C.” reality show.)
go to 2:55
“I think that’s a really inappropriate question and here’s why ..”
or especially this exchange:
go to 10:35
“It’s fascinating to me that CNN would go there,” (i.e. ask about my husband’s Trump-hating tweets), “but it’s very good for the whole world to have just witnessed” (i.e. my being asked about her husband’s Trump-hating tweets) “that it’s now fair game (to ask such questions) …”
” … ”
“That” (your asking me that question) “was meant to harass and embarrass” (me) … “This” (your asking me this question) “is a fascinating ‘Cross the Rubicon’ moment, and I’ll leave it at that.”
” … ”
“I’m sorry. ‘It’? It” (a married couple’s disagreeing in public) “ ‘is hard for’ WHOM? Back up. No, you just said that ‘it’s hard.’ It’s ‘hard for WHOM?’ … No. You said ‘for two adults.’ So you’re talking about my marriage again? … That really diverts attention to the issues that Americans really care about, but like I said. CNN chose to go there. I think that (my being asked these rude questions) “is going to be fascinating moving forward.”
Also, somewhere in there, KellyAnne also claims that CNN is harming “my children” by asking those questions.
I expect there’ll be more of this, should KellyAnne be asked about the latest news.
Did you ever think that George Conway might have a character flaw because he’s married to this woman? Sometimes I think it must all be just a show.
I have no idea what happens between these two people but I think it is incredibly brave for George Conway to write and say what he does. He knows, as he put it, that Trump is “mentally unwell.”
We all know Trump is a rapist. I mean, the man has openly expressed sexual thoughts about his own daughter. He’s slime, as we’ve all known for quite a while. Evangelical “Christian” [sic] Republicans who support him are utter hypocrites.
That said, let’s not pretend that Clinton was any kind of saint. It’s quite likely that he did in fact rape Broaddrick. The woman she shared the hotel room with found her in the room the day of the alleged rape ‘in a state of shock with her panty hose ripped from the crotch”. She helped her stop the bleeding from her lip – Broaddrick alleged that Clinton forced a kiss on her and then bit her lip. As he was leaving the room he allegedly said, “You should get some ice on that.”
Yes, sure, Broaddrick denied it for a long time. There are all kinds of reasons women deny rape – shame, fear, concern for publicity/reputation, etc. But she has recanted her denial since 1999 and says in clear terms that Clinton raped her. I believe women, whether they accuse Republicans or Democrats. Women have very little to gain from lying about being raped. Men have everything to gain from denying it.
No front page coverage of the latest accusation in major newspapers.
Ho hum, the guy is a bum, so what is real news? The indifference of Republicans and his religious followers is astonishing.
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2019/06/22/major-newspapers-largely-leave-new-report-sexual-assault-trump-their-front-pages/224009
Every day another outrage. When, when, will the nightmare end?
The evangelicals are now floating this excuse: “God uses even imperfect people.”
Is there anything that Mr. Trump could do that would cause him to lose support among his followers? What, exactly, would it take?
There is nothing Trump can do to discourage his ardent evangelical base. They forgive every sin. Adultery is ok. Lust is ok.Lying is ok. Greed is ok. Bigotry is ok. As he quickly understood, he could murder someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue in NYC and his devoted admirers would not care.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-running-for-president-4eva-video_n_5d0dc80ae4b07ae90d9d6e81
Bob Shepherd: I get Time magazine and Trump is just plain creepy. His cult followers would want this. He can do no wrong, and as my brother says, “He is the best president this country has ever had.”
Imagine what would have happened to Nixon if Faux, Sinclair, Hannity and Rush L had been around to keep him in power?
It has long been the case that Republicans would get a tear in their eyes thinking about “America” and “the flag” and yet would betray every principle upon which the country was founded, including, in the case of their would-be “President for Life,” the very idea of democratic elections.
Bob Shepherd
Lets stop blaming Trump for this and put the blame where it belongs. The Democrats have utterly failed to confront him. As Lofgren pointed out in 2011 they do not know how to use language. It almost makes me yearn for Grayson and Weiner.
Is there any doubt in your mind that if the situation were totally reversed. If the Republican(Tea) Party held the House and the Democrats held the Senate and the White House; the Democratic President would even before the release of the Mueller report been hanging from the flag pole in front of the White House.
The Democrats say they are not hearing about it from their constituents. They probably aren’t . Because they never allow it to com up. And the notion of leadership is beyond them.
They would much rather discuss legislation like M4all which they would not support if it had a chance of passing. Gun Control where they have ceded the field to the Gun Nuts. Election reform that wont even get a hearing in the Senate. A Green New Deal they could not get enough Democrats to agree on,. What will democrats have delivered at the end of 2020.
Biden who represents the DLC /NDC moderate wing of the party; talks about reaching across the isle. Where has he been the last 10 years. That hopey changey guy tried that when he wasted a Black Swan moment of mammoth proportions. Well maybe it wasn’t wasted and he was just not the person we hoped he was.
What will they deliver, probably 4 more years of Trump.
I have been wondering, Joel, what Trump has on Pelosi.
Once again, we are intellectual soul mates on this. Rep. Ted Deutch tweeted: “We can’t get interviews. We can’t get Mueller’s files or unredacted report. We can’t hold hearings with material witnesses. Hope Hicks refused to answer our questions 155 times. This is obstruction of Congress by the White House, plain and simple.”
To which I responded: “And the longer you let it go unaccountable and unpunished, the sooner you will allow the destruction of the constitutional system of checks and balances. Further whining equals acquiescence and complicity. Get a backbone and stand up for the republic, Democrats!”
The U.S. will either make a pretty rapid transition to Social Democratic government, or it will implode, and that won’t be pretty. The old guard in the Democratic Party doesn’t grok this, yet. But it will, one way or another.
GregB
At least Bob made me laugh for a second.
At the moment I am suffering Cuomo regret. Expect him to resume his attacks on teachers soon enough. Transaction-al politics frequently disappoints.
And yes the democratic dog and pony show goes on. At least with the Republicans you know how vile they are going in.
Now, as the presidential campaign gets underway, let the dirt begin in earnest. Trump will triumph in dirt because he rose in dirt. Others will fall because of dirt because they maintain the facade of goodness. Why do some public figures seem to avoid any effect of their failings, while others vanish from view?
Clinton and Trump share the Teflon coating attributed to Reagan because both of them has a political base that fears the opposition more than it hates their misdeeds. Consider Trump’s political base.
Evangelicals receive only scant news of his misdeeds, and when forced to confront something like his rape accusation, they truthfully assert that King David did much worse and Jacob himself was a rascal. While their literary references are indeed true, and it is additionally a common theme in the Bible that men who are evil carry out the work of God, this has absolutely nothing to do with the evangelical support for trump. They got Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, and that is all he needs to get their vote. All across the country, laws that are written to challenge Roe V Wade are being signed in state houses.
The other part of his base consists of those who see him as the only hope economically. They see the free market as a concept that is holy, and government as a thing malignant upon the great body of society (well, they see it that way until a disaster, financial or natural, points out the need for it close to home). Joining this part of the base are the thousands of people in small businesses and in low-paying jobs who do not understand why life is economically hard for them. Joining the others in their devotion to free market ideas and hatred of government, they see alternatives to trump as dangerous.
Neither trump nor Clinton was obliged to get a majority of the vote. Clinton was the beneficiary of the Perot campaign, and Trump gains his power by the divisions in the geographic areas of the country. To maintain these divisions, trump occasionally reeves his engine with anti-immigrant propaganda, fanning the flames of fear. As the election approaches, he will scatter hope with promises of a wildly successful economy and promise of things like infrastructure improvement. He will scatter fear by at tacking his opponent is ways that will make the already lethargic democratic base stay home instead of voting.
This is the stuff Teflon is made of.
Trump: I do not need congressional approval to strike Iran
President Trump believes he does not need congressional approval to strike Iran, he told Hill.TV during an exclusive interview outside the Oval Office.
He’s getting one step closer to telling Congress that they have no power. The Repugs don’t seem to mind.
I”m ashamed of how badly we treat people we don’t understand. We tried to wipe out the Native American culture and now are taking away voting rights of some Indians. They are mostly living in extreme poverty and who cares? Our history isn’t very clean. It’s just sad to see this hatred rise up again and this time against children who are brown.
……………………………………………..
Japanese-American Internment Survivors Protest Plan to Jail Migrant Kids at Prison Camp
June 24, 2019
Democracy Now! was there when five Japanese-American elders, survivors of U.S. internment camps, engaged in civil disobedience Saturday outside the Fort Sill Army post in Oklahoma, where the Trump administration plans to indefinitely detain 1,400 immigrant and refugee children starting next month. Fort Sill was an internment camp for 700 Japanese-American men in 1942. It was one of more than 70 sites where the U.S. government incarcerated about 120,000 Japanese Americans during World War II, including one of 14 U.S. Army bases. President Obama first used Fort Sill in 2014 to detain migrant children seeking asylum from violence in Central America. Descendants of internment camp survivors were also present at the peaceful protest. We feature a video report from Fort Sill and speak with Mike Ishii, co-chair of Tsuru for Solidarity. Ishii was at Fort Sill Army Base Saturday and helped organize the act.
SATSUKI INA: My name is Satsuki Ina. I am a former child incarceree during World War II. This is a photograph of me when I was imprisoned. Seventy-five years ago, 120,000 of us were removed from our homes and forcefully incarcerated in prison camps across the country. We are here today to protest the repetition of history.
We were in American concentration camps. We were held under indefinite detention. We were without due process of law. We were charged without any evidence of being a threat to national security, that we were in an unassimilable race, that we would be a threat to the economy.
We hear these exact words today regarding innocent people seeking asylum in this country. And unlike 1942, when America turned their back on us while we were disappearing from our homes, our schools, our farms and our jobs, we are here today to speak out, to protest the unjust incarceration of innocent people seeking refuge in this country. We stand with them, and we are saying, “Stop repeating history.”
KIYOSHI INA: My name is Kiyoshi Ina. I’m from Concord, California. And I spent the first four-and-a-half years in a concentration camp. I was born in Topaz, Utah. And I’m here to protest against the incarceration of the immigrant children here at Fort Sill.
NIKKI NOJIMA LOUIS: I’m Nikki Nojima Louis. And on December 7th, 1941, in Seattle, Washington, I was celebrating my fourth birthday when the FBI interrupted my birthday party and removed my father to Lordsburg, New Mexico, the DOJ camp, and subsequently Santa Fe, New Mexico. My mother and I were incarcerated at the Puyallup fairgrounds, called Camp Harmony, and later in Minidoka, Idaho.
MILITARY POLICE OFFICER KEYES: Excuse me, people. Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen. You cannot protest on Fort Sill. If you want to protest, you have to go across the street, the highway. And that needs to happen right now. Let’s go. Let’s go. Let’s go. Now. Today!
UNIDENTIFIED: We’re not moving…
CHIZU OMORI: OK, yes, yes. I spent three-and-a-half years at Poston, Arizona, an American concentration camp, during World War II. And I’m here to bear witness to the travesty of the American justice system, in that the family separation policy, which is ruining the lives of these children. I’m very incensed about the government policy of separating parents. And we, the people, have to stand up and protest this…
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/24/stop_repeating_history_japanese_americans_incarcerated
This might be off topic but I am disgusted with the maltreatment of children. This country, under the bigoted ‘guidance’ of the Great Trump, is SICK!
…………………………………………………
People want to donate diapers and toys to children at Border Patrol facilities in Texas. They’re being turned away.
June 24, 2019
On Sunday, Austin Savage and five of his friends huddled into an SUV and went to an El Paso Target, loading up on diapers, wipes, soaps and toys.
About $340 later, the group headed to a Border Patrol facility holding migrant children in nearby Clint with the goal of donating their goods. Savage said he and his friends had read an article from The New York Times detailing chaos, sickness and filth in the overcrowded facility, and they wanted to help.
But when they arrived, they found that the lobby was closed. The few Border Patrol agents — Savage said there were between eight and 10 of them — moving in and out of a parking facility ignored them.
For a while, the group stood there dumbfounded about what to do next. Ultimately, they decided to pack up and head home. Savage said he wasn’t completely surprised by the rejection; before he left, the group spotted a discarded plastic bag near the lobby door holding toothpaste and soap that had a note attached to it: “I heard y’all need soap + toothpaste for kids.”
“A good friend of mine is an immigration attorney, and he warned us that we were going to get rejected,” Savage said. “We were aware of that, but it’s just the idea of doing something as opposed to passively allowing this to occur.”…
Some kids and teens have spent nearly a month without adequate food or water. Nearly a dozen others in a McAllen facilitywere sick with the flu.
Democratic state Rep. Terry Canales of Edinburg tweeted this weekend that he wrote to Border Patrol asking for a list of acceptable items to donate. He said officials told his office by email they do not accept donations. An official with Border Patrol did not respond to a request for comment…
https://www.texastribune.org/2019/06/24/texas-border-facility-donations-turned-away/
I will write this again, “Child & Human Trafficking is going on.”
This is just plain sickening. The US is not a third world country and it can do better than this. How about the tax cut for the wealthy being repealed? Why do people with power think its okay to be so abusive?
…………………………………………………………..
Homeland Security admits it’s using abhorrent conditions at detention centers to deter migration
JUL 1, 2019,
REBEKAH ENTRALGO
The report, first obtained by NBC News, detailed the conditions during a May 7 tour of a border station in the El Paso sector and found that only four showers were available for 756 immigrants. Additionally, over half of the immigrants were being held outside in the Texas heat, while the immigrants inside were being kept in cells at over five times their capacity. One cell meant for a maximum of 35 people held 155 adult males with only one toilet and sink. The cell was so overcrowded that the internal temperatures reached over 80 degrees and the men were unable to lay down to sleep.
While border patrol processing centers are only meant for temporary stays of up to 36 hours, some migrants at this facility in El Paso reported stays of over 30 days.
“With limited access to showers and clean clothing, detainees were wearing soiled clothing for days or weeks,” the report said…
None of this information, however, was new to DHS. The agency had the information about the conditions at this border patrol station for months and described it in the report as “chaos.” In spite of this, nothing was done. In fact, the report clearly outlines that the poor conditions thousands are facing at the hands of the U.S. government are actually the desired outcome.
“[Border Patrol] recognize[s] they have a humanitarian issue with detaining single adults for so long, but believe if they do not have a consequence delivery system, either prosecution or ICE detention, the flow will increase,” the report states, laying bare the Trump administration’s true motives: maintaining horrible conditions at border patrol facilities is necessary to deter immigrants from coming to the United States….
This logic on deterrence isn’t exactly anything new. The Obama administration began its expansion of family detention in 2014, and migrant children and families were routinely subject to freezing cold holding cells — nicknamed “hieleras” or “ice boxes” in Spanish. For example, in 2013 when 18-year-old Alexy Luis Lopez complained to officers about the temperature, one told him that maybe he should “think two times before trying to cross again.”
“Border Patrol seems to think these brutal conditions, and the human suffering that results, will deter immigration, but the fact is that many of these people are fleeing persecution and violence, reuniting with family, or are themselves U.S. citizens,” said James Duff Lyall, an attorney with ACLU of Arizona, back in 2015. “These policies and practices serve no legitimate purpose, violate the U.S. Constitution, and offend basic American values.”…
https://thinkprogress.org/dhs-oig-homeland-security-report-el-paso-detention-center-conditions-used-to-deter-migration-9b0420b7e70b/